AI Agent Architecture

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Latest papers

24 papers6 papers in the last four weeks, against 1 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Oct 10, 2026

A Reference Architecture for Integrating Agentic AI into Enterprise Software: Responsibilities, Interactions, and Variability

Agentic AI moves generative AI applications toward systems that coordinate reasoning, enterprise context, model inference, and external actions. Integrating these capabilities into enterprise software introduces diverse architectural concerns, from orchestration, knowledge and memory, and model access to tools and actions, security, runtime infrastructure, and evaluation. Existing research and industry architectures address many of these concerns but differ in scope, abstraction, responsibility organization, interaction representation, and assumptions about which capabilities are required. This paper presents a technology-neutral reference architecture for enterprise agentic AI integration. We synthesize architectural capabilities from research publications, industry architecture guidance, and interoperability specifications by architectural purpose, organize them into ten responsibilities, and define boundary invariants, typed cross-responsibility interactions, and variation points that distinguish responsibilities from condition-dependent capabilities and replaceable realization mechanisms. We instantiate the architecture as an ESG portfolio-analysis and pre-trade compliance agent over an existing service-oriented ESG metric computation and reporting system, and complement the case with a mapping of an independently published agentic architecture. The case realizes seven of the ten responsibilities; different questions take different interaction paths, controls activate only under their conditions, and the probed boundary invariants hold. The independent architecture maps onto the proposed responsibilities without requiring an additional one. These results provide initial evidence for the architecture's organization and applicability rather than its completeness. The deployment and recorded results are available as a replication package.

Mingqin Yu, Fethi Rabhi, Liming Zhu +1

UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia · School of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Australia · CSIRO, Sydney, Australia +1

AI Agent Architecture Agentic AI Software Architecture Design LLM Agent Orchestration Software Engineering

Oct 4, 2026

Building LLM Agent Systems the Deep Learning Way: From Modular Design to Architecture Search

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized AI research and enabled exciting agent systems. To build a complex LLM agent system, most existing research relies on insights from other domains or heuristics to manually build the agent system. However, this approach often requires heavy hand-engineering and fails to fully optimize for the downstream task of interest. Inspired by the tremendous success of deep learning, we propose to construct LLM agent systems in a modular manner, similar to building a deep neural network. Our key insight is to make analogies between LLM building blocks, such as retrievals, memories, and prompting strategies, and the successful deep learning modules, such as MLPs, attention, and recurrent modules. We further design forward inference and feedback mechanisms for LLMs, where prompts in LLMs are considered as the weights in deep models, and the prompt optimization from feedback is analogous to the back-propagation algorithm. We additionally leverage a search algorithm to search for the best configuration of LLM agent systems, similar to the neural architecture search (NAS) in deep learning research. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed deep learning recipe for LLM agent systems is highly effective, in particular: (1) Organizing LLM modules into deep-learning-style architectures yields noticeable performance gain; (2) Automatic prompt optimization, equivalent to backpropagation, is efficient in incorporating feedback from the task of interest and achieves at least 5% performance improvement; (3) NAS equivalent algorithm works well for further optimizing the LLM agent system architecture with 11% performance gain compared with randomly designed architectures. Overall, our research demonstrates the exciting opportunity of transferring the success of deep learning to building LLM agent systems.

Tao Feng, Pengrui Han, Zhongjie Dai +1

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

LLM Agents AI Agent Architecture LLM Agent Workflow Optimization Prompt Optimization

Oct 4, 2026

Agent Behavior as Code: Efficient and Robust LLM Agents with Programmatic Specifications

AI agents based on foundation models (FMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities to perform complex open-ended tasks. However, they face some common challenges in practice: (a) agent behavior can deviate drastically even for semantically similar tasks, leading to catastrophically propagated errors; (b) high cost and latency due to FM calls, repeated in full whenever a task recurs with different inputs; (c) FMs' limited context and instruction following capability confine how well agents manage the ever-growing execution context and follow complex plans. We introduce

\textbf{A}

gent

\textbf{B}

ehavior as

\textbf{C}

ode

\textbf{Agent}

(ABCAgent), which uses a symbolic program (e.g., Python code with potential neural functions) to fully specify the agent's behavior at runtime, with a powerful FM agent editing that program for flexibility. Behavior is thus specified without premature variable binding, and its execution is deterministic. We evaluate ABCAgent on six agent benchmarks, two of which we construct to test how well a derived program generalizes to variants of the task it was written for. ABCAgent matches a model-matched neural agent on GAIA and augmented GAIA, and surpasses it where robustness and long control flows matter: 98.3% against 97.3% on GSM-Symbolic (

p = 0.001

), 71.9% against 47.4%

\mathrm{Pass}^4

on the telecom domain of

τ^2

-bench (

p = 0.0001

), and more records written correctly at every loop length on our control-flow-augmented WorkArena benchmark. For more parametric task families, ABCAgent is also significantly superior in efficiency. Without authoring a new program, ABCAgent solves 92.6% of GSM-Symbolic instances and 20.1% of augmented GAIA variants, which yields

5.2\times

lower latency and

7.0\times

lower cost on GSM-Symbolic, 19% lower cost on augmented GAIA, and

9.5\times

lower agent latency on

τ^2

-telecom.

