Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle

The environmental impact of deep learning has attracted increasing attention over the past decade. Existing studies mainly focus on the energy and carbon emissions of model training and inference, while the whole development phase is often overlooked. Yet, architecture prototyping and intensive experiments are conducted during this stage, which is highly energy-demanding. In this article, we propose a methodology to estimate these costs, based on activity logs from the Grid5000 shared computing platform used by the LORIA laboratory. As a case-study, we focus on audio projects developed in the Multispeech research team. We evaluate the overall energy cost of four projects, and we compare them to those of training the reported models. Our results show that the energy required for the development phase is 3 to 256 times greater than that required to train the best-performing model alone. These results advocate for a more systematic reporting of energy consumption across the entire life cycle of deep learning-based audio projects.

As the capabilities and ubiquity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, so does their environmental footprint. Despite calls for responsible AI, the machine learning community lacks standardised practices for carbon accounting. Our automated literature review of the 5,285 papers accepted to NeurIPS 2025 reveals that reporting of environmental impact is nearly non-existent. To catalyse a shift toward sustainable AI, we define standardised sustainability metrics for evaluating model training efficiency, accompanied by simple heuristics to estimate the carbon cost of LLM inference. We implement these metrics in carbonbenchmark, a drop-in software solution for tracking and reporting emissions. Finally, to combat the pursuit of marginal accuracy gains at disproportionate environmental costs, we formalise the Smallest Model that Achieves the Job' (SMAJ), a framework which challenges the field to prioritise computational efficiency and environmental accountability alongside traditional State-of-the-Art' (SotA) accuracy.

A central aim of neuromorphic computing is to provide a viable alternative to highly energy-intensive Transformer-based AI. However, efficient alternatives struggle to capture the set of qualities that have secured the Transformer's status as the de facto standard in sequence modelling. Any realistic contender must be data-adaptive, able to capture long-range dependencies, and GPU-parallelisable, but also non-linearly recurrent to enable complex reasoning. Based on evidence suggesting the auditory cortex operates on fixed timescales, this work proposes the ADaptive with Prescriptive Timescales Network (ADPTNet) as a potential solution to achieving all four properties simultaneously. ADPTNet is built around local topological conjugates, obtained by a novel combination of linear attention and Riemannian optimisation, applied to static global dynamics. This enables non-linear yet predictable long-term behaviour. Dynamical systems theory proofs provide theoretical guarantees for the parametric control of ADPTNet's timescales (its Lyapunov spectrum). ADPTNet improves performance on Selective Copying over Hawk, the existing method balancing long-range memory and adaptability, while also improving state tracking over linear SSMs like Mamba. On sequential CIFAR-10, ADPTNet matches linear SSM accuracy and outperforms existing selective models (incl. the Transformer), using fewer parameters. We also introduce a neuromorphic SpikingADPTNet, which achieves a new state-of-the-art accuracy on the Spiking Speech Commands dataset ($83.56\%\pm0.15$). Finally, ADPTNet's constant timescales enable two efficient, Jacobian-free extensions to the DEER parallel simulation algorithm (Conv and Forward DEER) that retain the same average convergence. Conv DEER adds no computational overhead beyond the network's forward pass and enables non-linear RNN parallelisation via iterated convolutions for the first time.

Machine learning plays an increasingly vital role in engineering, but the corresponding increase in compute time is not without environmental cost. Physics-informed machine learning or "grey-box" models have been developed to overcome some of the limitations of traditional black-box learners, utilising the physical insight that an engineer would have about the structure they are modelling and have shown promising results in the structural engineering field among many others. This work explores whether an additional advantage could be a reduced environmental impact, considering the relationship between training data quantity and training time, linking this duration to carbon emissions from computing. In a structural health monitoring context, four physics-informed machine learning approaches - spanning Gaussian processes and neural networks - are evaluated: residual modelling, input augmentation, hybrid modelling, and constrained learning. The emissions for training each of the models to reach a given error threshold is compared, and in most examples, shown to be lower for the physics-informed models (with input augmented models being an exception). This reduction in training emissions further compounds the environmental savings achieved by collecting and storing less data. Although promising results, we cannot expect a silver bullet and the case studies demonstrate that a trade-off is needed between the increased complexity that comes from introducing physics into a machine learner, against the gain from reduced training data requirements.

