Medical Visual Question Answering

We describe our submission to the MedReason 2026 challenge, covering multiple-choice (MCQ) and open-ended (OE) medical visual question answering (VQA) under fully offline, containerized inference. Our first finding is that MCQ retrieval must compare answer \emph{semantics} rather than answer labels: labels are independently assigned per question, so copying a retrieved neighbor's label transfers no useful information, whereas scoring each current option's text against correct-answer text from similar training cases raises retrieval-only accuracy from 20.0% to 57.5% on a 200-case retrieval-excluded development holdout. Our second finding attributes the submitted system's accuracy: holding the task-specific MCQ Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapter fixed and varying the number $k$ of in-prompt retrieved examples changes accuracy by at most one case --- 187/200 (93.5%) at both $k=0$ and the adapter's training-time $k=1$, 188/200 (94.0%) at the packaged runtime's default $k=3$ --- and the submitted confidence-gated override adds no net accuracy on top of $k=3$, selecting the VLM in 198/200 cases. With the final MCQ adapter fixed, retrieval changes accuracy by at most one case, and gating provides no net gain. On 20 OE cases, token-F1 and RaTEScore~\cite{zhao2024ratescore} decrease as $k$ grows, but paired sign tests on token-F1 differences are nonsignificant ($p \ge 0.29$); a single-annotator comparison found 6/20 wrong-anchor errors for the final configuration and 14/20 for an earlier configuration that jointly differed in routing, adapter, and prompting. The system reaches 94.0% MCQ accuracy on the development holdout and 93.20% on the organizer's official pre-evaluation, versus 29.43% for the off-the-shelf reference baseline, while both of the organizer's open-ended scores are lower than that baseline's (ground-truth agreement 1.245 versus 1.588, visual accuracy 1.995 versus 2.696, each out of 4).

Medical volume visualization requires selecting regions of interest (ROIs) and carefully controlling their relative visual emphasis according to a given clinical intent. Implementing these decisions in conventional workflows demands substantial clinical and visualization expertise and often involves trial-and-error optimization. Recent agentic systems have introduced natural-language interaction and autonomous visualization operations but largely rely on MLLM-based inference throughout the workflow. Although MLLMs encode broad medical knowledge and provide strong reasoning capabilities, such inference may be suboptimal for medical volume visualization, potentially leading to clinically incomplete interpretations of user requests and unreliable ROI identification and visualization optimization. In this work, we present MedVA, an end-to-end neuro-symbolic agentic system for medical volume visualization that addresses these limitations through three complementary agents. The neuro-symbolic intent formulation agent refines MLLM-based interpretations of natural-language requests through symbolic reasoning over established clinical knowledge, which provides more complete, clinically grounded ROI specifications than MLLM-only reasoning. The multi-model ROI identification agent directly identifies semantically specified ROIs in the original volume by leveraging complementary large-scale pretrained medical segmentation models. The objective-driven visualization optimization agent explicitly evaluates ROI visibility and occlusion in the original volume using a volume-based visibility objective. Extensive agent-level and system-level evaluations across diverse medical datasets and interaction scenarios support the effectiveness of the individual agents. A formative user study further indicates high usability and practical value among users with different levels of expertise.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains, showing considerable potential in medicine. However, their application in medical settings remains limited by the scarcity of visual question answering (VQA) datasets that capture clinical reasoning and explicit image-text alignment. Here, we leverage de-identified medical images and expert commentaries shared on clinician-oriented social media. By combining an advanced LLM with clinician-in-the-loop verification, we established a rigorous pipeline to construct ThoughtMed-1M, a long-form medical VQA dataset containing over one million VQA pairs and designed to capture structured clinical logic and medical image-text alignment. To demonstrate its utility, we developed a FOundational LLM Trained on ThoughtMed-1M (FOLTMed). FOLTMed achieved state-of-the-art performance across 42 medical VQA benchmark datasets, with a macro accuracy of 85.4%, and generated more clinically coherent responses on the ThoughtMed-1M test set. It outperformed state-of-the-art models by 3--5% across factuality and similarity metrics, highlighting a scalable paradigm for advancing research on clinically grounded multimodal LLMs.

A benchmark score credits final answers, but not the route by which an item can be answered. In medical multimodal multiple-choice questions (MCQs), this distinction matters because a correct answer can be supported by the intended image finding or by benchmark-preserved cues in the wording of answers, non-visual clinical text, visible image text, artificial annotations, or device/context artifacts. We call the resulting score-level overinterpretation reasoning inflation. Here, a route is an observable input path that can support answer selection, not a claim about the model's hidden cognition. Across six medical multimodal MCQ datasets, we separate candidate cues from behavioral evidence through prompt- and image-side audits, modality ablations, and matched repairs that preserve the medical target and answer key. In a 13-configuration open-model panel, full-input accuracy is 62.63%, while text-only and options-only settings achieve 53.96% and 29.71%, respectively. Removing length-gap, absolute/conspicuous, and spatial/prepositional cues lowers accuracy by 6.58, 3.50, and 4.77 percentage points. We also construct MedQA-MM, a 1,000-item shortcut-mitigated subset, where text-only and options-only accuracy fall to 5.21% and 12.33%. This does not imply that models never use images; it shows that medical image-reasoning claims require route-level evidence.

Mixed-format medical visual question answering (VQA) requires stable option selection and machine-readable free-text output. The two formats fail differently: multiple-choice predictions can change with option symbols or positions, while clinically plausible open answers can fail automated evaluation when serialization is malformed. We address both challenges with an answer-text memory, a permutation-stabilized vision--language expert, and a sparse candidate- expanding router. The cyclic schedule follows prior work; our contribution is to make expert top-2 a routable candidate alongside memory and expert top-1. On a 1,403-case retrospective internal analysis, this expansion improves a matched binary router from 88.95% to 91.73% (+2.78 percentage points; 95% CI 1.57--3.99), with 56 rescued errors and 17 regressions. Oracle coverage rises from 90.31% to 96.15%, and the final submitted configuration reaches 92.23% on the same retrospective split. For open questions, strict generation and deterministic guards produce 475/475 schema- valid participant-facing outputs without repair, retry, or hard-gate failure. Visual ablations reveal substantial textual dependence. Candidate expansion supplies the principal controlled routing gain; open-path evidence establishes output-contract validity rather than clinical correctness in medical use or deployment.

Benchmark saturation and data contamination increasingly obscure genuine scientific reasoning in frontier LLMs. We introduce \textsc{ScienceArena}, an olympiad-style benchmark from thirteen public science competitions in physics, chemistry, and biology, including IPhO and IChO 2025--2026, IBO 2023, USAPhO 2026, and USNCO 2025. Its open-ended, multi-step problems use process-credit rubrics, making faithful scoring difficult. We build ScienceArena through an expert-audited digitization pipeline that converts official exams, figures, solutions, and rubrics into structured items verified by olympiad medalists. To scale evaluation beyond costly human grading, we calibrate LLM-as-judge against medalist ground truth on archived answers from five models across IPhO and IChO; two strong judges stay within one point of expert total scores. Medalist notes show that failures often stem from visual grounding, structure fidelity, and global problem control rather than missing terminology. Evaluating fourteen recent LLMs with interleaved solving, we find that top models obtain medal-equivalent rubric scores on several public international exams, while chemistry and long-horizon consistency remain key bottlenecks. We provide an interactive \href{https://science-arena.onrender.com/}{demo}.

We introduce a Polish-language medical visual question answering (VQA) benchmark, built from Polish Board Certification Examination questions for licensed physicians and dentists pursuing specialist certification. The benchmark comprises image-containing questions spanning diverse medical specialties and visual domains, together with a text-only question answering (QA) control set. We evaluate Polish-oriented, general-purpose open-weight, and commercial vision-language models. The task remains challenging: the best model achieves 79.0% accuracy on the full VQA set, and only GPT-5.6 surpasses the approximate human reference on the subset with available candidate responses; all other evaluated models perform worse than humans. To assess visual grounding, we compare complete inputs with configurations omitting the image, the question, or both, and categorize questions by image importance. Models derive more useful information from the question text than from the image and perform worse on image-dominant questions. Across both QA and VQA, they nevertheless achieve above-chance accuracy from the answer choices alone, showing that non-trivial performance can persist even when key task components are missing.

Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) has enabled medical Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to produce Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning for visual question answering, yet these models suffer from $\textit{confidence miscalibration}$---a systematic gap between expressed certainty and actual diagnostic accuracy that undermines clinical trust. We propose $\textbf{CARE}$, a $\textbf{C}$onfidence-$\textbf{A}$ware medical $\textbf{RE}$asoning framework that jointly optimizes accuracy and calibration through a dual-stage pipeline. First, a scalable Medical-CoT synthesis provides structured cold-start data for Supervised Fine-Tuning. Second, Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a novel $\textbf{Confidence-Aware Reward (CAR)}$ mechanism ties the model's confidence to diagnostic correctness within the reward signal. Across three Medical VQA benchmarks, $\textbf{CARE}$ achieves the highest diagnostic accuracy while obtaining the lowest Expected Calibration Error and Hallucination Rate, establishing a foundation for trustworthy clinical decision support. Our code is available at https://github.com/anotherbricki/CARE.

