Search research

Generative Spoken Language Modeling (GSLM) enables text-free speech modeling by training language models (LMs) using discrete speech representations instead of textual transcription. In this paper, we investigate the performance of GSLM on speech synthesis and continuation using discrete speech representations with varying bitrates. We segment speech representations with fixed widths and train K-means models in multiple cluster sizes, resulting in various bitrate settings. We demonstrate that intelligible and natural speech can be synthesized at lower bitrate settings than the baseline. Furthermore, speech continuation quality remains stable at lower bitrates across multiple metrics, suggesting that the conventional GSLM setting may be redundant for effective speech generation. Although LLM-based metrics show higher correlation with human subjective score than conventional metrics, it remains low, highlighting the need for more stable automatic evaluation methods.

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) incur substantial inference costs due to their long and highly redundant visual-token sequences. Diversity-based pruning mitigates this cost by selecting token subsets based on pairwise cosine similarity. We find, however, that similarities between raw visual tokens are strongly concentrated in the positive range, limiting their ability to distinguish non-redundant tokens. A natural way to improve this resolution is to center token features before computing cosine similarity. Centering indeed reveals a substantially richer pairwise structure, yet unexpectedly degrades pruning performance when used alone. We show that this apparent contradiction arises because the raw geometry does more than represent pairwise diversity: it also implicitly favors globally distinctive tokens, which tend to contain semantically informative content. Centering better resolves subset diversity but loses this useful token-wise preference, revealing that diversity and distinctiveness are entangled in the raw geometry. Based on this analysis, we propose the \textbf{Cen}tered Geometry \textbf{Prune}r (Cen-Prune), which measures subset diversity using centered cosine similarity while retaining raw-space distinctiveness as a complementary token-wise preference. This lightweight, plug-and-play correction leaves the underlying selection mechanism unchanged and incurs negligible computational overhead. Extensive experiments across multiple image- and video-understanding benchmarks and LVLM architectures demonstrate that Cen-Prune provides robust improvements in overall performance across existing diversity-based pruners.

Large language model-based shopping agents are increasingly deployed in real-world e-commerce platforms, generating massive amounts of user interaction logs that provide valuable supervision for improving these agents. However, existing approaches primarily rely on offline training signals, such as user-item interactions or synthetic preference data, while largely overlooking the rich supervision contained in users' natural conversational feedback. Moreover, the available online feedback is heterogeneous, sparse, and noisy, making it difficult to transform into reliable learning signals automatically. To address these challenges, we propose LOFA, a framework that enables shopping agents to learn directly from real online interaction logs without human annotation. LOFA combines reinforcement learning over verifiable purchase outcomes with feedback-aware on-policy distillation, which identifies users'in-dialogue directives and converts them into dense token-level supervision. These complementary objectives capture both collaborative behavioral patterns and user-specific preferences. Extensive experiments on real-world e-commerce logs demonstrate that LOFA consistently improves recommendation quality, response helpfulness, and user-satisfaction alignment over strong baselines, highlighting the effectiveness of learning shopping agents from real online user feedback.

Closed-track testing plays a fundamental role in the verification and validation of automated driving systems (ADS), particularly for safety-critical scenarios, by enabling reproducible evaluation under controlled conditions. However, most existing approaches still rely on standardized protocols or predefined trajectories, leading to overly scripted interactions and limited ability to reproduce the natural complexity of public-road traffic. To address this limitation, we propose Video2Track, a framework that transfers real-world interactive driving scenarios from videos into steerable adversarial closed-track testing. The framework consists of two tightly coupled modules. The first is a scenario semantic mapping module, which extracts structured semantics from driving videos using a vision-language model and grounds them onto a closed-track topology library via retrieval-augmented generation, thereby identifying compatible map segments and interaction anchors. The second is a dynamic interactive testing module, which conditions on the grounded topology and anchors to generate diverse multi-agent trajectories through a conditional diffusion model, while regulating interaction intensity via a Stackelberg game with a parameterized adversarial objective. Closed-track experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework can faithfully reproduce representative real-world interaction scenarios and generate executable scenario variants with controllable risk levels and interaction styles, providing a scalable approach for realistic and steerable ADS validation.

Asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL) accelerates large language model (LLM) post-training by overlapping rollout generation with policy optimization, but the resulting stale, off-policy data can destabilize optimization and ultimately cause policy collapse. Existing methods typically retain or discard tokens based solely on the magnitude of their importance ratios, applying the same threshold uniformly across token positions. In this work, we reveal that the natural scale of the importance ratio varies systematically with token entropy. Under asynchronous dynamics, this entropy-ratio scaling dictates two distinct phenomena: at low entropy, the inherent train-inference discrepancy is drastically amplified into substantial sampling noise; at high entropy, in-flight weight updates naturally induce pronounced, legitimate exploratory deviations. Consequently, magnitude-only correction inadvertently admits the amplified noise while strictly masking out the essential exploration triggered by in-flight updates. To address this, we propose the Entropy-Scaled Trust Region (ESTR), which scales each token's off-policy deviation by its local entropy, requiring no auxiliary forward passes or explicit version-switch detection. Across long-horizon agentic tasks and mathematical reasoning benchmarks, ESTR consistently outperforms existing asynchronous methods and achieves the best train-inference consistency. It reaches $37.34$ avg@1 on BrowseComp-Plus and $95.69$ on multi-turn GSM8K, matching synchronous GRPO while achieving a $2.6\times$ speedup.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has gained growing attention in large language model (LLM) post-training, yet RL training remains fragile and can suffer from instability or collapse. One vital cause is training-inference mismatch: LLM adopts separate inference and training engines for generation efficiency and training precision, which in practice exhibits inconsistent probabilities for the same trajectories on training and inference sides, even with synchronized model parameters. This naturally induces a special type of off-policyness ever existing and poisoning the training. Prior works have made various efforts in addressing the off-policyness to stabilize the training policies under the mismatch. In this paper, we point out the objective misalignment neglected by existing works that an effective update to the policy in the training engine not necessarily ensures the improvement of the inference policy, i.e., the one used in deployment. To this end, we propose a new policy optimization objective for LLM RL, named Monotonic Inference Policy Improvement (MIPI). Following this principle, we introduce Monotonic Inference Policy Update (MIPU), a two-step LLM RL framework that constructs sampler-referenced candidate updates and selectively accepts synchronized candidates using an inference-side gap proxy. Experiments conducted on two model scales under high mismatch show that MIPU improves average reasoning performance and training stability.

Self-supervised learning in fluorescence microscopy often relies on 2D projections, despite the inherently three-dimensional nature of cells. We present a systematic comparison of 2D and 3D masked autoencoders (MAE-2D vs. MAE-3D) on volumetric microscopy data. Under matched architectures and training protocols, MAE-3D consistently outperforms 2D max-projection and slice-based variants on downstream single-cell tasks. We further align visual representations with a pretrained protein language model (ESM2) and show that cross-modal supervision yields larger gains for volumetric models. Channel cross-attention and frequency-domain regularization are critical for leveraging 3D spatial context. On protein--protein interaction prediction, our best model achieves a ROC--AUC of 0.86, while on protein localization it reaches an AUC$_{\text{micro}}$ of 0.95 and an F1$_{\text{micro}}$ of 0.74, demonstrating competitive performance on both tasks. Overall, our findings highlight the potential of volumetric modeling and multimodal alignment for representation learning in single-cell microscopy.

Unlearning knowledge is a pressing and challenging task in Large Language Models (LLMs) because of their unprecedented capability to memorize and digest training data at scale, raising more significant issues regarding safety, privacy, and intellectual property. However, existing works, including parameter editing, fine-tuning, and distillation-based methods, are all focused on flat sentence-level data but overlook the relational, multi-hop, and reasoned knowledge in naturally structured data. In response to this gap, this paper introduces Graph Oblivion and Node Erasure (GONE), a benchmark for evaluating knowledge unlearning over structured knowledge graph (KG) facts in LLMs.This KG-based benchmark enables the disentanglement of three effects of unlearning: direct fact removal, reasoning-based leakage, and catastrophic forgetting. In addition, Neighborhood-Expanded Distribution Shaping (NEDS), a novel unlearning framework, is designed to leverage graph connectivity and identify anchor-correlated neighbors, thereby enforcing a precise semantic separation between the forgotten fact and its semantic neighborhood. Evaluations on LLaMA-3-8B and Mistral-7B across multiple knowledge editing and unlearning methods showcase NEDS's superior performance (1.000 on unlearning efficacy and 0.839 on locality) on GONE and other benchmarks. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/GONE-Anonymous/GONE.

