Computer Science Education

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Computer science education investigates how learners develop programming, computational thinking, and other computing skills, and how courses can foster those abilities. Researchers study classroom approaches such as project-based learning and interactive instruction, alongside adaptive practice, learning analytics, and AI tutors grounded in course materials. They evaluate learning through programming tasks, exams, student work, surveys, and measures of engagement, while also examining curriculum coverage and access to computing education. Generative AI has sharpened a central tension: it can offer timely explanations and feedback, but educators must ensure students still build conceptual understanding, critical judgment, and skills that assessments can reliably measure.

Latest papers

54 papers2 papers in the last four weeks, down 50% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Apr 25, 2026

Evaluating Large Language Models on Computer Science University Exams in Data Structures

We present a comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Computer Science (CS) Data Structure examination questions. Our work introduces a new benchmark dataset comprising exam questions from Tel Aviv University (TAU), curated to assess LLMs' abilities in handling closed and multiple-choice questions. We evaluated the performance of OpenAI's GPT 4o and Anthropic's Claude 3.5, popular LLMs, alongside two smaller LLMs, Mathstral 7B and LLaMA 3 8B, across the TAU exams benchmark. Our findings provide insight into the current capabilities of LLMs in CS education.

Edan Gabay, Yael Maoz, Jonathan Stahl +7

Blavatnik School of Computer Science and AI

LLM Evaluation Computer Science Education Multiple-Choice Question Answering Question Answering

Apr 19, 2026

Agentic Education: Using Claude Code to Teach Claude Code

AI coding assistants have proliferated rapidly, yet structured pedagogical frameworks for learning these tools remain scarce. Developers face a gap between tool documentation and practical mastery, relying on fragmented resources such as blog posts, video tutorials, and trial-and-error. We present cc-self-train, a modular interactive curriculum for learning Claude Code, an agentic AI coding tool, through hands-on project construction. The system introduces five contributions: (1) a persona progression model that adapts instructor tone across four stages (Guide, Collaborator, Peer, Launcher), operationalizing Gradual Release of Responsibility for AI-mediated instruction; (2) an adaptive learning system that observes engagement quality through hook-based heuristics and adjusts scaffolding at two timescales, using streak detection for mid-module intervention and aggregate metrics for module-boundary persona changes; (3) a cross-domain unified curriculum in which five distinct project domains share identical feature sequencing, enabling transfer learning; (4) a step-pacing mechanism with explicit pause primitives to manage information overload in an AI-as-instructor context; and (5) an auto-updating curriculum design in which the onboarding agent detects upstream tool changes and updates teaching materials before instruction begins. A parametrized test suite enforces structural consistency as a proxy for pedagogical invariants across all 50 modules. A pilot evaluation with 27 participants shows statistically significant reported self-efficacy gains across all 10 assessed skill areas (p < 0.001), with the largest effects on advanced features such as hooks and custom skills. We discuss implications for the design of auto-updating educational systems.

Zain Naboulsi

Principal AI Engineer, Sparq

Computer Science Education Intelligent Tutoring Systems AI in Education Generative AI in Education Adaptive Learning

Apr 14, 2026

Cross-Course Generalizability of SRL-Aligned Predictive Models Using Digital Learning Traces

STEM dropout rates remain high at universities, particularly in computer science programs with theory-intensive courses. Digital learning environments now capture rich behavioral data that could help identify struggling students early, yet the generalizability of data-driven prediction models across courses and institutions remains uncertain. Guided by self-regulated learning (SRL) theory, this study analyzed multimodal digital-trace data from three undergraduate theoretical computer science courses (N1 = 137, N2 = 104, N3 = 148) at two universities. Weekly SRL-aligned digital-trace indicators were modeled using Elastic Net, Random Forest, and XGBoost to evaluate predictive performance over time and across settings, and model calibration both within and across courses. Early prediction of at-risk students was feasible, with SRL-related behaviors such as time management, effort regulation, and sustained engagement emerging as key predictors. While Random Forest achieved the highest in-sample accuracy, Elastic Net generalized more robustly across contexts. Out-of-sample accuracy and calibration declined between institutions with different base rates, underscoring the contextual nature of predictive analytics in higher education. These findings suggest that digital learning traces enable early identification of at-risk students within courses, but generalizing predictive models beyond their original context requires caution, particularly if the at-risk rates differ between contexts.

