Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Latest papers

31 papers8 papers in the last four weeks, up 100% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Oct 11, 2026

Google Earth AI Geospatial Reasoning Agent: Capabilities and a Systematic Evaluation

Google Earth AI is a family of geospatial AI models, together with an agent that orchestrates them. We present this agent, Google Earth AI's Geospatial Reasoning agent (GRA), a Gemini-powered research system that combines geospatial data sources, foundation models, and tools to answer questions about our planet. GRA organizes these into modular domain skills and pairs them with upfront geospatial planning to decompose complex queries into multi-stage workflows. Evaluating such systems is hard: real-world problems admit multiple valid workflows, require data discovery across large catalogs, and rely on evolving ground truth. We introduce two benchmarks and release their development splits. GeoExpertQueries poses complex analytical problems grounded in practitioner use cases and refined by geospatial experts; each is paired with a consensus golden workflow from three independent experts and scored by a human-validated, tool-agnostic autorater. GeoKTools consists of templated queries with deterministic reference solvers that systematically vary the number of required tool types. We also use two external benchmarks, CBGB and UnivEARTH; the latter we find to be saturated. To isolate the contribution of GRA's tools and its agentic orchestration, we compare four configurations, each with Gemini 3.1 Pro and 3.8 Flash: a standalone LLM, the LLM with basic tools, the LLM with GRA's skills and tools but without its upfront planning and execution guidance, and GRA itself. With at most basic tools, an advanced model recovers much of the answer on templated queries but satisfies only a small fraction of the expert workflows on open-ended problems; GRA performs well on both. The largest step comes from GRA's skills and tools; on open-ended problems, its planning and execution guidance add a further gain with Gemini 3.8 Flash, letting Flash match or exceed Pro at lower cost.

Noam Slonim, Aviv Slobodkin, Gil Fidel +34

Google Research · Google Geo · Spatial Bytes

Geospatial QA Geospatial Reasoning AI Agent Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Foundation Models

Oct 9, 2026

PlacePulse: Learning Transferable Place Representations from Structural Geographic Data

Geospatial machine learning often depends on task-specific feature engineering over large collections of sociodemographic, business, and environmental variables. Geospatial foundation models offer reusable representations of place, but leading approaches typically encode dynamic signals, such as mobility and search activity, or visual signals from satellite imagery. Few models represent the static structural composition of places (who lives and works there, which businesses operate there, and which risks they face) as transferable embeddings at fine spatial resolution. We introduce PlacePulse, a structural geospatial foundation model that compresses 572 attributes, expanded to 2,288 inputs through H3 neighborhood aggregates, into 256-dimensional unit-norm embeddings for 1,055,537 H3 resolution-7 cells in the United States. We also introduce a reusable two-axis benchmark that separates intrinsic representation quality from downstream predictive utility across multiple targets and spatial supports. Intrinsically, the embeddings reconstruct standardized inputs with mean

R^2 = 0.853

, use 251 of 256 approximately decorrelated dimensions, and show strong spatial organization, with Moran's

I = 0.93

on the leading principal component and autocorrelation persisting beyond the input radius. Extrinsically, across 74 held-out targets from 12 external sources and four spatial supports, PlacePulse outperforms a dimensionality-matched feature-selection baseline on targets unrelated to the training inputs and is competitive with Google's Population Dynamics Foundation Model, leading on health, economic, election, economic-mobility and social-vulnerability outcomes, with relative strengths that vary by domain. These findings position structural composition as a distinct and complementary modality for geospatial foundation models, not simply a fallback where behavioral or imagery data are unavailable.

Lucía García-Duarte, Miguel Álvarez, Diego Vicente +2

(CARTO)

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Representation Learning Geospatial Foundation Models Representation Learning

Oct 9, 2026

Mind the Spatial Gap: A Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning and Constrained Spatial Editing

Understanding and manipulating spatial relations is fundamental to AI systems that reason about physical environments and construct grounded world models. However, existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for spatial reasoning rely predominantly on static question-answering (QA) over small-scale or synthetic scenes, rarely probing whether models can modify spatial configurations while satisfying explicit geometric constraints. We introduce GeoSpatialBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate an escalating progression of spatial cognition, ranging from spatial relation understanding and geometric reasoning to constrained spatial editing. Grounded in real-world urban data across six geographically diverse cities, GeoSpatialBench evaluates a comprehensive taxonomy of 28 topological, directional, metric, and ordering relations across structured GeoJSON and map image modalities, with ground-truth references and constraints verified via GIS operations. Our empirical evaluation across frontier MLLMs uncovers a stark spatial gap: structured GeoJSON consistently outperforms map images, with multimodal combinations offering no reliable gain over GeoJSON alone, and while models show reasonable competence on qualitative topological and ordering, performance drops on quantitative metric relations. Crucially, editing performance on ordering relations declines relative to QA, and most failed edits violate at least one specified spatial constraint. These results highlight a gap between passively recognizing spatial relations and actively manipulating geometric configurations. GeoSpatialBench provides an open, rigorous diagnostic testbed to benchmark these spatial limitations, laying essential empirical groundwork for physically grounded world models and embodied spatial AI.