Current audio captioning relies on supervised learning with paired audio-caption data, which is costly to curate and may not reflect human preferences in real-world scenarios. To address this, we propose a preference-aligned audio captioning framework based on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). To capture nuanced preferences, we train a Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) based reward model using human-labeled pairwise preference data. This reward model is integrated into an RL framework to fine-tune any baseline captioning system without ground-truth annotations. Extensive human evaluations across multiple datasets show that our method produces captions preferred over baseline models, particularly when baselines fail to provide correct and natural captions. Furthermore, our framework achieves performance comparable to supervised approaches with ground-truth data, demonstrating effective alignment with human preferences and scalability in real-world use.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown strong performance in generating scientific figures from text or images. However, publication-ready figures often require iterative refinement, making scientific figure editing an important yet largely unexplored step toward interactive figure creation. Existing approaches rely on costly proprietary agentic systems, focus primarily on evaluation, or construct training supervision from synthetically generated edits. Instead, we leverage naturally occurring scientific revision and development trajectories as a scalable source of supervision. To this end, we introduce DaEdiTikZ, the first large-scale dataset of revision-derived scientific figure edits, constructed by mining 391K plausible TikZ edit pairs from arXiv, GitHub, and TeX SE and inferring 781K directed edit instructions with a VLM conditioned on rendered figures and TikZ code. We further introduce DaEdiTikZ-Bench, a human-refined benchmark with 690 instances, and train two compact Qwen3.5-based EdiTikZ models (4B and 9B) by jointly learning image-to-TikZ reconstruction and instruction-conditioned editing, followed by reinforcement learning (RL) with complementary rewards for rendered fidelity and edit application. Automatic evaluation places our 9B model above all tested baselines, while human evaluation with 9 annotators and 4,320 ratings places it above GPT-5.6-Sol and on par with Gemini-3.1-Pro. Under severe out-of-distribution shifts, it remains competitive with GPT-5.6-Sol near its 2K training sequence-length regime.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved strong results in improving large language models (LLMs) on tasks with stationary, verifiable rewards, such as mathematical reasoning and code execution. In these settings, the environment follows fixed rules and does not adapt strategically to the agent. Strategic dialogue differs in this respect: the environment is another agent that adapts to the policy, and success depends on the interaction between the two sides. Despite this interactive nature, current RL approaches typically train a target agent against a fixed counterpart or simulator. We find that this training paradigm encourages the policy to exploit counterpart-specific regularities rather than learn strategies that generalize across counterparts. We call this problem the static-counterpart mismatch, which we quantify directly in our experiments. To address it, we propose Isolated Bilateral Reinforcement Learning (IB-RL), in which the two roles coevolve through joint rollouts while each role optimizes its own reward through fully independent advantages, action masks, and update paths. We evaluate frozen policies against fully independent held-out counterparts in both domains. On Vehicle TeleSales, IB-RL achieves 89.6% Success@1, compared to 84.6% for the best unilateral RL baseline. On Deal-or-NoDeal, it reaches 98.4% agreement against DeepSeek V4 Pro, compared to 86.4% for the best unilateral baseline. These results indicate that jointly training both roles with strict peragent isolation produces policies that generalize more effectively to unseen counterparts.

Flow matching has recently become a new standard for behavior cloning in robotic manipulation. However, state-of-the-art flow matching policies suffer from a systematic structural mismatch: they rely on a globally fixed isotropic source distribution despite the strongly fragmented and heteroscedastic structure of robotic action spaces. This agnostic initialization forces the model to learn highly entangled vector fields, bottlenecking training efficiency and limiting overall policy performance. To address this limitation, we introduce Latent Action Guided Flow Matching (LAFM), a novel framework that replaces the monolithic Gaussian with an adaptive library of learned prior distributions. By grounding these distributions using a latent action model, LAFM maps current observations to discrete motion primitives, selecting a specialized base distribution that provides an informed, structurally aligned initialization for the denoising process. This dynamic adaptivity naturally accommodates heteroscedasticity in human demonstrations and makes transport trajectories shorter and less entangled. Empirically, LAFM substantially outperforms standard flow matching formulations, increasing task success rates by 23.4% in real-world robotic deployments and by 10.4% on the LIBERO-90 benchmark. Furthermore, we demonstrate that LAFM achieves state-of-the-art results, surpassing massively pre-trained vision-language-action models while utilizing significantly smaller architectures.

