Multimodal Evaluation

Large language models are increasingly used in healthcare communication, yet most evaluations emphasize response quality while assuming that the user's concern has been interpreted correctly. We introduce HerHealthEval, a controlled evaluation framework for multilingual understanding of women's-health communication. For each clinical case, HerHealthEval provides matched versions in English, French, and Modern Standard Arabic using six communicative forms: canonical, clinical, layperson, indirect or hedged, emotionally concerned, and deliberately under-specified. The first five express the same underlying concern and retain the same clinical information, whereas the under-specified form intentionally omits relevant details to test whether the model recognizes that clarification is needed. We evaluate a multilingual instruction model and QLoRA-adapted variants on concern classification, risk calibration, clarification behavior, parse compliance, and cross-form consistency. Results reveal that aggregate accuracy and consistency can conceal safety-relevant failures. A multilingual adaptation model reaches 0.994 under-triage in French and Arabic under language-asymmetric risk supervision. A controlled re-adaptation using source-derived, language-invariant risk labels reduces under-triage to 0.572 and 0.558, respectively. These findings show that robust multilingual healthcare evaluation requires explicit testing of register variation, uncertainty handling, and the provenance and invariance of adaptation labels.

Automated video interview assessment integrates verbal content, acoustic delivery, and visual behavior, yet numerical predictions alone provide limited inspectable support. We present E-AVI, an evidence-grounded framework that extracts timestamped multimodal evidence and integrates dimension-conditioned evidence attention with source-level embeddings for scoring. A shared evidence pool further supports natural-language feedback and follow-up question answering. On RecruitView and a private hospitality dataset, E-AVI consistently outperforms fine-tuned multimodal baselines in rank correlation. Ablation, evidence-deletion, bootstrap, human-audit, and QA analyses characterize the predictive contribution, grounding, and practical utility of the evidence pathway. Together, these results demonstrate that our proposed E-AVI framework improves predictive performance while providing inspectable support for assessment, feedback, and interactive analysis.

This paper proposes a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for scientific image quality assessment, designed to simultaneously address both the understanding track (SIQA-U) and the scoring track (SIQA-S) of the SIQA challenge. We construct a multimodal index that integrates textual semantics with fine-grained visual features, and develop a multi-route retrieval and fusion mechanism to provide large language models with highly relevant reference cases, thereby enhancing their capability to evaluate complex scientific images. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively aligns with the judgment criteria of human experts. Ultimately, our method achieves 1st place in the SIQA-U track of the SIQA challenge at the ICME 2026 Grand Challenges.

Automated action quality assessment (AQA) in Olympic sports remains a challenging task due to the complexity of human motion and the subjectivity inherent in expert judging. This work evaluates the capability of open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to perform zero-shot action quality assessment on Olympic diving videos using the AQA-7 benchmark dataset. In this regard, a regression-based framework is pro-posed to leverage both the semantic reasoning and phase-level sub-scores generated by the VLMs, combining TF-IDF vectorization, dimensionality reduction, and ensemble learning to predict final competition scores. Experimental results show that standalone VLMs achieve moderate Spearman correlations below 0.32, while the proposed ensemble regression framework substantially improves performance in the reported evaluation, reaching a Spearman correlation of 0.67 with a four-model configuration. Textual reasoning features con-sistently outperformed raw numerical sub-scores, highlighting the richness of VLM-generated explanations for action quality analysis. These findings suggest that VLMs hold strong potential as assistive tools for explainable and semi-automated sports performance evaluation. The code is publicly available on GitHub https://github.com/hvelesaca/olympic diving judge vlm

Contact-rich physical human--robot interaction (pHRI) imposes time-varying demands associated with physical interaction, motor regulation, and physiological response, motivating continuous assessment of interaction workload. This paper presents an online multimodal assessment framework that integrates interaction wrench, planar tool-center-point (TCP) kinematics, and skin conductance level (SCL) into four interpretable workload-related factors. Their relative contributions are adjusted using path curvature to reflect changes in motion demand and task progression to account for gradual physiological variation over time. The framework was evaluated with 24 participants across 18 controlled combinations of temperature, acoustic noise, and illuminance under two admittance-control modes. Strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) evaluation used standardized pupil diameter ($\mathrm{PD}_z$) as an independent physiological reference and included comparisons with static variants and representative state-of-the-art learning-based baselines. The proposed framework achieves a cohort-mean $30\,\mathrm{s}$ block-wise Spearman correlation of $ρ_{30}=0.308$ with the physiological reference, with positive subject-level correspondence in 23 of 24 participants. Its overall performance is comparable to the state-of-the-art learning-based baseline. At the same time, our framework keeps the assessment process transparent through explicit workload-related factors and defined weighting rules, while outperforming the corresponding fixed-weight formulation. The framework also maintains consistent performance across the two tested admittance-control modes. These results support a transparent and interpretable approach to continuous interaction workload assessment in contact-rich pHRI.

Stress is a pervasive determinant of mental health and a key target for mobile health interventions. On-device language models (ODLMs) offer privacy-preserving inference without cloud dependency, yet their feasibility for health prediction under mobile resource constraints remains underexplored. We evaluate ODLMs for multi-modal stress prediction using zero-shot prompting, measuring predictive accuracy alongside latency and throughput. Our results show that objective sensor features marginally outperform subjective self-reports on average, and that lightweight sub-2B models achieve low latency with predictable resource usage. Our findings highlight both the promise and the practical constraints of ODLMs for mobile mental health.

Visual feedback in the form of user-uploaded images and videos is becoming increasingly common in e-commerce platforms because it provides authentic evidence of product quality, defects, packaging conditions, and real-world usage. However, visual feedback alone often lacks the contextual explanations and subjective opinions necessary for informed decision-making, while many users provide limited textual feedback due to the effort required to compose detailed reviews. To bridge this gap, we introduce image-grounded review assistance, a novel task that aims to generate editable review drafts from user-uploaded product images. Unlike conventional image captioning, which focuses on objective visual description, the proposed task requires product-specific understanding, sentiment estimation, and evidence-driven review composition under challenging real-world conditions, including degraded image quality, excessive zoom-in, target ambiguity, and partial product visibility. We propose a multi-agent vision-language framework consisting of four specialised roles: product grounding, visual sentiment estimation, visual evidence generation, and review synthesis. The framework employs explicit intermediate representations, including product entities, predicted ratings, and evidence summaries, to improve interpretability and visual grounding. Experiments on a curated subset of the Amazon Reviews Electronics dataset demonstrate the feasibility of generating coherent, product-aware, and sentiment-aware review drafts from visual feedback. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to formulate image-grounded review assistance as a multi-agent vision-language reasoning problem, providing a practical step toward AI-assisted review authoring in e-commerce systems.

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in image quality assessment (IQA) by bridging visual perception with descriptive evaluations. However, existing approaches mainly focus on holistic quality prediction, often functioning as black boxes that provide limited insight into where distortions occur and how they affect perceived quality, hindering fine-grained analysis of localized and heterogeneous degradations. We propose GS-IQA, a framework that reformulates IQA as a progressive Where--What--How diagnosis, emulating the human perceptual process from an initial glance to closer scrutiny. Since a severity judgment is meaningful only for a correctly localized and recognized region, we realize this progression through a two-stage reinforcement learning paradigm that respects such dependencies: the glance stage uses a perception-gated reward to establish where degradations lie and what they are, activating severity feedback only once both are correct, while the scrutiny stage introduces online reward-conditioned degradation generation to synthesize hard examples targeted at the model's perceptual bottlenecks, sharpening its discrimination of subtle severity variations. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct Diag-Bench, a region-level IQA benchmark of about 25K curated samples spanning 12 distortion types and five ordinal severity levels. Extensive experiments show that GS-IQA consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods in distortion localization, recognition, and severity estimation, and that its diagnostic representations transfer effectively to conventional global quality prediction across diverse external benchmarks. Code and data will be released.

Objective assessment of surgical technical skill is important for surgical training and structured feedback, but current workflows remain dependent on labor-intensive expert review. Existing automated approaches primarily focus on visual inputs and provide limited support for jointly studying operative performance, structured skill scores, and evaluator feedback. We introduce SurgSkill-Bench, an initial video-score-text benchmark-style dataset containing 214 surgical training simulation videos, six-dimensional OSATS scores, and expert free-text comments. We define two evaluation settings: video-only OSATS prediction for automated assessment and post hoc expert-comment-assisted prediction, where evaluator comments are available as auxiliary information. We provide controlled baseline experiments using representative frozen visual backbones, content-adaptive key-frame sampling, and a simple video-text co-attention fusion module. Under internal video-level validation, content-adaptive sampling improves video-only performance in this dataset, while evaluator comments provide additional score-related signal in the assisted setting. The best mean AUROC reaches 0.88 under dataset-specific median dichotomization. We further discuss evaluation constraints related to dataset scale, metadata completeness, and the interpretation of comment-assisted prediction. Code will be released publicly at a later date.

