Multimodal Model Evaluation

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

49 papers in the last four weeks, up 48% on the four weeks before. 0.5% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 496

Aug 10, 2026cs.CV

Right Answer, Wrong Heat: Explanation-Aware Evaluation and Thermal-Grounded Feedback for MLLMs on Infrared Images

General-purpose multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly applied to infrared images, where they are commonly scored by answer accuracy alone. However, a correct answer does not ensure that the model's explanation is grounded in infrared thermal evidence. We introduce an explanation-aware evaluation framework that separates answer correctness, output-level explanation groundedness, and thermal grounding for infrared visual questions. Using a Dual-LLM Consensus Judge with a preliminary human-anchor calibration check, we find that correct answers can still rely on weak or visible-light evidence; withholding the original infrared image and showing only a visible-like rendering erodes thermal grounding with little accuracy change; and this erosion is observed most strongly for more capable models but disappears when infrared remains available. We further propose Thermal-Grounded Feedback (TGF), a training-free feedback loop that diagnoses explanation-side failures and revises the explanation while preserving the selected answer. On local paired-input validation, TGF improves explanation-side grounding without changing answers. These findings suggest that future trustworthy MLLMs for infrared scene understanding should be evaluated and developed to produce thermally grounded explanations rather than merely accurate answers.

Yongsong Huang, Xiaofeng Liu, Tomo Miyazaki +2

Tohoku University · Yale University

Vision-Language Models Vision-Language Grounding Explainability Evaluation Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 9, 2026cs.AI

FitAQA: A Benchmark of Fitness Action Quality Assessment for Multimodal Large Language Models

Fitness Action Quality Assessment (AQA) is important for intelligent sports training, yet the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in this setting remain underexplored. Existing benchmarks rely on action-specific annotation schemes and focus primarily on final assessment outputs, offering limited insight into how models assess exercise quality. We introduce FitAQA, a systematic benchmark for evaluating MLLMs in fitness AQA, containing 2,219 videos and 5,512 QA instances across 30 bodyweight exercises. In collaboration with experts in sports science, we develop a unified form error taxonomy that defines 38 recurring form errors within six complementary quality dimensions: alignment, symmetry, stability, coordination, tempo, and completeness. This taxonomy provides a shared assessment framework across different exercises. FitAQA further formulates three evaluation tasks: perception for recognizing relevant visual evidence, judgement for combining that evidence with domain knowledge to assess execution correctness, and temporal grounding for localizing form errors over time. Extensive evaluation shows that current MLLMs still struggle to assess exercise quality comprehensively and localize form errors precisely. Controlled experiments further indicate that visual perception is a key bottleneck, as judgement performance improves substantially when ground-truth perceptual evidence is provided. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Kelly0510/FitAQA.

Kaili Zheng, Kaiwen Wang, Xun Zhu +3

Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University · Xinjiang Region Sports Science Research Center · College of AI, Tsinghua University +1

Multimodal Large Language Models Action Quality Assessment Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 9, 2026cs.CV

TomaMMU: A Comprehensive Multimodal Understanding Benchmark for Tomato Leaf Diseases

To address this gap, we introduce TomaMMU, a large-scale Tomato leaf disease MultiModal Understanding dataset, alongside TomaBench, a benchmark for evaluating VLMs on tomato disease understanding. TomaMMU comprises 28,808 high-quality images spanning 15 categories and 213,119 human-annotated visual question-answer pairs, generated through a three-stage pipeline comprising Data Collection, Human Annotation, and Question-Answer Generation. Building on this foundation, TomaBench organizes seven agricultural tasks into a hierarchical three-level taxonomy spanning Basic Perception, Pathology Understanding, and Expert Diagnosis, which together enable systematic evaluation from low-level visual recognition to high-level diagnostic reasoning. The tasks assess visual symptom recognition, taxonomic relationships, and diagnostic reasoning, offering a comprehensive view of how well models grasp plant pathology. Our results pronounced gaps in fine-grained recognition and factually grounded reasoning with 14 state-of-the-art VLMs, consistently underperforming on both challenging MCQs and open-ended questions. These results suggest that current VLMs struggle to translate visual perception into reliable diagnostic knowledge, motivating the need for targeted domain adaptation. Simple fine-tuning on TomaMMU substantially narrows this gap, boosting accuracy on challenging MCQs to 96.09%, outperforming recent VLMs, and pointing toward promising directions for future work. All data and code is available in https://huggingface.co/datasets/enalis/TomaMMU.

Gia-Han Truong, Khang Nguyen Quoc, Luyl-Da Quach

Department of Information Technology, FPT University, Can Tho, Vietnam · School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea

Vision-Language Models Plant Disease Classification Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 8, 2026cs.AI

Large Multimodal Agents for Intelligent Transportation Systems: Architectures, Evidence, and Deployment Challenges

