Question Answering

Also known as QA

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

23 papers in the last four weeks, up 28% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 165

Oct 8, 2026cs.AI

RIT-RAG: Navigating Document Corpora with Retrieval-Induced Trees

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds language models in external corpora. Agentic RAG enables iterative search, yet exposes the model to isolated chunks without document structure, making it difficult to distinguish relevant evidence from chunks that merely resemble the query. Structure-aware methods such as PageIndex navigate document structure but cannot scale to the structures of large corpora, which do not fit in the LLM context. Hence, they first commit to a single document using a document retriever and cannot recover from a wrong choice. We propose RIT-RAG (Retrieval-Induced Tree RAG), which combines content retrieval with structural navigation. Offline, RIT-RAG builds a tree for each document from its table of contents or sitemap. At query time, it retrieves a broad set of chunks and uses their positions to induce manageable sub-trees, potentially across multiple documents. An LLM agent navigates these sub-trees, selectively reads promising nodes, and reformulates queries when needed. Thus, retrieval proposes where to look, while the agent decides what to read. Across financial, scientific, and customer-support benchmarks, RIT-RAG achieves the highest answer accuracy among vanilla, graph-based, and agentic baselines. On EntQABench, our new benchmark of 2.84 million technical-documentation webpages, it improves accuracy by 6.8 to 11.4 points over the strongest baseline across three LLMs.

Meghanadh Pulivarthi, Swaraj Kumar Biswal, Kushagra Bhushan +3

IBM · IIT Kharagpur

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agentic RAG Question Answering

Oct 7, 2026cs.CL

Right Number, Wrong State? Measuring Cross-Jurisdiction Substitution in LLM Recall of State Policy

When an LLM answers a state-specific policy question wrongly, it may be hallucinating, or it may be returning a real value that holds in another state. We test this with a minimal-set design: the question wording is fixed and only the jurisdiction varies, across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia (51 jurisdictions) and three exactly defined Medicaid income-eligibility quantities. Gold values come from an official data book and agree with an independent source in 101 of 102 checked cells. Under a pre-registered protocol, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol reproducibly give another state's current value, identical across two independent repeats, for 10 and 25 of 153 items. Attribution is fragile, however. Crediting any wrong answer that equals another state's value yields 3-5x more reproducible substitutions than checking every number in the asked state's own records, because many apparent cross-state answers are the asked state's own values under another convention or from an earlier year. Claims about cross-jurisdiction error need a complete same-state reference set. We will release the protocol, gold table, and all model outputs.

Jiayu Feng

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

LLM Reliability Question Answering

Oct 5, 2026cs.CL

Ontology Concept Overlap as a Training Signal: Knowledge-Grounded Reinforcement Learning for Clinical Question Answering

Reinforcement learning post-training for language models relies on two reward designs: human preferences (RLHF, DPO) and binary verifiers (RLVR). Clinical question answering fits neither. Near-correct answers differ by a single substituted entity, and no executable check decides clinical correctness. We instantiate a soft verifier from a maintained controlled vocabulary: UMLS Concept Unique Identifier overlap (via scispaCy, set-level F1) gives a graded, externally specified reward computed without a model in the loop. We combine it inside GRPO with an entropy-normalised LLM judge, which covers the safety and evidence axes overlap cannot see, and a small consistency penalty on padding and repetition that keeps early-training samples scorable. This three-term composite improves over SFT on Phi-3-mini (3.8B) over MedQA by 2.9% on EM (0.700 vs 0.680) and 39% on Token-F1 (0.202 vs 0.145); on Llama-3.2-3B the corresponding gains are 14% on EM and 35% on Token-F1. We report Token-F1 as the primary metric because it credits partially-correct clinical content that EM discards at this open-generation scale. Main-table results are means over 3 seeds with standard deviations below 0.005. The method transfers to PubMedQA, where training on the PubMedQA train set with the same composite reward improves Token-F1 over SFT by 22% on Phi-3-mini and 17% on Llama-3.2-3B without retuning. A reward ablation on Phi-3, varying the judge-ontology split at a fixed consistency weight, attributes 3 EM points to the ontology term, the contribution that catches entity substitutions the judge cannot. Three negative findings constrain the design: DPO under random negatives underperforms SFT for strong-prior models but helps the weakest-prior one; PPO under a sparse neural reward diverges; GRPO with KL-in-loss collapses at 7B.

Aditya Tanna, Abhishek Jindal

Dhirubhai Ambani University Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Reward Modeling RL for Language Model Reasoning Question Answering Clinical QA Medical LLMs

Oct 1, 2026cs.CL

Mem++: Non-Destructive Memory for Long-Term Organizational LLM Agents

Large Language Model (LLM) agents now take part in organizational work, where many authors record decisions across documents over months. Because a revised decision arrives as a new document rather than an edit, answering a question requires knowing which version held at a given time. However, most memory systems compress the record at write time. By distilling each document into facts, notes or graph edges, these methods fix what can be answered before any question is asked. To address this, we propose Mem++, a non-destructive memory framework shifting from write-time distillation to read-time selection. Mem++ stores every document whole with its date and author, and it calls no generative model at write time. At read time, it retrieves only documents dated up to the time a question asks about and fuses lexical and semantic rankings. Unlike systems that overwrite older versions, Mem++ keeps them and leaves the choice to the answering model. Evaluations on the organizational benchmark OrgMemBench demonstrate that Mem++ surpasses the strongest memory system baseline by 8.0 to 13.1 points across two answering models. With gpt-4.1-mini, it also achieves the best overall score, 2.6 points above RAG. In addition, Mem++ achieves the best average LLM-judge score on LoCoMo and ranks second on LongMemEval-S, behind only its entity-graph variant. Code for benchmark evaluation is available at https://github.com/AIDAChip-Inc/mem-plus-plus.

