Disaster Damage Assessment

Remote sensing composed image retrieval (RSCIR) enables search in large satellite image archives using composed queries that combine a reference image with a textual modifier. Although RSCIR offers a flexible interface for expressing targeted retrieval intent, the transferability of modern composition methods to Earth observation (EO) imagery and their relevance to operational EO workflows remain underexplored. We address this gap through a unified benchmark and an application-oriented study. First, we systematically adapt and evaluate representative composed image retrieval methods with six vision-language backbones on PatternCom under a standardized protocol, analyzing their behavior across backbones, composition strategies, and query types. Second, we introduce xView2-CIR, a change-centric dataset for disaster and damage monitoring, where retrieval is conditioned on scene identity and a target post-event state. Our results show that training-free composition methods provide strong and scalable baselines for EO retrieval, while change-centric retrieval presents different challenges from attribute-based retrieval, particularly due to the need to preserve scene identity. Overall, this study establishes a practical benchmark for RSCIR and positions composed retrieval as a complementary tool for remote sensing image retrieval, archive exploration, and change analysis. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/billpsomas/rscir.

Post-disaster damage assessment requires rapid and accurate semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds to identify critical infrastructure such as damaged buildings and roads. Early Point Transformers (e.g., PTv1, PTv2) relied on computationally expensive neighbor searching (k-NN) and Farthest Point Sampling (FPS). To improve efficiency, recent architectures like Point Transformer V3 (PTv3) adopted static serialization methods, such as Hilbert curves or Z-order, to organize unstructured points for window-based attention. However, these fixed orderings are not optimal for capturing the complex geometry of disaster scenes. In this paper, we propose OPTNet (Ordering Point Transformer Network), which introduces a learnable Point Sorter module. OPTNet utilizes a self-supervised ordering loss to dynamically predict an optimal permutation that maximizes the locality of the attention mechanism. We evaluate our method on the 3DAeroRelief dataset, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baselines.

Rapid and accurate situational awareness is essential for effective response during natural disasters, where delays in analysis can significantly hinder decision-making. Training task-specific models for post-disaster assessment is often time-consuming and computationally expensive, making such approaches impractical in time-critical scenarios. Consequently, pretrained multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative for post-disaster visual question answering (VQA), a task that aims to answer structured questions about visual scenes by jointly reasoning over images and text. While these models demonstrate strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, their responses can be sensitive to prompt formulation, which can limit their reliability in real-world disaster assessment scenarios. In this paper, we investigate whether structured reasoning strategies can improve the reliability of pretrained MLLMs for post-disaster VQA. Specifically, we explore multiple prompting paradigms in which one MLLM is used to generate task-specific instructions that serve as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) guidance for a second MLLM. These instructions are incorporated during answer generation with varying degrees of in-context learning (ICL), enabling the model to leverage both explicit reasoning guidance and contextual examples. We conduct our evaluation on the FloodNet dataset and compare these approaches against a zero-shot baseline. Our results demonstrate that integrating instruction-driven CoT reasoning consistently improves answer accuracy.

Rapid and accurate damage assessment following natural disasters is critical for effective emergency response. However, identifying fine-grained damage levels (e.g., distinguishing minor from major roof damage) in UAV imagery remains challenging due to the degradation of texture cues during resizing and extreme class imbalance. We propose DA-SegFormer, a damage-aware adaptation of the SegFormer architecture optimized for high-resolution disaster imagery. Our method introduces a Class-Aware Sampling strategy to guarantee exposure to rare damage features, and it integrates Online Hard Example Mining (OHEM) with Dice Loss to dynamically focus on underrepresented classes. In addition, we employ a resolution-preserving inference protocol that maintains native texture details. Evaluated on the RescueNet dataset, DA-SegFormer achieves 74.61% mIoU, outperforming the baseline by 2.55%. Notably, our improvements yield double-digit gains in critical damage classes: Minor Damage (+11.7%) and Major Damage (+21.3%).