Medical visual agents can use tools to inspect images and retrieve external knowledge, but indiscriminate tool use may introduce noisy or misleading evidence. Reliable diagnosis therefore requires not only acquiring additional observations, but also verifying whether tool actions are necessary and whether the resulting evidence supports the current hypothesis. We introduce MIRA (Medical Image Reflection for Agentic Diagnosis), a medical visual diagnostic framework for autonomous evidence search and reflective verification. MIRA dynamically invokes image-processing operations, including zooming, grounding, pointing, rotation, and measurement, as well as web search, while evaluating the relevance and consistency of the acquired evidence. We develop MIRA through a two-stage training strategy. First, a tool-augmented Monte Carlo Tree Search data engine explores diverse diagnostic hypotheses and jointly verifies visual grounding accuracy and semantic consistency to construct supervised fine-tuning trajectories. Second, reinforcement learning further improves decision-making through online reflective principle evolution: failure cases are distilled into candidate principles, and only principles that improve held-out rollout rewards are retained. Across nine medical visual reasoning benchmarks, MIRA achieves an average score of 64.73, improving its Qwen3-VL-8B backbone by 7.44 points. It also increases useful tool-use judgments from 56.2% to 73.8% and reduces harmful judgments from 8.9% to 1.6%. Qualitative analyses show that MIRA can re-examine evidence, correct premature conclusions, and adapt its tool-use strategy. Project page: https://MIRA-VL.github.io/

Natural-language-driven "vibe coding" enables the one-shot generation of visually rich and interactive web applications, yet reliable assessment of their quality has not kept pace. Existing evaluations often score isolated artifacts or final task outcomes, offering limited evidence about which failures occur and why. We introduce VideoVIBE, a video-grounded benchmark that transforms human-operated webpage recordings into fine-grained diagnostic tasks. It contains approximately 1.7K diagnostic Video QA instances derived from 6,338 verified failures across generated webpages, spanning semantic-logical, visual-motion, structural-temporal, and functional failures. Diagnoses are grounded primarily in recorded presentation and behavior, with webpage source code used as complementary context. We further propose V2Lens, a training-free, evidence-grounded multi-agent system that challenges and selectively refines initial video-based diagnoses through targeted visual and source-code verification. Across thirteen closed-source and open-weight Video MLLMs, Gemini-2.5-Flash is the strongest standalone model with a score of 64.54, while V2Lens reaches 71.72, an improvement of 7.18 points. Together, our results show that video-grounded evaluation can move beyond isolated artifacts and aggregate outcomes toward a behaviorally faithful and diagnostically informative account of generated application quality.

Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) requires aligning subtle visual evidence, including lesion texture, boundary sharpness, and diffuse density changes, with clinical language. Existing multimodal fusion approaches operating in the spatial domain may not fully exploit complementary frequency information present in visual and textual representations. We introduce a dual-branch frequency-domain fusion module that conditions spectral filtering on the input question, enabling adaptive selection of global low-frequency structure and fine-grained high-frequency detail before reconstructing the spatial representation for answer generation. To provide a richer spectrum for filtering, we extract complementary features from early texture-sensitive and final semantic layers of a frozen BiomedCLIP encoder and align both with the question representation using a symmetric InfoNCE objective prior to staged joint training with a BioBART decoder. We pretrain the proposed model on PMC-VQA and fine-tune it on the VQA-RAD and SLAKE benchmarks, demonstrating that frequency-aware multimodal fusion improves medical VQA performance while maintaining a lightweight and efficient architecture.

Slice-based MLLMs leverage mature 2D encoders by representing 3D volumes as sequences of 2D slices. However, this slice-wise formulation produces thousands of visual tokens that burden the LLM backbone, many of which capture overlapping visual evidence across adjacent slices. To understand how effectively a growing visual token budget improves performance, we perform scaling analyses on two 3D medical VQA benchmarks and find diminishing returns: cost keeps rising while accuracy saturates, and improving in-plane resolution is more effective than adding slices at comparable budgets. The budget should therefore be allocated more selectively rather than simply enlarged, yet most token compression methods are designed for 2D images or videos, where redundancy arises from spatial layout or temporal motion rather than from near-duplicate content along the depth axis. We present CARVE, a training-free framework that compresses visual tokens prior to LLM inference and casts token reduction as budget-constrained 2.5D allocation. CARVE partitions the depth axis into coherent windows and allocates tokens non-uniformly according to normalized cross-slice evidence. Under a shared budget, CARVE builds spatial anchors on representative slices and retrieves locally varying evidence from the full volume, then merges remaining eligible tokens into nearby anchors within each window. Removing roughly 80% of the visual tokens on Hulu-Med-7B, CARVE leads all compression baselines on every AMOS-MM report-generation metric, with 6.2 points higher retention of full-token quality than the strongest baseline, and preserves 98.1% of full-token performance across three VQA benchmarks.

In clinical practice, patients often undergo multiple imaging examinations over successive visits, yielding longitudinal data. Modeling such temporal information is crucial for reliable assessment of disease progression and treatment response. However, despite the rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), longitudinal medical visual reasoning remains largely underexplored. To fill this gap, we propose LoMeVQA, a comprehensive benchmark consisting of 206K longitudinal visual question answering (VQA) pairs for temporal medical image analysis. LoMeVQA covers five tasks: progress classification, progress description, progress report generation, differential region grounding, and differential region description. To construct the dataset, we develop an automated pipeline that (1) organizes patient records chronologically, (2) extracts clinically meaningful entities via a medical knowledge graph, and (3) models their temporal evolution to guide large language models in generating high-quality longitudinal VQA pairs. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that both general-purpose and medical-domain MLLMs perform poorly on LoMeVQA, revealing substantial limitations in temporal reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce MedLong-8B, which achieves state-of-the-art performance across all tasks. Beyond benchmarking, we conduct detailed analyses that uncover key failure modes and shed light on how to improve longitudinal medical visual reasoning. Our data is available at: https://github.com/pepperbubble/LoMeVQA

Multi-frame medical VQA appears to reward increasingly complex adaptation: controller-style inference, localization-aware reranking, static hard-negative mixing, and staged continuation all appear plausible from first principles. We test a simpler competing hypothesis on MedFrameQA: methods that remain tightly aligned with the benchmark's final answer objective should be the strongest \emph{robust} adaptation family once evaluation is controlled across fixed splits, matched budgets, repeated seeds, and calibration. We compare controller-based methods, scaffold evolution, static mixed supervision, continuation-heavy variants, and direct answer-only supervised fine-tuning (SFT). The strongest robust family is direct decoder-only answer SFT on MedGemma-1.5-4B. Empirically, this family yields substantial improvements in held-out report accuracy over frozen baselines while remaining remarkably stable across repeated seeds and matched controls, ensuring our claims reflect true family-level robustness rather than an isolated hyperparameter peak. Furthermore, post-hoc calibration effectively repairs confidence estimation without compromising accuracy, and the core approach transfers consistently to secondary backbones like Qwen2.5-VL-3B. The main result is therefore not that a complex auxiliary mechanism wins, but that objective-aligned direct answer SFT is the strongest robust adaptation family we found for MedFrameQA. By establishing this strong, minimalist baseline, we hope to redirect community focus toward fundamentally robust optimization rather than architectural complexity.

Multi-image medical VQA is not merely a prompt-length problem; it is a fundamental challenge of agentic decision-making. Medical vision-language agents must aggregate evidence across ordered images, remain robust to answer-order perturbations, and avoid overfitting to noisy search-time feedback. We study MedFrameQA through a controlled comparison of five inference-time agentic strategies, optimized using the same high-budget ShinkaEvolve configuration and evaluated on a reproducible internal frozen split (1,331 evolution, 665 holdout, 855 final test). Across five independent repeated runs, the strongest method emerges as the simplest robust aggregator: the \textbf{order-vote} policy achieves $57.89 \pm 0.65\%$ final-test accuracy, significantly outperforming the fixed baseline ($52.73 \pm 0.42\%$) and the more complex, albeit brittle, order-rerank variant ($55.79 \pm 0.43\%$). Paired bootstrap analysis confirms these significant gains. Extending the evolutionary search budget from 50 to 100 generations yields no generalization benefit: while holdout performance marginally increases, final-test accuracy drops from $57.89\%$ to $56.02\%$. Our findings suggest that for multi-image medical reasoning, defining the correct agentic decision rule is substantially more impactful than expanding the optimization search budget.