Ahmad Yehia, Aly O. Abdelkareem, Islam Ahmed +4

The University of Texas at Austin · AIDAChip Inc.

LLM Agent Memory Persistent Memory for Language Models Question Answering Agent Memory Management Temporal QA

Oct 1, 2026cs.CL

Distilling Directional Verification

Knowledge distillation aims to transfer the factual knowledge of large language models to smaller models for efficient deployment. Yet a teacher may recall a relation in one direction while failing to generate the answer in the reverse direction. Distillation from its generated answers can therefore propagate this directional limitation to the student. The same teacher can nevertheless recognize such an answer by scoring the relation in the direction it knows. We introduce directional label distillation, in which frozen teachers score candidate answers in that known direction and the best-scoring candidate becomes the student's training target. On facts about parents and their children, known-direction scoring yields more accurate labels than scoring the requested direction, even after tuned corrections for name priors. With prior-corrected scores, the better direction depends on the facts rather than the template, and reverses on mined facts whose notable entity is the parent rather than the child. With the evaluated children's forward facts withheld, students trained on known-direction labels improve open-ended accuracy on their trained queries by 13 to 15 points over students trained on prior-corrected reverse labels. After generated answers are matched to a fixed name list by lexical similarity, students reproduce nearly all selected labels. Their accuracy largely follows label quality. The label advantage holds on unscreened queries and when candidates are retrieved without inserting correct answers. Our findings show that directional verification mitigates the transfer of errors from teacher-generated answers to students by providing more accurate training targets. Code is available at https://github.com/js-lee-AI/directional-verification.

Jungseob Lee, Sugyeong Eo, Seongtae Hong +4

Korea University · Yonsei University Mirae Campus · Soongsil University +1

Question Answering Language Model Distillation Factual Knowledge in Language Models Knowledge Distillation

Sep 30, 2026cs.CL

SEPAL: Separated Expert Pairs with Answer-Level Fusion for Reliable LLM Collaboration

Multi-agent collaboration lets large language models (LLMs) improve question answering through deliberation and feedback. Yet shared discussion couples correction with exposure to the same mistakes, which can erode the diversity needed for voting. Self-consistency offers sampling diversity without feedback, while single-pair Actor-Critic collaboration refines only one candidate. We introduce SEPAL, which assigns three private Actor-Critic teams to direct reasoning, evidence grounding, and verification. Role-specific training gives the teams different reasoning objectives beyond sampling variation. Each Critic guides revisions within its own team, preventing feedback from carrying errors across candidates. Once revision ends, majority voting combines only the final answers, keeping the reasoning histories separate until the decision. Across five open-weight backbones and five question-answering benchmarks, SEPAL improves mean accuracy by 1.81 percentage points over a matched single Actor-Critic pair, with improvements across all five backbones. Code is available at https://github.com/zhansan114514/SEPAL.

Weijie Ren, Yanwen Zhang, Hao Li +3

Zhejiang University · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · University of Science and Technology of China

Multi-Agent LLM Systems Question Answering Multi-Agent Collaboration LLM Agent Reliability

Sep 30, 2026cs.CV

When Can Text Replace Vision? Structural Bottlenecks in Diagram Reasoning

Can structured text replace vision for diagram reasoning? A wrong answer after textualization can arise because the representation omits information the question needs, or because the solver fails to use information that is present. We introduce a diagnostic protocol to distinguish these explanations. Using the same solver model and generation settings, we compare three input conditions: the original image, question-blind structure extracted by a vision-language model, or gold structure derived from the diagram source. Validity-triggered recovery tests truncation and schema failure, question-relevant fidelity measures preservation of answer-critical structure, and matched edge interventions test the effect of error location. On a reserved holdout of 240 public FlowGen diagrams, evaluated under a frozen protocol, gold structure reaches 87% accuracy while direct vision and learned text both remain below 30%. The aggregate comparison includes source-derived relation labels that may not be printed in the image and uses different learned and gold graph encodings, so it does not isolate extraction error alone. Retrying only invalid extractions makes nearly every public representation schema-valid yet leaves accuracy essentially unchanged. The public learned-text deficit relative to gold more than doubles with structural difficulty. Question-relevant topology predicts correctness better than whole-graph topology. In an exposed intervention study, a single answer-relevant edge edit reduces the primary solver's original-answer accuracy to near zero, while matched irrelevant edits largely preserve it. Supplied structure requires fewer solving tokens than vision, but learned acquisition removes this advantage at single use. These comparisons motivate evaluating acquired text by the answer-relevant evidence it preserves and by the solver's ability to use that representation.