Large multimodal agents (LMAs) are increasingly proposed for intelligent transportation systems (ITS), but existing studies often conflate multimodality, agency, empirical performance, and deployment readiness. This review provides an auditable evidence map of 42 primary study families released between January 2023 and 3 August 2026 within a corpus of 91 mapped sources. It distinguishes model-level, system-level, and hybrid multimodality and classifies each family by system architecture and action authority. Evidence is assessed independently through functional capability (C0-C3), validation setting (E0-E4), three evidence propositions (P1-P3), and eight methodological-concern domains (Q1-Q8). Transportation semantics (P1) are directly evaluated in 23 families and multidimensional integration (P3) in 24; 19 families directly evaluate both. Evidence reconciliation (P2) remains unresolved because no family demonstrates the complete provenance-challenge-handling-comparison-outcome chain. Fourteen families reach C3, but 13 remain at E2; only one reaches E3 and none reaches E4. Across ITS domains, LMAs are best supported for semantic interpretation, intent translation, evidence organisation, scenario authoring, explanation, and specialist-tool coordination. Numerical forecasting, optimisation, simulation fidelity, hard constraints, low-level control, safety fallback, and final authority should remain with independently verifiable specialist systems or accountable humans. The review therefore supports bounded orchestration rather than replacement and provides a matched comparative evaluation protocol and staged roadmap for accountable deployment. The living evidence repository is available at https://github.com/pangjunbiao/ITS-LMA-Review.

Muhammad Ayub Sabir, Shaohong Zheng, Zhiyu Qu +2

Intelligent Transportation Systems Multimodal Agents Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 8, 2026cs.AI

Locating Failure in Multi-Page Visually Rich Document Understanding: An Empirical Attribution

Multi-page visually-rich document understanding (MP-VRDU) requires managing evidence that is sparse, spread across pages, and often exceeds a model's context window. Prior work has produced competing, largely untested claims about how these systems should be built. We attribute incorrect answers to three failure modes, representation, selection, and reasoning, and isolate each over a multi-page document understanding dataset by intervening on one while holding the others fixed. We find that vision is necessary but does not replace text extraction, that missing pages bound accuracy while distractors cost little, and that reasoners fail to integrate evidence across pages even when it is fully supplied. Prompting can shift reasoning behaviour substantially, improving some outcomes at the expense of others. We translate these findings into guidance for building such systems under a fixed compute budget.

Lewei Xu, Yihao Ding, Zihan Xu +5

The University of Western Australia · The University of Melbourne · Weill Cornell Medicine

Document Understanding Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Document Image Understanding

Aug 8, 2026cs.CV

Forged Peer Judgments Mislead Multimodal LLM Judge Panels: Source-Blind Anchoring and Panel-Consensus Verification

Multimodal LLM judge panels can cross-reference peers, but a quoted peer judgment may itself be untrusted. We expose source-blind anchoring as a text-level attack surface in vision-language model (VLM) panels. Quoting independent visual judgments creates large anchoring gaps (19--26 percentage points) under both self and peer framing. A matched-content, label-only control changes the broken rate by only

-0.17

pp (95% CI

[-0.68,0.35]

), showing that the self/peer label itself does not explain the effect. Under our tested construction, deliberately generated, concise wrong quotes overturn originally-correct verdicts 1.5--2.7

\times

more often than naturally occurring wrong peer statements, with bootstrap 95% CIs excluding parity across two datasets and seven VLM judges. Because the two statement populations differ in selection and form, this ratio measures differential damage under the tested attack rather than a provenance-only causal effect. We then introduce panel-consensus verification, which cross-checks a quote against independently collected blind votes. It blocks 84.9% of fabricated attacks, cuts their net harm by 97.5%, and preserves the positive but statistically inconclusive point estimate for genuine peer information under leave-one-out re-verification. These results identify a low-cost attack surface and a concrete defense for safer multimodal collaborative evaluation.

Yang Shu

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

LLM-as-a-Judge Adversarial Attacks on LLMs Vision-Language Model-as-a-Judge Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 7, 2026cs.AI

LMM Modality Transfer: A Pre-requisite for Autonomous GIS Agents

AI models are becoming increasingly adept at understanding and processing spatial information, thereby facilitating agentic problem-solving in spatial tasks and workflows. However, most of the research on their spatial capabilities (e.g., spatial reasoning) has focused on the textual modality as input and output. This contrasts with the human approach to GIS workflows, where text and visual modalities are often used together, interchangeably, and in a complementary manner. Thus, to truly achieve an automated GIS analysis pipeline or carry out human-designed GIS workflows, AI models --- Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in particular --- need to be able to seamlessly transition between image- and text-based modalities that are traditionally used in such workflows. We present a modality transfer task that (1) asks an LMM to first describe an input image of colored squares in a regular grid, and (2) asks a new LMM instance to re-generate an image of the original spatial scene using the textual description output by the former model. This task quantifies the ability of LMMs to transfer spatial information between image and text modalities. Ultimately, by examining the modality transfer capability of LMMs through the lens of spatial information theory, this work highlights a critical bottleneck: achieving strong and robust geospatial understanding in LMMs requires rigorous, multi-modal alignment. Our results indicate that recent LMMs (here from OpenAI) still struggle with modality transfer, when tasked with re-generating an image of a simple spatial grid of color squares.

Ivan Majic, Zexian Huang, Franziska Hübl +5

Graz University of Technology, Austria · University of Vienna, Austria · University of Liverpool, UK

Cross-Modal Alignment Multimodal Large Language Models Geospatial Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Aug 7, 2026cs.AI

Science Edge Evaluation: SEE the Missing Step Toward Real Scientific Discovery

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in scientific discovery, yet it remains unclear whether they can support complex real laboratory science. Here we introduce Science Edge Evaluation (SEE), a multimodal benchmark of expert-curated questions grounded in peer-reviewed literature and experimental practice in chemistry, biology, and materials science. Evaluation of 19 multimodal large language models (MLLMs) shows that even the best-performing model reaches only 48.7% accuracy. Moreover, general-purpose models outperform science-specialized models on average. In the visual-agent evaluation, the use of tools increases the best accuracy to 52.7%. Tool use can expand the information available to models, but more information does not necessarily lead to reliable scientific reasoning. The key challenge is whether models can manage tool-derived information within the boundaries of the original experimental evidence. Together, these findings reveal that current MLLMs still cannot reliably make justified and evidence-bounded inferences from experimental results, which is an essential capability in real scientific discovery. Bridging this gap requires MLLMs to transition from explaining established scientific concepts to deriving novel and evidence-based insights from experimental data.