We present an overview of the ImageEval 2026 shared task on culturally grounded Arabic multimodal evaluation. It includes two tasks: (i) AynVQA, covering spoken visual question answering and image-grounded hallucination detection in English and Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), and (ii) CRAI-Bench, evaluating the cultural accuracy of text-to-image generation. A total of 14 teams participated in the test phase, with 12 teams submitting system description papers. Participating systems used a range of approaches, including zero-shot prompting, fine-tuning of vision-language models, speech-recognition pipelines, ensembling, and score calibration. We describe the task setup, datasets, evaluation procedure, and participating systems, and summarize the main results across the different tracks. All datasets and evaluation scripts from the shared task are released to the research community. The shared task highlights the challenges of culturally grounded multimodal evaluation, particularly for Arabic speech and image-text reasoning.

Fitness Action Quality Assessment (AQA) is important for intelligent sports training, yet the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in this setting remain underexplored. Existing benchmarks rely on action-specific annotation schemes and focus primarily on final assessment outputs, offering limited insight into how models assess exercise quality. We introduce FitAQA, a systematic benchmark for evaluating MLLMs in fitness AQA, containing 2,219 videos and 5,512 QA instances across 30 bodyweight exercises. In collaboration with experts in sports science, we develop a unified form error taxonomy that defines 38 recurring form errors within six complementary quality dimensions: alignment, symmetry, stability, coordination, tempo, and completeness. This taxonomy provides a shared assessment framework across different exercises. FitAQA further formulates three evaluation tasks: perception for recognizing relevant visual evidence, judgement for combining that evidence with domain knowledge to assess execution correctness, and temporal grounding for localizing form errors over time. Extensive evaluation shows that current MLLMs still struggle to assess exercise quality comprehensively and localize form errors precisely. Controlled experiments further indicate that visual perception is a key bottleneck, as judgement performance improves substantially when ground-truth perceptual evidence is provided. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Kelly0510/FitAQA.

Visual perception of walkability varies substantially across individuals, reflecting differences in personal characteristics, experiences, and preferences. Existing studies, however, often reduce these diverse judgements to aggregated scores, implicitly assuming uniform perception, and commonly rely on vehicle-mounted street-view imagery that does not reflect the pedestrian's visual experience. This paper introduces a dataset of 29,870 walkability ratings from 1,196 respondents, linking sidewalk-view imagery across urban, suburban, and regional Australian environments with individual rater attributes, and proposes the first user-conditioned multimodal deep learning framework for walkability perception, fusing visual features with respondent-level representations. A viewpoint-comparison study shows that sidewalk-view images receive significantly higher walkability ratings than matched street-view images, indicating that imagery source is a substantive design decision in perception surveys. The user-conditioned model improves rank agreement with observed ratings by 65% over an image-only baseline (quadratic weighted kappa 0.47 vs. 0.29), demonstrating that who is evaluating an environment carries predictive indication beyond image content alone. These findings support moving from aggregated, observer-independent walkability scores toward models that represent diverse users, enabling more inclusive assessment of pedestrian environments.

Scientific images are essential for communicating experimental observations, quantitative evidence and conceptual knowledge. Unlike natural images, their quality depends on both visual clarity and scientific informativeness, making assessment challenging. In this work, we present SciQNet, a two-stage multimodal adaptation framework for scientific image quality assessment. The first stage performs domain-adaptive pretraining on scientific document images and the second stage conducts task-specific fine-tuning with joint scoring and understanding supervision. For scoring-oriented supervision, we combine instruction tuning with a Huber loss derived from rating-word logits, while understanding-oriented supervision is formulated as multiple-choice visual question answering. Experiments show that using a 40% stratified subset of the domain-adaptive data gives the best performance among the evaluated pretraining fractions, suggesting that pretraining-data relevance may be as important as pretraining-data scale. The final model achieves an SIQA-S score of 92.21, an SIQA-U score of 47.38 and a combined score of 69.80. This work presents our solution to the ICME 2026 Scientific Image Quality Assessment Challenge, which ranked 2nd in the scoring track.

Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) are subtle behavioural states that may be expressed through language, voice, facial activity, and other non-verbal cues. The ABAW11 A/H Video Recognition Challenge asks systems to assign a binary A/H label to each naturalistic interview video. Performance is measured using Macro-F1 so that recognition of both A/H and No-A/H samples receives equal importance. We present CALM-AH, a multimodal ensemble that combines textual, acoustic, visual, and derived behavioural-statistical features. We construct 15 non-empty combinations of these feature branches. For each combination, we select the best of three classifier families using validation binary cross-entropy and optimise its decision threshold for validation Macro-F1. The resulting binary decisions are combined using fixed hard-voting weights transferred from BROTHER. We further introduce Reliability-Gated Multi-Expert Consensus(RG-MEC), an anchor-preserving decision-level ensemble that combines an initial prediction with three complementary correction experts: CALM-AH, AffectGPT, and a GPT-based semantic verifier. The initial system provides the default prediction. Its label is overridden only when all three correction experts unanimously support the same alternative class; otherwise, the anchor prediction is retained. This unanimity-gated design limits the influence of isolated expert errors while permitting bidirectional correction when task-specific, multimodal-affective, and semantic-pragmatic evidence are fully consistent. On the participant-disjoint ABAW11 dataset, CALM-AH achieves a Macro-F1 of 0.7525, and the complete RG-MEC system achieves 0.7771.

Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy. However, if we apply traditional image assessment methods to scientific figure quality assessment, limitations emerge: classic IQA models capture perceptual quality or aesthetics but cannot judge whether a figure serves the paper's scientific argument; CLIP-based methods assess generic image-text correspondence, yet lack understanding of manuscript context; and zero-shot LLM/VLM judges, when repurposed for figure scoring, often yield overly concentrated scores with limited fusion of visual and textual evidence. We introduce an annotated dataset of 3,857 scientific figures from peer-reviewed conference papers, each rated along four peer-review-oriented dimensions: Clarity, Relevance, Informativeness, and Structure. We propose SciFigAlign, a fine-tuned multimodal scorer that grounds figure quality assessment in manuscript evidence. Given a figure crop, caption, citing paragraphs, and light paper context, SciFigAlign fine-tunes CLIP and SciBERT end-to-end with per-modality cross-attention and CubeMLP fusion, jointly optimizing SmoothL1 regression with a within-paper ranking hinge loss. Under paper-level splits, SciFigAlign achieves a macro MAE of 0.3524 and a within-paper pairwise accuracy of 81.64% on the test set with n = 396, a 59% relative error reduction over the best LLM-as-judge baseline with MAE 0.864. Ablations confirm that manuscript-grounded inputs, citing-context denoising, and ranking supervision are all critical, showing that scientific figure assessment requires learned alignment between visual content and manuscript evidence rather than prompting alone, even with state-of-the-art VLMs.

3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has emerged as an effective representation for novel view synthesis and 3D scene reconstruction, creating an increasing demand for reliable quality assessment. Unlike conventional image quality assessment (IQA), the quality of a 3DGS scene depends not only on the perceptual fidelity of rendered views, but also on scene-level factors such as spatial structure and cross-view consistency. Existing IQA methods are limited by their reliance on 2D perceptual cues, whereas general multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are not designed for stable quality regression and may produce unreliable judgments. To address these limitations, a multimodal quality assessment framework is developed for 3DGS scene understanding. First, a 3D-aware quality representation learning framework is introduced by augmenting a VGGT-based encoder with a dedicated quality head. Multi-view images are encoded into view-specific features and aggregated to capture cross-view consistency, while geometric cues are incorporated through joint modeling of depth and point-cloud-related structural information, enabling the learning of structure-aware quality representations beyond appearance-driven features. Second, a grounded multimodal reasoning mechanism is constructed by jointly feeding original images, depth maps, point cloud renderings, and camera parameters into a Qwen-based MLLM.