Peng Qi, Chunliang Lyu, Gang Li +4

Uniphore · Orby AI

LLM Agents AI Agent Architecture LLM Agent Reliability LLM Agent Workflow Optimization

Sep 30, 2026

Spatial Strategies, Not Actions: Vector-Quantized Geodesics as Tools for LLM-Driven Agents

Large language model (LLM) based agents are often criticized for lacking spatial understanding and mainly exploiting statistical text patterns. We investigate their spatial comprehension through an architecture combining geometrical tools with a LLM serving as a high-level orchestrator in grid-world environments. The agent first collects geodesic trajectories, which are then vector-quantized to extract a representative subset. Offline, the LLM associates a natural language description of the underlying behavioral patterns to each selected trajectory, making it a tool. Online, the LLM chooses the appropriate tool conditioned on the current state and goal. Low-level control is handled by primitive actions that execute the trajectory associated with the tool. From an agentic AI perspective, this approach separates learning into two levels: tool discovery is handled through unsupervised quantization of trajectories, while reasoning and decision-making are handled by the LLM. We test the approach in a partially observable dynamic 2D grid environment with an open vision-language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B). Pairing the geometry-derived tool library with an agent-centered zoom tool and a collision detection tool lets a fast, non-reasoning configuration match the goal-reaching rate of a much more costly chain-of-thought version, while cutting the cost of a decision from minutes to seconds.

Gabriel Turinici

CEREMADE CNRS Université Paris Dauphine - PSL Paris 75116 FRANCE

LLM Agent Skill Learning Tool-Using Agents LLM Agent Planning AI Agent Architecture

Sep 30, 2026

Schema: Discovering Unknown Environments via Agentic Program Induction

Learning to complete tasks in unfamiliar environments with unknown rules remains a key challenge for LLM agents. Current LLM agents often record their discoveries in prose, which may not provide a compact, explicit account of how the environment works. Inspired by how scientists organize observations into testable, predictive theories, we introduce Schema, an agent harness that organizes learning and action through interactive program induction. The LLM agent decides what to investigate and how to act, expressing its evolving understanding of the environment as executable programs. The harness consists of a persistent program workspace and a small set of interfaces for checking these programs against the interaction history, planning within them, and executing plans under step-by-step verification. Schema raises ARC-AGI-3 RHAE from 58.7% to 99.2% with the same base model, solves 100% of the public DiG-bench games, and reaches the median performance of the top-50 human players on MazeBench. Extensive analysis shows the effectiveness of Schema in unknown mechanism discovery, and ablations confirm the contribution of each component.

Guanning Zeng, Jiani Wang, Wenjie Ma +8

Carnegie Mellon University · Impossible Research · UC Berkeley

LLM Agent Harnesses LLM Agent Planning AI Agent Architecture

Sep 22, 2026

Harness as a Language: A Minimalist Agent Framework With Maximal Expressivity

Modern language-model agents are built around the agent loop: the LLM is placed in an environment exposing a set of tools, and the LLM has full control over the workflow by alternating between tool calls and observing their output. However, certain capabilities such as long-term memory and self-improvement currently require specialized systems beyond the agent loop itself. We built an LLM agent framework, JAZ, to explore the extent to which a minimal harness that is little more than the agent loop itself can accomplish tasks these specialized systems are built for. JAZ exposes a single LLM-based primitive invoke and provides a set of built-in hooks that allow the programmer to apply constraints and perform monitoring. Generalizing existing code-mode agent loops, invoke is the simplest loop that satisfies two defining properties: (1) the LLM can write arbitrary executable code that can include recursive invoke; (2) everything visible to the LLM - all inputs to invoke as well as its interaction history with the code environment - are variables in the code environment. We motivate our design from first principles, viewing invoke as a language primitive representing a function whose implementation is provided at runtime by an LLM every time it is called. To validate the design of our core invoke primitive, we evaluate invoke - with only prompting, no manually designed tools, harness, or external systems (e.g., memory or the file system) - on workflows traditionally implemented through specialized harnesses. On long-horizon workflows requiring recall far beyond the context window, JAZ invoke outperforms Letta (MemGPT) by 8% at half its cost on the recall-heavy portion of StuLife. On continual self-improvement, JAZ invoke outperforms ACE by 4% at a lower cost on AppWorld.