Taolin Han, Yuchen Zhang, Jinghang Wang +22

1Alibaba Group · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Taolin Han1,3* +28

Scientific Reasoning Scientific Discovery Scientific Reasoning in Language Models Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 6, 2026cs.AI

Can MLLMs Decode the Creative Leap? Introducing C4 for Cross-Concept Understanding

Creative capabilities of MLLMs matter in design, communication, education, and human--AI collaboration, yet remain difficult to evaluate because explicit targets and reward signals are scarce compared with accuracy-oriented tasks. Cross-concept understanding is a core cognitive capacity underlying receptive creativity. It enables a perceiver to recover intended meaning from non-obvious but meaningful conceptual relations. We operationalize item construction as cross-concept encoding and model inference as cross-concept decoding. We introduce C4, a cognition-inspired evaluation framework for Chengyu (Chinese idiom)-based Cross-Concept Creativity. Its encoding component maps target slots to imageable substitute concepts along bridge paths in a manually annotated and third-party-reviewed cross-concept network, enabling batch generation with explicit structure, difficulty indexed by bridge count and depth, and exact answers. Using this framework, we instantiate the C4 Evaluation Set (C4-Eval), comprising 184 synthetic items and 37 human-created cross-concept chengyu figures collected from online sources. We manually construct and review cross-concept relations, bridge paths, and reasoning processes for the collected figures. Each C4-Eval item is instantiated in five task settings, yielding 884 primary answer-recovery cases. Across ten evaluated MLLMs, the strongest closed models reach 50.7% and 48.0% primary accuracy, while open-source models remain substantially lower. Candidate constraints improve accuracy sharply, but bridge hints and explanation requests provide only modest gains. These results expose a substantial gap in how current MLLMs decode creatively encoded meaning through cross-concept relations. The code is in the supplementary material.

Ming Wang, Yuqing Zhang, Tingna Xie +5

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Liaoning, China · School of Computing and Information Systems, Singapore Management University, Singapore · School of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Shandong, China

Creativity Assessment Multimodal Large Language Models VLM Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 6, 2026cs.AI

Seeing Is Not Deciding: Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs?

Large language models are increasingly applied as autonomous decision-making agents. However, in executive business decisions, existing benchmarks are limited to textonly settings. This makes it unclear whether models can perceive visual business evidence and effectively integrate it to improve decision quality. We introduce C-SUITEBENCH, a controlled multimodal benchmark that includes five decision tasks under paired text-only and multimodal conditions across 50 scenarios. We place nine frontier models in the role of a chief executive officer and evaluate their decision-making ability. Multimodal inputs consistently improve evidence-centric reasoning, with the largest and most reliable gains appearing in risk forecasting and board-facing justification. However, we uncover a multimodal integration paradox: adding visual business information degrades constrained resource allocation for all nine models, even as visual grounding itself improves. Ablation experiments reveal that this failure emerges from signal crowding, although each visual channel helps individually, their combination disrupts constraint satisfaction during decoding. These findings demonstrate that visual perception and constrained action are separable bottlenecks in multimodal agents, and that indiscriminate visual augmentation can harm high-stakes decision making, motivating selective grounding strategies for future executive AI systems.

Yuyang Dai, Xueqing Peng, Yuxia Wang +2

INSAIT, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria · Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA · Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Multimodal Grounding LLM Decision-Making Multimodal Agents Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 6, 2026cs.CL

M $^3$ R-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Metaphor Understanding

Metaphor enables the understanding of abstract concepts through cross-domain mappings while conveying affective attitudes. In multimodal scenarios, visual and textual information jointly construct Target--Source mappings, requiring both conceptual understanding and cross-modal reasoning. However, existing benchmarks mainly evaluate metaphor understanding through isolated subtasks and lack evidence-grounded explanations, making it difficult to assess whether models establish mappings grounded in visual and textual cues.To address these limitations, we introduce M

^3

R-Bench, a unified and evidence-grounded benchmark containing 1,000 image--text instances with human-verified annotations. Guided by Conceptual Metaphor Theory and theories of nonliteral language understanding, M

^3

R-Bench provides joint annotations for metaphor occurrence, Target--Source mapping, sentiment, and stage-wise explanations following ``evidence identification--mapping establishment--sentiment inference.''Evaluations on M

^3

R-Bench reveal that existing models often overlook visual evidence, rely on superficial textual cues, and produce inaccurate Target--Source mappings, exposing a cross-modal evidence--mapping mismatch. To address this mismatch, we propose M

^3

R-Reasoner, which combines curriculum-based reasoning supervision with task-aware reinforcement learning to align model reasoning with metaphor interpretation. Experiments show that, with only an 8B-parameter backbone, M

^3

R-Reasoner outperforms larger proprietary MLLMs across four unified-task metrics and improves Visual Evidence and Sentiment Justification scores over GPT-5.5 by 28.45 and 30.11 points, respectively, while surpassing Claude-Sonnet-4.6 by 8.00 points in mean rubric score. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/hongshi4/M3R-Bench.