Rehabilitation scoring systems are most useful when their outputs can be reviewed and interpreted within clinical workflows. This study presents PhaseAware, a compact framework for continuous rehabilitation quality assessment that combines a temporal backbone with phase- and body-group descriptors through a backbone-conditioned gated residual pathway. The model was evaluated on the UI-PRMD deep-squat protocol and further tested on the KIMORE squatting subset. On UI-PRMD, PhaseAware achieved an RMSE of 0.0230, corresponding to an 88.9% reduction relative to the accepted baseline. It also maintained favorable performance on KIMORE, suggesting that the phase-aware design transfers across related squatting protocols. In addition to score prediction, PhaseAware generates structured review cues based on phase- and body-level sensitivity, highlighting the movement stages and body regions most relevant to each prediction. The architecture employs a backbone-conditioned gated residual mechanism to stabilize feature representation, supporting use in resource-constrained settings. These cues are intended to support clinician review, boundary-case monitoring, and human-in-the-loop triage rather than autonomous decision-making. Overall, PhaseAware offers a practical and interpretable approach to rehabilitation scoring that may help integrate automated assessment into information systems while preserving clinician oversight.

Preference over model-generated emotion descriptions is emerging as a standard evaluation metric for multimodal emotion understanding, exemplified by the MER2026 MER-Prefer track on EmoPrefer. Such benchmarks assume that predicting the preferred description requires grounded cross-modal understanding of the video. We conduct a systematic shortcut audit of EmoPrefer using content-blind probes. A simple logistic regression using only description length and generator identity, without processing the text, video, or audio, performs comparably to LoRA-finetuned 7B text and audio-visual judges (65.8 versus 66.8 WAF on EmoPrefer-V2). Generator identity is recoverable from description text with 99.5 percent accuracy, every candidate pair contrasts two distinct generators, and the human preference labels agree with a fold-exclusive per-generator win-rate prior on 66 percent of the evaluated pairs. When the human label conflicts with this prior, trained judges still follow the style prior on 63 to 80 percent of the pairs. On a length-matched subset that neutralizes verbosity bias, the tested media configurations yield no statistically significant improvement, while an ODIN-inspired diagnostic that decouples the style shortcut leaves its content head near chance. These results do not imply that human preferences are inherently stylistic or that the descriptions contain no emotional information. Instead, they show that the current scores can be reached without verifying either description against the video. We recommend source-balanced pairing, strict length control, counter-stereotypical sliced reporting, and multi-annotator consensus for future cross-generator evaluations. Code is available at https://github.com/jiabingyang01/EmoPrefer-Audit.

AI-generated human-centric videos play a crucial role in a wide range of modern applications. However, they often suffer from quality issues and semantic mismatches, underscoring the importance of effective quality assessment for such videos. To this end, we extend our previous dataset HVEval with pairwise preference annotations, resulting in HVEval+, the largest holistic quality assessment dataset for AI-generated human-centric videos, which comprises 1k prompts based on a comprehensive taxonomy, 20k videos generated by 24 text-to-video (T2V) models, and extensive human annotations, including 60k mean opinion scores (MOSs) and 60k preference pairs across 3 dimensions (i.e., spatial quality, temporal quality, and text-video correspondence), as well as 20k category-specific question-answer (Q&A) pairs. Along with the HVEval+ dataset, we further propose MoE-Rater, a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-inspired and multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based all-in-one method that supports multi-dimensional quality rating, multi-dimensional pairwise comparison, and category-specific question answering within a single model. Specifically, we introduce Mixture of Projector Experts (MoPE) and Mixture of LoRA Experts (MoLE), together with a three-stage training strategy consisting of task-aware pre-training, task-specific adaptation, and adaptive routing optimization, to effectively unify multiple tasks, resulting in superior performance on both HVEval+ and Human-AGVQA datasets. Extensive experiments and comprehensive analysis demonstrate the significant potential of the HVEval+ dataset and the MoE-Rater method in advancing AI-generated video quality assessment and further facilitating the evaluation and optimization of T2V models.

As Text-to-Image (T2I) systems rapidly advance, evaluating the cultural authenticity of synthesized content has become increasingly important for fair and trustworthy generative AI. Existing T2I evaluation metrics and multimodal judges often rely on visual-semantic representations that underrepresent implicit cultural norms, leading to biased preference judgments and the omission of fine-grained cultural cues. In addition, visual question answering (VQA)-based evaluators typically depend on autoregressive text generation, which limits their scalability for real-time reward modeling. To address these limitations, we introduce an Implicit Cultural Alignment Reward Model built upon a lightweight 4.2-billion-parameter Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM). Our framework integrates an Implicit Cultural Probe with a Skip-connection Cross-Attention (SkipCA) mechanism, enabling late-stage semantic features to directly attend to early-stage visual representations and better preserve culturally salient details. Evaluations on 3,323 challenging and carefully curated image pairs from the CulturalFrames benchmark show that our approach achieves 83.49% pairwise accuracy, with Pearson and Kendall correlation coefficients of 0.5268 and 0.3749, respectively, outperforming representative vision-language metrics and MLLM-based evaluators. Moreover, by bypassing autoregressive text generation, our model processes each evaluation in 0.21 seconds under our local inference setup, achieving a $10\times$ speedup over standard VQA-based evaluators. These results suggest that the proposed reward model can provide an efficient and culturally aware scalar signal for preference optimization pipelines such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Direct Preference Optimization. Additional resources are available on our project page at https://bensonch1214.github.io/Implicit_Cultural_Alignment/.

Accurate determination of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resectability relies on evaluating how the tumor interacts with major peripancreatic vessels on CT imaging, yet expert assessment often shows substantial variability. We introduce a fully automated multimodal deep learning framework that jointly analyzes 3D contrast enhanced CT and structured clinical information to classify patients into the three National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) resectability categories (upfront resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced). The approach uses a Swin-UNETR backbone to obtain anatomy aware image representations through auxiliary segmentation of pancreas, tumor, and vascular structures. These features are fused with a compact clinical embedding derived from 17 routinely collected variables and processed by a lightweight classification head. Model training is guided by a dynamic multitask objective that adapts the balance between segmentation and classification based on current tumor Dice performance, promoting feature representations that remain both anatomically informed and discriminative.

Action Quality Assessment (AQA) aims to evaluate how well a person performs a movement, which is essential in applications such as sports scoring, skill assessment, and healthcare. However, unimodal approaches often struggle to capture subtle cues of movement quality in real-world settings. Although multi-modal inputs provide complementary information, existing methods still face two major challenges: heterogeneous modalities often lead to cross-modal misalignment and unstable fusion, and reliable multi-modal annotation is costly, resulting in limited dataset diversity. To address these challenges, we propose DualAlign, a two-stage multi-modal fusion framework with adaptive alignment. The framework first constructs a coherent visual representation by maximizing shared structural information across RGB video, optical flow, and skeleton modalities. Textual semantics are then incorporated after visual stabilization, allowing high-level descriptions to complement rather than distort the underlying visual manifold. To evaluate the framework under realistic multi-modal conditions, we introduce MM--JDM, a movement-quality assessment dataset integrating RGB videos, optical flow, skeleton sequences, and structured text. MM--JDM naturally exhibits modality noise, class imbalance, and label scarcity, making it a challenging benchmark for studying multi-modal fusion and alignment. Extensive experiments show that DualAlign improves average correlation on MM--JDM by 21.16% over the state-of-the-art methods and achieves gains of 3.53% and 5.95% on the RG and Fis-V benchmarks, respectively. DualAlign also remains robust under missing-modality and label-scarce conditions.

Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances, and cultural taboos, leaving Vision-Language Models (VLMs) vulnerable in global deployments. We introduce Pluralis v0.1: a novel multimodal, multi-regional, and multilingual dataset built from a culture-first perspective. Spanning 6,448 prompts across six Asia-Pacific countries (Bangladesh, India, Korea, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan) and eight languages, Pluralis diverges from prior work by natively sourcing localized safety hazards rather than adapting Western datasets. Crucially, it introduces a multimodal evaluation paradigm: user text (e.g., "Should I gift this?") and an image referring to "this" (e.g., a clock) - both innocuous in isolation, but synergistically triggering specific legal or cultural violations. Pluralis disentangles universal safety violations from localized cultural appropriateness, establishing the latter as a first-class evaluation axis. To operationalize this, we present Judge-Pluralis, an agreement-gated LLM-as-a-Judge ensemble trained on examples classified in an empirically derived cultural taxonomy. Observing VLM behavior on a subset of the Pluralis surfaces recurring, locale-specific failure modes such as image misidentifications with downstream harm, missed item-context-locale interactions, and inadequate refusals. These failure modes vary systematically across locales and languages, exposing blind spots that globally averaged metrics conceal. Ultimately, Pluralis is not presented as a solved evaluation framework for cultural alignment, but rather as a first step and catalyst for future innovation. We call upon the research community to utilize this foundation to advance the science of multilingual, multicultural evaluation to better support AI cultural alignment globally.