Yunbei Zhang, Janet Wang, Jihun Hamm +1

Tulane University · Virginia Tech

Visual Reasoning Question Answering VLM Reasoning Graph Reasoning

Sep 29, 2026cs.CV

Beyond the Timeline: Augmenting Long-Video Memory with Grounded Entity Biographies

Answering questions about long videos often requires connecting events involving the same objects across hours or days. Chronological descriptions and text-derived entities can leave physical identity unresolved: different objects may share a description, while observations of the same object remain disconnected across events. Retrieving relevant events therefore does not necessarily recover the "biography" of the particular entity a question concerns. To address this, we introduce Grounded Entity Biographies (GEB), a long-video memory framework that groups visually grounded observations of the same physical instance across clips into retrievable biographies while preserving the context of each moment. During question answering, the biography is retrieved alongside episodic evidence, allowing the model to follow an entity through events using identity links established during memory construction. Evaluations across four benchmarks, including day-long and week-long recordings, demonstrate improvements over prior memory frameworks in both multiple-choice and open-ended question answering. On EgoLifeQA, GEB achieves 72.0% accuracy, 4.4 percentage points above the best published result. Ablations show that grounded identity association and biography reading both contribute to the gains, which additional descriptions alone do not fully recover.

Hui Ren, Lei Fan, Henry Pao +5

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · Amazon.com, Inc.

Multimodal Memory Question Answering Long-Video QA Temporal QA

Sep 29, 2026cs.CL

Learning to Retrieve Missing Evidence for Long-Term Memory QA

Long-term memory enables language models to use past interactions in future conversations. However, evidence needed to answer a question may be scattered across distant turns, while the question itself omits clues needed to locate it. Retrieved facts can reveal these clues, motivating retrieval decisions conditioned on evidence already found. We introduce MERA (Missing-Evidence Retrieval Augmentation), which separates globally searchable memory from a question-specific evidence state. Verified evidence guides subsequent retrieval without restricting access to the global memory. We train a lightweight planner through reinforcement learning, rewarding queries that recover previously missing evidence. MERA achieves strong answer accuracy across Qwen3-30B and GPT-4o-mini backbones. With Qwen3-30B for evidence processing and answer generation, the trained 0.6B planner achieves 77.40% accuracy on LoCoMo and 71.29% on LongMemEval-S, exceeding a 30B planner without retrieval-grounded training by 4.10% and 3.96%, respectively. On LoCoMo, later retrieval rounds increase cumulative evidence recall from 55.5% to 80.5%.

Yi-Xuan Deng, Yi Zhang, Wei Liu +2

Tsinghua University

Persistent Memory for Language Models Question Answering RL for IR Long-Term Conversational Memory Evidence Retrieval

Sep 28, 2026cs.RO

Memory in the Sky: Low-Altitude Question Answering with Multi-Agent Memory Aggregation

This paper studies low-altitude question answering (LAQA), in which distributed unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) memories are aggregated at a ground server to answer questions about observations over a long horizon. Unlike conventional resource allocation based on sensing, communication, control, or computation metrics, LAQA requires an explicit measure of memory value. We propose a generative adversarial exam (GAE) that uses forward simulation to evaluate memory retrieval and exam scores to quantify memory quality. This enables the downstream QA value of candidate memories to be measured and optimized without accessing the internal mechanisms of the black-box captioning, retrieval, and reasoning pipeline. Building on this metric, we develop a memory-centric (MemCen) framework that jointly selects UAVs and allocates transmit power to maximize memory quality under communication constraints. In the noise-limited regime, we derive a QoM-aware capped water-filling law that explicitly connects task utility with physical-layer power allocation. We further develop penalty successive optimization (PSO) and learning to memorize (L2M) solvers. MemCen achieves QA accuracies of 92.4% and 84.0% in CARLA Town04 and Town05 under static and dynamic communication conditions, respectively. In real-world experiments, MemCen achieves 88.5% QA accuracy on the panoramic multi-agent system (PMAS) benchmark. Finally, UAV-to-robot-dog demonstrations further validate the practical utility of the acquired memories for environmental understanding and navigation.

Chengyang Li, Yujie Wan, Shuai Wang +6

The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China · Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China · Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China +2

Question Answering Multi-Agent Systems Wireless Resource Allocation Agent Memory Management

Sep 28, 2026cs.CL

Rubric-Aware On-Policy Self-Distillation for LLM Personalization

LLM personalization aims to generate responses aligned with individual users' preferences and needs. User-specific rubrics make these expectations explicit, providing direct supervision on what a satisfactory answer should cover. Existing rubric-guided approaches, however, exploit such guidance only at a coarse granularity, either by using rubrics to supervise the prediction of relevant aspects for subsequent generation or by reducing aspect coverage to a single response-level reward for reinforcement learning. This leaves a gap between specifying what a personalized answer should contain and teaching the model how to generate it. To bridge this gap, we propose GRASP, a rubric-aware on-policy self-distillation framework for LLM personalization that turns user-specific rubric aspects into fine-grained, token-level supervision. Specifically, GRASP pairs a rubric-free student with a rubric-informed teacher that additionally receives the target user-specific rubrics. By aligning their next-token distributions along on-policy trajectories generated by the student, GRASP transfers the teacher's rubric-conditioned guidance into the student, translating user-specific semantic requirements into dense token-level supervision. Since rubric-informed teachers can still produce inadequate supervision, we further introduce Rubric-based Teacher Validation (RTV), which retains only instances where the teacher sufficiently covers the target aspects, improving both supervision quality and training efficiency. Experiments on the LaMP-QA benchmark for personalized question answering demonstrate that GRASP achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple backbones, supporting the effectiveness of rubric-guided token-level supervision for personalization. To ensure reproducibility, our code is available at https://github.com/SnowCharmQ/GRASP.

