RAG Evaluation

RAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

28 papers in the last four weeks, up 87% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 224

Jul 2, 2026cs.IR

Evaluating Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Academic Texts

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems use the question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to access information outside their parameters. We evaluate if cluster-based semantic chunking improves retrieval and answer quality compared to fixed-size and recursive chunking evaluating on long, structured academic theses using the Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment (RAGAs) framework. RAGAs based faithfulness shows limited reliability in this setup. Performance on fixed versus document specific questions varied substantially, likely related to the formatting of documents and preprocessing. Under the tested configuration, cluster-based chunking did not outperform simpler strategies.

Valentin J. J. Kreileder, Johannes Reisinger, Andreas Fischer

Computer Science · Deggendorf Institute of Technology · Deggendorf, Germany

Document Chunking Retrieval-Augmented Generation Document QA RAG Evaluation

Jul 1, 2026cs.CL

What Survives Into Context: A Diagnostic for Budget-Constrained Multi-Hop RAG and When Submodular Evidence Packing Improves It

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) under a fixed reader-context budget forces a selection problem: of the evidence retrieved, only a fraction can be shown to the reader. We argue that document recall -- the standard retrieval metric -- is the wrong quantity to optimize in this regime, and we make two contributions. First, as a general contribution, we introduce answer-in-context, a diagnostic that measures whether a gold answer survives as a contiguous span in the packed reader context (not the retrieved set). It predicts answer F1 better than recall (r=0.39-0.55 vs. about 0.31), separates answer quality roughly five-fold (0.60 vs. 0.12 on HotpotQA), and carries information beyond retrieval: it adds Delta R squared=0.17 over recall and shows a 4.6x EM gap even among questions where all gold was retrieved. We also confirm it interventionally: on 2WikiMultiHopQA a packing change that raises coverage but not answer-in-context yields no accuracy gain. Second, as a conditional contribution, we cast reader-context construction as budgeted monotone submodular maximization and build a packer that jointly optimizes relevance, query coverage, representativeness, and diversity. On HotpotQA with a 160-token budget and a 3B reader it beats a strong focused heuristic, MMR, and naive packing -- by up to +5.1 F1 at equal-or-lower token cost, across three seeds. Crucially, we map the scope of this win honestly: it requires the conjunction of (i) multi-hop complementary structure, (ii) retrieval that surfaces the evidence, (iii) a binding but not extreme budget, and (iv) a reader weak enough that evidence density, not reading capacity, is the bottleneck. A quantization-controlled reader-scale ladder (3B to 7B to 14B) shows the edge over the heuristic is absorbed by 7B and significantly reverses by 14B, while the diagnostic explains every boundary with a single variable.

Ananto Nayan Bala

Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology

Multi-Hop QA Long-Context QA RAG Evaluation

Jul 1, 2026cs.CL

Dual-Confidence Contrastive Decoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) increasingly requires models to answer questions from multiple retrieved documents, where only some sources are relevant and the retrieved bundle may contain stale, noisy, or conflicting evidence. Existing contrastive decoding methods primarily focus on resolving conflicts between the model's internal memory and the retrieved context. In contrast, we study the complementary problem of intra-context conflict in multi-document RAG. To evaluate this setting, we introduce DRQA, a factual-conflict question answering benchmark derived from enterprise deep-research scenarios, where answers are grounded in synthetic enterprise-specific facts that are designed not to be recoverable from the model's internal memory. We further propose Dual-Confidence Contrastive Decoding (DCCD), a training-free decoding method that combines document-level confidence, which estimates whether a document appears sufficient for answering the question, with token-level confidence, which estimates whether that document supports a confident next-token prediction. DCCD selects positive and negative document-conditioned streams using these dual-confidence signals and scales a document-level contrast by their confidence margin. Across DRQA and standard multi-document QA benchmarks, DCCD achieves the best average performance among full-context and contrastive decoding baselines, with the largest gains on DRQA. These results highlight the importance of source-aware, confidence-gated decoding when retrieved evidence is internally conflicting.

Raymond Li, Md Tawkat Islam Khondaker, Amirhossein Abaskohi +3

ServiceNow Research · University of British Columbia

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models Document QA RAG Evaluation Contrastive Decoding

Jun 30, 2026cs.IR

One Retrieval to Cover Them All: Co-occurrence-Aware Knowledge Base Reorganization for Session-Level RAG

RAG systems retrieve documents optimized for answering one query at a time. Yet enterprise users arrive with sessions, that is, coherent episodes of related questions that span semantically distant parts of the knowledge base. We show that a single retrieval call over a standard knowledge base covers only 41% of a user's session-level information need. To close this gap, we reorganize the KB offline using co-occurrence-aware clustering and expand retrieval candidates through cluster neighborhoods at query time. On WixQA (6,221 enterprise support articles), our method raises single-query session coverage to 58% (+17% absolute; 95% CI: [14.1, 20.4]), reduces retrieval calls to 70% coverage by 34%, and compresses the KB to 20% of its original size, all consistently across four embedding models and six functional domains. We argue that session-level coverage, not single-query recall, should be the primary metric for enterprise RAG evaluation.

