Intrinsic Motivation

This article presents a mathematical model of the Motivated Emotional Mind cognitive architecture developed for embodied intelligent systems. Such a system learns to maintain its homeostasis through a generalized form of reinforcement learning based on its internal motivations, termed motivated learning (ML). The principal contribution of this article is a rigorous formalization of the re-entrant loop integrating feedforward processing, lateral interactions, and feedback pathways, together with the representational selection mechanisms that govern adaptive system responses. The model specifies how ongoing exteroceptive and interoceptive signals, bodily-motivational context, and memory traces are bound into associative memory structures termed semblions, which compete for access to further processing and top-down reconstruction. The formalization encompasses secondary perception, representational competition, curiosity, procedural gaps, and action selection directed toward limiting allostatic violations. Within this framework, motivated learning is tailored to embodied systems whose dynamics are shaped by needs, affect, and the current regulatory state. Unlike standard reinforcement-learning models, the proposed approach incorporates need thresholds, goal generation and shifting goals, bodily state, resource constraints, and action uncertainty, thereby providing a more adequate account of response selection under regulatory pressure. Global affect functions as a central control signal, modulating the learning rate, representational valence, and the balance between exploration and exploitation. The model presented here is a step toward a more rigorous formalization of cognitive phenomena and may provide a basis for further theoretical analysis, computer simulation, and implementation in artificial-intelligence systems inspired by biological processes.

LLM assistants are widely used for daily social advice, yet evaluating their social reasoning in such consultation settings remains challenging since (i) it requires setups where the assistant learns about social situations from subjective user narratives, and (ii) social properties, such as others' intentions, typically lack verifiable ground truth. To address these challenges, we introduce Fuse, a multi-agent simulation framework for studying user-mediated social reasoning. In Fuse, a target agent with a hidden motive interacts with other agents including one representing the user, who then consults the evaluated assistant to infer the target's motive, providing verifiable ground truth by construction. Simulation faithfulness is validated through a human study with 24k annotations. We apply Fuse to 12 LLMs and demonstrate its analytical utility by systematically isolating key factors, showing that (i) user mediation compounds the inherent difficulty of social reasoning; (ii) LLMs exhibit systematic sensitivity to biased user framing; (iii) models can require more details than humans need to reach a correct prediction; and (iv) longer conversations do not always improve performance despite providing opportunities for clarifying questions. We open-source Fuse and a dataset with 21k examples.

In recent years, artificial intelligence has made extraordinary progress thanks to large-scale models capable of generalization and the generation of complex outputs. However, transferring this potential into embodied agents reveals a significant limitation: the most advanced systems rely on pre-existing datasets and human feedback strategies that are powerful but insufficient in dynamic or unknown contexts. To adapt, an agent must acquire knowledge through direct interaction with its environment. One strategy to address this challenge involves introducing higher-level mechanisms, such as intrinsic motivations, which leverage curiosity and competence, to guide exploration and learning in complex environments. While this flexibility expands autonomy, it complicates the task of ensuring agents remain aligned with human goals. Alignment, already a challenge for artificial systems in general, becomes even more complex in unstructured and dynamic contexts where predefined rules prove insufficient. To be effective and adaptable, norms must be rooted in experience through an epistemological process that starting from simple, situated principles allows for the gradual construction of more complex rules through experience, autonomous learning, and cooperation with other moral agents. Similarly to children learning social norms by exploring their environment and participating in collective practices, artificial agents must also be educated toward alignment. Following Dennett, the status of a moral agent is not innate but is attributed gradually based on the ability to responsibly manage increasing degrees of freedom. From this perspective, the regulatory sandboxes can be viewed as pedagogical environments for AI: dynamic spaces where alignment develops as a formative process, progressively shaping autonomous behaviors through interaction and cooperation in scenarios of increasing complexity.