Yilun Qiu, Xiaoyan Zhao, Chengbing Wang +6

Xiaohongshu Inc. · National University of Singapore · University of Science and Technology of China +1

LLM Personalization On-Policy Self-Distillation Question Answering Rubric-Guided Generation

Sep 24, 2026cs.AI

EnigmaForge: The Question Is Hidden in the Story

Most benchmarks hand the model a question. EnigmaForge hands it a stack of old documents and no question at all. Buried in the letters, receipts, and logbook margins is a small logic puzzle whose solution is unique - proved by a SAT solver at generation time, with an ablation certificate showing every clue is load-bearing. Because instances are generated rather than collected, the corpus renews forever. The headline measure is intuition: task success when handed only the story, with world reconstruction as the secondary axis. Twenty-five frontier models ran over 600 instances (17,400 scored records) under three matched conditions. Intuition reshuffles the leaderboard: a 22x spread where fact recovery spans 1.6x, the second-best fact-recoverer ranks fourteenth, one model is indifferent to being told the question, and another is significantly better without it. Several models were blocked by their own content filters before reaching the puzzle - any benchmark scoring refusals as failure is quietly measuring filter behavior.

Daniel Eisner

Question Answering Synthetic Benchmark Generation LLM Reasoning

Sep 24, 2026cs.CL

ChunkRank: Model-Aware Text Chunking and Abstention-Aware Answer Selection for LLM Pipelines

We present ChunkRank, an open-source Python library that derives chunk boundaries from a target model's tokenizer and context window, and selects an answer among candidates produced independently per chunk. It ships a validated registry of 90 models across 15 providers and six answer-selection methods, and needs only three core dependencies. For chunking, ChunkRank avoids context-window overflow automatically from the model name, whereas character-based splitters overflow or waste the budget, and a fidelity study across 11 languages shows why token-exact budgets matter beyond English. For answer selection we report a negative result: on NaturalQuestions, TriviaQA and HotpotQA, with extractive and generative readers, no content-based ranker reliably beats taking the first non-empty answer. The reason is reader abstention on chunks that lack the answer, not answer position. A long-context baseline shows that chunking matches single-call reading on single-hop questions, so ChunkRank targets small-window and beyond-window settings. Code, registry and evaluation harness are released.

Amit Nautiyal, Ayush Bhatt, Gaurav Nautiyal

Document Chunking Question Answering LLM Abstention

Sep 23, 2026cs.CL

Meet, Compare, or Abstain: LatWeave for Deterministic Multi-Hop Question Answering on Knowledge Lattices

Probabilistic question-answering systems -- whether large language models (LLMs) themselves, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), or trained multi-hop retrievers -- conflate "what is known" and "how to reason" into a single probabilistic computation: hallucination cannot be eradicated, evidence chains cannot be audited, and the system answers even when it does not know. We present LatWeave, which organizes knowledge into a multidimensional knowledge lattice and compiles multi-hop QA into three deterministic operators -- meet (constraint intersection), compare (lattice-order comparison), and abstain (structural abstention); LLMs appear only on the construction side (one-shot extraction) and the query-planning side, while the answer-generation path is zero-LLM, zero-task-training, and auditable end to end -- so that question answering over Web-published knowledge becomes reproducible item by item. Rather than claiming across-the-board SOTA, we characterize the operating envelope of this paradigm on six public benchmarks: when knowledge is complete (MetaQA, 39,093 questions) meet chains are near-lossless over three hops (any-hit 0.9975, on par with fully supervised KBQA); on templated multi-hop home ground (2WikiMultihopQA held-out n=1,258) EM 0.865, well above published structure-augmented RAG reproductions; on open-text deep composition (MuSiQue) and extraction-coverage gaps (HotpotQA) we report degradation honestly and attribute it to causes outside the lattice-algebra layer; and when information is incomplete (IIRC) we achieve structural abstention with abstain accuracy 0.971 and leak rate 0.029. Within the operating envelope, deterministic execution pays no performance penalty, and every step on the answer path can be recomputed -- precisely the source of end-to-end auditability.

Yuze Ren, Shaoheng Fan, Tao Wang +2

ZenSmart Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China

Multi-Hop QA Question Answering Knowledge-Intensive QA LLM Abstention

Sep 17, 2026cs.CL

Intrinsic Sequence-Likelihood Confidence in Retrieval-Dominated Extractive QA: Two Pre-Specified Negatives, and What They Do and Do Not Attribute

In extractive document question answering whose questions were generated from the passages that contain their answers -- so that retrieval recovers 92-99.8% of what any mode combination could reach, whatever its absolute accuracy -- confidence-driven mechanisms have little to gain. Fine-tuning an open language model on a specialized domain corpus yields a model whose own confidence is a tempting control signal: it could decide which queries warrant further adaptation, and which answers to trust. We evaluate both uses under criteria fixed before the runs were executed, across four 7-9B model families whose adaptation moved closed-book F1 by at most +0.03, and both fail: a distillation trigger on all four families, under its pre-specified three-step transfer budget, and a routing-and-abstention policy in its single-model pilot. Retrieval alone recovers 92-99.8% of best-case combined accuracy under every correctness criterion we test, leaving routers no meaningful gain. The sequence-likelihood signal is insufficient relative to that mode -- area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.65-0.81 under the registered criterion -- before adaptation as well as after, unchanged by scalar recalibration and not consistently improved by token-level temperature rescaling. And the finer diagnostics depend on the correctness criterion and on answer length; on the three adapted combinations where we could test it, selector ablations show no statistically detectable downstream benefit from the confidence term on any seed; on Gemma, removing it changes the selector from failing to passing both registered criteria. The usable product is a set of pre-specified negatives with their dependencies made explicit.