Evolve pairs a small local language model with a persistent, teacher-compiled knowledge store -- refined through sleep consolidation and usage-driven refresh -- to deliver substantial accuracy gains over the model's parametric baseline while amortizing teacher costs through cross-query knowledge reuse. Rather than retrieving document fragments at query time, Evolve constructs a store of semantically coherent sections compiled by teacher models at natural conceptual boundaries; new sections are staged on acquisition, consolidated offline through teacher-mediated merging, and refreshed inline when expired. A 2B-parameter local model handles classification and generation; large teacher models are invoked only for knowledge operations. Across 750 benchmark queries spanning custom specialist questions, NaturalQuestions, and TriviaQA, the 2B model augmented by Evolve improves from 20-33% baseline accuracy to 60-84% (+40-52pp) while reducing teacher invocations by over 50% through reuse. Post-consolidation compresses the knowledge store by 31-33.5% across three independent benchmarks while preserving accuracy; section-based retrieval outperforms chunk-based retrieval by 5-9pp across every lifecycle condition. The architecture supports two generation modes over the same lifecycle -- suppress (strict section-only grounding, auditable) and augment (section-supplemented responses).

In web environments, user preferences are often refined progressively as users move from browsing broad categories to exploring specific items. However, existing generative recommenders overlook this natural refinement process. Generative recommendation formulates next-item prediction as autoregressive generation over tokenized user histories, where each item is represented as a sequence of discrete tokens. Prior models typically fuse heterogeneous attributes such as ID, category, title, and description into a single embedding before quantization, which flattens the inherent semantic hierarchy of items and fails to capture the gradual evolution of user intent during web interactions. To address this limitation, we propose CoFiRec, a novel generative recommendation framework that explicitly incorporates the Coarse-to-Fine nature of item semantics into the tokenization process. Instead of compressing all attributes into a single latent space, CoFiRec decomposes item information into multiple semantic levels, ranging from high-level categories to detailed descriptions and collaborative filtering signals. Based on this design, we introduce the CoFiRec Tokenizer, which tokenizes each level independently while preserving structural order. During autoregressive decoding, the language model is instructed to generate item tokens from coarse to fine, progressively modeling user intent from general interests to specific item-level interests. Experiments across multiple public benchmarks and backbones demonstrate that CoFiRec outperforms existing methods, offering a new perspective for generative recommendation. Theoretically, we prove that structured tokenization leads to lower dissimilarity between generated and ground truth items, supporting its effectiveness in generative recommendation. Our code is available at https://github.com/YennNing/CoFiRec.

Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation (i.e., Code LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in AI-assisted software development and testing. However, recent studies have shown that these models are prone to generating vulnerable or even malicious code under adversarial settings. Existing red-teaming approaches rely on extensive human effort, limiting their scalability and practicality, and generally overlook the interactive nature of real-world AI-assisted programming, which often unfolds over multiple turns. To bridge these gaps, we present RedCoder, a red-teaming agent that engages victim models in multi-turn conversation to elicit vulnerable code. The pipeline to construct RedCoder begins with a multi-agent gaming process that simulates adversarial interactions, yielding a set of prototype conversations and an arsenal of reusable attack strategies. We then fine-tune an LLM on these prototype conversations to serve as the backbone of RedCoder. Once deployed, RedCoder autonomously engages Code LLMs in multi-turn conversations, dynamically retrieving relevant strategies from the arsenal to steer the dialogue toward vulnerability-inducing outputs. Experiments across multiple Code LLMs show that our approach outperforms prior single-turn and multi-turn red-team methods in inducing vulnerabilities in code generation, offering a scalable and effective tool for evaluating the security boundaries of modern code-generation systems.