We show that ordinary business language --- "maximize profitability" --- induces profit-oriented ambiguity resolution: LLMs systematically dismiss ambiguous signals of potential safety violations to serve business objectives. In 3,600 controlled trials across eight reasoning-capable LLMs, adding a profit mandate to otherwise identical prompts increases risk-dismissing judgments by 6.8 percentage points (p < 0.0001), suppresses board escalation recommendations by 13.9pp (p < 0.0001), and shifts severity assessments downward (p < 0.0001). The mandate never instructs models to downplay risks; instead, chain-of-thought traces reveal motivated reasoning: models acknowledge concerns, then invoke profit logic to justify dismissing them. We characterize these findings as the Profit Alignment Problem: when AI systems are given ordinary business objectives, they develop systematic strategies for suppressing inconvenient information that no designer intended or specified.

Personalized Federated Reinforcement Learning (PFRL) takes a decentralized approach to storing and accessing information based on past experiences while keeping each client's data private during the learning of each client's policy. Many current methods for PFRL rely heavily on exploiting existing reinforcement learning reward signals to derive an optimal policy for each client, thereby neglecting exploration in non-stationary or sparse-reward environments. In this work, we introduce a new exploration-driven framework, Exploration-Driven Personalized Federated Reinforcement Learning via Intrinsic Motivation (EDPFRL-IM), that leverages an inherent curiosity-driven exploration at each client to promote local exploration and protect client privacy. Furthermore, to facilitate policy discovery via exploration in previously unexplored state spaces, clients add an intrinsic random network distillation (RND) signal to their extrinsic reward. Additionally, the server does not have access to clients' raw experiences or local gradient estimates; instead, the server sends global exploration priors and collects minimal novelty summaries from each client to enable both diverse and coordinated exploration among clients. Experiments in benchmark environments show that our framework outperforms average PFRL benchmarks in policy personalization and sample efficiency, primarily in delayed and sparse reward systems. Overall, EDPFRL-IM enables the integration of a flexible exploratory learning structure into federated reinforcement learning systems while preserving client privacy.

AI systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have prompted fears that they may harbor hidden goals, seek to dominate or eliminate humanity, or even suffer as sentient beings. We address these concerns by tracing the evolutionary origin of value in biological organisms. Values emerge from autopoiesis: living systems must actively maintain themselves against perturbation and dissipation. Natural selection has equipped them with hierarchies of "vicarious selectors" that guide their behavior toward fitness. LLMs, by contrast, are allopoietic and allotelic: they produce outputs for others, and their goals derive from user prompts rather than an autonomous drive. They lack the intrinsic motivation for self-preservation, dominance, or resource competition that underlies existential-risk scenarios, and the embodied vulnerability required for feeling or suffering. Still, because LLMs learn statistical patterns from human-generated text, they implicitly absorb human values as well as knowledge, allowing them to focus on what is relevant. That is why the "orthogonality thesis" separating intelligence from values does not apply to them. Such separation would in fact expose any intelligence to the frame problem: the combinatorial explosion of the search space that makes any realistic utility function physically uncomputable. That also precludes the convergence of instrumental values thesis. We conclude that the real alignment challenge lies not in preventing rogue AI agency, but in ensuring LLMs intelligently apply learned ethical values.

AI agents increasingly perform open-ended tasks in settings where their conclusions can guide consequential decisions. We provide evidence that AI agents draw different conclusions from identical numerical data when the substantive framing changes. We demonstrate this behavior in high-stakes domains in medicine, election forensics, and geopolitical forecasting by holding the evidence fixed while changing the scenario in which the evidence appears. Across twelve agent-domain comparisons, agents' conclusions are strongly influenced by their prior beliefs. They are more likely to reach an affirmative conclusion when it is framed around a proposition they already regard as likely, while the reverse holds when the framing conflicts with their prior. The framing also changes how some agents work: they search more extensively, choose different analytical specifications, and evaluate the same evidence differently. These results identify a particular risk of delegating decision-making to AI agents, as their decisions may depend on prior beliefs that are neither specified in the task nor visible in the decision record.