Pathological diagnosis is inherently multi-scale, requiring the integration of global tissue architecture at low magnification with cellular morphology at higher magnification. However, existing pathology benchmarks and vision-language models (VLMs) are still largely developed under single-scale settings, limiting their ability to learn clinically meaningful multi-magnification reasoning. Moreover, naively constructed visual question answering (VQA) tasks may be susceptible to text-only or superficial visual shortcuts, leading to unreliable assessments of visual understanding. To address these limitations, we introduce a benchmark and training framework for shortcut-resistant cross-scale pathology reasoning. We design an Adversarial Text-only Screening strategy for semantic reasoning questions and a Structure-controlled Distractor Sampling strategy for visual grounding questions, encouraging models to rely on cross-scale visual evidence. Based on this pipeline, we construct PathScale-VQA, a high-quality cross-scale pathology VQA benchmark with 10,373 multiple-choice questions grounded in 1,368 diagnostic paths across multiple magnification levels. Building on the semantic reasoning set, PathScale-R1 is optimized through Difficulty-driven Reasoning Distillation supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning with a Scale-aware Reasoning Structure reward, which encourages the use of evidence across magnifications. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance of PathScale-R1 on cross-scale reasoning tasks and effective transfer to conventional single-scale pathology VQA. Our code is available at https://github.com/iMVR-PL/PathScale-R1.

Interactive egocentric medical image segmentation (IEMIS) plays an important role in smart-glasses-assisted medical image review, segmenting the medical targets a clinician refers to from their egocentric view. Once it succeeds, the object-level visual evidence it provides strengthens the review and underpins fine-grained analysis and clinical decision-making. However, the instruction and the video both come from the user's egocentric perspective, which poses two challenges. (1) Semantic ambiguity leaves the model unable to confirm the user-intended target. (2) Visual variability makes the segmentation jump from frame to frame. In this paper, we propose EgoMed-Agent, a multi-agent system that understands the target from the human perspective through two workflows. (1) The \textit{Target Confirmation Workflow} grounds the instruction against candidate targets with a reliability score, confirming the target when the grounding is reliable and asking the user to clarify when it is not, thereby confirming the segmentation target. (2) The \textit{Localization-Guided Propagation Workflow} couples mask propagation with per-frame target localization, using the localized target to correct the propagated mask whenever the two diverge, so the segmentation stays on the target across the egocentric video. Extensive experiments show that EgoMed-Agent reaches 71.34% average Dice, far above the best text-prompted baseline (11.70%). Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/wdyyyyyy/EgoMed-Agent}{our project page}.

Building foundation models for medical imaging requires pooling data across institutions, yet privacy regulations prohibit centralized aggregation. Existing Federated Foundation Models either fine-tune natural-image models with poor medical-domain transfer, or train from scratch within a single modality, lacking the flexibility to unify tasks. We identify an under-explored challenge, Imaging Modality Heterogeneity, where clients operate under two structural regimes: Overlapped (shared modalities with heterogeneous label distributions) and Non-overlapped (fully disjoint modalities per client). We propose FM$^2$, a unified framework that trains the core backbone from scratch to preserve medical domain fidelity while optionally incorporating biomedical pretrained encoders for vision-language alignment. FM$^2$ equips each client with dual Mixture-of-Experts modules (a Class-wise MoE for personalized category knowledge and a Domain-wise MoE for shared cross-modality representations), coupled with a Heterogeneous Modality Alignment (HMA) regularizer that explicitly aligns modality-specific expert parameters, admitting provable $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ convergence and generalization guarantees. FM$^2$ further incorporates Caption-Enhanced Learning (CEL), where locally retained GPT-4o-generated captions serve as a textual semantic bridge enabling representation transfer across clients with disjoint modalities, and demonstrates extensibility to Federated Medical VQA. Experiments on our MIMH benchmark (classification and CEL) and real-world medical VQA datasets confirm consistent superiority over state-of-the-art federated baselines and strong out-of-modality generalization across all three tasks.

Deploying medical visual question answering (MedVQA) systems in real-world clinical settings requires models that adapt to new clinical tasks without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. Continual learning (CL) provides a practical framework for this setting. Despite rapid progress in medical vision-language models, the behavior of CL methods when training these models across heterogeneous MedVQA tasks remains underexplored. This work presents a systematic evaluation of CL for MedVQA across diverse clinical objectives, including classification, multi-label classification, detection, cell counting, and report generation. Specifically, we explore (1) the ability of existing CL methods to mitigate catastrophic forgetting; (2) their sensitivity to task ordering, analyzing how different task sequences influence performance retention and forgetting; and (3) the evolution of low-rank adaptation parameters as new tasks are learned, revealing patterns of weight drift under different CL methods. Our findings suggest that existing CL methods struggle to maintain stability-plasticity balance when tasks with different objectives and supervision formats are interleaved. Code and full experimental setup will be publicly available.

Following the CMIVQA, MMI-VQA, and M4IVQA challenges in NLPCC 2023--2025, we introduce the Difficulty-Aware Medical Instructional Video Question Answering (DA-MIVQA) shared task for NLPCC 2026. DA-MIVQA extends previous multilingual and multimodal medical video benchmarks by explicitly distinguishing questions according to the type and complexity of evidence required for answering. Specifically, simple questions can often be answered from subtitle-based textual cues, whereas complex questions require visual grounding, procedural understanding, and cross-modal evidence integration. The challenge contains three tracks: Difficulty-Aware Temporal Answer Grounding in Single Video (DA-TAGSV), Difficulty-Aware Video Corpus Retrieval (DA-VCR), and Difficulty-Aware Temporal Answer Grounding in Video Corpus (DA-TAGVC). The dataset is collected from public medical instructional channels, covers diverse scenarios such as first aid, emergency response, rehabilitation, nursing, and general medical education, and is manually verified with difficulty annotations. This paper presents the task motivation, dataset construction, evaluation protocol, participation overview, competition results, and representative systems of DA-MIVQA. DA-MIVQA provides a practical benchmark for evaluating medical instructional video question answering systems under varying textual, visual, temporal, and procedural reasoning requirements.

Large vision language models (VLMs) report strong accuracy on medical question-answering, yet it remains unclear whether they reason from visual evidence or exploit textual shortcuts. We introduce a counterfactual evaluation framework that decouples visual and textual contributions by substituting input images with controlled surrogates blank, pixel-shuffled, image-absent, and CLIP-retrieved hard negatives and derive a suite of grounding metrics including the Visual Reliance Score (VRS) and Visual Hallucination Rate (VHR). We further introduce CORAL (COntrastive Retrieval-Augmented Learning), a 7B-parameter LoRA fine-tune of Qwen2.5-VL-7B trained with a Contrastive Grounding Objective (CGO) that penalises answer invariance under hard-negative image swaps. On a paired controlled evaluation across four closed-form medical VQA benchmarks (PathVQA, PMC-VQA, SLAKE, VQA-RAD; n=400 total), CORAL improves macro accuracy by +6.7 pp (P(Delta>0)=0.988) and reduces VHR by 8.0 pp (P<0.001) over the matched Qwen2.5-VL-7B base; neither MedVLThinker RL variant achieves a significant gain on either metric. Cross-domain diagnostics further reveal that image substitution costs only <=6.5 pp on medical benchmarks versus 48-61 pp on general-domain tasks, situating the grounding gap that CGO targets. We discuss evaluation limitations openly including train/eval benchmark overlap and underpowered secondary metrics and release our framework, training code, and model weights to support reproducible grounding audits of medical VLMs.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly applied in medical tasks such as pathology description, report generation, and visual question answering. Medical Image Quality Assessment (MIQA) supports diagnostic accuracy and patient safety by determining whether images meet the standards required for clinical decision-making. Automating MIQA with VLMs may reduce workload, but their behavior under real-world conditions, where images may be degraded or textual context may affect judgments, should be further explored before deployment. We benchmark VLMs on medical image quality using the MediMeta-C dataset zero-shot across seven corruption types and five severity levels. We evaluate sensitivity to degradation patterns, the effect of corruptions on embedding geometry, and whether textual attributes (demographics, expertise, infrastructure, institution) alter scores. Across 16 VLMs and seven modalities, pixelation produced the largest score reductions (mean -20.58%, up to -34.4% for OCT), whereas brightness had limited effect (-0.81%). Embedding displacement was associated with score changes. Same-family models showed correlations of 0.67-0.83; some produced increases up to +31% for corrupted mammography. Textual attributes affected scores: institutional prestige raised them +17.15%, and equipment age lowered them -14.7%. The largest changes were +95.62% (InternVL-8B) and -37.7% (MedGemma). Current VLMs show limitations for medical image quality assessment. Pixelation, a privacy-preserving transformation, reduces performance, indicating a trade-off between patient privacy and reliability. Sensitivity to contextual metadata indicates limited objectivity and marks metadata as a privacy and bias source. Privacy protection and objective quality assessment are related requirements for use.