Shivam Ratnakar, Yixuan Zhu, Cecilia Cheng +1

University of Southern California

Retrieval-Augmented Generation RAG Evaluation

Jun 29, 2026cs.CL

MemDelta: Controlled Baselines and Hidden Confounds in Agent Memory Evaluation

Agent memory systems are increasingly evaluated against RAG and full-context baselines, but reported gains often mix changes in the memory method with changes in the language model, embedding model, or retrieval pipeline, making it unclear what is actually being measured. We present MemDelta, a controlled evaluation protocol that varies one component at a time on LongMemEval-S (500 questions, 50+ sessions, three model families). Four findings emerge: (1) verbatim RAG matches full-context GPT-4o-mini (47.2% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.34), but the ranking reverses across models: Gemini gains +14pp from full context, while Sonnet gains +31pp from RAG, partly because it refuses 63% of full-context queries; (2) swapping only the embedding model in an identical pipeline shifts accuracy by +6.2pp at n = 500 (p = 0.004), and Mem0 beats MiniLM-RAG by +11pp but loses to cloud-RAG by 1.2pp, so one variable flips the conclusion; (3) agent self-memory (42%) underperforms basic retrieval (47%); (4) on 2 of 6 question types (n = 88), Mem0 matches cloud RAG (72.7% vs. 73.9%, p = 1.0) at 50x the cost, suggesting narrow rather than general gains. We recommend memory evaluations fix embedding models across comparisons, stratify by model family, and report write-path cost before attributing gains to architecture.

Kuan Wang

Agent Memory LLM Agent Evaluation Memory Agent Benchmarks RAG Evaluation

Jun 28, 2026cs.CL

MAM-AI: An On-Device Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for Nurses and Midwives in Zanzibar

Maternal and newborn mortality remain among the highest in sub-Saharan Africa, where midwifery care is often delivered by nurses who lack midwifery training to international standards, and consulting authoritative guidance at the point of care is hard: the guidelines are long and connectivity is intermittent. We present MAM-AI, a medical question-answering assistant for nurse-midwives in Zanzibar that runs entirely on a commodity Android device: a question is embedded (EmbeddingGemma, 300M) and matched against a curated corpus of 87 guideline documents (63,650 passages), then answered with citations by a 4B int4 generator (Gemma 4 E4B), fully offline, with no query leaving the device. We evaluate the exact deployed configuration with a layered methodology -- retriever, generator under oracle context, end-to-end, and latency -- scored by LLM judges validated against physician rubrics. The evaluation relocates the hard problem. On-device retrieval is essentially solved: the 300M embedder ranks third of seven retrievers and rivals cloud systems, so the passages the system needs are usually found. The small generator is what remains in doubt: adding retrieved context does not improve its answers, and at 4B it cannot be both helpful and safe at once -- of two same-size candidates, the more helpful one commits genuine dangerous errors, so we deploy the other, which is about twice as faithful to its sources (as faithful as a frontier model), and recover its helpfulness with a redesigned prompt that cuts deflection from 33% to 3%. Corpus quality is decisive for the same reason: where the corpus holds the right passage the answer is specific and actionable, and where it does not it goes vague. MAM-AI is a thoroughly evaluated, open-source research prototype, not a fielded product; the system, knowledge base, benchmarks, and evaluation harness are released.

Yi Ren

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Retrieval-Augmented Generation On-Device Language Model Inference Clinical QA RAG Evaluation

Jun 28, 2026cs.CL

mamabench and mamaretrieval: Benchmarks for Evaluating Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Maternal, Neonatal, and Reproductive Health

Medical question-answering benchmarks rarely cover the maternal, neonatal, child, and reproductive-health questions a nurse-midwife asks, and, to our knowledge, no public chunk-level relevance benchmark exists for maternal-health guideline retrieval. We release two benchmarks that fill these gaps. mamabench is a scope-filtered QA set of 25,949 items assembled from seven existing expert-authored sources across multiple-choice, short-answer, and rubric-graded tracks; to help users calibrate the LLM judge that scores the rubric track, we re-scope HealthBench's physician-labelled meta-evaluation to the domain. mamaretrieval pairs 3,185 clinical queries with graded (0-6) relevance labels over a 63,650-chunk maternal-health guideline corpus, using a decomposed rubric that distinguishes a chunk that answers a query from one merely on its topic. Three decisions shape both: assemble and filter expert sources rather than author questions, grade relevance rather than binarise it, and measure and disclose the limits of the labels -- scope-classifier agreement, a frontier-judge check, and a pooling-completeness audit -- rather than treat them as an oracle. A companion paper uses the benchmarks to evaluate a deployed on-device assistant; both are released openly for research.

Yi Ren

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Healthcare Medical QA Biomedical IR RAG Evaluation Evidence Retrieval

Jun 27, 2026cs.CL

5ting at SemEval-2026 Task 8: Strong End-to-End Multi-Turn RAG via LLM-Based Reranking and Faithfulness Control

We introduce 5ting, our system for the SemEval2026 Task 8 (MTRAGEval), which evaluates multi-turn Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Multi turn RAG involves context drift, under specification, and hallucination risk. Our system combines BGE-M3 dense retrieval with FAISS indexing, dual-query merged retrieval, and LLM based reranking, followed by role separated generation constrained to retrieved evidence. The retriever achieved nDCG@5 = 0.4719 in Task A, while the end to end system ranked in Task C with a harmonic score of 0.5597 and RL_F = 0.7692.