Zheng Ren, Yanning Wang, Ziheng Huang +4

Urban Governance and Design (UGOD) Thrust The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) Guangzhou, China

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Spatial Reasoning Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks VLM Reasoning

Oct 8, 2026

GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks

Large language models are becoming central to GeoAI systems, yet their evaluation rarely considers the elicitation of geospatial data requirements. This omission is critical as retrieval oriented geo-analytic tasks cannot be supported reliably without first identifying the necessary datasets and constraints. GeoFitBench-LLM is introduced as a benchmark for assessing whether LLMs can infer the datasets, the supporting resources and the constraints required by geo-analytic requests in natural language. The benchmark is structured around two reasoning dimensions, Spatio-Temporal Relational and Semantic Grounding, reflecting long-standing challenges in geospatial information retrieval and related natural language tasks. Ground truth requirements are encoded in a fixed, provider-independent schema for reproducible evaluation of resource identification and attribute-level specification. Experiments on seven models under minimal prompting indicate that identifying the necessary resources is often achievable, with GPT-5.4 Thinking achieving the best result by recovering the complete set of resources in 66.67% of benchmark requests. Results further indicate that accurate fitness-for-use specification remains more difficult as inferential demands increase.

Amirhossein Vahdat, Thierry Badard, Luc Lamontagne

Département des Sciences Géomatiques, Université Laval, QC, Canada · Département d’informatique et de génie logiciel, Université Laval, QC, Canada

LLM Evaluation Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning LLM Grounding Requirements Engineering Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Oct 6, 2026

GeoNatureAgent (GNA): A Framework and Benchmark for Pre-Production Evaluation of Tool-Using Agents on Geospatial and Environmental Tasks

Before tool-using LLM agents are deployed in environmental and geospatial workflows, teams need evidence that an agent reliably selects the right operations against real APIs. We introduce GeoNatureAgent (GNA), a framework for pre-production evaluation of tool-using agents: a fixed sixteen-tool geospatial interface published as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, so the agent under test is the only variable, scored against an identical tool layer, task suite, and deterministic scorer. Its flagship instance is a 103-task benchmark (a 93-task main suite across 18 categories plus a ten-task comparison expansion) evaluated against an open, self-hostable geospatial API serving three environmental indicators across Spain and Portugal. We evaluate nine LLMs under three temperature-1.0 seeds, reporting capability and per-case cost as orthogonal axes. (1) Claude Sonnet 4 achieves the highest capability (61.7% +/- 0.7% on all 103 tasks; 60.8% on the main suite), followed closely by DeepSeek V3.2 (57.9%), while no other model exceeds 53%; (2) the cost-accuracy Pareto frontier is mostly open-weight, with DeepSeek V3.2 offering 93% of Claude's capability at 11.3x lower list-price cost; (3) under strict all-checks scoring the best model sits 24-36 points below the 85-97% reported on general-purpose GIS benchmarks, whereas per-check partial credit for the top four models (86-90%) is comparable, so much of that gap reflects scoring strictness rather than task difficulty alone. The MCP server, evaluation harness, benchmark, and API are publicly available; swapping the tool executors and task suite instantiates an equivalent benchmark for any geospatial domain.

Gabriel Diaz-Ireland, Diego Prieto-Herráez, Mario García Peces +3

Universidad Católica de Ávila (UCAV) Ávila, Spain · Independent Researcher Madrid, Spain · Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA +1

Tool-Use Evaluation LLM Agent Evaluation AI Agent Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning

Sep 30, 2026

KilometerVision: A New Frontier for Large-Scale Spatial Intelligence in VLMs

We push the frontier of large-scale spatial intelligence in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and introduce the first benchmark that probes geographical layout understanding from real-world videos, spanning up to 1km distances. Inspired by the cognitive science literature, we evaluate models against the hierarchical stages of human spatial awareness: anchoring via landmarks, connecting them through routes, and integrating these into global mental maps. Extensive experiments reveal a fundamental divergence in how current AI models process spatial information. Instead of utilising true path integration or forming geometric survey knowledge, we find that VLMs rely almost entirely on 2D visual recognition and text-matching to bypass complex spatial reasoning. The benchmark is publicly available at https://perception-test-challenge.github.io/kilometervision.html.

Aravindh Mahendran, Michael King, Matthew Koichi Grimes +12

Google DeepMind, Berlin, Germany · Google DeepMind, London, UK · Princeton University, Princeton, USA +3

Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Visual Spatial Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning VLM Reasoning Spatial Reasoning in Language Models Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Sep 30, 2026

Network-based Spatial Context Retrieval for Open-weight LLMs: A Faithfulness Benchmark for Grounded Geographic Reasoning

Large language models (LLMs) encode substantial latent geographic knowledge, yet they reason poorly over space and are unreliable when queried from coordinates alone. Useful behaviour emerges only when structured spatial context is supplied in the prompt. This raises a question geographic evaluation has left unexamined: once the right context is supplied, does the model reason from it, or override it with its own parametric recall? We take up this question with an open pipeline for network-based spatial context retriev-al. In it, the surroundings of a selected point are defined by the pedestrian street network, the area actually reachable on foot. Using only open data and open-weight models, the pipeline retrieves features from OpenStreetMap and the GHS-POP population grid, computes indicators over the network catchment in code, and injects them as a compact spatial brief. On this basis we build a faithfulness benchmark. It labels every claim a model makes by its source (grounded in the brief, or drawn from training knowledge) and its correctness, and it probes each case with a planted false premise that the brief refutes. We evaluate sixteen open-weight model configurations across three families (Qwen, Gemma and Llama, with Gemma in two generations), four size classes and, where available, both thinking and non-thinking modes, on three con-trasting cities, resampling every case over ten seeds. The results show that resistance to the planted premise varies more strongly by model family and generation than by scale, while brief-reading competence forms a partly separate dimension. These behaviours are not captured by conventional world-correctness scores or single-shot evaluation. We release the implementation, spatial briefs, model outputs, and claim-level labels as a reproducible workflow at github.com/perezjoan/NSCR-LLM.