Gunwoo Lee, Changmin Sung, Sang-Hwan Gwak +3

Large-scale AI Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), 245 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. · Department of Applied AI, University of Science and Technology (UST), 217 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34113, Republic of Korea.

LLM Evaluation Selective Prediction Confidence Estimation in Language Models Question Answering LLM Reliability LLM Uncertainty Estimation

Sep 17, 2026cs.CL

VākQA: A Benchmark and Evaluation Study for Telugu Spoken Factoid Question Answering

Question answering has advanced rapidly with large language models, but predominantly for high-resource languages, in both text and spoken settings. Spoken question answering (SQA) benchmark for Telugu remains unexplored, and the reliability of automatic evaluation in this setting remains unquantified. We introduce VākQA, a Telugu SQA benchmark of 2,001 factoid question-answer pairs across six domains, with 2.53 hours of speech audio, bilingual transcriptions, and human-verified reference answers. We first validate evaluation methods against human judgements: Gemini-as-a-judge best approximates human ratings but is non-uniformly strict, while open-weight judges systematically penalize correct Telugu answers that differ in surface form from the reference. Using this validated setup, we benchmark proprietary and open-weight models across input modality, language, and domain. We observe that Telugu phrasing retains cultural specificity that is lost in translation, speech input introduces phonetic confusions that alter question meaning, and cascaded ASR-MT errors compound progressively. VākQA is publicly released.

Bhavana Akkiraju, Ravi Sastry Kolluru, Sri Charan D +3

International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, India

Audio QA LLM-as-a-Judge Question Answering Multilingual QA Spoken QA

Sep 16, 2026cs.CL

Less Is More: Graph-free Multimodal RAG via Multi-signal Late Fusion

Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely used for multimodal, cross-document question answering. However, building corpus-level graphs is expensive, slow to query, and difficult to maintain. We present TrioRAG, a graph-free multimodal framework that integrates evidence from three complementary signals: the question, the anchor image, and a VLM-enhanced query generated from both. Each signal retrieves independently over a shared multi-vector index of page text and page images, and the results are combined through late fusion. Further, we introduce AutoQA, a multimodal automotive benchmark whose questions are grounded in noisy, web-sourced images rather than clean document-sourced figures. Its questions require reasoning across manuals. We position it as a model-curated testbed rather than a human-validated gold standard. Across three benchmarks, TrioRAG matches or outperforms graph-based systems while reducing total cost and accelerating per-query inference by 1.6-2.3 times. By construction, AutoQA grounds its questions in out-of-corpus web images. In this setting image retrieval reaches only 19.3% document-level recall, while text-derived signals, especially the VLM-enhanced query, keep retrieval robust.

Tithi Rakshit, Hongkuan Zhou, Lavdim Halilaj +1

University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany · Corporate Research, Robert Bosch GmbH, Renningen, Germany · University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

Multimodal RAG Multimodal IR Question Answering Multimodal QA Multimodal Fusion

Sep 16, 2026cs.CL

Knowledge-Graph Based Augmentation versus Retrieval Augmented Generation for Cultural-Related Question Answering

Large language models (LLMs) suffer from a long-tail deficit: culturally specific facts, particularly those concerning underrepresented regions such as Latin America, appear too rarely in pretraining corpora to be reliably memorized. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by grounding generation in external text, but structured alternatives such as Knowledge Graphs (KGs) offer tighter control over what enters the context, along with potential gains in explainability and updatability. We benchmark Graph-RAG against standard RAG on LatamQA, a culturally grounded multiple-choice dataset spanning eight thematic categories. The graphs are built end-to-end from Wikipedia articles with KGGen, a recent open-domain extractor, without manual curation in our main setting. G-Retriever is competitive with RAG and reduces the error of the base LLM by 72% with a standard KG and 78% with a benchmark-aware variant, the gap to RAG narrowing further as the graph is oriented toward task-relevant content. The trained projection transfers zero-shot to Portuguese without target-language fine-tuning, indicating multilingual reach.

Pablo Poulenard, Yannis Karmim, Valentin Barrière

DCC, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile · École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France · Inria, Almanach, Paris, France +2

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation Question Answering Cultural Knowledge in Language Models

Sep 15, 2026cs.IR

One Size Does Not Fit All! Dynamic Retriever and Generator Selection for RAG

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems typically employ fixed retriever and generator configurations across queries, despite substantial differences in query complexity and information needs, leading to inefficient allocation of computational resources. While retrieval and generation adaptivity have been studied independently, their joint effect on end-to-end RAG performance remains underexplored. We systematically analyze how retriever and generator complexity interacts across factoid and multi-hop question answering (QA), including bridge and composition reasoning tasks. Our analysis shows that stronger retrieval generally yields larger gains than increased generation effort, but both exhibit diminishing and non-monotonic returns, indicating that higher-complexity configurations are not uniformly better across queries. Motivated by these findings, we introduce DRAG, a query-adaptive framework for selecting retriever-generator configurations. We first propose DRAG

_\text{QPP}

, a training-free routing approach that uses Query Performance Prediction (QPP) signals to guide retriever selection and perplexity-based measures over retrieved context to guide generator selection. We further introduce DRAG

_\text{SFT}

, a supervised routing approach that fine-tunes an LLM to jointly predict retriever-generator configurations. Across three LLM families and four QA benchmarks, \qpprag~achieves performance comparable to strong static RAG baselines while substantially reducing inference latency, whereas DRAG

_\text{SFT}

consistently improves effectiveness over static and training-free adaptive baselines. Overall, DRAG demonstrates that jointly adapting retrieval and generation achieves a more favorable effectiveness-efficiency trade-off than static RAG pipelines.