Thien-Qua-T-Nguyen, Chi Hoang, Nguyen Tran +3

University of Information Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam · 2Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Multi-Turn Dialogue Evaluation RAG Evaluation

Jun 24, 2026cs.AI

MKG-RAG-Bench: Benchmarking Retrieval in Multimodal Knowledge Graph-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over knowledge graphs has emerged as a promising approach for grounding large language models, yet existing benchmarks largely overlook the challenges of retrieval in multimodal knowledge graph RAG (MKG-RAG). In practice, retrieval is a critical bottleneck: multimodal knowledge is heterogeneous, difficult to align across modalities, and often poorly served by retrievers designed for unstructured corpora. To address this gap, we introduce MKG-RAG-Bench, a cross-domain benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate retrieval in MKG-RAG. MKG-RAG-Bench is constructed from two multimodal knowledge graphs spanning general and medical domains, and includes carefully aligned question-answering datasets that support controlled evaluation of both retrieval and downstream generation. The benchmark is built using an LLM-based curation pipeline that filters low-utility knowledge, generates structurally grounded queries with exact supervision, and systematically covers diverse modality configurations. Through extensive experiments across representative retriever families and modality settings, we show that effective multimodal retrieval remains challenging yet crucial for end-to-end MKG-RAG performance, and that retrieval quality strongly determines generation outcomes. By isolating retrieval as a first-class evaluation target, MKG-RAG-Bench provides a principled foundation for diagnosing current limitations and advancing multimodal knowledge graph RAG systems.

Xiaochen Wang, Bao Hoang, Han Liu +2

The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, USA · Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, USA · Dalian University of Technology Dalian, Liaoning, China +1

Multimodal RAG Retrieval-Augmented Generation Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation RAG Evaluation Multimodal KGs

Jun 24, 2026cs.CL

ProvenAI: Provenance-Native Traces of Evidence in Generated Answers

Retrieval-augmented systems routinely present citations alongside generated answers, yet a citation does not confirm that the corresponding source meaningfully shaped the output. This paper introduces ProvenAI, a framework that decomposes transparency in multi-hop question answering into three independently measurable layers: answer correctness, citation fidelity against benchmark supporting evidence, and per-document influence under leave-one-resource-out intervention. Targeting the HotpotQA distractor benchmark through a seven-stage pipeline covering data normalisation, retrieval indexing, citation-aware answer generation, attribution auditing, ablation-based influence estimation, batch evaluation, and interactive inspection, ProvenAI evaluates 7,405 validation examples drawn from a canonical corpus of 509,300 passages. The system achieves 53.53% answer accuracy alongside a mean citation-fidelity score of 71.55%, and a worked example surfaces what we call the citation-influence gap: a clean citation audit co-occurring with a profile in which one cited source registers only weak influence while seven uncited sources demonstrably shift the output. We formalise the relationship between the implemented surface proxy and a token-level KL-divergence target through a stated faithfulness condition, ground the framework in causal-mediation analysis and database-provenance theory, and discuss how the three measurement layers compose with cryptographic provenance architectures emerging in autonomous scientific discovery. ProvenAI establishes that meaningful transparency in retrieval-grounded QA requires traceable links across retrieved, cited, and behaviourally influential evidence as three distinct, independently measured layers.

Mohammad Faizan, Dalal Alharthi

College of Information Science University of Arizona

Multi-Hop QA Data Provenance Citation Verification RAG Evaluation

Jun 24, 2026cs.CL

Is GraphRAG Needed? From Basic RAG to Graph-/Agentic Solutions with Context Optimization

As advanced RAG variants like GraphRAG and Agentic RAG emerge, one leading question is when and how to use them. Here, we introduce a framework for different RAG scenarios evaluation and comparison on semi-structured knowledge bases, including regular RAG, GraphRAG, Modular RAG and Agentic RAG. We provide implementation for 9 standardized RAG scenarios, and conduct experiments for a comprehensive comparison. These scenarios are designed for real use cases regarding data and domain restrictions, spanning from simple document-based retrieval to advanced features such as hybrid text-graph retrieval, integration with computed or pre-defined domain knowledge graphs, agentic multi-step planning, and agent-graph integration. Besides, we present a novel context engineering method for GraphRAG and Agentic RAG, addressing the context/memory overflow issues, efficiently managing text and graph retrievals with new representations and agentic loop design, leading to 19%-53% reduction on token usage. Moreover, further analysis identifies a retrieval-generation gap where expanded retrieval does not proportionally improve generation quality, suggesting retrieval-oriented metrics overstate advanced retrieval benefits. This work provides data-driven insights on when and how to use them for building production-ready intelligent RAG systems.

Long Chen, Ryan Razkenari, Yuxuan Zhou +5

1Generative AI Innovation Center, Amazon Web Services (AWS) · 2Cisco Systems, Inc.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agentic RAG RAG Evaluation LLM Context Management

Jun 23, 2026cs.AI

To Isolate or to Score? Model-Adaptive Assessment for Cost-Efficient Multi-Agent RAG

Multi-agent document assessment for retrieval-augmented generation is computationally expensive, driving practitioners toward smaller, deployable models whose assessment mechanisms remain poorly understood. We conduct a controlled study of training-free interventions on 7B-9B instruction-tuned models across diverse QA benchmarks, revealing a sharp dichotomy in how models benefit from assessment. For weaker baselines, the dominant mechanism is per-document isolation. Astoundingly, assessment-free isolation matches full multi-agent assessment, demonstrating that resolving multi-document context confusion, rather than scoring quality, drives outsized gains of up to 50 percentage points. Conversely, for strong baselines where scoring quality matters, we introduce Reasoning-Score Coupling, a label-free perturbation probe that classifies scoring behavior. Integrating these findings, we propose MADARA, a model-adaptive routing architecture. Crucially, MADARA's diagnostic thresholds derived from a single pilot model generalize zero-shot to four unseen model families, providing a robust, lightweight pipeline to eliminate computational overhead.