Bias in AI systems is typically framed as a flaw to be minimized, yet it also serves as a critical indicator of underlying weaknesses in data, modeling assumptions, and system design. Existing approaches often treat bias as an isolated problem rather than as evidence that can strengthen verification and governance across the AI lifecycle. This paper aims to reconceptualize bias as a diagnostic tool that supports rigorous AI verification. We seek to develop a multidimensional framework to analyze bias, demonstrate how biases emerge in both Traditional and Generative AI, and provide a structured pathway for verification-driven mitigation. We present a multidimensional framework analyzing bias across four dimensions: origin sources, emergence points throughout the AI modeling lifecycle, technical and methodological causes, and validation approaches for detection and mitigation. Through a comprehensive typology spanning traditional and generative AI systems, we demonstrate how biases manifest and propagate across development stages. Our analysis encompasses 30 distinct bias types, 16 verification methods, and 20 countermeasures, providing an actionable roadmap for practitioners. We introduce a hierarchical evidence framework that distinguishes internal validity (mechanistic integrity of AI systems) from external validity (contextual reliability in deployment environments). The framework reveals how biases manifest and propagate across modeling stages, enabling systematic mapping between bias types, verification techniques, and effective countermeasures. The proposed evidence hierarchy clarifies how different verification strategies contribute to mechanistic integrity and contextual reliability. We advocate for ''Ethics by Design'' principles that integrate bias verification throughout the development lifecycle, enabling the construction of fairer, more robust, and trustworthy AI systems.

As artificial intelligence systems increasingly rely on distributed and collaborative training, the energy footprint of these processes becomes a shared responsibility. Modern AI training often unfolds across heterogeneous compute nodes-ranging from cloud clusters to edge devices-whose energy availability is spatially and temporally variable. At the same time, renewable energy grids experience growing levels of excess generation, creating opportunities to align computational workloads with low-carbon energy supply. In this work, we develop a game-theoretic model of carbon-aware AI training in which autonomous agents strategically choose whether to participate and how intensively to train under limited renewable energy availability. Each agent balances diminishing learning returns, rewards for remaining within green-energy budgets, and penalties for grid consumption. While our framework applies broadly to distributed AI training, we examine Federated Learning as a representative case study due to its decentralized structure and flexible scheduling. We analyze equilibrium existence, efficiency, and adaptive dynamics, and provide simulation evidence that appropriately designed incentives can eliminate grid-based energy usage while preserving model performance. Our findings demonstrate how incentive-compatible training mechanisms can enhance energy efficiency and sharply reduce carbon emissions under renewable-energy constraints.

As machine learning and artificial intelligence find their way into nearly every aspect of climate, weather, and Earth system modeling, it is worth pausing to consider what our design decisions imply for the science and for the computational resources we consume. A growing body of literature addresses the ethical and sustainable development of ML/AI, yet translating these principles into day-to-day research practice remains a challenge as most of best practices are dispersed across multiple studies and commentaries. Here, we distill these discussions into a practical checklist that ML/AI and Earth system science practitioners can use to assess and reduce the environmental footprint of their own applications, organised around the successive stages of the model development pipeline. We complement the checklist with a selection of metrics drawn from the literature for estimating the energy consumption and carbon footprint of a project. For each question, we point to concrete examples and actionable suggestions from recent literature, aiming to bridge the gap between aspirational principles and the decisions researchers face at every stage of the development cycle.

In an era defined by escalating climate change and the pervasive deployment of edge intelligence, the environmental cost of semiconductor manufacturing and operation has reached a critical threshold. As Deep Learning (DL) accelerators dominate System-on-Chip (SoC) die area, achieving true sustainability requires a paradigm shift from static worst-case efficiency to dynamic energy-proportionality. This paper introduces Eco-SoC, a highly scalable VLSI architecture co-designed specifically for sustainable artificial intelligence. We propose a hardware-level Dynamic Precision-Scaling Logic (DPSL) framework that adaptively modulates bit-width precision based on real-time activation sparsity, successfully reducing switching activity by up to 42% on a commercial 7nm FinFET process node. Furthermore, we transcend traditional Power-Performance-Area (PPA) metrics by providing a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using the Architectural Carbon footprint Tool (ACT). Our synthesis demonstrates that Eco-SoC offsets its increased embodied carbon footprint (a marginal 4.8% area overhead) within 1.1 years of edge deployment. Finally, by introducing a thermal-aware power gating mechanism that mitigates localized hotspots, Eco-SoC doubles the projected Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) of the silicon, providing a tangible, scalable strategy for electronic waste (e-waste) mitigation in next-generation computing systems.