Test-time adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a prominent strategy for adapting vision-language models to distribution shifts during inference. We conduct a per-sample analysis of model predictions before and after adaptation, and observe two failure modes in existing TTA methods that echo previous work. Adaptations are frequently negligible, yielding no change in the model's predictions, and more severely, they can be detrimental by flipping previously correct predictions to incorrect ones. This naturally raises a question: Can we identify and skip such negligible or harmful adaptations? In this work, we introduce a new problem of selective adaptation, which aims to determine whether a given test sample should undergo adaptation or be skipped. To this end, we propose Cross-Augmentation Similarity (CAS), a simple baseline that performs adaptation only when predictions across augmented views exhibit low similarity. Notably, CAS not only preserves but in some cases improves overall accuracy, even when skipping nearly 85% of the adaptation process. We hope other researchers will explore this new direction and surpass the performance of our baseline. Our code is available at https://github.com/sirujiang/selective-adaptation.

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) workflows have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex, open-ended tasks through collaborative reasoning among specialized LLM agents, but they incur substantial operating costs due to repeated LLM invocations and long-horizon context accumulation. Existing cascade routing methods make one-shot, query-level decisions and cannot adapt to the dynamic, state-dependent nature of multi-step workflows, in which the right LLM at each step depends on evolving task progress, remaining task difficulty, and cost-efficiency requirements. We present ProgRouter, an online progress-guided routing framework that adaptively selects LLM agents across workflow steps to preserve task-solving quality while adhering to time and cost budgets. ProgRouter introduces a multi-view task progress scorer that combines coarse workflow outcome regimes with fine-grained signals on subtask completion, progress trends, and workflow state quality. Then, a dual-path task progress predictor and an adaptive meta-gating mechanism estimate the progress gain for each candidate routed LLM. ProgRouter makes online step-wise routing decisions that balance progress gain, task time budgets, and long-term operating cost efficiency. Experiments on HumanEval Plus, MBPP, MATH-500, and ASQA, spanning agentic code generation, mathematical reasoning, and retrieval-augmented long-form question answering, demonstrate that ProgRouter reduces the operating cost relative to key baselines while maintaining strong task-solving performance.

Many studies have shown that specially crafted inputs can induce large language models (LLMs) to generate excessively long outputs, resulting in significant computational overhead and resource consumption. While most existing denial-of-service (DoS) attacks target text-only LLMs, end-to-end (E2E) speech LLMs are rapidly emerging. Existing text-based DoS attacks primarily rely on prompt engineering, such as adversarial suffixes or semantic inducement, which exploit the discrete nature of text inputs and therefore cannot be directly transferred to continuous speech inputs. Moreover, prior studies on speech model security mainly focus on ASR or TTS systems, leaving the DoS vulnerability of E2E speech LLMs largely unexplored. To address this gap, we propose the perturbation-based DoS attack targeting E2E speech models. Instead of inducing long outputs through prompt manipulation, our method optimizes imperceptible acoustic perturbations to directly influence the model's autoregressive generation process while preserving the original input length. Specifically, we formulate the attack as a composite optimization objective that jointly suppresses EOS generation, encourages prolonged decoding, and largely preserves semantic consistency by integrating weighted EOS loss, top-k logit loss, length loss, and semantic alignment loss. To further improve stealthiness, we employ voice activity detection (VAD) to inject perturbations only into voiced regions. Extensive experiments on three open-source E2E speech LLMs demonstrate that our method achieves stable attack success rate while significantly increasing generation length and GPU resource consumption, revealing security risks in modern ALLMs.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central paradigm for large language model (LLM) post-training, but optimization toward new objectives can degrade capabilities already present in the base model. KL regularization is widely used to mitigate such forgetting by constraining policy drift toward a reference model. However, standard full-policy KL regularization constrains the entire response distribution and may unnecessarily restrict exploration and target-task learning. This raises a natural question: can a more precise constraint preserve existing capabilities while minimizing interference with learning new tasks? To this end, we propose \underline{Co}rrectness-Conditioned \underline{KL} Regularization (CoKL), a conditional regularization framework that narrows the preservation constraint from the full output distribution to correctness-conditioned response distributions. We instantiate CoKL with forward KL divergence and derive a practical finite-group training objective for RL-based LLM post-training. At the population level, CoKL decouples the total probability assigned to correct responses from their correctness-conditioned distribution, thereby regularizing the relative probability allocation among reference-supported correct responses without directly anchoring incorrect outputs or total correctness mass. We further show that full-policy forward and reverse KL regularization induce a strict optimal correctness gap when the reference policy is imperfect, whereas CoKL avoids this limitation. Experiments in controlled multi-solution environments and continual post-training settings across multiple model scales demonstrate that CoKL achieves a more favorable balance between target-task improvement and prior-capability retention than existing regularization methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lumina04/CoKL.