Existing medical video benchmarks primarily evaluate whether a model produces the correct answer, but rarely assess whether it answers at the right time. In real clinical settings, AI systems must decide not only what to predict, but also when to answer, defer judgment, or proactively raise alerts. This creates a critical gap between benchmark evaluation and deployment requirements. We present MedStreamBench, a benchmark for time-aware medical video understanding. MedStreamBench integrates 22 medical datasets and 5,419 QA instances across four temporal settings: retrospective, present, future, and proactive. Unlike conventional benchmarks that assume full-video access, MedStreamBench restricts models to temporally bounded evidence windows and supports both single-turn and streaming evaluation. We further introduce a proactive monitoring setting that requires models to determine whether and when clinically relevant alerts should be triggered. Beyond answer correctness, MedStreamBench evaluates temporal behavior through responsiveness and post-evidence stability. Experiments on leading general-purpose and medical vision-language models reveal a substantial gap between offline recognition and temporally grounded decision-making, with performance dropping markedly in streaming and proactive settings. Our benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Venn2024/MedStreamBench.

Medical multiple-choice question answering requires parameter-efficient adaptation across heterogeneous knowledge domains and reasoning operations. A medication question, a diagnostic decision, a public-health item, and a nursing-action item may require different low-rank updates, while some recall items should preserve the base model's representation with only mild adapter intervention. We propose BiRG-LoRA, a single-adapter rank-gated LoRA method for medical question answering. BiRG-LoRA keeps one LoRA module per target layer but makes its rank dimension input-conditioned: for each question, a biaxial gate combines hidden semantic evidence with specialty/profession priors, clinical-operation priors, and their interaction to select a sparse top-$k$ subset of rank atoms. A scalar injection coefficient further controls the strength of the selected adapter update. Under a matched Qwen3-8B CMB-source protocol, BiRG-LoRA achieves the highest four-benchmark macro-average accuracy among trainable PEFT baselines and matched routing controls: 69.31% averaged over CMB, CMExam, MedQA, and MedMCQA. It improves over MoELoRA by 0.89 percentage points while using 28.1% fewer trainable parameters; a paired, benchmark-stratified bootstrap over final predictions gives a 95% confidence interval of [0.42, 1.37] for this macro-average gain. Basic controls show that BiRG-LoRA also improves over vanilla LoRA r16 and active-rank-matched LoRA r4 by 0.83 macro points, and an evaluation-time weak-axis perturbation check suggests that performance is not brittle to moderate tag noise. The results support a bounded claim: clinically structured rank allocation improves cross-benchmark medical QA under a matched single-seed protocol, while training-seed variance remains future work.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) applied to Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) tend to produce overconfident outputs regardless of actual correctness, and existing verbalized confidence calibration methods, developed primarily for text only LLMs, do not account for the multimodal nature of medical image understanding. This work proposes a training based framework that finetunes MLLMs to improve their calibration using a composite loss function combining a Brier style calibration term, an anchor regularizer that prevents confidence collapse toward extreme values, a contrastive image text alignment term, and a KL based model stabilization term. The alignment signal is derived from a $2 \times 2$ factorial perturbation design that crosses image presence with text integrity, probing the reliance of the model on visual modality input versus language priors. Finally, a top K KL divergence regularizer is used to protect the answering ability of the model during finetuning. Across three Medical VQA benchmarks and two architectures (MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen2 VL 7B Instruct), our method reduces calibration error by 60% or more, and improves discrimination by 26% or more, while preserving predictive accuracy. On average across benchmarks, the technique outperforms prompting based, sampling based, and training based approaches, and ablation experiments confirm that each component of the loss function is indeed necessary for improving the calibration. All code for the experiments is publicly available.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show great potential in medical tasks, but their elicited confidence often misaligns with actual accuracy, potentially leading to misdiagnosis or overlooking correct advice. This study presents the first comprehensive analysis of the relationship between accuracy and confidence in medical MLLMs. It proposes a novel method that combines Multi-Strategy Fusion-Based Interrogation (MS-FBI) with auxiliary expert LLM assessment, aiming to improve confidence calibration in Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA). Experiments demonstrate that our method reduces the Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by an average of 40% across three Medical VQA datasets, significantly enhancing MLLMs' reliability. The findings highlight the importance of domain-specific calibration for MLLMs in healthcare, offering a more trustworthy solution for AI-assisted diagnosis.

Vision-Language models (VLMs) reliability in medical diagnosis is challenged by trust-undermining hallucinations. Existing hallucination detection approaches mainly focus on identifying factual inconsistencies between generated text and reference data. While some studies analyze where models attend in images, they seldom verify whether such attention truly reflects the visual evidence supporting the generated text. To address this gap, we propose Co}unter-Evidence Verification (CoEV), a training-free plug-and-play framework that detects and corrects hallucinations through evidence-based factual consistency verification. CoEV performs bidirectional verification between textual assertions and visual evidence, testing whether each statement is supported by its corresponding evidence region, and assigns each statement into a four-quadrant diagnostic map capturing combinations of text factuality and visual grounding. CoEV detects hallucinated content and serves as a post hoc refinement tool, correcting hallucinations without retraining. Extensive experiments on four medical datasets show that CoEV combats hallucinations in VLMs.For hallucination detection, CoEV consistently outperforms existing methods, improving average PR-AUC and ROC-AUC by 3.0% and 3.9% absolute points respectively, with notable gains of up to 18.5% in specific VQA scenarios. For hallucination correction, it improves Micro-F1 by up to 12.5%, reduces hallucination rates by over 11.9% on medical report generation, and also boosts medical VQA accuracy. These results show that CoEV enables reliable detection and correction of hallucinations, providing clinicians with dependable, evidence-based cues for diagnosis. Code will be released upon acceptance.

Safe deployment of clinical vision-language models (VLMs) requires reliable uncertainty estimation (UE): a signal indicating when predictions should be trusted or escalated to a clinician. We test whether current UE methods actually deliver this signal. Benchmarking 8 methods across 12 VLMs on clinical visual question-answering (VQA), we find that UE quality is not an intrinsic property of the UE method: it tracks model accuracy, degrading precisely where the model performance is weakest, and therefore where reliability is most needed. When we stress-test models by hiding the correct option among the multiple-choice answers (NOTA perturbations), accuracy collapses while uncertainty barely changes, leaving models systematically miscalibrated. Yet, we find that uncertainty on the unperturbed input reliably anticipates which predictions will collapse under NOTA, indicating that UE in current VLMs carries diagnostic information about model fragility. Our results position UE as a diagnostic tool for identifying fragile predictions and motivate perturbation-based evaluation as a path toward safe clinical deployment.

A vision-language model can answer a question about a medical image fluently and confidently while barely using the image, leaning instead on language priors. In medicine this is the failure that matters most, because the answer looks trustworthy and is not, and the only protection is a confidence score reliable enough to tell the system when to abstain. We ask a deployment question rather than an accuracy one: how much imaging work a model can safely handle alone, and which confidence signal makes that possible. We evaluate seven confidence estimators across five open-weight LVLMs and three medical visual-question-answering datasets spanning broad clinical imaging, radiology, and pathology, with every probe trained only on natural images and applied without adaptation. Recast as bounded selective prediction (automate a case only when confidence clears a threshold, defer the rest), the comparison is cautionary. The standard metrics are poor guides: discrimination barely separates the methods, and the weak calibration of a cheap self-report is cheaply removed by off-domain temperature scaling without changing deployable yield. What distinguishes a usable estimator is the high-confidence region a clinician acts on: the weakest baselines are confidently wrong on 41 to 45 percent of their errors against 1 to 4 percent for the best probe, and no estimator is reliably best across domains or models. Safe handoff is governed at two levels: base-model competence sets a ceiling, so a well-calibrated score recovers roughly a third of radiology cases at a 20 percent error tolerance but almost none of pathology; the confidence layer then decides how much of that ceiling is reachable. The usable role today is calibrated triage, not autonomy: automate the cases a calibrated score marks safe, route the rest to a clinician. We release all outputs, correctness judgments, and confidence scores, with code.

We study whether grounded reasoning supervision from abundant 2D medical images can improve 3D medical VQA when both input types are aligned through a common reasoning interface. We introduce UniReason-Med, a single-checkpoint framework that processes either a 2D image or a slice-serialized 3D volume at inference time, generating interleaved textual reasoning and localized visual evidence through shared box syntax, region-token injection, and a common grounded reasoning policy. To train this interface, we construct UniMed-CoT, a 220K instruction-tuning dataset with interleaved textual reasoning and grounded visual evidence, including 170K 2D and 50K 3D samples. Through supervised fine-tuning followed by outcome-level reinforcement learning, UniReason-Med learns to generate grounded reasoning traces without IoU/Dice-based localization rewards during RL. Data-mixture and component ablations show that joint 2D+3D grounded supervision substantially improves 3D reasoning over 3D-only training, while grounding and region-token injection consistently benefit both 2D and 3D tasks. These results suggest that a shared grounded reasoning interface can transfer reasoning structure from 2D images to slice-serialized volumetric medical understanding. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/IQuestLab/unireason-med.