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer a promising pathway to energy-efficient AI and brain-inspired computing. However, their widespread adoption is hindered by a lack of fast, accessible, and versatile simulation frameworks. In this paper, we introduce SuperNeuroMAT, an open-source, scalable, and highly efficient Python-based SNN simulator. We devise a novel matrix-based approach to model the leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron dynamics and natively support dense and sparse execution modes. This enables fast simulation of approximately 10,000 neurons in dense mode and 100,000 neurons in sparse mode on standard laptops and desktops without requiring specialized hardware. We demonstrate that SuperNeuroMAT consistently outperforms four established SNN simulators---NEST, Brian2, BindsNET, and snnTorch---on two performance metrics (execution speed and peak resident memory) and across various network sizes and connection probabilities. Furthermore, we demonstrate SuperNeuroMAT's applicability across a diverse set of problems. SuperNeuroMAT can efficiently handle conventional machine learning benchmarks such as the Digits and citation network datasets as well as neuromorphic event-based vision tasks such as N-CARS and ASL-DVS. Moreover, it can be extended beyond machine learning workloads and facilitate general-purpose workloads. We validated this by implementing the neuromorphic shortest path algorithm and two arithmetic primitives (addition and multiplication). SuperNeuroMAT can be installed via the Python Package Index (PyPI), thereby lowering the barrier to entry into the field of neuromorphic computing and accelerating the broader development of neuromorphic algorithms.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have become powerful tools for supporting and automating complex human tasks. Despite their benefits, growing attention has been directed toward their environmental implications, primarily due to their high energy demands and associated carbon emissions. This concern is particularly relevant in light of the increasing deployment of large-scale models, especially Deep Learning (DL) architectures, which provide advanced predictive capabilities but require substantial computational resources. This paper presents a systematic review of research on Green AI, Green DL, and optimization techniques aimed at reducing the environmental impact of AI models. In addition, we examine and compare several carbon measurement tools for estimating emissions generated by AI algorithms. To complement the review, we conducted an empirical evaluation using a CPU-based experimental setup, in which six DL models were implemented for a multi-label classification task. The objective was to quantify and compare their overall carbon emissions and to determine which stages of the DL lifecycle contribute most significantly to the total footprint. The results show that the training phase is the primary source of emissions. Moreover, the findings reveal that increased architectural complexity does not systematically translate into proportional accuracy gains, highlighting the importance of carefully balancing predictive performance and environmental cost. These results reinforce the need to integrate sustainability considerations into model selection and AI system design.

AI systems can fail silently. The failure propagates through training loops, evaluation pipelines, and production monitoring stacks until downstream harm makes it visible. This paper introduces evaluation blindness: a measurement function M exhibits evaluation blindness with respect to failure class F when it produces readings indistinguishable from a healthy state while the system is actually failing, with no auxiliary signal flagging the gap. The problem surfaces at two lifecycle stages the literature has treated separately. At training time, reward models are gamed, importance-sampling corrections are silently miscalculated, and benchmark contamination inflates fine-tuning evaluations, all while loss curves look healthy and gradient updates proceed normally. At deployment time, monitoring fails to catch six classes of production failure, including an Operational category that is 100% silent by structural definition. We provide a formal detectability predicate unifying both stages. Four training-time case studies trace concrete breakdowns, including a real implementation bug in TRL PR #6594 where gradients are corrupted as loss decreases normally. A six-class taxonomy validated against 50 real-world incidents from court documents and regulatory filings finds that 53% of verifiable public failures were silent. A failure budget framework ties acceptable failure rates to use-case risk class. The implication is direct: measurement infrastructure is a correctness concern across the full AI lifecycle, not just at evaluation time. Data, code, and taxonomy schema are at https://github.com/priyanka25aug/llm-failure-taxonomy.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly central to power and energy systems, supporting modeling, forecasting, optimization, and control. Yet most existing works emphasize specialized applications and offer little reusable material for newcomers or interdisciplinary learners, who increasingly rely on large language models rather than building their own. This gap points to a need for engineering-grounded AI (EGAI), in which AI workflows follow established engineering and power-system domain rules rather than acting as task-agnostic black boxes. Motivated by a community survey of researchers and practitioners, which shows 92% report at least one barrier before running an AI model and 94% want a power-specific hands-on course. This paper presents a framework consisting of open, executable module library that lowers the entry barrier for AI in power systems. The modules follow a progressive difficulty ladder that maps core AI concepts onto representative power-system tasks: (i) foundational deep neural network (DNN) templates for function approximation and load-curve fitting; (ii) a domain-coupled convolutional neural network (CNN) power-flow surrogate for a 5-bus system; and (iii) frontier modules on DNN-assisted optimization, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for battery storage control, and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for the swing equation. All modules are released as Jupyter notebooks that run locally or on Google Colab and are delivered through an IEEE online course and IEEE Power & Energy Society (PES) webinar series. The webinar drew more than 590 live attendees, which is among the ten most-attended IEEE PES webinars, and over 344 repository visits within two weeks, reinforcing the survey-based motivation.

