Heterogeneous Modeling Tools

Metacognition involves reasoning about cognitive processes themselves. An example is in resource allocation where we choose how much time and effort to put into a reasoning task before we begin based on our confidence. Current Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) cannot estimate their uncertainty about an output without first responding, and cannot dynamically allocate resources to producing an output, making this type of metacognitive process difficult. A recently proposed alternative to classic transformer architectures that addresses these two concerns is the Energy Based Model (EBM) which allows for interpretable uncertainty modeling and dynamic allocation of compute resources. While EBMs can allow for control of these two processes, the actual metacognitive task of determining compute allocation based on uncertainty is not directly addressed. Instance-Based Learning Theory (IBLT) provides an approach to modeling human-like decisions from experience that has previously been applied to predicting human metacognitive reasoning. In this paper we introduce a framework for MEtacognitive Reasoning with Instance-based Learning Theory and Energy Dynamics (MERITED). Grounded in IBLT, this framework allows for control of the computational effort allocated in an EBM to allow for metacognitive control over reasoning effort based on uncertainty while remaining computationally efficient. This work has two main contributions, the training and open weight sharing of a 191M parameter reasoning EBM, and an implementation of the MERITED framework for dynamic compute allocation using an IBL model.

The performance ceiling of an LLM team is constrained not only by individual model capabilities, but also by inter-member error resonance and predictive differences. Although heterogeneous teaming is often observed to be effective in practice, existing approaches lack complementarity metrics that are computable, interpretable, and optimizable, leaving team composition to rely on heuristics. We propose a heterogeneity-driven team selection framework that performs offline profiling to characterize individual capability along with two complementary signals: one captures decorrelation in error patterns to reduce co-failures, while the other measures divergence in predictive behavior to capture strategy diversity. We formulate team selection as a standardized quality--complementarity combinatorial objective and apply an efficient greedy search to select a small team from a candidate pool. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms quality-only baselines under controlled candidate pools and team sizes, establishing reusable selection principles for multi-LLM systems.

Federated knowledge must remain usable by recipients with different modalities, private architectures, and tasks. We present FedSocket, which makes recipient execution a design requirement of the exchanged model. A shared Q combines recipient-computable inputs, task-owned outputs, and ownership-aware aggregation, connecting heterogeneous private models through a common prediction interface. Private models teach local Q copies; the returned Q supports local learning and Joint inference, with only Q parameters and counts exchanged. Across six datasets, FedSocket improves missing-modality recipient accuracy over Local by 14.44 and 15.51 percentage points on MELD and UCF-51. Under matched inference capacity, Joint exceeds independent ensembles by 11.06 points in UCF-51 accuracy and 4.87 points in mean bidirectional Flickr30k R@1. Joint also improves over Q alone on all four heterogeneous endpoints, demonstrating the value of combining local and exchanged predictions. Teacher controls, sharing-path interventions, and component factorials identify the roles of supervision, sharing, and deployment. FedSocket makes exchanged knowledge directly usable from federated training to recipient inference.

Foundation segmenters such as SAM return several plausible masks for an unlabeled image, and a student trained on the wrong one inherits its errors. Choosing among them means querying a second large model or fitting a quality head to annotated masks. We show that a candidate can be judged by what it does to a frozen self-supervised backbone's features. Normalized DINOv2 patch features lie on a hypersphere, and a candidate mask splits that sphere in two. Based on this reading, we introduce SphereTrust, which scores each candidate by three properties of the split, the angular contrast between the two sides, the coverage of the foreground's appearance modes, and contact with the image frame, one for each of three common ways a mask fails, and ranks a pool in 0.55 s per image from the frozen features alone. On eight SAM and SAM3 candidate pools spanning camouflaged, salient, and dichotomous segmentation and camouflage under low light, SphereTrust exceeds the strongest evaluated external baseline on six pools by 1.7 to 9.3 percentage points in mean selected Dice. These comparisons include published selection rules and explicitly labeled adaptations of DSS and UCOD-MKD. On the two prompted camouflage pools, its mean selected Dice is within 0.1 percentage points of the candidate-derived DSS adaptation, with a lower catastrophic-error rate. Which cue carries the signal depends on the candidate pool. The same sphere also supports training. The leading candidates enter as a candidate set with their scores as priors, prototypes reorder them, and a cross-fitted second round completes the labels, raising weighted F by 4.5, 2.3, and 5.5 points over fixed-label training on the three MLLM anchor pools, with students competitive with published unsupervised methods on nineteen test sets.