Neeraj Anand, Payel Santra, Partha Basuchowdhuri +2

Media and Data Science Research Lab Adobe Systems, Noida, India · IACS Kolkata, India · University of Glasgow Glasgow, United Kingdom

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Adaptive RAG Question Answering LLM Routing

Sep 15, 2026cs.CL

When Should LLMs Abstain? Chain-of-Self-Questioning for Selective Risk Control

Large language models can produce fluent answers when their factual support is weak. This paper introduces Chain-of-Self-Questioning (CoSQ), a prompt-only framework that makes answer commitment conditional on an explicit assessment of the information required to answer a question. We evaluate three CoSQ variants under seventeen conditions on the 817-item TruthfulQA multiple-choice validation set using eleven open-weight and hosted model families. In the final balanced-option protocol, Grounded-CoSQ at τ=0.90 reduces the mean unconditional wrong-commitment rate from 13.1% under chain-of-thought prompting to 8.9%, a 32.1% relative reduction, while increasing answered accuracy from 86.9% to 89.7% and answering 87.6% of questions. Both improvements hold for all eleven models and at every evaluated threshold. Critical-CoSQ and Adaptive-CoSQ provide neighboring operating points with 88.6% and 86.5% coverage, respectively, while remaining more reliable than the baseline. A secondary Natural Questions Short-Answer evaluation provides convergent open-form evidence. These findings show that self-assessment can support explicit, tunable answer-or-abstain decisions when an unsupported commitment is more costly than referral or review.

Ali Şenol

Department of Computer Engineering, Tarsus University, Tarsus, Türkiye

Selective Prediction LLM Prompting Language Model Self-Assessment Question Answering LLM Uncertainty Estimation LLM Abstention

Sep 14, 2026cs.CL

The Cost of Compression: A Rate-Distortion Limit on Factual Hallucination

Factual hallucination in closed-book question answering is often treated as a coverage problem: a model fails because the relevant fact is absent from its internal memory. This view misses a second source of error. Even when a fact has been observed, finite memory may force it to be stored only approximately. We study this effect through a simple coverage--compression model of factual recall. We consider an unstructured question-answering task with

N

possible queries and

K

possible answers. A learner observes

M

training facts, compresses them into at most

B

bits, and answers uniformly drawn test queries without retrieval. For a uniformly random ground-truth mapping, we prove

\mathcal{E} \geq \frac{M}{N}\delta^\star\!\left(\frac{B}{M}\right) + \left(1-\frac{M}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{K}\right)

, where

\delta^\star(r)

is the inverse rate-distortion function of a uniform

K

-ary source under zero-one loss. The two terms separate compression distortion on observed facts from missing coverage on unobserved facts. The bound gives a compact way to reason about selective memory, forced compression, structure, retrieval, abstention, and long-context organization. We study the predicted signatures with theory-implied simulations and controlled fact-injection probes in modern language models that vary fact load and effective trainable memory. The result is not a complete theory of hallucination, but an information-theoretic account of a separable failure mode: lossy recall of observed facts under finite memory.

Xi Wang, Shijia Xu, Rongfeng Guo

Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China · University of Science and Technology of China, China · Chongqing University, China +1

Memorization in Language Models Hallucination in Language Models LLM Memory Question Answering Factual Knowledge in Language Models

Sep 14, 2026cs.CL

Judging by the Cover: Cleaning LLM Truthfulness Benchmarks to Avoid Surface-Level Feature Leakage

Binary-choice truth benchmarks ask models to choose between a correct and an incorrect answer, but if the two answers differ systematically in surface-level features, models can exceed chance without performing the intended reasoning. We show that this failure mode is detectable and can be exploited by downstream classifiers. In TruthfulQA, a simple six-feature logistic classifier achieves substantial accuracy in separating correct from incorrect answers. We further show that similar surface-level artifacts are present in additional benchmarks. To counteract this, we developed a general mechanism to clean them by removing the most leakage-reinforcing pairs. We release a version of TruthfulQA with surface-feature leakage reduced close to chance and provide a mechanism, Audit-Prune, so that the datasets can be cleaned before release.