Hong Jiang, Junnan Zhu, Jingwang Huang +9

School of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore +3

Figurative Language Understanding Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Aug 5, 2026cs.AI

C $^3$ PO: Evaluating Cross-Modal Composition and Counterfactual Performance in Omnimodal Models

Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can process diverse sensory inputs, yet their reasoning remains heavily biased toward a dominant modality, resulting in brittle cross-modal reasoning. We introduce C

^3

PO, a benchmark of 3,404 samples spanning video, audio, image, and text, evaluating two abilities: information composition (fusing dispersed evidence) and counterfactual conflict (resolving deliberate contradictions). C

^3

PO's paired IC/CC structure and four-tier design enable targeted diagnosis of when and why cross-modal reasoning fails. Built through a fully automatic pipeline using 25 logically grounded templates, C

^3

PO reveals that while humans achieve 88.64% accuracy, the best model (Gemini-3.1-Pro) reaches only 73.17%, with open-source models collapsing under conflict. Through attention probes, we find 86-95% of failures stem from modality dominance: models commit to one modality while ignoring contradictory evidence, concentrating 87-95% of attention on text. Mid-layer attention entropy predicts correctness-sustained exploration succeeds, premature collapse fails. The 56-point accuracy gap between equally complex templates reveals that performance depends on modalities' structural roles in conflict resolution, not combinations. These findings show multimodal perception does not guarantee robust reasoning; architectures must enable sustained cross-modal attention to avoid premature

Swapnanil Mukherjee, Agyeya Negi, Tanuja Ganu +1

Microsoft Research India · IIIT Hyderabad, India

Modality Imbalance Multimodal Reasoning Cross-Modal Attention Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 5, 2026cs.CV

The First EgoCross Challenge at EgoVis 2026: Cross-Domain Egocentric Video Question Answering

EgoCross is a cross-domain egocentric video question answering benchmark designed to evaluate whether multimodal large language models can generalize beyond common daily-life scenarios. The first EgoCross Challenge was hosted at the Third EgoVis Workshop at CVPR 2026 and evaluated models on first-person videos from four target domains: surgery, industrial assembly, extreme sports, and animal perspectives. Each test example consists of an egocentric video clip, a question, and four candidate answers, from which the model must select the correct option. This technical report introduces the challenge task, benchmark resources, and two official Codabench tracks. The Source-Limited Track restricts participants to the official baseline model and a small support set, whereas the Open-Source Track permits broader choices of models and training data under rules that prohibit the manual construction of target-domain training data. In total, the challenge received more than 1,500 submissions from over 130 participants, with 19 teams participating in the Open-Source Track and 38 teams in the Source-Limited Track. We further present the official leaderboard results and summarize the winning solutions from both tracks. We hope that this report will serve as a useful technical reference for advancing cross-domain egocentric video understanding. All resources, including the challenge data, baseline implementation, and code released by the winning teams, are made publicly available.

Yuqian Fu, Tianwen Qian, Yanjun Li +30

Egocentric Video QA Video QA Egocentric Video Understanding Cross-Domain Generalization Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 5, 2026cs.CL

RESPClinBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Clinical Decision-Making and Longitudinal Disease Management in Respiratory Specialty Care

Background: Respiratory specialty care requires multimodal interpretation, longitudinal risk assessment, guideline-concordant intervention, and whole-course management, which are poorly represented by examination-oriented medical benchmarks. Objective: To develop RESPClinBench, a real-world scenario-based benchmark for respiratory clinical decision-making, and evaluate seven contemporary large language models across AECOPD-PIM and PNBIM. Methods: RESPClinBench cases were adapted from de-identified respiratory clinical data. Three attending-level respiratory physicians revised cases, reference answers, and atomic clinical-action points, while one senior respiratory specialist performed cross-review and final adjudication. AECOPD-PIM comprised 427 open-ended COPD cases, and PNBIM comprised 196 multimodal pulmonary nodule cases combining chest CT with structured clinical information. Seven models generated 4,361 responses through standardized API inference with temperature 0 and a maximum output length of 8192 tokens. An automated framework calculated the final score as the arithmetic mean of atomic-action recall and rubric-based LLM-as-a-Judge assessment. Results: Across 623 cases, the mean final score was 68.58. Qwen3.6-27B ranked first overall at 71.22, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B led PNBIM at 72.48, and Qwen3.6-27B led AECOPD-PIM at 71.11. Imaging hallucination and serious medical risk occurred in 31.85% and 8.16% of PNBIM responses; medication-safety risk and serious medical risk occurred in 26.93% and 1.44% of AECOPD-PIM responses. Conclusions: RESPClinBench identifies task-specific limitations in multimodal pulmonary nodule assessment and longitudinal COPD management. Combining explicit clinical-action coverage, holistic evaluation, and independent safety flags provides a clinically grounded basis for model selection and prospective validation.

