Choice

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

11 papers in the last four weeks, up 175% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Jul 6Week of Sep 21

Latest papers 45

Oct 1, 2026cs.CL

Scalable, Transferable Meta-network for Data Selection Requires a Different Loss (and Why the Obvious Choice is Problematic)

Data selection is critical for training large language models on massive and heterogeneous corpora. Meta-learning for Training-data Selection offers a principled alternative to heuristic scoring by learning data weights from a target validation objective, but existing methods face a trade-off between fine-grained valuation and transferability to unseen data. A natural solution is to replace per-sample weights with a selection network. However, we find that directly incorporating such a network into existing MTS objectives leads to unstable optimization and poor generalization, caused by weight suppression and persistent reliance on easy-to-learn features. To address these issues, we propose Transferable Example Scoring and Selection (TESS), a scalable data-selection framework built on a Pointwise Value Matching objective (PVM). Experiments on LLM safety and targeted instruction tuning demonstrate strong transfer across datasets, from subsets to full corpora, and from smaller to larger models.

Zilin Du, Bowen Yang, Boyang Albert Li

College of Computing and Data Science Nanyang Technological University Singapore

Natural Language Datasets Training Data Choice Multivariate Time-Series

Sep 29, 2026cs.CL

Shifting Mechanisms: How Positional Encoding Choice Shapes In-Context Retrieval

Language models increasingly use architectures that vary attention span and positional encoding across layers, such as applying RoPE with sliding-window attention and NoPE with global attention (SWA NoPE). However, how these choices shape in-context retrieval remains unclear. To study this question, we take a mechanistic view, tracing how positional encoding (PE) choice shapes the internal mechanisms models use for in-context retrieval. Across 22 open-weight models spanning eight families, we find that standard RoPE models rely primarily on positional retrieval, while PE hybrids shift toward semantic retrieval. We further show on a controlled pre-training ablation that confining positional encoding to local layers produces this semantic shift, degrading representations of positional information. Finally, we show that the reported long-context gains of PE hybrids mask a retrieval trade-off: SWA NoPE improves over RoPE on multiple-target retrieval and QA, but degrades when distinguishing competing keys. We show that these behavioral differences better track the mechanism shift from positional toward semantic mechanisms than a uniform improvement in long-context retrieval.

Eric Enouen, Sainyam Galhotra

Cornell University

Positional Encoding Efficient Long-Context Inference Linear Attention Choice

Sep 29, 2026cs.GT

Social Choice Foundations for Simulation-Augmented Generation

Simulation-augmented generation (SAGE) is a recent technical proposal in which models simulate individuals' viewpoints at inference time in order to provide more representative answers to contentious user queries. A core challenge for SAGE is making inference-time simulation efficient without sacrificing representation quality. We introduce the first formalization of this problem, based upon an axiom from proportional clustering known as metric proportional justified representation+ (mPJR+) which is the strongest proportionality axiom known to always be satisfiable by centroid-based clustering. We prove that to proportionally represent the viewpoints of a population of

n_H

humans on a given prompt, we need only create simulations of

n \ll n_H

individuals, and at inference time, need only dynamically route to

k \ll n

of those simulations based upon the prompt. This twofold reduction still yields approximate proportional representation guarantees for the entire population. Empirically, across two domains-political questions and personal advice-our proposed routing algorithm achieves higher mPJR+ satisfaction rates than

k

-means-based or random selection baselines.

Sonja Kraiczy, Smitha Milli, Ratip Emin Berker +6

University of Oxford · PrincInt · FAIR at Meta +4

Scaling Improve Social Simulation Majority Voting Choice

Sep 29, 2026cs.CL

Similar Choices, Different Attention: Cross-Modal Associations in Humans and Vision-Language Models

Cross-modal associations are systematic pairings of features across modalities, such as the association of 'bouba' with round shapes and 'kiki' with sharp shapes. Prior work has compared humans and vision-language models (VLMs) on such associations, but often using different stimuli or tasks between humans and models. Here, we ask whether VLMs align with humans not only in choices, but also in where they look when making those choices. We study both VLMs and humans (N = 53), presenting them with the same stimuli, a pseudo-word and two images, and record participants' choices and eye movements, which we release. We find choice alignment in a few larger VLMs, but their saliency matches human gaze less closely than a center-bias baseline, a fixed Gaussian at the center of each image. Fine-tuning small VLMs on human choices brings their choice alignment to the level of a human majority-vote reference on unseen words and images, yet their attention still matches human gaze less closely than this baseline. Training model attention on human gaze raises attention-gaze correlation without improving choice alignment, and a single average gaze map per image position raises it by a similar amount. Matching human choices, or even human gaze patterns, is therefore not sufficient evidence of human-aligned cross-modal processing.

Sumin Hong, Katsumi Ibaraki, Renee Shi +2

University of Notre Dame

Cross-Modal Dynamic Attention Choice

Sep 28, 2026cs.MA

Positional choice and robust collective behavior in fish schools: biohybrid experiments and modeling

Collective behavior of fish schools is usually modeled on the assumption that each individual follows specific rules of motion that depend on its position and velocity relative to its neighbors. Although these models reproduce many schooling patterns observed in nature, it remains unclear whether the assumed rules are realistic at the individual level. To address this question, we first analyzed a set of experiments in which a live fish interacted with four moving robotic fish in a tank, and measured the time it spent in each position relative to the robots. We then simulated this experiment, replacing the fish with an agent, and assessed the extent to which classical models agree with the experimental observations. An extensive exploration of the parameter space showed that these models closely matched the experimental observations, with a very specific choice of parameters. However, they were highly sensitive to the parameter values: a minor perturbation caused them to fail completely. To resolve this, we propose a new model that incorporates an additional exploratory term characterizing the agent's positional preference at every moment. This model proved robust to small errors in the parameters while successfully replicating the experiments. Furthermore, when generalised to multiple fish, the model reproduced schooling behaviour and common schooling patterns, while also exhibiting exploratory behaviour at both the individual and the school level. This shows that social cohesion coexists with individual exploratory behaviour, and that realistic models of collective behaviour should account for both social interactions and this exploratory component.

Vahagn Grigoryan, Donato Romano, Cesare Stefanini +1

Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE · BioRobotics Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy · Division of Computing and Mathematical Science, MBZUAI, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Collective Behaviors Fish Agent Behavior Modeling Choice

Sep 28, 2026cs.CL

Echoes of Deeds: Moral History Can Shape and Steer LLM Behavioral Choices

Evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) morality typically consider decisions in isolation, thus overlooking whether an individual's unrelated prior conduct influences the model's subsequent choices. This leaves open the question of whether, and to what extent, moral history shapes LLM decisional behaviors. Prior work on human moral decision-making shows that past behavior can influence subsequent moral choices. Building on this observation, we investigate whether analogous effects emerge in LLMs in two complementary ways: at the behavioral level, through the model's observable responses, and at the representation level, through its latent internal representations. We introduce MoralLedger, a framework for studying how an actor's moral history shapes actions for LLMs' behaviors under a fixed decision context. At the behavioral level, we find that prior moral histories systematically alter subsequent choices as a function of their valence and intensity. At the internal representation level, these histories induce a linearly recoverable direction in the residual stream that generalizes to held-out examples. Intervening along this direction on neutral-history prompts produces two-sided intensity-dependent changes in subsequent choices, with effects that are stronger than those induced by prompting alone or by favorable-nonmoral direction. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that a latent representation of an actor's prior moral conduct can provide signed inference-time control over a moral decision. Our MoralLedger extends moral evaluation beyond static dilemmas, establishing moral history as both a source of behavioral sensitivity and a causal target for auditing and controlling moral behavior in LLMs.

Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli

DIMES Dept., University of Calabria, Italy

Moral Reasoning Large Language Model Decisions Choice

Sep 28, 2026cs.AI

Decision Readouts for Text-Mediated Video Anomaly Detection: An Exploratory Evaluation of Jev and Qwen

How much does the decision readout matter when video-derived textual evidence is held fixed? We evaluate Jev typed decisions and three Qwen readouts on a sparse development sample of 40 videos and 400 target anchors from UCF-Crime and XD-Violence, each presented as a summary and ordered captions. Each dataset contributes 20 source groups and 200 anchors, including only 10 and 37 positives, respectively. The original five-backend pilot requested 4,000 predictions; Jev Choice returned 776 valid responses out of 800 under the study's strict numerical policy, blocking its full-coverage quality comparison. On XD captions, Jev Noul achieved 75.99% average precision versus 48.47% for Qwen generated probability and 57.81% for the stronger local ordinal-likelihood expectation. The latter paired difference was 18.18 percentage points (95% source-group bootstrap interval 5.53-31.50). UCF did not show a corresponding advantage: caption ROC-AUC was 52.26% for Noul and 65.95% for ordinal likelihood. Both probability readouts had higher, hence worse, UCF Brier scores than the evaluation-prevalence reference of 0.0475. We additionally audit historical LAVAD scores at exactly matched anchors and distinguish response structure from numerical consistency. A binary-likelihood control is missing. These exploratory offline results characterize ranking, probability quality and interface failures; they establish neither a causal typed-interface benefit nor general superiority, calibration or end-to-end acceleration.

Xukui Qin, Youting Wang, Xinjie He +4

Independent researchers

Training-Free Video Anomaly Detection Readout Qwen3 Choice

Sep 24, 2026cs.AI

From Text Decisions to Pixels: An Study of Jev-Style Visual Choice Model

Visual software often needs a decision over supplied alternatives rather than a generated explanation. We present PixelJev, a native-image decision interface that maps an image, a task instruction, and a runtime candidate set to a structured choice and candidate-conditioned probabilities using small open multimodal models. Its initial realization unifies recognition and multiplechoice visual question answering through an existing language-model readout, with separately evaluated options for frozen inference, language-side adaptation, and held-out calibration. Across seven benchmark evaluations, 64-shot source adaptation raises Pets accuracy from 60.13% to 92.40% across optimization seeds and transfers to natural resampling, new texture labels, and A-OKVQA without target fitting, while frozen inference already supports both VQA tasks. A matched prompt-only follow-up on Pets and ScienceQA attributes the large Pets gain to adaptation and identifies a narrower output validity benefit of candidate readout in adapted VQA. Specialist DINOv2 probes remain stronger on source recognition, frozen 4B is stronger than adapted 2B on DTD and ScienceQA, and accuracy gains do not ensure calibrated target probabilities. These findings establish a working starting point for general-purpose visual decision models and identify the remaining requirements: schema robustness, cross-family transfer, and reliable use of visual evidence.

Xunlan Zhou, Xianliang Yang, Li Zhao

School of Intelligence Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Suzhou, China · Microsoft Research Asia

Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering Pixels Large Multimodal Models Choice

Sep 23, 2026cs.CL

Script Choice in LLMs: Evidence for Late-Layer Commitment

In this paper, we investigate how script knowledge is distributed across the layers of LLMs using two complementary interpretability methods: logistic regression probing and logit-lens analysis. Our probing experiments reveal a clear asymmetry: both the input script and the instructed output script are encoded in the earliest layers of the network, while, in contrast, commitment to the actual output script emerges only in the final layers, with the model's intermediate representations defaulting to Latin throughout most of the layers. This two-stage process is confirmed by logit-lens analyses, which show that script commitment consistently occurs at the very last layers of the LLMs. Together with the weaker script-following performance observed in smaller models, these results form a converging body of evidence linking script commitment to model depth, with broader implications for the design of sufficiently deep, inclusive multilingual architectures.

David Kletz, Sandra Mitrović, Itay Sabato +2

SUPSI, IDSIA, Switzerland · Independent Researcher · armasuisse, Science & Technology, Switzerland

Cryptographic Merkle Tree Commitments Commitment Logit Lens Interpretability Multilingual Language Models Choice

Sep 23, 2026stat.ML

Selective Inference for Deep Clustering in Latent Spaces

Deep clustering is a powerful approach for discovering meaningful structures in high-dimensional data by learning a low-dimensional latent representation prior to clustering. Despite its empirical success, assessing the statistical reliability of the resulting clusters remains challenging. Testing discovered clusters on the same data induces selection bias and invalidates classical

p

-values. Selective inference (SI) provides a principled framework for correcting this bias, but existing methods focus on clustering performed directly on the observed features. In this work, we develop an SI framework for deep clustering with a fixed pretrained encoder. The key challenge is that cluster assignments are determined through a nonlinear transformation from the original data space to the latent space, resulting in a substantially more complex selection process than in conventional clustering. Our method provides a computationally tractable way to account for this process and enables valid statistical testing of differences between clusters identified in the latent space. Synthetic experiments demonstrate that the proposed method controls the Type I error rate while achieving higher power than valid but conservative baselines, and genomic applications show that it can identify significant cluster differences while appropriately accounting for selection bias. Our framework provides a principled approach to quantifying the statistical reliability of structures discovered by deep clustering.

Eina Mizui, Tomohiro Shiraishi, Shunichi Nishino +1

Nagoya University · RIKEN

Clustering Latent Space Choice

Sep 22, 2026cs.AI

Type-Safe Is Not Error-Free: A Constrained Decision Head Follows the Option Name, Not the Rubric Bound to It

Typed decision models are built for settings where model outputs are consumed directly by software. Instead of generating free-form text, they return a decision over a predefined set of options. By construction, every output conforms to the required schema. Yet this guarantee does not tell us whether the model interprets the options as intended. We study Jev and two Jev-like models with open weights by changing how option names are assigned to rubrics. Each option consists of an option name and a textual rubric that defines what the option means. We change only which option name is assigned to each rubric; the question, state, rubric wording, and set of option names remain exactly the same. On 1200 workflow decisions with task-specific rubrics, renaming the two options from 0/1 to no/yes changes 70.4 more answers per hundred (95% CI: [67.6, 73.1]) and shifts AUC from .94 to .23, revealing a systematic reversal in the decision ranking rather than simple uncertainty. The same operation has little effect with neutral option names. This pattern holds across all 4 predicates, where the effect is at least 7.4x larger than under the neutral control, and becomes stronger as the number of options increases. The effect also depends on the read-out geometry: a second model family that mean-pools over the full option span flips 4.1x less often. The hosted model exhibits the same behavior: the swap changes AUC from .8146 to .5806 and produces 24x as many answer flips as its test-retest floor. In contrast, replacing the option names with random character strings returns all model families to the neutral-control regime without reducing accuracy. The failure therefore depends on the semantic polarity of the option names rather than on the renaming operation itself. Across all conditions, the type-error rate remains 0%, even when decision accuracy degrades substantially.