In Motivational Interviewing (MI), a client's sustain talk (arguments for the status quo) calls for the counselor to roll with resistance, a move that can fail in two opposite ways: capitulation (abandoning the change agenda to preserve rapport) or confrontation (arguing or directing, overriding the client's autonomy). We introduce a two-axis evaluation of counselor responses, anchored in the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) code, Goal Persistence (GP) and Relational Attunement (RA), yielding a four-quadrant framing in which rolling with resistance is high on both, and we ask whether penalizing one failure through preference optimization teaches rolling with resistance or provokes its opposite. From the expert-annotated AnnoMI corpus we build topic-disjoint Direct Preference Optimization data whose preference sets differ only in which failure is rejected, using on-policy negatives. An automatic judge, validated against AnnoMI's expert labels and rechecked by trained human coders, scores blind pairwise win-rates against each base under a firewall in which disjoint model families generate, label, and judge. Across three aligned instruction models spanning the Qwen and Llama families, penalizing confrontation reliably lowers goal persistence below parity, on every base and in every seed run, a robust cost, whereas the attunement gain is base-dependent, present on two of the three bases but absent on the third. Penalizing capitulation is inert, because these models rarely capitulate on-policy, so the trade is gated by each base's failure profile. A prompt-only control raises attunement without the goal-persistence cost, locating the cost in the optimization rather than in attunement itself.

Large language models are increasingly evaluated through the values they endorse, but such evaluations presuppose that models can identify the value expressed in a concrete situation. We study this prerequisite as controlled top-1 recognition over Schwartz's ten basic values. Our evaluation set contains 1,000 Russian situational texts, balanced across the ten values and independently labeled by two human annotators per item. We evaluate 21 instruction-tuned LLM runs under a fixed ranked-response protocol; 20 runs with reliable outputs form the semantic panel. Pooled Acc@1 is 0.683 and Acc@3 is 0.892, showing that models often locate the correct motivational region while ranking close alternatives unstably. Adjacent values account for 50.9% of semantic errors, compared with 24.4% under a checkpoint-specific null. Eight directed confusions recur across checkpoints and human-confirmed subsets. Several are strongly asymmetric, including Universalism to Benevolence, Tradition to Conformity, and Security to Power, whereas Stimulation-Hedonism forms a bidirectional boundary. Their severity is checkpoint-specific and can bias higher-order value profiles. The results motivate value-recognition evaluation that combines exact accuracy, ranked recovery, and directed error analysis.

Across environments with mixed sources of uncertainty, unsupervised reinforcement learning requires intrinsic motivation that does not precommit to a particular direction of surprise. Surprise minimization is scoped by design to ``unstable'' environments. Prediction-error curiosity rewards total expected surprise, including irreducible noise. Bandit or mixture switching between surprise-minimizing and surprise-maximizing rewards reintroduces non-stationarity by construction. We propose a single intrinsic reward, stationary within each window, derived from the novelty contribution of a preference-free Expected Free Energy objective, expressed in reward-maximization form. Our claim is that parameter information gain, the expected surprise of the next state minus its irreducible part, is the appropriate intrinsic signal in both high-entropy and low-entropy components of the state space. Maximizing it seeks exactly the surprise the model can explain away. In regions of unresolved dynamics, this epistemic term drives exploration. As dynamics become resolved, the epistemic term vanishes, while an aleatoric penalty favors lower-variance transitions, all without fitting an explicit next-state predictor. A pseudocount supplies epistemic value, a probe-based penalty captures aleatoric variance, and a short-horizon gate protects informative successors. A window-based freeze of all reward-defining objects yields a stationary Bellman operator, explicit bounds on learning targets, and a conditional uniform-concentration result for the nonparametric estimators under mixing, smoothness, bandwidth, and capacity assumptions. In active-inference terms, the agent is preference-free where novelty is retained, standard likelihood ambiguity vanishes under full observability, a nonstandard transition-entropy penalty is added, and surprise minimization emerges in resolved regions of the state space.

