Human-in-the-Loop Annotation

Many annotation projects begin before experts have a stable guideline or enough labels to train a task-specific model. We present Goldsmith, an agentic pipeline that turns a small gold set---expert-annotated calibration examples representing the intended task boundaries---into a reusable structured annotation definition. Goldsmith treats this definition as a trainable textual object. Candidate definitions are run on the same gold examples and scored with an executable structured loss, while the output schema, formatting, retrieval, repair, judging, and human review remain in an external harness. A large language model (LLM) editor converts the highest-loss failures into textual-gradient revisions, which are accepted only when the measured loss decreases. In prompt-optimization comparisons, Goldsmith improves over direct rewriting, OPRO, APE, and PromptBreeder under matched evaluation protocols. The resulting definition also improves downstream annotation when combined with retrieval, score-based routing, and human review across typed span, pair-level relation, and fixed-trigger event-argument tasks. These results show that scarce expert supervision can support both task-definition learning and scalable annotation.

While state-of-the-art automated models for medical image segmentation achieve high mean performance, they frequently suffer from localized, catastrophic failures that preclude safe clinical deployment, particularly in neuro-oncology. Interactive segmentation frameworks mitigate this by incorporating human oversight, but traditionally impose prohibitive cognitive and temporal workloads by requiring clinicians to manually search for errors. In this project, we present an efficient, Hybrid Structural-Aleatoric Human-in-the-Loop framework for glioma segmentation that bridges the gap between automated baseline performance and surgical-grade precision, achieving sub-2.0 mm HD95 on curated benchmarks while providing safety-net routing for structural failures across real-world clinical data. By extracting voxel-wise Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) uncertainty and applying hierarchical topological filtering, our method proactively isolates high-risk structural anomalies. We comprehensively evaluated our approach on a challenging out-of-distribution clinical stress-test cohort (N = 362). Operating under a simulated Human Oracle, the framework improved the Whole Tumor (WT) Dice score from 0.891 to 0.914 and reduced the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) from 5.82 mm to 4.76 mm. Critically for surgical safety, the system rescued severe boundary failures in the Tumor Core, reducing mean HD95 from 17.96 mm to 14.83 mm (improving absolute TC Dice to 0.356). These spatial rescues were achieved while demanding a median interactive workload of just 11.3% of the target volume. Acknowledging this as a simulated upper bound lacking real-world cognitive friction, the framework nevertheless demonstrates a highly Pareto-efficient pathway for safely deploying clinical AI.

Multi-turn visual search agents answer questions about high-resolution images by iteratively deciding where to look. Reinforcement learning for these agents rewards only the final answer, leaving the search process unsupervised. Consequently, faulty routes in which the reasoning process is erroneous yet the final result is correct arise frequently, which in turn leads to ineffective training, i.e., scaling along the wrong paths. In this paper, we introduce HaPRL, the first framework to reinforce the search process with human search behavior. We first build an annotation platform and collect 1K+ human-annotated data with fine-grained behavioral signals. During training, a carefully designed judge scores each rollout with task-adaptive weights, anchored on the distilled trace of how a human annotator actually searched the same image. Extensive experiments show that HaPRL consistently outperforms outcome-based RL, and early-stage process supervision yields 6.7x more improvement in subsequent outcome-based scaling. Our results also demonstrate the importance of aligning model behavior with human process annotation signals, which offer new insight into the training of foundation models.

Structured span annotations, such as quantities with their units, uncertainty modifiers, and event classes, are expensive to create and hard to keep trustworthy once language models enter the loop. We present QuanReview, an open-source system for auditing and correcting such annotation layers. QuanReview aligns two annotation streams over the same documents at character level, resolves unambiguous cases by an explicit and logged policy, and routes candidate conflicts to a browser-based adjudication interface where reviewers accept either side, build field-level hybrids, or flag items for re-annotation. A campaign manager assigns documents to multiple annotators with configurable redundancy, computes agreement at document and span level, auto-merges unanimous documents, and exports the corrected layer in the original file format, so that it can replace the original annotation files directly. Applied to a 4,457-record humanitarian benchmark and an LLM extraction stream, the system fully auto-merged 8% of documents, applied automatic policy decisions to a further 1,513 records, and concentrated human attention on 3,131 candidate conflicts, a mean of 5.4 per reviewed document.