Jakob Schwerter, Loreen Sabel, Judith Bose +5

Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen · TU Dortmund University · University of North-Carolina, Chapel Hill +2

Self-Regulated Learning Cross-Domain Generalization Educational Data Mining Computer Science Education

Apr 14, 2026

Evidence of a Cognitive Shift in AI Education: How Students Are Rethinking Human Intelligence?

Perceptions of intelligence shape how learners evaluate and rely on artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Despite rapid advances in AI capabilities, the impact of sustained exposure to these tools on students' valuation of human intelligence (HI) relative to AI remains underexplored. This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of classroom poll responses collected between 2020 and 2026 in AI-focused undergraduate and MSc courses in computer science. Data from 471 students across technical courses (such as Machine Learning and Deep Graph Learning) and design-oriented courses (such as Design Thinking for AI) reveal four recurring phases: hype, distrust, trust, and dependency. While early responses in 2020 slightly favored AI, a consistent shift toward HI emerged from 2024 onward across all MSc cohorts. By 2026, preference for HI reached 65 percent in a technical course (a 12 percentage-point increase from 2025) and 90 percent in a design-oriented course (a 36 percentage-point increase). These findings suggest a gradual reappraisal of human intelligence as AI becomes a routine tool, with implications for learner autonomy and epistemic agency. We conclude by reflecting on this cognitive shift from favoring artificial intelligence toward prioritizing human intelligence.

Islem Rekik

BASIRA Lab, Imperial-X (I-X) and Department of Computing Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

AI in Education Computer Science Education Trust in AI

Apr 13, 2026

SortingHat: Redefining Operating Systems Education with a Tailored Digital Teaching Assistant

Operating Systems (OS) courses are among the most challenging in computer science education due to the complexity of internal structures and the diversity of running environments. Traditional teaching methods often fail to address the diverse backgrounds, learning speeds, and practical needs of students. To tackle these challenges, we present SortingHat, a personalized digital teaching assistant tailored specifically for OS education. SortingHat integrates advanced AI technologies, including a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework and multi agent reinforcement learning (MARL), to deliver adaptive, scalable, and effective educational support. SortingHat features a 3D digital human interface powered by large language models (LLMs) to provide personalized, empathetic, and context aware guidance. It generates tailored exercises based on each student's learning history and academic performance, reinforcing weak areas and challenging advanced concepts. Additionally, the system incorporates a robust evaluation pipeline that ensures fair, consistent, and unbiased grading of student submissions while delivering personalized, actionable feedback for improvement. By combining personalized guidance, adaptive content creation, and automated assessment, SortingHat transforms OS education into an engaging, immersive, and scalable experience.

Yifan Zhang, Xinkui Zhao, Zuxin Wang +4

School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

Computer Science Education Intelligent Tutoring Systems Generative AI in Education

Apr 13, 2026

Use of AI Tools: Guidelines to Maintain Academic Integrity in Computing Colleges

The rapid adoption of AI tools such as ChatGPT has significantly transformed academic practices, offering considerable benefits for both students and faculty in computing disciplines. These tools have been shown to enhance learning efficiency, academic self-efficacy, and confidence. However, their increasing use also raises pressing concerns regarding the preservation of academic integrity -- an essential pillar of the educational process. This paper explores the implications of widespread AI tool usage within computing colleges, with a particular focus on how to align their use with the principles of academic honesty. We begin by classifying common assessment techniques employed in computing education and examine how each may be impacted by AI-assisted tools. Building on this foundation, we propose a set of general guidelines applicable across various assessment formats to help instructors responsibly integrate AI tools into their pedagogy. Furthermore, we provide targeted, assessment-specific recommendations designed to uphold educational objectives while mitigating risks of academic misconduct. These guidelines serve as a practical framework for instructors aiming to balance the pedagogical advantages of AI tools with the imperative of maintaining academic integrity in computing education. Finally, we introduce a formal model that provides a structured mathematical framework for evaluating student assessments in the presence of AI-assisted tools.