Foad Namjoo, Remy Ogasawara, Amirali Abdullah +3

University of Utah · Thoughtworks · University of Massachusetts Amherst +1

Data Leakage LLM Evaluation Question Answering LLM Honesty

Sep 8, 2026cs.CL

Benchmarking Hybrid Deep Research Across Database Querying and Web Search

While autonomous agents have made significant strides in "deep research" by iteratively navigating the open web to synthesize information, real-world problem-solving is rarely confined to a single environment. Complex analytical tasks inherently require agents to weave together evidence from both ambiguous unstructured text (e.g., the open web) and highly precise structured data (e.g., relational databases). However, existing benchmarks evaluate these modalities in isolation, failing to capture the critical "handoff" - the ability to preserve constraints when moving evidence between systems. We introduce HybridDeepResearch, to our knowledge the first deep-research benchmark that requires both web search and SQL to form a complete, verifiable answer. The benchmark contains 380 tool-dependent tasks grounded in LiveSQLBench-Base-Lite databases and public web corpora, validated through automated checks and human review, and covering three reasoning patterns: SQL2S, S2SQL, and Parallel. Evaluations across proprietary and open-weight models under various agentic scaffolds reveal that even state-of-the-art models like GLM-5.2, Claude-Sonnet-4.6 and GPT-5 achieve only about 50-54% Pass@8 on the hard subset. Notably, results show that directional reasoning is substantially more difficult than parallel intersection, highlighting that bridging structured and unstructured information spaces without losing constraints remains a major open challenge for agentic systems. Code and datasets are publicly available at GitHub (https://github.com/Snowflake-AI-Research/HybridDeepResearch) and Hugging Face (https://huggingface.co/datasets/Snowflake/HybridDeepResearch).

Ruofan Wu, Peiran Xu, Xiaolong Li +9

University of Houston · University of California, Los Angeles · The University of Hong Kong +2

Deep Research Agents Agentic Search Question Answering Hybrid IR Agent Benchmarks

Sep 8, 2026cs.CV

STSG-VQA: Evidence-Grounded Temporal Question Answering from Surgical Spatio-Temporal Scene Graphs

Despite recent advances in surgical vision-language models (VLMs), temporal reasoning remains limited because existing supervision is largely frame-centric. Frame-level scene graphs (SGs) have proven effective in providing structured representations of surgical environments but do not explicitly model the dynamics of surgical workflows. To explicitly model how surgical states evolve across time, we introduce a multi-level structured temporal supervision methodology that augments frame-level surgical SGs with object-level continuity, event-level interaction continuity, and procedure-level connectivity. We then execute temporal queries over the resulting spatio-temporal scene graphs (STSGs) to generate evidence-grounded question-answer pairs, which together form the STSG-VQA benchmark. Each question is linked to the temporal interval and STSG evidence used to derive its reference answer, enabling traceable verification. The benchmark contains 18,458 question-answer pairs across seven temporal categories. Fine-tuning Qwen3-VL-4B and Hulu-Med-4B with STSG-derived supervision improves question-level micro accuracy by 24.39 and 19.56 percentage points over their zero-shot baselines and by 16.50 and 14.25 points over static scene-graph supervision, respectively. These gains span all temporal categories, indicating that STSG-derived supervision helps surgical VLMs reason over temporally grounded interactions rather than isolated frames. The code and dataset will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Jing Li, Duygu Sarikaya

School of Computer Science, University of Leeds, UK

Medical VQA Question Answering Surgical Video Understanding Temporal QA Temporal Video Understanding

Sep 8, 2026cs.CL

SentryLine: Evidence-Grounded Question Answering over Evolving Documents in Oncology Care

Oncology care operates at constant pressure of absorbing rapidly evolving evidence base in biomedicine. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) addresses this through living guidelines, but the format introduces a new burden: any recommendation can change at any point, across multiple versioned documents. We present SENTRYLINE, a living guideline-aware clinical question answering system. SENTRYLINE retrieves guideline passages through a vectorless hierarchical RAG pipeline and returns a role-specific answer with inline citations, factual and temporal verification reports, and drift detection notes that surface when a guideline has been updated. We construct ASCOBENCH, a benchmark of 405 three-turn conversations across four question categories with gold answers from expert annotators(clinicians), and use test set to evaluate SENTRYLINE against five baselines under an LLM-as-judge framework. Experiments across three generation backbones show consistent improvements over four retrieval baselines and ASCO's guideline assistant, with particularly strong gains on Reasoning and Role-Specific questions where multi-hop synthesis and register adaptation are required

Tampu Ravi Kumar, Gaurav Najpande, Muhammad Ali Khan +7

Arizona State University · Mayo Clinic · Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College

Question Answering Clinical QA Oncology Evidence-Grounded Generation Temporal QA

Sep 8, 2026cs.AI

CIVI: A Framework for Diagnosing Search Agent Failures in Civic Information

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in public-sector settings, where incorrect guidance can cause irreversible harm. We introduce CIVI, the first framework for diagnosing search agent failures in civic information. Its benchmark instantiation jointly spans cross-national, interjurisdictional government contexts (federal, state, and local) and functional categories from an internationally adopted United Nations standard. We evaluate ten frontier search agents and find that none matches an attentive human baseline. Alongside accuracy, CIVI measures search invocation rate, selective no-search accuracy, and how often agents cite authoritative government sources. To perform this diagnosis, we introduce ARISE, which decomposes agentic search failures into four mutually exclusive modes, isolated via source-injection ablation. ARISE attributes 72.1% of all observed failures to retrieval-bound causes rather than to gaps in the models' parametric knowledge.