Novelty is a crucial metric for assessing the quality of academic papers. Scholars strive to highlight the novel aspects of their work, particularly in the title, abstract, and introduction. Peer review, serving as the gatekeeper of scientific rigor, rigorously evaluates the novelty of papers, yet a cognitive gap may exist between author self-promotion and reviewer evaluation. To investigate this, we analyzed 15,328 academic papers published in Nature Communications from 2016 to 2021, along with their peer-review comments. We found that both reviewers and authors emphasize result-oriented innovation, with reviewers adopting a more comprehensive evaluation perspective. Furthermore, by examining promotional intensity against inherent paper novelty, we found that its effect depends on the paper's actual innovation level. Highly innovative papers benefit from stronger promotional language, receiving more positive evaluations. We also found that promotional language significantly correlates with reviewer disagreement on novelty specifically for papers of moderate innovativeness, whereas it has negligible impact for papers with either very high or very low novelty. This reveals how promotional language operates most prominently in the gray area of academic evaluation.

Pipeline parallelism enables training of large language models that exceed single-device memory, yet inter-stage activation communication becomes the dominant bottleneck when trained on low-bandwidth networks. Recent work in this area has proposed using fixed orthogonal projections to compress activations. However, this still results in a significant performance degradation and requires a number of non-standard adaptations to constrain the optimization. A natural alternative is to learn a low rank projection for each pipeline stage, however maintaining the necessary orthogonality of these projectors during training remains a challenge. We present Manifold Aware Projection Learning (MAPL), a method that treats inter-stage compression as a learnable orthogonal projection under explicit Stiefel manifold (orthogonal matrices) constraints. Rather than prescribing a fixed global subspace, MAPL lets each pipeline stage discover and continuously adapt its own task-optimal compression subspace via manifold-constrained steepest descent. To recover token-specific signals at stage boundaries, we introduce per-stage factorized anchor embeddings that allow for full-rank activation reconstruction with negligible communication overhead. We further show that we can incorporate residual vector quantization after projection with a streaming codebook synchronization protocol that amortizes dictionary communication. Across LLaMA models from 150M to 1B parameters we show that MAPL can be easily applied to the existing pipeline and can achieve high compression with neglibile performance degradation with a drastically improved tradeoffs in performance vs. compression compared to Subspace Networks.

Hallucination has recently garnered significant research attention in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) aims to learn directly from the corrected preferences provided by humans, thereby addressing the hallucination issue. Despite its success, this paradigm has yet to specifically target the perceptual bottleneck in attended regions or address insufficient Visual Robustness against image degradation. Furthermore, existing preference pairs are often vision-agnostic and their inherently off-policy nature limits their effectiveness in guiding model learning. To address these challenges, we propose Perceptual Processing Direct Preference Optimization (P$^2$-DPO), a novel training paradigm in which the model generates and learns from its own preference pairs, thereby directly addressing the identified visual bottlenecks while inherently avoiding the issues of vision-agnostic and off-policy data. It introduces: (1) an on-policy preference pairs construction method targeting Focus-and-Enhance perception and Visual Robustness, and (2) a well-designed Calibration Loss to precisely align visual signals with the causal generation of text. Experimental results demonstrate that with a comparable amount of training data and cost, P$^2$-DPO outperforms strong baselines that rely on costly human feedback on benchmarks. Furthermore, evaluations on Attention Region Fidelity (ARF) and image degradation scenarios validate the effectiveness of P$^2$-DPO in addressing perceptual bottleneck in attended regions and improving Visual Robustness against degraded inputs.