Real-world perception systems must adapt to changing environments, but manual image annotation cannot scale to field data volumes. We present BirdsEye, which shifts expert annotation from images to the field: an operator records target locations in world coordinates using RTK positioning and calibrated projective geometry propagates each observation to all frames where the target is visible. To quantify how well physical annotations align with image observations, we derive a first-order mapping from camera-pose uncertainty to pixel uncertainty and validate it against Monte Carlo simulation. This mapping is linear in the six per-axis pose variances, so it inverts into a sensor design tool: we give a sufficient condition converting an annotation tolerance into a convex set of admissible pose-noise budgets, a closed-form largest admissible scaling of a deployed sensor suite, and a unique per-axis pose specification under an equal-budget-share allocation. We also analyze the planar-surface approximation underlying the projection, which holds up to 10 degrees of terrain slope. By direct measurement, we show that system projection accuracy is sub-decimeter (sub-30 pixel) at AGL altitudes of 10-20m under conditions excluding sustained yawing. During an in-field case study across three agricultural sites, two field workers produced 12,524 annotated frames carrying 55,600 labels in roughly 12 hours (25.5x per-worker rate increase over manual labeling). Detectors trained on imagery collected by this workflow recovered 56-89% of in-view surveyed targets at a geographically distinct farm, at pre-registered operating points; human review of the leading configuration estimates detection precision at 83-87%, spanning three tie-break conventions for clusters carrying contradictory human verdicts.

Video provides a rich record of human behavior, interaction, and situated contexts, offering important evidence for understanding people and conducting human-centered research. As vision-language models (VLMs) become increasingly capable of analyzing video, they offer opportunities to automate this traditionally human-intensive process. Yet a central question remains: when can VLMs analyze human-centered video independently, and when does reliable analysis still require human involvement? To address this question, we first characterize video analysis practices in human-centered research. We systematically analyze all 1,702 CHI 2026 full papers and identify 125 that annotate videos. Through iterative coding, we derive a five-dimensional taxonomy spanning analytic purpose, viewpoint, phenomenon, reasoning requirement, and annotation authority. Grounded in recurring annotation tasks captured by this taxonomy, we construct a benchmark of 15 representative tasks from open datasets to map the capabilities and limitations of a general-purpose VLM. We examine the division of labor between humans and VLMs by comparing three annotation workflows: VLM alone, human alone, and human verification of VLM outputs. Across tasks, VLM-alone annotation approaches human accuracy on average (HNS = 97.0, where 100 denotes human-alone performance), demonstrating substantial potential to automate human-centered video analysis. Human verification achieves the highest accuracy (HNS = 121.5) while reducing human annotation time by 48.9% and monetary cost by 31.3%-44.5% relative to human-alone annotation. Our findings connect real-world human-centered video analysis tasks and current VLM capabilities, and clarify how human-AI collaboration can make VLM-assisted analysis reliable and efficient.

Large-scale text annotation brings expert insight to millions of documents, often through a codebook that AI annotators follow. Developing a robust codebook, however, takes months. Large language models (LLMs) could speed this process by applying an early codebook to the data, surfacing cases with strong LLM disagreement, and eliciting expert feedback to address them. We examined three ways experts can provide feedback for LLM codebook revision: (i) editing LLM-generated revisions driven by cross-LLM disagreement (Codebook Verifying), (ii) answering questions about LLM disagreements (Question Answering), and (iii) labeling disagreement cases with rationales (Rationale Labeling). Experiments on thousands of tutoring-session transcripts show that Rationale Labeling yielded the highest LLM-labeling accuracy (64.9%) against expert labels, outperforming the expert-revised codebook (57.8%). The best Question Answering setting also outperformed it (60.5%). Our work shows that LLMs can be used to strategically target expert attention, shortening months of codebook revision to days without sacrificing labeling performance.