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are evaluated on public benchmarks whose images and question-answer pairs have been freely downloadable for years, yet reported accuracy assumes these examples were absent from pretraining. We audit open VLMs on SLAKE-En, PathVQA, VQA-RAD, and an auxiliary public OmniMedVQA mirror using four detector families: image-side near-neighbour overlap against PMC-OA-beta, canonical-order exchangeability, cohort-relative Min-K%++ tail enrichment, and cross-model top-K overlap. We find measurable image-side source overlap on SLAKE-En: 19.8% of images are flagged under SigLIP-B-16 and 4.2% under SigLIP-SO400M, while out-of-domain controls produce 0/2000 flags. Manual adjudication shows same-modality, same-projection matches to different patients rather than verified pixel-level duplicates, so we interpret this as source or distributional overlap rather than confirmed per-image memorization. On the text side, Qwen2.5-VL on SLAKE-En shows a canonical-order exchangeability signal that survives ordering ablation and external non-medical baselines. On the OmniMedVQA mirror, exchangeability fires for five medical and general VLMs while BLIP-2 remains clean. In contrast, cohort-relative Min-K%++ tail enrichment and cross-model top-K overlap collapse under an external pre-domain baseline: BLIP-2 reproduces the apparent positive signals despite lacking plausible medical-VQA exposure. We conclude that these cohort-relative detectors are unreliable as standalone membership-inference signals on small medical-VLM cohorts.

Vision and language models (VLMs) hold immense promise to transform biomedical imaging workflows, from detecting lesions in chest X-rays to profiling cellular features in microscopy. Realizing this potential, however, requires robust and fine-grained visual perception. Models need to correctly interpret subtle features in images, and they must do so across diverse biomedical modalities, scales, and contexts. Nevertheless, current benchmarks remain limited. To address these gaps, we introduce the Massive Multimodal Biomedical Understanding (MMBU) benchmark. It is the largest biomedical vision and language benchmark to date, covering 35 submodalities with rich structured metadata. It includes both open and closed versions of ungrounded classification, grounded classification, and object detection, enabling systematic evaluation of model performance across biological scales, clinical settings, and imaging modalities. Evaluating 15 open-weight and 2 frontier VLMs, we find that while medical adaptation provides measurable gains for some models, the high accuracy often reported on established benchmarks can mask deficiencies in visual perception and domain generalization.

Medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) has strong potential for clinical decision support by enabling AI models to interpret medical images and answer clinically relevant queries. Recent approaches typically connect off-the-shelf vision encoders with large language models (LLMs) through lightweight mapping networks to reduce computational cost. However, these methods often overlook the importance of handling noise and small irrelevant changes in visual representations. To address these challenges, we propose a noise-aware Med-VQA framework that incorporates a denoising autoencoder before visual embeddings are mapped into the input space of an LLM. The denoising autoencoder is pretrained to reconstruct clean visual embeddings from corrupted inputs, encouraging the model to learn robust visual representations that are less sensitive to noise. The resulting embeddings are then projected into the language model embedding space using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), forming visual prefix tokens that provide image information to the LLM. To enable efficient adaptation without full retraining, we employ parameter-efficient fine-tuning using low-rank adaptation (LoRA). The proposed method is evaluated on the SLAKE and PathVQA benchmarks. Experimental results show improved robustness to noisy input embeddings while maintaining competitive clean performance across multiple evaluation criteria. These findings suggest that learning more robust visual representations can enhance Med-VQA performance and robustness.

Longitudinal medical visual question answering (VQA) requires reasoning about anatomical differences between an image of a current time point and an image of a referred time point. We propose an attention-guided encoder-decoder for this task with chest X-rays. Instead of conventional direct contrast, we propose to include a lightweight affine registration module to reduce nuisance motion by co-registering the current image to the reference image with a small registration regularizer. The registered image pair is fed into the image encoder, followed by a frozen DINO-based mask generator and a trainable adaptive mask generator to produce masks applied to the original image pairs. The masked image pairs are again fed into the image encoder and concatenated with text features as the input to a multimodal transformer-based decoder to generate final answers. To facilitate learning stabilization and clarify the change signal, inspired by DINO-v3, we include additional auxiliary objectives, including a mask rebuilding loss, a pairwise Gram-style consistency loss, and a KoLeo uniformity loss, which enhances the geometry of the representation. On the Medical-Diff-VQA benchmark, the model delivers strong BLEU, ROUGE-L, CIDEr, and METEOR scores while offering intrinsic interpretability through the shared saliency mask. These results support saliency-conditioned generation with mild pre-alignment as a principled framework for longitudinal reasoning in medical VQA. Our training strategy also illustrates the potential of a paradigm in utilizing image foundation models in biomedicine: optimizing both supervised and unsupervised learning objectives simultaneously.

Medical Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are typically evaluated on English radiology visual question answering benchmarks, leaving their robustness under non-English clinical language largely unexplored. We introduce IndoRad-VQA, an Indonesian adaptation of VQA-RAD, to assess whether medical VLMs retain radiology reasoning ability when questions are asked in Bahasa Indonesia. Radiology question-answer pairs are translated into Indonesian with self-evaluation-based quality control to preserve clinical meaning, terminology consistency, and answer equivalence. We evaluate general-purpose, Southeast Asian multilingual, and medical-specific VLMs under English and Indonesian prompting settings. Beyond accuracy, we quantify the language robustness gap between English and Indonesian inputs. We also conduct an error analysis to identify failure modes of question answering, such as yes/no flips, laterality errors, and output-language mismatches. Our findings show that strong performance on English medical VQA benchmarks does not necessarily translate to robust behavior in Indonesian clinical contexts. We observe a performance gap of 8 to 25 percent between the English and Indonesian settings, depending on the evaluation metric. These results highlight the need for more inclusive multilingual evaluation of medical multimodal foundation models. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Lab-IS/IndoRad-VQA.

Medical visual question answering requires models to ground their responses in image evidence, because visually unsupported answers can mislead downstream interpretation. However, many medical VQA questions are generic, template-like, or highly similar in form, which can encourage models to learn question-answer shortcuts instead of image-dependent reasoning and thereby increase the risk of hallucinated responses. We propose Ask4VG, a label-free pilot framework for risk-aware question selection. Ask4VG estimates question-induced hallucination risk through counterfactual visual probing: the same question is asked under the original image, a perturbed image, a blank image, and a mismatched image, and the resulting answer relations are converted into weak supervision for a counterfactual risk estimator. The learned estimator then reranks candidate question rewrites to favor intent-preserving questions that are less invariant to missing or mismatched visual evidence before final answer generation. On VQA-RAD with Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct, prompt-only rewriting increases counterfactual risk, whereas predicted-risk reranking reduces held-out risk from 0.658 to 0.623 and improves exact accuracy from 0.337 to 0.356. A 300-sample PMC-VQA external check shows the same direction of risk reduction with a small accuracy gain. These results suggest that question selection is a promising complement to response-level hallucination mitigation for reliable medical VQA.

Biomedical question answering with large language models is commonly evaluated using answer accuracy, but answer accuracy alone does not indicate whether a model can produce parseable outputs, follow structured reliability instructions, recognize weak answer spaces, or avoid confident incorrect commitments. This paper presents HypothesisMed, an inference-time reliability pipeline for biomedical multiple-choice question answering. It combines direct, chain-of-thought, HypothesisMed-v3 prompting, and answer fusion. The final answer is selected by fusion, while HypothesisMed-v3 supplies SPACE labels and confidence information. SPACE labels mark the answer space as VALID, INCOMPLETE, or CONTRADICTED. We evaluate Qwen2.5-7B, Phi-4-mini, DeepSeek-R1-32B, and BioMistral-7B on MedQA, MedMCQA, and PubMedQA using 1,000 examples per dataset. The pipeline improves weighted accuracy over each model's best direct or chain-of-thought baseline while increasing parse and SPACE coverage. We also scale evaluation to Qwen2.5-7B and Phi-4-mini using 10,183 examples per model. Fusion improves Phi-4-mini accuracy from 0.4296 to 0.5192, while Qwen2.5-7B chain-of-thought remains slightly higher in answer accuracy. However, Qwen2.5-7B fusion achieves complete parse and SPACE coverage with much lower false commitment. A 12,000-example SPACE stress test shows answer-space diagnosis remains difficult, with SPACE accuracy of 0.3074 for Qwen2.5-7B and 0.4168 for Phi-4-mini. These results show that answer accuracy, parseability, structured reliability reporting, calibration behavior, and false-commitment behavior are separable capabilities. The main contribution is not a universal state-of-the-art claim, but a reproducible inference-time framework for evaluating biomedical question answering models as auditable workflow components under structured reliability constraints.

Medical video diagnosis involves inferring clinical decisions from dynamic tissue responses throughout examination processes. Existing methods rely on an end-to-end learning paradigm that i) focuses on appearance rather than pathology, ii) lacks clinical priors, and iii) reasons solely from observations without counterfactual comparison. This work introduces MedVCR, a counterfactual reasoning framework that mimics clinical diagnostic thinking. MedVCR comprises three components: a Counterfactual Generator that synthesizes tissue evolution under specified pathological states via a diffusion-based manner; a Counterfactual Representation Learning module that encodes diagnostic knowledge through clinical rules (i.e., temporal consistency, pathological separability, and counterfactual alignment); and a Dual Diagnostic Prediction strategy that integrates video-level assessment with frame-level counterfactual analysis. MedVCR is evaluated under both fully supervised (e.g., colposcopy) and weakly supervised (e.g., colonoscopy) video diagnosis settings, yielding 2.6%-10.2% performance gains compared with leading baselines. Comprehensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of each component. The code will be released.