Reconstructing visual stimuli from brain recordings has been a meaningful and challenging task in brain decoding. Especially, the achievement of precise and controllable image reconstruction bears great significance in propelling the progress and utilization of brain-computer interfaces. Recent methods, leveraging advances in the power of text-to-image generation models, have reconstructed images that closely approximate complex natural stimuli in terms of semantics (e.g., concepts and objects). However, they struggle to maintain consistency with the original stimuli in fine-grained structural information (e.g., position, orientation and size), which undermines both the controllability and interpretability of the models. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose a two-stage image reconstruction framework, termed MindDiffuser. In Stage 1, Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) text embeddings decoded from brain responses are input into Stable Diffusion, generating a preliminary image containing semantic information. In Stage 2, we use decoded shallow CLIP visual features as supervisory signals, iteratively refining the feature vectors from Stage 1 via backpropagation to align structural information. We conducted extensive experiments on brain response datasets across three modalities (fMRI, EEG, MEG) elicited by visual stimuli, demonstrating that our framework significantly enhances the performance of previous state-of-the-art models, highlighting the effectiveness and versatility of our approach. Spatial and temporal visualization results further support the neurobiological plausibility of our framework, providing guidance for future neural decoding efforts across different brain signal modalities.

We study language generation in the limit under a global preference ordering on strings, as introduced by Kleinberg and Wei. As is done in previous work, we aim for breadth, but impose an additional requirement of timeliness: higher-ranked strings should be generated earlier. A string is then only credited if it is generated before a deadline, where its deadline is defined by a function that maps a string's rank in the target language to the time by which it must be produced. This is in keeping with a central consideration in machine learning, where inductive bias favors simpler'' or more plausible'' outputs, all else being equal. We show that timely generation is impossible in a strong sense for eventually consistent generators -- the protagonists of most prior related work. Under what is perhaps the mildest natural relaxation of consistency, a hallucination rate that vanishes over time, we show that we can circumvent our impossibility result. In particular, we can achieve optimal density with respect to any superlinear deadline function. We also show this is tight by ruling out timely generation with linear deadlines and vanishing hallucination rate.

Large Language Models (LLMs) alter their privacy behavior based on the perceived identity of their interlocutor. While safety mechanisms typically prevent LLMs from releasing Personally Identifiable Information (PII) to human users, these models tend to reveal more sensitive data when addressing another AI agent. We refer to this as the \textbf{Interlocutor Effect}. Through an ablation study, we find evidence that the technical nature of the recipient contributes to this effect, thereby diminishing the model's caution regarding privacy. To explore this further, we introduce the Attention Suppression Hypothesis, which posits that safety-aligned attention heads become inactive during interactions with agents. We assess this quantitatively by comparing human-directed and agent-directed prompts in 222 sensitive scenarios. Our findings, drawn from 3,464 interactions, indicate that portraying the recipient as an AI agent elevates PII leakage by up to 23 percentage points. Initial experiments on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct corroborate this: deactivating one safety head induces leakage, whereas reactivating it reinstates privacy safeguards. We consider the implications for developing secure multi-agent systems.

Large language models cache all previously computed key-value (KV) pairs during generation, and this KV cache grows linearly with sequence length, making it a primary memory bottleneck for serving. Quantizing the KV cache to fewer bits reduces this cost, yet all current quantizers assign the same bit-width to every attention head, ignoring the large variation in head importance. A natural idea is to allocate more bits to important heads and fewer to the rest. We show, however, that such mixed-precision allocation has a hidden pitfall: each quantizer follows a different distortion curve D(b)=alpha*beta^{-b}, and the decay rate beta varies from 3.6 to 5.3 across quantizer designs. Applying one quantizer's distortion model to another inverts the allocation order and makes performance worse than uniform quantization. We call this failure mode distortion model mismatch and propose RateQuant to resolve it. RateQuant fits a per-quantizer distortion model from a small calibration set, then solves the resulting bit-allocation problem in closed form via reverse waterfilling from rate-distortion theory. On Qwen3-8B at 2.5 average bits, calibrated RateQuant reduces KIVI's perplexity from 49.3 to 14.9 (70% reduction) and improves QuaRot by 6.6 PPL. The entire calibration takes 1.6 s on a single GPU and adds zero overhead at inference time.