Offline reinforcement learning and off-policy evaluation evaluates dynamic treatment rules based on retrospectively collected data prior to deployment. In recent AI applications, state and reward information is recorded as complex text or image, which recent AI advancements such as LLM-as-a-judge can label with unknown bias. Expert annotation may be available but at a higher cost. For example, safety classification via cheap but imperfect classifiers vs. expensive expert review. We show how a limited budget for ground-truth data-annotation can be used via doubly-robust OPE with missing rewards, and we optimize variance-optimal annotation probabilities for sequential off-policy evaluation, where the target policy value is estimated from annotated data. We characterize the optimal annotation probabilities for sequential forward-monotone annotation protocols, and provide a feasible batch-adaptive implementation. Our work is motivated by a collaboration with a homelessness services nonprofit that writes casenotes for individuals over time. Our method can be used to unlock trustworthy inference from casenote data and answer new inferential questions such as: how does expanding outreach effort over time affect progress towards a housing application and improvement in housing placement? In simulations and on two real datasets - casenotes from the nonprofit and human-preference votes from LMArena - we see reductions in RMSE of 34-65% for housing placement and 17-68% for progress towards a housing application at budgets of 40% of full annotation and above, and by 55-62% at every budget on LMArena.

Human feedback can vary in cost and informativeness. Strong feedback can reveal severe errors but is costly, so cheaper quality ratings can help decide which items to annotate. We propose MICRO (Multi-Fidelity Impact Clustered Rollout), an active search framework that allocates a shared budget to these feedback types to maximise confirmed severe error discoveries. MICRO jointly models ratings and annotation losses conditional on item features to steer acquisition. It clusters acquisitions by their predicted impact on severity probabilities to select diverse candidates, then uses rollout to estimate their discovery value. Experiments on WMT20 English-German show that ratings improve both loss reconstruction and severity prediction. MICRO achieves the highest mean discovery count across four budget and rating cost settings, with similar performance to adapted MF-ENS in one and significant gains over all six comparison policies, including two rollout controls, in the other three $(p<.001)$.

Training data quantity and quality greatly affect object detection model performance, regardless of model architecture. For object detection in deep-sea video and imagery, where the objects of interest (primarily organisms) are sparse, faint, and hard to identify, incremental improvements to detector performance may require an iterative approach to data labeling and management. This paper presents mbariml, a Python-based video and image analysis pipeline built around the data labeling and management process. mbariml uses an Ultralytics YOLO detection model, runs it over still images or video, stores every detection as a reviewable region of interest, groups those regions by visual similarity so that a human can accept or reject them in bulk, and exports the result as training data, statistics, image sidecars, and additional metadata. Existing YOLO and Pascal VOC datasets can be imported into the same database, so a legacy training set can be reviewed, extended, and re-exported alongside new detections. The human review stage is the center of the design: an annotator can validate, relabel, resize, delete, and draw entirely new localizations, optionally assisted by the SAM3 segmentation model, and every one of those edits is written back to the same database the detector wrote to. Video receives particular attention: the software treats each tracker-produced track as a provisional observation and selects one representative frame instead of retaining every detection in the track. We describe the pipeline stage by stage, including how each track's representative frame is chosen (from a user-selected third of the track, the middle by default), which we examine on 684 tracks from seafloor video.

We present onPanda, an interactive tool for efficiently annotating LLM alignment data and agent trajectories. onPanda adopts token-level correction as its core interaction: while reading a model response, the annotator locates the first inappropriate token and either picks a substitute from the model's candidate tokens or types the correct text via free-form editing. The system then truncates everything after that position and continues generation from the corrected prefix, repeating this locate-correct-continue loop until a satisfactory response is obtained. This mechanism lets annotators precisely steer model outputs at low cost: a small controlled study suggests that onPanda reduces median annotation time by 52% over manual post-editing. Since the vast majority of tokens in the final response are generated by the model itself, the resulting data largely preserves the model's sampling distribution and is well suited for constructing on-policy SFT and preference data. Furthermore, the token-level corrections recorded during annotation provide fine-grained supervision with precise positions and naturally paired positive--negative samples. onPanda also connects to external tools and harnesses, enabling interactive trajectory annotation in realistic environments. In addition, we release Panda-CVL, a dataset annotated with onPanda, together with a benchmark for token-level correction.