Joan Perez

Urban Geo Analytics

Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks LLM Grounding Geospatial Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial QA Spatial Context Modeling

Sep 21, 2026

MIND the Gap: A Geographic Implicit Neural Representation with Adjustable Spatial Scale

Geographic measurements are often sparse, leaving large areas without labels for the quantities we want to map. Geographic implicit neural representations (INRs) provide coordinate-based embeddings that can be combined with sparse labels to predict at unsampled locations without satellite imagery at inference. Yet existing INRs are largely evaluated with random holdouts, leaving their ability to generalize across larger geographic gaps unclear. We introduce Matryoshka Implicit Neural Distillation (MIND), a geographic INR whose spatial granularity can be adjusted after training. MIND distills several pretrained geospatial models using nested supervision at increasing embedding dimensions, dividing the representation into contiguous chunks. Early chunks capture broad spatial patterns, while later chunks add increasingly local variation. Downstream models can retain only the leading chunks or use our Chunked Penalty to reduce reliance on later chunks without retraining the INR. We also introduce CoordBench, comprising

52

datasets and

78

targets with both random and regional holdouts at multiple spatial scales. Across CoordBench, fine-scale features help most when labels are nearby, while smoother representations generalize better across larger geographic gaps. MIND with the Chunked Penalty achieves the highest aggregate regression and classification performance among tested INRs and the highest overall performance under regional holdout. These results show that geographic representations should be evaluated and adapted according to the spatial separation between labeled and prediction locations.

Isaac Corley, Arjun Rao, Esther Rolf +7

Taylor Geospatial · University of British Columbia · Vector Institute +7

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Representation Learning Hierarchical Representation Learning Spatial Generalization Knowledge Distillation

Sep 4, 2026

GeoContext: One Context Ladder, Two Failure Modes in Vision-Language Geolocation: Flat Reliance on User-Provided Location Context and False Confirmation of Location Claims

Visual geolocation benchmarks typically ask a model where an image was captured without accounting for the location context that users often provide. We introduce GeoContext, a resource supporting two complementary tasks: GeoHint, open-ended localization given a true but coarse location hint, and GeoVerify, binary verification of whether an image was taken within 150 m of a claimed place. GeoContext constructs a context ladder by stratifying nearby reference points according to distance and referenceability, allowing the image to remain fixed while the supplied context varies. The benchmark covers 109 sites in 30 cities and evaluates five vision-language models using 21,933 GeoHint responses and 6,270 GeoVerify responses. Our evaluation reveals three main patterns. First, hint repetition varies by only 1.5 percentage points across referenceability tiers and by less than 3 points across distance bands, while the resulting localization error increases steadily with hint distance. Second, behavior depends strongly on no-context performance: at sites with low no-context accuracy, the median ratio between localization error and hint distance is approximately 1.00, whereas at higher-accuracy sites it ranges from 0.24 to 0.69. After correcting for bias introduced by the site grouping procedure, only one of the five models retains a negative accuracy estimate when given a nearby hint. Third, in GeoVerify, no model reaches d' = 1 for decoys immediately beyond the 150 m tolerance. Model rankings also change when sensitivity is separated from response bias, and 83.8% of false acceptances are reported with confidence of at least 0.8. We release the benchmark, construction pipeline, audit decisions, and scoring code.

Yifan Zhang, Kai Wang

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks VLM Evaluation Geospatial Reasoning Vision-Language Models Claim Verification

Aug 30, 2026

GeoAgent: Evaluating VLM Geolocalization Through Embodied Navigation

Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform well above the human baseline in image geolocalization, a task critically important in disaster response, OSINT verification, and location privacy. However, most efforts to study AI behavior on the task remain limited to static image-based retrieval, classification, and predictions. We argue that faithful recreation of the task should involve embodied navigation, where a multimodal agent autonomously explores its surroundings to gather observations before submitting a prediction. To this end, we introduce GeoAgent, an agentic environment-based benchmark that requires agents to navigate Street View environments to refine their geolocalization through sequential reasoning. Our analysis shows that modern VLMs struggle to discern regional patterns while succeeding at country- and continent-level predictions. When compared to static image-based baselines, agentic navigation significantly improves accuracy across established metrics. We also note severe bias in a developed/developing region context across frontier model architectures and poor self-improvement capabilities given incorrect priors. Overall, our work establishes the challenges of embodied navigation and geospatial reasoning. We publicly release our code and the GeoAgent environment: https://geoagent-benchmark.github.io

Arka Mukherjee, Soham Roy, Kartikeya Trivedi +1

KIIT Bhubaneswar · IIT Bhubaneswar

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks VLM Reasoning Cross-View Geo-Localization Vision-Language Navigation

Aug 25, 2026

LifePlanner: Evaluating LLM Agents for Geo-spatial Planning with Social Media Data

Geo-spatial planning, like trip design, is a realistic testbed for LLM agents because it requires grounded tool use, noisy evidence retrieval, and multi-constraint reasoning. Most benchmarks, however, only provide clean geospatial data and tools, missing the open-ended social signals that people use in daily planning. We introduce LifePlanner, a benchmark that enriches map data with large-scale local social media posts and provides access through an MCP toolset. LifePlanner provides an evaluation suite spanning four task categories and three difficulty levels. Experiments show frontier LLMs perform well on simple retrieval but degrade sharply on complex planning, with the Pass Rate dropping to 40.2%. Results show that failures mainly stem from incomplete evidence acquisition from such a large multimodal database, imprecise tool use, and weak constraint integration rather than model size or reasoning length, suggesting that future progress requires effective grounded planning instead of scaling alone.