No single Large Language Model (LLM) is uniformly reliable across queries, motivating multi-model inference systems that either route among models or combine their outputs. However, routing stops after selecting an initial model, while dense collaboration invokes peers on every query. We show that collaboration is non-monotonic: peers can recover failures that no model solves alone, but can also corrupt initially correct answers. We introduce COMED (Controlled Model Escalation for Multi-LLM Deliberation), a post-anchor controller for selective cross-model collaboration. COMED uses anchor self-consistency, router margin, and a lightweight peer probe to accept confident answers, verify ambiguous cases, and escalate only when collaboration is likely beneficial. We formalize this trade-off with a rescue-harm decomposition showing that selective collaboration improves when rescued errors outweigh collaboration-induced harms. Across medical, scientific, and general reasoning benchmarks, COMED improves fixed and routed anchors in all 16 open-weight settings, with gains up to +10.7 percentage points on MedQA while invoking fewer models and using fewer decoded tokens than dense collaboration. On HLE with frontier models, COMED improves GPT-5.5 from 23.1% to 28.1%, outperforming dense collaboration and achieving the best results.

Multi-agent Systems (MAS) combine multiple model outputs to solve complex reasoning tasks. However, despite rapid growth of available open-source models, there is limited research on how to select optimal model candidates out of this massive pool. We systematically evaluate 8 model selection strategies (including model size, accuracy and answer diversity) across before-generation (routing) and after-generation (majority-voting, LLM-as-a-judge) MAS architectures on challenging scientific benchmarks. Our findings show a significant gap between theoretical oracle potential and actual performance: Expanding candidate pool sizes often degrades performance below that of the top performing base-model. We find that candidate selection within a single model family is the strategy that yields the best relative performance over a standalone model. These results demonstrate that adding arbitrary models to a heterogeneous MAS can introduce system instability, highlighting model selection as a critical design choice for multi-agent systems.

Heterogeneous model collaboration seeks to exploit the complementary strengths of different models to balance predictive performance and inference cost. Existing approaches typically rely either on trained routers, which tie routing decisions to a fixed task and model pool, or on raw-confidence cascades, whose thresholds lack consistent reliability semantics across heterogeneous models. Consequently, these approaches adapt poorly to changing model pools and deployment budgets. We propose Calibration-Aware Uncertainty Cascades (CAUC), a simple post-hoc framework that independently calibrates each model's confidence and selects deployment policies using validation data. The resulting calibrated confidence scores establish a common reliability scale for accepting an early prediction, invoking a stronger model, or selectively combining model outputs. This unified decision criterion decouples deployment policies from any particular model pool or operating budget. We further show theoretically that calibration gives confidence thresholds an explicit selective-risk interpretation, whereas uncalibrated scores offer no comparable reliability guarantee. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, across six language benchmarks, CAUC achieves an average relative accuracy improvement of 1.9% over strong-model-only inference while avoiding approximately 47% of strong-model calls. On image classification benchmarks, it maintains or improves predictive performance while reducing measured GFLOPs by up to 57%.