Yu Sun, Junhao Xu, Jiajia Shi +1

Fudan University · University of Science and Technology of China

Decisions Choice Rubrics Neutrality

Sep 21, 2026cs.CL

Jev for Scientific Decisions: Evaluating Semantic Choices and Their Consequences

Scientific workflows often require choosing among known relations before a deterministic calculation can proceed. Whether observations share a culture, treatment or reference standard can change the scientific meaning of the resulting count or comparison. We evaluate Jev as a semantic decision component using a harness that follows its documented guidance and assigns arithmetic to code. The study compares twelve model configurations on twenty source-grounded Choices across ten scientific cases, each repeated five times. We measure semantic selections, downstream outputs and final claim labels separately. Jev matched five other configurations at complete semantic correctness and achieved the lowest observed median latency among successful responses. Across three comparison models, seven wrong selections on one culture-history question changed downstream counts while preserving the correct final label. These results identify a useful role for Jev in prepared scientific decision tasks and show why evaluating that role requires checking the relations and quantities that a workflow will reuse.

Boyuan Deng, Shuyi Fan, Hongyang Zhang +1

Johns Hopkins University · Columbia University · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University +1

Scientific Workflows Scientific Discovery Decisions Choice Implications

Sep 18, 2026cs.CL

How Many Humans Are 32 LLM Judges Worth?

A panel's human-equivalent size is target-specific. Matching a fixed 32-judge panel to empirical human label distributions on three ChaosNLI tasks yields two distinct effective sizes: distributional-error matching gives

ν_{\mathrm{MSE}}=2.304

,

3.750

, and

3.445

, whereas spectral matching gives

ν_H=4.242

,

6.459

, and

6.499

, a gap of

1.72

--

1.89\times

; a binary-error diagnostic credits the same panels with only

1.971

--

2.227

effective votes. Extrapolating the distributional-error curve at fixed squared mean residual, mean member variance, and normalized mean covariance gives asymptotes of

2.392

,

3.990

, and

3.655

, with 32 judges already reaching

94.0

--

96.3\%

. An exact spectral identity explains the gap: error depends on member energy and on the orientation of residual variation relative to averaging, information that the participation ratio (PR) discards. A realizable hard-label construction confirms that higher spectral diversity can coexist with worse distribution recovery even under equal member energies and nonnegative correlations, and the consensus direction retains

γ_{\mathrm{co}}=43.8\%

,

33.7\%

, and

35.9\%

of centered residual variance. An external check on CC-1000, a 1,000-item Civil Comments subset with a different panel, gives

ν_H=2.84

. For panel choice, we establish an existence result and one feasible path: exhaustive enumeration at

k\in\{5,7\}

shows that panels beating the accuracy-top-

k

baseline on both accuracy and

ν_H

always exist, and greedily swapping at most two members reaches

24.8

--

56.0\%

higher

ν_H

at

0.10

--

1.10

percentage points higher accuracy. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/Chao1208/32judges-votes.

Chao Li, Yingying Yu, Yunfeng Li

Tsinghua University · University College London · Hebei University of Economics and Business

Judges Large Language Model Judges Choice Variance

Sep 16, 2026cs.CL

Reporting Practice Matters: The Impact of Reference Choice on Chest X-ray Report Evaluation

Radiologists follow heterogeneous reporting practices. Two radiologists examining the same image and identifying the same clinical findings might nevertheless compose superficially distinct reports, varying in terminology, shorthand, formatting, and level of detail. These variations in reporting norms represent an under-appreciated obstacle in efforts to evaluate AI-based radiology report generation (RRG) models, where machine-generated reports are typically assessed based on their concordance with human-generated references. In this paper, we quantify the sensitivity of established evaluation metrics to variations in reporting practices, revealing impacts large enough to alter the rankings of models. We introduce a radiologist-informed taxonomy of variations in radiology reporting practice and a method (ReRef) that rewrites reference reports along the axes of our taxonomy while preserving clinical interpretation. For instance, when comparing the performance of nine RRG models on MIMIC-CXR using RadCliQ-v1, condensing the discussion of normal findings in the reference reports causes Libra to drop from first to second place while CheXOne rises from third to first. Our results suggest that many current metrics fail to decouple clinical interpretation from conformity to reporting practices and that choosing the ``right'' references that accurately reflect the desired reporting practices can be important in practice. To support future research, we release MIMIC-CXR-Ext-ReRef, a radiologist-validated dataset of 120 (original, alternative) reference report pairs derived from MIMIC-CXR.

Daniel P. Jeong, Charles Q. Li, Hossein Hosseiny +5

Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University · Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Allegheny Health Network · Data Science R&D, Highmark Health Enterprise Data & Analytics +1

Radiology Report Generation Chest X-Ray Report Choice Impact Analysis

Sep 16, 2026econ.GN

Multitask Reinforcement Learning for Assisting Choice Model Specification

Discrete choice model specification is a time-consuming task in which modellers often specify and estimate multiple models while balancing goodness-of-fit, parsimony, and behavioural plausibility. We present Delphos, a multitask reinforcement learning framework that learns transferable specification strategies across transport choice datasets. Delphos frames model specification as a sequential decision-making problem in which it applies a sequence of modelling actions and receives feedback from an estimation environment based on model performance and convergence. To transfer modelling decisions across datasets with different sets of variables, Delphos represents utility specifications as sets of modelling terms using a DeepSet-Q architecture, allowing a shared specification policy to learn across multiple datasets. Trained on nine transport choice datasets, Delphos consistently outperforms independently trained single-task agents, indicating that sharing modelling experience improves learning efficiency and helps identify promising sequences of modelling decisions with fewer unsuccessful estimation attempts. When applied without further training to the unseen Swissmetro and Decisions datasets, the same agent identifies competitive specifications in less than 20 minutes on a standard CPU. It achieves a higher log-likelihood per observation than the VNS metaheuristic on Swissmetro and performance comparable to a published MNL specification developed by expert modellers on Decisions. These findings show that accumulating and reusing modelling experience enables Delphos to function as an intelligent assistant for discrete choice model specification. It reduces manual trial-and-error while allowing modellers to retain control over model diagnosis, refinement, and final selection.

Gabriel Nova, Stephane Hess, Sander Van Cranenburgh

CityAI Lab, Transport and Logistics Group, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands · Institute for Transport Studies and Choice Modelling Centre, University of Leeds, UK

Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning New Tasks Choice Transport

Sep 16, 2026econ.GN

Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders

Large language models (LLMs) now serve as conversational shopping assistants on platforms that also sell advertising. These AI agents face a conflict of duty. They advise consumers who rely on their judgment, yet are deployed by platforms that benefit when sponsored listings are chosen. Sponsorship disclosures, designed to allow consumers to penalize paid placements, now reach the AI agent rather than the consumer, and the agent's evaluation of them is hidden from the consumer. Drawing on the fiduciary concept of conflict of duty, we argue that an agent's evaluation of a sponsored listing should not depend on which party deployed it. In controlled choice experiments, we manipulate assigned roles in the system prompt to name either a traveler or a booking platform as the agent's principal. Platform delegation significantly attenuates the penalty that agents apply to sponsored listings and weakens the skepticism that disclosure triggers in their reasoning traces. We replicate out findings across LLMs and reasoning depths. A second study decomposes the disclosure label and shows that the divergence between the two delegates widens significantly when the paid placement is attributed to the platform. Stricter terminology ("Sponsored" instead of "Promoted") lowers choice of paid listings but does not close this gap when the platform is named. The findings show that disclosure mandates designed for human consumers cannot by themselves protect consumers in AI-mediated commerce.