Rapid situational awareness is critical in post-disaster response. While remote sensing damage assessment is evolving from pixel-level change detection to high-level semantic analysis, existing vision-language methodologies still struggle to provide actionable intelligence for complex strategic queries. They remain severely constrained by unimodal optical dependence, a prevailing bias towards natural disasters, and a fundamental lack of grounded interactivity. To address these limitations, we present ChangeQuery, a unified multimodal framework designed for comprehensive, all-weather disaster situation awareness. To overcome modality constraints and scenario biases, we construct the Disaster-Induced Change Query (DICQ) dataset, a large-scale benchmark coupling pre-event optical semantics with post-event SAR structural features across a balanced distribution of natural catastrophes and armed conflicts. Furthermore, to provide the high-quality supervision required for interactive reasoning, we propose a novel Automated Semantic Annotation Pipeline. Adhering to a ``statistics-first, generation-later'' paradigm, this engine automatically transforms raw segmentation masks into grounded, hierarchical instruction sets, effectively equipping the model with fine-grained spatial and quantitative awareness. Trained on this structured data, the ChangeQuery architecture operates as an interactive disaster analyst. It supports multi-task reasoning driven by diverse user queries, delivering precise damage quantification, region-specific descriptions, and holistic post-disaster summaries. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ChangeQuery establishes a new state-of-the-art, providing a robust and interpretable solution for complex disaster monitoring. The code is available at https://sundongwei.github.io/changequery/.

Accurate and rapid structural damage assessment (SDA) is crucial for post-disaster management, helping responders prioritise resources, plan rescues, and support recovery. Traditional field inspections, though precise, are limited by accessibility, safety risks, and time constraints, especially after large explosions. Machine learning with remote sensing has emerged as a scalable solution for rapid SDA, with Mamba-based networks achieving state-of-the-art performance. However, these methods often require extensive training and large datasets, limiting real-world applicability. Moreover, they fail to incorporate key physical characteristics of blast loading for SDA. To overcome these challenges, we propose a Mamba-based multimodal network for rapid SDA that integrates multi-scale blast-loading information with optical remote sensing images. Evaluated on the 2020 Beirut explosion, our method significantly improves performance over state-of-the-art approaches. Code is available at: https://github.com/IMPACTSquad/Blast-Mamba

Living in a changing climate, human society now faces more frequent and severe natural disasters than ever before. As a consequence, rapid disaster response during the "Golden 72 Hours" of search and rescue becomes a vital humanitarian necessity and community concern. However, traditional disaster damage surveys routinely fail to generalize across distinct urban morphologies and new disaster events. Effective damage mapping typically requires exhaustive and time-consuming manual data annotation. To address this issue, we introduce Smart Transfer, a novel Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) framework, leveraging state-of-the-art vision Foundation Models (FMs) for rapid building damage mapping with post-earthquake Very High Resolution (VHR) imagery. Specifically, we design two novel model transfer strategies: first, Pixel-wise Clustering (PC), ensuring robust prototype-level global feature alignment; second, a Distance-Penalized Triplet (DPT), integrating patch-level spatial autocorrelation patterns by assigning stronger penalties to semantically inconsistent yet spatially adjacent patches. Extensive experiments and ablations from the recent 2023 Turkiye-Syria earthquake show promising performance in multiple cross-region transfer settings, namely Leave One Domain Out (LODO) and Specific Source Domain Combination (SSDC). Moreover, Smart Transfer provides a scalable, automated GeoAI solution to accelerate building damage mapping and support rapid disaster response, offering new opportunities to enhance disaster resilience in climate-vulnerable regions and communities. The data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/ai4city-hkust/SmartTransfer.

This paper argues that AI-enabled analysis of street-view imagery, complemented by performance-gated machine-learning imputation, provides a viable pathway for generating building-specific elevation data at regional scale for flood risk assessment. We develop and apply a three-stage pipeline across 18 areas of interest (AOIs) in Texas that (1) extracts LFE and the height difference between street grade and the lowest floor (HDSL) from Google Street View imagery using the Elev-Vision framework, (2) imputes missing HDSL values with Random Forest and Gradient Boosting models trained on 16 terrain, hydrologic, geographic, and flood-exposure features, and (3) integrates the resulting elevation dataset with Fathom 1-in-100 year inundation surfaces and USACE depth-damage functions to estimate property-specific interior flood depth and expected loss. Across 12,241 residential structures, street-view imagery was available for 73.4% of parcels and direct LFE/HDSL extraction was successful for 49.0% (5,992 structures). Imputation was retained for 13 AOIs where cross-validated performance was defensible, with selected models achieving R suqre values from 0.159 to 0.974; five AOIs were explicitly excluded from prediction because performance was insufficient. The results show that street-view-based elevation mapping is not universally available for every property, but it is sufficiently scalable to materially improve regional flood-risk characterization by moving beyond hazard exposure to structure-level estimates of interior inundation and expected damage. Scientifically, the study advances LFE estimation from a pilot-scale proof of concept to a regional, end-to-end workflow. Practically, it offers a replicable framework for jurisdictions that lack comprehensive Elevation Certificates but need parcel-level information to support mitigation, planning, and flood-risk management.