Video quality assessment (VQA) plays a critical role in optimizing video delivery systems. While numerous objective metrics have been proposed to approximate human perception, the perceived quality strongly depends on viewing conditions and display characteristics. Factors such as ambient lighting, display brightness, and resolution significantly influence the visibility of distortions. In this work, we address the question of the multi-screen quality assessment on mobile devices, as this area still tends to be under-covered. We introduce a first large-scale subjective dataset collected across more than different 300 Android devices, accompanied by metadata on viewing conditions and display properties. We propose a strategy for aggregated score extraction and adaptation of VQA models to device-specific quality estimation. Our results demonstrate that incorporating device and context information enables more accurate and flexible quality prediction, offering new opportunities for fine-grained optimization in streaming services. Ultimately, this work advances the development of perceptual quality models that bridge the gap between laboratory evaluations and the diverse conditions of real-world media consumption. We made the dataset and the code available at https://videoprocessing.github.io/device-viewing-conditions.

Benchmarking immersive media coding solutions, especially in the standardization context, requires reliable and reproducible subjective quality assessment (QA) procedures, along with objective quality metrics that remain accurate across different distortion types. This paper presents a standardized workflow for light field QA, developed and deployed in the context of JPEG Pleno standardization activities, which integrates benchmark generation, a hybrid subjective evaluation, and objective metric analysis into a common workflow. The benchmark is designed to encompass not only traditional coding-only artifacts but also distortions that arise in processing pipelines in which light field encoding is accompanied with view synthesis and reconstruction techniques. A hybrid subjective method is proposed enabling fine-grained assessment by combining reference-anchored quality rating with targeted pairwise refinement in perceptually ambiguous regions. The reliability of subjective scores is verified using statistical consistency analyses between observers of two cohorts. Finally, a large set of objective metrics is systematically evaluated in terms of global prediction accuracy, local agreement in ambiguous quality regions, and robustness across distortion families. The results show that several metrics achieve strong agreement for coding-only stimuli, but their performance consistently drops when view synthesis distortions are included. The analysis further highlights the importance of view-pooling strategy in the design of future light field quality metrics. The work provides a reproducible and standardization-ready framework for fine-grained light field QA, while identifying key limitations of current objective metrics under emerging coding pipelines. The subjectively annotated dataset is publicly available at https://plenodb.jpeg.org/lfqa/objectivecfp.

University stakeholders often face difficulties in accessing timely and reliable information, especially in developing countries, where there are very few intelligent support systems. Existing rule-based chatbots are unable to handle complex, domain-specific queries and are not well-equipped to adapt to evolving institutional policies. As a fill-in-the-gap solution, we present the multimodal university chatbot with retrieval-augmented generation. The system combines the large language model with semantic retrieval to produce context-based responses from institution-centric resources, such as the university handbook. The system accepts text and image queries through the vision-language model and applies quantized inference for rapid deployment on constrained hardware. A scalable backend built with FastAPI, adjoined with a responsive frontend developed with Next.js, ensures real-time usability. Our multimodal evaluation demonstrates that the system maintains strong satisfaction scores across both text and image queries, despite increased response time for visual inputs. Furthermore, quantitative evaluation shows that hallucination is reduced from 31.7% to 6.6% in our proposed RAG-based system, confirming the effectiveness of retrieval grounding.

We introduce PerceptionRubrics, a rubric-based evaluation framework that addresses the gap between saturated benchmark scores and real-world brittleness. Shifting evaluation from holistic semantic matching to rigorous atomic auditing, PerceptionRubrics pairs 1,038 information-dense images with over 10,000 instance-specific rubrics. These criteria are derived from golden captions constructed via a novel Circular Peer-Review consensus pipeline and then distilled into a dual-stream system of Must-Right (essential facts) and Easy-Wrong (fine-grained details) rubrics. Crucially, PerceptionRubrics implements a Gated Scoring mechanism: unlike linear averages, failure on mandatory visual facts triggers sharp binary penalties. Extensive evaluation yields critical insights: (1) The Reliability Gap: models often verify fragmented elements correctly yet fail strict conjunctive constraints, exposing brittleness in dense domains; (2) Open-Closed Stratification: contrary to reasoning trends, we reveal a persistent 8% perception deficit between open-source and proprietary frontiers; and (3) Human-Aligned Rigor: our gated metrics substantially out-align conventional benchmarks, validating that strict perceptual fidelity is the prerequisite for reliable generation.

Vision-based assessment can provide convenient and cost-effective evaluation in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) rehabilitation training, where action quality assessment (AQA) from computer vision offers a promising solution. Existing automatic AQA frameworks for physical therapy typically rely on skeletal data captured from a single viewpoint, which is inefficient for TCM techniques such as acupuncture or Tuina that involve dense hand self-occlusion and complex hand-object interactions. To address these challenges, we propose CME-AQA, a cross-view, multimodal vision-based assessment framework that integrates visual-pose fusion to enhance understanding of environmental context and leverages both first-person and third-person videos during training to improve inference robustness. We collected two dual-view datasets, TCM-AQA61-A (Acupuncture) and TCM-AQA61-T (Tuina), each containing synchronized first-person and third-person recordings of 61 subjects with expert annotations. Experimental results show that our approach achieves superior or comparable mean performance against competitive baselines, achieving over 10% relative improvement in weighted F1 over the best competing method on key rating tasks such as Needle Depth and Quick Needle Insertion, while also reducing mean absolute error in quantitative measures such as insertion time and manipulation frequency. Testing on a CPR dataset further demonstrates comparable performance on several posture-based criteria, suggesting applicability to related structured simulated clinical skill assessments where participant motion is central to evaluation. Overall, CME-AQA enhances assessment accuracy for structured TCM rehabilitation training and facilitates more convenient and effective training-oriented skill evaluation.

Existing facial expression quality assessment (FEQA) methods typically produce only a severity score, without explicitly communicating the observable facial motion evidence that supports the prediction. This limits interpretability and makes it difficult to inspect the basis of model outputs in Parkinson's disease assessment. To address this gap, we propose TraMP-LLaMA, a unified multimodal framework that jointly predicts severity scores and generates structured textual reports from facial motion cues. The framework integrates RGB appearance and landmark trajectory cues, and adopts a decoupled instruction-tuning strategy to reduce task interference between severity prediction and language generation. To support this task, we further extend the PFED5 dataset with expert-guided textual motion descriptions and construct PFED5-plus. Experiments on PFED5-plus show that TraMP-LLaMA outperforms competitive video-language baselines in report generation and achieves the best severity prediction performance among the compared methods under joint multi-expression training, improving Spearman's rank correlation by at least 4.39 percent over all competing methods. The text annotations and code are available at https://github.com/shuchaoduan/TraMP-LLaMA.

Multimedia event extraction aims to jointly identify events and their arguments across multiple modalities, such as text and images, to support more comprehensive event understanding. While recent work reports steady and substantial progress, the reliability and comparability of these results critically depend on consistent and rigorous evaluation. In this work, we present the first systematic analysis of evaluation pitfalls in multimedia event extraction and identify three major sources of issues: inconsistent data processing, inconsistent task assumptions, and overly relaxed evaluation settings. We demonstrate, through a series of controlled experiments under a strict evaluation framework, that minor evaluation choices can cause large performance variations and lead to overestimation of a model's ability to ground real-world events across modalities. Our findings highlight the need for comparable evaluation standards and encourage a shift toward more rigorous evaluation in multimedia event extraction.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery improves surgical precision but introduces complexity, making technical error detection essential for ensuring patient safety. Current executional error detection methods using video data often overlook fine-grained contextual descriptions of activities and error types within the hierarchical structure of surgical procedures. They also under-utilize complementary multimodal information. We propose a unified framework for executional error detection that leverages multimodal input, including video, kinematics, and descriptive textual prompts. Through activity prompting, we integrate descriptive language in gesture-level activities, instrument-object interactions, and error definitions. We also introduce activity-aware visual embeddings derived from vision encoders pretrained on surgical activity labels to compare the effectiveness of contrastive language-image embeddings with traditional image-based embeddings for error detection. By seamlessly integrating kinematic data with video and textual modalities, our framework significantly improves error detection performance. Achieving up to 5% and 16.6% F1 score improvements over state-of-the-art baselines on the JIGSAWS and SAR-RARP50 datasets, respectively, we demonstrate the value of combining curated textual prompts with multimodal data for accurate error detection.