Zhen Dong, Yuning Peng, Yutao Shi +4

Wuhan University · Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks LLM Agent Evaluation Tool-Use Planning Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning

Aug 25, 2026

GeoRefer-Bench: A Benchmark from Referring Pixels to Verifiable Geospatial Reasoning

Referring segmentation in overhead imagery is inherently relational: a query may ask for the buildings north of the road or the pond closest to a residential area, so the correct referent can contain one object, several objects, or none. Existing benchmarks mainly score mask overlap, which cannot verify whether a model actually resolved the stated spatial relation. We introduce GeoRefer-Bench, a benchmark for verifiable geospatial referring segmentation. Each query is represented by an executable logical form over a metric scene graph, and predictions are evaluated with Exact Query Success (EQS), which is satisfied only when the returned instance set exactly matches the set denoted by the query. GeoRefer-Bench contains 700 whole 2048x2048 UAV scenes (2.94 Gpx) at 12.5 and 25 cm ground sampling distance, 26,217 instances, 142,796 spatial relations, and 20,916 executable queries spanning five reasoning levels. It further includes three paraphrases per query, 24.0% unanswerable queries, 2,477 counterfactual pairs, and five leakage-controlled evaluation splits. An independent audit re-derives object geometry, mask ownership, relation values, query execution, and split provenance, finding zero issues across all 700 scenes. Relation-blind strategies can retain non-trivial mIoU while achieving at most 22.7 EQS overall, showing that overlap alone does not certify relational grounding. Across fifteen current models, the strongest reaches 74.1 EQS but drops from 98.9 at level 1 to 60.5 at level 5, while ten models score below 5 EQS on two-hop queries. GeoRefer-Bench turns geospatial referring segmentation from mask matching into verifiable reference resolution.

Shuaishuai Cao, Min Huang, Meng Tang +3

Central South University · Jiangxi Normal University · Hohai University +2

Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Referring Image Segmentation Reasoning Segmentation Remote Sensing Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Aug 7, 2026

GeoBenchLLM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Geo-Related Tasks

In the context of geodata, existing Large Language Models have often been studied in a homogeneous setting, which has considerably limited insights into their generalization capabilities. In this paper, we present \benchName, a comprehensive benchmark for probing LLMs on geo-related tasks. We leverage a careful selection of twelve publicly available datasets from diverse geo-related tasks and domains, and evaluate a set of LLMs on geo-spatial and temporal understanding using our benchmark. Our results show that reasoning and size have a strong impact on overall performance. GeoBenchLLM is publicly available at https://github.com/Rfr2003/GeoBenchLLM.

Rodrigo Ferreira Rodrigues, Karim Radouane, Jose G Moreno +1

University of Toulouse Toulouse, France

Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks LLM Evaluation Temporal Reasoning in Language Models Geospatial Reasoning Language Modeling Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Aug 4, 2026

MultiGlobeQA: A Multilingual and Globally Diverse Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning

Geospatial reasoning, i.e., computing distances, containment, and other spatial relations over real-world entities, is central to navigation and logistics, yet large language models (LLMs) struggle with the required geometric and topological computation despite storing considerable geographic knowledge. Existing benchmarks localize these failures only partially: they are synthetic or smallscale, largely monolingual, and offer limited control over geographic coverage. We introduce MultiGlobeQA, a multilingual benchmark of 46,060 question-answer pairs spanning 14 spatial-function families and 15 answer formats, with execution-based ground truth over three knowledge graphs. It covers 201 countries and territories via income- and density-stratified sampling, with parallel questions in English and 16 additional high- and low-resource languages. Across parametric, reasoning, and agentic settings, LLMs collapse on tasks requiring grid indexing and shape computation, while topological relations and directions fare best. Retrieval and tool use yield considerable gains, yet performance plateaus below two thirds even when gold facts are supplied, indicating that computation, not access to knowledge, is the bottleneck. Models also underperform on low-income regions, a gap that gold facts widen rather than close.

Martin Böckling, Elizaveta Nosova, Heiko Paulheim +1

Data and Web Science Group, University of Mannheim, Germany

Spatial Reasoning Multilingual QA Multilingual Language Model Evaluation Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Jurisdictional Bias in Language Models+3

Aug 4, 2026

Geo-Embed: Towards Unified Multimodal Embeddings for Urban Understanding

Geospatial and urban applications increasingly require models to compare heterogeneous evidence across street-view imagery, remote-sensing observations, text descriptions, region proposals, and temporal change cues. However, existing multimodal embedding models and benchmarks are still largely designed and evaluated around general-purpose image-text matching, leaving unclear whether unified embedding space can support heterogeneous geospatial tasks involving spatial relationships, fine-grained semantics, and temporal changes. To address this gap, we make three key contributions. First, we introduce GeoMEB, a large-scale multimodal embedding benchmark that standardizes 45 urban evaluation tasks across retrieval, visual question answering, change detection, classification, and visual grounding, together with training collections comprising 1.32M examples and 286K evaluation queries. Second, we present Geo-Embed, a unified embedding model that adapts a shared vision-language backbone to instruction-conditioned query-target matching over heterogeneous geospatial inputs, including single images, multiple images, text, regions, and masks. On GeoMEB, Geo-Embed achieves the strongest overall performance among representative multimodal embedders, with a 15.3% relative improvement over the strongest baseline. These results motivate future geospatial embedders that organize training and evaluation around explicit query-target relations, including semantic, cross-view, region-level, and temporal correspondence.