Annotating large radiology datasets is bottlenecked by the manual effort of delineating structures slice-by-slice in 3D volumes. Interactive methods reduce this effort but stay interaction-inefficient: slice-wise methods (including many foundation models) ignore inter-slice continuity, while 3D and video-based methods propagate a prompt with a \emph{fixed} propagator that never adapts to the target volume, so it drifts on low-contrast or pathological structures and must be re-prompted. We present IMVS, a human-in-the-loop annotation framework that composes three components into a closed loop rather than a new segmentation primitive: a lightweight 2D Slice Mask Adapter (SMA) fine-tuned online from user scribbles, a frozen Volume Mask Tracker (VMT) that propagates corrected masks across adjacent slices, and a soft teacher--student alignment that limits forgetting. The SMA is backbone-agnostic (UNet++, DeepLabV3, TransUNet). Across 8 public CT/MRI datasets, IMVS matches strong interactive baselines in quality while sharply cutting annotation effort: $14.4\times$ faster than a proficient copy-based manual workflow ($22.3\times$ over naive manual), $4.6\times$ over slice-wise and $1.9\times$ over 3D interactive methods. MedSAM2 and ScribblePrompt stay competitive or stronger on well-delineated organs; IMVS's advantage is largest on challenging targets and on interaction efficiency. Source code and Demo Video: https://github.com/AbhilakshSinghReen/imvs.

Checking Quran recitation from an ASR transcript requires distinguishing unresolved mistakes from repetitions, repairs, opening formulas and accepted spelling differences. We report a completed human annotation of 100 production recording cases: 348 scored units and 162 localized events across ten combined labels. An executable evaluator scores labels and word positions together. A plain diff reaches label-aware F1 0.525 and localization F1 0.826; adapted production cleaner/alignment components reach 0.518 and 0.786, with exact-span F1 0.505 for both. Correcting the adapter's word coordinates recovers all five annotated repetition events, showing why annotation interfaces must be checked before interpreting baseline failures. In a preliminary pilot, eight single 20-minute runs across three coding agents and eight models span label-aware F1 0.143 to 0.892: seven land far above every baseline, and one collapses below the naive diff from a missing normalization step. Across the six, 970 of 972 gold-event instances draw an overlapping prediction, so what remains is not detection but convention: span extent, and the labels whose boundary is stipulated by adjudication rather than visible in the text. Seven of 162 events defeat all six same-day runs, five of them one orthographic rule, and the strongest run still misses the same ones. No run annotated before building, so the pilot measures the algorithm half of the task only.

Multimedia applications require precise music annotation-labeled positions, segments, or loops-placed by hand or algorithmically. Machine-learning algorithms are scalable and effective but need annotated training data, scarce for many tasks. TimeCues Studio is an open-source workspace where algorithm-development teams annotate a music corpus, compare detection algorithms against those annotations, and prototype new ones. Unlike existing tools built for a single track at a time, TimeCues targets teams annotating whole collections, tightly integrated with algorithm development. Annotators place several marker types-each supporting ambiguity-aware labeling-on a grid-locked timeline that visualizes many music features, including separated audio stems. The same timeline drives an algorithm-comparison engine with bundled baselines, a Python sandbox for prototyping new models, and an ambiguity-aware evaluator that honors the structured fields. The same visualization suits solo annotators on music-sync projects. TimeCues is MIT-licensed and deploys via one Docker Compose command.

Understanding the frequency of factual errors in chatbot-generated text and evaluating systems that detect these errors is critical for determining chatbot safety. Yet factual-error detection is often treated as a single-pass, single-annotator labeling problem. In long-form chatbot responses, factual errors can be subtle and embedded within mostly correct text. We develop a multi-perspective annotation study of medically relevant chatbot responses, combining first-pass annotation, LLM-as-a-Judge (LaJ) candidate discovery, and two forms of adjudication: medical-expert and evidence-based fact-checking. First-pass annotators frequently miss factual errors later validated by adjudicators. LaJ improves candidate discovery, but is insufficient on its own: It misses factual errors that annotators catch. We also find disagreement among adjudicators, suggesting that adjudication over multiple candidate sources can improve benchmark completeness, but does not eliminate the need to apply judgment and expertise. Applied to an existing benchmark, this technique reveals a similar pattern of missing annotations. Together, these results suggest that in the settings examined here, single-pass hallucination benchmarks may achieve scale at the cost of undercounting factual errors. Multi-pass adjudication can improve coverage, but inferences drawn from the benchmarks are still sensitive to the judgment, expertise, and evidence used to determine error presence.