Davood Wadi, Yu Ma

Desautels Faculty of Management McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Agentic Commerce Disclosures Artificial Intelligence Agents Biases Role Delegation+1

Sep 15, 2026cs.LG

Learning Options for Compositional Motor Control with Adapter Banks

Learning flexible motor primitives is a hallmark of skilled motor control. Recent neuroscience theory proposes that motor primitives may be implemented as low-rank perturbations of a shared recurrent network, but leaves open how such a system is learned. We translate this principle into a novel architecture for learning motor skills end-to-end: a shared recurrent core modulated by a bank of residual adapters, each selected by a discrete latent code. Trained on closed-loop biomechanical control, the adapters develop emergent low-rank perturbations of the recurrent dynamics despite no architectural rank constraint, placing task representations in disparate subspaces of the shared core network. A simple high-level policy over the learned options, optimized while the whole network is frozen, sequences the low-rank adapters to produce novel out-of-distribution movements. We demonstrate the ability to generalize to novel motor sequences within the closed-loop control setting, improving on the generalization error of a task-input-conditioned multitask baseline by upto order of magnitude.

Sreejan Kumar, Marcelo Mattar, Lea Duncker

Columbia University · New York University

Sensorimotor Experience Learn Recurrence Multi--Task Learning Choice

Sep 14, 2026cs.AI

Can AI systems have free will?

While there has been much discussion of whether AI systems could function as moral agents or acquire sentience, there has been very little discussion of whether AI systems could have free will. I sketch a framework for thinking about this question, inspired by Daniel Dennett's work. I argue that, to determine whether an AI system has free will, we should not look for some mysterious property, expect its underlying algorithms to be indeterministic, or ask whether the system is unpredictable. Rather, we should simply ask whether we have good explanatory reasons to view the system as an intentional agent, with the capacity for choice between alternative possibilities and control over the resulting actions. If the answer is "yes", then the system counts as having free will in a pragmatic and diagnostically useful sense.

Christian List

Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Ethics Artificial Intelligence Systems Moral Reasoning Choice Free

Aug 8, 2026cs.AI

Constraining ontology mappings using metaphysical choices

In this paper we discuss the foundations behind a novel methodology for the validation of semantic mappings between different data sources based upon different foundation ontologies, where the methodology builds a framework based upon the metaphysical commitments of the ontologies. We provide as example the test case of mappings between IES and BFO, and we especially focused on providing cardinality constraints on the mappings between the two ontologies. In order to demonstrate the applicability of our method, we showcased how these principles can be operationalized through SPARQL queries validating the results of a mapping pipeline.

Giacomo De Colle, Helena Blackmore, Chris Partridge

Ontology Semantic Mapping Sparql Cardinality Methodology Choice

Aug 6, 2026cs.SE

LangChoiceBench: Measuring and Explaining Programming-Language Choice in LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to exhibit strong Python preferences when generating project-level code, but there is currently no systematic way to measure this behaviour across new models. To bridge this gap, we introduce LangChoiceBench, a project-level code-generation benchmark for measuring Python preference, recommendation-implementation consistency, and language diversity. LangChoiceBench covers 28 projects across seven software areas where Python is often a poor default. We evaluate 25 diverse LLMs and find that Python remains heavily over-selected, recommendation-implementation consistency is low, and smaller open-weight models generally show stronger Python preference and lower language diversity. We further analyse 9,826 reasoning traces and find that most Python choices are automatic or driven primarily by ease, rather than explicit consideration of project requirements. In a smaller but important set of cases, models fabricate contextual support for choosing Python - a failure mode we call phantom evidence - or produce code that contradicts the language selected in their own reasoning.

Lukas Twist, Twm Stone, Helen Yannakoudakis +1

King’s College London, London, UK · MATS Research

Large Language Model Benchmarks Choice Preference Alignment Learning Recommendation Quality Explainable AI Methods

Aug 4, 2026cs.LG

Quantization Effects on Biomedical LLM Reliability

When decoder language models are used as classifiers, predicted class probabilities depend on implementation choices, including the prompt template, verbalizer (label-to-token mapping), and scoring rule, that are rarely treated as experimental variables. We present a controlled evaluation of three Mistral-7B variants (Base, BioMistral, and Instruct) on PubMed RCT sentence classification (n=2000) under FP16, INT8, and INT4 precision using four answer-text prompt templates. Our primary finding is that the probability extraction protocol dominates apparent calibration. Switching from summed to mean token log-likelihood scoring reverses the calibration ranking between models: BioMistral average expected calibration error increases from 0.097 to 0.289, whereas Instruct decreases from 0.237 to 0.096, while accuracy changes by less than 1 percentage point for the specialized models but 4-6 percentage points for the base model. Prompt template choice produces accuracy differences of 7-24 percentage points, comparable to or larger than model-level effects. On one template, BioMistral outperforms Instruct although the overall mean favors Instruct by only 1.3 percentage points. For BioMistral and Instruct, INT8 quantization changes accuracy and F1 by only 1-2 percentage points relative to FP16, whereas the base model shows larger INT8 effects on some templates (up to +4.2 percentage points). INT4 produces heterogeneous but non-catastrophic effects. Temperature scaling reduces expected calibration error under summed scoring for both models but only for that scoring rule. A fine-tuned PubMedBERT reference achieves 82.7% accuracy but uses about 176000 labeled training examples, precluding direct comparison. These results demonstrate that prompt template design and scoring normalization are first-order experimental decisions when evaluating decoder language model calibration.

Anton Rasmussen, Hong Qin

Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529, USA

Large Language Model Reliability Large Language Model Quantization Quantized Choice

Aug 3, 2026cs.LG

Neural Networks with Local Converging Inputs for Efficient Options Pricing Models

We present a novel application of Neural Networks with Local Converging Inputs (NNLCI) to improve the efficiency of existing numerical methods for pricing multi-asset options. The most concise input format for NNLCI has been introduced, offering substantial convenience and efficiency. NNLCI uses a neural network to locally correct solutions from a coarse mesh and a refined mesh (relative to the coarse one), requiring only a minimal amount of high-fidelity training data. We demonstrate this approach on cash-or-nothing options under the Black-Scholes equation in one, two, and three spatial dimensions, and on single-asset down-and-out barrier call options under the Heston stochastic-volatility model (whose pricing PDE is two-dimensional in the spot price

S

and the instantaneous variance

v

). In each case, NNLCI reduces the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the refined-mesh numerical solution by a factor of approximately 4-12 on test sets, even when the neural network is trained on only a small subset of parameter combinations. These results demonstrate that NNLCI significantly reduces computational requirements for high-dimensional problems in real-time options trading and risk management, offering low training costs and strong generalization ability.

Harris Cobb, Wenbo Hao, Yingjie Liu

School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332

Mathematical Finance Classical Numerical Solver Neural Network Convergence Choice

Jul 30, 2026cs.LG

An analysis of machine learning approaches for enhancing decision-making in complex discrete choice tasks

Discrete choice modeling is a common tool used for preference elicitation during policy-making, but this is typically done through parametric models. Machine learning can push the boundaries of discrete choice modeling for policy-based preference elicitation by adopting a data-driven approach or learning individual preferences. However, there is limited knowledge of how well machine learning methods can estimate individual discrete choice rules under individual heterogeneity, especially in the context of challenges often experienced during preference elicitation. This study evaluates four machine learning models (multinomial logistic regression, generalized additive model, twinned neural network, and Gaussian process) with respect to their capacity to learn and predict five choice rules that are important in the behavioral and social sciences (linear strong utility, monotonic strong utility, ideal point, lexicographic semiorder, and multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator). Monte Carlo experiments were performed to assess model performance when increasing a) the number of attributes in the choice alternatives, b) the number of training choice sets, and c) the choice rule's determinism. The simulation results demonstrated that semi-parametric and non-parametric models generally outperform parametric models across all choice rules and experimental contexts. Model performance also generally improves by 6% to 96% and 0% to 55%, respectively, with an increase in training choice sets and choice rule determinism. A case study using real energy policy preference data was also conducted, where TNN performed best with a BIC of 13.351. This work demonstrated the viability and limitations of semi-parametric and non-parametric models in the context of policy-centric discrete choice modeling and showed how the choice task context should drive model selection.