Jiapeng Li, Yong Li, Junjie Zhou +2

1Peking University · 2Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

Geospatial Representation Learning Cross-Modal Retrieval Vision-Language Grounding Multimodal Model Evaluation Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Aug 3, 2026

GISAgentBench: A Practitioner-Sourced Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on GIS Tasks

Geographic Information System (GIS) professionals rely on multi-step spatial analysis workflows to support decision-making in urban planning, disaster response, and environmental monitoring. The process is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone. While recent large language model (LLM) agents equipped with external tools have the potential to automate geospatial analysis, their ability to perform realistic GIS workflows remains largely unexplored. Existing GIS agent benchmarking datasets are mostly drawn from textbooks, tutorials, or LLM-generated seeds and remain limited in size and trajectory depth. More importantly, none provides ground truth outputs. They therefore rely on surrogate signals such as code similarity, trajectory matching, or LLM and VLM judges, which can conflate workflow resemblance with task correctness. To address this gap, we introduce GISAgentBench, a benchmark of 349 multi-step GIS tasks curated from GIS Stack Exchange and instantiated on real public data across six selected geographic areas of interest. Each task ships with an executable reference trajectory and an exact ground truth output file, enabling strict, deterministic, tolerance-aware output matching beyond LLM judging. Evaluations of six LLM models reveal that realistic GIS workflows remain challenging: the best agent completes only 32.7% of tasks under strict tolerance-aware scoring, although most models produce outputs that are close to the ground truth.

Abhinav Pothuri, Zhe Jiang, Zelin Xu +1

Department of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, University of Florida · Department of Geography, University of Florida

LLM Agent Evaluation AI Agent Benchmarks Spatial Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Jul 20, 2026

Do Maps Still Matter for Machines: Revisiting the Role of Choropleth Maps in Foundation Model Spatial Understanding

Spatial understanding is crucial for foundation models (FMs), and maps have long helped humans organize and reason about geographic information. This study examines whether choropleth maps remain useful for machine spatial understanding when models can directly process structured geodata. We introduce ChoroplethMap-Bench, a controlled benchmark containing 2,400 synthetic choropleth maps, corresponding GeoJSON data, and 12,000 questions across five cognitive dimensions: Identify, Spatial Recognition, Compare, Rank, and Delineate. We evaluate 22 open-source and proprietary models under three input conditions: Data Only, Map Only, and Data + Map. The results show that maps substantially improve spatial reasoning, especially when combined with symbolic data and for tasks requiring higher-level understanding of spatial patterns. We further analyze the effects of map type, color hue, and spatial structure, as well as prompting strategies, language, geographic context, decoding settings, classification methods, and response stability. Overall, the Data + Map condition achieves the strongest performance, demonstrating that maps remain valuable external representations for foundation model spatial reasoning.

Zhiwei Wei, Yonghe Sun, Zhenjia Liu +5

aSchool of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China · bHunan Key Laboratory of Geospatial Big Data Mining and Application, Changsha, China · cSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China +3

Data Visualization Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Visual Spatial Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Foundation Models Geospatial Reasoning+2

Jul 14, 2026

TerraLogic: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Geospatial Reasoning in Earth Observation

Beyond perception, reasoning is essential in remote sensing for advanced interpretation, inference, and decision-making. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled tool-augmented agents that leverage external tools to perform complex analytical tasks. However, existing studies in remote sensing primarily focus on perception-oriented tasks, leaving cognitive geospatial reasoning largely underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce TerraLogic, a benchmark for geospatial reasoning. TerraLogic comprises 545 scenario-driven, hierarchy-aware tasks, such as hazard vulnerability assessment, urban heat island analysis, and forest fragmentation dynamics, spanning optical, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and infrared (IR) imagery. It advances evaluation beyond recognition and monitoring toward cognitive-level geospatial analysis. To facilitate evaluation on TerraLogic, we further propose HieraPlan, a tool-augmented agent that organizes toolkits into functional hierarchies and performs fault-tolerant reasoning. HieraPlan enables structured abstraction, robust recovery from tool failures, and stable long-horizon planning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that current approaches struggle with hierarchical geospatial reasoning, while HieraPlan provides a strong baseline with improved reasoning, cross-modal generalization, and error handling. The dataset and agent code are publicly available at https://github.com/Ireliya/TerraLogic.

Yuhang Yan, Linchao Mou, Bokang Yang +1

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) China · Technical University of Munich Germany

Spatial Reasoning Hierarchical Planning Tool-Augmented Language Model Agents Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Remote Sensing Geospatial Reasoning+3

Jun 21, 2026

MapReason-OSM: Can Vision-Language Models Make Graph-Verifiable Mobility Decisions from Street Maps ?

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to read maps for logistics, delivery, and accessible navigation, where the output is an actionable decision (a route, a pin, a parking choice) that must respect the road network. Yet most map benchmarks grade free text or multiple-choice answers that cannot be verified against the underlying graph. We present MapReason-OSM, a benchmark and evaluation harness for graph-verifiable mobility decisions on self-rendered OpenStreetMap panels. We render fixed-style maps for ten U.S. downtowns at two aligned zoom scales, overlay a consistent marker grammar, and pair each panel with a hidden street graph and exact oracles, yielding 6,000 instances (12,000 panels across the two zooms) over 12 routing, facility-location, and visual disambiguation tasks. Models return structured decisions that we snap back to the graph and score for validity, legality, optimality, and constraint satisfaction, plus cross-zoom consistency. Across seven VLMs, models read maps and route simply but fail at graph cost reasoning (single-facility pin placement is near chance even for frontier reasoning models), and are frequently scale-inconsistent. We release the benchmark, harness, and deterministic generator. Code and data: https://github.com/Vi-Sri/mapreason-osm

Srinivas Venkatanarayanan, Clement Pakkam Isaac

NVIDIA · University of Central Florida · University of South Florida

Geospatial Reasoning Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Visually Grounded Reasoning VLM Evaluation VLM Reasoning Graph-Based Planning+1