Labelling vision datasets, especially for segmentation tasks, is a laborious and costly process that stymies novel developments in agricultural robotics. In this paper, we present DropClick, a click-guided segmentation tool that simplifies the annotation process. Our system utilises single-click inputs on objects to generate pseudo-labels, which can replace manual annotations. DropClick stands out as it is a semi-automated approach and does not require a click for every object in the scene. It can therefore further reduce the required amount of user input drastically. We evaluate our method on two challenging agricultural robotic datasets, SB20 and BUP20 for plant and fruit segmentation, respectively. DropClick is first trained on a small subset of just 5 images from the original training data. This DropClick model can then be deployed as a one-click segmentation system and achieves comparable or higher performance than other one-click methods achieving an mIoU of 70.0 and 72.6 points, for SB20 and BUP20 respectively. DropClick then excels at maintaining high performance when clicks are not given (e.g. dropped); when 50% of the clicks are missing it still maintains an mIoU of 68.9 and 71.3 points, for SB20 and BUP20 respectively. We validate DropClick as a pseudo-labelling approach by taking its outputs to train a Mask2Former instance-based segmentation model in a semi-supervised manner. In this process, partially removing user input from DropClick yields similar high performance when compared to providing all clicks, at 70.1 vs 70.7 points AP50 for SB20 and no difference for BUP20 at 77.0 for both models; at the same time saving 46.3% of total input for SB20 and 31.9% for BUP20.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to annotate structured product data in e-commerce, but early deployment often begins as a cold-start problem: only limited pre-launch labels are available, the value of expensive reasoning is unknown, and human review is needed before the system can be trusted at scale. This challenge is especially common in rule-based annotation workflows, where each item must satisfy multiple business rules and both model errors and ambiguous rule boundaries affect final decisions. We introduce the Differential Reasoning Router (DRR), a cost-aware framework for cold-start LLM annotation that jointly optimizes model selection and human escalation. Rather than treating a reasoning model as a default fallback, DRR estimates separate success probabilities for a direct model and a reasoning model at both the sample and business-rule levels, enabling adaptive routing: easy cases are handled directly, reasoning is reserved for cases where it is expected to improve the decision, and likely double-failure or rule-disagreement cases are escalated to human annotators. The resulting labels provide targeted ground truth for prompt engineering, supervised fine-tuning, calibration, and rule refinement, enabling a gradual shift from human-heavy cold-start annotation toward high-confidence automated routing. In a production e-commerce workflow, DRR reaches accuracy parity with the strongest confidence-based router while achieving more than 60% reasoning-token cost savings.

Deploying robot fleets in complex, real-world environments requires human operators to supervise multiple robots simultaneously. Managing operator attention is a fundamental challenge of designing multi-robot supervision interfaces, encompassing both feed layout and feed content (i.e., robot behavior design). Thus far, designers lack empirical guidance on the latter-how to change a robot's behavior to capture, sustain, or relinquish operator attention during multi-robot supervision. In our vision of the future, designers should be able to use this guidance to calibrate robot behavior to different operator attention profiles. Treating operator eye gaze as a robot behavior design clue, we created a pre-deployment elicitation tool called Attune. Attune automatically identifies when meaningful gaze shifts occur, provides AI assistance for annotating why shifts occurred, and outputs a summary of operator gaze patterns for operator review. We evaluated Attune through a user study in which participants annotated the visual triggers that drew their attention. Our findings unveil variation in observed gaze patterns and reveal how Attune helps characterize operator attention.