Unified multimodal models jointly support understanding and generation, but incur substantial redundant computation across tokens, layers, and generation timesteps. Through token-importance probing, we identify an asymmetric core-expansion structure: understanding exhibits a stable importance component, while generation largely shares this component but requires progress-dependent corrections. We therefore propose CE-Router, which uses a task-shared core scorer and progress-conditioned generation expansions, optimized through generation decomposition and cross-task core alignment. At inference, CE-Router compacts token computation and supplies a learned routing signal to Unified Computation Scheduling, which coordinates layer skipping, FFN pruning, diffusion-head cache reuse, and denoising-step early exit. Experiments on two representative UMM architectures demonstrate consistent quality--efficiency improvements across both tasks, retaining 98.03% of dense understanding performance with a 1.93$\times$ end-to-end inference speedup.

Heterogeneous language-model ensembles expand the space of candidate responses, yet they lack a principled criterion for when a newly generated answer should supersede an already supported one. We decouple candidate headroom from replacement authority, rendering the latter as an explicit, auditable object. Our proposed method, Agreement-Before-Diversity (ABD), is a frozen, label-free decision rule: an anchor answer is retained if two additional trusted samples corroborate it under a fixed equivalence relation; otherwise, it is replaced by a heterogeneous synthesis. For this gating mechanism, we prove two exact identities. The first shows that the accuracy gap relative to unconditional synthesis is determined jointly by the agreement coverage and the anchor's advantage on the protected subset. The second shows that the gap relative to never synthesizing reflects a contrast between authorized recovery and authorized destruction. Neither identity assumes independence or calibrated confidence, and the expected inference cost is approximately eight minus five times the coverage in number of calls. Under blind, exact-ID evaluation, ABD achieves 59.43% on the complete LiveCodeBench-v6 (vs. 52.57% for Single9 and 52.00% for HAC; n = 175) and 75.00% on an untouched GPQA-Diamond split (both controls at 72.78%; n = 180). Furthermore, these identities localize every aggregate difference to an enumerable protected stratum: no discordant items occur among the 3 protected cases on LiveCodeBench, where coverage bounds the gate's contribution to 1.71 points a priori; 13 versus 8 discordant cases among 132 on GPQA-Diamond; and 12 versus 0 among 71 under a frozen anchor perturbation. Diversity supplies potential; verification structure supplies authority.

Sixteen language models drawn from ten families produced, on average, the semantic diversity of 1.69 distinct formulations of a psychotherapeutic case, against a single-model baseline of 1.43 from one model's own runs. Ensembles place more than one reading before a decision-maker on the premise that several models supply several perspectives. Dispersion over their outputs is measured both as diversity and as uncertainty, and both traditions validate it against a correctness criterion that this task does not admit. Measuring diversity is a solved problem: the Vendi Score, the exponential of the von Neumann entropy of a similarity matrix, is an effective number of distinct elements. What a single aggregate does not say is where the diversity comes from. We define a per-model dissent contribution, the complement of a model's mean similarity to the other members of its ensemble: a magnitude from the same matrix, not a decomposition of the spectral index, whose maximum identifies the most divergent voice. Crossing model and case, we test as a preregistered hypothesis whether model identity accounts for a non-zero share of the variance in dissent, and characterise the structure that test detects. The panel formulated fifteen stratified vignettes, yielding 7,082 formulations for analysis. Model identity was a detectable structuring factor of the dissent that remained, but the usual categories recovered it only partly: scale differences pointed in opposite directions across pairs, family grouped models on only five two-member lines, and the most divergent voice changed with panel composition, so that the surfaced outlier describes the ensemble rather than the model. Dissent did not track the interpretive openness for which the case bank was stratified; it was organised by clinical content instead, leaving the dispersion an ensemble produces a property to measure rather than assume.

Tabular data is the dominant structured-data modality, and learning table representations has become a core research direction. Table-level embeddings in particular underpin a wide range of applications, including table retrieval, data lake discovery, and table classification. Despite their importance, there is still limited understanding of how different embedding approaches behave across tasks, making systematic evaluation and analysis essential. In this work, we introduce a systematic evaluation of table-level embeddings that captures several complementary properties required for downstream effectiveness. We realize this evaluation by extending TEmBed, a recently proposed testbed for tabular embeddings, whose table-level coverage is currently limited to a single retrieval task. An empirical study over the TEmBed model pool confirms that no single model excels across all tasks, demonstrating that table-level embedding quality cannot be reduced to retrieval alone.