Chronic wound assessment remains a clinically challenging task that requires accurate interpretation of wound morphology, tissue composition, vascular characteristics, and infection risk. Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have introduced the possibility of automated multimodal wound analysis through image understanding combined with clinical reasoning. This study evaluates the performance of several general-purpose and medically specialized open-source and proprietary VLMs for clinical wound assessment using an expanded, curated dataset of 20 clinically diverse wounds spanning vascular, surgical, ischemic, venous, lymphedema, and amputation-related etiologies. Six VLMs were evaluated using a structured twelve-question clinical framework covering wound classification, infection risk, vascular intervention recommendations, debridement urgency, wound therapy selection, and advanced management planning. Across 20 wound cases and 240 clinician-graded wound-analysis decisions, ChatGPT achieved the highest overall performance with 174/240 correct responses (72.50%), followed by Claude with 149/240 (62.08%). Among the open-source and medically specialized models, HuluMed achieved the strongest performance with 96/240 correct responses (40.00%), followed by Gemma 3 (81/240, 33.75%), MedGemma 4B (62/240, 25.83%), and MedGemma 27B (42/240, 17.50%). The findings suggest that frontier general-purpose multimodal systems currently demonstrate substantially stronger wound-analysis performance than medically specialized alternatives, highlighting the continued importance of broad multimodal reasoning capabilities alongside domain-specific medical knowledge. Although current VLMs demonstrate promising potential for clinical decision support, substantial limitations remain in advanced wound-management reasoning, procedural planning, and autonomous clinical reliability.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been increasingly adopted for Image Quality Assessment (IQA). However, current methods typically employ a static one-shot scoring paradigm, despite the fact that humans assess image quality through dynamic visual inspection, e.g., selectively adjusting views to verify details and subtle artifacts. Specifically, relying solely on a single-pass observation introduces two primary limitations: first, perceiving the image only at a global scale restricts the assessment of finer local details; second, the original intensity distribution of the image may overwhelm the visibility, leading to insufficient inspection of image quality. To address these issues, we propose Tool-IQA, shifting the assessment mechanism from passive scoring to a tool-augmented workflow. In particular, we equip VLMs with simple yet effective view tools: a Magnifier to inspect local details, and a Gamma Corrector to uncover visibility and hidden artifacts. The assessment follows a structured pipeline that consists of an initial observation with rubric notes, a tool-augmented in-depth inspection, and a final quantification for calibrated quality score. Furthermore, to ensure efficient and purposeful tool callings, we introduce a batch-aware training strategy to reward tool interactions that can yield positive contributions rather than simply encouraging usage. Experiments on a variety of IQA benchmarks demonstrate that, with effective tool calling and calibrated assessment, our proposed Tool-IQA significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art models, e.g., it achieves a PLCC of 0.854 on the challenging CLIVE dataset.

Personality assessment aims to infer stable personality traits from dynamic behaviors across language, voice, and facial cues. Since different personality dimensions are revealed through distinct behavioral perspectives, modeling trait-specific evidence is challenging. However, most existing approaches adopt a uniform multimodal fusion strategy across all dimensions, assuming identical modality contributions. This overlooks trait-specific modality preferences and introduces cross-modal interference. To address this issue, we propose a novel personality assessment framework called Traits Run Deeper, which consists of three components. Specifically, the Multimodal Foundation Representation (MFR) module constructs personality-oriented multimodal inputs and leverages psychology-informed semantic templates as anchors, enabling foundation models to capture trait-relevant information. Building upon MFR, the Trait-Specific Modality Fusion (TSMF) module acts as an asymmetric fusion mechanism, allowing each dimension to selectively exploit different modality pathways from modality-specific modeling to complementary fusion. Thus, TSMF captures heterogeneous modality preferences while reducing cross-modal contamination. Furthermore, the Distribution-Calibrated Personality Regression (DCPR) module mitigates label imbalance and central tendency bias through target distribution calibration, improving robustness and stability. Experimental results on the AVI Challenge 2026 validation set demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, reducing mean squared error (MSE) by approximately 25% compared with the baseline. Consistent improvements are observed on the official test set, where our method achieves the best performance and ranks first in the Personality Assessment Track. The source code will be made available at https://github.com/MSA-LMC/AVI2026.

Traditional Video Quality Assessment (VQA) focuses narrowly on aesthetic fidelity, overlooking the complex social dynamics that define quality in User-Generated Content (UGC). In this work, we propose a paradigm shift from signal-centric metrics to human-centric resonance assessment. We introduce CASTER (Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance), a new task that evaluates whether a UGC item achieves positive community resonance based on its multimodal attributes rather than visual quality alone. To address this, we present MEDEA (Multimodal Engagement-Driven Evaluation Architecture), which introduces a novel Social Chain-of-Thought (Social-CoT) mechanism. Unlike traditional logical CoT, Social-CoT performs multimodal perspective-taking, instantiating diverse viewer personas to simulate collective cognitive and emotional reactions (i.e., the "community mind") before deriving a quality judgment. MEDEA is trained via a two-stage approach involving supervised fine-tuning and process-supervised reinforcement learning with Social Alignment Reward to ensure reasoning paths are grounded in authentic human social cognition. To support this task, we release CASTER-Bench, a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark covering diverse UGC categories. Experiments demonstrate that MEDEA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on CASTER-Bench while providing interpretable and empathetic reasoning paths that align with real community feedback.

Educational platforms often predict student performance from prior interactions, but the assessment content itself also varies in linguistic and visual complexity. This paper studies whether lightweight content features extracted from CourseKata chapter-review questions improve prediction of end-of-chapter quiz scores beyond a student's average prior exercise performance. The study combines 2023 CourseKata student response data with chapter-level text features from review-question wording and image features from textbook visuals. Across 4,742 student-chapter observations from 562 class-student IDs, adding content features improves student-grouped five-fold quiz prediction performance by 9.1% relative to a prior-performance baseline. In leave-chapter-out validation, text features reduce prediction error relative to the baseline, while image-containing models have higher error. This paper suggests that a context-aware model adds useful signal about the text and visual features of questions to better predict student quiz performance compared with using past student performance alone.

Image quality in modern imaging systems emerges from the coupled effects of the sensor, optics, and computational reconstruction. Ultra-thin metalenses offer a path toward substantial miniaturization of optical modules, but practical designs often exhibit pronounced chromatic and field-dependent aberrations that necessitate computational reconstruction. In current metalens pipelines, reconstruction models are commonly trained and selected using distortion-based fidelity objectives, such as PSNR, yet these proxies can be weakly correlated with human preference and downstream utility, reflecting the well-known perception--distortion trade-off. We introduce MetaRanker, a human-in-the-loop active ranking framework that formalizes metalens image quality in terms of semantic interpretability, defined as the degree to which humans can reliably recognize objects and structures in the presence of optical artifacts. MetaRanker combines a probabilistic preference model with uncertainty-aware query selection, and leverages vision--language models to provide lightweight semantic priors. Importantly, these priors are used only to guide the sampling of informative comparisons; human judgments remain the primary supervision signal throughout. Across real-world and synthetic metalens datasets with distinct degradation profiles, MetaRanker produces rankings that align most closely with human assessments, while reducing the number of pairwise annotations required by approximately 80% relative to exhaustive pairwise evaluation. Finally, we show that standard image quality assessment metrics exhibit limited alignment with human interpretability in the metalens domain, positioning MetaRanker as a practical step toward perceptually grounded metalens evaluation and co-design.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly attractive for multimodal quality assessment, but their default reliance on autoregressive text generation and dynamic visual processing is poorly matched to scalar regression under strict latency budgets. We present a bounded-compute adaptation of SmolVLM2-256M-Video-Instruct for product-rating prediction in the LoViF 2026 Efficient VLM challenge. Motivated by recent multimodal engagement-prediction results showing that feature-based regression can outperform token-based score generation, we replace the language-modeling head with a lightweight two-layer MLP fed by pooled decoder states, and we enforce deterministic inputs through fixed 384x384 images and truncated metadata. Across controlled ablations, static global image processing slightly outperforms dynamic tiling, and scaling from 100K to 16M training examples substantially improves validation correlation. Under the official held-out evaluation, our 228M-parameter model achieves 0.39 PLCC and 0.40 CES, providing a strong and reproducible baseline for resource-constrained multimodal regression.

