Learning with Noisy Labels

Machine learning models often suffer performance degradation under subpopulation shift, particularly when spurious correlations cause models to rely on shortcut features that fail to generalize across subgroups. A recent line of work mitigates this issue by using loss-based signals to identify informative samples, but these signals can become severely distorted under label noise: mislabeled samples may also incur large losses and contaminate subsequent reweighting or retraining. Despite its practical importance, this intersection remains largely underexplored. We propose POTER, a reweighting framework based on optimal transport that derives sample importance from the transport geometry between the training distribution and a reference distribution constructed from limited validation group annotations. By measuring alignment at the individual-sample level rather than relying on loss, POTER downweights mislabeled or strongly bias-aligned samples while assigning higher importance to samples better aligned with the reference distribution. In addition, POTER requires only a single ERM training stage, moving beyond the retraining paradigm common in recent work. Across standard benchmarks and noisy-label settings, POTER achieves state-of-the-art worst-group accuracy, including cases where label corruption is concentrated within minority subgroups.

Operational estimation of wheat-cultivated area is persistently constrained by discordance between administrative record-keeping and remotely sensed classification products. We address this administrative reference discordance for the 2022 Rabi season in Patiala district, Punjab, India, using a thirteen-timestep Sentinel-2 NDVI time series. A curated 849-sample reference dataset, developed through an iterative rule-based bootstrapping procedure, underpins both a feature sensitivity analysis and an operational classifier. Feature sensitivity independently assessed via Cohen's d and gradient-boosted information gain converges on the February-to-March grain-fill window as most discriminative. Four classifiers (1D-CNN, LSTM, hybrid CNN-LSTM, and XGBoost) were benchmarked on an identical 679/170 sample split. XGBoost achieved the highest overall accuracy (78.82%) against deep-learning baselines (64-66%), consistent with tree-based ensembles' favourable parameter-to-sample ratio in low-sample regimes. At full-population deployment across 36.25 million valid district pixels, the operational classifier attained 86.31% precision and 71.05% recall. The predicted wheat extent deviated by only +2.99% from the official tabular target, whereas the government's spatial reference mask exhibited a +25.11% positive area bias against the identical target. This asymmetry indicates that a classifier trained on an auditor-curated reference set reconciles more closely with the official tabular area than the spatial product conventionally used to validate it. We present this dual-track curation-and-classification framework as a methodological reference for crop-area reconciliation in label-noisy administrative settings.

In an important recent work, Blanc (2026) gave an algorithm for robustly learning Boolean concept classes with respect to a fixed distribution that outputs a (randomized) classifier achieving the optimal error of $η+ \varepsilon$ where $η$ is the noise rate. In contrast, it is well known that deterministic hypotheses cannot achieve error less than $2η+ \varepsilon.$ Blanc's algorithm is computationally inefficient, and the main problem left open in his work is to find a polynomial-time algorithm given access to an oracle for empirical risk minimization (ERM). In this paper, we resolve this problem and give such an algorithm. Perhaps surprisingly, our techniques make crucial use of various types of no-regret learners. Additionally, we give an efficient algorithm (no ERM oracle required) for robustly learning any function class that admits sandwiching polynomials with respect to hypercontractive distributions. As one consequence, we give the first polynomial-time algorithm for robustly learning a halfspace with respect to Gaussian marginals that achieves error $η+ \varepsilon$ for any constant $\varepsilon$.

Class-balanced learning and label noise create a coupled failure mode: frequency correction prevents majority classes from dominating the decision rule, but can amplify incorrectly labeled minority examples. We introduce BARGE (Bounded Adjustment with Reliability-Guided Embeddings), a single-stage objective combining a bounded, prior-adjusted density-power score with reliability-guided angular geometry. Its classification score is strictly proper in the adjusted probability space and recovers balanced Bayes ordering under clean supervision and the true class prior. Under label contamination, its finite range bounds classification-risk perturbation at a fixed predictor, while its logit gradient redescends when the model confidently contradicts the supplied label. The adjusted target probability also weights class-equal feature compactness, and a one-sided separation term discourages aligned class directions. BARGE requires neither a noise rate nor a transition matrix, uses one network, and leaves inference unchanged. We evaluate it on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under long-tail and step imbalance, clean labels, and 20% and 40% random incorrect-label replacement. Across 12 clean settings, BARGE ranks second overall and attains the lowest error in four. Under corruption, it achieves the lowest mean balanced error in all six dataset-corruption settings, reducing the six-setting average from 72.32% for the strongest competitor to 70.00%. It also obtains the highest macro-F1 and macro-AUPRC in every corrupted-label setting. Ablations show that class-equal angular compactness improves on the bounded score alone. These results support bounded predictive influence and reliability-guided geometry as complementary mechanisms for imbalanced learning with uncertain labels.

Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) is a destructive pathogen of sweet corn and other cereal crops, causing yield losses and complicating early detection because symptoms are spatially variable and subtle. In sweet corn seed production, WSMV also has regulatory importance, as phytosanitary regulations from countries such as New Zealand and Chile require seed lots to be certified virus-free. Visual scouting is unreliable because symptoms can resemble abiotic stress, while enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is accurate but expensive, labor-intensive, and difficult to scale. We present an automated pipeline for plant-level WSMV detection using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) multispectral imagery. The framework integrates orthomosaic reconstruction, geospatial alignment, plant extraction, and classification using a Vision Transformer with seven-channel inputs (five spectral bands, NDVI, and NDRE). Using treatment-based labels, the model achieved 89% accuracy on over 6,500 test patches across multiple growth stages. However, ELISA-based ground truth revealed substantial label noise: only a small fraction of sampled plants in inoculated plots were infected. Treatment labels therefore did not reliably represent infection status, and the high accuracy was largely driven by label bias rather than disease detection. Performance decreased markedly against row-level symptom severity and plant-level ELISA labels. Under these higher-fidelity but smaller-sample conditions, both deep learning and classical machine learning showed limited generalization and weak separability between ELISA-confirmed mock-inoculated and infected plants. These results show that UAS-based disease detection is constrained by label fidelity and data availability, emphasizing biologically grounded labels and models aligned with real-world conditions.

Vision-based crack inspection depends on segmentation networks whose reliability depends on the quantity, diversity and label quality of their training data. Pixel-level annotations are costly, and crack images of specific structures are scarce. Generative augmentation can supply additional data, but existing methods address isolated steps. They reuse annotated masks, offer limited control over crack geometry, and adopt the conditioning mask as the label without checking it. This paper presents an end-to-end pipeline that produces labelled crack data without manual annotation and assesses the reliability of these data and of the detectors trained on them. Procedurally sampled Bézier skeletons with guaranteed geometric properties are converted into crack masks by a generative adversarial network (GAN). A dual-ControlNet Stable Diffusion model renders the masks as crack images, either on text-described surfaces or on user-provided backgrounds. An ensemble of segmentation networks trained on real images combines its agreement with the inherited label and its internal disagreement into a pixel-wise label confidence. This confidence weights the training loss instead of removing samples with a threshold. The trained detectors are evaluated with image-space probability of detection (POD) and calibration analyses. On CRACK500 and CrackTree200, the pipeline improves five segmentation networks over conventional, diffusion-based and flow-matching-based augmentation, and on CRACK500 confidence weighting yields a higher accuracy than threshold filtering at every tested threshold. On CRACK500, the crack width that U-Net detects with 90% probability at 95% confidence decreases from 8.0 to 4.3 pixels, and the expected calibration error decreases from 14.2% to 9.6%.

Noisy annotations pose a significant challenge for supervised deep learning, as neural networks rely on large-scale, high-quality labeled data whose corruption can severely impair model performance. Although robustness to label noise has been extensively studied for classification tasks, it remains relatively underexplored in Pose Estimation (PE). This limitation becomes critical in clinical contexts, including neonatology, where PE of preterm infants is used to support the assessment of spontaneous motility, a key indicator of neurodevelopmental trajectories. In such settings, infants' images labeling is further hindered by visual challenges (e.g., keypoint self-occlusions, caregiver interference), making the annotation process inherently susceptible to errors. To tackle noisy annotations in PE, we introduce REliable keypoint selection via Memory of traINing Dynamics (REMIND), a clustering-based keypoint-selection strategy that exploits keypoint-wise training dynamics to identify noisy labels without assuming any prior knowledge of the noise distribution, thus enabling noise-free model training. When evaluated on the proprietary NeoPose dataset, comprising 46 videos of 46 preterm infants recorded in real clinical settings, REMIND correctly identifies noisy annotations across multiple corruption scenarios, achieving up to 93% Area Under the Curve (AUC) with three different PE architectures used in the relevant literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly address label noise in preterm infants' PE, paving the way for the design of trustworthy learning-based algorithms for infants'monitoring support when data quality cannot be guaranteed.