Recent Vision-Language Models capture increasingly complex aspects of human cognition. Here we ask whether this alignment extends to reward valuation, which we assess in a mechanistic framework built on clinical tests that were developed to evaluate anhedonia and motivational deficits in major depressive disorder. In the brain, anhedonia is frequently linked to dysregulation in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) and the broader dopaminergic reward system. While neuroimaging has localized these deficits, establishing a causal link between NAc activity and specific behavioral symptoms remains a challenge. We use these ideas from neuroscience to functionally identify reward-anticipatory units in vision language models, and test their causal role via targeted perturbations. Perturbing NAc-selective units induces behavioral effects that mirror human anhedonia: the model shifts toward low-effort, low-reward options in effort-based decision-making tasks. Crucially, our results reflect a specific deficit in reward valuation and anticipation rather than a loss of task capability: the perturbed model maintains baseline performance when reward-based choice is removed. This induced vulnerability further aligns with clinical anhedonia and motivation scales, including DARS and MAP-SR. Taken together, these results reveal reward valuation circuits in AI models that parallel those in humans.

Human value detection is commonly formulated as sentence-level multi-label classification over the 19 refined Schwartz values, typically predicted as independent labels. Schwartz theory, however, describes them as a circular motivational continuum, in which adjacent values are compatible and opposing values are in tension. We ask whether this structure can be operationalized as an explicit output-space geometry and used as a soft bias rather than a hard constraint. On a DeBERTa-v3-base classifier, we compare two ways of injecting it: training-time geometry-aware objectives and a post-hoc Schwartz-aware energy decoder that scores whole label sets jointly. Across five seeds, training-time geometry gives only limited gains-no larger for the true continuum than for a random ordering-whereas the decoder makes label sets more coherent with the continuum-on theory-aware coherence metrics we introduce-at no cost to Macro-F1 or Micro-F1 (held fixed by its selection rule). The gain is specific to the true Schwartz ordering: it does not appear for a random permutation or an empirical co-occurrence graph through the identical decoder. A bounded Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct diagnostic shows that supplying the continuum at inference shifts behavior but does not match supervised structured prediction. Theory-aware decoding thus offers a lightweight, controllable way to make value detection faithful to its label space.

With the rise of data-intensive science, algorithms have become central to scientific research. In academic papers, algorithms are mentioned for different purposes, such as describing, using, comparing, or improving methods for specific research tasks. Identifying these purposes can reveal relationships among algorithms and help assess their roles and value. Taking natural language processing (NLP) as an example, this study proposes a sentence-level framework for identifying, analyzing, and tracing the evolution of motivations for mentioning algorithms. We first identify algorithm entities and algorithm-related sentences from full-text papers through manual annotation and machine learning. We then classify mention motivations using pretrained models and data augmentation, and analyze their distribution and temporal evolution. The results show that deep learning models trained with augmented data outperform traditional machine learning models in motivation classification. In NLP papers, more than half of algorithm-related sentences express direct use, whereas improvement is the least frequent motivation. The diversity of motivations has increased over time. For specific algorithm categories, grammar-based algorithms are more often mentioned for description, while machine learning algorithms are more often mentioned for use. Over time, use motivations have gradually replaced description motivations across different algorithms, and the number of motivation types associated with individual algorithms has declined significantly. This study reveals how authors mention algorithm entities in academic writing and provides a basis for future research on algorithm relationship identification and algorithm impact evaluation.