Hatem M. El-boghdadi, Toqeer Ali Syed, Ali Akarma +1

Faculty of computer and information System, Islamic University of Madina, Saudi Arabia · Faculty of Artificial Intelligence Multimedia University, Malaysia

Academic Integrity Generative AI in Education Computer Science Education Educational Assessment

Apr 12, 2026

Perceived Importance of Cognitive Skills Among Computing Students in the Era of AI

The availability and increasing integration of generative AI tools have transformed computing education. While AI in education presents opportunities, it also raises new concerns about how these powerful know-it-all AI tools, which are becoming widespread, impact cognitive skill development among students. Cognitive skills are essential for academic success and professional competence. It relates to the ability to understand, analyze, evaluate, synthesize information and more. The extensive use of these AI tools can aid in cognitive offloading, freeing up cognitive resources to be used in other tasks and activities. However, cognitive offloading may inadvertently lead to diminishing cognitive involvement in learning and related activities when using AI tools. Understanding cognitive skills' impact in the era of AI is essential to align curricular design with evolving workforce demands and changing work environment and processes. To address this concern and to develop an understanding of how the importance of cognitive skills changes with increasing integration of AI, we conducted a researcher-monitored and regulated quantitative survey of undergraduate computing students. We examined students' perceptions of cognitive skills across three temporal frames: prior to widespread AI adoption (past), current informal and formal use of AI in learning contexts (present), and future with even more AI integration in professional environments (future). In the study, students rated the importance of 11 cognitive skills. Our analysis reveals that students expect all 11 cognitive skills to be of diminishing importance in the future, when AI use and integration increases. Our findings highlight the need for educational interventions that explicitly reinforce cognitive skill development within learning environments that are now often relying on AI.

Neha Rani, Erta Cenko, Laura Melissa Cruz Castro

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Computer Science Education Generative AI in Education

Apr 7, 2026

"Don't Be Afraid, Just Learn": Insights from Industry Practitioners to Prepare Software Engineers in the Age of Generative AI

Although tension between university curricula and industry expectations has existed in some form for decades, the rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI) tools into software development has recently widened the gap between the two domains. To better understand this disconnect, we surveyed 51 industry practitioners (software developers, technical leads, upper management, \etc) and conducted 11 follow-up interviews focused on hiring practices, required job skills, perceived shortcomings in university curricula, and views on how university learning outcomes can be improved. Our results suggest that GenAI creates demand for new skills (\eg prompting and output evaluation), while strengthening the importance of soft-skills (\eg problem solving and critical thinking) and traditional competencies (\eg architecture design and debugging). We synthesize these findings into actionable recommendations for academia (\eg how to incorporate GenAI into curricula and evaluation redesign). Our work offers empirical guidance to help educators prepare students for modern software engineering environments.

Daniel Otten, Trevor Stalnaker, Nathan Wintersgill +3

William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA

Computer Science Education Generative AI in Education

Apr 1, 2026

Trust and Reliance on AI in Education: AI Literacy and Need for Cognition as Moderators

As generative AI systems are integrated into educational settings, students often encounter AI-generated output while working through learning tasks, either by requesting help or through integrated tools. Trust in AI can influence how students interpret and use that output, including whether they evaluate it critically or exhibit overreliance. We investigate how students' trust relates to their appropriate reliance on an AI assistant during programming problem-solving tasks, and whether this relationship differs by learner characteristics. With 432 undergraduate participants, students' completed Python output-prediction problems while receiving recommendations and explanations from an AI chatbot, including accurate and intentionally misleading suggestions. We operationalize reliance behaviorally as the extent to which students' responses reflected appropriate use of the AI assistant's suggestions, accepting them when they were correct and rejecting them when they were incorrect. Pre- and post-task surveys assessed trust in the assistant, AI literacy, need for cognition, programming self-efficacy, and programming literacy. Results showed a non-linear relationship in which higher trust was associated with lower appropriate reliance, suggesting weaker discrimination between correct and incorrect recommendations. This relationship was significantly moderated by students' AI literacy and need for cognition. These findings highlight the need for future work on instructional and system supports that encourage more reflective evaluation of AI assistance during problem-solving.