Zhening Li, Joshua Liu, Mateja Vukelic +7

MIT CSAIL · Independent Researcher

LLM Agent Memory LLM Agent Self-Improvement LLM Agents Long-Horizon LLM Agents LLM Agent Harnesses AI Agent Architecture

Aug 25, 2026

The Empire, Long Divided, Must Unite: Architectural Convergence in Three LLM Agent Harnesses

An agent harness is what turns a language model into an autonomous agent: the surrounding code that builds the model's context, mediates its tools, runs the loop, and persists state across a long-horizon run. This layer, not the model it wraps, is increasingly the binding constraint on agent behaviour. We present a source-level, multi-case study of three open coding-agent harnesses built from deliberately opposing philosophies: LangChain's deepagents (batteries-included), Earendil's pi (radical minimalism), and DeepSeek's dsh (everything-is-a-plugin). Reading each at a pinned commit and following its commit history, we find that the two mature harnesses have travelled in opposite directions (deepagents subtracting authored scaffolding, pi accreting durable infrastructure), yet converged toward one architectural middle form of five recurring elements: a commoditised loop, an append-only replayable session record, model quirks kept as data, progressive disclosure of context, and explicit extension seams. A third harness, read afterward as a held-out check, exhibits all five, and in one seam reuses another's implementation outright. We therefore do not claim independent invention, and decompose the convergence into parallel discovery, diffusion, and literal reuse. Finally, one load-bearing dimension shows no convergence, and indeed no presence: external verifiability, a tamper-evident record an outside party can check without trusting the runtime. We read this absence not as an oversight but as a predictive gap, the next axis on which harnesses for provenance-sensitive domains will differ.

Dai Jiahong

AI Agent Architecture LLM Agent Harnesses AI Coding Agents

Jul 22, 2026

PRO-LONG: Programmatic Memory Enables Long-Horizon Reasoning

Long-horizon tasks require sustained perception, reasoning, and exploration, and are a persistent challenge for large language model (LLM) agents. This gap is reflected in their limited performance on continual learning benchmarks such as ARC-AGI-3 and NetHack, especially when evaluated without specialized harnesses. Various agent harnesses have been proposed to close the gap, and each commits to a strategy for handling long sequences of observations, i.e., what information to save from the environment and how to load it into model context, a choice we argue is particularly consequential. Existing methods for context management have typically been designed around a tradeoff, where preserving more information makes relevant details harder to retrieve. Recent progress in coding agents, however, makes new approaches to memory viable. We propose PRO-LONG, a minimal context management framework built around programmatic memory for LLM agents in long-horizon, exploratory settings. PRO-LONG addresses the tradeoff by keeping a complete, structured interaction log and using programmatic tools to search this history efficiently. On NetHack, we find increasing gains from using PRO-LONG for cross-episodic memory, with scores reaching up to 2.2x those of a base coding agent. On the full ARC-AGI-3 public game set, PRO-LONG improves over this baseline agent by an average of 18.0 percentage points across frontier models, and matches or exceeds state-of-the-art specialized harnesses (up to 97.4% best@2) while using 4.2-5.8x fewer tokens. Relevant code and logs are available at https://github.com/alexisfox7/PRO-LONG.

Alexis Fox, Junlin Wang, Paul Rosu +1

Duke University

Memory-Augmented Language Model Agents Persistent Memory for Language Models Long-Horizon Agent Tasks LLM Context Management Long-Horizon LLM Reasoning Long-Horizon Reasoning+1

Jun 22, 2026

Critique of Agent Model

What is an agent? What constitutes agency? With the rise of Large Language Model (LLM) systems marketed as coding agents'', AI co-scientists'', and other agentic" tools that promise to drive up productivity, and at the same time, existential" concerns such as AI escaping human control with destructive power under a speculative

machine agency" against humans, it has become essential to clarify where automation ends and agency begins, both for building capable systems and for understanding whether and what to fear. Drawing on Descartes' grounding of agency in independent thought, and on portrayals of autonomous beings in science fiction, we survey the current landscape of AI agents, and analyze agent architectures along five dimensions: goal, identity, decision-making, self-regulation, and learning. Specifically, we argue that genuine agency requires these structures to be *internalized within the system itself* rather than assembled through external scaffolding. This distinction between *agentic* systems, whose competence resides in engineered workflows, and *agentive* systems, whose capabilities (including social interaction) arise endogenously, defines the boundary between systems designed for prescribed tasks, and those capable of operating in the open world with true autonomy. Building on this analysis, we propose the Goal-Identity-Configurator (GIC) architecture for a general-purpose agent model, combining hierarchical goal decomposition, identity evolution, simulative reasoning grounded in a separately trained world model, learned self-regulation, and self-directed learning from both real and simulated experience. Furthermore, we share insight on the auditability, controllability, and safety of agentive systems that possess greater autonomy and

agency", but remain under human oversight.