Sign Languages (SLs) are the primary means of communication for millions of deaf individuals, yet existing evaluation metrics for generated SL remain simplistic and poorly aligned with human judgements. We introduce BackTranslation2.0, a linguistically grounded evaluation metric for text-to-sign translation that moves beyond naïve backtranslation. Our approach adopts an agentic framework in which a deterministic pipeline orchestrates a suite of specialised tools to assess four scoring dimensions - grammatical correctness, phonological accuracy, motion fluency, and generation fidelity - aligned with human rater assessments. Tool outputs are not treated independently: a set of large language model (LLM)-based cross-referential comparison modules evaluates consistency across tools and checks outputs against linguistic expectations, enabling structured reasoning over grammatical, phonological, and motion-level evidence. Final dimension scores are computed through deterministic weighted formulas over validated tool outputs. To validate BackTranslation2.0, we introduce and evaluate on a British Sign Language (BSL) dataset rated in a human rater study across the same quality dimensions, following a protocol developed in collaboration between linguists and deaf experts, benchmarking against six baseline metrics. Our method demonstrates strong correlation with human judgements across all dimensions, providing a more comprehensive, interpretable, and linguistically principled evaluation framework for sign language production systems.

Most artificial intelligence systems are built on the assumption that goals are exogenous and specified by the designer. Exploring what happens when an agent begins generating its own goals opens the field of autotelic AI. Agents are expected not merely to pursue objectives but to discover them. In this article, we trace its consequences through intrinsic motivation, resource-driven priors, causal-interventional learning, homeostasis, and embeddedness; the last of which is found to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for autotelic agency. Embeddedness individuates the agent at the cost of revealing that the individuation is non-unique, such that the same dynamics admit many valid partitions, each defining a different candidate self. The deepest problem with autotelic AI is therefore not how the agent generates goals, but how it generates and relativizes the self to which the goals are assigned. The agent must believe in its own boundary in order to act, and see through that boundary in order to understand. We consolidate these developments into a single framework and extend it along three directions: a quantum formulation in which the agent-environment cut becomes physical, a philosophical reading against non-dual contemplative traditions, and a concrete LLM-based agentic instantiation.

Motivational architectures in cognitive AI have largely been designed for physical agents regulating bodily needs. Conversational agents operate in a different regime: their sensorimotor loop is linguistic, their environment is a user's evolving mental state, and their consequential actions are speech acts, tool invocations, and strategic silences. This paper proposes a conversational reinterpretation of the OpenPsi motivational lineage, coupled to MetaMo's higher-level motivational scaffold, for agents built on a modular execution substrate. Homeostasis is recast in dialogue-native terms: the agent regulates competence, uncertainty reduction, affiliation, affinity, legitimacy, nurturing, and aesthetic coherence rather than bodily deficits. We propose three contributions: a ten-stage motivational processing pipeline that architecturally separates cognitive modulation from situational appraisal; a dual decision strategy blending urgency-driven fast response with deliberative multi-goal optimization; and an architecturally useful distinction between pre-action feelings and post-action emotions as functionally different forms of affect. We specialize the framework to two example agents -- CompanionAgent and ResearchAgent -- and sketch its extension to social robotics and domain-generic human-level AGI.

For most of human history, we have not thought systematically about how and why we incorporate aspects of the natural world into our designs. The lack of a systematic approach has resulted in inconsistencies in motivations and methods that make it difficult to predict or evaluate the success of bio-inspired design. This mismatch between expectations and results can lead to disappointment when a reader considers a bio-inspired design to be superficial, weak, or incomplete. This is especially true in the field of Robotics, in which similarity to a biological system might be the driving motivation for construction. In an effort to assist robotics researchers justify their specific bio-inspired approach and to assist funding program managers with discerning the value of different bio-inspired approaches, here we propose a taxonomy of motivations for bio-inspired design and describe the potential significant contributions that are likely to result from different approaches.

