Physical Reasoning

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

7 papers in the last four weeks, up 75% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 40

Oct 6, 2026cs.CV

Do Vision Models Learn Physical Constraints or Rendering Shortcuts? A Counterfactual Benchmark for Grounded Physical Consistency

Modern image editing models can satisfy a text instruction while breaking the physics of the edited scene. A new object may cast no shadow, a mirror may fail to reflect visible geometry, or an object may float above a surface that should support it. We study physical plausibility diagnosis, detecting whether an edited image violates scene physics, naming the violation type, localizing the affected region, and explaining the failure in language. We introduce a counterfactual benchmark whose controlled synthetic component uses Mitsuba~3 to generate 5,500 images from 500 scene families. Each family contains one clean image and ten matched violations involving shadows, reflection, support, surface response, and occlusion. The renderer pipeline provides category labels, affected-region masks and boxes, scene metadata, and explanation targets. We use LLaVA-1.5-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B, and InternVL3.5-8B as diagnostic baselines rather than proposed methods. On a 1,650-image synthetic test set, the adapted baselines reach 64.0--67.8% category macro-F1 on standard held-out scenes. For LLaVA-1.5-7B, category macro-F1 falls from 64.0% on the standard split to 40.8% under intervention shift. This gap shows that high in-distribution accuracy partly reflects cues tied to rendering and counterfactual construction.

M. Moein Esfahani, Sepehr Salem, Mohammed Alser +1

Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA · Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Physical Reasoning Counterfactual Evaluation of VLMs Visual Reasoning Shortcut Learning

Sep 28, 2026cs.AI

MechReasoner: A Simulator and Benchmark for Mechanistic Reasoning in Qualitative Physics

This work introduces MechReasoner, a mechanistic qualitative simulator grounded in confluence-based qualitative physics, together with a benchmark for mechanistic inference. Current large language models (LLMs) generate fluent mechanistic descriptions that do not reliably follow from underlying structural and causal constraints. The benchmark tests whether answers preserve simulator-licensed ambiguity, quantified claims, episode-graph transition evidence, repairs, and trace-support judgments. Its 1,120 items are generated deterministically from admissible interpretation sets, component states, scenario restrictions, confluence constraints, and derivation steps across 18 catalog mechanisms and six task families. Each mechanism undergoes converter checks of structure and topology and behavioral checks against quantitative simulations. GPT-5.5 accuracy decreases as family-specific mechanistic complexity increases, from 76.1% in the lowest-complexity bucket (B1) to 38.0% in the highest-complexity bucket (B4). The negative association remains after controls for rendered-prompt and expected-answer length. These results show that qualitative simulators can support auditable NLP benchmarks for mechanistic inference.

Danilo Gusicuma, André Freitas

Idiap Research Institute, Switzerland · École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland

Physical Reasoning Scientific Reasoning in Language Models Physics-Based Simulation

Sep 28, 2026cs.AI

PhysFieldBench: Can Multimodal Models Understand Physical Fields?

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly envisioned as core components of scientific and engineering agents, yet their ability to interpret physical fields remains poorly understood. Existing physics benchmarks largely emphasize textbook problem solving or intuitive physical reasoning, leaving open whether MLLMs can infer physically meaningful information from continuous field observations. We introduce PhysFieldBench, a benchmark comprising 24 tasks and 1,160 evaluation examples across controlled equation fields, simulated physical fields, and observed physical fields. The tasks assess three forms of inference: identifying physical mechanisms, comparing latent control variables, and predicting outcome properties. Across representative open-source and proprietary MLLMs, zero-shot performance is low: the best model achieves a chance-normalized score of 29.3, while several open-source models remain near chance. In contrast, a task-specific supervised vision transformer performs substantially better, demonstrating that the inputs contain learnable physical information. To diagnose these failures, a structured self-explanation analysis attributes most errors to missed visual patterns and incorrect visual-to-physical mappings. Further, to explore whether post-training can improve physical inference and generalize to unseen tasks, we compare supervised fine-tuning with final answers or chain-of-thought supervision and reinforcement learning. Final-answer supervision performs best overall but transfers less effectively, whereas reinforcement learning after chain-of-thought supervision achieves the best generalization. Together, these findings highlight the need to improve visual-to-physical grounding and cross-task generalization for MLLMs to reliably interpret physical fields in scientific and engineering workflows.

Yuezhou Ma, Huikun Weng, Jialong Wu +5

School of Software, BNRist, Tsinghua University, China

Physical Reasoning Multimodal Large Language Models Scientific Reasoning in Language Models Multimodal Model Evaluation

Sep 22, 2026cs.AI

OmniFysics-Nano-V2 Technical Report: Understanding the Physical World Across Modalities

Omni-modal models have expanded multimodal interaction across vision, audio, speech, and language. However, their training is predominantly organized around semantic descriptions and general-purpose objectives, leaving physical attributes, interaction states, and causal mechanisms only partially specified. This gap is not simply a matter of modality coverage: adding more modalities does not by itself provide the supervision needed to connect observations with the physical structure of the world. We present OmniFysics-Nano-V2, a compact omni-modal model for physical-world perception and understanding. The model supports image, video, audio, speech, and text inputs within a shared reasoning framework, together with text and speech generation. To address the lack of explicit physical supervision, we construct a dual-branch physics-aware data pipeline that grounds salient objects in structured physical attributes and aligns visual changes with acoustic events, intermediate responses, and interaction outcomes. To address homogeneous training objectives, we curate reinforcement-learning prompts by reward diversity and adopt a two-stage Group Relative Policy Optimization curriculum that progresses from general task correctness to fine-grained physical perceptual reasoning. Experiments across multimodal, audio-visual, and physical reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed data and training strategy improves physical-world understanding while preserving broad omni-modal competence. The proposed model achieves leading result on 17 of 21 benchmarks against SOTA omni-modal models. By equipping AI systems with both omni-modal and physical-world perception capabilities, OmniFysics-Nano-V2 is poised to become a cornerstone of next-generation Physical AI.