Griffin Pitts, Neha Rani, Weedguet Mildort

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA · University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Trust in AI Generative AI in Education Computer Science Education AI Literacy

Mar 31, 2026

Human-in-the-Loop Control of Objective Drift in LLM-Assisted Computer Science Education

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in computer science education through AI-assisted programming tools, yet such workflows often exhibit objective drift, in which locally plausible outputs diverge from stated task specifications. Existing instructional responses frequently emphasize tool-specific prompting practices, limiting durability as AI platforms evolve. This paper adopts a human-centered stance, treating human-in-the-loop (HITL) control as a stable educational problem rather than a transitional step toward AI autonomy. Drawing on systems engineering and control-theoretic concepts, we frame objectives and world models as operational artifacts that students configure to stabilize AI-assisted work. We propose a pilot undergraduate CS laboratory curriculum that explicitly separates planning from execution and trains students to specify acceptance criteria and architectural constraints prior to code generation. In selected labs, the curriculum also introduces deliberate, concept-aligned drift to support diagnosis and recovery from specification violations. We report a sensitivity power analysis for a three-arm pilot design comparing unstructured AI use, structured planning, and structured planning with injected drift, establishing detectable effect sizes under realistic section-level constraints. The contribution is a theory-driven, methodologically explicit foundation for HITL pedagogy that renders control competencies teachable across evolving AI tools.

Mark Dranias, Adam Whitley

Asheville Institute for Memory and Longevity. Mills River, NC USA · University of North Carolina Asheville, Asheville, NC USA

Generative AI in Education Human-in-the-Loop AI Computer Science Education AI Alignment

Mar 31, 2026

From Domain Understanding to Design Readiness: a playbook for GenAI-supported learning in Software Engineering

Software engineering courses often require rapid upskilling in supporting knowledge areas such as domain understanding and modeling methods. We report an experience from a two-week milestone in a master's course where 29 students used a customized ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) tutor grounded in a curated course knowledge base to learn cryptocurrency-finance basics and Domain-Driven Design (DDD). We logged all interactions and evaluated a 34.5% random sample of prompt-answer pairs (60/~174) with a five-dimension rubric (accuracy, relevance, pedagogical value, cognitive load, supportiveness), and we collected pre/post self-efficacy. Responses were consistently accurate and relevant in this setting: accuracy averaged 98.9% with no factual errors and only 2/60 minor inaccuracies, and relevance averaged 92.2%. Pedagogical value was high (89.4%) with generally appropriate cognitive load (82.78%), but supportiveness was low (37.78%). Students reported large pre-post self-efficacy gains for genAI-assisted domain learning and DDD application. From these observations we distill seventeen concrete teaching practices spanning prompt/configuration and course/workflow design (e.g., setting expected granularity, constraining verbosity, curating guardrail examples, adding small credit with a simple quality rubric). Within this single-course context, results suggest that genAI-supported learning can complement instruction in domain understanding and modeling tasks, while leaving room to improve tone and follow-up structure.

Rafal Wlodarski

Electrical & Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University Silicon Valley, Mountain View, CA, USA

AI in Education Generative AI in Education Computer Science Education Intelligent Tutoring Systems Generative AI Evaluation

Mar 31, 2026

Rethinking AI Literacy Education in Higher Education: Bridging Risk Perception and Responsible Adoption

As AI becomes increasingly embedded across societal domains, understanding how future AI practitioners, particularly technology students, perceive its risks is essential for responsible development and adoption. This study analyzed responses from 139 students in Computer Science, Data Science/Data Analytics, and other disciplines using both explicit AI risk ratings and scenario-based assessments of risk and adoption willingness. Four key findings emerged: (1) Students expressed substantially higher concern for concrete, explicitly stated risks than for abstract or scenario-embedded risks; (2) Perceived risk and willingness to adopt AI demonstrated a clear inverse relationship; (3) Although technical education narrowed gender differences in risk awareness, male students reported higher adoption willingness; and (4) A form of "risk underappreciation" was observed, wherein students in AI-related specializations showed both elevated explicit risk awareness and higher willingness to adopt AI, despite lower recognition of risks in applied scenarios. These findings underscore the need for differentiated AI literacy strategies that bridge the gap between awareness and responsible adoption and offer valuable insights for educators, policymakers, industry leaders, and academic institutions aiming to cultivate ethically informed and socially responsible AI practitioners.