Eric Xing, Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou

Institute of Foundation Models, Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence · School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University

AI Agent Safety AI Agent Architecture Agentic AI

Jun 11, 2026

Recursive Agent Harnesses

Recursive language models (RLMs) showed that recursion over model calls is an effective strategy for long-context reasoning, and production coding agents have begun to write code that spawns subagents at scale, most recently in Anthropic's dynamic workflows. We name and study the pattern between these two lines of work, where the recursive unit is a full agent harness with filesystem tools, code execution, and planning rather than a model call with no tools. We call this the Recursive Agent Harness (RAH) and frame it as harness recursion, the code-first extension to the model recursion of RLMs. A parent agent generates and runs an executable script that spawns subagent harnesses in parallel for fine-grained workloads and uses structured function calls for small subtasks. We provide a controlled evaluation on long-context reasoning. With the backbone held fixed at GPT-5 to match the published Codex and RLM baselines, RAH improves the Codex coding-agent baseline from 71.75% to 81.36% on Oolong-Synthetic (199 samples, 13 context-length buckets up to 4M tokens), a gain attributable to the harness rather than the model. With a stronger backbone, Claude Sonnet 4.5, the same design reaches 89.77%.

Elias Lumer, Sahil Sen, Kevin Paul +1

PricewaterhouseCoopers, U.S.

Tool-Augmented Language Model Agents LLM Agent Orchestration Long-Context Inference Multi-Agent Coding LLM Agent Harnesses AI Agent Architecture

May 26, 2026

The MiniMax-M2 Series: Mini Activations Unleashing Max Real-World Intelligence

We introduce the MiniMax-M2 series, a family of Mixture-of-Experts language models built around the principle that mini activations can unleash maximum real-world intelligence. The flagship M2 contains 229.9B total parameters with only 9.8B activated per token. Designed end-to-end for agentic deployment, the M2 series rests on three components: (i) agent-driven data pipelines producing large-scale, verifiable trajectories across agentic coding and agentic cowork, each grounded in an executable workspace and an artifact-aligned reward; (ii) Forge, a scalable agent-native RL system that adapts to long-horizon agent trajectories, paired with windowed-FIFO scheduling, prefix-tree merging, inference optimization, and a clean training-inference-agent decoupling that supports both white-box and black-box agents; (iii) the latest M2.7 checkpoint takes an early step toward self-evolution -- autonomously debugging training runs and modifying its own scaffold. Across M2 through M2.7, this combination translates a mini-activation footprint into frontier-tier performance on agentic coding, deep search, office-task, and reasoning benchmarks.

MiniMax, :, Aili Chen +204

Mixture-of-Experts Language Models Agentic RL AI Coding Agents LLM Agent Training Long-Horizon LLM Agents AI Agent Architecture

May 18, 2026

Beyond Scaling: Agents Are Heading to the Edge

The bottleneck of useful agentic intelligence has shifted from compressing world knowledge into a single model to executing a coordinated system. This position paper argues that personal-agent architecture must move to the edge because the core properties of agentic intelligence tasks, particularly their structural coupling with high-fidelity local context and the need for zero-latency execution loops, do not sit well with cloud-centric designs. We develop this claim through three structural shifts. First, the Prefrontal Turn: the main marginal lever of capability has moved from pre-training scale to framework-level executive control. Such control must remain physically close to the environment of action if the agent is to preserve cognitive alignment. Second, the Data-Geography Paradox, the ``dark matter'' of agentic data (local file hierarchies, real-time sensor streams, and transient OS states) degrades, disappears, or loses meaning once prepared for cloud transmission, thereby cutting the agent off from ground-truth context. Third, the interaction-alignment loop, the only economically and ecologically sustainable source of agentic refinement data is the high-fidelity implicit preference signal produced through real-time local interaction. Third, the interaction-alignment loop, the only economically and ecologically sustainable source of agentic refinement data is the high-fidelity implicit preference signal produced through real-time local interaction. We conclude with falsifiable predictions for the next deployment cycle of personal agents.