Mouxiao Bian, Zhi Chen, Ruiyao Chen +8

Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanhai, China · Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China · First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China +1

LLM Safety Benchmarks Healthcare Clinical Decision-Making Clinical Language Model Evaluation Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.CV

SIGNPOST-Bench: Benchmarking Text-Vision Conflict Resolution in Multimodal Large Language Models

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) make grounded predictions in real-world scenes by combining visual and textual cues, yet existing benchmarks rarely reveal how they arbitrate between these evidence sources when they conflict. We introduce SIGNPOST-Bench, a controlled counterfactual benchmark for evaluating text-vision conflict resolution. Each source image is transformed into a counterfactual quintuplet of Original, Blank, Similar, Random, and Adversarial variants. Synthetic, localized scene-text interventions are designed to preserve non-textual content, enabling paired measurements of changes in localization performance and directed shifts toward geographic targets introduced by conflicting text. SIGNPOST-Bench contains 5,111 counterfactual groups and 25,555 image variants from four datasets. We evaluate 20 MLLMs from seven providers. Compared with Original images, Adversarial variants raise median localization error from 282 km to 1,347 km, a 4.8-fold increase. Among geocodable adversarial samples, 6.5-20.1% of predictions lie less than 50 km from the injected target across models, and every evaluated model exhibits a positive mean paired reduction in target distance from Blank to Adversarial. Compatible, unrelated, and conflicting text replacements produce distinct effects on model predictions, while clean-input localization performance does not fully predict robustness to conflicting text. These results establish visual geolocation as a continuous diagnostic of scene-text arbitration and provide a controlled framework for evaluating how MLLMs resolve conflicting multimodal evidence.

Sirun Li, Minghao Liu, Ling Dai +4

Peking University, Beijing, China · 22077AI · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China

VLM Robustness Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.CV

GEB-Bench: Abstract Structures Told in Many Voices

Can a model look at a river delta and a lightning bolt and see that they share a structure? We introduce GEB-Bench, a benchmark whose unit is an abstract structural motif--self-reference, a strange loop, a Mobius twist--in the spirit of Godel, Escher, Bach. Each motif is told in several voices: a natural scene whose composition is the structure, a folk story whose telling enacts it through a mechanically checkable form device, a mathematical theorem, and a programmatic skeleton; surface parameters are declared nuisance variables and never scored. Motifs, voices, and the structural changes between them form a small cross-modal category, and GEB-Bench's tasks are its questions. Evaluating twelve open and proprietary models, we find that abstraction failure is lawful. The central finding is a gap between recognition and cross-voice mapping: models identify a structure within one voice far better than they carry it across voices; every model pays this tax, and mapping strong enough to narrow it appears only at the frontier tier. Two patterns support it. Errors align more strongly with the designed formal geometry than with measured perceptual geometries, and frontier models from different vendors converge on the same wrong answers; and surface complexity taxes every model that reads structure, with capacity buying headroom rather than immunity. GEB-Bench is fully generative and released with its pipeline.

Tong Zhang, Zhiyuan Shi, Yun Peng +1

Fudan University · Peking University

Analogical Reasoning Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.CV

Geo-Embed: Towards Unified Multimodal Embeddings for Urban Understanding

Geospatial and urban applications increasingly require models to compare heterogeneous evidence across street-view imagery, remote-sensing observations, text descriptions, region proposals, and temporal change cues. However, existing multimodal embedding models and benchmarks are still largely designed and evaluated around general-purpose image-text matching, leaving unclear whether unified embedding space can support heterogeneous geospatial tasks involving spatial relationships, fine-grained semantics, and temporal changes. To address this gap, we make three key contributions. First, we introduce GeoMEB, a large-scale multimodal embedding benchmark that standardizes 45 urban evaluation tasks across retrieval, visual question answering, change detection, classification, and visual grounding, together with training collections comprising 1.32M examples and 286K evaluation queries. Second, we present Geo-Embed, a unified embedding model that adapts a shared vision-language backbone to instruction-conditioned query-target matching over heterogeneous geospatial inputs, including single images, multiple images, text, regions, and masks. On GeoMEB, Geo-Embed achieves the strongest overall performance among representative multimodal embedders, with a 15.3% relative improvement over the strongest baseline. These results motivate future geospatial embedders that organize training and evaluation around explicit query-target relations, including semantic, cross-view, region-level, and temporal correspondence.

Jiapeng Li, Yong Li, Junjie Zhou +2

1Peking University · 2Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

Geospatial Representation Learning Cross-Modal Retrieval Vision-Language Grounding Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.AI

KnowHal: A Knowledge-Driven Benchmark for Comprehensive Multimodal Hallucination Evaluation

Hallucination remains a critical challenge for developing trustworthy Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). While existing benchmarks mainly focus on entity, attribute, and relation hallucinations, knowledge-related failures are often investigated separately, lacking a unified evaluation framework across different hallucination dimensions. To overcome this, we propose \textbf{KnowHal}, a benchmark that explicitly incorporates knowledge hallucination into multimodal hallucination evaluation spanning four dimensions: entity, attribute, relation, and knowledge. KnowHal constructs paired positive and negative questions over shared images and entities, enabling controlled comparisons among perceptual errors, knowledge-related errors, and false-premise acceptance. The benchmark contains 1,800 samples across 10 domains and 50 categories, constructed through a semi-automated pipeline combining LLM assistance, CLIP-based filtering, and human verification. We evaluate 14 representative MLLMs on KnowHal and conduct extensive analyses. Results show that the knowledge dimension consistently presents the greatest challenge for nearly all evaluated models, while most models exhibit substantial performance degradation on negative questions, revealing limited robustness to false premises. By unifying four hallucination dimensions with paired question design, KnowHal addresses an important gap in existing evaluation frameworks and enables a more comprehensive assessment of hallucinations in MLLMs.