Thermodynamic computing is an emerging hardware paradigm, in which stochastic physical dynamics serve as the direct computational primitive. The recent explosion of generative AI has only sharpened the search for alternative approaches to compute, and, as we show in this work, thermodynamic computing turns out to be well suited to this space. An important class of methods realises a function as the stationary expectation of an ergodic stochastic process: the answer is encoded in the time-averaged statistics of an equilibrating trajectory. To date, this equilibration-style class has been formulated exclusively through Langevin dynamics, restricting its implementations to analogue substrates and the engineering challenges those bring. In this work, we propose a substrate-independent formalisation of the equilibration-style formulation, in which the only object of design is the dynamical generator L* of an arbitrary ergodic process. The formalisation makes three hardware-level properties of the formulation explicit: the precision of a result is a knob set by how long the dynamics are run, sample averages decompose across independent trajectories, and dependent stages of a computation operate concurrently rather than serially, a property we call sequential parallelism. We instantiate the formalisation by fabricating a prototype digital thermodynamic computing chip, named CN101, that implements the formulation through discrete accumulator dynamics on standard CMOS using stochastic computing principles. We characterise CN101's success across conventional generative AI workloads in the form of VAEs and flow matching, applied to both image generation and scientific problems. Together, the formalisation and its digital instantiation show that the equilibration-style formulation is substrate-independent, and that its computational properties can be exploited on standard digital hardware.

Physical AI refers to AI systems that understand, reason about, and act in accordance with the physical world and its underlying laws, dynamics, and constraints. Unlike conventional AI systems, physical AI interacts continuously with uncertain physical environments, and its actions produce consequences that are physically irreversible. As existing trustworthy AI frameworks have been developed primarily for digital AI systems, they do not fully capture the distinctive challenges of physical AI, such as physical safety, cyber-physical security, and physical manufacturing process. To address this gap, we present a survey of trustworthy physical AI principles. First, we characterize the core capabilities and challenges of physical AI. Second, we examine the role of physics in AI. Third, we trace the end-to-end physical AI life cycle across five core stages and introduce Trustworthy Physical AI Operationalization (T-PAIO). Fourth, we develop the Trustworthy Physical AI (T-PAI) framework, a theoretical framework that organizes key trustworthiness principles and provides a foundation for governing trustworthy physical AI systems.

The widespread adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to increasing concerns about energy consumption, yet there is a lack of standardized methodologies to accurately estimate AI inference energy consumption, particularly across various tasks and architectures. In this study, we propose a task independent, layer-wise energy estimation model for AI architectures. Our model is evaluated on a large dataset of more than 100,000 layers for 295 neural network architectures across 3 widely-used tasks and 3 distinct hardware platforms. Our approach achieves a median error of 19.6%, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. We further show that layer-wise decomposition generalize to new tasks without complete retraining, by leveraging shared layers across architectures. It offer tools, insights and a precise methodology to empower stakeholders in designing energy-efficient AI systems.

The interpretation phase of life cycle assessment often lacks structured mechanisms for translating quantified improvement opportunities addressing environmental hotspots into actionable strategic pathways under technological, social, and policy uncertainty. To overcome this limitation, this study introduces a perspective-conditioned retrieval-augmented generation framework for LCA interpretation, where a multi-perspective retrieval and controlled synthesis is incorporated in the artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted LCA. To operationalise large language models in LCA interpretation, a perspective fusion RAG architecture was developed, covering academic, industry, public discourse, and European union (EU) funding datasets. Our approach comprises three steps: (1) a scenario anchor defining system boundaries and decarbonization targets, (2) a set of perspective-specific micro-queries with constrained retrieval, and (3) a neutral synthesis step integrating only ledger-stored outputs without further retrieval. The framework is demonstrated through a hydrogen-enabled diesel reduction use case in an Italian apple production facility using GPT-5 nano as the reasoning model. Overall, the structured retrieval and constrained synthesis are designed to mitigate the risk of hallucination while preserving cross-domain diversity. The approach presented can support more disciplined translation of impact results into strategic pathways and opens up new avenues for the use of advanced AI tools in LCA studies, particularly those focused on technologies that could be deployed at scale. This proof-of-concept demonstrates how AI-assisted, evidence-grounded interpretation can support implementation-oriented decision-making beyond conventional LCA studies.