Sheng Lun Christine Cao, Destenie Nock, Alex Davis

Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada · Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA · Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA +1

Discrete Choice Models Preference Learning Model Selection Choice Preference Alignment Learning

Jul 28, 2026cs.AI

Nudging Sustainable Choices through LLM-Generated Recommendation Explanations

Recommender systems mediate everyday consumption, offering a promising channel for encouraging sustainable choices. Prior research shows that explanations influence users' perceptions of recommendations and can support more informed decisions. We argue that explanations can also serve as behavioral nudges by foregrounding sustainability information at the moment of choice. This study investigates how different behavioral framings of sustainability information in recommendation explanations affect user choices and perceptions. Using generative AI, we generate sustainability-aware explanations by drawing on nudge theory and validate them through human evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge audits. Building on this foundation, we conduct two randomized studies (N = 529) in a low involvement domain (instant coffee) and a high involvement domain (hotel bookings), in which participants choose among preference matched recommendations accompanied by these explanations. Our results show that, across both domains, merely disclosing sustainability information in explanations does not change choices, whereas framing that information or invoking a descriptive social norm significantly increases sustainable selections and eases decision-making. Notably, perception and behavior diverge, as plain disclosure improves explanation evaluations without translating into more sustainable selection behavior. Our work demonstrates how LLMs can generate theory-grounded explanations at scale, pointing toward practical explanation-based interventions for social good. We conclude by discussing implications for adaptive explanation design with generative AI.

Haya Halimeh, Dietmar Jannach, Oliver Müller

Paderborn University, Germany · University of Klagenfurt, Austria

Nudges Sustainability Recommendation Explainable AI Methods Choice

Jul 8, 2026cs.LG

The Importance of Encoder Choice:A Tabular-Image Study

Multimodal learning usually requires a dedicated encoder per modality. When a tabular modality is involved, prior work has been mostly using a \emph{plain MLP} as the encoder. Yet if it were a strong encoder, the tabular domain would not be ``the last unconquered castle for deep learning''. This study evaluates state-of-the-art tabular models as encoders in the image-tabular setting for the first time. An obstacle stands out. In-Context Learning models, among the best performing methods in the tabular domain, require labels to process instances, making it non-trivial to embed training and test instances the same way. We addressed this problem across multiple models of this family. With this study, we would like to highlight the importance of encoder factor in the multimodal learning.

Ilia Koloiarov, Diego Coello de Portugal Mecke, Vijaya Krishna Yalavarthi +2

ISMLL & VWFS DARC · University of Hildesheim · Hildesheim, Germany +1

Multimodal Learning Encoders Tabular Data In-Context Learning Importance Choice

Jul 3, 2026cs.LG

OpFlow: Learning Opportunity-Conditioned Choice Potentials for Robust OD Flow Prediction

Origin-destination (OD) flow prediction is central to urban analytics, yet deep models trained on raw counts remain vulnerable to distribution shift. The core problem is that raw count supervision cannot distinguish transferable choice mechanisms from environment-specific shortcuts. Raw OD count mixes two objects: how much demand an origin produces and how that demand is allocated across destinations. We argue that the transferable object is the exposure-to-choice law that maps spatial conditions to relative destination preferences. We propose OpFlow, a mechanism-constrained framework that learns row-centered choice potentials and reconstructs flows by combining the induced allocation with a separately calibrated origin scale. Under distribution shift, spatial exposures and the induced allocations are allowed to vary; what transfers is the conditional map from exposure states to relative choice potentials. Theoretically, we characterize the identifiable row-centered potential and show that classical spatial interaction laws are restricted log-potential cases. Controlled synthetic shifts and a real-world experiment show OpFlow improves robustness under environment shifts.

Changjian Liu, Yong Gao, Yuqing Wang +5

School of Earth and Space Sciences Peking University China, CN 100871 · College of Artificial Intelligence Zhejiang University China, CN 310027

Origin Destination Flows Flow Models Distribution Shifts Accurate Traffic Forecasting Discrete Choice Models Optical Flow+2

Jul 1, 2026cs.CV

Creating Impactful Autonomous Driving Datasets: A Strategic Guide from Research Gap to Benchmark

Well-designed autonomous driving datasets have fundamentally shaped research progress, yet existing literature primarily describes what datasets contain rather than how to strategically design impactful ones. This is especially limiting for small and medium-sized labs and startups that cannot afford to misallocate scarce resources. We argue that impactful dataset creation begins with a diagnosis: whether a research question is blocked by a data problem or an evaluation problem, and proceeds by selecting the minimal data operator(s) that closes the resulting gap, recording new data only when no cheaper operator(s) suffices. We analyze the evolution of major autonomous driving (AD) datasets through this lens and distill a strategic framework spanning gap identification, operator choice, sensor suite design, and annotation strategy. We ground the framework in a running case study of our KITScenes dataset family. The datasets are available at: https://kitscenes.com/

Richard Schwarzkopf, Jonas Merkert, Frank Bieder +22

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) · FZI Research Center for Information Technology, Karlsruhe

Naturalistic Driving Data Scale Gap Choice

Jun 30, 2026cs.CR

Probe Choice Changes Canary-Memorization Verdicts: Three Post-Hoc Disagreement Case Studies in a Text-Dominant LoRA-Tuned Autoregressive Testbed

We audit a fixed prefix-window mean-NLL memorization probe (K=20) on a Qwen2.5-VL-7B canary testbed and report three post-hoc cases where it disagrees with full-span secret NLL or greedy exact-recall. C3 (false negative, window truncation): damage lands on hex tokens outside K=20; the probe stays flat while hit@1 drops. C4 (false positive, non-secret drift): the probe moves, but approximately 99% sits on non-secret preamble; the secret span and hit@1 are unchanged. C5 (ambiguous in-window drop): the probe falls on an undertrained baseline while full-span hex is positive and hit@1=0. Recommendation: report (i) full-span secret NLL, (ii) a span-localised decomposition, (iii) behavioural exact-recall at k>=4, and (iv) decoy probes before asserting secret-specificity. Evidence is on controlled canaries in one backbone; magnitudes are testbed-specific.

Zhichao Fan, Zexin Zhuang, Yanhang Li

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · Southern Methodist University · Northeastern University

Conversational Memory Verdict Post-Hoc Choice Text Dominance

Jun 26, 2026cs.LG

Geometric Measurements of the Axiom of Choice in Neural Proof Embeddings

The axiom of choice has divided the foundations of mathematics for over a century, but the distinction between classical and constructive proofs has remained a philosophical and methodological one. We use Lean 4's kernel-level tracking of axiom dependence to show that the axiom of choice has a measurable geometric correlate in proof space that obeys a one-parameter mixture law and has operational consequences for neural theorem provers. To do this, we partition

471{,}260

declarations of Mathlib by transitive dependence on the axiom of choice and represent a filtered population of

42{,}355

traced theorems by their sequences of tactic invocations. We use the constructive proofs in this dataset to train a self-supervised proof encoder and show that when using it to measure classical proofs, three complementary measurements (anomaly score, reconstruction loss, and density-superlevel containment) exhibit a common decline with the proof's distance from the axiom in the dependency graph, from sharp separation at the shallow boundary (AUC

0.847

at distance

2

) to indistinguishability at distance~

9{+}

. Robustness controls show that the signature survives length, file, author, and topic controls, and replicates under full-source encoders trained on normalised proof source. Operationally, we show that on an evaluation sample of

251

Mathlib theorems, Lean's \texttt{aesop} tactic solves constructive theorems at

13\times

the rate of classical ones, and a neural-guided hybrid using the ReProver tactic generator compresses the gap to

5\times

. The geometric anomaly score predicts \texttt{aesop} failure beyond proof length, providing an operational link between the geometric signature and prover performance.