Neural map matchers estimate an image's 3-DoF pose relative to a 2D map. These models are trained on large-scale datasets of geo-referenced images, whose position and heading labels often contain noise that affects the trained models. To address this, we present AutoCompass, a supervision approach for training neural map matchers from inaccurate absolute pose labels. First, we show that heading labels are unnecessary: trained from raw GPS labels, models learn to predict accurate headings, automatically. Second, defining a tolerance region around raw GPS improves positional accuracy. Third, if available, our supervision uses relative poses between training images, obtained via SLAM or SfM, which provide a more accurate training signal. Across driving and egocentric benchmarks, AutoCompass consistently outperforms counterparts trained with the usual strong reliance on absolute pose labels.

Supervised deep learning methods enable the rapid processing of ecological image data, but depend on a costly annotation process. Consequently, training labels are commonly derived from volunteer citizen science projects. However, disagreement among volunteers introduces uncertainty in the "ground truth" data that are assumed to be correct for model training and validation. Using two datasets containing camera trap images with associated volunteer and expert classifications, we investigated the effects of training under higher ground truth uncertainty. We observed improved overall test accuracy, particularly for images that were more difficult for volunteers. Species-level accuracy also generally improved, but generalisation to a different dataset did not. The benefits of ground truth uncertainty were enhanced by pre-training on ImageNet. Pre-training also reduced the number of training epochs required; further reductions in computational cost, but not gains in accuracy, resulted from additional pre-training on other camera trap images. With unbalanced training data, we still observed a clear benefit of increased ground truth uncertainty for overall accuracy, especially on difficult images. Class imbalance improved accuracy for common species, reduced rare species accuracy, and changed patterns of misclassification to more closely resemble mistakes made by volunteers. Our findings have implications for applying deep learning across ecological image types with multiple labels. Practitioners can improve accuracy, especially on difficult examples, by including moderate levels of label disagreement during training and using models pre-trained on general image data. In addition to improving the use of citizen science-derived labels in model training, our study suggests avenues for more effectively integrating human and deep learning classifications in combined workflows. (abridged)

Noisy labels remain a critical challenge for training deep neural networks, since memorizing incorrect labels degrades generalization. Once noisy samples are identified after training, the standard solution is to retrain the model from scratch on the cleaned dataset, which is increasingly expensive as datasets and models grow. Machine Unlearning (MU) has recently emerged as a computationally efficient alternative, but the relative effectiveness of different MU strategies for noisy-label correction remains poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a comparative empirical study of five MU methods (NegGrad, Fine-Tuning (FT), Random Labeling (RL), SalUn, and MUNBa) across symmetric, asymmetric, instance-dependent, and open-set noise on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and the real-world noisy dataset Food-101N. Our central finding is that the appropriate unlearning strategy is conditioned on the noise structure. Simple FT is a strong baseline across most closed-set scenarios; RL and SalUn are the most consistently robust methods and, under instance-dependent noise, approach retraining accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost; MUNBa shows advantages mainly under extreme symmetric noise. Under open-set noise, in contrast, we show that retraining on the cleaned subset degrades accuracy relative to the noisy baseline, so approximating the retrained model is not an adequate objective in this regime. On Food-101N, all MU methods remain competitive and achieve accuracies close to retraining despite reducing runtime by an order of magnitude. These findings provide practical guidelines for selecting MU strategies for post-training noisy-label correction.

Broad Learning System (BLS) offers an efficient alternative to deep architectures by enabling fast learning through randomized feature mapping and closed-form solutions. However, its reliance on squared error loss makes it highly sensitive to noise, outliers, and corrupted labels, limiting its reliability in real-world scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose Wave-BLS, a robust broad learning framework that integrates the wave loss function, which is asymmetric, bounded, and smooth, enabling controlled penalization of large errors. The proposed formulation replaces the standard least-squares objective with a wave-loss-based optimization problem, solved efficiently using a Nesterov accelerated gradient (NAG)-based scheme without requiring matrix inversion, thereby improving scalability. Extensive experiments on 30 UCI benchmark datasets demonstrate that Wave-BLS consistently outperforms classical BLS and several robust variants. Statistical validation using Friedman and Nemenyi post-hoc tests confirms the significance of the observed improvements. Furthermore, robustness evaluations under controlled noise and outlier injection reveal that Wave-BLS exhibits substantially slower performance degradation compared to BLS, even in challenging contamination settings. These results establish Wave-BLS as a stable and robust alternative to existing broad learning models for learning under data uncertainty.