Chunlin Tian, Dongqi Cai, Wanru Zhao +1

University of Cambridge · Nanjing University · University of Macau

Edge Computing AI Agent Architecture Personal AI Agents

May 15, 2026

Agentic Discovery of Neural Architectures: AIRA-Compose and AIRA-Design

Toward recursive self-improvement, we investigate LLM agents autonomously designing foundation models beyond standard Transformers. We introduce a dual-framework approach: AIRA-Compose for high-level architecture search, and AIRA-Design for low-level mechanistic implementation. AIRA-Compose uses 11 agents to explore fundamental computational primitives under a 24-hour budget. Agents evaluate million-parameter candidates, extrapolating top designs to 350M, 1B, and 3B scales. This yields 14 architectures across two families: AIRAformers (Transformer-based) and AIRAhybrids (Transformer-Mamba). Pre-trained at 1B scale, these consistently outperform Llama 3.2 and Composer-found baselines. On downstream tasks, AIRAformer-D and AIRAhybrid-D improve accuracy by 2.4% and 3.8% over Llama 3.2. Furthermore, AIRA-Compose finds models with highly efficient scaling frontiers: AIRAformer-C scales 54% and 71% faster than Llama 3.2 and Composer's best Transformer, while AIRAhybrid-C outscales Nemotron-2 by 23% and Composer's best hybrid by 37%. AIRA-Design tasks 20 agents with writing novel attention mechanisms for long-range dependencies and high-performing training scripts. On the Long Range Arena benchmark, agent-designed architectures reach within 2.3% and 2.6% of human state-of-the-art on document matching and text classification. On the Autoresearch benchmark, Greedy Opus 4.5 achieves 0.968 validation bits-per-byte under a fixed time budget, surpassing the published minimum. Together, these frameworks show AI agents can autonomously discover architectures and algorithmic optimizations matching or surpassing hand-designed baselines. This establishes a powerful paradigm for discovering next-generation foundation models, marking a clear step toward recursive self-improvement.

Alberto Pepe, Chien-Yu Lin, Despoina Magka +6

FAIR at Meta

Large Language Model-Guided NAS Large Language Model-Guided Optimization Neural Architecture Search AI Agent Architecture

May 12, 2026

Autonomy and Agency in Agentic AI: Architectural Tactics for Regulated Contexts

Deploying agentic AI in regulated contexts requires principled reasoning about two design dimensions: agency (what the system can do) and autonomy (how much it acts without human involvement). Though often treated independently, they are coupled: at higher autonomy, human error correction is less available, so reliable operation requires constraining agency accordingly; compliance requirements reinforce this by mandating human involvement as action consequences grow. Yet no established approach addresses them jointly, leaving practitioners without a principled basis for reasoning about oversight, action consequences, and error correction. This work introduces a two-dimensional design space in which both dimensions are organised into five operational levels, making the coupling explicit and navigable. Autonomy ranges from human-commanded operation (L1) to fully autonomous monitoring (L5); agency ranges from reasoning over supplied context (L1) to committed writes to authoritative records (L5). Building on this space, we propose six architectural tactics--checkpoints, escalation, multi-agent delegation, tool provisioning, tool fencing, and write staging--for adjusting a deployment's position within it. The tactics are grounded in two worked examples from public-sector contexts, illustrating how they apply under realistic compliance constraints. We further examine five deployment parameters--model capability, agent architecture, tool fidelity, workflow bottlenecks, and evaluation--that shape what is achievable at any configuration independently of agency and autonomy. Together, the design space, tactics, and deployment parameters provide a shared vocabulary for principled, compliance-aware agentic AI design in which responsibility, auditability, and reversibility are explicit design considerations rather than properties that must be retrofitted after deployment.

Damir Safin, Dian Balta

fortiss GmbH, Research Institute of the Free State of Bavaria for software-intensive systems, Munich, Germany

AI Agent Architecture AI Agent Governance Human Oversight of AI Agentic AI AI Regulatory Compliance

May 7, 2026

Designing Intelligent Enterprise Agents: A Capability-Aligned Multi-Agent Architecture