Shasha Yu, Fiona Carroll, Barry L. Bentley

School of Professional Studies, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, 01610, MA, USA · Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus, Western Avenue, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, Wales, UK · Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA

AI Literacy Responsible AI Computer Science Education

Mar 30, 2026

Mapping data literacy trajectories in K-12 education

Data literacy skills are fundamental in computer science education. However, understanding how data-driven systems work represents a paradigm shift from traditional rule-based programming. We conducted a systematic literature review of 84 studies to understand K-12 learners' engagement with data across disciplines and contexts. We propose the data paradigms framework that categorises learning activities along two dimensions: (i) logic (knowledge-based or data-driven systems), and (ii) explainability (transparent or opaque models). We further apply the notion of learning trajectories to visualize the pathways learners follow across these distinct paradigms. We detail four distinct trajectories as a provocation for researchers and educators to reflect on how the notion of data literacy varies depending on the learning context. We suggest these trajectories could be useful to those concerned with the design of data literacy learning environments within and beyond CS education.

Robert Whyte, Manni Cheung, Katharine Childs +2

Raspberry Pi Foundation, United Kingdom · University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Computer Science Education AI in Education

Mar 30, 2026

Evaluating LLMs for Answering Student Questions in Introductory Programming Courses

The rapid emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents both opportunities and challenges for programming education. While students increasingly use generative AI tools, direct access often hinders the learning process by providing complete solutions rather than pedagogical hints. Concurrently, educators face significant workload and scalability challenges when providing timely, personalized feedback. This study investigates the capabilities of LLMs to safely and effectively assist educators in answering student questions within a CS1 programming course. To achieve this, we established a rigorous, reproducible evaluation process by curating a benchmark dataset of 170 authentic student questions from a learning management system, paired with ground-truth responses authored by subject matter experts. Because traditional text-matching metrics are insufficient for evaluating open-ended educational responses, we developed and validated a custom LLM-as-a-Judge metric optimized for assessing pedagogical accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that models, such as Gemini 3 flash, can surpass the quality baseline of typical educator responses, achieving high alignment with expert pedagogical standards. To mitigate persistent risks like hallucination and ensure alignment with course-specific context, we advocate for a "teacher-in-the-loop" implementation. Finally, we abstract our methodology into a task-agnostic evaluation framework, advocating for a shift in the development of educational LLM tools from ad-hoc, post-deployment testing to a quantifiable, pre-deployment validation process.

Thomas Van Mullem, Bart Mesuere, Peter Dawyndt

AI in Education Generative AI in Education Computer Science Education LLM Evaluation LLM-as-a-Judge

Mar 29, 2026

Exploring Student Perception on Gen AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Descriptive Study

The rapid proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping pedagogical practices and assessment models in higher education. While institutional and educator perspectives on GenAI integration are increasingly documented, the student perspective remains comparatively underexplored. This study examines how students perceive, use, and evaluate GenAI within their academic practices, focusing on usage patterns, perceived benefits, and expectations for institutional support. Data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 436 postgraduate Computer Science students at the University of Hertfordshire and analysed using descriptive methods. The findings reveal a Confidence-Competence Paradox: although more than 60% of students report high familiarity with tools such as ChatGPT, daily academic use remains limited and confidence in effective application is only moderate. Students primarily employ GenAI for cognitive scaffolding tasks, including concept clarification and brainstorming, rather than fully automated content generation. At the same time, respondents express concerns regarding data privacy, reliability of AI-generated information, and the potential erosion of critical thinking skills. The results also indicate strong student support for integrating AI literacy into curricula and programme Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours (KSBs). Overall, the study suggests that universities should move beyond a policing approach to GenAI and adopt a pedagogical framework that emphasises AI literacy, ethical guidance, and equitable access to AI tools.