An increasing number of scholars use AI to measure variables they subsequently include in downstream analyses. Although AI-measured variables are often analyzed as if observed without error, ignoring prediction errors in automated measurement leads to substantial bias and invalid confidence intervals in downstream analyses, even if AI measurement accuracy is high, e.g., above 90%. Existing solutions, such as design-based supervised learning and prediction-powered inference, combine error-prone AI-based measurements with gold-standard labels, which may be costly and difficult to obtain in some application areas. In this paper, we propose debiased inference with multiple imperfect measurements (DMM), a framework that combines multiple error-prone AI measurements to enable valid downstream inference without gold-standard labels. Building on the established results on CP decomposition, DMM assumes that these measurements are independent conditional on the latent true label and observed unit-level features, such as text features represented by embeddings. This framework allows for unknown misclassification rates to vary across annotation methods (e.g., large language models) and across units of annotation (e.g., texts). Under this assumption, we use semiparametric inference theory to prove that the DMM estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal, enabling valid inference for a wide range of downstream statistical analyses common in the social sciences. Our simulation results show that DMM yields valid inference and that adding accurate, though imperfect, measurements can improve efficiency. Focusing on common applications of large language model annotations, we also develop diagnostics to assess the conditional independence assumption.

Sleep stage classification is important for the diagnosis and management of sleep disorders, yet most automatic staging studies evaluate models against a single reference hypnogram despite known inter-scorer variability. This study investigates whether multi-scored datasets can be used to construct more reliable reference labels from the collective behavior of multiple experts. We use the publicly available DOD-H and DOD-O datasets. EEG (C3-M2) and chin EMG signals were segmented into 30-s epochs, and 30 features were extracted from each modality, yielding 60 features for EEG+EMG. We propose a learning-based hypnogram (LBH) that models the stage-specific behavior of each scorer using confusion matrices derived from machine-learning models. After column normalization, these matrices estimate the probability of each true sleep stage given each scorer's label; probabilities are aggregated across scorers to assign the final label for each epoch. LBH was evaluated with random forest, support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron classifiers under EEG-only and EEG+EMG settings, and compared with the dataset hypnogram (DH) and best-scorer hypnogram (BSH). LBH consistently improved overall performance. The best results were obtained with random forest and EEG+EMG, reaching 86.07% accuracy, 85.46% precision, and 85.29% F1-score on DOD-H, and 86.04% accuracy, 85.21% precision, and 84.70% F1-score on DOD-O. These findings suggest that personalized scorer modeling can improve reference hypnogram construction without discarding information from individual experts.

Pairwise constrained clustering typically relies on hard must-link/cannot-link labels, whereas realistic pairwise supervision may be real-valued and entangle intrinsic ambiguity, expert judgment, and stochastic corruption. Existing deep constrained clustering (DCC) methods mainly target hard, expert-agnostic constraints, treating soft labels mostly numerically rather than semantically. We formalize this setting as uncertainty-aware probabilistic constrained clustering (UPCC), defining a canonical aleatoric target through a heterogeneous observation process and analyzing its conditional identifiability. We introduce ProbPair, an angular pairwise objective for probabilistic relations, and build ECI-PP, an estimator--corrector--integrator framework that refines imperfect supervision via belief estimation, correction, and reliability-aware integration. Across challenging probabilistic supervision settings, experiments on diverse benchmarks show that ECI-PP outperforms state-of-the-art DCC methods and remains robust with a shared default configuration.