Enterprise interest in multi-agent systems has shifted from generic software agents to large-language-model (LLM) based intelligent agents that plan, use tools, maintain contextual memory, inspect intermediate results, collaborate with other agents, and sometimes act in systems of record. This paper revises the enterprise architecture thesis around a design-first claim: governance is necessary, but it cannot be the primary organizing abstraction. The primary abstraction must be agent design - capability boundaries, autonomy allocation, interaction protocols, tool and data authority, state and memory design, verification design, and human interaction design. We propose CEAD (Capability-Aligned Enterprise Agent Design), a reference architecture for intelligent agents that uses service-oriented architecture (SOA) as an exemplar for contracts, registries, loose coupling, and policy-aware integration, while explicitly rejecting the idea that services are agents. It treats microservices as a cautionary precedent: decomposition without design discipline produces distributed complexity, cost, operational fragility, and agent proliferation. We evaluate CEAD over 10,000 enterprise tasks, comparing five architectures: a prompt-first mono-agent, a role-based micro-agent swarm, SOA-brokered agents, a governance-first but design-poor agent grid, and the proposed CEAD architecture. CEAD achieves 70.6% safe success, versus 45.2% for the mono-agent baseline, 23.1% for the ungoverned micro-agent swarm, 58.8% for SOA-brokered agents, and 50.8% for the control-heavy, design-poor grid. The results support the conclusion that design quality is the first-order enterprise concern; governance, security, policy, audit, and assurance should support and enforce good design rather than substitute for it.

John deVadoss

InterWork Alliance Washington DC

Enterprise AI Agents AI Agent Architecture LLM Agents Multi-Agent Systems LLM Agent Safety Software Architecture Design

Apr 20, 2026

Architectural Design Decisions in AI Agent Harnesses

AI agent systems increasingly rely on reusable non-LLM engineering infrastructure that packages tool mediation, context handling, delegation, safety control, and orchestration. Yet the architectural design decisions in this surrounding infrastructure remain understudied. This paper presents a protocol-guided, source-grounded empirical study of 70 publicly available agent-system projects, addressing three questions: which design-decision dimensions recur across projects, which co-occurrences structure those decisions, and which typical architectural patterns emerge. Methodologically, we contribute a transparent investigation procedure for analyzing heterogeneous agent-system corpora through source-code and technical-material reading. Empirically, we identify five recurring design dimensions (subagent architecture, context management, tool systems, safety mechanisms, and orchestration) and find that the corpus favors file-persistent, hybrid, and hierarchical context strategies; registry-oriented tool systems remain dominant while MCP- and plugin-oriented extensions are emerging; and intermediate isolation is common but high-assurance audit is rare. Cross-project co-occurrence analysis reveals that deeper coordination pairs with more explicit context services, stronger execution environments with more structured governance, and formalized tool-registration boundaries with broader ecosystem ambitions. We synthesize five recurring architectural patterns spanning lightweight tools, balanced CLI frameworks, multi-agent orchestrators, enterprise systems, and scenario-verticalized projects. The result provides an evidence-based account of architectural regularities in agent-system engineering, with grounded guidance for framework designers, selectors, and researchers.

Hu Wei

LLM Agent Orchestration Tool-Using Agents AI Agent Architecture Software Architecture Design

Apr 14, 2026

Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today's and Future AI Agent Systems

Claude Code is an agentic coding tool that can run shell commands, edit files, and call external services on behalf of the user. This study describes its architecture by analyzing the publicly available source code and comparing it with two independent open-source AI agent systems, OpenClaw and Hermes Agent, that answer many of similar or even the same design questions. Our analysis identifies five human values, philosophies, and needs that motivate the architecture: human decision authority, safety, security, and privacy, reliable execution, capability amplification, and contextual adaptability. We then trace them through thirteen design principles to implementation choices. The core of the system is a simple while-loop that calls the model, runs tools, and repeats. Most of the code, however, lives in the systems around this loop: a permission system with seven modes and an ML-based classifier, a five-layer compaction pipeline for context management, four extensibility mechanisms (MCP, plugins, skills, and hooks), a subagent delegation and orchestration mechanism, and append-oriented session storage. Comparisons with OpenClaw and Hermes Agent show that the same design questions produce different answers across three deployment contexts. Claude Code emphasizes per-action safety, OpenClaw emphasizes perimeter-level access, and Hermes renders per-action approvals across many surfaces. At the runtime layer, Claude Code uses a single CLI loop, OpenClaw embeds the runtime within a gateway control plane, and Hermes uses one process whose role is set by its entry point. At the context and extension layer, Claude Code extends the context window, OpenClaw registers gateway-wide capabilities, and Hermes provides pluggable memory and model backends. We finally identify six open design directions for future agent systems, grounded in recent empirical, architectural, and policy literature.