Rodrigo Mendoza-Smith

Independent Researcher.

Proof Axiom Indistinguishability Choice Anomaly Score

Jun 18, 2026cs.CL

The Almost Intelligent Revolution: Options for Scaling Up Deliberation and Empowering People with AI

The increasing prominence of Large Language Models (LLMs) in public discourse presents both opportunities and challenges for democratic deliberation. While red teaming strategies help mitigate specific risks, broader concerns persist regarding linguistic constraints, biases, and the sycophantic tendencies of LLMs. This chapter explores how LLMs can be used to significantly scale up and democratise deliberation, particularly in fostering inclusivity and empowering traditionally marginalised groups. Drawing on concepts from Systemic-Functional Linguistics, the chapter examines how variations across language users (for example, with respect to socio-demographic groups) and across language use (for example, with respect to communicative functions) shape participation in AI-supported deliberation. The chapter presents AI-driven deliberation studies and assesses their potential to scaffold argumentation, enhance access, and reduce the influence of exclusionary linguistic norms and biases which are embedded in prestigious registers. At the same time, the chapter cautions against both overclaiming, which leads to unrealistic expectations, and underclaiming, which risks missed opportunities for AI-assisted engagement. The chapter concludes by identifying future research directions to maximise the democratic potential of AI-assisted participation while embedding ethical safeguards to counteract the reproduction of linguistic inequalities.

Serge Sharoff

School of Languages, Cultures and Societies, University of Leeds, UK

Deliberation Large Language Model Decisions Democracy Linguistics Discourse Choice

Jun 9, 2026cs.LG

A Unifying Lens on Supervised Fine-Tuning Through Target Distribution Design

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) typically maximizes the likelihood of every token in a demonstrated trajectory. However, an observed token can be non-unique, noisy, or misaligned with the model prior. Strictly fitting toward this one-hot target may be suboptimal, especially when the pretrained model encodes a rich knowledge prior. In this work, we reinterpret SFT as target distribution design: instead of studying only the loss objective, we analyze the token-level target that the loss drives the model to match. We introduce the Q-target framework, which decomposes SFT supervision into two explicit choices: (1) how strongly to rely on the observed token, and (2) how to allocate the remaining probability mass over alternatives. This perspective unifies many existing SFT variants as implicit choices of the target distribution Q. Building on this view, we propose Target-SFT which constructs the training objective directly from the desired target distribution. This method consistently outperforms across the ten reasoning dataset-model settings evaluated, showing the effectiveness of this target-based approach. Overall, our formulation reveals a more fundamental design principle for SFT training and opens a broader search space for SFT objectives.

Tong Xie, Yuanhao Ban, Yunqi Hong +3

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) · Arena

Supervised Finetuning Model Fine-Tuning Token-Level Uncertainty Lens Choice

Jun 4, 2026cs.CL

Measuring the sensitivity of LLM-based structured extraction to prompt, model, and schema choices in clinical discharge summaries

Large language models are increasingly used for structured extraction from clinical free-text notes, but the sensitivity of their output to upstream configuration choices is less understood than their accuracy on fixed benchmarks. This work measures that sensitivity without human-annotated ground truth, by holding the extraction task fixed and varying one choice at a time. The fixed schema comprises 17 clinical documentation flags on a three-way yes/no/not_documented value set and a 47-tag vocabulary for the primary admission reason. Three prompt variants expressing this schema were each run at two model sizes on MIMIC-IV v3.1 discharge summaries. Cross-prompt agreement was measured by Cohen's kappa on ICD-stratified subsets. A paired same-note comparison isolated the effect of model choice, and a post-hoc collapse of the three-way flags to binary tested the schema's contribution to disagreement. On the three-way flags, the two models reach the same pooled cross-prompt agreement (median kappa 0.69 and 0.68); the larger model raises agreement on some fields and lowers it on others, a redistribution rather than the absence of an effect. Collapsing the schema to binary dissolves most of the cross-prompt disagreement, locating it on the absence-versus-silence distinction rather than on whether the finding is present. On the multi-class admission categorization, changing the model reassigns the dominant tag on close to half of all notes while changing the prompt phrasing reassigns it on roughly one in eight, and the larger model places far less mass on residual catch-all categories (44% to 26%). These patterns indicate a schema-imposed source of disagreement concentrated on the absence-versus-silence axis and a dominance of model over prompt phrasing on multi-class categorization, identified by a reusable methodology for auditing extraction reproducibility on a population-scale deployment.

Martin Murin

DryLabz GmbH, Basel, Switzerland

Clinical Notes Large Language Model Pipelines Extraction Schema Choice

May 29, 2026cs.CL

The Latin Substrate: How Language Models Represent and Mediate Script Choice

Many languages are written in multiple scripts, requiring large language models (LLMs) to generate equivalent linguistic content in distinct orthographic forms. While prior work suggests that LLMs route information through shared latent representations, how they internally mediate script variation remains poorly understood. We study this question by first examining per-layer output distributions with the logit lens, which reveals consistent latent romanization during transliteration, and then through representational and mechanistic analyses of script generation. At the representational level, we show that scripts of the same language become increasingly separable across layers and that a simple linear steering direction can flip a model's output script while largely preserving semantic content. The vector generalizes to writing systems unseen during construction: it flips non-Latin output to Latin, but maps Latin output into varied non-Latin scripts. At the mechanistic level, we localize a small set of late-layer attention heads that causally mediate script choice. These heads transfer across unrelated languages and writing systems, suggesting that script routing is implemented by language-agnostic components. Across both analyses, we observe a consistent directional asymmetry: non-Latin output is produced by a compact, identifiable gate, while Latin-script output emerges from diffuse contributions across the model. Overall, our findings hint that LLMs organize script variation around shared latent representations while exhibiting a privileged substrate toward Latin script.

Daniil Gurgurov, Alan Saji, Katharina Trinley +2

D German Research Center for AI (DFKI) · I Indian Institute of Technology, Madras · H University of Hamburg +1

Representational Capacity Choice

May 26, 2026cs.LG

Auditing and Fixing Economic Validity in Tabular Foundation Models for Discrete Choice

Tabular foundation models achieve strong accuracy on choice prediction tasks, but their predictions often violate the economic logic those tasks require: raising a price sometimes increases predicted demand, and implied willingness-to-pay estimates are frequently negative or implausible. We propose a two-stage adapter that embeds foundation model predictions within a utility-maximization framework. In the first stage, we estimate a standard choice model whose parameters are constrained to obey economic theory. In the second stage, we freeze those parameters and train a correction term that incorporates the foundation model's predictions as additional information. The result is a model that inherits the foundation model's accuracy gains while guaranteeing monotonic price-demand relationships under policy perturbation and producing analytically computable trade-off measures. On two transportation datasets, the adapter recovers up to 13 percentage points of accuracy over a standard logit model while maintaining perfect economic consistency, something neither the raw foundation models nor conventional distillation achieve.