Ruihan Li, Jiyang Tan, Kailin Jiang +5

1C-FAIR & School of software, Shandong University · University of Science and Technology of China · 3Jiangnan University

Multimodal Hallucination Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.SE

Pattern over Pixels: Measuring Pattern Completion Bias in Multimodal Code Generation

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to translate webpage screenshots into front-end code, but repeated UI patterns may sway them toward visually incorrect yet pattern-consistent outputs. In this work, we test how repeated webpage patterns hurt MLLM accuracy on an objective screenshot-to-code fill-in-the-blank task. We introduce the first benchmark for visual pattern-completion bias, where one localized element in a repeated UI pattern is perturbed and the model must recover the masked width or font-size value from the screenshot and HTML context. Starting from 30 webpages curated from the Design2Code dataset, we build 1,440 evaluated screenshots spanning structural card and text-style patterns under standard and noise-overlaid conditions. We evaluate five frontier MLLMs and find that all are strongly biased toward the repeated baseline. Mean bias rate reaches 69.78% on card-width perturbations and 80.22% on text font-size perturbations, while mean accuracy is only 21.17% and 7.89%, respectively. Codex-5.3 performs best but still drops from 68.61% accuracy on cards to 13.89% on text, while Flash-3.0 reaches 96.11% bias on text. Noise, subtler perturbations, and boundary positions further increase bias rate. Reasoning analysis further shows that greater reasoning effort correlates with lower bias, yet qualitative evidence reveals that models can identify the anomalous element and still override it with the pattern-consistent answer. Our results identify a concrete failure mode in multimodal code generation and show that its severity is strongly associated with visual saliency

Khai-Nguyen Nguyen, Oscar Chaparro, Antonio Mastropaolo

William & Mary Williamsburg, USA · University of Virginia

Code Generation Multimodal Large Language Models Inductive Bias Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.AI

ChartAnno: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Chart Annotation Generation

Annotations are essential to communicative visualization, helping explain data, emphasize key findings, and guide attention. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer new opportunities for automatic chart annotation authoring, their capabilities in this task remain underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce ChartAnno, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on chart annotation generation. ChartAnno contains 1,200 real-world charts with paired annotated and unannotated executable code, along with 3,600 annotation instructions spanning three levels of specificity. We also develop a multidimensional evaluation framework combining rule-based and LLM-judged metrics to assess execution, structural compliance, semantic consistency, and design effectiveness. We evaluate 10 representative MLLMs under two primary chart input settings: (1) chart code alone and (2) both code and chart image. Results reveal that proprietary models lead overall, though open-source models narrow the gap. While higher instruction specificity improves annotation quality, inferring abstract communicative intent remains difficult across all models. Providing chart images yields marginal benefit when code is available. We also examine the effect of chart code through an image-only ablation and analyze the effects of multiple task complexity indicators and instruction-level transitions. Further analyses characterize common failure modes and validate the reliability of the LLM-based judge. Experiments with D3 and SVG demonstrate the generalizability of ChartAnno beyond its primary Python setting.

Zhenghan Chen, Zekai Shao, Lidan Tan +10

Fudan University · Sun Yat-sen University · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) +1

Data Visualization Multimodal Large Language Models Chart Understanding Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.CL

ArtECulture: Benchmarking Culture-Conditioned Visual Emotion Understanding in Multimodal Large Language Models

Existing visual emotion understanding methods typically ignore cultural variations in emotional perception. We introduce culture-conditioned visual emotion understanding, a task that predicts the culture-specific emotional perception of a given image and explains the underlying rationale. Although related benchmarks exist, they are limited by inconsistent individual annotations, which hinder the derivation of majority-supported culture-level emotion labels, and imbalanced cultural coverage. Thus, we present ArtECulture, a benchmark containing 6,792 artworks with culture-specific emotion labels and explanations across English, Chinese, and Arabic cultures, with balanced Western and non-Western content. Evaluations of 16 open- and closed-source Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) under a zero-shot setting reveal that the task remains challenging, with the best model achieving below 50% accuracy. To address this limitation, we introduce a retrieval-augmented culture-conditioned emotion understanding framework, which leverages a concept-based cultural emotion knowledge base to inject explicit cultural knowledge into MLLMs without additional training. The framework improves both culturally aligned emotion prediction and grounded explanation generation. Our benchmark and code will be publicly released.

Xiaolin Chen, Xuemeng Song, Wenhao Shi +3

National University of Singapore · Southern University of Science and Technology · Nanyang Technological University

Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Emotion Recognition Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 4, 2026cs.CV

LDU-Bench: Multimodal LLM Evaluation for Lithography Defect Understanding under Layout-Varying Circuit Backgrounds

Multimodal large language models have demonstrated strong defect recognition capability in industrial anomaly detection. However, in lithography review, merely determining whether an image contains a defect is insufficient for engineering inspection; models must also understand defect morphology, spatial location, and the potential causes supported by visible evidence. To this end, this paper proposes LDU-Bench, a multi-task multimodal benchmark for lithography defect understanding. Constructed from real lithography and integrated-circuit review images, LDU-Bench decomposes the review workflow into four independent tasks: defect triage, morphology recognition, coarse localization, and image-conditioned cause analysis. It systematically evaluates models using task-level metrics, diagnostic readouts, and the Lithography Closure Score (LCS). Experimental results show that although existing MLLMs can perform defect triage relatively reliably, this ability does not stably transfer to downstream review stages. Morphology alignment, effective localization, and evidence-to-cause mapping remain the major bottlenecks. Further diagnostics indicate that this capability break is not a fluctuation of a single metric, but reflects insufficient structured understanding across semantic levels. Overall, LDU-Bench provides a quantifiable and diagnostic unified platform for evaluating the usability, failure points, and capability boundaries of industrial MLLMs in lithography review chains.