Interoperability between heterogeneous modeling tools remains a significant challenge in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), particularly in the automotive domain where multiple modeling languages, as well as defacto standard proprietary and open-source tools coexist. This paper presents an LLM-driven approach for automated model interoperability by considering two relevant aspects: 1) mapping model instances to a target metamodel 2) merging of metamodels. The proposed methodology is demonstrated through transformations involving Ecore and SysML v2 based metamodels and incorporates structural validation of generated model instances against user-defined target models. Automotive case studies illustrate the feasibility of the approach and show that large language models can significantly reduce manual transformation effort while generating structurally valid target models for cross-tool interoperability.

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in decision support, it is important to understand whether their choices under uncertainty exhibit stable and interpretable behavioural regularities. Human decision-making combines relatively persistent risk preferences with context-dependent adjustment, yet it remains unclear whether analogous behavioural structure can be observed in LLM-based decision systems. Here we examine this question using a controlled multi-model framework based on no-limit Texas Hold'em, where behaviour is quantified by Participation, measuring voluntary engagement in uncertain opportunities, and Proactiveness, measuring pre-flop risk escalation. Across homogeneous self-play and heterogeneous mixed-model interactions, frontier LLMs exhibit stable, model-specific risk profiles, forming a spectrum from conservative to aggressive decision styles. These profiles remain largely robust under changing opponent composition, while the most conservative and most aggressive models diverge further in mixed settings. Under global risk pressure and personal resource constraint, models adapt in structured but heterogeneous ways, ranging from broad behavioural contraction to selective de-escalation and near-invariant behaviour. These findings suggest that LLMs differ not only in baseline risk disposition, but also in the risk signals they respond to and the flexibility with which they adjust, providing a behavioural basis for auditing risk-sensitive decision-making in interactive settings. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/XuankunRong/AgentTexasPoker.

As foundation models grow in scale and diversity, coordinating multiple models into cooperative reasoning systems offers a path toward safer, more reliable AI. This chapter presents a multi-agent framework where solver models generate independent drafts, each undergoes structured critique and revision by a critic agent, and an aggregator agent synthesizes a final consensus solution. A scoring module provides semantic, numerical, and procedural evaluation across all agents. Through ablation studies on a benchmark spanning calculus, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, optimization, statistics, and mathematics, we isolate the contributions of framework architecture versus model diversity. We compare four configurations: (1) Individual Baseline, (2) Homogeneous Framework using one shared model, (3) Redundant Homogeneous Solvers using multiple instances of the same model, and (4) Heterogeneous Framework with diverse specialized models. Results show that while framework structure and redundant sampling yield modest gains, model heterogeneity is the critical factor driving substantial performance improvements. The heterogeneous configuration achieves superior step-wise accuracy (0.64 vs. 0.54 for individual models; 2.3x improvement over homogeneous configurations) with reduced variance across categories and difficulty levels. Step-wise reasoning quality (correctness of intermediate steps, not just final answers) improves dramatically only with model diversity, showing that heterogeneous agents provide complementary error detection and reasoning refinement essential for explainability and auditability. We discuss architectural principles, evaluation methodology, and implications for Global Applied AI, showing how heterogeneous multi-agent coordination supports transparent, auditable, high-confidence decision-making across scientific and industrial domains.