Jungseob Lee, Chanjun Park, Heuiseok Lim

Korea University · Soongsil University

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Adaptive Model Routing RAG Evaluation

Jun 22, 2026cs.CL

Do LLM Attribution Metrics Transfer? Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation Across Datasets and Constructs

Practice often treats automatic metrics for attribution in LLM retrieval-augmented generation as interchangeable. We audit eight automatic scorers -- lexical, embedding, and BERTScore baselines alongside entailment/grounding-trained models (clean and FEVER NLI, the checker MiniCheck) -- across three evaluation constructs (provenance/topicality, generated-answer attribution, and fact-check entailment), asking whether any scorer transfers: stays within the 95% confidence interval of the best audited scorer on every dataset of a multi-dataset construct. In the construct with the most multi-dataset human-labeled coverage -- generated-answer attribution (AttributionBench's four source datasets, n = 1,610, with independent HAGRID, n = 2,150) -- none of the audited automatic scorers does: the per-dataset metric rankings invert (Kendall tau = -0.64, p = 0.031 on AttributedQA vs. LFQA), and an off-the-shelf NLI scorer that is best on short-claim AttributedQA (AUROC 0.90) collapses to AUROC 0.53 (chance) on long-form LFQA, where BERTScore wins (0.91); the reversal persists under the tested truncation settings. This instability has a concrete decision cost: a naive "best-on-average" rule for choosing an evaluator fails leave-one-dataset-out (mean held-out regret 0.172 AUROC, worse than fixing one scorer), so metric choice should be validated on the target dataset rather than assumed from performance elsewhere. A prompt-based LLM judge avoids the chance-level collapses the automatic scorers suffer (no LFQA collapse) but is not uniformly best, ~100x costlier, and non-deterministic -- relocating, not removing, the validation burden.

Tianyu Ding, Aditya Nannapaneni, Juan Pablo De la Cruz Weinstein

Amazon Web Services

Language Model Generation Evaluation LLM Auditing RAG Evaluation Automated Evaluation

Jun 22, 2026cs.CL

When Confidence Takes the Wrong Path: Diagnosing Retrieval-State Lock-In in RAG

The trustworthiness of a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system depends on more than the answer it returns, yet many black-box uncertainty methods still read agreement among sampled answers as confidence. That inference fails when repeated samples condition on the same defective retrieval state. The state may be empty, with the model falling back on parametric memory, or populated by a coherent but wrong neighbourhood. In either case, the answers agree because the error is stable. The problem is recognised in deployed RAG, but it has lacked a name, a measurable signature, and a prevalence bound. We supply all three. We name the failure retrieval-state lock-in and diagnose it by separating the three objects a single confidence score conflates: the answer surface, the retrieved evidence, and the retrieval state itself. In an inspectable, ontology-guided knowledge-graph RAG (KG-RAG) system across six question-answering snapshots, we measure the agreement blind spot directly: at five samples per question, 42% of KG-RAG errors and 59% of dense-retrieval errors carry zero answer dispersion, so agreement has nothing to rank, while evidence- and retrieval-state checks still flag most of them. The decomposition supports an auditable decision rule: accepting an answer only when answer, evidence, and retrieval checks all agree that it is low-risk reaches 91.9% pooled precision against a 69.7% accept-all rate. The cost is coverage: it certifies only 7.7% of answers as low-risk. On the clinical calibration domain it reaches 100% precision under an automated judge; this is an in-domain automated-label upper bound, not a clinical safety claim, and still needs human validation. Confidence in RAG is object-specific: when answers agree, the useful question is which part of the pipeline to distrust.

Sahib Julka

LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich · Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich

Retrieval-Augmented Generation RAG Evaluation

Jun 20, 2026cs.CL

Fixed RAG Compression Collapses Measured Reader Scaling

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) compression papers often evaluate a compressor on one to three readers and treat the compressed evidence layer as evaluation-neutral. We show this assumption is false: fixed compression can raise average accuracy while hiding reader upgrades and reversing model rankings. Across 20 readers and ten domain-method settings over four QA benchmarks and one summarization benchmark, compression gain decreases with reader baseline (nine of ten settings significant, p < 0.05). Generic summarization flips 31% of pairwise model rankings on LongMemEval-S, and a fixed HotpotQA compressor hides 80% of the raw upgrade from Qwen 7B to GPT-4.1-mini. Two opposing forces explain this paradox: compression rescues weak readers by removing noise they cannot filter, and harms strong readers by dropping details they would have used. The pattern appears across structured compilation, generic summarization, three trained compressor families, query-focused summarization, and an external audit of nine published compression papers. We release ragscale, a toolkit built on 177,000 row-level compression transitions, so any compression paper can audit reader scaling with three readers in one day.