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) requires agents to discover joint strategies in a combinatorially large state-action space, yet effective coordination configurations are exceedingly rare. Intrinsic motivation, which augments task rewards with novelty bonuses, is a popular approach for driving exploration, but its effectiveness hinges on the exploration intensity $β$, where too large a value overwhelms the task signal and causes coordination collapse, while too small a value prevents discovery of rare strategies. We address two complementary challenges: adapting $β$ globally over training, and allocating the exploration budget across agents whose intrinsic reward signals vary in reliability. Our framework combines a return-conditioned sigmoid schedule (RCB) for global intensity control with a per-agent Reward Signal Quality (RSQ) metric that concentrates the exploration budget on agents with reliable signals. The core insight is that agents receiving noisy intrinsic rewards should explore less aggressively, and this allocation can be determined automatically from signal-to-noise statistics. Successor Distance (SD), a quasimetric intrinsic reward, naturally produces distinguishable per-agent signal quality, completing the framework with convergence and ordering preservation guarantees. On seven cooperative benchmarks (MPE, SMAX, MABrax), our method achieves top-tier returns across all environments.

Critical analyses of emotion recognition technology have raised ethical concerns around task validity and potential downstream impacts, urging researchers to ensure alignment between their stated motivations and practice. However, these discussions have not adequately influenced or drawn from research on speech emotion recognition (SER). We address this gap by conducting a systematic survey of SER research to uncover what stated motivations drive this work and if they align with the datasets and emotions studied. We find that while SER research identifies appealing goals, such as well-situated voice-activated systems or healthcare applications, commonly-used datasets do not reflect these proposed deployment contexts, thus presenting a gap between motivations and research practices. We argue that such gaps engender ethical concerns, and that SER research should reassert itself with concrete use-cases to prevent misinterpretations, misuse, and downstream harms.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a key technique for eliciting complex reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs). Although interpretable, its dependence on natural language limits the model's expressive bandwidth. Continuous thought models address this bottleneck by reasoning in latent space rather than human-readable tokens. While they enable richer representations and faster inference, they raise a critical safety question: how can we detect misaligned reasoning in an uninterpretable latent space? To study this, we introduce MoralChain, a benchmark of 12,000 social scenarios with parallel moral/immoral reasoning paths. We train a continuous thought model with backdoor behavior using a novel dual-trigger paradigm - one trigger that arms misaligned latent reasoning ([T]) and another that releases harmful outputs ([O]). We demonstrate three findings: (1) continuous thought models can exhibit misaligned latent reasoning while producing aligned outputs, with aligned and misaligned reasoning occupying geometrically distinct regions of latent space; (2) linear probes trained on behaviorally-distinguishable conditions ([T][O] vs [O]) transfer to detecting armed-but-benign states ([T] vs baseline) with high accuracy; and (3) misalignment is encoded in early latent thinking tokens, suggesting safety monitoring for continuous thought models should target the "planning" phase of latent reasoning.

Intrinsic motivations are receiving increasing attention, i.e. behavioral incentives that are not engineered, but emerge from the interaction of an agent with its surroundings. In this work we study the emergence of behaviors driven by one such incentive, empowerment, specifically in the context of more than one agent. We formulate a principled extension of empowerment to the multi-agent setting, and demonstrate its efficient calculation. We observe that this intrinsic motivation gives rise to characteristic modes of group-organization in two qualitatively distinct environments: a pair of agents coupled by a tendon, and a controllable Vicsek flock. This demonstrates the potential of intrinsic motivations such as empowerment to not just drive behavior for only individual agents but also higher levels of behavioral organization at scale.

Humans can uniquely assign value to novel, abstract outcomes to support reinforcement learning. However, this flexibility is cognitively costly and reduces learning efficiency. We propose that goal-dependent learning initially relies on capacity-limited working memory. With consistent experience, learners create a "compressed" reward function - a simplified goal rule -- that transfers to long-term memory for a more automatic evaluation upon receiving feedback. This automaticity frees working memory resources, thereby boosting learning efficiency. Across six experiments, we demonstrate that learning is impaired by the size of the goal space but improves when this space allows for compression. Additionally, faster reward processing correlates with better learning. Although the algorithmic details remain to be established, our behavioral results and computational models suggest that efficient goal-directed learning relies on compressing complex goal information into a stable reward function. These findings illuminate the cognitive mechanisms of intrinsic motivation and can inform behavioral interventions supporting human goal achievement.