Future 6G networks will rely on highly distributed, AI-native Radio Access Networks (RANs), where communication and AI workloads share a common infrastructure. This evolution, combined with increasing deployment density and continuous AI processing, is expected to significantly increase RAN energy consumption. While Open RAN (O-RAN) introduces a programmable and modular control framework through the RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC) and Service Management and Orchestration (SMO), current approaches remain largely policy-driven, limiting adaptive energy-aware coordination across multiple applications. In parallel, AI-RAN promotes the convergence of AI and RAN infrastructures through AI-for-RAN, AI-on-RAN, and AI-and-RAN paradigms, yet efficient mechanisms to jointly orchestrate performance, latency, and energy remain an open challenge. This article proposes an agentic AI-native RAN architecture that bridges O-RAN's structured control with AI-RAN's unified vision. Leveraging semantic intent abstraction and Large Language Model (LLM)-driven coordination, the framework enables adaptive orchestration, conflict resolution, and energy-aware multi-objective optimization across heterogeneous workloads. Through representative AI-for-RAN and AI-on-RAN use cases, we show how such coordination can improve resource efficiency and reduce operational energy consumption, paving the way toward sustainable 6G networks.

We present a holistic methodology for artificial intelligence algorithm and accelerator co-design, co-search, and co-generation (A3C3), which jointly optimizes neural network architectures and their hardware implementations to address the inefficiencies of traditional top-down AI system design flows. Conventional AI deployment often treats model design and hardware mapping as separate stages: an algorithm is first developed for accuracy, and only afterward adapted to meet latency, throughput, energy, or resource constraints. This separation can lead to suboptimal systems, particularly as modern AI workloads become increasingly heterogeneous, memory-intensive, and platform-dependent. A3C3 instead parameterizes both algorithmic and accelerator design spaces and searches them jointly, enabling the automatic generation of model-accelerator pairs that better balance accuracy, latency, throughput, energy efficiency, and hardware utilization. This article is a book chapter of the Handbook of Embedded Machine Learning, edited by Sudeep Pasricha and Muhammad Shafique, Springer Nature.

Agentic AI systems act through tools and sub-agents, yet the controls meant to bound their financial and environmental cost still sit on dashboards evaluated beside or after execution. Green SARC applies the SARC governance-by-architecture framework -- four enforcement sites in the agent loop -- to FinOps and GreenOps, contributing the theory of what to enforce and how to predict it. We report four policy-independent results. (i) The unconstrained "State Snowball" is $Θ(n^2)$ in loop depth; on 3,000 real multi-step plans (SWE-rebench) it holds on 100%, with median curvature $\hat{c}_2=216$ exceeding the linear-accretion prediction $p/2=134$ -- real plans accrete faster than the model. (ii) On real residuals the Normal-$σ$ gate under-covers (92% at nominal 95%); split-conformal calibration holds (95.2%). (iii) A soft Lagrangian penalty tuned to the budget in expectation breaches it on 91.5% of seeds; the architectural gate breaches 0%. (iv) Under binding budgets the gate's over-budget incidence is 0% on synthetic and real (BurstGPT) arrivals. End-to-end token/USD/carbon savings (47--55%) are real but policy-dependent in magnitude -- set by a scope-cap knob, not by gate rejections. The library is open-source, dependency-free, and ships a regeneration script for every cited number.