Multi-model LLM systems such as routing, voting, cascades, fusion, and mixture-of-agents are used to beat single-model accuracy. We show that their gain is capped by a quantity the field rarely reports. For any policy whose output is one member model answer, accuracy cannot exceed one minus beta, where beta is the rate at which every model is wrong on the same query. In contrast, the usual diagnostic, average pairwise error correlation rho, cannot identify beta: error laws with identical marginals and pairwise correlations can have different all-wrong rates. A Clopper-Pearson bound on beta gives a finite-sample certificate on the largest gain any router, vote, or cascade could deliver before training a router. Across 67 models from 21 providers, a tetrachoric-calibrated single-factor model still underprices the all-wrong tail: on open-ended mathematics, observed beta is 0.052 versus 0.023 under the full 67-model Gaussian copula, about 2.5 times underpricing, with 90 percent CI 1.7 to 3.4 and k equals 17. The effect recurs on execution-graded code, where beta is 0.079. Re-asking the same GPQA-Diamond questions in free-response rather than multiple-choice form reopens the tail, with beta 0.127 and a five-judge panel with kappa 0.73 to 0.92, locating co-failure in answer format rather than subject. At matched quality, low-rho heterogeneous ensembles beat high-rho Self-MoA, but on checkable tasks in our pool, combining models rarely beats the single best model without a strong query-level routing signal. Gains come from models failing on different questions, not from adding more models.

Production LLM deployments increasingly maintain heterogeneous model pools spanning order-of-magnitude cost differences. Existing routers make binary strong-vs-weak decisions and couple learned parameters to specific model identities, requiring retraining whenever the catalog changes. We present HyDRA (Hybrid Dynamic Routing Architecture), a framework that predicts fine-grained, multi-dimensional capability requirements per query and matches them against configuration-defined model profiles via shortfall matching. A ModernBERT encoder with K=4 independent sigmoid heads scores each query along reasoning, code generation, debugging, and tool use; a shortfall-matching algorithm then selects the cheapest model whose capabilities meet the predicted requirements. The deployed predictor runs at 86 ms median CPU inference latency in production, and is fully decoupled from the model catalog -- adding or removing models requires only a configuration change, with zero retraining. On SWE-Bench Verified (5-model pool: GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.3 Codex, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.4), HyDRA's tunable shortfall threshold spans three regimes: peak-quality exceeds the always-strong Claude Sonnet 4.6 baseline (75.4% vs. 74.2% resolution) at 12.9% cost savings; iso-quality matches Sonnet at 54.1% cost savings, a 6x improvement over our prior in-house binary router at 9.1%; aggressive pushes savings to 72.5% for a 3.2-point quality trade. Results generalize across LiveCodeBench, BigCodeBench, and tau-bench. HyDRA is deployed to all users in GitHub Copilot's VS Code Chat auto-mode and -- to our knowledge for the first time in the LLM routing literature -- demonstrates language-invariant routing across CJK, European, and other script families.

Industrial anomaly detection has attracted significant attention as a fundamental challenge in industrial systems. The rapid advancement of heterogeneous industrial sensors has driven industrial anomaly detection from unimodal to multimodal paradigms. However, existing methods are primarily designed for centralized and offline settings, overlooking the distributed and continuously generated data characteristic of real-world industrial environments. With the advancement of edge intelligence, modern edge devices are increasingly capable of not only data acquisition but also distributed model training, enabling collaborative intelligence across the system. Industrial anomaly detection represents a critical application in this context. Motivated by these challenges, we propose a novel framework termed Multimodal Online Distributed Industrial Anomaly Detection (MODIAD). We first present a comprehensive workflow for MODIAD and then formulate a Multi-class Intelligent Scheduling (MIS) problem to coordinate cross class model updates by balancing data sufficiency and class update frequency. To efficiently solve this problem, we design a Sequential Marginal Gain Greedy (SMG) algorithm that enables effective multi-class training under resource constraints. Furthermore, to improve the computational and communication efficiency during training, we propose an Resource Efficient Class-Wise Low Rank Adaptation (REC-LoRA) strategy, which significantly reduces system overhead while preserving detection performance. Extensive experiments on two representative multimodal industrial anomaly detection datasets, MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves superior performance and efficiency under the MODIAD scenario.