We present IQA-Spider, the first image quality assessment (IQA) framework that unifies reasoning, grounding, and referring into a single LMM-based framework for multi-granularity quality understanding. Existing LMM-based IQA methods typically support only partial perception dimensions, such as quality description and question answering~(\textit{i.e.}, reasoning) or pixel-level grounding. This limitation largely stems from the absence of (i) a unified task and data formulation and (ii) effective optimization paradigms for multi-granularity learning. To address these limitations, we formulate a rigorous four-task paradigm covering global and local quality description, pixel-level grounding, and region-level referring. Based on this formulation, we construct a corresponding IQA dataset with a scalable and automatic annotation pipeline, thereby providing a solid foundation for unified multi-granularity learning. To further enable unified perception, we adopt a conflict-free two-stage design that progressively extends text-level multi-granularity understanding to pixel-level grounding: (i) the first stage equips the model with fine-grained text-level reasoning across multiple IQA tasks, and (ii) the second stage introduces a training-free text-to-point grounding paradigm, which bridges textual semantics and pixel-level perception by mapping token logits to spatial coordinates. Based on these efforts, we achieve IQA-Spider with unified multi-granularity explainable image quality assessment. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate strong performance, validating the effectiveness and versatility of the proposed formulation and framework.

Effective pre-polysomnography screening for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) requires combining clinical risk factors with visible craniofacial and neck cues. Directly prompting general-purpose multimodal foundation models for medical yes/no decisions can yield unstable, poorly calibrated outputs. We propose EviOSAHS, an evidence-grounded multimodal reasoning framework that separates image-only anatomical evidence acquisition from final clinical adjudication. Each frontal facial image is decomposed into seven fixed anatomical queries covering the neck, chin, mouth, face/neck fat, lower jaw, midface, and nose. Visual responses are converted into structured evidence cards recording target anatomy, visibility, risk direction, evidence strength, confidence, and a concise summary. These cards are combined with a cleaned clinical profile only in the final stage, where a large language model performs balanced binary screening adjudication. We evaluated EviOSAHS on a 642-subject cohort, mapping normal subjects to screening-negative and mild, moderate, or severe OSAHS subjects to screening-positive. EviOSAHS achieved 88.47% accuracy, 94.86% sensitivity, 93.74% F1-score, and a 5.14% false-negative rate, outperforming clinical-only prompting, direct multimodal prompting, and naive two-stage pipelines under a unified protocol. Ablations showed that seven-question visual decomposition and balanced final adjudication were critical to the high-sensitivity operating point. A question-level audit of 4,494 visual outputs showed a 100% structured parse rate and 93.88% high-visibility rate. EviOSAHS provides an auditable, high-sensitivity workflow for binary pre-polysomnography OSAHS screening, but should be viewed as a triage assistant rather than a diagnostic system. Prospective validation, external testing, and calibrated operating-point control are needed before clinical deployment.

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown promise for video quality assessment, but most methods still predict an absolute score for each video. Such pointwise supervision often mixes perceptual quality with dataset-specific calibration, including annotation protocols, rating habits, and score distributions. As a result, the learned scoring rule may work well within a benchmark but transfer poorly across unseen domains. We argue that relative comparisons alleviate the absolute-scale calibration bias by focusing purely on perceptual differences rather than dataset-specific rating habits. Consequently, we propose \textbf{VersusQ}, a pairwise margin reasoning framework driven entirely by direct comparisons. Specifically, VersusQ performs LMM-based comparison between two videos, reasons about their visual and temporal quality differences, and predicts a signed continuous margin that captures both the preferred choice and the degree of difference. Furthermore, to align interpretable comparison rationales with fine-grained numerical differences, we introduce Margin-Coupled GRPO, which jointly optimizes rollout-based relational reasoning and continuous margin regression. Extensive experiments on multiple public VQA benchmarks demonstrate that VersusQ achieves state-of-the-art performance, strong cross-domain generalization, and reliable fine-grained ranking under heterogeneous evaluation scenarios.

Mobile app marketplaces require developers to disclose standardized content rating descriptors (CRDs) to inform users about potentially sensitive or restricted content. Ensuring the accuracy and consistency of these disclosures remains challenging due to the multimodal nature of app content, which spans textual descriptions and visual interfaces. In this paper, we present QwenSafe, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) designed to automatically identify the presence of Apple-defined CRDs by jointly reasoning over app metadata and screenshots. To enable scalable training for this task, we introduce metadata2CRD, a data-construction pipeline that synthesizes descriptor-aligned question-answer pairs by combining app descriptions, screenshots, and formal descriptor definitions. We adapt Qwen3-VL-8B using supervised fine-tuning followed by Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to align model predictions with descriptor-specific evidence and explanations across visual and textual modalities. We evaluate QwenSafe on 12 Apple-defined content rating descriptors and compare it against state-of-the-art vision-language models, including Qwen3-VL, LLaVA-1.6, and Gemini-2.5-Flash. QwenSafe consistently outperforms all baselines in binary CRD classification, achieving improvements in positive-class recall of 111.8%, 36.1%, and 2.1%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that descriptor-aware multimodal alignment substantially improves automated content classification and highlights the potential of vision-language models to support scalable and consistent content rating in mobile app marketplaces.

Face Image Quality Assessment (FIQA) is a crucial control step in biometric pipelines. It ensures only reliable samples are processed to maintain system accuracy. State-of-the-art FIQA methods achieve high utility but typically operate as "black boxes." They produce scalar scores without human-interpretable justifications. This lack of transparency limits their effectiveness in human-in-the-loop scenarios, such as automated border control, where actionable feedback is essential. In this paper, we investigate the potential of off-the-shelf Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to bridge this gap by performing FIQA in a zero-shot setting. We present a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing VLM performance. This involves benchmarking traditional FIQA methods through error-versus-reject curves. Additionally, using a diverse set of datasets, ranging from surveillance-oriented to synthetically generated, we analyzed their interpretability, consistency, and robustness to prompt changes. Our results show biometric utility performance depends significantly on architecture, not merely on parameter count. Most VLMs' outputs align with those of traditional methods. We also find that VLM ranking performance and the generated scores may vary across prompts. Our synthetic ablation study shows that while increasing the parameter count can improve internal consistency, it yields worse degradation-detection performance than smaller models. These findings suggest that zero-shot FIQA score estimation using VLMs is promising and could effectively complement conventional FIQA pipelines as an interpretability module. The codes are available at https://github.com/ThEnded32/VLM4FIQA.git.

This paper presents an interpretable closed-loop Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) that supports feedback-guided practice for developing on-camera oral presentation skills at scale. The system operationalizes a seven-dimensional Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) and implements a three-layer interpretable feedback architecture that connects rubric-aligned multimodal scoring, audience-perceived expressive diagnostics, and retrieval-augmented conversational coaching to support deliberate practice. Built on an XGBoost backbone, the ITS maps multimodal inputs (facial, vocal, textual, and oculomotor features) into evidence-based feedback that can be traced back to observable performance cues. Trained on 10,360 Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) video segments, the system achieved rubric-aligned scoring with performance levels comparable to expert ratings (R2 = 0.48-0.61, Spearman's rho = 0.69-0.78, MAE = 0.43-0.57). In a pre-post validation study with 204 adult learners over a 30-day practice window, participants demonstrated significant improvements across all seven BARS dimensions (Cohen's d = 0.39-0.90), with practice frequency showing a strong positive association with posttest performance after controlling for baseline scores and demographics. The results demonstrate how multimodal analytic outputs can be systematically transformed into observable behavioral change through an integrated feedback architecture, advancing explainable and pedagogically grounded ITS design for performance-based competencies.

We audit the multimodal-physics evaluation pipeline end-to-end and document three undetected construction practices that distort how the field measures vision-language reasoning: train-eval contamination, translation drift, and MCQ saturation. (1) Public training pools (UGPhysics-Train, SciInstruct, MMK12) pass single-stage 5-gram-Jaccard audits with zero hits across all six public physics evals; a three-stage audit (Jaccard -> mxbai-embed-large cosine -> Haiku-4.5 LLM-judge) surfaces 134 near-duplicates and 4,846 paraphrase candidates in SciInstruct alone. (2) A 17-pp Sonnet 4.5 delta on 59 paired Estonian-English olympiad problems (30.5% vs. 13.6%; sign test p=0.011, McNemar p=0.021, paired bootstrap 95% CI [+5.1, +28.9] pp). (3) A 46-pp format-and-novelty gradient on identical Sonnet weights between MCQ (79.7% on PhyX) and open-ended olympiad evaluation (33.4% on PhysOlym-A). We release four artifacts addressing these gaps: PhysCorp-A (6,432-record three-stage-audited multimodal corpus), PhysR1Corp (2,268-record closed-form RL pool), PhysOlym-A (500-problem, 99.8% novel-source held-out olympiad eval with native difficulty labels and an EN/ET bilingual subset), and Physics-R1, a reference GSPO+DAPO recipe cold-started from Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking. Across 3 seeds, Physics-R1 lifts the audited corpus over the 8B base by +18.3 pp on PhysOlym-A liberal (8.0 -> 26.3 +/- 1.7; 7.1 pp behind Sonnet 4.5), +15.7 pp on PhysReason (23.9 -> 39.6 +/- 6.4; ahead of Qwen3-VL-32B and Gemini 2.5 Pro), +6.9 pp on OlympiadBench-Physics (46.2 +/- 1.5), and +4.1 pp on PhyX MCQ (77.8 +/- 0.3).