Jiacheng Liu, Xiaohan Zhao, Xinyi Shang +1

VILA Lab, Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence · University College London

AI Coding Agents LLM Agent Orchestration LLM Agent Security AI Agent Architecture LLM Agent Safety

Apr 5, 2026

Architecture Without Architects: How AI Coding Agents Shape Software Architecture

AI coding agents select frameworks, scaffold infrastructure, and wire integrations, often in seconds. These are architectural decisions, yet almost no one reviews them as such. We identify five mechanisms by which agents make implicit architectural choices and propose six prompt-architecture coupling patterns that map natural-language prompt features to the infrastructure they require. The patterns range from contingent couplings (structured output validation) that may weaken as models improve to fundamental ones (tool-call orchestration) that persist regardless of model capability. An illustrative demonstration confirms that prompt wording alone produces structurally different systems for the same task. We term the phenomenon vibe architecting, architecture shaped by prompts rather than deliberate design, and outline review practices, decision records, and tooling to bring these hidden decisions under governance.

Phongsakon Mark Konrad, Tim Lukas Adam, Riccardo Terrenzi +1

Centre for Industrial Software, University of Southern Denmark, Alsion 2, Sønderborg, 6400, Denmark

Software Architecture Design AI Coding Agents Software Engineering AI Agent Architecture AI Agent Governance Prompt Engineering

Mar 31, 2026

Making Sense of AI Agents Hype: Adoption, Architectures, and Takeaways from Practitioners

To support practitioners in understanding how agentic systems are designed in real-world industrial practice, we present a review of practitioner conference talks on AI agents. We analyzed 138 recorded talks to examine how companies adopt agent-based architectures (Objective 1), identify recurring architectural strategies and patterns (Objective 2), and analyze application domains and technologies used to implement and operate LLM-driven agentic systems (Objective 3).

Ruoyu Su, Matteo Esposito, Roberta Capuano +4

University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland · University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy · Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands +1

AI Agent Architecture LLM Agents Agentic AI

Mar 27, 2026

AIRA_2: Overcoming Bottlenecks in AI Research Agents

Existing research has identified three structural performance bottlenecks in AI research agents: (1) synchronous single-GPU execution constrains sample throughput, limiting the benefit of search; (2) a generalization gap where validation-based selection causes overfitting and performance to degrade over extended search horizons; and (3) the limited capability of fixed, single-turn LLM operators imposes a ceiling on search performance. We introduce AIRA

_2

, which addresses these bottlenecks through three architectural choices: an asynchronous multi-GPU worker pool that increases experiment throughput linearly; a Hidden Consistent Evaluation protocol that delivers a reliable evaluation signal; and ReAct agents that dynamically scope their actions and debug interactively. On MLE-bench-30, AIRA

^{\dagger}_{2}

achieves a mean Percentile Rank of 81.5% at 24 hours and 83.1% at 72 hours, outperforming the strongest baseline, which achieves 72.7%. On AIRS-Bench, AIRA

_2

exceeds human state-of-the-art on 6 out of 20 diverse research tasks. Ablations confirm that each architectural component is necessary, that performance follows a predictable scaling law that transfers across LLM backbones, and that the "overfitting" reported in prior work was driven by evaluation noise rather than true data memorization.

Karen Hambardzumyan, Nicolas Baldwin, Edan Toledo +22

FAIR at Meta · University College London · University of Oxford

Autonomous Research Agents AI Agent Architecture AI Agents for Scientific Discovery AI Agent Evaluation AI Agent Benchmarks

Mar 16, 2026

A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology

Existing frameworks for LLM-based agent architectures describe systems from a single perspective: industry guides (Anthropic, Google, LangChain) focus on execution topology -- how data flows -- while cognitive science surveys focus on cognitive function -- what the agent does. Neither axis alone disambiguates architecturally distinct systems: the same Orchestrator-Workers topology can implement Plan-and-Execute, Hierarchical Delegation, or Adversarial Verification -- three patterns with fundamentally different failure modes and design trade-offs. We propose a two-dimensional classification that combines (1) a Cognitive Function axis with seven categories (Perception, Memory, Reasoning, Action, Reflection, Collaboration, Governance) and (2) an Execution Topology axis with six structural archetypes (Chain, Route, Parallel, Orchestrate, Loop, Hierarchy). The resulting 7x6 matrix identifies 28 named patterns, 15 with original names. We demonstrate orthogonality through systematic cross-axis analysis, define eight representative patterns in detail, and validate descriptive coverage across four real-world domains (financial lending, legal due diligence, network operations, healthcare triage). Cross-domain analysis yields five empirical laws of pattern selection governing the relationship between environmental constraints (time pressure, action authority, failure cost asymmetry, volume) and architectural choices. The framework provides a principled, framework-neutral, and model-agnostic vocabulary for AI agent architecture design.