Harpreet Singh, Jaspreet Singh, Satwant Singh +4

Generative AI in Education AI Literacy Computer Science Education

Mar 19, 2026

Student views in AI Ethics and Social Impact

An investigation, from a gender perspective, of how students view the ethical implications and societal effects of artificial intelligence is conducted, examining concepts that could have a big influence on how artificial intelligence may be taught in the future. For this, we conducted a survey on a cohort of 230 second year computer science students to reveal their opinions. The results revealed that AI, from the students' perspective, will significantly impact daily life, particularly in areas such as medicine, education, or media. Men are more aware of potential changes in Computer Science, autonomous driving, image and video processing, and chatbot usage, while women mention more the impact on social media. Both men and women perceive potential threats in the same manner, with men more aware of war, AI controlled drones, terrain recognition, and information war. Women seem to have a stronger tendency towards ethical considerations and helping others.

Tudor-Dan Mihoc, Manuela-Andreea Petrescu, Emilia-Loredana Pop

Department of Computer Science, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Responsible AI Computer Science Education

Mar 18, 2026

GUIDE: GenAI Units In Digital Design Education

GenAI Units In Digital Design Education (GUIDE) is an open courseware repository with runnable Google Colab labs and other materials. We describe the repository's architecture and educational approach based on standardized teaching units comprising slides, short videos, runnable labs, and related papers. This organization enables consistency for both the students' learning experience and the reuse and grading by instructors. We demonstrate GUIDE in practice with three representative units: VeriThoughts for reasoning and formal-verification-backed RTL generation, enhanced LLM-aided testbench generation, and LLMPirate for IP Piracy. We also provide details for four example course instances (GUIDE4ChipDesign, Build your ASIC, GUIDE4HardwareSecurity, and Hardware Design) that assemble GUIDE units into full semester offerings, learning outcomes, and capstone projects, all based on proven materials. For example, the GUIDE4HardwareSecurity course includes a project on LLM-aided hardware Trojan insertion that has been successfully deployed in the classroom and in Cybersecurity Games and Conference (CSAW), a student competition and academic conference for cybersecurity. We also organized an NYU Cognichip Hackathon, engaging students across 24 international teams in AI-assisted RTL design workflows. The GUIDE repository is open for contributions and available at: https://github.com/FCHXWH823/LLM4ChipDesign.

Weihua Xiao, Jason Blocklove, Matthew DeLorenzo +6

∗NYU Tandon, USA · §Texas A&M, USA · †NYU Abu Dhabi, UAE +1

Computer Science Education Generative AI in Education Electronic Design Automation

Mar 15, 2026

Bots and Blocks: Presenting a project-based approach for robotics education

To prepare students for upcoming trends and challenges, it is important to teach them about the helpful and important aspects of modern technologies, such as robotics. However, classic study programs often fail to prepare students for working in the industry because of the lack of practical experience, caused by solely theoretical lecturing. The challenge is to teach both practical and theoretical skills interactively to improve the students' learning. In the scope of the paper, a project-based learning approach is proposed, where students are taught in an agile, semester-spanning project how to work with robots. This project is part of the applied computer science degree study program Digital Technologies. The paper presents the framework as well as an exemplary project featuring the development of a disassembly software ecosystem for hardware robots. In the project, the students are taught the programming of robots with the help of the Robot Operating System (ROS). To ensure the base qualifications, the students are taught in so-called schools, an interactive mix of lectures and exercises. At the beginning of the course, the basics of the technologies are covered, while the students work more and more in their team with the robot on a specific use case. The use case here is to automate the disassembly of build block assemblies.