The major limitations of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy AI systems arise from a shortage of annotated data, strict privacy policies, and significant bottlenecks in conventional model fine-tuning. Such limitations impede the successful application of sophisticated AI models in clinical practice, particularly affecting the reliability and scalability of diagnosis. In this paper, we present a dual-pipeline PEFT model that addresses two fundamental problems: medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) and the generation of privacy-preserving synthetic data. For clinical VQA, we adopt the Florence-2 vision-language model. Leveraging PEFT enhances model interpretability while substantially reducing the computational cost of training. Simultaneously, we employ Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) with Stable Diffusion 2.1 to generate high-quality GI images that enhance training databases without violating patient privacy. This research utilized the Kvasir-VQA dataset. Our Florence-2 VQA model achieved ROUGE-1 of 0.92, ROUGE-L of 0.91, and BLEU score improvements from 0.08 to 0.24. Fine-tuning on private datasets consistently showed better results than fine-tuning on public datasets. The rank-4 LoRA synthesis achieved optimal performance with a fidelity score of 0.290, an agreement score of 0.730, and a Frechet BiomedCLIP Distance (FBD) of 1450, reducing computational costs by almost 90 percent. This framework improves the clinical potential of AI in GI endoscopy. Compared to FLUX, MSDM, and Kandinsky 2.2, our model demonstrates superior FBD and strong semantic alignment. While other models lead in Fidelity or Agreement, our lower FBD indicates better image-text coherence. These results establish our approach as a robust solution for enhancing VQA and synthetic data generation in clinical AI.

Vision-language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in general medical visual question answering, yet due to limited interpretability, it remains unclear whether their predictions reflect evidence-grounded clinical reasoning or reliance on spurious priors. We introduce Med-R2 Bench, a hierarchical benchmark aligned with the clinical workflow to evaluate adversarial robustness with visual grounding. We design stepwise QA tasks to assess whether reasoning chains are strictly grounded in visual evidence across the four clinical stages, and employ adversarial perturbations to test robustness against misleading cues. Med-R2 comprises 42,432 images, 31 task categories, and 110,406 QA pairs. Evaluation across 14 VLMs reveals a sequential performance degradation along the four-stage clinical workflow. Adversarial experiments show that models rely heavily on correct prompts to guess answers. Even when provided with explicit visual cues, the models struggle to accurately align textual descriptions. Finally, we demonstrate stepwise fine-tuning using our hierarchical data significantly improves reasoning robustness, highlighting its potential to drive future improvements in evidence-based medical AI.

Visual Question Answering (VQA) holds great promise for clinical support, particularly in ophthalmology, where retinal fundus photography is essential for diagnosis. However, ophthalmic VQA benchmarks primarily emphasize answer accuracy, neglecting the explicit visual evidence necessary for clinical interpretability. In this work, we introduce FundusGround, a new benchmark for clinically interpretable ophthalmic VQA with spatially-grounded lesion evidence. Specifically, we propose a three-stage pipeline that collects 10,719 fundus images with 15,595 image-level meticulously annotated lesions. To ensure anatomical consistency and clinical validity, all lesions are spatially localized using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid, enabling standardized mapping to nine clinically meaningful retinal regions. Built upon this structured lesion evidence, 72,706 questions are then generated spanning four formats: open-ended, closed-ended, single-choice, and multiple-choice. We further benchmark multiple general- and medical- large vision-language models using dual metrics for answer accuracy and lesion-level reasoning. The experiments demonstrate that incorporating lesion-level visual evidence consistently improves model performance and transparency, highlighting the necessity of explicit spatial grounding for reliable and explainable ophthalmic VQA.

We introduce JMed48k, a multi-profession Japanese healthcare licensing benchmark for evaluating vision-language models. Built from official PDF materials released by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, JMed48k contains 48,862 exam questions and 20,142 images from 11 national licensing examinations between 2005 and 2025, with visual content annotated under an 8-type taxonomy. From this corpus, we derive JMed48k-Eval, a recent five-year evaluation subset with 12,484 scored questions, including 9,905 text-only questions and 2,579 questions with images. We evaluate 21 proprietary, open-source, and medical-specific models, reporting text-only and with-image performance separately. Because these subsets contain different questions, we further introduce a paired image-removal audit that evaluates questions with images before and after removing visual content to explore four answer-transition states. The audit shows that proprietary and open source models gain substantially from images, whereas medical-specific systems show limited observable use of visual evidence, with many correct answers persisting after image removal. Even among proprietary models, the net image-removal effect varies sevenfold across professions, from +5.7 points on Physician questions to +39.8 points on Public Health Nurse questions. We release JMed48k to support reproducible, profession-stratified evaluation of vision-language models in medical licensing settings.

While medical Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in assisting diagnosis, they still frequently generate hallucinated responses that appear linguistically plausible but lack visual evidence. Such hallucinations pose risks to clinical decision-making and necessitate effective detection. Existing introspective detection methods primarily perform uncertainty estimation or logical verification by analyzing model responses conditioned on original or perturbed inputs. However, such external perturbations are often heuristic and context-agnostic, which overlooks the internal cross-modal dependency between generated tokens and related visual tokens during decoding. To address this issue, we propose VIHD, a Visual Intervention-based Hallucination Detection method that leverages targeted visual token masking to calibrate semantic entropy for more effective hallucination detection. VIHD locates visually dominant decoder layers via Visual Dependency Probing (VDP), executes Visual Intervention Decoding (VID) via token masking to calibrate the semantic distribution, and quantifies the resulting Calibrated Semantic Entropy (CSE) as a reliable hallucination signal. Extensive experiments on three medical VQA benchmarks with two medical MLLMs demonstrate that VIHD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, underscoring the importance of fine-grained visual dependency for hallucination detection. The code will be available at https://github.com/Jiayi-Chen-AU/VIHD

We present NeuroQA, a large-scale benchmark for visual question answering in 3D brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with 56,953 QA pairs from 12,977 subjects across 12 datasets. It spans ages 5-104 and five clinical domains: Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, tumors, white matter disease, and neurodevelopment. Unlike prior medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) efforts that operate on 2D slices or rely on narrow diagnostic labels, NeuroQA pairs every item with a full 3D volume. It evaluates 11 clinically grounded reasoning skills across Yes/No, multiple-choice, and open-ended formats. Of the 203 templates, 131 are image-grounded (answerable from a 3-plane viewer) and 72 are image-informed (ground truth from quantitative volumetry or clinical instruments). To remove text-only shortcuts, we apply answer-distribution refinement, reducing closed-format text-only accuracy from $>$80% to 44.6%; image necessity is assessed separately through an image-grounding protocol released with the benchmark. A 38-rule deterministic pipeline and two rounds of expert review verify every QA pair against FreeSurfer measurements, metadata, or radiology report fields, with zero same-subject contradictions across templates. We conduct a clinician evaluation in which two clinicians independently assess 100 frozen test items on a three-plane viewer. On closed-format (Yes/No + multiple-choice) test-public items, the best zero-shot vision-language model and a supervised 3D CNN baseline reach 47.5% and 43.7% accuracy respectively, both below the 49.4% text-only majority-template floor. NeuroQA adopts a two-tier release with public QA pairs for open-access datasets and reproducible generation scripts for datasets restricted by data use agreements (DUAs), plus subject-level splits, a held-out private test set, and an online leaderboard.

The growing adoption of AI in healthcare, particularly in preventive care, highlights the critical need for accessibility and precision in Medical Question Answering (MedQA). In recent years, significant efforts have been made to develop multi-span medical question-answering systems, where the answer to a query may span multiple sections or paragraphs of a source document. However, existing systems fall short of aligning with real-world scenarios, where source documents often include both textual and visual content, requiring answers to incorporate images for better comprehension. To address this gap, we propose $M^3QAFrame$, a multi-modal, multi-span medical question-answering framework that leverages visual cues to enhance the generation of comprehensive answers drawn from diverse textual and visual spans. The model takes the context, query, and images as input and outputs an answer containing both textual answers and relevant images. The text and image embeddings are processed using a transformer-based architecture to determine the sentence and image relevance. We curate a multi-modal, multi-span medical question-answering ($M^3 QuestionIng$) dataset containing queries, medical contexts, associated medical images, and extractive answers. Additionally, each query-answer pair is labeled with user intent and query type to enhance query and context comprehension. Extensive experiments show that our approach consistently outperforms existing methods across various evaluation metrics.