Huanglong Ji, Botong Zhao, Shujing Lv +1

Semiconductor Manufacturing Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Anomaly Detection Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 3, 2026cs.CV

MIEScore: Human-Aligned Evaluation for Multi-Source Image Editing

Recent advances in unified multimodal models have significantly improved text-guided image editing abilities. In particular, models such as Nano-Banana-Pro and GPT-Image-2 demonstrate emerging capabilities in multi-source image editing (MIE), including tasks such as object synthesis, person-background composition, and cross-image style fusion. However, existing benchmarks and image editing assessment (IEQA) methods remain primarily focused on single-image editing tasks and largely overlook the more challenging setting of MIE. This highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive and human-aligned benchmark for MIE. To this end, we introduce MIE-Bench, the first large-scale multiple image editing benchmark with fine-grained human preference annotations. Specifically, MIE-Bench includes 3,000 editing instances across 16 tasks, each involving more than two source images and an editing prompt, together with 36K edited images produced by 12 state-of-the-art editing models and over 108K mean opinion scores (MOSs) covering visual quality, instruction following, and attribute preservation. Based on MIE-Bench, we propose MIEScore, a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based evaluation model enhanced with skill optimization and multi-dimensional supervised fine-tuning, to provide human-aligned feedback for MIE. Extensive experiments show that MIEScore achieves state-of-the-art performance in aligning with human preferences and generalizes well across other IEQA datasets. Both the dataset and the model are available at https://github.com/IntMeGroup/MIEScore.

Zitong Xu, Huiyu Duan, Xinyun Zhang +7

Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd · University of Electronic and Science Technology of China

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 3, 2026cs.CV

SVGEval: A Vision-Grounded Framework for Perceptual-Quality Benchmarking and Evaluation in Text-to-SVG Generation

Multimodal large models are increasingly used to generate scalable vector graphics (SVG), but reliable evaluation remains underexplored. Existing protocols are often code-centric or borrow raster-image metrics after rendering SVGs, which fail to reflect human perception and overlook SVG-specific qualities such as geometry and spatial composition. We introduce SVGEval, a vision-grounded multimodal benchmark for human-aligned SVG quality assessment. SVGEval explicitly incorporates visual renderings to evaluate whether models can judge the rendered outcome rather than only inspect SVG code, and provides high-quality annotations obtained via multi-round human labeling with expert refinement. Systematic evaluations across representative multimodal models reveal a clear gap: models perform relatively well on semantic alignment and aesthetics, yet struggle on geometry- and layout-related judgments. Building on SVGEval, we train an explainable SVG quality scorer that outputs multi-aspect scores with textual rationales. Ablations show that explicit visual grounding and reasoning supervision are crucial, especially for spatial and geometric assessment. SVGEval offers a reliable testbed and practical scorer for evaluating and improving SVG generation in the era of multimodal models.

Yiming Wang, Ye Chen, Hanqi Chen +1

School of Integrated Circuits (School of Information Science and Electronic Engineering), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China · Zhiyuan College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China · Guangdong Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy (SZ), Shenzhen 518107, China

Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 3, 2026cs.CV

Decoupling semantics from vision: A framework for faithful visual-text compression evaluation

Recent visual-text compression (VTC) methods, typified by DeepSeek-OCR, report impressive high token compression ratios for long-context modeling tasks by leveraging text-to-image rendering. However, existing evaluation protocols heavily rely on downstream task performance. Such evaluation metrics fail to accurately measure text preservation due to the strong inherent linguistic priors of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). In this work, we introduce a new evaluation framework that decouples MLLMs' capabilities to faithfully assess VTC quality. Within this framework, we further introduce the ZeroSense Benchmark to ensure low semantic correlation of testing samples. By eliminating textual dependencies, our benchmark guarantees that the evaluation results are purely reflective of VTC quality, unaffected by the semantic inference capabilities of downstream models. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that VTC quality and downstream task accuracy diverge significantly, highlighting the necessity of our decoupled evaluation framework.

Yonghan Gao, Zehong Chen, Lijian Xu +3

Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology · Shenzhen Technology University

Multimodal Model Evaluation Visual Token Compression

Aug 2, 2026cs.AI

Loud or Silent? A Reusable Framework for Per-Modality Failure Analysis in Multimodal Clinical AI

Multimodal clinical models are usually judged on accuracy with every modality present, but deployment removes modalities; an echocardiogram is often unavailable where an ECG is routine. Two questions then matter beyond the size of the accuracy loss: which modality was responsible, and whether the model fails loudly or silently once that modality is dropped. The distinction is per-example and modality-level, and is separate from post-hoc feature attribution (e.g. SHAP). Models are replaced often; the evaluation that answers these questions is reused. We present a model-agnostic modality-failure framework: given N modality embeddings, any mask-aware probe, and labels, it returns a per-example failure taxonomy, a per-modality complementarity matrix that attributes error to modalities, and a loud-vs-silent dropout profile separating monitorable failures from those that pass unflagged far from the decision boundary, using only deployment-observable signals. We release it as a small, unit-tested harness and validate it against planted ground truth. Across seeds it recovers that planted modality dominance and complementary subset, reports per-modality loud-vs-silent rates, and scales to a three-modality complementarity matrix; because the planted structure is known by construction, this validates recovery of per-example attribution rather than clinical performance. We then instantiate the framework on frozen EchoJEPA and HuBERT-ECG embeddings for LVEF and the EF <= 40% HFrEF gate over a paired MIMIC-IV cohort, where on the held-out test split (n = 245) dropping echo nearly doubles error. The narrow echo-to-ECG overlap that bounds cohort size is itself a deployment finding for cardiac foundation models. All of our work can be found at https://github.com/criticaldata/PRIMED-AI.

