Weakly Supervised Image Segmentation
Overview
Weakly supervised image segmentation studies how to produce dense pixel masks when detailed pixel-by-pixel annotations are scarce, costly, or unreliable. Common approaches turn image labels into class activation maps and pseudo-labels, propagate sparse annotations across regions, or use geometric, anatomical, and language-derived constraints; foundation models and vision-language features increasingly provide extra guidance. The methods are tested on standard semantic-segmentation benchmarks as well as medical, industrial, and remote-sensing images, where label types and structures vary widely. A central challenge is recovering complete objects and precise boundaries from incomplete or noisy cues while maintaining reliable performance across domains and annotation settings.
Latest papers
46 papers2 papers in the last four weeks, down 33% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.
Semantic Segmentation for Histopathology using Learned Regularization based on Global Proportions
Boxes2Pixels: Learning Defect Segmentation from Noisy SAM Masks
Weakly-Supervised Lung Nodule Segmentation via Training-Free Guidance of 3D Rectified Flow
ModuSeg: Decoupling Object Discovery and Semantic Retrieval for Training-Free Weakly Supervised Segmentation
PASTA: Vision Transformer Patch Aggregation for Weakly Supervised Target and Anomaly Segmentation
Weakly supervised multimodal segmentation of acoustic borehole images with depth-aware cross-attention
Point-to-Mask: From Arbitrary Point Annotations to Mask-Level Infrared Small Target Detection
Analytical Logit Scaling for High-Resolution Sea Ice Topology Retrieval from Weakly Labeled SAR Imagery
SAPNet++: Evolving Point-Prompted Instance Segmentation with Semantic and Spatial Awareness
Multimodal MRI Report Findings Supervised Brain Lesion Segmentation with Substructures
mild,'' possible''). Classical RSuper losses (e.g., sum volume consistency) can over-constrain or hallucinate unreported findings under such incompleteness, and are unable to utilize these hierarchical findings or exploit the priors of varied lesion types in a merged dataset. We explicitly parse the global quantitative and modality-wise qualitative findings and introduce a unified, one-sided, uncertainty-aware formulation (MS-RSuper) that: (i) aligns modality-specific qualitative cues (e.g., T1c enhancement, FLAIR edema) with their corresponding substructures using existence and absence losses; (ii) enforces one-sided lower-bounds for partial quantitative cues (e.g., largest lesion size, minimal multiplicity); and (iii) adds extra- vs. intra-axial anatomical priors to respect cohort differences. Certainty tokens scale penalties; missing cues are down-weighted. On 1238 report-labeled BraTS-MET/MEN scans, our MS-RSuper largely outperforms both a sparsely-supervised baseline and a naive RSuper method.