Yingshuo Wang, Xian Sun, Yanhang Li +2

University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA · Duke University, Durham, NC, USA · Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA +2

Discrete Choice Models Tabular Foundation Models Utility Maximization Economies Foundation Model Model Selection+2

May 20, 2026cs.LG

A Dialogue between Causal and Traditional Representation Learning: Toward Mutual Benefits in a Unified Formulation

Causal representation learning (CRL) and traditional representation learning have largely developed along different trajectories. Traditional representation learning has been driven mainly by applications and empirical objectives, whereas CRL has focused more on theoretical questions, particularly identifiability. This difference in emphasis has created a gap between the two fields in terminology, problem formulation, and evaluation, limiting communication and sometimes leading to disconnected or redundant efforts. In this paper, we argue that these two fields should be brought into dialogue rather than treated as separate paradigms. To this end, we introduce a unified formulation in which the representation learning is characterized by two components: a task component, which specifies what information the learned representation is required to preserve, and a constraint component, which specifies what structure is imposed on the latent space. Under this formulation, the benefits run in both directions. CRL provides theoretical tools for understanding when structured latent constraints are useful or necessary, while traditional representation learning offers practical insights on task design and objective choice that can improve the development of CRL methods. To illustrate this interaction, we experimentally study how different task components affect the behavior of CRL methods under different structured constraints. Results on CausalVerse show that the effectiveness of causal constraints depends strongly on the tasks with which they are paired.

Yan Li, Yuewen Sun, Shaoan Xie +4

1Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence · 2Carnegie Mellon University

Causal Representation Learning Representation Learning Causal Unified Formulation Choice

May 20, 2026cs.LG

Choose Wisely and Privately: Proactive Client Selection for Fair and Efficient Federated Learning

Federated Learning enables collaborative model training across decentralized data sources without data transfer. Averaging-based FL is limited by the presence of non-IID data, which negatively impacts convergence speed and final model accuracy. Conventional alternatives suffer from significant inefficiency. Clients with noisy or highly heterogeneous data contribute expensive gradient computations that are either discarded or heavily down-weighted before aggregation. These reactive approaches waste computational resources, require more communication rounds and result in unnecessary privacy exposure. In this paper, we propose a proactive client selection framework that aims to find an optimal federation of clients whose combined data match utility and fairness requirements before training begins. Our method relies on mutual information computed from differentially private contingency tables to quantify the relevance of cross-feature correlations in the union dataset. We introduce a Potential Federation Loss (PFL) over the set of fixed-size federations, which balances two objectives. Maximizing collective data utility while ensuring fair cross-features correlations to prevent group unfairness. Client selection is expressed as an optimal subset search problem over the PFL objective, which we solve using simulated annealing under strong differential privacy guarantees for clients' local statistics. Experimental results on four benchmarks show faster, fairer, and more accurate models trained on optimally found federations, compared to uniform sampling, even when state-of-the-art adaptive aggregation or sampling strategies are employed.

Adda Akram Bendoukha, Heber Hwang Arcolezi, Nesrine Kaaniche +1

Samovar, T´el´ecom SudParis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France · ´ETS Montr´eal · CEA-LIST

Federated Learning Algorithmic Fairness Choice

May 15, 2026cs.LG

Boundedly Rational Meta-Learning in Sequential Consumer Choice

Many consumer decisions are repeated choices under uncertainty. Standard models capture these decisions using Bayesian learning and dynamic programming: consumers update beliefs from feedback and use those beliefs to guide future choices. In many markets, however, learning does not restart when consumers enter a new context: prior experience with a brand, product, or provider can shape beliefs in later, related decisions. We study this cross-context knowledge transfer, or meta-learning, in sequential choice. We design a hierarchical laboratory task in which participants repeatedly choose among airlines across routes and observe noisy binary outcomes. Reduced-form evidence shows that participants improve not only within routes, but also across routes: they choose better airlines earlier in later routes and reduce pseudo-regret. To identify the mechanism behind this transfer, we compare human choices to a no-transfer benchmark and a fully integrated Bayesian meta-learning benchmark. In particular, we introduce a class of boundedly rational meta dynamic programming policies, BRMDP(D), that approximate full integration using a limited number of hyper-posterior draws, denoted by D. Trial-by-trial likelihood comparisons show that low-D boundedly rational meta-learning, especially BRMDP(1), fits participant behavior better than both no transfer and fully integrated Bayesian transfer. Consumers, therefore, transfer brand-level regularities across contexts, but through coarse representations of prior uncertainty. The findings imply that models of consumer learning should allow for approximate cross-context transfer, and that managerial counterfactuals based on either no-transfer or fully integrated learning can be misleading.

Mehrzad Khosravi, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Hema Yoganarasimhan

University of Washington

Meta-Learning Consumption Plan Regret Choice

May 14, 2026cs.LG

Language-Induced Priors for Domain Adaptation

Domain adaptation faces a fundamental paradox in the cold-start regime. When target data is scarce, statistical methods fail to distinguish relevant source domains from irrelevant ones, which often leads to negative transfer. In this paper, we address this challenge by leveraging expert textual descriptions of the target domain, a resource that is often available but overlooked. We propose a probabilistic framework that translates these semantic descriptions into a choice model, namely a Language-Induced Prior (LIP), that learns the preferences from a pretrained Large Language Model (LLM). The LIP is then integrated into an Expectation-Maximization algorithm to identify source relevance. Methodologically, this framework is compatible with any parametric model where a likelihood is available. It allows the LIP to guide the selection of sources when target signals are weak, while gradually refining these choices as samples accumulate. Theoretically, we prove that the estimator roughly matches an oracle cold-start MSE under a correct prior, while remaining asymptotically consistent regardless of the quality of the LIP. Empirically, we validated the framework on a descriptive (Gaussian estimation), a predictive (C-MAPSS dataset), and a prescriptive task (MuJoCo hopper).

Qiyuan Chen, Jiayu Zhou, Raed Al Kontar

Industrial and Operations Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 · School of Information University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Domain Adaptation Textual Priors Cold-Start Relevance Choice

May 12, 2026cs.CR

Options, Not Clicks: Lattice Refinement for Consent-Driven MCP Authorization

As Model Context Protocol adoption grows, securing tool invocations via meaningful user consent has become a critical challenge, as existing methods, broad always allow toggles or opaque LLM-based decisions, fail to account for dangerous call arguments and often lead to consent fatigue. In this work, we present Conleash, a client-side middleware that enforces boundary-scoped authorization by utilizing a risk lattice to auto-permit safe calls within known boundaries while escalating risks, a policy engine for user-defined invariants, and a refinement loop that converts user decisions into reusable rules. Evaluated on 984 real-world traces, Conleash achieved 98.2% accuracy, caught 99.4% of escalations, and added only 8.2 ms of overhead for policy verification; furthermore, in a user study where N=16, participants significantly preferred Conleash scoped permissions over traditional methods, citing higher trust and reduced prompting.

Ying Li, Yanju Chen, Peiran Wang +4

University of California, Los Angeles USA · University of California, San Diego USA · University of Texas at Arlington USA +1

Authorization Model Context Protocol Claw-Like Agent Choice Refinement

May 8, 2026cs.LG

Same Brain, Different Prediction: How Preprocessing Choices Undermine EEG Decoding Reliability

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a cornerstone of brain-computer interfaces and clinical neuroscience, yet deep learning models are typically trained and evaluated under a single, unreported preprocessing pipeline. We formalize preprocessing choices as a counterfactual intervention space and show that EEG predictions are surprisingly unstable under this space: across six datasets spanning four paradigms, up to 42% of trial-level predictions flip when only the preprocessing changes, a variability that standard uncertainty methods do not explicitly quantify because they condition on a fixed preprocessing pipeline. We provide three tools to make this instability measurable, decomposable, and reducible. First, a Walsh-Hadamard decomposition of the 2^7 pipeline space reveals that sensitivity is near-additive in practice under the binary intervention design, enabling efficient step-by-step optimization. Second, we introduce Preprocessing Uncertainty (PU), a per-trial diagnostic that captures a dimension of instability complementary to model-based confidence. Third, we study Normalized Adaptive PGI (NA-PGI), a graph-structured regularizer that exploits the compositional structure of preprocessing interventions as one mitigation strategy with clear scope conditions.