LLM-powered chatbots are increasingly embedded in everyday workflows, raising sustainability concerns due to their energy use. Most mitigation strategies emphasize model or infrastructure efficiency, while the user-interface (UI) layer remains underexplored despite its potential to shape interaction behavior. We investigate whether sustainability-oriented UI interventions can increase users' energy awareness and encourage more energy-responsible chatbot use without reducing usability. We first conducted a baseline survey with 77 participants to assess awareness and receptiveness to intervention concepts. Guided by prior work on persuasive technology and choice architecture, we implemented a web-based chatbot prototype with a three-mode switch (Energy-efficient, Balanced, Performance), per-response energy feedback, pre-send energy estimates, a usage metrics dashboard, and energy analogies. We then evaluated the prototype in a five-day field study with 11 participants. In the baseline survey, 94.8% of respondents reported at least some awareness of AI energy use, yet 88.3% misestimated actual consumption. Although concern about environmental impact was high, only 39.0% indicated willingness to accept a performance trade-off for lower energy use. In the field study, Energy-efficient mode accounted for 55.8% of logged prompts, while 90.9% self-reported actively choosing Eco-mode when high accuracy was not required. Participants did not reduce prompt length, suggesting mode switching as the primary behavioral mechanism. Sustainability-oriented UI interventions can improve awareness and support more energy-responsible interaction patterns in LLM chatbots. These effects are best interpreted as behavioral and model-based estimates that complement backend efficiency work, and the provided prototype and replication package support further research on energy-aware conversational AI design.

Deep-learning speaker verification (SV) increasingly relies on deep neural network backbones, whose environmental impact remains largely undocumented. In this paper, we conduct an evaluation of ResNet architectures trained on VoxCeleb2, varying depth, channel width, and stage distribution, and measure energy consumption and carbon footprint using node-level sensors. Results show a clear point of diminishing returns: deeper or wider models bring only marginal accuracy gains while energy consumption grows steeply. In contrast, mid-sized networks such as ResNet-50 and stage-concentrated variants achieve favorable trade-offs between performance and environmental impact. These findings provide actionable guidelines for designing energy-efficient SV systems.

Proper accounting of the energy requirements and environmental impact of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is necessary for researchers, developers, policy makers, and users to assess the barriers to building systems at scale. With the growing complexity of pipelines and underlying infrastructure needed to develop and deploy AI systems, previous approaches for evaluating AI efficiency which focus on the costs of a single training run or an individual inference prediction are no longer sufficient. In this position paper, we enunciate the need for applying life cycle assessment to evaluate the costs of the machine learning model development and deployment pipeline to properly account for the required resources and downstream impact. Life cycle assessments enable the incorporation of costs across the full life cycle of an AI system and its underlying infrastructure, from the embodied costs associated with the physical computing hardware through the operational costs in training and inference.

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) life cycle requires a thorough understanding of the underlying data dynamics for robust, safe and cost-effective AI development and use. Dataset shifts are defined as changes between train and test data distributions. Whether occurring over time (temporal) or across different sites (multi-source), they can severely degrade model performance and compromise data quality. This is particularly important in health AI, where the safety and fundamental rights of patients can be severely affected by uncontrolled shifts both at training and operational stages. While the theoretical foundations of covariate, prior, and concept shifts are well established, there is a lack of accessible and comprehensive software tools to perform their analysis. We introduce dashi, an open-source Python library designed for the exploration, quantification, and characterization of dataset shifts. dashi provides a dual approach: an unsupervised approach that leverages information geometry and non-parametric statistical manifolds to data variability characterization and analysis (e.g., Information Geometric Temporal plots and Multi-Source Variability metrics like Global Probabilistic Deviation and Source Probabilistic Outlyingness), and a supervised approach that quantifies and characterizes model performance degradation. Both unsupervised and supervised approaches work across user-defined temporal and domain/source batches. We demonstrate the utility of dashi on three simulated and real-world health AI case studies on gestational diabetes mellitus, COVID-19 and emergency medical dispatch. By providing interactive visual analytics and variability metrics, dashi supports trustworthiness of AI life cycle stages enabling robust and safe machine learning pipelines through the assessment of data coherence and AI performance.

Distribution utilities are now expected to deliver bills that customers can actually read attach a defensible carbon number to every kWh sold and schedule load against grid stress and emissions constraints We propose an end-to-end framework that unifies four production-grade capabilities under one architectural roof a generative-AI agent that drafts each customers natural-language billing statement from structured numeric inputs under a constrained decoding policy a transformer-based forecaster that supplies the day-ahead consumption estimate with calibrated quantile bands

