Visual Question Answering
Also known as VQA
Overview
The field asks how machines can connect a question to relevant visual evidence, read text and diagrams, and combine perception with commonsense or specialized knowledge. Approaches range from vision-language encoders and multimodal large language models to region and crop grounding, OCR and scene graphs, retrieval-augmented agents, and fine-tuning or reinforcement learning. Benchmarks cover everyday images and compositional reasoning, knowledge-based and text-rich questions, and document, video, medical, scientific, and multi-view settings. A central challenge is that correct-sounding answers may lack reliable visual grounding: models still miss small details and spatial relations, struggle to combine evidence across views or long documents, and may fail to recognize when they should abstain.
Latest papers
253 papers36 papers in the last four weeks, up 13% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Semantic-Enriched Latent Visual Reasoning
RE-VLM: Event-Augmented Vision-Language Model for Scene Understanding
MetaRA: Metamorphic Robustness Assessment for Multimodal Large Language Model-based Visual Question Answering Systems
Chain-of-Procedure: Hierarchical Visual-Language Reasoning for Procedural QA
Training Long-Context Vision-Language Models Effectively with Generalization Beyond 128K Context
Test-Time Hinting for Black-Box Vision-Language Models
From Web to Pixels: Bringing Agentic Search into Visual Perception
Urban Risk-Aware Navigation via VQA-Based Event Maps for People with Low Vision
Unlocking UML Class Diagram Understanding in Vision Language Models
Geospatial-Temporal Sensemaking of Remote Sensing Activity Detections with Multimodal Large Language Model
MicroWorld: Empowering Multimodal Large Language Models to Bridge the Microscopic Domain Gap with Multimodal Attributed Property Graph
PolarVLM: Bridging the Semantic-Physical Gap in Vision-Language Models
Enhancing Visual Question Answering with Multimodal LLMs via Chain-of-Question Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Query-Dependent Use of Generated Descriptions for Reliable Visual Question Answering
Research on Vision-Language Question Answering Models for Industrial Robots
WildTableBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Table Understanding In the Wild
SpecVQA: A Benchmark for Spectral Understanding and Visual Question Answering in Scientific Images
WaferSAGE: Large Language Model-Powered Wafer Defect Analysis via Synthetic Data Generation and Rubric-Guided Reinforcement Learning
DIAGRAMS: A Review Framework for Reasoning-Level Attribution in Diagram QA
SIEVES: Selective Prediction Generalizes through Visual Evidence Scoring
M-VQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal, Multi-Entity, Multi-Hop Visual Question Answering
HAC: Parameter-Efficient Hyperbolic Adaptation of CLIP for Zero-Shot VQA
Revisiting Greedy Decoding for Visual Question Answering: A Calibration Perspective
BERAG: Bayesian Ensemble Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering
lost-in-the-middle'' effect, where relevant information in long contexts is overlooked. Concatenation also scales poorly: computational cost grows quadratically with context length, a problem that becomes especially severe when the context includes visual data, as in visual question answering. Attempts to mitigate these issues by limiting context length can further restrict performance by preventing models from benefiting from the improved recall offered by deeper retrieval. We propose Bayesian Ensemble Retrieval-Augmented Generation (BERAG), along with Bayesian Ensemble Fine-Tuning (BEFT), as a RAG framework in which language models are conditioned on individual retrieved documents rather than a single combined context. BERAG treats document posterior probabilities as ensemble weights and updates them token by token using Bayes' rule during generation. This approach enables probabilistic re-ranking, parallel memory usage, and clear attribution of document contribution, making it well-suited for large document collections. We evaluate BERAG and BEFT primarily on knowledge-based visual question answering tasks, where models must reason over long, imperfect retrieval lists. The results show substantial improvements over standard RAG, including strong gains on Document Visual Question Answering and multimodal needle-in-a-haystack benchmarks. We also demonstrate that BERAG mitigates the lost-in-the-middle'' effect. The document posterior can be used to detect insufficient grounding and trigger deflection, while document pruning enables faster decoding than standard RAG.