Jia Huang, Joey Tianyi Zhou

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore · Centre for Frontier AI Research (CFAR), A*STAR

AI Agent Architecture LLM Agent Orchestration Cognitive Architectures for AI Agents

Mar 13, 2026

Orla: A Library for Serving LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

We introduce Orla, a library for constructing and running LLM-based agentic systems. Modern agentic applications consist of workflows that combine multiple LLM inference steps, tool calls, and heterogeneous infrastructure. Today, developers typically build these systems by manually composing orchestration code with LLM serving engines and tool execution logic. Orla provides a general abstraction that separates request execution from workflow-level policy. It acts as a serving layer above existing LLM inference engines: developers define workflows composed of stages, while Orla manages how those stages are mapped, executed, and coordinated across models and backends. It provides agent-level control through three mechanisms: a stage mapper, which assigns each stage to an appropriate model and backend; a workflow orchestrator, which schedules stages and manages their resources and context; and a memory manager, which manages inference state such as the KV cache across workflow boundaries. We demonstrate Orla with a customer support workflow that exercises many of its capabilities. We evaluate Orla on two datasets, showing that stage mapping improves latency and cost compared to a single-model vLLM baseline, while workflow-level cache management reduces time-to-first-token.

Rana Shahout, Hayder Tirmazi, Minlan Yu +1

Harvard University MA, USA · Boston University MA, USA

LLM Agent Orchestration LLM Agent Serving LLM Inference Serving AI Agent Architecture Multi-Agent LLM Systems LLM Agent Workflow Optimization

Feb 26, 2026

General Agent Evaluation

General-purpose agents perform tasks in unfamiliar environments without domain-specific manual customization. Yet no study has systematically measured how agent architecture shapes performance across heterogeneous protocols and diverse unfamiliar environments. This is the first systematic study, comparing tool-calling, MCP, code-generation, and CLI agents on the same benchmarks with the same models. Two gaps blocked such a study: existing harnesses require per-benchmark wiring or fixed protocol classes (web for BrowserGym, CLI for Harbor), and benchmarks themselves expect human-authored prompts, context, and integration glue. To enable this study, we contribute (1) a unifying protocol that bridges existing benchmark and agent protocols; (2) an evaluation harness that surfaces any benchmark to any general-purpose agent and backbone model; and (3) the first Open General Agent Leaderboard of agent configurations, a full factorial over 5 agent architectures x 5 backbone LLMs (three closed-source, two open-weight) x 6 benchmarks spanning software engineering, customer service, deep research, and personal assistance. We find that (i) general agents adapt to every tested domain without per-domain customization; (ii) agent architecture choice swings results by up to 12pp within a single model, yet backbone model choice dominates overall performance; (iii) on 4 of 6 tested benchmarks, top general agents are indistinguishable from the leading heavily-customized domain-specific agents; (iv) open-weight models tested exhibit "generality sinks" absent from frontier closed-source models: they consistently collapse on specific agent architectures or benchmarks; (v) a behavioral failure analysis reveals architecture-distinctive error signatures that aggregate scoring cannot discriminate. Code, harness, leaderboard, and traces are at https://www.exgentic.ai.

Elron Bandel, Asaf Yehudai, Lilach Eden +12

IBM Research · MIT

Agent Evaluation Automated Agent Evaluation LLM Agents Computer-Use Agent Evaluation AI Agent Architecture AI Agent Benchmarks+1

Feb 18, 2026

TabAgent: A Framework for Replacing Agentic Generative Components with Tabular-Textual Classifiers

Agentic systems, AI architectures that autonomously execute multi-step workflows to achieve complex goals, are often built using repeated large language model (LLM) calls for closed-set decision tasks such as routing, shortlisting, gating, and verification. While convenient, this design makes deployments slow and expensive due to cumulative latency and token usage. We propose TabAgent, a framework for replacing generative decision components in closed-set selection tasks with a compact textual-tabular classifier trained on execution traces. TabAgent (i) extracts structured schema, state, and dependency features from trajectories (TabSchema), (ii) augments coverage with schema-aligned synthetic supervision (TabSynth), and (iii) scores candidates with a lightweight classifier (TabHead). On the long-horizon AppWorld benchmark, TabAgent maintains task-level success while eliminating shortlist-time LLM calls, reducing latency by approximately 95% and inference cost by 85-91%. Beyond tool shortlisting, TabAgent generalizes to other agentic decision heads, establishing a paradigm for learned discriminative replacements of generative bottlenecks in production agent architectures.

Ido Levy, Eilam Shapira, Yinon Goldshtein +3

IBM Research, Haifa, Israel.

LLM Agent Workflow Optimization AI Agent Architecture LLM Decision-Making Classification