Intersectional Fairness
Overview
Intersectional fairness examines how model outcomes and errors differ for people at the overlap of attributes such as race, gender, age, or health status, where single-attribute averages can hide harms. Common approaches include subgroup audits with metrics such as demographic parity and equalized odds, fairness-constrained optimization, representation learning, and preprocessing or postprocessing interventions. These methods are evaluated in settings including healthcare prediction, face and speech analysis, language models, recommendation, and clustering, with attention to both predictive utility and subgroup outcomes. A central challenge is that fine-grained groups may have sparse data, while fairness metrics and mitigation effects can conflict or vary across contexts, so interventions need careful, repeated evaluation.
Latest papers
26 papers3 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.