Public chest X-ray repositories are widely used to train medical AI systems, yet their labels are typically extracted from radiology reports rather than verified directly on images. As a result, repository labels are often treated as image-level ground truth without validating whether they reflect what is actually visible in the radiograph. We introduce Repository Supervision Auditing (RSA), a framework that evaluates repository-derived labels against expert image-level annotations before model development. Using cardiomegaly in MIMIC-CXR as a case study, RSA compares repository labels with radiologist-reviewed image annotations, characterizes disagreement sources, and builds a curated cohort for deployment-oriented evaluation. Repository-derived cardiomegaly labels showed near-zero agreement with expert image-level assessment, identifying only 1% of expert-confirmed cases. Most discrepancies resulted from non-mention rather than explicit report negation, with expert-confirmed cardiomegaly identified in nearly half of studies assigned a repository-derived No Finding label. Using the resulting expert-curated cohort, a DenseNet121 model achieved a test ROC-AUC of 0.853. These findings show that repository labels may not reliably represent image-level truth and highlight supervision auditing as a critical step for developing trustworthy medical imaging AI.

The problem of learning from pairwise comparisons has been widely studied across many domains such as recommendation systems, social choice, and more recently, fine-tuning large language models. In this problem, the goal is to learn item rewards based on pairwise comparisons between them. In many scenarios, these comparisons are elicited from crowdworkers using platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, Scale AI, etc. However, crowdworkers are often unreliable due to limited domain knowledge or revenue-maximizing (spamming) behavior. In this work, our goal is to understand whether worker reliability (competency) can be learned jointly with item rewards. To this end, we adopt the Boltzmann-rational model for pairwise comparisons, which extends the Bradley-Terry-Luce model by incorporating worker competencies. We derive an EM-based algorithm for learning under this model by introducing Polya-Gamma latent variables to transform the logistic likelihood into a conditionally Gaussian form, enabling tractable optimization and leading to a simplified $Q$ function in the E-step of the algorithm. This technique allows us to reduce our formulation to a matrix sensing problem, using which we establish theoretical convergence guarantees for our algorithm. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets. These experiments demonstrate the advantages of using our algorithm over several baselines and confirm its strong robustness to both spammers and adversarial workers, highlighting its practical effectiveness in realistic crowdsourcing and reward learning settings. The code and data is publicly available at https://github.com/KaustubhShejole/BoRa_EM.

Semi-supervised adaptation of vision foundation models (VFMs) commonly freezes the pretrained backbone and updates lightweight modules such as LoRA. However, pseudo-labels have mixed reliability, and a single LoRA adapter must absorb reliable, ambiguous, and noisy gradients in the same low-rank space. This can make VFM adaptation sensitive to pseudo-label noise. We propose \textbf{TriNoL}, a \textbf{Tri}ple-expert learning framework from \textbf{No}isy \textbf{L}abels for semi-supervised VFM adaptation. TriNoL routes unlabeled samples into three confidence regions and assigns them to three LoRA experts: a Positive Expert for high-confidence pseudo-labels, an Alignment Expert for medium-confidence ambiguous samples, and a Negative Expert for low-confidence noisy samples. The VFM backbone remains frozen, and only the LoRA experts and classifier head are updated. By separating different pseudo-label reliability regions into specialized adaptation paths, TriNoL improves robustness to noisy supervision while keeping the training cost low.

Neural network classifiers trained by cross-entropy minimization are highly sensitive to label noise and adversarial contamination. While robust alternatives offer bounded influence and resistance to corruption, their statistical foundations in the deep learning setting are insufficient due to a fundamental difficulty: neural parameterizations are non-identifiable, so the population loss minimizer is an equivalence class of parameters, not a unique point. We develop a consistency theory for robust neural classifiers based on the S-divergence family that requires no identifiability assumption. Casting training as stochastic optimization over a non-identifiable parameter space, we prove that empirical S-divergence minimizers converge to the population-optimal equivalence class under mild regularity conditions, and verify these conditions for three architecture choices. We further establish that limit points of the robust training algorithm are stationary points of the empirical objective. Experiments on vision and language benchmark datasets confirm that S-divergence training maintains clean-data accuracy while exhibiting performance competitive with existing robust methods.