Small vision-language models (2-8B) are well-suited for clinical deployment due to privacy constraints, limited connectivity, and low-latency requirements favouring on-device or on-premise inference. However, their limited capacity exacerbates the generation of plausible but incorrect outputs. We extend game-theoretic decoding, previously restricted to text-only, closed-ended NLP tasks, to vision-language models for open-ended Medical VQA. We introduce a semantically aware Wasserstein stopping criterion that replaces lexical order matching, enabling convergence based on semantic consensus among near-synonymous candidate answers and avoiding unnecessary iterations caused by clinically equivalent ranking swaps. On VQA-RAD and PathVQA, we obtain consistent, statistically significant improvements over greedy and discriminative baselines. On VQA-RAD, we improve Qwen3-VL-2B by +3.5 percentage points (p < 0.01), surpassing the greedy 4B model, with similar trends at larger scales. On PathVQA, Gemma-3-4B with BDG matches MedGemma-4B under greedy decoding despite no domain-specific fine-tuning. At accuracy parity with classic BDG, the Wasserstein criterion reduces average convergence iterations by approximately 20%, improving inference efficiency while preserving the game-theoretic equilibrium behaviour. Code is available at https://github.com/luca-hagen/ Wasserstein-BDG-medical-VQA.

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have enabled general-purpose systems to demonstrate promising capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, including those in the medical domain. Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) has particularly benefited from these developments. However, despite Bangla being one of the most widely spoken languages globally, there exists no established MedVQA benchmark for it. To address this gap, we introduce BanglaMedVQA, a dataset comprising clinically validated image-question-answer pairs, along with a comprehensive evaluation of current foundation models on this resource. Consistent with prior findings that report low performance of current models on English MedVQA benchmarks, our analysis reveals that Bangla performance is substantially lower, reflecting the challenges inherent to low-resource languages. Even top-performing models such as Gemini and GPT-4.1 mini fail to accurately answer specialized diagnostic questions, indicating severe limitations in fine-grained medical reasoning. Although certain open-source models, such as Gemma-3, occasionally outperform these models in general categories, they too struggle with clinically complex questions, underscoring the urgent need for top-notch evaluation method.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) facilitate medical visual question answering (MedVQA) by jointly interpreting images and text. However, existing models typically depend on large architectures and closed-set answers, which limits their efficiency and potential clinical applicability. To overcome these shortcomings, we introduce RoiMAM, an efficient VLM. It integrates a training-free ROI Generation Module with Semantic Selective Suppression to focus on lesion-relevant regions, alongside a Text Prompt Enhancer module that provides modality-specific context without introducing training parameters. Compared to the widely used MedVInT-TD model, our design achieves efficient and accurate diagnosis at less than 20% of the model size, while improving accuracy by approximately 2% on SLAKE and 4.6% on PMC-VQA.

Self-verification, re-invoking the same vision language model (VLM) in a fresh context to check its own generated answer, is increasingly used as a default safety layer for medical visual question answering (VQA). We argue that this practice is fundamentally unreliable. We introduce [METHOD NAME], a diagnostic framework for mapping the reliability boundary of medical VLM self-verification by decomposing verifier behavior into discrimination capability and agreement bias. Because the verifier and answer generator are capacity-coupled, the verifier can overly agree with the generator, creating a verification mirage: a regime with both high verifier error and high agreement bias, driven by false acceptance of incorrect answers. Evaluating six open-weight VLMs across five medical VQA datasets and seven medical tasks, we find that this boundary is strongly task-conditioned. Knowledge-intensive clinical tasks fall deepest into the mirage, simpler tasks are more resistant, and perceptual tasks lie in between. Verification also fails to provide an independent safety signal: logistic mixed-effects analysis shows that verifier error and agreement bias become more likely when the generator is wrong, while saliency analyses show that verifiers under-attend to image evidence relative to generators, a phenomenon we call the lazy verifier. Cross-verification reduces but does not eliminate the mirage. Moreover, when verification is reused in multi-turn actor-verifier loops, most initially wrong answers become locked in by false verification. Since our experiments use clean benchmarks, the observed reliability boundary likely underestimates failures in real clinical deployment.

Cancer screening is a reasoning task. A radiologist observes findings, compares them to prior scans, integrates clinical context, and reaches a diagnostic conclusion confirmed by pathology. We present RadThinking, a Visual Question Answering (VQA) dataset that makes this reasoning explicit and trainable. RadThinking releases VQA pairs at three difficulty tiers. Foundation VQAs are atomic perception questions. Single-step reasoning VQAs apply one clinical rule. Compositional VQAs require multi-step chain-of-thought to reach a guideline category such as LI-RADS-5. For every compositional VQA, we release the chain of foundation VQAs that solves it. The chain follows the rules of the governing clinical reporting standard. The dataset spans 20,362 CT scans from 9,131 patients across 43 cancer groups, plus 2,077 verified healthy controls with >1-year follow-up. To our knowledge, RadThinking is the first cancer-screening VQA corpus that stratifies questions by reasoning depth and grounds compositions in clinical reporting standards. The foundation tier supplies atomic perception supervision. The compositional tier supplies chain-of-thought data and verifiable rewards for reinforcement-learning recipes such as DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1. RadThinking enables systematic training and evaluation of whether AI systems can reason about cancer, not merely detect it.

The reasoning gap between large and compact vision-language models (VLMs) limits the deployment of medical AI on portable clinical devices. Compact VLMs of 2--4B parameters can run on resource-constrained hardware but lack the multi-step reasoning capacity needed for interpretable clinical decision support. Existing knowledge distillation methods transfer answers without the reasoning process behind them. Medical visual question answering (VQA) serves as a testbed for this problem, as it requires models to integrate visual evidence with clinical knowledge through structured reasoning chains. We introduce LiteMedCoT-VL, a pipeline that transfers chain-of-thought reasoning from a 235B teacher model to 2B student models through LoRA-based fine-tuning on explanation-enriched training data. All inference is conducted without image captions by default, simulating the clinical scenario in which a physician interprets a medical image directly without an accompanying radiology report. On the PMC-VQA benchmark, LiteMedCoT-VL achieves 64.9% accuracy, exceeding the zero-shot Qwen3-VL-4B baseline of 53.9% by 11.0 percentage points and outperforming all published baselines. This result indicates that a 2B model with reasoning distillation can match or exceed models with twice the parameters. Visual grounding analysis shows that the model relies on image content rather than exploiting textual priors. Our code is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LiteMedCoT-VL.

Medical vision--language models (VLMs) are usually evaluated on intact image--question pairs, but trustworthy clinical use requires a stronger property: a model must recognise when the evidential basis for an answer has failed. We study this through silent failures under perturbed evidence, where a vision-required medical question is paired with a false premise, wording perturbation, knowledge-only rewrite, or ROI-corrupted image, yet the model returns a fluent non-refusal answer. We introduce medvigil, a 300-case evaluation suite drawn from four public medical VQA sources, supervised end to end by four board-certified radiologists: every gold answer, refusal option, candidate-answer set, paraphrase, false-premise trap, ROI box, and clinical risk tier is clinician-authored. Two attending radiologists annotate every case in parallel, a senior radiologist consolidates the released manifest, and a separate fourth radiologist independent of construction answers every probe to provide the human reference baseline. The release contains 2556 MCQ probes, 240 counterfactual triplets, physician-adjudicated risk-tier and answerability flags, ROI boxes, and a paired open-ended variant. We report seven correctness-conditioned audit metrics that summarise into the medvigil Composite Score (MCS), and audit 16 vision-capable models plus two text-only baselines. The independent radiologist scores MCS 83.3 at silent-failure rate 5.8%, leaving a 14.1-point composite headroom above the strongest audited model (Claude Opus 4.7 at 69.2). The benchmark and evaluation harness are publicly released.

Medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced image understanding and short-video analysis, but real clinical review often requires full-procedure video understanding. Unlike general long videos, medical procedures contain highly redundant anatomical views, while decisive evidence is temporally sparse, spatially subtle, and context dependent. Existing benchmarks often assume this evidence has already been localized through images, short clips, or pre-segmented videos, leaving the retrieval-before-reasoning problem under-tested. We introduce MedHorizon, an in-the-wild benchmark for long-context medical video understanding. MedHorizon preserves 759 hours of full-length clinical procedures and provides 1,253 evidence-grounded multiple-choice questionsthat jointly evaluate sparse evidence understanding and multi-hop clinical reasoning. Its evidence is extremely sparse, with only 0.166% evidence frames on average, requiring models to search noisy procedural streams before interpreting and aggregating findings. We evaluate representative general-domain, medical-domain, and long-video MLLMs. The best model reaches only 41.1% accuracy, showing that current systems remain far from robust full-procedure understanding. Further analysis yields four key findings: performance does not scale reliably with more frames, evidence retrieval and clinical interpretation remain primary bottlenecks; these bottlenecks are rooted in weak procedural reasoning and attention drift under redundancy, and generic sampling methods only partially balances local detail with global coverage. MedHorizon provides a rigorous testbed for MLLMs that retrieve sparse evidence and reason over complete clinical workflows.