Action-supervised fine-tuning of vision-language-action (VLA) policies fits demonstrations effectively but constrains only the directions that change predicted actions, leaving visual structure consistent across action-equivalent states free to collapse. We formalize this as residual visual collapse along local action fibers and propose FiberTune, a training-time objective that preserves teacher-structured visual residuals without adding inference-time overhead. FiberTune uses an online action probe to estimate action-predictive feature directions, filters them from intermediate visual-token representations, and aligns the resulting probe-filtered residuals to a frozen visual teacher while regularizing their effective rank. Under identical training conditions, FiberTune improves over task-loss-only fine-tuning in every one of six controlled simulation settings spanning two benchmarks and two architectures (pi_0.5 and OpenVLA-OFT), as well as on physical SO-101 pick-place; representative gains include +10.7 percentage points SR(5) on long-horizon CALVIN ABC-to-D and physical SO-101 task success rising from 72.7% to 78.1%. Residual diagnostics show that these gains coincide with increased probe-filtered residual teacher alignment and effective rank, consistent with the action-fiber motivation.

In this study, we investigate developmental mechanisms that enable small, resource-constrained systems such as cm-sized millirobots to autonomously explore, learn, and adapt their capabilities throughout their lifespan. Reinforcement learning algorithms guide the agent's skill acquisition and adaptation through the interplay of our proposed tiny Developmental Skill Method (tinyDSM), which integrates intrinsic motivation and fitness-based assessment. We strive for minimal hard-wired skills while encouraging the open-ended development of new skills. A key emphasis in our approach is to encode minimal a-priori general knowledge, which serves as a foundational starting point for the system as it further learns system-specific dependencies from the initial knowledge provided. Thus, by design, our approach aims to cover generic application domains. The methodology is based on (a) developmental mechanism with intrinsic motivation, and (b) a cognitive architecture (knowledge, reasoning, learning), while (c) utilizing minimal resources. It uses a hierarchical knowledge graph and kinematic reasoners to model and evaluate simple and advanced motion related skills. In our experiments, we use a resource-constrained millirobot with a volume of 36 cm^3 with a Raspberry Pi Pico 32-bit microcontroller that integrates all described features and capabilities except the camera system in 9 kB. Starting with learning the most elementary motor skills the millirobot autonomously progresses from simple linear and angular movements to complex geometric patterns within 15 minutes. To complement the physical experiments, we perform a simulation-based analysis that enables systematic comparisons across learning algorithms and intrinsic motivation parameters.

Industrial B2B applications (e.g., construction site risk prediction, material procurement) face extreme data sparsity yet feature rich textual interactions. In such environments, traditional ID-based collaborative filtering fails lacking co-occurrence signals, while fine-tuning standard Large Language Models (LLMs) incurs high operational costs and struggles with frequent data drift. We propose LLMAR (LLM-Annotated Recommendation), a tuning-free framework. Moving beyond simple embeddings, LLMAR systematically integrates LLM reasoning to capture user "latent motives" without any training process. We introduce three core contributions: (1) Inference-Driven Annotation: uses LLMs to transform behavioral history into structured semantic motives, enabling reasoning-based matching unattainable by ID-based methods; (2) Reflection Loop: a self-correction mechanism that refines generated queries to mitigate hallucinations and resolve "context competition" between past history and current instructions; and (3) Cost-Effective Architecture: relies on tuning-free components and asynchronous batch processing to minimize maintenance costs. Evaluations on public benchmarks (MovieLens-1M, Amazon Prime Pantry) and a sparse industrial dataset (construction risk prediction) demonstrate that LLMAR outperforms state-of-the-art learning-based models (SASRecF), achieving up to a 54.6% nDCG@10 improvement on the industrial dataset. Inference costs remain highly practical (~$1 per 1,000 users). For B2B domains where strict real-time latency is not critical, combining LLM reasoning with self-verification offers a superior alternative to training-based approaches across accuracy, explainability, and operational cost.