Tobias Geger, Dominique Briechle, Andreas Rausch

Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany

Robotics Education Computer Science Education Educational Technology Robotics

Mar 12, 2026

EducaSim: Interactive Simulacra for CS1 Instructional Practice

Role play is a high-impact mode of training that has demonstrated its effectiveness in improving learning outcomes. However, it is difficult to scale to teacher instruction due to its inherent dependency on providing personnel who are both trained and available to facilitate this learning environment. This poses a challenge, especially to massive online courses which may employ and aid hundreds to thousands of novice teachers. In this work, we present EducaSim: a novel framework that uses generative agents to simulate a small-group section for teachers-in-training to practice instruction. EducaSim works by implementing diverse pedagogical-based personas, actual course material, and agent-based architectures constructed for instructional practice to provide a pedagogically rich environment for teachers-in-training to engage in role play learning -- without the costly overhead that comes with it. We share our experiences with constructing and making the tool available for experimental training and preparation in a six-week CS1 course supporting 20,000 students. We found that teachers who engaged generally saw it as a positive experience. We believe that EducaSim is an important step to providing experiential teaching practice at scale for closely-defined settings and has great potential for future applications.

Cameron Mohne, Nicholas Vo, Dora Demszky +1

Stanford University, California, USA

AI in Education Computer Science Education Large Language Model-Based Role-Play Simulation Generative AI in Education User Simulation

Mar 10, 2026

A Comparative Study on the Impact of Traditional Learning and Interactive Learning on Students' Academic Performance and Emotional Well-Being

The growing adoption of interactive learning tools in higher education offers new opportunities to enhance student performance and well-being. This study compares the effects of traditional and interactive learning methods on academic performance, engagement, motivation, and emotional well-being among 100 university students enrolled in a computer intrusion detection course. Participants were randomly assigned to either a traditional learning group (lectures and notes) or an interactive learning group utilising tools such as Kahoot, Panopto, Slido, Quizizz, Padlet, and educational videos. Academic achievement was measured through pre-tests, post-tests, final exams, and assignments, while engagement and emotional states were assessed using validated Likert-scale questionnaires. Results showed that students in the interactive group significantly outperformed their peers in both post-tests (67.48% vs. 53.36%) and final exams (80.8% vs. 61.44%). Interactive learners also demonstrated greater behavioural (+67.01%) and emotional engagement (+75.32%), along with enhanced emotional well-being marked by increased positive emotions (+66.67%) and reduced frustration. A significant drop in cognitive involvement (-39.8%) indicates possible cognitive overload. The pedagogical potential of interactive learning is reaffirmed by this result while reinforcing the need for balancing stimulation and cognitive level. Future research with larger, diverse samples is suggested for generalising and maximising outcomes.

Siva Raja Sindiramutty

Taylor’s University, School of Computer Science, Subang Jaya, Malaysia

Educational Technology Computer Science Education

Feb 27, 2026

Empowering Future Cybersecurity Leaders: Advancing Students through FINDS Education for Digital Forensic Excellence

The Forensics Investigations Network in Digital Sciences (FINDS) Research Center of Excellence (CoE), funded by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory, advances Digital Forensic Engineering Education (DFEE) through an integrated research education framework for AI enabled cybersecurity workforce development. FINDS combines high performance computing (HPC), secure software engineering, adversarial analytics, and experiential learning to address emerging cyber and synthetic media threats. This paper introduces the Multidependency Capacity Building Skills Graph (MCBSG), a directed acyclic graph based model that encodes hierarchical and cross domain dependencies among competencies in AI-driven forensic programming, statistical inference, digital evidence processing, and threat detection. The MCBSG enables structured modeling of skill acquisition pathways and quantitative capacity assessment. Supervised machine learning methods, including entropy-based Decision Tree Classifiers and regression modeling, are applied to longitudinal multi cohort datasets capturing mentoring interactions, laboratory performance metrics, curriculum artifacts, and workshop participation. Feature importance analysis and cross validation identify key predictors of technical proficiency and research readiness. Three year statistical evaluation demonstrates significant gains in forensic programming accuracy, adversarial reasoning, and HPC-enabled investigative workflows. Results validate the MCBSG as a scalable, interpretable framework for data-driven, inclusive cybersecurity education aligned with national defense workforce priorities.