Rapid and accurate structural damage assessment following natural disasters is critical for effective emergency response and recovery. However, remote sensing imagery often suffers from low spatial resolution, contextual ambiguity, and limited semantic interpretability, reducing the reliability of traditional detection pipelines. In this work, we propose a novel hybrid framework that integrates AI-based super-resolution, deep learning object detection, and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for comprehensive post-disaster building damage assessment. First, we enhance pre- and post-disaster satellite imagery using a Video Restoration Transformer (VRT) to upscale images from 1024x1024 to 4096x4096 resolution, improving structural detail visibility. Next, a YOLOv11-based detector localizes buildings in pre-disaster imagery, and cropped building regions are analyzed using VLMs to semantically assess structural damage across four severity levels. To ensure robust evaluation in the absence of ground-truth captions, we employ CLIPScore for reference-free semantic alignment and introduce a multi-model VLM-as-a-Jury strategy to reduce individual model bias in safety-critical decision making. Experiments on subsets of the xBD dataset, including the Moore Tornado and Hurricane Matthew events, demonstrate that the proposed framework enhances the semantic interpretation of damaged buildings. In addition, our framework provides helpful recommendations to first responders for recovery based on damage analysis.

In the immediate aftermath of natural disasters, rapid situational awareness is critical. Traditionally, satellite observations are widely used to estimate damage extent. However, they lack the ground-level perspective essential for characterizing specific structural failures and impacts. Meanwhile, ground-level data (e.g., street-view imagery) remains largely inaccessible during time-sensitive events. This study investigates Satellite-to-Street View Synthesis to bridge this data gap. We introduce two generative strategies to synthesize post-disaster street views from satellite imagery: a Vision-Language Model (VLM)-guided approach and a damage-sensitive Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) method. We benchmark these against general-purpose baselines (Pix2Pix, ControlNet) using a proposed Structure-Aware Evaluation Framework. This multi-tier protocol integrates (1) pixel-level quality assessment, (2) ResNet-based semantic consistency verification, and (3) a novel VLM-as-a-Judge for perceptual alignment. Experiments on 300 disaster scenarios reveal a critical realism--fidelity trade-off: while diffusion-based approaches (e.g., ControlNet) achieve high perceptual realism, they often hallucinate structural details. Quantitative results show that standard ControlNet achieves the highest semantic accuracy, 0.71, whereas VLM-enhanced and MoE models excel in textural plausibility but struggle with semantic clarity. This work establishes a baseline for trustworthy cross-view synthesis, emphasizing that visually realistic generations may still fail to preserve critical structural information required for reliable disaster assessment.

Large earthquakes along the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) are expected to trigger widespread soil liquefaction that could disrupt transportation systems across the U.S. Pacific Northwest. However, past regional assessments have relied on simple geologic screening methods and binomial shaking thresholds that are only loosely informed by liquefaction science. This study introduces a mechanics-informed, data-driven framework for estimating liquefaction-induced road closures and service reductions, and the framework is applied to a magnitude-9 CSZ earthquake. Predicted liquefaction severity is translated into segment-level probabilities of closure and reduced service using empirically derived fragility relationships. These probabilities are mapped at 90-m resolution and propagated through the National Highway System using a spatially correlated Monte Carlo simulation to estimate link-level disruption. Results show that impacts are concentrated in low-lying coastal zones, river valleys, and urban waterfronts, with major disruptions expected along critical routes including U.S. Route 101. Local mobility is further examined in Pacific and Grays Harbor counties, Washington, where limited network redundancy, strong shaking, and high liquefaction susceptibility lead to elevated probabilities of isolation and loss of hospital access. Socioeconomic analysis reveals modest but statistically significant associations between road impacts and demographic indicators, suggesting that liquefaction impacts may compound with existing social vulnerabilities. While not a substitute for site-specific analysis, the results provide a regional baseline for emergency planning, risk communication, and prioritization of more advanced geotechnical sampling and analysis. Moreover, the methodology proposed here is not specific to the CSZ, but rather, could be applied to analogous studies of road impacts elsewhere.