Jun 11, 2026

GeoNatureAgent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Environmental Geospatial Analysis Across Frontier and Open-Weight Foundation Models

Environmental scientists spend disproportionate effort on data wrangling rather than analysis. New AI agents can be a helpful tool, but no benchmark exists to evaluate AI agents that automate environmental geospatial workflows through structured tool calling against real APIs. We introduce the GeoNatureAgent Benchmark, the first benchmark for environmental analysis agents that operate via structured tool calls to a production-style geospatial API. The benchmark comprises 93 tasks across 18 categories. Tasks are evaluated against an open, self-hostable geospatial API that serves three environmental indicators across Spain and Portugal via sixteen tools. We evaluate nine frontier and open-weight LLMs, reporting capability and per-case cost as orthogonal axes. Results manifest that (1) Claude Sonnet 4 achieves the highest capability at 60.8% +/- 0.8%, followed closely by DeepSeek V3.2 at 56.3% +/- 3.1%, while no other model exceeds 51%; (2) the cost-accuracy Pareto frontier is occupied mostly by open-weight models, with DeepSeek V3.2 offering 93% of Claude's capability at 11.6x lower cost; and (3) structured tool calling against a real API provides a more discriminative measure of real-world agent capability, with mean accuracies 25-35 percentage points below those reported on general-purpose GIS benchmarks.

Gabriel Diaz-Ireland, Diego Prieto-Herráez, Mario García Peces +2

Universidad Católica de Ávila (UCAV) Ávila, Spain · Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA · Independent Researcher Madrid, Spain +1

LLM Agent Evaluation Geospatial Reasoning AI Agent Benchmarks LLM Agents Data Analysis Agents Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

Jun 1, 2026

Plan2Map: A Multimodal Benchmark for Document-Grounded Geospatial Boundary Reconstruction from Planning Records

Planning records define restrictions over geographic areas, but their source documents often provide only indirect spatial evidence rather than machine-readable boundaries. We introduce Plan2Map, a 208-case multimodal benchmark for document-grounded geospatial boundary reconstruction from UK planning records. Given only a source planning document, systems must reconstruct a valid geospatial boundary from notice text, schedules, map plates, map labels, and boundary annotations; the reference GeoJSON is held out for scoring. We propose GeoPlanAgent, a document-grounded, geospatial-tool-in-the-loop system that decomposes the task into evidence extraction, localisation, map registration, boundary segmentation, projection, and verification. On Plan2Map, GeoPlanAgent achieves 0.736 mean IoU and 0.904 median IoU, with 67.8% of predictions at or above 0.8 IoU, substantially outperforming direct VLM-to-GeoJSON baselines. Diagnostic analysis shows that direct VLM prediction remains unreliable, while remaining errors are concentrated in localisation and map registration, and supervised boundary segmentation substantially improves pixel-level mask quality. Plan2Map provides a concrete testbed for multimodal geospatial reconstruction from public planning records. Project page: https://odeb1.github.io/Plan2Map_Project_Page/.

Fabian Degen, Oishi Deb, Jindong Gu +4

University of Oxford · 2Google DeepMind

Geospatial Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks

May 29, 2026

ERGeoBench:A Comprehensive Benchmark for Embodied Reasoning and Geo-localization in Multimodal Large Language Models

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential as embodied agents, yet embodied geo-localization remains underexplored due to the lack of fine-grained evaluation. We introduce ERGeoBench, a diagnostic benchmark for vision-driven embodied geo-localization. ERGeoBench evaluates models under three progressive settings -- single-view, panorama-view, and embodied-view -- where agents may actively acquire observations through sequential changes in yaw, pitch, and zoom. The benchmark contains 2,207 globally distributed street-view panoramas and measures four complementary capabilities: foundational perception, spatial awareness, common sense reasoning, and geo-localization reasoning. Evaluations of leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs show that current models can infer high-level geographic semantics, but still struggle with fine-grained perceptual operations, metric localization, and spatial consistency across views. We further observe that geo-localization is strongly correlated with the other capability dimensions, suggesting that accurate localization depends on integrated perception, spatial reasoning, and commonsense inference rather than isolated visual recognition. Overall, ERGeoBench provides a unified framework for diagnosing and advancing human-like embodied geo-localization. Project Page: https://kaixuewen.github.io/ERGeoBench/

Kaiwen Xue, Tao Wei, Guoxin Zhang +5

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China · State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China · School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China +2

Multimodal Large Language Models Visual Spatial Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning+1

May 19, 2026

GeoX: Mastering Geospatial Reasoning Through Self-Play and Verifiable Rewards

Geospatial reasoning requires solving image-grounded problems over the complex spatial structure of a scene. However, developing this capability is hindered by the cost of annotating a vast and combinatorial question space. We propose GeoX, a self-play framework that acquires spatial logic through executable programs that yield verifiable rewards, without relying on large-scale human-curated data Given a satellite or aerial image, our framework employs a single multimodal policy that proposes spatial problems as executable programs and solves them under three reasoning modes-abduction, deduction, and induction-over spatial primitives and an image understanding tool. A verifier executes each program to covert a reward signal that jointly optimizes the two roles via reinforcement learning. GeoX consistently improves its base VLMs by up to 5.5 points on average, matching or exceeding conventional baselines trained on millions of curated data. Along-side the proposed method, we release a benchmark for geospatial understanding accumulated through self-play.