Reducing power consumption in AI accelerators is increasingly important. Approximate computing can reduce power consumption while keeping the accuracy loss small. Since multipliers are power-hungry components in AI models, this paper focuses on synthesizing low-power approximate multipliers (AxMs). Unlike prior works that design AxMs separately from AI model training, we present TRAM, which jointly optimizes the AxM structure and AI model parameters to lower power with small accuracy loss. Experiments show that compared to state-of-the-art AxMs, TRAM achieves up to 25.05% AxM power reduction on CNNs with CIFAR-10, and reduces power by up to 27.09% on vision transformers with ImageNet.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, encompassing both traditional machine learning (ML) and more advanced approaches such as deep learning and large language models (LLMs), play a central role in modern applications. AI model lifecycle management involves the end-to-end process of managing these models, from data collection and preparation to model building, evaluation, deployment, and continuous monitoring. This process is inherently complex, as it requires the coordination of diverse services that manage AI artifacts such as datasets, dataflows, and models, all orchestrated to operate seamlessly. In this context, it is essential to isolate applications from the complexity of interacting with heterogeneous services, datasets, and AI platforms. In this paper, we introduce Gypscie, a cross-platform AI artifact management system. By providing a unified view of all AI artifacts, the Gypscie platform simplifies the development and deployment of AI applications. This unified view is realized through a knowledge graph that captures application semantics and a rule-based query language that supports reasoning over data and models. Model lifecycle activities are represented as high-level dataflows that can be scheduled across multiple platforms, such as servers, cloud platforms, or supercomputers. Finally, Gypscie records provenance information about the artifacts it produces, thereby enabling explainability. Our qualitative comparison with representative AI systems shows that Gypscie supports a broader range of functionalities across the AI artifact lifecycle. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that Gypscie can successfully optimize and schedule dataflows on AI platforms from an abstract specification.

Medical edge-AI systems must operate under a difficult tension: delivering reliable diagnostic inference while running on devices with limited battery capacity, memory, and compute. In dermatology, this problem is amplified by real-world image degradation caused by smartphone capture, poor lighting, blur, compression, and heterogeneous edge sensors. To handle these degraded inputs, deploying a heavyweight model can improve reliability, but it rapidly increases the energy burden on resource-constrained devices. Conversely, always using a lightweight model saves energy but may be less reliable on ambiguous or degraded inputs. This paper introduces EcoFair, a vertically partitioned inference framework for dermatology classification in which image and tabular inputs remain local to edge clients while only learned modality-specific representations are transmitted for server-side fusion. EcoFair first processes each sample using a lightweight image encoder and then decides whether additional heavyweight computation is necessary. Escalation is triggered when the lightweight prediction exhibits high uncertainty, a narrow separation between safe and high-risk classes, or elevated metadata-derived risk from patient age and lesion location. Across HAM10000, BCN20000, and PAD-UFES-20, EcoFair is evaluated using multiple lightweight--heavy backbone pairings to quantify the trade-off between energy consumption, diagnostic performance, and worst-group malignant-case recall. Results show that EcoFair can reduce per-sample image-inference energy by up to 68% relative to always using the heavyweight encoder, while selectively allocating additional computation under difficult data regimes to support inference reliability. Group-level analysis further shows configuration-dependent effects, with improvements in selected model--dataset settings and mixed behaviour in others.

AI and renewable energy are increasingly framed as a "power couple," on the premise that surging AI demand will accelerate clean-energy investment, yet concerns persist that AI will entrench fossil-fuel carbon lock-in. We reconcile these views by modeling the equilibrium between AI growth and renewable investment. In a parsimonious game, a policymaker designs policies that guide investment in renewable capacity for AI, while an AI developer chooses its model's capability. The equilibrium depends on scaling regimes and market incentives. When the market payoff to capability is supermodular and performance gains are near-linear in compute (so the market rewards capability at least as fast as scaling raises its energy cost), developers push toward frontier scale even when the marginal megawatt-hour is fossil-based. In this regime, renewable expansion mainly relaxes scaling constraints rather than displacing fossil generation; clean capacity remains insufficient and fossil dependence persists. This yields an "adaptation trap": as climate damages rise, the value of AI-enabled adaptation increases, which strengthens incentives to enable frontier scaling while tolerating residual fossil use. When AI faces diminishing returns and lower scaling efficiency (so energy requirements outrun the market value of capability), energy costs discipline capability choices; renewable investment then both enables capability and decarbonizes marginal compute, generating an "adaptation pathway" in which climate stress spurs clean-capacity expansion toward a carbon-free equilibrium. A calibrated case study illustrates both mechanisms using observed magnitudes. The findings suggest that effective AI decarbonization requires policies that keep clean capacity binding at the margin as compute expands.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly shape consequential decisions, creating value but also potential harms for individuals, social groups, and society. This has prompted calls for proactive approaches that anticipate harms early in the AI lifecycle. Although prior research identifies AI biases as sources of harm, the associations between particular lifecycle biases and harms remain insufficiently understood. We introduce \texttt{ECHO}, a systematic, context-sensitive, and participatory framework that anchors early harm anticipation in lifecycle biases and elicits their perceived associations with potential harms.\texttt{ECHO} identifies domain-specific stakeholders, instantiates biases through vignettes, collects harm judgements from human participants and a large language model (LLM), and organises them into descriptive and inferential ethical matrices. Applied to disease diagnosis and hiring, \texttt{ECHO} surfaced non-uniform, context-sensitive bias--harm patterns indicating which harms were perceived as plausible consequences of particular AI biases. The theoretical interpretability of these patterns and the inferential support for specific associations strengthen the plausibility of the mappings. By linking stakeholder-specific anticipated harms to lifecycle biases, \texttt{ECHO} supports source-level harm anticipation and provides structured input to subsequent AI governance actions