Sleep stage classification is important for the diagnosis and management of sleep disorders, yet most automatic staging studies evaluate models against a single reference hypnogram despite known inter-scorer variability. This study investigates whether multi-scored datasets can be used to construct more reliable reference labels from the collective behavior of multiple experts. We use the publicly available DOD-H and DOD-O datasets. EEG (C3-M2) and chin EMG signals were segmented into 30-s epochs, and 30 features were extracted from each modality, yielding 60 features for EEG+EMG. We propose a learning-based hypnogram (LBH) that models the stage-specific behavior of each scorer using confusion matrices derived from machine-learning models. After column normalization, these matrices estimate the probability of each true sleep stage given each scorer's label; probabilities are aggregated across scorers to assign the final label for each epoch. LBH was evaluated with random forest, support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron classifiers under EEG-only and EEG+EMG settings, and compared with the dataset hypnogram (DH) and best-scorer hypnogram (BSH). LBH consistently improved overall performance. The best results were obtained with random forest and EEG+EMG, reaching 86.07% accuracy, 85.46% precision, and 85.29% F1-score on DOD-H, and 86.04% accuracy, 85.21% precision, and 84.70% F1-score on DOD-O. These findings suggest that personalized scorer modeling can improve reference hypnogram construction without discarding information from individual experts.

Accurate vector mapping of buildings and walls is critical for geospatial applications but remains a labor-intensive process. While recent deep learning methods have improved automatic extraction, in order to meet cartographic standards they always require a human to perform quality control and fix complex cases in the extraction. We present Click2Poly, a human-in-the-loop AI assistant designed to speed up this manual step. Extending the Florence-2 Vision Language Model (VLM), Click2Poly responds to user clicks by editing the building or wall vector layer directly. Implemented as a QGIS plugin, Click2Poly speeds up the manual editing of building and wall vector layers in a real-world production environment.

Medical data, by its nature, exhibit a high degree of heterogeneity on multiple levels ranging from (a) different modalities like images, text and time series, (b) diverse tabular schemata introduced by institutions and (c) completely unstructured textual information data provided by healthcare professionals. Data lakes are often used in medical data storage to consolidate all heterogeneous diverse data in a single, central location, where it can be saved "as is", without the need to impose a schema like a data warehouse does. Despite their flexibility, though, data lakes are notorious for the "data swamp" failure. Thus, providing a reliable data harmonization mechanism through metadata, without compromising integrity or flexibility, is a real challenge. To this end, knowledge graphs have attracted attention since they provide a dynamic way to depict relationships without a rigid schema-on-write approach. Additionally, another rigorous task relies on the interoperability of data: application of appropriate ML techniques on such a diverse nature of data is not an easy task, as a domain expert must decide the efficacy of a method to a specific data type or dataset. Metadata annotation can aid by tagging applicable operations, however this requires manual intervention, not to mention the plethora of existing datasets which lack such information. To tackle both challenges, in this paper, we propose a semantic data lake architecture that promotes data harmonization and incorporates a generative annotation process (i.e. LLMs) of non-labeled metadata collections to support the application of meaningful ML techniques. Building on top of this approach, we create a higher level of knowledge, identifying suitability of data with respect to applicable ML operations based on their data nature...

Automated anomaly detection methods often report strong performance on curated academic benchmarks, but their behavior under real-world industrial conditions is less clear. In this work, we evaluate 19 unsupervised anomaly detection models on the BowTie dataset, a challenging manufacturing dataset with reflective surfaces, subtle defects, and profile-specific variation. In contrast to benchmark results, we observe that model performance is less stable than typically reported on standard benchmarks such as MVTec AD, highly sensitive to preprocessing, and inconsistent across conditions, with no single approach emerging as uniformly robust; a consensus audit further indicates that nominal-data quality affects deployment. Motivated by these findings, we developed and initially deployed a unified human-in-the-loop framework for manufactured-part inspection that combines image annotation, AI-assisted defect detection, and an integrated validation engine, replacing a prior manual visual inspection and documentation workflow. The system supports heatmap-guided defect review, SAM-refined candidate regions for inspector acceptance, rejection, or boundary adjustment, mask evaluation where annotations exist, and review history for inspector consistency and onboarding. Together, the results highlight the gap between benchmark performance and deployment reality, and provide a practical framework for addressing it.