Kyeongjin Ahn, Seungeon Lee, Krishna P. Gummadi +1

KAIST · MPI-SWS · MPI-SP

Spatial Reasoning Self-Play RL Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning VLM Reasoning Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards+2

May 12, 2026

GeoR-Bench: Evaluating Geoscience Visual Reasoning

Geoscience intelligence is expected to understand, reason about, and predict earth system changes to support human decision-making in critical domains such as disaster response, climate adaptation and environmental protection. Although current research has shown promising progress on specific geoscience tasks, such as remote sensing interpretation, geographic question-answering, existing benchmarks remain largely task-specific which failing to capture the open-ended real world geoscience problems. As a result, it remains unclear how far current AI systems are from achieving genuine geoscience intelligence. To address this gap, we present GeoR-Bench, a Benchmark for evaluating Geoscience visual Reasoning through reasoning informed visual editing tasks. GeoR-Bench contains 440 curated samples spanning 6 geoscience categories and 24 task types, covering earth observation imagery and structured scientific representations such as maps and diagrams. We evaluate outputs along three dimensions, including reasoning, consistency, and quality. Benchmark results of 21 closed- and open-source multimodal models reveal that geoscience reasoning remains a critical bottleneck. The highest-performing model achieves 42.7% overall strict accuracy, while the best open-source models only get 10.3%. Notably, the visual consistency and image quality of the outputs frequently surpass their scientific accuracy. Ultimately, these findings indicate that current models generate superficially plausible results but fail to capture underlying earth science processes.

Yushuo Zheng, Zicheng Zhang, Huiyu Duan +7

Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Beijing University of Technology

Remote Sensing Image Understanding Geospatial Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Earth Science

Apr 8, 2026

EVGeoQA: Benchmarking LLMs on Dynamic, Multi-Objective Geo-Spatial Exploration

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities, their potential for purpose-driven exploration in dynamic geo-spatial environments remains under-investigated. Existing Geo-Spatial Question Answering (GSQA) benchmarks predominantly focus on static retrieval, failing to capture the complexity of real-world planning that involves dynamic user locations and compound constraints. To bridge this gap, we introduce EVGeoQA, a novel benchmark built upon Electric Vehicle (EV) charging scenarios that features a distinct location-anchored and dual-objective design. Specifically, each query in EVGeoQA is explicitly bound to a user's real-time coordinate and integrates the dual objectives of a charging necessity and a co-located activity preference. To systematically assess models in such complex settings, we further propose GeoRover, a general evaluation framework based on a tool-augmented agent architecture to evaluate the LLMs' capacity for dynamic, multi-objective exploration. Our experiments reveal that while LLMs successfully utilize tools to address sub-tasks, they struggle with long-range spatial exploration. Notably, we observe an emergent capability: LLMs can summarize historical exploration trajectories to enhance exploration efficiency. These findings establish EVGeoQA as a challenging testbed for future geo-spatial intelligence. The dataset and prompts are available at https://github.com/kg-bnu/EVGeoQA.

Jianfei Wu, Zhichun Wang, Zhensheng Wang +1

School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China · Beijing Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence for Education, Beijing 100875, China · Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Technology and Educational Application, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China +1

Geospatial QA Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning LLM Evaluation Question Answering Tool-Augmented Language Model Agents

Apr 5, 2026

GeoBrowse: A Geolocation Benchmark for Agentic Tool Use with Expert-Annotated Reasoning Traces

Deep research agents integrate fragmented evidence through multi-step tool use. BrowseComp offers a text-only testbed for such agents, but existing multimodal benchmarks rarely require both weak visual cues composition and BrowseComp-style multi-hop verification. Geolocation is a natural testbed because answers depend on combining multiple ambiguous visual cues and validating them with open-web evidence. Thus, we introduce GeoBrowse, a geolocation benchmark that combines visual reasoning with knowledge-intensive multi-hop queries. Level 1 tests extracting and composing fragmented visual cues, and Level 2 increases query difficulty by injecting long-tail knowledge and obfuscating key entities. To support evaluation, we provide an agentic workflow GATE with five think-with-image tools and four knowledge-intensive tools, and release expert-annotated stepwise traces grounded in verifiable evidence for trajectory-level analysis. Experiments show that GATE outperforms direct inference and open-source agents, indicating that no-tool, search-only or image-only setups are insufficient. Gains come from coherent, level-specific tool-use plans rather than more tool calls, as they more reliably reach annotated key evidence steps and make fewer errors when integrating into the final decision. The GeoBrowse bernchmark and codes are provided in https://github.com/ornamentt/GeoBrowse

Xinyu Geng, Yanjing Xiao, Yuyang Zhang +5

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Tool-Using Vision-Language Agents Multimodal Tool Use Geospatial Reasoning

Mar 27, 2026

GISclaw: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Agent System for Realistic Multi-Step Geospatial Analysis

Most LLM-driven GIS assistants solve narrow single-step tasks tightly coupled to proprietary platforms such as ArcGIS or QGIS, limiting their use for the multi-step, cross-format pipelines that define professional geospatial analysis. We present GISclaw, a comprehensive open-source agent system that performs realistic GIS analysis end to end - spatial joins, raster algebra, kriging interpolation, machine-learning classification, network analysis, choropleth cartography - directly through Python with no commercial GIS dependency. GISclaw couples an LLM reasoning core with a persistent Python sandbox pre-loaded with the open-source geospatial stack, three engineered prompt rules (Schema Analysis, Package Constraint, Domain Knowledge Injection), and an Error-Memory module for self-correction. A single backend-agnostic architecture supports both cloud-API and locally deployed open-weight LLM backends, enabling air-gapped deployment without loss of capability. On GeoAnalystBench - 50 expert-curated multi-step tasks averaging 5.8 analytical steps across vector, raster, and tabular data - GISclaw reaches up to 100% task success and 97% mean success over three independent runs. We further conduct 1,800 controlled experiments (50 tasks x 6 backends x 2 architectures x 3 repeats) with bootstrap 95% CIs, paired Wilcoxon tests, and a composite-score sensitivity analysis (Kendall's tau median = 0.94), and introduce a three-layer evaluation protocol combining code structure, reasoning process, and type-specific output verification. The Single-Agent ReAct loop reliably outperforms the Dual-Agent Plan-Execute-Replan pipeline on every cloud backend (Cliff's delta = 0.15-0.41); only the locally deployed 14B model gains from multi-agent orchestration, suggesting architectural complexity should match model capability rather than be added by default.