Yashas Hariprasad, Subhash Gurappa, Sundararaj S. Iyengar +3

California State University, East Bay, CA, USA · Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA · Florida Agriculture and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA +2

Computer Science Education Digital Forensics

Feb 23, 2026

CodeGENCAT: Generative Computerized Adaptive Testing for Open-ended Coding Problems

Existing Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) frameworks typically select questions based on the predicted likelihood that the student will answer correctly. This design ignores information contained in students' open-ended responses, especially in domains such as programming education, where code structures and bugs contain rich information on student knowledge. In this work, we propose Code GENerative CAT (CodeGENCAT), a generative CAT framework that selects questions using predicted student code responses. First, we develop a Generative Item Response Theory (GIRT) model that generates code responses conditioned on estimated student knowledge, trained with supervised fine-tuning followed by direct preference optimization for knowledge-response alignment. Second, we introduce three question-selection algorithms that measure uncertainty, coding style diversity, and information from predicted student code responses. Experiments on two real-world programming education datasets show that CodeGENCAT outperforms all CAT baselines, achieving an AUC improvement of up to 4.32% over the strongest baseline in the early stages of adaptive testing.

Wanyong Feng, Alexander Scarlatos, Ruochen Sun +1

University of Massachusetts Amherst · Independent Researcher

Computerized Adaptive Testing Educational Assessment Item Response Theory Computer Science Education Code Generation

Feb 17, 2026

Transforming GenAI Policy to Prompting Instruction: An RCT of Scalable Prompting Interventions in a CS1 Course

Despite universal GenAI adoption, students cannot distinguish task performance from actual learning and lack skills to leverage AI for learning, leading to worse exam performance when AI use remains unreflective. Yet few interventions teaching students to prompt AI as a tutor rather than solution provider have been validated at scale through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To bridge this gap, we conducted a semester-long RCT (N=979) with four ICAP framework-based instructional conditions varying in engagement intensity with a pre-test, immediate and delayed post-test and surveys. Mixed methods analysis results showed: (1) All conditions significantly improved prompting skills, with gains increasing progressively from Condition 1 to Condition 4, validating ICAP's cognitive engagement hierarchy; (2) for students with similar pre-test scores, higher learning gain in immediate post-test predict higher final exam score, though no direct between-group differences emerged; (3) Our interventions are suitable and scalable solutions for diverse educational contexts, resources and learners. Together, this study makes empirical and theoretical contributions: (1) theoretically, we provided one of the first large-scale RCTs examining how cognitive engagement shapes learning in prompting literacy and clarifying the relationship between learning-oriented prompting skills and broader academic performance; (2) empirically, we offered timely design guidance for transforming GenAI classroom policies into scalable, actionable prompting literacy instruction to advance learning in the era of Generative AI.

Ruiwei Xiao, Runlong Ye, Xinying Hou +4

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States · University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada · University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States +1

Generative AI in Education AI Literacy LLM Prompting Computer Science Education

Dec 1, 2025

A Comparative Study of Student Perspectives on Technical Writing Feedback Quality: Evaluating LLMs, SLMs, and Humans in Computer Science Topics

To address the scalability of feedback in computer science while mitigating the privacy and cost limitations of commercial Large Language Models (LLMs), this study evaluates a locally hosted Small Language Model (SLM). We deployed a quantized Llama-3.1, GPT-4, and human instructors across introductory programming (N=176), operating systems (N=80), and a writing seminar (N=7). Mixed-methods analysis of student perceptions reveals that while the local SLM matched commercial LLMs and was rated higher by students for readability and actionability in technical courses, human feedback remained more favoured for highly specialized writing tasks. We demonstrate that local SLMs offer a privacy-preserving, zero-marginal-cost alternative for foundational feedback, supporting a tiered pedagogical framework where AI handles structural guidance while instructors focus on high-level conceptual scaffolding.

Suqing Liu, Runlong Ye, Christopher Eaton +2

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada · Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada · Research Institute for the Study of University Pedagogy, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada +1

LLM Evaluation Computer Science Education Small Language Models