Sugam Panthi, Rabab Abdelfattah

The University of Southern Mississippi

Retrieval-Augmented Generation LLM Evaluation Language Model Scaling RAG Evaluation Context Compression

Jun 18, 2026cs.IR

The Token Tax of Epistemic Accuracy: Comparing RAG and Long-Context Architectures for Document-Grounded Generative AI Applications

Document-grounded assistants built on large language models are increasingly used in high-stakes, knowledge-intensive work. Their usefulness, however, may depend on how evidence is allocated before generation. We investigate such a claim by comparing two grounding architectures: (a) retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) that retrieves a few relevant passages, and (b) long-context prompting, which loads the whole document collection in context. We view these as two regimes of "epistemic access" on an accuracy--cost frontier. We use "epistemic accuracy" to capture model correctness that depends on having the right evidence. We posit that broader access (via long context) can increase it, but with a "token tax" (i.e., a substantial increase in cost due to larger input token consumption). We probe this framing with a case study in manufacturing safety training. Using an expert-validated benchmark, we evaluate 972 answers across three machines, two small language models, and three retrieval/in-context prompting approaches. Long-context prompting achieved the highest correctness (73.1% vs. 65.4% for semantic RAG), but at 26 times the per-query token cost. We interpret this gap as the token tax of broader evidentiary access. We carefully discuss the implications of our findings for resource-constrained organizations.

Austin Hamilton, Ryan Singh, Michael Wise +6

Miami University · University at Buffalo

LLM Grounding LLM Inference LLM Prompting Document QA RAG Evaluation

Jun 18, 2026cs.CL

When Does Streaming Tool Use Help? Characterizing Tool-Intent Stabilization in Streaming Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Streaming Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Streaming RAG) hides tool latency by issuing retrieval queries in parallel with the user's still-arriving input, before the utterance is complete. Speculation can only help, though, when the correct query becomes determinable before the user stops speaking or typing -- a property of the query, not the system. We name and measure this property, tool-intent stabilization: the point in the input stream at which a speculative query's retrieval converges on the answer-bearing result. On the CRAG benchmark (1371 validation questions) we (i) characterize how stabilization is distributed across queries; (ii) derive a model-agnostic bound H on the share of tool latency hideable behind the remaining input, given tool latency L and input cadence delta; (iii) validate it against a working streaming pipeline; and (iv) ask which query properties predict early versus late stabilization. Stabilization is typically early: at a realistic operating point a 73.9% streamable fraction of the benchmark admits latency hiding, and H acts as a conservative aggregate floor that realized savings meet or exceed -- though it does not predict savings query by query. Question type yields a statistically significant but small early/late split. The study needs no model training and runs on commodity CPU hardware; a dense-retriever replication confirms the early-stabilization effect is not a BM25 lexical artifact.

Elroy Galbraith

SMG Labs

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Information Retrieval RAG Evaluation

Jun 16, 2026cs.CL

HistoRAG: Embedding Historical Methodology in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Through Critical Technical Practice

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is the prevailing architecture for grounding language model outputs in external evidence, yet its dominant evaluation paradigms and default configurations remain oriented toward factual question-answering. For interpretive disciplines such as historical studies, RAG embeds assumptions that conflict with scholarly practice. We introduce HistoRAG, a framework that translates historiographical principles into concrete architectural interventions. Separated retrieval and generation decouples source discovery from interpretation, temporal windowing enforces balanced source representation across the research period as a methodological requirement of historical inquiry, and LLM-as-judge evaluation makes relevance judgments transparent and contestable. We evaluate these interventions using SPIEGELragged, applied to 102,189 articles from Der Spiegel (1950-1979). Each intervention addresses a measurable deficiency in standard RAG: era-specific vocabulary retrieves zero chunks from the 1950s when using 1970s terminology, evidence of the temporal skew that motivates windowing; vector similarity and LLM-assessed relevance correlate only weakly (Spearman rho = 0.275), motivating post-retrieval evaluation; and keyword-based and semantic retrieval surface largely disjoint source pools, motivating an architecture in which both operate as complementary retrieval layers under a shared LLM evaluation filter. We also introduce the concept of Zwischentexte (intermediate texts that function as interpretive proposals rather than findings) as a framework for responsible integration of LLM-generated text into scholarly practice. The architecture offers a model for how domain-specific epistemological commitments can be translated into RAG design decisions, and may transfer to other interpretive disciplines working with large corpora.

Noah J. Kim-Baumann, Torsten Hiltmann

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Temporal IR RAG Evaluation Hybrid Retrieval

Jun 14, 2026cs.IR

Beyond the Reranker: Do RAG Retrieval Enhancements Help Once a Strong Reranker Is Present?

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is routinely extended with methods meant to improve retrieval: query expansion, hierarchical and cross-document summarization, graph-based expansion, per-query routing, rank fusion, and corrective re-retrieval. The benefits reported for these methods come almost exclusively from homogeneous corpora, predominantly Wikipedia prose. Whether they hold on the mixed-format collections common in practice, where code, markdown, tables, scientific PDFs, and prose are interleaved within one corpus, has not been measured. To study this directly, we build \textbf{HetDocQA}, a heterogeneous benchmark with \emph{chunker-agnostic} span-overlap relevance labels and collection-disjoint splits, and pair it with MuSiQue and QASPER as homogeneous controls. We evaluate eight methods on a shared backbone, with bootstrap confidence intervals and multiple-comparison correction. A strong cross-encoder reranker accounts for most of the pipeline's quality; beyond it, only two methods yield reliable gains: query expansion and SSCC. SSCC, a per-source calibrated corrector introduced here, sets a separate acceptance threshold for each score source and helps only on heterogeneous data. The remaining reranking and pool-expansion methods in common use, among them hierarchical summarization, graph expansion, routing, and rank fusion, give no reliable gain once that reranker is present.