Jinzhen Han, JinByeong Lee, Yuri Shim +2

Department of Civil, Architectural & Environment Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea · Ministry of the Interior and Safety, South Korea · School of Geography, University of Leeds, United Kingdom +1

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning LLM Agent Orchestration LLM Agent Evaluation

Mar 4, 2026

TimeSpot: Benchmarking Geo-Temporal Understanding in Vision-Language Models in Real-World Settings

Geo-temporal understanding, the ability to infer location, time, and contextual properties from visual input alone, underpins applications such as disaster management, traffic planning, embodied navigation, world modeling, and geography education. Although recent vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced image geo-localization using cues like landmarks and road signs, their ability to reason about temporal signals and physically grounded spatial cues remains limited. To address this gap, we introduce TimeSpot, a benchmark for evaluating real-world geo-temporal reasoning in VLMs. TimeSpot comprises 1,455 ground-level images from 80 countries and requires structured prediction of temporal attributes (season, month, time of day, daylight phase) and geographic attributes (continent, country, climate zone, environment type, latitude-longitude) directly from visual evidence. It also includes spatial-temporal reasoning tasks that test physical plausibility under real-world uncertainty. Evaluations of state-of-the-art open- and closed-source VLMs show low performance, particularly for temporal inference. While supervised fine-tuning yields improvements, results remain insufficient, highlighting the need for new methods to achieve robust, physically grounded geo-temporal understanding TimeSpot is available at: https://TimeSpot-GT.github.io.

Azmine Toushik Wasi, Shahriyar Zaman Ridoy, Koushik Ahamed Tonmoy +5

Computational Intelligence and Operations Laboratory (CIOL), Bangladesh · Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST), Sylhet, Bangladesh · North South University (NSU), Dhaka, Bangladesh +1

Spatiotemporal Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Geospatial Reasoning VLM Reasoning

Feb 19, 2026

OpenEarthAgent: A Unified Framework for Tool-Augmented Geospatial Agents

Recent progress in multimodal reasoning has enabled agents that interpret imagery, connect it with language, and execute structured analytical tasks. Extending these capabilities to remote sensing remains challenging, as models must reason over spatial scale, geographic structures, and multispectral indices while maintaining coherent multi-step logic. To address this gap, we introduce OpenEarthAgent, a unified framework for tool-augmented geospatial reasoning trained on satellite imagery, natural-language queries, and structured reasoning traces. Beyond serving as a benchmark, OpenEarthAgent establishes a cohesive agentic architecture built around a unified executable tool registry and trajectory-based policy learning. The framework standardizes heterogeneous visual, spectral, GIS, and georeferenced raster operations under a consistent callable schema, enabling modular orchestration and deterministic execution. Training is performed via supervised fine-tuning on structured reasoning trajectories with deterministic replay validation to ensure executability and spatial correctness. The accompanying corpus comprises 14,538 training and 1,169 evaluation instances with over 107K reasoning steps, spanning urban, environmental, disaster, and infrastructure domains and incorporating GIS operations alongside index analyses such as NDVI, NBR, and NDBI. Grounded in explicit reasoning traces, the learned agent demonstrates structured reasoning, stable spatial understanding, and interpretable tool-driven behaviour across diverse EO scenarios. We report consistent improvements over a strong baseline and competitive performance against recent open and closed-source models. Our code, data and trained models are publicly available: https://github.com/mbzuai-oryx/OpenEarthAgent

Akashah Shabbir, Muhammad Umer Sheikh, Muhammad Akhtar Munir +8

Mohamed bin Zayed University of AI, United Arab Emirates · IBM Research, Europe · Linköping University, Sweden +2

Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Remote Sensing Geospatial Reasoning Tool-Using Vision-Language Agents Visually Grounded Reasoning Spatial Reasoning

Feb 18, 2026

GPSBench: Do Large Language Models Understand GPS Coordinates?

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications that interact with the physical world, such as navigation, robotics, or mapping, making robust geospatial reasoning a critical capability. Despite that, LLMs' ability to reason about GPS coordinates and real-world geography remains underexplored. We introduce GPSBench, a dataset of 57,800 samples across 17 tasks for evaluating geospatial reasoning in LLMs, spanning geometric coordinate operations (e.g., distance and bearing computation) and reasoning that integrates coordinates with world knowledge. Focusing on intrinsic model capabilities rather than tool use, we evaluate 14 state-of-the-art LLMs and find that GPS reasoning remains challenging, with substantial variation across tasks: models are generally more reliable at real-world geographic reasoning than at geometric computations. Geographic knowledge degrades hierarchically, with strong country-level performance but weak city-level localization, while robustness to coordinate noise suggests genuine coordinate understanding rather than memorization. We further show that GPS-coordinate augmentation can improve in downstream geospatial tasks, and that finetuning induces trade-offs between gains in geometric computation and degradation in world knowledge. Our dataset and reproducible code are available at https://github.com/joey234/gpsbench

Thinh Hung Truong, Jey Han Lau, Jianzhong Qi

University of Melbourne.

Geospatial Reasoning Geospatial Reasoning Benchmarks Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Numerical Reasoning in Language Models