Quang Bui, Shlok Jaiswal, Samuel Paik-Heintz +14

Missing-Modality Learning Multimodal Robustness Healthcare Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 2, 2026cs.CL

LongChart VQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for MLLMs with Complex Multi-Chart Reasoning

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are rapidly evolving with expanded context windows and stronger reasoning capabilities, enabling multi-chart understanding and multi-step inference. These abilities are increasingly important as MLLMs are adopted in complex agentic tasks. However, existing benchmarks largely emphasize single-chart perception, while simple chart-to-chart connections are insufficient to evaluate these capabilities. To capture multi-chart complexity while ensuring consistency and validity, we design a synthesis pipeline supported by latent graphs. Building on this pipeline, we introduce LongChart, a benchmark whose VQA sets contain an average of 6.5 images and 31.2 questions. We evaluate 10 state-of-the-art MLLMs and examine three factors that influence performance: reasoning patterns, auxiliary tools, and robustness to image perturbations. Our results show that MLLM accuracy decreases and varies substantially as computational complexity increases, highlighting directions for future research in multi-chart reasoning.

Ziyan Xiao, Yinghao Zhu, Wenting Zhang +2

The University of Hong Kong

Data Visualization Visual Reasoning Chart QA Multimodal QA Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 1, 2026cs.AI

Where did the ambiguity go? Examining how multimodal models interpret polysemous words

Human language is highly polysemous. Many common words (e.g., 'bank' or 'palm') carry several distinct meanings that shape what humans communicate and imagine. Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to understand this multiplicity of meaning, but much less is known about how polysemy surfaces in other modalities such as images. We study this across 17 text-to-image and 15 text-generation models by giving each a polysemous word with no context to fix its meaning and measuring which senses are produced over many samples. We find a clear multimodal gap, where within every model family, generated images settle on far fewer senses than generated sentences (normalized entropy 0.10 vs. 0.25), and both are far less varied than what people imagine for the same words (normalized entropy 0.47). However, when we instead ask a model to list how often it would generate outputs corresponding to each possible meaning of a word, it predicts distributions that are more diverse than the actual space of outputs. These results reveal a multimodal gap in how foundation models express meaning, and how their understanding may not transfer faithfully nor equally across modalities.

Jasin Cekinmez, Addison J. Wu, Raja Marjieh +1

Princeton University

Multimodal Generation Modality Gap in VLMs Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Jul 31, 2026cs.CL

FriendBench: Benchmarking Dyadic Familiarity Inference in Humans and Multimodal Large Language Models

Reading a social situation often depends on behavior, not words alone. We introduce FriendBench, a benchmark for inferring whether two people are already familiar or are meeting as strangers, from a 20-second clip of a dyadic ice-breaker conversation. Every pair answers the same type of prompt, so only the manner of interaction can reveal the answer. Across text, audio, and video, we compare 26 models from seven companies against matched human panels over 96 balanced dyads. The best model and the human crowd are statistically indistinguishable on accuracy in every modality, but reach it differently: humans stay balanced across the two answers, while the strongest models favor ``stranger.'' This is a difference in effective prior, not in discrimination. Richer channels help both unequally, and only humans gain from visible behavior on top of speech. We release the stimuli, human ratings, and model predictions.

Jeffrey M. Girard, Jason Z. Zheng, Jacqueline R. Vertino +2

Fluid Concepts Research

Classification Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Jul 30, 2026cs.LG

LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger

Multimodal agents for visual question answering increasingly operate as multi-step trajectories that interleave perception, retrieval, and reasoning, yet evaluation still largely reduces to final-answer accuracy. This aggregate signal cannot tell whether a correct answer was reached through grounded evidence, language priors, or accidental error cancellation. We propose to treat a multimodal agent trajectory as a provenance-constrained state machine: tool outputs are normalized into a Structured Evidence Ledger that serves as the trajectory state, downstream reasoning and decision claims may cite only active ledger entries, grounding is checked at the entity and numeric level, and repair is realized as typed state transitions that cannot introduce content without tool-produced provenance. We instantiate this design as LedgerMind (Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger), augmented by a Three-Layer Grounding Protocol, an Adaptive Dual-Path Dispatcher that matches reasoning depth to question complexity, and an Event-Triggered Verification-and-Repair engine with a formal provenance non-amplification guarantee. We use LedgerMind to target four recurring failure patterns that final-answer accuracy tends to obscure: unsupported intermediate reasoning, citation-backed entity hallucination (Phantom Grounding), over-reasoning on simple queries, and repair-time amplification. Experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks and backbone MLLMs show that LedgerMind improves both answer accuracy and trajectory-level faithfulness.

Enjun Du, Hange Zhou, Chenxu Du +4

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · The University of Hong Kong · Tsinghua University +1

Multimodal Grounding Multimodal QA Multimodal Agents Multimodal Model Evaluation