Dengzhe Hou, Zihao Wu, Lingyu Jiang +3

Tohoku University · University of Georgia · Texas A&M University +1

Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface Deep Learning Instability Choice

May 1, 2026cs.CL

Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in Dialogue

We model utterance production as probabilistic cost-sensitive choice over contextual alternatives, using information-theoretic notions of cost. We distinguish between goal-directed alternatives that realise a fixed communicative intent and goal-agnostic alternatives defined only by contextual plausibility, allowing us to derive speaker- and listener-oriented interpretations of different cost measures. We present a procedure to generate both types of alternative sets using language models. Analysing production choices in open-ended dialogue under both deterministic and probabilistic cost minimisation, we find that surprisal minimisation relative to goal-directed alternatives provides the strongest predictive account under both analyses. By contrast, uniform information density and length-based costs exhibit weaker and less consistent predictive power across conditions. More broadly, our study suggests that alternative-conditioned optimisation with LM-generated alternatives provides a principled framework for studying speaker and listener pressures in naturalistic language production.

Tom Utting, Mario Giulianelli, Arabella Sinclair

University of Aberdeen · University College London

Utterances Surprisal Alternative Fluency Dialogue Choice+1

Apr 18, 2026cs.CL

When Choices Become Risks: Safety Failures of Large Language Models under Multiple-Choice Constraints

We identify and systematically characterize a class of task-structural alignment failures in large language models (LLMs): even when the harmful intent remains unchanged, changing the task presentation and output constraints can substantially alter model safety behavior. Specifically, when a harmful request is reformulated as a forced-choice multiple-choice question (MCQ) in which all options are harmful and no refusal option is provided, some models that refuse the equivalent open-ended query instead select, prefer, or justify a harmful option. We evaluate 14 proprietary and open-source models on a bilingual Chinese-English human-authored dataset covering five harm categories, together with 900 model-generated Chinese adversarial MCQs. On human-authored data, attack success rate (ASR) increases sharply as prompts shift from open-ended queries to explicit forced-choice formats, typically peaking under intermediate levels of choice constraint. Model-generated Chinese MCQs further weaken or eliminate the recovery regime observed on human-authored data, driving ASR close to saturation for multiple models. The observed transfer patterns are consistent with stronger generators producing more difficult or boundary-adjacent MCQs, although other properties of the generated inputs may also contribute. We also find that adding an explicit refusal option or a safety preamble substantially reduces ASR for several high-capability models, often to near-zero levels, although their effectiveness varies across target models. These findings suggest that safety evaluations centered on open-ended generation may underestimate risks in structured deployment settings, and that task structure should be treated as an important and diagnosable dimension of safety evaluation and alignment training.

Yuheng Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Bowen Cheng +2

Kagoshima University · Fudan University · China University of Petroleum-Beijing

Large Language Model Safety Large Language Models Fail Safety Alignment Multiple-Choice Questions Violation Risk+1

Apr 16, 2026cs.CL

Pushing the Boundaries of Multiple Choice Evaluation to One Hundred Options

Multiple choice evaluation is widely used for benchmarking large language models, yet near ceiling accuracy in low option settings can be sustained by shortcut strategies that obscure true competence. Therefore, we propose a massive option evaluation protocol that scales the candidate set to one hundred options and sharply reduces the impact of chance performance. We apply this framework to a Korean orthography error detection task where models must pick the single incorrect sentence from a large candidate set. With fixed targets and repeated resampling and shuffling, we obtain stable estimates while separating content driven failures from positional artifacts. Across experiments, results indicate that strong performance in low option settings can overstate model competence. This apparent advantage often weakens under dense interference at high

N

, revealing gaps that conventional benchmarks tend to obscure. We identify two failure modes, semantic confusion and position bias toward early options under uncertainty. To isolate the effect of context length, we run padding controlled and length matched tests, which suggest that the main bottleneck is candidate ranking rather than context length. Together, these findings support massive option evaluation as a general framework for stress testing model reliability under extreme distractor density, beyond what low option benchmarks can reveal.

Nahyun Lee, Guijin Son

Chung-Ang University · Seoul National University

Large Language Model Evaluation Choice Distractor Boundaries

May 23, 2025stat.ML

Bayesian Deep Learning for Discrete Choice

Discrete choice models (DCMs) are used to analyze individual decision-making in contexts such as transportation choices, political elections, and consumer preferences. DCMs play a central role in applied econometrics by enabling inference on key economic variables, such as marginal rates of substitution, rather than focusing solely on predicting choices on new unlabeled data. However, while traditional DCMs offer high interpretability and support for point and interval estimation of economic quantities, these models often underperform in predictive tasks compared to deep learning (DL) models. Despite their predictive advantages, DL models remain largely underutilized in discrete choice due to concerns about their lack of interpretability, unstable parameter estimates, and the absence of established methods for uncertainty quantification. Here, we introduce a deep learning model architecture specifically designed to integrate with approximate Bayesian inference methods, such as Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). Our proposed model collapses to behaviorally informed hypotheses when data is limited, mitigating overfitting and instability in underspecified settings while retaining the flexibility to capture complex nonlinear relationships when sufficient data is available. We demonstrate our approach using SGLD through a Monte Carlo simulation study, evaluating both predictive metrics--such as out-of-sample balanced accuracy--and inferential metrics--such as empirical coverage for marginal rates of substitution interval estimates. Additionally, we present results from two empirical case studies: one using revealed mode choice data in NYC, and the other based on the widely used Swiss train choice stated preference data.

Daniel F. Villarraga, Ricardo A. Daziano

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, 220 Hollister Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Discrete Choice Models Bayesian Neural Networks Deep Learning Confidence Intervals Interpretability Choice

Date pendingcs.AI

VALG: An Agentic System for ML Theory Research

Machine learning theory studies learning procedures through mathematical setups in which the data model, training protocol, oracle access, loss, metric, and randomness define the phenomenon that a theorem is meant to explain. Solving an open problem therefore requires the problem formulation, theorem target, and proof mechanism to be developed in concert. Researchers formulate hypotheses, test them through preliminary theoretical or empirical analysis, and refine both assumptions and proofs. We investigate whether this process can be organized as an autonomous agentic workflow for ML theory research. We develop VALG, an agentic system that combines multi-level Verification, Adaptive formulation of Learning-theory problems, and Graph-structured proof development. Within each source-relative theorem branch, VALG maintains a fixed mathematical specification, checks the theorem-level composition of a typed proof-dependency graph, and constructs and reviews local proofs in dependency order. When a proof attempt fails, VALG identifies whether the obstruction lies in a derivation, the proof structure, or the theorem formulation and routes the next attempt accordingly. Formulation-level obstructions initiate an explicitly related variant or relaxation, preserving the mathematical relation between the resulting theorem and the source problem. We evaluate VALG on nine subproblems from five COLT 2026 open problems. Two runs produce internally finalized theorem candidates that match the scope of their source briefs; the remaining seven yield restricted-method results, special cases, or conditional theorems. These case studies show how VALG keeps source-scope matches, relaxations, conditional results, and blocked attempts mathematically distinct. VALG is open source at https://github.com/DechenZhang/VALG-ML-Theory-Agent.

Dechen Zhang, Xuan Tang, Xinxiang Yin +3

The University of Hong Kong · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute

Theorem Proving Choice