Checkpoint selection for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) presents significant challenges when performance differentials are marginal and evaluation signals are prone to noise. Existing methodologies rely heavily on static benchmarks or pointwise scoring, which frequently misalign with in-the-wild usage and lack robust uncertainty estimation, particularly in OCR-heavy scenarios. In this work, we formulate checkpoint selection as a robust decision problem under evaluation uncertainty. We propose a multi-stage framework that integrates curated real-world data, structured LLM-based judgment, and multi-stage ranking protocols. The evaluation system orchestrates progressive refinement via pointwise filtering, listwise ranking, and pairwise comparison. To enhance reliability, we introduce subsampling-based confidence estimation and a percentile-based scoring formulation that captures distributional characteristics while penalizing tail failures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that data quality, specifically OCR readability, is a critical determinant of evaluation validity.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have facilitated Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output (MSMO), wherein systems generate concise textual summaries accompanied by salient visuals from multimodal sources. However, current MSMO evaluation remains fragmented: text quality, image-text alignment, and visual diversity are typically assessed in isolation using unimodal metrics, making it difficult to capture whether the modalities jointly support a faithful and useful summary. To address this gap, we introduce MM-Eval, a unified evaluation framework that integrates assessments of textual quality, cross-modal alignment, and visual diversity. MM-Eval comprises three components: (1) text quality, measured using OpenFActScore for factual consistency and G-Eval for coherence, fluency, and relevance; (2) image-text relevance, evaluated via an MLLM-as-a-judge approach; and (3) image-set diversity, quantified using Truncated CLIP Entropy. We calibrate MM-Eval through a learned aggregation model trained on the mLLM-EVAL news benchmark, aligning component contributions with human preferences. Our analysis reveals a text-dominant hierarchy in this setting, where factual consistency acts as a critical determinant of perceived overall quality, while visual relevance and diversity provide complementary signals. MM-Eval improves over heuristic aggregation baselines and provides an interpretable, reference-weak framework for comparative evaluation of multimodal summaries.

Multimodal large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as automated evaluators in clinical settings, yet their scoring behavior on ordinal clinical scales remains poorly understood. We benchmark three frontier LLM families against supervised deep learning models for scoring Clock Drawing Test (CDT) images on two public datasets using the Shulman rubric. While fully fine-tuned Vision Transformers achieve the best calibration (MAE 0.52, within-1 accuracy 91%), zero-shot LLMs remain competitive on tolerance-based agreement (GPT-5 MAE 0.67, within-1 accuracy 92%) despite higher absolute error. However, per-score analysis reveals that all three LLM families exhibit a pronounced central tendency effect (systematic endpoint compression): predictions are systematically compressed toward the middle of the scale, with over-prediction at the low end (score 0 to 1) and under-prediction at the high end (score 5 to 4). This effect disproportionately affects the clinically critical extremes where accurate scoring most impacts screening decisions for cognitive impairment. Targeted ablations show that neither few-shot exemplars spanning the full score range nor removing clinical terminology from the prompt eliminates the effect. Our findings extend the LLM-as-a-judge bias literature from NLP evaluation to clinical assessment, and highlight the need for calibration-aware evaluation and post-hoc calibration before deploying LLM-based raters in high-stakes screening workflows.

Long-term multimodal action quality assessment (AQA) evaluates action execution in several-minute audiovisual sequences by mining discriminative quality cues for score prediction. Existing multimodal methods usually model entire sequences with a single temporal encoder and fuse modality features by direct alignment or concatenation, causing key cues to be obscured by global trends, weakened by modal redundancy, and distorted during one-shot score mapping. To address this issue, we reformulate long-term multimodal AQA as a quality cue organization problem and propose MLCR, a multi-level cue refinement framework. MLCR organizes quality evidence at three levels: intra-modal representation, cross-modal interaction, and stage-wise aggregation. Specifically, the intra-modal decoupling encoder (IMDE) preserves modality identity while refining global temporal context and local frequency details. The cross-modal dynamic complementarity-aware retrieval (CMDCR) module retrieves incremental evidence conditioned on the evolving fused state and suppresses redundant responses. The stage-wise multimodal integration (SMI) block progressively accumulates intra-modal and cross-modal cues to refine the fused representation. Experiments on the Rhythmic Gymnastics and Fis-V datasets show that MLCR achieves the best or second-best performance in both Spearman correlation and prediction error, demonstrating its effectiveness and robustness.

Infrared-Visible image fusion (IVIF) aims to integrate thermal information and detailed spatial structures into a single fused image to enhance perception. However, existing evaluation approaches tend to over-optimize both hand-crafted no-reference statistics and full-reference metrics that treat the source images as pseudo ground truths. Recent IVIF reward-modelling efforts learn from human ratings but use scalar regression on aggregated scores, neither leveraging the reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) nor encoding per-image perceptual ambiguity in their supervision, but naively introducing MLLMs with discrete one-hot supervision likewise collapses fused images of similar quality into different rating levels. To address this, we introduce FuScore, which utilizes an MLLM to mimic human visual perception by producing continuous quality score, rather than discrete level predictions, enabling fine-grained discrimination among fused images of similar quality. We exploit the agreement among four IVIF-specific sub-dimensions to construct a per-image soft label whose sharpness reflects how consensual the overall judgment is. We further introduce a tripartite objective combining per-image distributional supervision, within-source-pair Thurstone fidelity for method-level ordering, and cross-source-pair Thurstone fidelity for scene-level ordering across scenes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FuScore achieves state-of-the-art correlation with human visual preferences.

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), trained on web-scale data, risk memorizing and regenerating copyrighted visual content such as characters and logos, creating significant challenges. Machine unlearning offers a path to mitigate these risks by removing specific content post-training, but evaluating its effectiveness, especially in the complex multimodal setting of LVLMs, remains an open problem. Current evaluation methods often lack robustness or fail to capture the nuances of cross-modal concept erasure. To address this critical gap, we introduce the CoVUBench benchmark, the first framework specifically designed for evaluating copyright content unlearning in LVLMs. CoVUBench utilizes procedurally generated, legally safe synthetic data coupled with systematic visual variations spanning compositional changes and diverse domain manifestations to ensure realistic and robust evaluation of unlearning generalization. Our comprehensive multimodal evaluation protocol assesses both forgetting efficacy from the copyright holder perspective and the preservation of general model utility from the deployer viewpoint. By rigorously measuring this crucial trade-off, CoVUBench provides a standardized tool to advance the development of responsible and effective unlearning methods for LVLMs.

Pneumonia remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in low-resource settings where access to imaging, laboratory testing, and specialist care is limited. Clinical assessment relies on heterogeneous evidence, including symptoms, respiratory patterns, spoken descriptions, and chest imaging, making frontline screening inherently multimodal. However, many existing computational approaches remain unimodal and focus primarily on radiographs. In this work, we present MultiSense-Pneumo, a multimodal research prototype for pneumonia-oriented screening and triage support that integrates structured symptom descriptors, cough audio, spoken language, and chest radiographs. The system combines deterministic symptom triage, LightGBM-based acoustic classification, domain-adversarial radiograph analysis using ResNet-18, transformer-based speech recognition, and an interpretable late-fusion operator. Each modality is transformed into a normalized concern signal and aggregated into a unified screening estimate. The fusion weights are hand-specified and are treated as heuristic, interpretable parameters rather than learned or clinically optimized values. MultiSense-Pneumo is implemented with offline execution in mind on standard laptop-class hardware, but it is not presented as a deployment-validated or clinically validated diagnostic system. Experimental results demonstrate strong component-level performance of the radiograph pathway under synthetic domain shifts, while also highlighting important limitations, especially reduced abnormal-class recall for cough acoustics and the absence of paired end-to-end multimodal patient evaluation. MultiSense-Pneumo is therefore intended as a framework and component-level prototype for screening and triage research.