Can a committee of weak reasoning-model calls reach the performance of much stronger models? We study verifier-backed committee search as inference-time boosting for reasoning language models. The mechanism is not simply that ``more agents help'': samples expose latent correct solutions, while critics and comparators must recover them without access to the hidden verifier. We formalize this view by separating proposal coverage, local identifiability, progress, and diversity. We prove that coverage can be amplified by repeated sampling, but cannot by itself create useful critics or comparators; reliable amplification requires an additional local soundness signal, such as execution, proof checking, type checking, tests, or constraint solving. We give rank-based bounds showing when local selection errors compose into reliable trajectories, and characterize the proposer-side ceiling: oracle best-of-$k$ converges only to the mass of task slices on which the proposal system assigns nonzero useful probability. Empirically, on SWE-bench Verified, a single \texttt{GPT-5.4 nano} proposal solves $67.0\%$ of tasks. Using the same nano model, our critic--comparator orchestration reaches $76.4\%$ with $k=8$ proposals, matching the standalone performance of \texttt{Gemini 3 Pro} and \texttt{Claude Opus 4.5} Thinking and approaching the $79.0\%$ oracle best-of-$8$ upper bound. Thus, many correct patches are already present in weak-model proposal pools; the main challenge is selecting them. The remaining failures are mostly proposal-coverage failures, indicating shared blind spots that stronger selection alone cannot close.

Sparse MoE models achieve a good balance between capacity and compute by routing each token to a small subset of experts. However, in most MoE architectures, once a token is routed, the selected experts process it independently and their outputs are combined via a weighted sum. This leaves open whether enabling communication among them could improve performance. While prior work has raised this question, direct interaction among the active routed experts remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose SDG-MoE (Signed Debate Graph Mixture-of-Experts), a novel architecture that adds a lightweight, iterative deliberation step before final aggregation. SDG-MoE introduces three components: (i) two learned interaction matrices over the active experts, a support graph $A^+$ and a critique graph $A^-$, capturing reinforcing and corrective influences; (ii) a signed message-passing step that updates expert representations before aggregation; and (iii) a disagreement-gated Friedkin-Johnsen-style anchoring that controls deliberation strength while preventing expert drift. Together, these enable a structured deliberation process where interaction strength scales with disagreement and specialization is preserved. We also provide a theoretical analysis establishing stability conditions on expert states and showing that deliberation adds only low-order overhead over the active set. In controlled three-seed pretraining experiments, SDG-MoE improves validation perplexity over both an unsigned graph communication baseline and vanilla MoE, outperforming the strongest baseline by 19.8%, and gives the best external perplexity on WikiText-103, C4, and Paloma among the compared systems.

Cellular perturbation-response modeling requires coordinated choices of representations, fusion mechanisms, objectives, and training procedures. Large language models (LLMs) can propose executable candidates, but unconstrained revision can produce invalid implementations, change task semantics, or discard useful components. We present CellScientist, a protocol-constrained workflow that converts execution and validation feedback into auditable model-revision trajectories. It records design states and outcomes, routes discrepancies to specific components, and applies local revisions under a fixed task contract. A matched-budget study fixes the candidate language, predictor, fitting, and evaluator: structured revision finds better held-out predictors at small budgets under two LLM backbones. Operational audits link history to fewer repeated proposals, contract checks to contained violations, and discrepancy routing to targeted repairs. Refits of two frozen designs on an independently acquired cohort evaluate external predictive utility. Open-workflow trajectories retain improvements, regressions, and failures, while transcriptomic and single-cell searches extend application to additional response spaces. CellScientist produces both a selected predictor and an inspectable record of its development. Project page: https://limengran98.github.io/CellScientist/.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer high capacity with efficient inference cost by activating a small subset of expert models per input. However, deploying MoE models requires all experts to reside in memory, creating a gap between the resource used by activated experts and the provisioned resources. This underutilization is further pronounced in multi-tenant scenarios. In this paper, we propose FaaSMoE, a multi-tenant MoE serving architecture built on Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms. FaaSMoE decouples the control and execution planes of MoE by deploying experts as stateless FaaS functions, enabling on-demand and scale-to-zero expert invocation across tenants. FaaSMoE further supports configurable expert granularity within functions, trading off per-expert elasticity for reduced invocation overhead. We implement a prototype with an open-source edge-oriented FaaS platform and evaluate it using Qwen1.5-moe-2.7B under multi-tenant workloads. Compared to a full-model baseline, FaaSMoE uses less than one third of the resources, demonstrating a practical and resource-efficient path towards scalable MoE serving in a multi-tenant environment.