Federated Learning (FL) holds the potential to advance equality in health by enabling diverse institutions to collaboratively train deep learning (DL) models, even with limited data. However, the significant resource requirements of FL often exclude centres with limited computational infrastructure, further widening existing healthcare disparities. To address this issue, we propose a Green AI-oriented adaptive layer-freezing strategy designed to reduce energy consumption and computational load while maintaining model performance. We tested our approach using different federated architectures for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-to-Computed Tomography (CT) conversion. The proposed adaptive strategy optimises the federated training by selectively freezing the encoder weights based on the monitored relative difference of the encoder weights from round to round. A patience-based mechanism ensures that freezing only occurs when updates remain consistently minimal. The energy consumption and CO2eq emissions of the federation were tracked using the CodeCarbon library. Compared to equivalent non-frozen counterparts, our approach reduced training time, total energy consumption and CO2eq emissions by up to 23%. At the same time, the MRI-to-CT conversion performance was maintained, with only small variations in the Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Notably, for three out of the five evaluated architectures, no statistically significant differences were observed, while two architectures exhibited statistically significant improvements. Our work aligns with a research paradigm that promotes DL-based frameworks meeting clinical requirements while ensuring climatic, social, and economic sustainability. It lays the groundwork for novel FL evaluation frameworks, advancing privacy, equity and, more broadly, justice in AI-driven healthcare.

The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has taken a tight hold on broad aspects of society, industry, business, and governance in ways that dictate the prosperity and might of the world's economies. The AI market size is projected to grow from {$}189 billion in 2023 to {$}4.8 trillion by 2033. Currently, AI is dominated by large language models (LLMs) that exhibit linguistic and visual intelligence. However, training these models requires a massive amount of data scraped from the web as well as large amounts of energy (50-60 GWh to train GPT-4). Despite these costs, these models often hallucinate, a characteristic that prevents them from being deployed in critical application domains. In contrast, the human brain consumes only 20W of power. What is needed is the next level of AI evolution in which lightweight domain-specific multimodal models, especially compact models with 10--20B parameters for bounded domains, with higher levels of intelligence can reason, plan, and make decisions in dynamic environments with real-time data and prior knowledge, while learning continuously and evolving in ways that enhance future decision-making capability. This will define the next wave of AI, progressing from today's large models, trained with vast amounts of data, to nimble energy-efficient domain-specific agents that can reason and think in a world full of uncertainty. To support such agents, hardware will need to be reimagined to allow system-level energy efficiencies $\geq {1000X}$ over the state of the art for targeted domain tasks, subject to accuracy, latency, and coverage constraints. Such a vision of future AI systems is developed in this work.

Recent Machine Learning (ML) approaches have shown increased performance on benchmarks at the cost of escalating compute demands. Hardware, algorithmic and carbon optimizations have been proposed to curb energy use and environmental impacts. We estimate the environmental impacts associated with training models documented in the Epoch AI database over the last decade, with a particular focus on impacts associated with Large Language Models and the hardware used to train them. We find that energy use and environmental impacts associated with training ML models have increased exponentially, even when considering impact reduction strategies such as using less carbon intensive electricity mixes or more efficient hardware. Optimization strategies do not mitigate the impacts induced by model training, suggesting rebound effect. We show that the impacts of hardware must be considered over the entire life cycle rather than the sole use phase in order to avoid impact shifting. Our study demonstrates that increasing efficiency alone does not ensure sustainability. There is an urgent need to systematically integrate environmental impacts in NLP evaluation practices to better inform the community and support the use of impact as a feature in research planning and decision making.