Sadanand Singh, Allam Reddy, Manan Chopra

Cascade Research

Cross-Encoder Reranking Learning to Rank Document QA Information Retrieval RAG Evaluation Query Expansion

Jun 12, 2026cs.AI

FactoryLLM: A Safe and Open-Source AI Playground for Evaluating LLMs in Smart Factories

Fault diagnostics and recovery in smart factories is challenging because critical information is dispersed across manuals of multiple machines which are interconnected through the manufacturing process. Large Language Models (LLMs) can provide a promising approach. In this paper, we propose FactoryLLM, a safe and open-source AI playground designed for evaluating different LLM-based retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models by analysing documents from multiple machines across the manufacturing process. FactoryLLM enables the user to configure the LLM, and assess performance when reasoning over multiple documents, through a dual evaluation setup using both RAGAS and NVIDIA's LLM-as-a-Judge metrics. FactoryLLM is safe because it allows users to run local or open-source LLMs without sharing sensitive industrial data, providing a controlled environment for experimentation. We demonstrate the efficacy of FactoryLLM through a case study which involves an Autonomous Intelligent Vehicle and its Mobile Planner software, evaluating three LLMs across 30 maintenance queries derived from approximately 600 pages of cross-machine documentation. The results suggest that FactoryLLM is effective in cross-machine document reasoning: every model achieved a groundedness score above 0.88. The full code and documentation for community to test FactoryLLM with their manufacturing specific scenarios are publicly available.

Yash Pulse, Yong-Bin Kang, Abhik Banerjee +2

Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia

Manufacturing LLM Evaluation RAG Evaluation

Jun 11, 2026cs.IR

Carolina Guide: A Multi-Agent RAG System with Institutional Guardrails for Academic Policy Assistance

University students often struggle to navigate complex academic policies, leading to advising bottlenecks and delayed access to critical information. Although large language models (LLMs) offer promise for automated assistance, their tendency toward hallucination and inability to enforce institutional constraints make them unsuitable for high-stakes policy guidance without careful architectural design. We present Carolina Guide, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system for academic policy assistance at the University of South Carolina (USC). The system employs a modular multi-agent pipeline with institutional guardrails to provide citation-supported, policy-grounded answers to student queries while refusing unsafe requests such as course recommendations or personalized advising. We evaluate the system on a 90 query test set across 6 departments, achieving 98.9% retrieval success at the >= 2 threshold (genuinely relevant results) with the first relevant chunk at rank-1 for 98.9% of queries (MRR at 10 for rel >= 2 = 0.989). Through systematic baseline comparisons and ablation studies, we show that each architectural component-MMR reranking, adequate retrieval context (k=20), and citation enforcement-contributes measurable practical value despite limited statistical power at 90 queries. The evaluation of the guardrail on 30 adversarial queries demonstrates Safety F1 of 0.89, correctly refusing 86% of unsafe queries while maintaining 93% coverage of benign queries. These results show that production-ready LLM systems for institutional policy guidance require rethinking standard RAG patterns to prioritize safety, transparency, and departmental autonomy over conversational sophistication.

Ben Torsion, Jun Zhou

University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA · University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA

Multi-Agent LLM Systems LLM Guardrails Agentic RAG RAG Evaluation

Jun 11, 2026cs.AI

Rethinking RAG in Long Videos: What to Retrieve and How to Use It?

Retrieval-augmented generation is moving beyond text into long, egocentric video, where systems must select query-relevant chunks across multiple modalities and temporal granularities. Yet progress in VideoRAG is limited by two gaps: existing benchmarks allow queries to be answered without the video, obscuring retrieval errors, and prior methods apply a single modality-granularity configuration per query, ignoring chunk-level variability. We address both by introducing V-RAGBench, a benchmark of

\langle

query, evidence chunk, answer

\rangle

triplets that enables faithful, decoupled evaluation of retrieval and generation, and CARVE, a simple method that runs parallel retrievers across configurations and employs chunk-adaptive reranking to identify the winning configuration for each chunk. Each chunk then enters the generator under its winning configuration selected during retrieval, yielding an interleaved evidence form where the chunk-level decision propagates across both stages. CARVE outperforms eight recent VideoRAG baselines, with the chunks supplied to the generator interleaving multiple configurations rather than sharing a single one, a behavior unattainable by query-level methods.

Yuho Lee, Jisu Shin, Nicole Hee-Yeon Kim +5

KAIST, YH, Seoul, Republic of Korea · Qualcomm AI Research, Qualcomm Korea, YH, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Multimodal RAG Egocentric Video Understanding RAG Evaluation Long-Video QA Video Retrieval

Jun 11, 2026cs.CL

X-MADAM-RAG: Diagnosing and Handling Chinese-English Evidence Conflict in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems may receive evidence that is not merely noisy but mutually contradictory. This issue becomes particularly salient in multilingual settings, where retrieved Chinese and English evidence may support incompatible answer candidates. We study this problem through X-RAMDocs-ZHEN, a controlled Chinese-English benchmark derived from RAMDocs for diagnosing evidence conflict in RAG. The benchmark contains 300 examples across six balanced conditions, including monolingual support, bilingual agreement, reversed conflict directions, and conflict with optional noise. We further examine X-MADAM-RAG, an interpretable pipeline that decomposes evidence handling into per-document candidate extraction, visible-evidence repair, deterministic candidate grouping, and conflict-aware aggregation. On the original controlled benchmark with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, X-MADAM-RAG achieves 0.9667 strict accuracy and 0.9767 conflict-aware success, outperforming an evidence-normalized single-call baseline. However, a zero-call rule-only extractor reaches 1.0000 on the same benchmark, revealing strong template regularity. To probe this limitation, we construct a deterministic naturalized stress test that removes explicit answer templates while preserving candidate strings. On its 100-sample subset, rule-only extraction falls to 0.0000, but X-MADAM-RAG also drops to 0.3000 strict accuracy, below both naive and evidence-normalized baselines. A privileged oracle remains perfect, indicating that document-level extraction is the main bottleneck. These findings position X-RAMDocs-ZHEN and X-MADAM-RAG as diagnostic tools for controlled evidence conflict rather than as evidence of general hallucination detection or robustness to natural retrieval.

