Medical Report Generation

Automated medical report generation, MRG, holds substantial value for alleviating radiologist workload and enhancing diagnostic efficiency. However, mainstream approaches typically treat diverse chest abnormalities as isolated classification targets. This paradigm often overlooks inherent disease co-occurrences and struggles to translate medical topological structures into explicit data correlations, constraining the model's reasoning capacity on complex or subtle lesions. To address this, we propose a Graph-Augmented Dual-Stream Medical Report Generation with Topological Internalization, GDMRG. Our framework introduces a Topological Knowledge Internalization module, TKI, which leverages a Graph Convolutional Network, GCN, to generate an explicit parameterized weight matrix based on global disease co-occurrence priors. This facilitates efficient topological knowledge injection without relying on external retrieval mechanisms. Building upon this, we construct a dual-stream classification system: the main branch generates discrete diagnostic prompts under topological constraints, while the auxiliary branch employs an asymmetric optimization strategy to dynamically calibrate decision boundaries for highly imbalanced samples. Concurrently, to establish a logical closed loop between diagnosis and visual grounding, we design a diagnostic-driven Diagnosis-Guided Spatial Attention, DGSA, that utilizes high-dimensional clinical semantics to recalibrate the visual encoder, mitigating feature hallucinations. Comprehensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR dataset demonstrate that GDMRG achieves competitive clinical efficacy, CE, while maintaining natural language fluency. Furthermore, our model exhibits robust zero-shot generalization on the IU X-Ray dataset. In summary, this work presents an integrated and interpretable paradigm for medical report generation.

Whole-slide images (WSIs) present a fundamental challenge for computational pathology due to their extreme resolution, multi-scale heterogeneity, and the requirement for clinically reliable interpretation. Although recent pathology foundation models have enabled fluent report generation, they often lack clinical grounding, failing to accurately represent key diagnostic concepts and relationships observed by pathologists. This limitation arises from the difficulty of integrating heterogeneous visual evidence spanning fine-grained cellular patterns, slide-level tissue architecture, and high-level diagnostic concepts, while maintaining interpretability and clinical coherence. Here we present SCOUT: Semantic Context-aware mOdality fUsion Transformer, a context-aware concept-grounded multimodal framework for pathology report generation that enables progressive conditioning of image representations by global slide information and explicit diagnostic concepts. The method integrates local histological patterns, whole-slide context, and expert-curated semantic descriptors within a unified learning paradigm, allowing visual features to be dynamically refined throughout the encoding process. By combining depth-aware contextual modulation with adaptive multimodal fusion during text generation, the framework produces clinically coherent reports while preserving complementarity across representational scales. Using CONCH1.5 features, we evaluate SCOUT against WSI-Caption, HistGen, and BiGen on TCGA-BRCA, MICCAI REG, and HistAI. SCOUT achieves the best BLEU-1 to BLEU-4 and METEOR scores on all datasets, plus the best ROUGE-L on TCGA-BRCA and MICCAI REG. On TCGA-BRCA, it reaches 0.436/0.303/0.202/0.156 BLEU-1/2/3/4 and 0.204 METEOR; on REG 2025, it achieves 0.865/0.834/0.805/0.780 and 0.568. These results support progressive contextual conditioning for grounded pathology report generation.

The evaluation of generated reports remains a critical challenge in Computed Tomography (CT) report generation, due to the large volume of text, the diversity and complexity of findings, and the presence of fine-grained, disease-oriented attributes. Conventional evaluation metrics offer only coarse measures of lexical overlap or entity matching and fail to reflect the granular diagnostic accuracy required for clinical use. To address this gap, we propose CT-FineBench, a benchmark built from CT-RATE and Merlin to evaluate the fine-grained factual consistency of CT reports, constructed from CT-RATE and Merlin. Our benchmark is constructed through a meticulous, Question-Answering (QA) based process: first, we identify and structure key, finding-specific clinical attributes (like location, size, margin). Second, we systematically transform these attributes into a QA dataset, where questions probe for specific clinical details grounded in gold-standard reports. The evaluation protocol for CT-FineBench involves using this QA dataset to query a machine-generated report and scoring the correctness of the answers. This allows for a comprehensive, interpretable, and clinically-relevant assessment, moving beyond superficial lexical overlap to pinpoint specific clinical errors. Experiments show that CT-FineBench correlates better with expert clinical assessment and is substantially more sensitive to fine-grained factual errors than prior metrics.

Training vision-language models (VLMs) for medical report generation is often hindered by the scarcity of high-quality annotated data. This work evaluates the use of a weighted loss function to improve data efficiency. Compared to standard cross-entropy loss, which treats all token prediction errors equally, the reweighted loss shifts the focus to semantically salient tokens with outsized clinical importance. In experiments on ophthalmological report generation, we show that this simple method improves efficiency across multiple data scales, achieving similar report quality with up to ten times less training data.