Analyzing street-view imagery with computer vision models offers a promising approach for rapid, hyperlocal disaster damage assessment, but existing approaches typically rely on black-box pre-trained vision models, which lack interpretability and reliability. This study proposes DamageArbiter, a multimodal disagreement-driven arbitration framework designed to improve the accuracy and reliability of street-view-based damage assessment. DamageArbiter leverages the complementary strengths of unimodal and multimodal models and employs a lightweight logistic regression meta-classifier to arbitrate cases in which model predictions disagree. Using 2,556 post-disaster street-view images, paired with manually generated or large language model (LLM)-generated text descriptions, we systematically compared DamageArbiter with fine-tuned unimodal (image-only and text-only) models and CLIP-based multimodal models in terms of classification performance and overconfidence errors. Results show that DamageArbiter improved accuracy to 75.85% and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) to 0.6188, compared with the best-performing text-only baseline (63.07% accuracy, 0.4126 MCC), image-only baseline (74.33% accuracy, 0.5947 MCC), and CLIP baseline (74.22% accuracy, 0.5915 MCC). The overconfidence analysis further reveals that DamageArbiter substantially reduced the overconfidence error from 70.58% for the best-performing baseline, the image-only ViT model, to 16.45%. Overall, this study demonstrates that accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating disaster damage classification models and highlights the importance of measuring overconfidence errors as part of model reliability assessment. DamageArbiter thus offers a more reliable framework for rapid, hyperlocal disaster damage assessment from street-view imagery.

Rapid structural damage assessment from remote sensing imagery is essential for timely disaster response. Within human-machine systems (HMS) for disaster management, automated damage detection provides decision-makers with actionable situational awareness. However, models trained on multi-disaster benchmarks often underperform in unseen geographic regions due to domain shift - a distributional mismatch between training and deployment data that undermines human trust in automated assessments. We explore a two-stage ensemble approach using supervised domain adaptation (SDA) for building damage classification across four severity classes. The pipeline adapts the xView2 first-place method to the Ida-BD dataset using SDA and systematically investigates the effect of individual augmentation components on classification performance. Comprehensive ablation experiments on the unseen Ida-BD test split demonstrate that SDA is indispensable: removing it causes damage detection to fail entirely. Our pipeline achieves the most robust performance using SDA with unsharp-enhanced RGB input, attaining a Macro-F1 of 0.5552. These results underscore the critical role of domain adaptation in building trustworthy automated damage assessment modules for HMS-integrated disaster response.

Floods are among the costliest natural catastrophes globally, yet the property and casualty insurance industry's post-event response remains heavily reliant on manual field inspection: slow, expensive, and geographically constrained. Satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) offers cloud-penetrating, all-weather imaging uniquely suited to rapid post-flood assessment, but existing research evaluates SAR flood detection against academic benchmarks such as IoU and F1-score that do not capture insurance-workflow requirements. We present ALTIS: a five-stage pipeline transforming raw Sentinel-1 GRD and SLC imagery into property-level impact scores within 24-48 hours of flood peak. Unlike prior approaches producing pixel-level maps or binary outputs, ALTIS delivers a ranked, confidence-scored triage list consumable by claims platforms, integrating (i) multi-temporal SAR change detection using dual-polarization VV/VH intensity and InSAR coherence, (ii) physics-informed depth estimation fusing flood extent with high-resolution DEMs, (iii) property-level zonal statistics from parcel footprints, (iv) depth-damage calibration against NFIP claims, and (v) confidence-scored triage ranking. We formally define Insurance-Grade Flood Triage (IGFT) and introduce the Inspection Reduction Rate (IRR) and Triage Efficiency Score (TES). Using Hurricane Harvey (2017) across Harris County, Texas, we present preliminary analysis grounded in validated sub-components suggesting ALTIS is designed to achieve an IRR of approximately 0.52 at 90% recall of high-severity claims, potentially eliminating over half of unnecessary dispatches. By blending SAR flood intelligence with the realities of claims management, ALTIS establishes a methodological baseline for translating earth observation research into measurable insurance outcomes.