Yongqi Kang, Yu Fu, Yong Zhao

Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Retrieval-Augmented Generation LLM Information Extraction RAG Evaluation

Jun 11, 2026cs.CL

SafeLLM: Extraction as a Hallucination-Resistant Alternative to Rewriting in Safety-Critical Settings

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to access organisational documentation, including standard operating procedures (SOPs), HR policies and institutional guidelines. However, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that rely on free-form rewriting can introduce hallucinations and unstable trade-offs between completeness and conciseness, particularly in safety- and compliance-critical settings. Objectives: To evaluate extraction as a hallucination-resistant alternative to rewriting-based RAG and compare strategies that balance precision, recall and safety across document types and model scales. Methods: We compare multiple prompting strategies, including line-number-based source selection, extraction of relevant guideline sentences with explicit safety annotations, and a multi-stage pipeline that refines draft answers using supporting evidence from source guidelines. Experiments are conducted on documents of varying length and structure, including local NHS acute care and oncology guidelines and UK-wide NICE guidelines, using both frontier-scale and locally deployable models. Performance is assessed using automatic metrics and human expert evaluation of relevance and completeness. Results: Line-number selection achieves the strongest results, outperforming direct copying and safety-focused strategies across both large and small models while maintaining high term recall (up to 95%) and close alignment with source text. Safety-oriented approaches improve precision but introduce systematic omissions, while multi-stage filtering further amplifies this trade-off. Performance varies with document structure: line-based extraction excels in protocol-like content, whereas alternative strategies perform better on more verbose documents (up to 97% term recall).

Julia Ive, Felix Jozsa, Evridiki Georgaki +6

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK · National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK · Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, UK +2

Retrieval-Augmented Generation LLM Grounding LLM Hallucination Mitigation RAG Evaluation

Jun 11, 2026cs.CL

How Fine-Grained Should a RAG Benchmark Be? A Hierarchical Framework for Synthetic Question Generation

Evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems requires benchmarks that capture diverse question characteristics, yet practitioners lack empirical guidance on which dimensions to vary and at what granularity. We present HieraRAG, a hierarchical framework for studying granularity in RAG benchmark construction, defining optimal granularity as the level that maximizes discriminative power (the standard deviation of generation quality across categories) within a given RAG configuration. As a case study, we generate 5,872 synthetic question-answer (QA) pairs from FineWeb-10BT across 3 dimensions (Question Complexity, Answer Type, Linguistic Variation) at 3 granularity levels (2, 4, and 8 categories). With a BM25+Falcon-3-10B pipeline, optimal granularity varies by dimension: complexity benefits from fine-grained distinctions (discriminative power: 0.053) while answer type and linguistic variation peak at medium granularity. We introduce a Coherence Ratio metric to quantify whether fine-grained splits cleanly subdivide parent categories, revealing structural differences across dimensions (Question Complexity: 0.40 vs. Answer Type: 1.44). Human evaluation of 110 stratified QA pairs confirms synthetic quality. While these specific findings reflect a single configuration, HieraRAG provides a portable procedure and validation metric for practitioners to determine evaluation granularity within their own RAG settings.

Chase M. Fensore, Kaustubh Dhole, Jason Fan +2

Department of Computer Science Emory University Atlanta, USA

Benchmark Design Synthetic Data Generation Synthetic Benchmark Generation RAG Evaluation

Jun 10, 2026cs.CV

Findings of the MAGMaR 2026 Shared Task

This overview paper presents the results of the shared task for the second workshop on Multimodal Augmented Generation via Multimodal Retrieval (MAGMaR). In this shared task participants submitted systems focused on either (i) video retrieval or (ii) grounded generation of articles given retrieved videos. Teams could submit to either task. For the retrieval task, we had 2 participating teams that submitted a total of 17 systems -- all of which beat a baseline derived from the winner of last year's shared task. On the generation side, we had 4 teams submit 16 systems. All teams had at least one generated report that was labeled the best by a human annotator.

Alexander Martin, Dengjia Zhang, Joel Brogan +7

Johns Hopkins University · OpenAI · University of Maryland, Baltimore County +4

Multimodal RAG Multimodal Grounding Information Retrieval RAG Evaluation Video Retrieval

Jun 9, 2026cs.CL

When More Documents Hurt RAG: Mitigating Vector Search Dilution with Domain-Scoped, Model-Agnostic Retrieval

Retrieval-augmented generation degrades when scaled to large, heterogeneous document collections, where dense similarity loses discriminative power, and top-k retrieval increasingly returns semantically similar but contextually incorrect chunks. We refer to this failure mode as vector search dilution. Even when using hybrid dense+sparse retrieval, we observed this firsthand in a deployed Wyoming Department of Transportation corpus, where scaling from 54 to 1,128 documents (88,907 chunks) reduced accuracy from 75% to below 40%. To address this dilution, we propose MASDR-RAG ( Multi-Agent Scoped Domain Retrieval for RAG) and evaluate it on 200 expert-validated queries across five LLM backbones, six corpora, and two index stacks. Our results indicate that domain scoping using organizational metadata is the key fix, significantly improving P@10 from 0.77 to 0.86 (

p < 0.05

). Furthermore, our investigation of multi-agent orchestration revealed that a high degree of configuration dependence results --creating what we call the precision-faithfulness paradox. Based on these varied outcomes, our practical recommendation is simple: scope first, then perform a single synthesis call, reserving full multi-agent orchestration for genuinely multi-domain corpora paired with native-tool-call backbones. Code and Data will be made public upon acceptance.