Multimodal emotion recognition often treats self-reported labels as reliable supervision while overlooking self-report unreliability and cross-modal conflict. We propose \textbf{CONFER}, a graph-based conflict-aware evidence negotiation framework for weakly supervised multimodal emotion recognition. CONFER represents each modality expert as a node with a predictive belief, boundary-based uncertainty, and runtime reliability estimated from historical out-of-fold performance and current-sample uncertainty. Uncertainty-aware compatibility and reliability-directed asymmetric edge weights govern iterative message-passing negotiation, followed by peer-supported prediction readout. Conflict reduction, residual disagreement, and mean modality uncertainty further characterize three regimes---Consensus, Dissent, and Ambiguity---for sample-specific weak-label calibration. We evaluate CONFER on AMIGOS, MAHNOB-HCI, and DEAP under subject-dependent 10-fold and strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) protocols. CONFER achieves competitive performance, reaching \textbf{0.873} accuracy on AMIGOS-V and \textbf{0.854} accuracy on MAHNOB-V under strict LOSO evaluation. Further analyses show larger negotiation gains on high-conflict samples and improved robustness to weak-label corruption, indicating that cross-modal conflict provides useful information for both directional modality coordination and supervision-reliability estimation.

The current state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep randomized neural networks, such as deep Random Vector Functional Link (dRVFL) and ensemble deep RVFL (edRVFL), treat all training samples uniformly, which limits their robustness and effectiveness when applied to real-world datasets containing noise and outliers. Furthermore, the propagation of contaminated features across hidden layers negatively influences the decision-making capability of these models. To overcome these limitations, we propose intuitionistic fuzzy dRVFL (IF-dRVFL) and intuitionistic fuzzy edRVFL (IF-edRVFL) frameworks that enhance model robustness. The proposed models unify intuitionistic fuzzy theory to exploit sample neighborhood information in the kernel space by jointly considering membership and non-membership degrees for each sample. Membership degrees are computed based on the distance of samples from their respective class centroids, while non-membership degrees quantify sample heterogeneity within local neighborhoods. These measures are employed to assign adaptive weights to training samples, enabling effective discrimination among clean, noisy, and outlier data points. Extensive experiments conducted on UCI and KEEL benchmark datasets, with and without the presence of Gaussian noise, demonstrate the superiority of the proposed IF-dRVFL and IF-edRVFL models over existing SOTA fuzzy and non-fuzzy approaches. The source code is available at https://github.com/mtanveer1/IF-edRVFL.

Deep learning has achieved great success in recent years thanks to the availability of high-quality, well-annotated training data. However, this requirement is often not met in real-world applications. Weakly supervised learning aims to train an accurate model with incomplete, inexact, or inaccurate supervision. In this chapter, we will discuss recent advances in this field, including new supervision paradigms, relaxed assumptions, and practical solutions. First, we introduce a new weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference classification and propose consistent approaches to solve it. Next, we investigate complementary-label learning, a weakly supervised multi-class classification problem. Our proposed approaches are based on more relaxed assumptions about the data generation process than existing consistent approaches. Lastly, we present an evaluation framework for partial-label learning, another popular multi-class weakly supervised learning problem, in order to promote fair and realistic evaluation of algorithms in this field.

Adaptive data-cleaning methods replace manual filtering thresholds with data-driven partitions. However, changing the partition granularity, the number of groups used to segment samples by estimated corruption risk, can implicitly shift the decision boundary and alter the overall number of removed samples. This creates a bias known as removal-budget confounding, where apparent gains in metrics like precision or false-positive rate reflect a smaller removal budget rather than superior corruption discrimination. To address this evaluation bias, we introduce an operating-point-aware evaluation framework that evaluates methods using matched-budget and matched-recall controls alongside threshold-independent metrics (AUROC and AUPRC). We test this framework on a multi-cue adaptive cleaner redesign featuring a reweighted learning-difficulty cue, an auxiliary Euclidean-distance cue, and increased partition granularity intended to isolate clean-but-difficult samples. While naive evaluations (assessing configurations at their own induced operating points) suggest substantial performance improvements for the redesign, these gains disappear once operating points are equalized. False-positive decomposition reveals that clean-but-difficult samples primarily drive error counts at low corruption rates, become threshold-dependent at moderate corruption, and contribute negligibly under severe corruption. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-100 demonstrate that most performance differences observed in naive evaluation shrink or vanish at low-to-moderate corruption when operating points are matched. True ranking advantages only remain in specific low-prevalence settings and in high-recall regions under severe corruption. These findings highlight that adaptive cleaning methods must be benchmarked at matched operating points to ensure performance gains reflect genuine corruption discrimination.