Automated medical report generation for 3D PET/CT imaging is fundamentally challenged by the high-dimensional nature of volumetric data and a critical scarcity of annotated datasets, particularly for low-resource languages. Current black-box methods map whole volumes to reports, ignoring the clinical workflow of analyzing localized Regions of Interest (RoIs) to derive diagnostic conclusions. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing VietPET-RoI, the first large-scale 3D PET/CT dataset with fine-grained RoI annotation for a low-resource language, comprising 600 PET/CT samples and 1,960 manually annotated RoIs, paired with corresponding clinical reports. Furthermore, to demonstrate the utility of this dataset, we propose HiRRA, a novel framework that mimics the professional radiologist diagnostic workflow by employing graph-based relational modules to capture dependencies between RoI attributes. This approach shifts from global pattern matching toward localized clinical findings. Additionally, we introduce new clinical evaluation metrics, namely RoI Coverage and RoI Quality Index, that measure both RoI localization accuracy and attribute description fidelity using LLM-based extraction. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that our framework achieves SOTA performance, surpassing existing models by 19.7% in BLEU and 4.7% in ROUGE-L, while achieving a remarkable 45.8% improvement in clinical metrics, indicating enhanced clinical reliability and reduced hallucination. Our code and dataset are available on GitHub.

Automating medical reports for retinal images requires a sophisticated blend of visual pattern recognition and deep clinical knowledge. Current Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often struggle in specialized medical fields where data is scarce, leading to models that overfit and miss subtle but critical pathologies. To address this, we introduce DREAM (Dynamic Retinal Enhancement with Adaptive Multi-modal Fusion), a novel framework for high-fidelity medical report generation that excels even with limited data. DREAM employs a unique two-stage fusion mechanism that intelligently integrates visual data with clinical keywords curated by ophthalmologists. First, the Abstractor module maps image and keyword features into a shared space, enhancing visual data with pathology-relevant insights. Next, the Adaptor performs adaptive multi-modal fusion, dynamically weighting the importance of each modality using learnable parameters to create a unified representation. To ensure the model's outputs are semantically grounded in clinical reality, a Contrastive Alignment module aligns these fused representations with ground-truth medical reports during training. By combining medical expertise with an efficient fusion strategy, DREAM sets a new state-of-the-art on the DeepEyeNet benchmark, achieving a BLEU-4 score of 0.241, and further demonstrates strong generalization to the ROCO dataset.

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for clinical documentation tasks such as SOAP note generation remains challenging. Unlike standard summarization, these tasks require clinical abstraction, normalization of colloquial language, and medically grounded inference. However, prevailing evaluation methods including automated metrics and LLM as judge frameworks rely on lexical faithfulness, often labeling any information not explicitly present in the transcript as hallucination. We show that such approaches systematically misclassify clinically valid outputs as errors, inflating hallucination rates and distorting model assessment. Our analysis reveals that many flagged hallucinations correspond to legitimate clinical transformations, including synonym mapping, abstraction of examination findings, diagnostic inference, and guideline consistent care planning. By aligning evaluation criteria with clinical reasoning through calibrated prompting and retrieval grounded in medical ontologies we observe a significant shift in outcomes. Under a lexical evaluation regime, the mean hallucination rate is 35%, heavily penalizing valid reasoning. With inference aware evaluation, this drops to 9%, with remaining cases reflecting genuine safety concerns. These findings suggest that current evaluation practices over penalize valid clinical reasoning and may measure artifacts of evaluation design rather than true errors, underscoring the need for clinically informed evaluation in high context domains like medicine.

Pathology reports are structured, multi-granular documents encoding diagnostic conclusions, histological grades, and ancillary test results across one or more anatomical sites; yet existing pathology vision-language models (VLMs) reduce this output to a flat label or free-form text. We present HiPath, a lightweight VLM framework built on frozen UNI2 and Qwen3 backbones that treats structured report prediction as its primary training objective. Three trainable modules totalling 15M parameters address complementary aspects of the problem: a Hierarchical Patch Aggregator (HiPA) for multi-image visual encoding, Hierarchical Contrastive Learning (HiCL) for cross-modal alignment via optimal transport, and Slot-based Masked Diagnosis Prediction (Slot-MDP) for structured diagnosis generation. Trained on 749K real-world Chinese pathology cases from three hospitals, HiPath achieves 68.9% strict and 74.7% clinically acceptable accuracy with a 97.3% safety rate, outperforming all baselines under the same frozen backbone. Cross-hospital evaluation confirms generalisation with only a 3.4pp drop in strict accuracy while maintaining 97.1% safety.