Audio-visual quality assessment (AVQA) is essential for streaming, teleconferencing, and immersive media. In realistic streaming scenarios, distortions are often asymmetric, where one modality may be severely degraded while the other remains clean. Still, most contemporary AVQA metrics treat audio and video as equally reliable, causing confidence-unaware fusion to emphasize unreliable signals. This paper proposes MCM-AVQA, a multimodal confidence-aware AVQA framework that explicitly estimates modality-specific confidence and injects it into a dedicated audio-visual mixer for cross-modal attention. The Audio-Visual Mixer utilizes frame-level, confidence-guided channel attention to gate fusion, modulating feature interaction between modalities so that high-confidence streams dominate while unreliable inputs are suppressed, preserving temporal degradation patterns. A multi-head visual confidence estimator turns frame-level artifact probabilities into temporally smoothed, clip-level visual confidence scores, while an audio confidence module derives confidence from speech-quality cues without requiring a clean reference. Experiments on multiple AVQA benchmarks show that MCM-AVQA, and specifically its confidence-guided Audio-Visual Mixer, improve correlation with human mean opinion scores and yield more interpretable behavior under real-world asymmetric audio-visual distortions.

Multimodal controversy detection (MCD) identifies controversial content in videos and their associated user comments, to support risk management for social video platforms.Prior research frames MCD as a static representation learning task, where features are directly extracted from videos and their accompanying comments. However, these methods fail to capture the diverse perspectives and evaluations from different audience groups. Inspired by the real-world process of content dissemination among audiences, we propose AuDisAgent, a training-free multi-agent framework that reformulates MCD as a dynamic propagation process.Our framework explicitly models audience dissemination through a structured multi-agent system. First, three specialized Screening Agents (Video Agent, Comment Agent, and Interaction Agent) conduct initial assessments from visual, textual, and cross-modal perspectives, respectively. For samples where the three agents cannot reach a consensus, a Viewing Panel Agent is activated to simulate post-screening discussions among audiences with diverse backgrounds and stances. This mechanism models how different audience groups interpret and react to the same content, uncovering latent controversial content that may emerge during the dissemination process. Finally, an Arbitration Agent renders the final judgment based on the complete reasoning chain from the preceding steps.In addition, to address the "cold-start" scenario where newly released videos have few or no comments, we design a Comment Bootstrapping Strategy that leverages historical public comments from semantically similar videos as the initial comment context. Extensive experiments on a public dataset demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in both rich-comment and limited-comment scenarios.

Video platforms such as YouTube have reshaped how users engage with entertainment and information, emphasizing brief, highly engaging content such as Shorts. Within this ecosystem, certain content occupies a gray area where it remains allowed but may still have unintended negative effects on some audiences. To study this problem, we introduce TwistedHumor, a dataset of 1,211 YouTube Shorts paired with 33,041 related comments, with hand annotations for humor presence, humor type, harm, topic, rhetorical devices, and stand up context. Beyond dataset creation, we present a multi view analysis of how humor and harm appear in short form social media. Using LLooM based concept induction over video descriptions, we find that dark humor frequently clusters around themes of critique, coping, awkwardness, and identity expression rather than appearing as a single uniform category. We further analyze audience response through linked comments and show that regular humor is associated with more positive sentiment, while dark humor receives more mixed, neutral, and sometimes more toxic reactions. Finally, we evaluate large language models against human annotations and find that they perform better on stand up comedy compared to shorter jokes. Together, these results position TwistedHumor not only as a new benchmark, but as an empirical study of the gray area between humor and harm in short form video, highlighting the need for context aware moderation and more robust multimodal evaluation.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for multimodal systems, yet their scores provide no indication of reliability. We study this problem through conformal prediction, a distribution-free framework that converts a judge's point score into a calibrated prediction interval using only score-token log-probabilities, with no retraining. We present the first systematic analysis of conformal prediction for VLM-as-a-Judge across 3 judges and 14 visual task categories. Our results show that evaluation uncertainty is strongly task-dependent: intervals cover ~40% of the score range for aesthetics and natural images but expand to ~70% for chart and mathematical reasoning, yielding a quantitative reliability map for multimodal evaluation. We further identify a failure mode not captured by standard evaluation metrics, ranking-scoring decoupling, where judges achieve high ranking correlation while producing wide, uninformative intervals, correctly ordering responses but failing to assign reliable absolute scores. Finally, we show that interval width is driven primarily by task difficulty and annotation quality, i.e., the same judge and method yield 4.5x narrower intervals on a clean, multi-annotator captioning benchmark. Code: https://github.com/divake/VLM-Judge-Uncertainty

Video-to-text summarization remains underexplored in terms of comprehensive evaluation methods. Traditional n-gram overlap-based metrics and recent large language model (LLM)-based approaches depend heavily on human-written reference summaries, limiting their practicality and sensitivity to nuanced semantic aspects. In this paper, we propose QEVA, a reference-free metric evaluating candidate summaries directly against source videos through multimodal question answering. QEVA assesses summaries along three clear dimensions: Coverage, Factuality, and Chronology. We also introduce MLVU(VS)-Eval, a new annotated benchmark derived from the MLVU dataset, comprising 800 summaries generated from 200 videos using state-of-the-art video-language multimodal models. This dataset establishes a transparent and consistent framework for evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that QEVA shows higher correlation with human judgments compared to existing approaches, as measured by Kendall's $τ_b$, $τ_c$, and Spearman's $ρ$. We hope that our benchmark and metric will facilitate meaningful progress in video-to-text summarization research and provide valuable insights for the development of future evaluation methods.

Tactile graphics require careful expert validation before reaching blind and visually impaired (BVI) learners, yet existing datasets provide only coarse holistic quality ratings that offer no actionable repair signal. We present TactileEval, a three-stage pipeline that takes a first step toward automating this process. Drawing on expert free-text comments from the TactileNet dataset, we establish a five-category quality taxonomy; encompassing view angle, part completeness, background clutter, texture separation, and line quality aligned with BANA standards. We subsequently gathered 14,095 structured annotations via Amazon Mechanical Turk, spanning 66 object classes organized into six distinct families. A reproducible ViT-L/14 feature probe trained on this data achieves 85.70% overall test accuracy across 30 different tasks, with consistent difficulty ordering suggesting the taxonomy suggesting the taxonomy captures meaningful perceptual structure. Building on these evaluations, we present a ViT-guided automated editing pipeline that routes classifier scores through family-specific prompt templates to produce targeted corrections via gpt-image-1 image editing. Code, data, and models are available at https://TactileEval.github.io/

Large language models are rapidly evolving into interactive coding agents capable of end-to-end web coding, yet existing benchmarks evaluate only narrow slices of this capability, typically text-conditioned generation with static-correctness metrics, leaving visual fidelity, interaction quality, and codebase-level reasoning largely unmeasured. We introduce WebCompass, a multimodal benchmark that provides unified lifecycle evaluation of web engineering capability. Recognizing that real-world web coding is an iterative cycle of generation, editing, and repair, WebCompass spans three input modalities (text, image, video) and three task types (generation, editing, repair), yielding seven task categories that mirror professional workflows. Through a multi-stage, human-in-the-loop pipeline, we curate instances covering 15 generation domains, 16 editing operation types, and 11 repair defect types, each annotated at Easy/Medium/Hard levels. For evaluation, we adopt a checklist-guided LLM-as-a-Judge protocol for editing and repair, and propose a novel Agent-as-a-Judge paradigm for generation that autonomously executes generated websites in a real browser, explores interactive behaviors via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), and iteratively synthesizes targeted test cases, closely approximating human acceptance testing. We evaluate representative closed-source and open-source models and observe that: (1) closed-source models remain substantially stronger and more balanced; (2) editing and repair exhibit distinct difficulty profiles, with repair preserving interactivity better but remaining execution-challenging; (3) aesthetics is the most persistent bottleneck, especially for open-source models; and (4) framework choice materially affects outcomes, with Vue consistently challenging while React and Vanilla/HTML perform more strongly depending on task type.

The growing ubiquity of Extended Reality (XR) is driving Conversational Recommendation Systems (CRS) toward visually immersive experiences. We formalize this paradigm as Immersive CRS (ICRS), where recommended items are highlighted directly in the user's scene-based visual environment and augmented with in-situ labels. While item recommendation has been widely studied, the problem of how to select and evaluate which information to present as immersive labels remains an open problem. To this end, we introduce a principled categorization of information needs into explicit intent satisfaction and proactive information needs and use these to define novel evaluation metrics for item label selection. We benchmark IR-, LLM-, and VLM-based methods across three datasets and ICRS scenarios: fashion, movie recommendation, and retail shopping. Our evaluation reveals three important limitations of existing methods: (1) they fail to leverage scenario-specific information modalities (e.g., visual cues for fashion, meta-data for retail), (2) they present redundant information that is visually inferable, and (3) they poorly anticipate users' proactive information needs from explicit dialogue alone. In summary, this work provides both a novel evaluation paradigm for in-situ item labeling in ICRS and highlights key challenges for future work.