Hypergraph neural networks (HGNNs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing complex higher-order relationships. However, their performance is highly dependent on labeled data, making them vulnerable to label noise. Despite advances in learning with label noise (LLN) and graph learning with label noise (GLN), noisy-label learning on hypergraphs remains underexplored. In this paper, we present a systematic study of hypergraph node classification under label noise. First, we adapt representative LLN and GLN methods to hypergraphs and evaluate them under a unified benchmark, revealing the limitations of existing robust learning strategies for hypergraphs. Building on this, we propose a new hypergraph robust framework, HyperTrust, which first estimates hyperedge trustworthiness through a pretraining-based, entropy-aware strategy, and then incorporates the HyperedgeBoost module to enhance reliable supervision by connecting unlabeled nodes to trustworthy hyperedges, as well as the HyperedgePrune module to suppress noisy propagation by removing untrustworthy node-hyperedge incidences. Finally, two modules work collaboratively to adjust the hypergraph structure and generate final predictions. Extensive experiments and theoretical analysis demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of HyperTrust on multiple hypergraph datasets under various noisy settings. Our work provides a unified benchmark and an effective solution for hypergraph learning with label noise and lays a foundation for future research in this direction.

Label noise is common in medical imaging datasets due to factors such as inter-rater variability, annotation errors, and ambiguous cases. This can severely undermine the reliability and clinical effectiveness of machine learning models trained using those datasets. To address this challenge, we introduce Lightweight Noise Correction (LiNC), which adds a single trainable trust parameter per training sample and learns when to use the observed label and when to defer to the model during a standard training loop. The key idea is to train using a convex combination of the observed label and the model's own predictive distribution, controlled by a per-sample trust parameter. We show that the gradient of this objective drives trust values in opposite directions for clean versus noisy samples in the early training phase, yielding separable trust distributions. We use a 3-component Gaussian Mixture Model over the trust values to separate them into clean, ambiguous, and noisy cases and then execute a short soft-correction phase on the noisy cases and a final hard correction phase. Experiments on ten 2D datasets from MedMNISTv2 under label noise of up to 50% show consistent gains in accuracy and strong mislabel detection. LiNC adds negligible asymptotic overhead: the training-time complexity remains dominated by the base network, with additional memory growing linearly with the size of the training set.

Supervised deep learning models rely on large, accurately labeled datasets, yet noisy annotations are often unavoidable and can severely degrade performance under high noise levels. Recent state-of-the-art methods tackle this by using sample selection strategies that exploit the memorization effect to filter out clean data for semi-supervised learning. However, these methods struggle with extreme noise, class imbalance, and require careful tuning or prior noise knowledge. To address these limitations, we propose XMix, a novel framework that leverages local smoothness in the self-supervised feature space to systematically enhance all stages of the sample selection process, without dependence on potentially corrupted labels. First, XMix estimates the noise rate using maximum likelihood among self-supervised feature neighbors. Second, these neighbors then help identify additional clean samples and ensure balanced selection across classes during sample selection. Finally, in the semi-supervised learning phase, XMix uses neighboring samples to generate more reliable pseudo-labels. Our empirical results show that XMix substantially outperforms existing methods in extremely noisy environments and maintains superior performance in standard LNL benchmarks.

Conformalized selection has been widely applied to select high-quality candidates from large datasets with rigorous uncertainty quantification, such as reliable labeling, drug discovery, and the alignment of large language models. Nevertheless, existing methods assume clean responses on calibration data, an assumption that rarely holds in practice. In this paper, we formulate the above tasks as selecting candidates with true predicted labels or with responses exceeding certain values. We demonstrate that existing conformal selection methods fail to control the false discovery rate (FDR) or suffer from severe power loss under contaminated calibration data. To that end, we propose Robust Conformalized Selection (RCS), a unified framework for selective classification with valid FDR control under general label contamination. The key insight of RCS lies in a novel statistical reduction: by separately conditioning on different classes, we translate the intractable label noise into a localized covariate shift problem, which then enables a covariate-adjusted empirical-Bayes-type estimate of the number of false selections. Statistical properties such as the asymptotic FDR control, power optimality, and robustness of RCS are established. We further develop an instantiation of RCS under randomized response model, and also apply RCS to the task of selecting candidates with large response values. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of RCS.