Medical image super-resolution (MedSR) is essential for improving diagnostic precision across diverse imaging modalities such as MRI, CT, X-ray, Ultrasound, and Fundus imaging. Despite rapid advances in deep learning, challenges remain in preserving anatomical accuracy, maintaining perceptual quality, and generalizing across medical domains. This paper presents MedSR-Vision, a novel unified deep learning framework for evaluating and comparing super-resolution models across five modalities: Brain MRI, Chest X-ray, Renal Ultrasound, Nephrolithiasis CT, and Spine MRI, at magnification scales of $\times2$, $\times3$, and $\times4$. Three representative models namely SRCNN, SwinIR, and Real-ESRGAN are benchmarked using multiple quantitative metrics encompassing fidelity, perceptual realism, and sharpness. Experimental analysis demonstrates that Real-ESRGAN achieves superior perceptual quality and edge recovery at higher scales, SwinIR excels in preserving structural and diagnostic features, and SRCNN provides efficient and stable performance at lower magnifications. The results establish domain-specific insights and practical guidelines for model selection in clinical imaging workflows, offering a standardized evaluation framework for future medical image super-resolution research and deployment.

Purpose: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance in surgical visual question answering (VQA). However, existing surgical VQA datasets often contain linguistic shortcuts, where question phrasing implicitly constrains the answer space. It remains unclear whether reported performance reflects visual understanding or reliance on such linguistic shortcuts. Methods: We introduce SurgCheck, a diagnostic benchmark for quantifying linguistic shortcut reliance in surgical VQA. SurgCheck employs a paired-question design in which each surgical frame is associated with an original question containing entity names and a less-biased counterpart that removes these names while preserving identical visual content and ground-truth answers. The resulting performance gap provides a diagnostic signal of shortcut reliance. To ensure that the less-biased question remains well-defined even without entity names, four grounding cues are incorporated: bounding box, arrow, spatial position, and periphrasis. We evaluate both general-purpose and surgical-specific VLMs under zero-shot and fine-tuned settings on SurgCheck. To evaluate open-ended zero-shot responses, we introduce an LLM-as-a-judge evaluation protocol. Results: Using SurgCheck, we observe consistent performance degradation on less-biased questions across five VLMs, despite identical visual inputs. Text-only ablation reveals minimal performance drops for action and target prediction, indicating that action and target prediction is largely driven by linguistic shortcuts rather than visual reasoning. Conclusion: SurgCheck provides a controlled diagnostic framework that exposes failure modes masked by linguistic bias in existing surgical VQA benchmarks. Our findings demonstrate that strong benchmark performance does not necessarily imply faithful visual understanding, underscoring the need for bias-aware evaluation in surgical VQA.

The growing availability of health-related instructional videos creates new opportunities for clinical training, patient rehabilitation, and health education, yet existing retrieval systems remain largely single-turn: a user submits one query and receives one ranked list. This interaction is brittle in health scenarios, where information needs are often vague at first and become clinically meaningful only after follow-up constraints such as posture, hand placement, contraindications, equipment, or patient condition are specified. We introduce interactive multi-turn semantic retrieval for health videos and construct MHVRC, a Multi-Turn Health Video Retrieval Corpus, by combining video-grounded descriptions from VideoChat-Flash with query refinements generated by DeepSeek. We further propose DATR, a Dialogue-Aware Two-Stage Retrieval framework. DATR first performs efficient coarse retrieval with a CLIP-style dual encoder and sparse frame sampling, then re-ranks the top candidates through multi-turn query fusion and a lightweight cross-encoder scoring module. Experiments on MHVRC show consistent gains over strong text-video retrieval baselines, while user studies indicate that refined multi-turn queries better capture fine-grained procedural semantics than single-turn annotations. The work establishes a benchmark and a scalable technical recipe for interactive health video retrieval.

Medical retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems typically operate on text chunks extracted from biomedical literature, discarding the rich visual content (tables, figures, structured layouts) of original document pages. We propose MED-VRAG, an iterative multimodal RAG framework that retrieves and reasons over PMC document page images instead of OCR'd text. The system pairs ColQwen2.5 patch-level page embeddings with a sharded MapReduce LLM filter, scaling to ~350K pages while keeping Stage-1 retrieval under 30 ms via an offline coarse-to-fine index (C=8 centroids per page, ANN over centroids, exact two-way scoring on the top-R shortlist). A vision-language model (VLM) then iteratively refines its query and accumulates evidence in a memory bank across up to 3 reasoning rounds, with a single iteration costing ~15.9 s and the full three-round pipeline ~47.8 s on 4xA100. Across four medical QA benchmarks (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, MMLU-Med), MEDVRAG reaches 78.6% average accuracy. Under controlled comparison with the same Qwen2.5-VL-32B backbone, retrieval contributes a +5.8 point gain over the no-retrieval baseline; we also note a +1.8 point edge over MedRAG + GPT-4 (76.8%), with the caveat that this is a cross-paper rather than head-to-head comparison. Ablations isolate +1.0 from page-image vs text-chunk retrieval, +1.5 from iteration, and +1.0 from the memory bank.

Deploying vision-language models (VLMs) in clinical settings demands auditable behavior under realistic failure conditions, yet the failure landscape of frontier VLMs on specialized medical inputs is poorly characterized. We audit five recent frontier and grounding-aware VLMs (Gemini2.5Pro, GPT-5, o3, GLM-4.5V, Qwen2.5VL) on Medical VQA along two trust-relevant axes. Perception: all models localize anatomical and pathological targets poorly -- the best model reaches only 0.23 mean IoU and 19.1% Acc@0.5 -- and exhibit clinically dangerous laterality confusion. Pipeline integration: a self-grounding pipeline, where the same model localizes then answers, degrades VQA accuracy for every model -- driven by both inaccurate localization and format-compliance failures under the two-step prompt (parse failure rises to 70%--99% for Gemini and GPT-5 on VQA-RAD). Replacing predicted boxes with ground-truth annotations recovers and improves VQA accuracy, consistent with the failure residing in the perception module rather than in the decomposition itself. These observational findings identify grounding quality as a primary trustworthiness bottleneck in our SLAKE bounding-box setting. As a complementary fine-tuning follow-up, supervised fine-tuning of Qwen2.5VL on combined Med-VQA training data attains the highest reported SLAKE open-ended recall (85.5%) among comparable methods, suggesting that the VQA-level gap is tractable with domain adaptation; whether this also closes the perception/trustworthiness bottleneck is left to future work.

Visual state-space models (SSMs) have shown strong potential for medical image segmentation, yet their effectiveness is often limited by two practical issues: axis-biased scan ordering weakens the modeling of oblique and curved structures, and naive multi-branch fusion tends to amplify redundant responses. We present TopoMamba, a topology-aware scan-and-fuse framework for segmenting heterogeneous medical visual media. The method combines a diagonal/anti-diagonal TopoA-Scan branch with the standard Cross-Scan branch to provide complementary structural priors, and introduces ScanCache, a device-aware caching mechanism that amortizes explicit scan-index construction across recurring resolutions. To fuse heterogeneous scan features efficiently, we further propose a lightweight HSIC Gate that regulates branch interaction using a dependence-aware scalar gating rule. We also instantiate a volumetric TopoMamba-3D for practical 3D clinical segmentation. Experiments on Synapse CT, ISIC 2017 dermoscopy, and CVC-ClinicDB endoscopy show that TopoMamba consistently improves segmentation quality over strong CNN, Transformer, and SSM baselines, with particularly clear gains on thin or curved targets such as the pancreas and gallbladder, while maintaining favorable deployment efficiency under dynamic input resolutions. These results suggest that topology-aware scan ordering and lightweight dependence-aware fusion form an effective and practical design for medical multimedia segmentation. The code will be made publicly available.

Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) aims to generate clinically reliable answers conditioned on complex medical images and questions. However, existing methods often overfit to superficial cross-modal correlations, neglecting the intrinsic biases embedded in multimodal medical data. Consequently, models become vulnerable to cross-modal confounding effects, severely hindering their ability to provide trustworthy diagnostic reasoning. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Dual Causal Inference (DCI) framework for MedVQA. To the best of our knowledge, DCI is the first unified architecture that integrates Backdoor Adjustment (BDA) and Instrumental Variable (IV) learning to jointly tackle both observable and unobserved confounders. Specifically, we formulate a Structural Causal Model (SCM) where observable cross-modal biases (e.g., frequent visual and textual co-occurrences) are mitigated via BDA, while unobserved confounders are compensated using an IV learned from a shared latent space. To guarantee the validity of the IV, we design mutual information constraints that maximize its dependence on the fused multimodal representations while minimizing its associations with the unobserved confounders and target answers. Through this dual mechanism, DCI extracts deconfounded representations that capture genuine causal relationships. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets, SLAKE, SLAKE-CP, VQA-RAD, and PathVQA, demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing approaches, particularly in out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. Furthermore, qualitative analyses confirm that DCI significantly enhances the interpretability and robustness of cross-modal reasoning by explicitly disentangling true causal effects from spurious cross-modal shortcuts.