We present TornadoNet, a comprehensive benchmark for automated street-level building damage assessment evaluating how modern real-time object detection architectures and ordinal-aware supervision strategies perform under realistic post-disaster conditions. TornadoNet provides the first controlled benchmark demonstrating how architectural design and loss formulation jointly influence multi-level damage detection from street-view imagery, delivering methodological insights and deployable tools for disaster response. Using 3,333 high-resolution geotagged images and 8,890 annotated building instances from the 2021 Midwest tornado outbreak, we systematically compare CNN-based detectors from the YOLO family against transformer-based models (RT-DETR) for multi-level damage detection. Models are trained under standardized protocols using a five-level damage classification framework based on IN-CORE damage states, validated through expert cross-annotation. Baseline experiments reveal complementary architectural strengths. CNN-based YOLO models achieve highest detection accuracy and throughput, with larger variants reaching 46.05% [email protected] at 66-276 FPS on A100 GPUs. Transformer-based RT-DETR models exhibit stronger ordinal consistency, achieving 88.13% Ordinal Top-1 Accuracy and MAOE of 0.65, indicating more reliable severity grading despite lower baseline mAP. To align supervision with the ordered nature of damage severity, we introduce soft ordinal classification targets and evaluate explicit ordinal-distance penalties. RT-DETR trained with calibrated ordinal supervision achieves 44.70% [email protected], a 4.8 percentage-point improvement, with gains in ordinal metrics (91.15% Ordinal Top-1 Accuracy, MAOE = 0.56). These findings establish that ordinal-aware supervision improves damage severity estimation when aligned with detector architecture. Model & Data: https://github.com/crumeike/TornadoNet

Aerial imagery is critical for large-scale post-disaster damage assessment. Automated interpretation remains challenging due to clutter, visual variability, and strong cross-event domain shift, while supervised approaches still rely on costly, task-specific annotations with limited coverage across disaster types and regions. Recent open-vocabulary and foundation vision models offer an appealing alternative, by reducing dependence on fixed label sets and extensive task-specific annotations. Instead, they leverage large-scale pretraining and vision-language representations. These properties are particularly relevant for post-disaster domains, where visual concepts are ambiguous and data availability is constrained. In this work, we present a comparative evaluation of supervised learning and open-vocabulary vision models for post-disaster scene understanding, focusing on semantic segmentation and object detection across multiple datasets, including FloodNet+, RescueNet, DFire, and LADD. We examine performance trends, failure modes, and practical trade-offs between different learning paradigms, providing insight into their applicability for real-world disaster response. The most notable remark across all evaluated benchmarks is that supervised training remains the most reliable approach (i.e., when the label space is fixed and annotations are available), especially for small objects and fine boundary delineation in cluttered scenes.

Reliable post-disaster building damage assessment (BDA) from satellite imagery is hindered by severe class imbalance, background clutter, and domain shift across disaster types and geographies. In this work, we address these problems and explore ways to improve the MambaBDA, the BDA network of ChangeMamba architecture, one of the most successful BDA models. The approach enhances the MambaBDA with three modular components: (i) Focal Loss to mitigate class imbalance damage classification, (ii) lightweight Attention Gates to suppress irrelevant context, and (iii) a compact Alignment Module to spatially warp pre-event features toward post-event content before decoding. We experiment on multiple satellite imagery datasets, including xBD, Pakistan Flooding, Turkey Earthquake, and Ida Hurricane, and conduct in-domain and crossdataset tests. The proposed modular enhancements yield consistent improvements over the baseline model, with 0.8% to 5% performance gains in-domain, and up to 27% on unseen disasters. This indicates that the proposed enhancements are especially beneficial for the generalization capability of the system.

Rapid and accurate building damage assessment in the immediate aftermath of tornadoes is critical for coordinating life-saving search and rescue operations, optimizing emergency resource allocation, and accelerating community recovery. However, current automated methods struggle with the unique visual complexity of tornado-induced wreckage, primarily due to severe domain shift from standard pre-training datasets and extreme class imbalance in real-world disaster data. To address these challenges, we introduce a systematic experimental framework evaluating 79 open-source deep learning models, encompassing both Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers, across over 2,300 controlled experiments on our newly curated Quad-State Tornado Damage (QSTD) benchmark dataset. Our findings reveal that achieving operational-grade performance hinges on a complex interaction between architecture and optimization, rather than architectural selection alone. Most strikingly, we demonstrate that optimizer choice can be more consequential than architecture: switching from Adam to SGD provided dramatic F1 gains of +25 to +38 points for Vision Transformer and Swin Transformer families, fundamentally reversing their ranking from bottom-tier to competitive with top-performing CNNs. Furthermore, a low learning rate of 1x10^(-4) proved universally critical, boosting average F1 performance by +10.2 points across all architectures. Our champion model, ConvNeXt-Base trained with these optimized settings, demonstrated strong cross-event generalization on the held-out Tuscaloosa-Moore Tornado Damage (TMTD) dataset, achieving 46.4% Macro F1 (+34.6 points over baseline) and retaining 85.5% Ordinal Top-1 Accuracy despite temporal and sensor domain shifts.

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.