Dingying Liu, Yunshun Zhong, Wentao Zhang +1

University of Sydney · University of Toronto · University of Waterloo +1

Agent Failure Analysis AI Agent Reliability Question Answering AI Agent Benchmarks

Sep 4, 2026cs.AI

Does the Selected Object Reach the Reader? Auditing Identity Handoffs in Grounded Language-Model Pipelines

Grounded language-model pipelines can be divided into three stages: selecting an object, retrieving passages for it, and using that evidence to answer. If the selected object must reach the reader, losing it breaks the handoff. Benchmark recall checks the dataset-linked object, which can differ. We audit 600 HybridQA questions across three selector families. On 1,463 resolvable records where the selected object matches the dataset-traced passage, exact key lookup and exact title matching return the object every time. With every ranked rule given the same decoded selected title, body-only BM25 omits it on 389 records (26.6%) at cutoff five, while hybrid retrieval with reranking omits it on 14 (1.0%). The two identities differ on 329 of 1,792 resolvable records. With original-question rankings, their top-five checks disagree on 106 records (5.9%). Frozen reader comparisons associate the aligned object's presence with 28.6 to 31.0 points higher exact match. In a deliberately selected 64-item cohort, removing that passage sharply lowers exact match, while removing a similar-length comparison passage does not reproduce the drop. We release the Returned-Object Profile (ROP), an executable record of the target, returned-ID field, cutoff, membership rule, and complete expected population, with data and an offline replay.

Siddharth Vohra, Runmin Jiang, Xiaomo Li +1

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA · Amazon Web Services AI Native, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Question Answering RAG Evaluation IR Evaluation Language Model Auditing

Sep 3, 2026cs.CL

RuleMem: Active Rule Memory for Long-Term Conversational Agents

Question answering agents in long-term conversations must reason over massive, temporally dispersed dialogue histories. However, existing memory mechanisms primarily treat past information as \textit{passively} stored facts, leading to semantic gaps and unreliable reasoning. To address this limitation, we propose RuleMem, a rule-based memory framework that induces reusable logical rules from historical interactions to \textit{actively} guide both evidence retrieval and reasoning. Specifically, RuleMem constructs natural-language Horn clauses from conversations and validates them via a Rule Perplexity Consistency (RPC) mechanism. These induced rules enable the retrieval of semantically distant evidence while providing an explicit logical structure for answer generation. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of RuleMem on two long-term conversational benchmarks, LoCoMo and LongMemEval_s*. In a rigorous comparison against 14 baselines on LoCoMo, RuleMem achieved the highest accuracy, exceeding the baseline average by 27.47 points (a 54.3% relative improvement).

Xingyuan Zeng, Zuohan Wu, Quanming Yao +5

Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China · Tsinghua University, State Key Laboratory of Space Network and Communications, Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Beijing, China +2

Question Answering Long-Term Conversational Memory Memory-Augmented Language Model Agents

Sep 3, 2026cs.CL

When Retrieval Helps: Selective Retrieval for Single-Turn Mental-Health QA

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can improve the specificity and grounding of large language model responses, but its effect is not uniformly beneficial in single-turn mental-health question answering, where user queries often combine emotional distress, treatment concerns, and safety-sensitive needs. We study when retrieval helps or hurts mental-health QA, and whether a lightweight selective retrieval policy can better control this trade-off. We operationalize retrieval need using three draft-conditioned utility dimensions: psychoeducational need, coping need, and response specificity, together with a rule-based safety trigger. Following psychotherapy-grounded RAG systems such as coTherapist, we construct a compact and controllable guideline corpus comprising coping-strategy, psychoeducational, and safety resources. We fine-tune an instruction-tuned generator on MentalChat16K using QLoRA and compare Closed-book, Always Retrieval, and Selective Retrieval settings on CounselBench-Eval and CounselBench-Adv. Experiments show that retrieval is not uniformly beneficial in this domain. Always Retrieval improves specificity but lowers overall quality and introduces additional safety-sensitive failures. Selective Retrieval preserves closed-book behavior for low-need cases while avoiding the additional degradation caused by unconditional retrieval, supporting the view that retrieval activation is a safety-sensitive control decision.

Hyunseo Oh, Chong-Kwon Kim, Yoonhyuk Choi

Sookmyung Women’s University · Korea Institute of Energy Technology

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Mental Health Counseling Question Answering LLM Safety RAG Robustness

Sep 1, 2026cs.CL

Cite or Decline: A Strict Course-Grounded Chatbot for STEM Lecture Videos

Recorded lecture videos, often enhanced with search and summarization features, are a standard study resource. However, students cannot easily ask course specific questions or verify answers against an instructor's lecture. We report a semester-long deployment of VideoPoints platform with a retrieval-augmented chatbot that answers from course lecture materials and returns timestamped citations. The chatbot retrieves only from the active course, uses chapter summaries to guide transcript ranking, and returns clickable timestamped citations. Students used it for quick lookups and exam review. Across 833 messages, 70.5% included citations, none crossed a course boundary, and when no lecture evidence matched, the chatbot usually declined rather than answering. Among the users, citations were the most consistently useful feature, while practice-question generation was the strongest unmet request. We also evaluated the design on the real-world test split of EduVidQA, a public multimodal benchmark for lecture-video question answering. Our design improved correct-lecture retrieval by 6.3 percentage points over dense-only retrieval. Together, the results show that effective deployment depends on course isolation, supported citations, and alignment with students' study practices.

S M Masrur Ahmed, Jaspal Subhlok

University of Houston

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Question Answering Video QA Evidence-Grounded Generation Evidence Retrieval