High-quality annotation of artworks is essential for computational art research, yet extracting implicit semantics remains challenging due to the reliance on culturally grounded meanings and deep contextual knowledge behind the images. Current AI-assisted annotation tools often lack assistance or rely on one-way workflows where experts have to perform extra manual calibrations to improve AI models, resulting in limited efficiency. To address this, we propose Bidirectional Human-AI Augmentation(BiHAA), a closed-loop framework in which skills and domain knowledge base evolve through real-time interaction and bidirectional HAI augmentation. Informed by a formative study with 20 artwork annotators from different backgrounds, we implement this framework in ArtAnno, an artwork annotation system driven by a multi-agent architecture. The system includes a Proactive Agentic Support Module, where AI augments humans through semantic mining and label suggestion, and an Interaction-Driven Evolution Module, where human expertise continuously enhances the AI through distilling annotation trajectories into reusable experience. Evaluation through a user study and two case studies demonstrates that our framework and system improve annotation efficiency, enable knowledge accumulation, and reduce the effort of information seeking and verification for annotators with limited domain expertise. We conclude by discussing broader implications and future directions.

Fine-grained wildlife classification in aerial imagery is limited not only by model performance, but also by unreliable labels: animals occupy few pixels, key visual cues vary seasonally, and modality-specific evidence can be ambiguous. We study adult-male identification in red deer ($\textit{Cervus elaphus}$), where the antler cycle defines predictable windows of reliable evidence for both annotation and prediction. Using 7,295 RGB-only, thermal-only, and matched RGB+thermal crop sets from low-altitude UAV surveys, labeled by three annotators, we show that seasonal structure links (I) annotation quality, (II) downstream classification, and (III) selective prediction. Matched RGB+thermal review resolves more samples than either single modality, recovering majority-male labels otherwise missed by RGB or thermal alone, in human-based as well as model-based classification. Months with high annotator abstention also show lower classifier confidence, and soft seasonal priors mainly benefit the season-limited thermal view. Uncertainty-band abstention further raises covered accuracy to 98.9%, though at reduced coverage and with deferral that falls disproportionately on males. Overall, a biologically grounded seasonal calendar predicts where annotation and prediction are unreliable, and can guide both annotation protocol design and modality weighting.

Qualitative researchers increasingly encounter interaction corpora whose scale exceeds what manual coding alone can address, and large language models (LLMs) are frequently proposed as analytic assistants. The open questions are not whether LLMs can participate in qualitative analysis but to what extent, in what phases, and under what safeguards. This article provides a detailed procedural account of a multi-phase human-LLM collaborative pipeline that adapted open, axial, and selective coding to develop a hierarchical codebook from 45,000 messages exchanged between K-12 educators and a generative AI platform. Across three phases, LLMs generated candidate labels and structured annotations at scale, while human researchers retained conceptual authority over category definitions, merging decisions, and interpretive frameworks. The resulting instrument was then tested through systematic human coding, in which three trained coders with educational domain expertise applied the codebook to an independent sample of 2,560 messages, established reliability through iterative calibration using set-valued agreement measures appropriate for multi-label annotation, and extended the instrument with five codes that the LLM-assisted phases had not surfaced. The final codebook comprises 72 items within 19 categories and six domains. We reflect on the methodological decisions the pipeline required, including the choice of a conversational unit of analysis, the treatment of the LLM as a labeling instrument rather than an interpretive agent, the measurement of intercoder agreement under multi-label coding, and the conditions under which human domain expertise remained decisive. The account is offered as an auditable template for qualitative researchers considering LLM assistance in codebook development while preserving human interpretive authority.

In this paper, we draw a comparison between linguists in training, a trained linguist, and annotations generated by large language models (LLMs) to find out if they struggle with complex linguistic phenomena in a similar way. For this purpose, we analyse evaluative language in spoken popular science discourse, with the example of a corpus of English TED talk transcripts. We focus on the Appraisal theory and its Attitude subsystem, including the categories (classes) of Affect, Judgement, and Appreciation. In this context, Appraisal theory is an example of a highly subjective annotation task, making it a suitable example for the study of complex annotation challenges. First, we assess human annotations on a sentence level in specific scientific domains. Then, we develop three prompts and compare them for model performance for the automatic classification of Appraisal classes. We assess the performance of three LLMs using the best-performing prompt and finetune the model, reaching an F1-score of 0.77. We find that models perform best compared to annotations conducted by the trained linguist, while linguists in training do not reach high agreement scores. We conclude that LLMs can aid in complex annotation task resolution, opening new pathways for the complex theories annotated and analyzed in digital humanities studies.