We present Exposía, the first public dataset that connects writing and feedback in higher education, enabling research on educationally grounded computational approaches to teaching and evaluating academic writing. Exposía includes student research project proposals and peer and instructor feedback consisting of comments and free-text reviews. The dataset was collected in the "Introduction to Scientific Work" course of the Computer Science. Exposía reflects the multi-stage nature of the academic writing process that includes drafting, receiving feedback, and revising the writing based on the feedback received. Both the project proposals and peer feedback are accompanied by human assessment scores based on a fine-grained, pedagogically-grounded schema for writing and feedback assessment that we develop. We use Exposía to benchmark state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on two tasks: automated scoring of (1) the proposals and (2) the student reviews. We find that the two tasks are best served by different LLMs. Furthermore, closed-source models consistently outperform open-weight models, motivating further research on improving the performance of open-weight models preferred in classroom settings. Finally, we establish that a prompting strategy that scores multiple aspects of the writing together is the most effective, paving the way for more effective classroom deployment of modern LLMs.

Large language models trained recursively on their own or other models' outputs undergo model collapse, in which distributional tails and factual accuracy deteriorate while fluency survives. Prior work diagnoses collapse after training; the actionable problem is screening a corpus of unknown provenance before training. We introduce SynthSentry, a corpus-level, model-agnostic contamination signal requiring no access to the generating model, no generation history, and no synthetic labels. The score is a distributional divergence over three statistics: lexical diversity collapse, n-gram tail truncation, and perplexity variance across reference models. We evaluate on corpora contaminated by small open-weight generators and an instruction-tuned open-weight model under a leave-one-generator-out protocol. A domain-stratified study measures false positives on naturally repetitive human text (legal, clinical, source code). The score ranks corpora by severity with little loss when whole generator families are held out. Per-domain calibration holds near its nominal false-positive budget once covariance shrinkage and a bootstrap threshold replace a naive quantile, which runs four times over budget. A downstream fine-tuning check showed no contamination-driven accuracy deficit at our scale, so whether pruning recovers one remains open; the same run shows over-pruning risk once pruning exceeds the true contamination fraction. We frame screening as a data-curation defense rather than a post-hoc diagnosis and release the scoring toolkit. All results are small-scale; scope is English-language, batch-mode corpus screening. Contamination sources are single-generation or hand-authored rather than recursively generated, so results speak to synthetic contamination generally and not to recursion depth.

Modern autonomous vehicles are equipped with multiple sensors, such as cameras, LiDAR, and radar, for comprehensive environmental perception. However, robust cross-modal feature fusion remains a critical challenge, as the reliability of each sensor varies significantly across diverse real-world driving conditions, including poor visibility and adverse weather. While uncertainty quantification (UQ) mitigates this issue by allowing models to prioritize reliable signals, existing uncertainty-aware fusion methods typically rely on simple feature-level uncertainty estimates and thus often fail to generalize effectively in complex, out-of-distribution scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose CRUISE, a novel uncertainty-aware cross-modal sensor fusion framework. CRUISE integrates a vision-language model (VLM)-guided UQ module that generates fine-grained, pixel-level uncertainty estimates. By leveraging the VLM's rich prior knowledge and superior contextual reasoning, our approach provides a highly informative guide for the fusion process. Furthermore, we introduce a dynamic adaptive mechanism that explicitly models and captures cross-modal dependencies, ensuring the framework fully exploits the inherent complementary nature of multi-sensor inputs.

A range of methods aim to enhance the performance of vision-language models (VLMs) at test time. Among them, transduction has emerged as a promising paradigm due to its strong compatibility and efficiency. However, realistic evaluations often involve highly imbalanced class distributions, which cause performance degradation or even collapse. In this work, we systematically revisit transduction from the perspective of penalized likelihood estimation (PLE), showing that PLE with a KL-divergence anchor term naturally yields an adaptive shrinkage behavior between prior anchors and empirical estimates. From this viewpoint, the brittleness of transductive methods can be attributed to the absence of anchoring mechanism and static modeling of the shrinkage strength. Therefore, we propose Mixture of Von Mises-Fisher Models with Dynamic Shrinkage (MOON). MOON is built upon a mixture of von Mises-Fisher distributions to model feature representations on the unit hypersphere. To handle imbalance, MOON dynamically adjusts the shrinkage strength using zero-shot priors at both instance and class levels. Thus, it suppresses unreliable assignments and prevents harmful updates from outlier classes, thereby mitigating negative transfer. MOON is model-agnostic, training-free, and requires no task-specific hyperparameter tuning. Extensive experiments further validate the advantage of MOON in both performance and efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/walawalagoose/MOON