Nabaraj Subedi, Ahmed Abdelaty, Shivanand Venkanna Sheshappanavar

Dept. of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA · Dept. of Civil, Architectural Engineering & Construction Management University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agentic RAG Information Retrieval RAG Evaluation RAG Robustness Dense Retrieval

Jun 9, 2026cs.IR

How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to enhance the trustworthiness of Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their outputs in external documents, often using inline citations for verifiability. However, the faithfulness of these citations -- whether the model genuinely uses a source to generate an answer -- remains a critical, unverified assumption. This paper offers the first mechanistic account of how a large language model decides whether to attach an inline citation while answering a factoid question. Using the Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model in a controlled experimental environment based on the PopQA dataset, we employ an activation patching approach. We map the underlying mechanism responsible for citation, discovering that it is not a single, localized component but a distributed, multi-stage "attributional ensemble" of attention heads and MLP layers. We show that amplifying or attenuating only those critical heads and MLPs repairs over 90% of missed citations and eliminates 69% of spurious ones on PopQA without harming answer accuracy. Although gains on the multi-document HotpotQA benchmark are modest, the same component set still moves citation rates in the intended direction, indicating that the underlying mechanism is not dataset-specific. The results reveal a potential disconnect between the model's apparent reasoning and its internal computational pathway, suggesting that inline citations can create a false sense of security.

Ian van Dort, Maria Heuss

University of Amsterdam

Retrieval-Augmented Generation LLM Interpretability RAG Evaluation

Jun 9, 2026cs.CL

Energy-Efficient On-Device RAG on a Mobile NPU: System Design and Benchmark on Snapdragon X Elite

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines are compute-intensive, combining embedding, retrieval, reranking, and large language model (LLM) generation. Running them entirely on-device benefits privacy, latency, and offline use, but the energy cost of CPU inference is a major barrier. We present what is, to our knowledge, the first end-to-end RAG pipeline that runs all neural stages -- embedding, reranking, and LLM generation -- on the Qualcomm Hexagon NPU of the Snapdragon X Elite. Profiling on a Dell XPS 13 laptop, we compare NPU-accelerated RAG against CPU and OpenCL/Adreno GPU baselines on indexing and query workloads. On indexing, the NPU achieves 9.1x higher embedding throughput and 12.3x less system energy. On a 120-query Wikipedia-passage benchmark, it delivers 18.1x faster LLM prefilling, 4.0x lower end-to-end query latency, and 4.0x less system energy than the CPU baseline; the same workload on the integrated GPU is 1.7x slower than CPU and uses 6.5x more energy than the NPU. A GPT-4.1 LLM-as-judge evaluation finds NPU answer quality on par with CPU and GPU within evaluator noise (mean 9.32 vs. 8.95 vs. 9.03 on a 1-10 rubric), with 86.7% of queries scoring identically across all three backends. On the Snapdragon X Elite / Hexagon class of laptop SoC, the NPU thus enables practical, energy-efficient on-device RAG without quality regression -- a sustainable path toward green edge intelligence that we expect to generalize to comparable mobile NPUs (Apple Neural Engine, Intel NPU, MediaTek APU) as their software stacks mature.

Zhiyuan Cheng, Longying Lai

School of Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA · Simon Business School University of Rochester Rochester, NY, USA

Retrieval-Augmented Generation AI Accelerator Inference Energy-Efficient ML LLM Inference Acceleration RAG Evaluation

Jun 8, 2026cs.CL

AbstRAG: Learning to Abstract for Retrieval Problems

Retrieval-augmented generation often fails when the query, the document evidence, and the user's intent are expressed at different levels of abstraction. A query may ask about a class, a relation, or an event, while the document only states specific instances, indirect framings, or scoped formulations. We define this mismatch as an abstraction gap: the minimal set of typed assumptions required to align query intent with the available evidence. To close this gap, we introduce AbstRAG, which treats abstraction as an explicit retrieval object. AbstRAG decomposes the query--evidence gap into expression, conceptual, intent--evidence, and event-type components, and scores relevance by combining match quality, a query-independent utility prior, and the cost of the required bridges. Its central mechanism is reflective refinement: a critic diagnoses retrieval failures, localizes the failed abstraction operator, proposes a minimal stage-specific patch, and accepts the patch only under sufficiency and compression controls. Across three within-document retrieval benchmarks against seven baselines, AbstRAG outperforms on nDCG@10 in 18 of 21 paired-bootstrap contrasts and improves generation accuracy by 1.9%, 5.2%, and 4.0% across the three benchmarks; ablations confirm that reflective refinement drives most of the retrieval gain and the compression control alone reduces over-expansion false positives from 73.7% to 0% on a stress slice.

Lei Xu, Xin Quan, Daniel Pedronette +1

Idiap Research Institute, Switzerland · São Paulo State University, Brazil · Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, United Kingdom +1

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Adaptive Retrieval RAG Evaluation