In this paper, we mainly concentrate on finding concepts or topics from the legal case proceedings, since adopting a structured representation for legal documents, as opposed to a mere bag-of-words flat text representation, can significantly enhance processing capabilities. To achieve this objective, we put forward a set of diverse concepts for legal case proceedings. With this motivation, we propose LeDA, a system for Legal Data Annotation. The system offers the generic functionality of annotating and adjudicating entities or concepts within documents via a web-based interface. A novel feature of our system is that it allows to dynamic create new tags for annotation, which is a particularly useful provision for situations where there exists no pre-defined ontology for the entities (concepts) that need to be annotated - these being rather discovered by annotators as they continue examining more documents. The system that we demonstrate is currently in use to annotate a set of concepts from legal documents to construct semantic representations of documents as bags of concepts that can then be used for several downstream tasks, such as prior case retrieval, judgment prediction, and so on. Along with the system features in general, we also describe how LeDA was used by 3 assessors to annotate and adjudicate legal concept names from Indian Supreme Court case proceedings.

Current human evaluation of machine translation typically assesses single outputs in isolation, a paradigm that suffers from high annotator noise and cost. We introduce Contrastive Error Span Annotation (cESA), a protocol that presents multiple translations of the source input (text, video, audio, image). In cESA, the annotator sees multiple translations of the same document, marks major and minor error spans, and then assigns a score from 0% to 100% on absolute scale. By allowing annotators to access the shared context across multiple outputs, cESA facilitates more consistent and efficient judgments. We validate cESA using a large-scale human evaluation of English->Japanese translations of 12 models, demonstrating reductions in annotation time and noise compared to standard pointwise evaluation. Unlike existing contrastive ranking methods, cESA yields absolute quality judgments that enable simple, interpretable non-parametric model rankings without the need for post-hoc corrections.

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is useful for material discrimination, but operational mine screening also depends on how many false alarms must be inspected before targets are found. This paper studies PFM-1 landmine detection in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) visible and near-infrared (VNIR) HSI using spectral angle mapper (SAM), matched filter (MF), adaptive coherence estimator (ACE), and constrained energy minimization (CEM). We compare a ground-measured SVC signature, a fully informed in-scene core-pixel signature, and a simulated human-in-the-loop signature bootstrap. Besides receiver operating characteristic area under the curve and average precision, we report target-discovery curves and spatial candidate-review counts. Full-review bootstrapping reaches the fully informed in-scene signature case after all seven target regions are verified, but the required inspection effort varies strongly: ACE confirms all regions in two rounds and nine candidate inspections, whereas the SAM variants need thousands of candidate reviews for their final target locations. Code is available at https://github.com/SagarLekhak/IEEE_WHISPERS_2026_UAV_HSI_PFM1.

The rapid growth of biomedical knowledge has made the validation of automatically generated biological annotations a major bottleneck in biomedical curation. While computational methods can rapidly produce large numbers of candidate annotations, determining which are biologically valid still requires costly expert review. Prioritizing these candidates before manual curation has therefore become a fundamental challenge. Machine learning techniques can support this process by exploiting biomedical knowledge graphs (bioKGs), which capture biological entities and their functional associations. In this work, we propose a framework that leverages bioKGs to estimate the plausibility of candidate annotations and guide expert curation. Starting from knowledge graph embeddings, we train relation-specific binary classifiers using a community-based negative sampling strategy to obtain reliable confidence estimates. We then introduce a family of plausibility measures that combine classifier confidence, classifier reliability, and the semantic context provided by alternative relationships involving the same pair of biological entities. Unlike conventional confidence estimation, the proposed approach explicitly accounts for multiple biologically meaningful relations that may coexist between the same entities. Experimental results on five large bioKGs demonstrate that the proposed negative sampling strategy consistently improves classifier robustness, increasing balanced accuracy by an average of 5.8%. Moreover, the plausibility measures outperform classifier confidence alone, enabling more effective prioritization of candidate annotations for expert review. Overall, our results show that the use of bioKGs improves the efficiency of AI-assisted biomedical curation while preserving expert control over the final annotation assessment.