Existing BraTS-GLI datasets provide a widely used benchmark for adult glioma MRI segmentation, but their task definition focuses on tumor subregions and does not systematically represent coexisting white matter hyperintensities (WMH). In joint segmentation settings, such unlabeled abnormalities introduce task-specific label noise by treating pathological regions as normal tissue. To address this limitation, we introduce BraTS-GLI Anatomy-Lesion, a controlled-access, labels-only derived resource built from the BraTS 2023-GLI training cohort. The resource provides 1,251 unified eight-class anatomy-lesion label sets aligned with the original four-modal MRI cases, including image-repair labels for 116 cases requiring repaired imaging inputs. The cohort is organized into a 394-case purified subset and an 857-case extended subset, with case-level metadata covering label source, image-repair requirements, quality-control status, access conditions, checksums, and release boundaries. Compared with the original BraTS-GLI annotations, the resource substantially expands foreground supervision by incorporating healthy brain tissues and previously unlabeled coexisting abnormalities within a unified label space. A validation study using MedNeXt and T1/FLAIR inputs suggests that WMH-aware supervision preserves healthy-tissue segmentation performance across both in-domain GLI and external WMH datasets, while improving sensitivity to coexisting lesions relative to noisy-control training. The resource is intended for scientific research and supports joint anatomy-lesion supervision, label-noise analysis, and reproducible evaluation. Data are available at https://www.synapse.org/Synapse:syn75210889/wiki/, and code is available at https://github.com/xyx200/brats-gli-anatomy-lesion-code. The data resource DOI is https://doi.org/10.7303/SYN75210889.

Training deep learning models with freely available web images can reduce their dependence on costly manual annotations. Although webly supervised learning has been widely studied for single-label recognition, its multi-label counterpart remains underexplored, partly due to the lack of unified benchmarks and fair comparison protocols. To address this gap, we construct a benchmark for webly supervised multi-label recognition (WS-MLR), including Web-COCO and Web-Pascal, and re-implement representative baselines under a unified setting. The two datasets cover the same 80 and 20 categories as MS-COCO and Pascal VOC, respectively, and contain about 300 thousand images retrieved from the Internet using category-word combinations as search keywords. We further propose a Dual-Branch Multi-Label Contrastive Learning (DBMLCL) framework, which learns category-specific instance-level and category-level representations together with their similarities to identify and correct noisy labels. Extensive experiments on the benchmark demonstrate that DBMLCL achieves superior performance compared to representative baselines.

Text-attributed graphs (TAGs) are an important graph data form that combine relational structure with rich node text. However, real-world TAGs are often imperfect, with quality issues arising from text, structure, and labels, and typically manifesting as sparsity, noise, and imbalance. These dimensions define nine representative degradation scenarios that can substantially affect TAG learning. Although prior studies have explored specific mitigation strategies, existing evidence remains fragmented across degradation types, datasets, tasks, and model families, leaving TAG robustness insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we present OpenRTAG, a robustness benchmark for text-attributed graph learning. OpenRTAG organizes TAG quality issues into a unified 3 * 3 taxonomy and supports standardized evaluation across nine TAG datasets and three downstream tasks. It systematically evaluates scenario validity and model sensitivity, compares traditional GNNs, LLM-GNNs, and a representative GFM, investigates the effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness of scenario-matched baselines, and further examines model behavior under composite degradation scenarios. OpenRTAG provides a standardized testbed for understanding robustness in TAG learning under realistic low-quality settings.

In recent years, multi-view learning has attracted increasing attention, as it integrates the complementary information of heterogeneous views. Most existing multi-view classification methods rely on accurate annotations to guarantee performance. However, noisy labels are ubiquitous in practice due to imperfect annotation, and the refinement signals that existing methods derive from models trained on such noisy supervision can gradually lose their reliability. To deal with this problem, we propose a novel Global Anchor-based Label Auditing method (GALA) for multi-view classification to resist the negative impact of noisy labels. Specifically, we construct a global anchor for each class in every view, which aggregates the samples of the whole class and thus offers a stable reference insensitive to individual predictions. Then, each view measures how close an instance is to the anchor of its observed label relative to the nearest competing anchor, and the per-view evaluations are fused with the classifier confidence into a cross-view audit score. Based on the audit scores, suspicious samples are assigned small weights, and an adaptive correction strategy rewrites a label only when the anchor-based candidate agrees with the classifier prediction. Finally, the corrected labels in turn refine the anchors and supervise noise-robust representation learning. Extensive experiments on six datasets demonstrate that GALA outperforms eight state-of-the-art methods, especially under high noise rates.