VLM Robustness
VLM: Vision-Language Model
Overview
Vision-language model robustness asks whether a model’s answers stay grounded and dependable when images or prompts are corrupted, altered, unfamiliar, or in conflict. Researchers test these failures with adversarial attacks, corruption and out-of-distribution benchmarks, prompt and context variations, and measures of grounding, consistency, calibration, and safety. Common defenses include adversarial training, test-time adaptation, visual evidence selection, and interventions on model representations or attention. A central challenge is that clean accuracy and even stable answers can hide reliance on shortcuts, while improving robustness can cost accuracy, utility, or efficiency.
Latest papers
455 papers48 papers in the last four weeks, up 26% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
Persistent Visual Memory: Sustaining Perception for Deep Generation in LVLMs
Intrinsic Gradient Suppression for Label-Noise Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models
Embodied Interpretability: Linking Causal Understanding to Generalization in Vision-Language-Action Models
The Effects of Visual Priming on Cooperative Behavior in Vision-Language Models
Delineating Knowledge Boundaries for Honest Large Vision-Language Models
Beyond Shortcuts: Mitigating Visual Illusions in Frozen VLMs via Qualitative Reasoning
SIEVES: Selective Prediction Generalizes through Visual Evidence Scoring
FCMBench-Video: Benchmarking Document Video Intelligence
One Perturbation, Two Failure Modes: Probing VLM Safety via Embedding-Guided Typographic Perturbations
Majorization-Guided Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models under Modality-Specific Shift
Robust Grounding with MLLMs Against Occlusion and Small Objects via Language-Guided Semantic Cues
From Global to Local: Rethinking CLIP Feature Aggregation for Person Re-Identification
[CLS] token optimized for image-text alignment rather than spatial selectivity, making representations fragile under occlusion and cross-camera variation. We propose SAGA-ReID, which reconstructs identity representations by aligning intermediate patch tokens with anchor vectors parameterized in CLIP's text embedding space -- emphasizing spatially stable evidence while suppressing corrupted or absent regions, without requiring textual descriptions of individual images. Controlled experiments isolate the aggregation mechanism under two qualitatively distinct conditions -- synthetic masking, where identity signal is absent, and realistic human distractors, where an overlapping person introduces semantically confusing signal -- with SAGA's advantage over global pooling growing substantially as occlusion increases across both conditions. Benchmark evaluations confirm consistent gains over CLIP-ReID across standard and occluded settings, with the largest improvements where global pooling is most unreliable: up to +10.6 Rank-1 on occluded benchmarks. SAGA's aggregation outperforms dedicated sequential patch aggregation on a stronger backbone, confirming that structured reconstruction addresses a bottleneck that backbone quality and architectural complexity alone cannot resolve. Code available at https://github.com/ipl-uw/Structured-Anchor-Guided-Aggregation-for-ReID.