Modern enterprise AI applications increasingly rely on compound AI systems - architectures that compose multiple models, retrievers, and tools to accomplish complex tasks. Deploying such systems in production demands inference infrastructure that can efficiently serve concurrent, heterogeneous model invocations while maintaining cost-effectiveness and low latency. This paper presents a production deployment study of a modular, platform-agnostic inference architecture developed at Salesforce to support compound AI use cases including Agentforce (autonomous AI agents) and ApexGuru (AI-powered code analysis). The system integrates serverless execution, dynamic autoscaling, and MLOps pipelines to deliver consistent low-latency inference across multi-component agent workflows. We report production results demonstrating over 50% reduction in tail latency (P95), up to 3.9x throughput improvement, and 30 to 40% cost savings compared to prior static deployments. We further present a novel analysis of compound-system-specific challenges including multi-model fan-out overhead, cascading cold-start propagation, and heterogeneous scaling dynamics that emerge uniquely when serving agentic workloads. Through detailed case studies and operational lessons, we illustrate how the architecture enables compound AI systems to scale model invocations in parallel, handle bursty multi-agent workloads, and support rapid model iteration - capabilities essential for operationalizing agentic AI at enterprise scale.

Modern Deep Learning Recommendation Models (DLRMs) follow scaling laws with sequence length, driving the frontier toward ultra-long User Interaction History (UIH). However, the industry-standard "Fat Row" paradigm, which pre-materializes these sequences into every training example, creates a storage and I/O wall where data infrastructure usage exceeds GPU training capacity due to data redundancy that is amplified in multi-tenant environments where models with vastly different sequence length requirements share a union dataset. We present a \emph{versioned late materialization} paradigm that eliminates this redundancy by storing UIH once in a normalized, immutable tier and reconstructing sequences just-in-time during training via lightweight versioned pointers. The system ensures Online-to-Offline (O2O) consistency through a bifurcated protocol that prevents future leakage across both streaming and batch training, while a read-optimized immutable storage layer provides multi-dimensional projection pushdown for heterogeneous model tenants. Disaggregated data preprocessing with pipelined I/O prefetching and data-affinity optimizations masks the latency of training-time sequence reconstruction, keeping training throughput compute-bound by GPUs. Deployed on production DLRMs, the system reduces training data infrastructure resource usage while enabling aggressive sequence length scaling that delivers significant model quality gains, serving as the foundational data infrastructure for modern recommendation model architectures, including HSTU and ULTRA-HSTU.

Pipeline parallelism is widely used to train large language models (LLMs). However, increasing heterogeneity in model architectures exacerbates pipeline bubbles, thereby reducing training efficiency. Prior approaches typically optimize a single phase of the pipeline schedule (i.e., partitioning, placement, or scheduling), leaving substantial pipeline bubbles. While promising, co-optimization poses three key challenges: (1) complex performance modeling, (2) a combinatorial search space, and (3) irregular execution orders. To address these challenges, we propose OctoPipe, a pipeline parallelism system to jointly optimize partitioning, placement, and scheduling. First, we build a graph-based pipeline simulator to model heterogeneous pipeline execution for co-optimization. Second, on top of the simulator, we develop an iterative bubble-aware tuner to efficiently explore the combinatorial search space. Third, we implement a unified pipeline executor that dynamically orchestrates computation and communication to support irregular execution orders without deadlocks while maximizing communication-computation overlap. Experiments show that OctoPipe achieves 1.09--1.49$\times$ throughput improvement over the state-of-the-art pipeline parallelism approaches across various heterogeneous model configurations and GPU cluster scales.