Longitudinal information in radiology reports refers to the sequential tracking of findings across multiple examinations over time, which is crucial for monitoring disease progression and guiding clinical decisions. Many recent automated radiology report generation methods are designed to capture longitudinal information; however, validating their performance is challenging. There is no proper tool to consistently label temporal changes in both ground-truth and model-generated texts for meaningful comparisons. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising annotation alternative, as they are capable of capturing nuanced linguistic patterns and semantic similarities without extensive manual intervention. They also adapt well to new contexts. In this study, we therefore propose an LLM-based pipeline to automatically annotate longitudinal information in radiology reports. The pipeline first identifies sentences containing relevant information and then extracts the progression of diseases. We evaluate and compare five mainstream LLMs on these two tasks using 500 manually annotated reports. Considering both efficiency and performance, Qwen2.5-32B was subsequently selected and used to annotate another 95,169 reports from the public MIMIC-CXR dataset. Our Qwen2.5-32B-annotated dataset provided us with a standardized benchmark for evaluating report generation models. Using this new benchmark, we assessed seven state-of-the-art report generation models. Our LLM-based annotation method outperforms existing annotation solutions, achieving 11.3% and 5.3% higher F1-scores for longitudinal information detection and disease tracking, respectively. The source code is available at https://github.com/wxinyi1996/Standardizing-Longitudinal-Chest-X-ray-Report-Evaluation-via-Large-Language-Model-Annotation.git.

In high-stakes domains such as healthcare, privacy concerns severely limit the use of real-world training data. Differentially private (DP) synthetic data offers a promising alternative with formal privacy guarantees, but achieving strong utility remains challenging for clinical note generation due to domain specificity and long-form text complexity. We present Term2Note, a method for synthesising full-length clinical notes under DP constraints. By structurally separating content and form, Term2Note generates section-wise note content conditioned on medical terms, with terms and notes privatised under separate DP constraints, and applies a DP quality maximiser to improve outputs. Experiments demonstrate that Term2Note produces synthetic notes with statistical properties closely aligned with real clinical notes, and that downstream models trained on these notes achieve performance comparable to those trained on real clinical data. Compared to existing DP text generation baselines, Term2Note substantially improves both fidelity and utility, without relying on label distribution assumptions, highlighting its effectiveness as a practical privacy-preserving alternative to real clinical notes.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding common visual elements, largely due to their large-scale datasets and advanced training strategies. However, their effectiveness in medical applications remains limited due to the inherent discrepancies between data and tasks in medical scenarios and those in the general domain. Concretely, existing medical MLLMs face the following critical limitations: (1) limited coverage of medical knowledge beyond imaging, (2) heightened susceptibility to hallucinations due to suboptimal data curation processes, (3) lack of reasoning capabilities tailored for complex medical scenarios. To address these challenges, we first propose a comprehensive data curation procedure that (1) efficiently acquires rich medical knowledge data not only from medical imaging but also from extensive medical texts and general-domain data; and (2) synthesizes accurate medical captions, visual question answering (VQA), and reasoning samples. As a result, we build a multimodal dataset enriched with extensive medical knowledge. Building on the curated data, we introduce our medical-specialized MLLM: Lingshu. Lingshu undergoes multi-stage training to embed medical expertise and enhance its task-solving capabilities progressively. Besides, we preliminarily explore the potential of applying reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards paradigm to enhance Lingshu's medical reasoning ability. Additionally, we develop MedEvalKit, a unified evaluation framework that consolidates leading multimodal and textual medical benchmarks for standardized, fair, and efficient model assessment. We evaluate the performance of Lingshu on three fundamental medical tasks, multimodal QA, text-based QA, and medical report generation. The results show that Lingshu consistently outperforms the existing open-source multimodal models on most tasks ...

Clinical diagnosis is a gradual process of evidence integration, in which physicians move from symptoms and medical history to examinations, competing hypotheses, disease relations, and treatment decisions. Large language models have advanced medical text understanding and generation. Yet their clinical use remains limited by weak evidence grounding, opaque reasoning, and inconsistent links among differential diagnosis, final diagnosis, diagnostic basis, and treatment planning. We introduce MedCollab, a multi-agent framework for full-cycle clinical diagnosis and report generation. MedCollab coordinates specialist and examination agents according to patient records. It structures agent deliberation with an Issue-Based Information System (IBIS) protocol, so that each diagnostic position is supported by patient-specific evidence and medical knowledge. It also builds Hierarchical Disease Relation Chains (HDRC) to connect accepted hypotheses through progression, complication, and comorbidity relations. During multi-round deliberation, a verifier-guided consensus module evaluates evidence support, medical plausibility, and logical conflicts. It then adjusts agent contributions and filters unsupported reasoning. Experiments on ClinicalBench and MIMIC-IV show that MedCollab outperforms leading LLMs and medical multi-agent baselines in diagnostic accuracy, evidence consistency, and clinical reasoning quality. These results indicate that structured and auditable collaboration can produce more faithful and clinically coherent diagnostic reports.