Yizhou Liu, Jinghang Han, Kaixiang Qiu +8

Physical Superintelligence Lab, Fysics AI · College of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University

Multimodal Grounding Physical Reasoning Multimodal Foundation Models

Sep 17, 2026cs.CV

SnapPhysics: A Physics-Aware Scene Graph from a Single View for Interactive Mixed Reality Scenes

We propose SnapPhysics, a training-free framework that reconstructs 3D objects and estimates their physical properties such as mass, friction, and center of gravity from a single image. For physically coherent interactions in mixed reality (MR), such properties are as important as geometry. Prior approaches infer them by analyzing object dynamics in video, which is computationally costly, or by querying vision-language models (VLMs) on single images, which lacks geometric grounding and inter-object relationships. We address these limitations by combining instance-level 3D reconstruction and spatial alignment with a physics-aware scene graph that encodes these relationships and per-object metric geometry as structured context for VLM-based property reasoning. Experiments on 3D-FRONT show that SnapPhysics improves scene-level F-Score by 18.6% over the best learning-based method, and on real captured scenes with ground-truth mass, it reduces the mean absolute log difference error (mALDE) by up to 20.5% and improves log-scale correlation (

r^2_{\mathrm{ls}}

) by up to 19.6% over VLM-only estimation. SnapPhysics enables physically interactive MR experiences without manual parameter tuning. Project page: https://snapphysics-ismar2026.github.io/.

Suji Kang, Seok-Young Kim, Young Bin Kim +4

KAIST UVR Lab · VISUS, University of Stuttgart · KAIST UVR Lab KAIST KI-ITC ARRC

Physical Reasoning 3D SGG

Sep 14, 2026cs.AI

How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks

Low reported scores on leading physics benchmarks, including those featured in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026), suggest that frontier language models still struggle with advanced physics, a demanding test of their scientific reasoning and quantitative problem-solving abilities. Yet this impression does not always align with domain experts' experiences using these models in their work. We revisit these reported findings by evaluating frontier models on six widely used physics benchmarks and auditing them with experts, focusing on text-only problems with verifiable final answers. For each subfield of physics, faculty and graduate researchers with relevant expertise carefully review problem statements, reference solutions, and model responses to distinguish genuine model errors from grader errors, incorrect reference solutions, and ambiguous or underspecified questions. Most audited cases initially evaluated as incorrect reflect these benchmarking issues rather than errors in the models' physics reasoning. We then ask experts to address these benchmarking issues by correcting erroneous reference solutions and repairing or excluding flawed questions. We find that GPT-5.6-Sol's measured mean@4 rises from 47.3% to 78.7% on HLE-Physics and from 61.0% to 87.2% on CMT-Benchmark, while its corrected pass@4 reaches 94.4% on the 54 retained CritPt challenges. Corrected scores are computed on the retained evaluation subsets following expert review. Scores on the audited subsets of UGPhysics, PRISM-Physics, and PHYBench also rise substantially after correction. These findings suggest that current benchmarks substantially understate frontier models' ability to solve well-posed physics problems. Near-saturation on these closed-ended tasks highlights the need for more demanding, expert-validated evaluations.

Ali Ansari, Haoran Sun, Andy Zeyi Liu +48

LLM Evaluation Physical Reasoning Benchmark Validity

Sep 12, 2026cs.RO

ReactHuman: A Physics-Grounded Benchmark for Human-Like Reactive Decision-Making in Embodied Multimodal LLMs

Reacting to sudden physical hazards (catching a slipping plate, dodging a falling knife) is both a meaningful test of embodied intelligence and a hard requirement for deploying multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as the decision coreof household robots. Existing evaluations, however, probe intuitive physics passively through question answering over videos, or target deliberate, long-horizon tasks such as navigation and rearrangement; none measure whether a model can turn physical understanding into immediate, safety-critical action. We introduce ReactHuman, the first physics-grounded benchmark for human-like reactive decision-making, in which the evaluated MLLM acts as the brain of a simulated humanoid facing sudden household hazards; it spans 17 event families and over 1,000 bit-for-bit reproducible scenes with exact, annotation-free ground truth derived from 240 Hz rigid-body simulation, including adversarial objects whose appearance contradicts their physics (a foam anvil, a steel apple). We further design a five-metric suite that scores each reaction along three axes: reasonable, safe, and physically grounded. We physically execute every committed plan so that decisions have observable consequences. With this harness we evaluate seven representative MLLMs. Results show that reactive safety is far from solved: models mishandle roughly one hazard in three, act from fixed dispositions rather than the observed scene, trust appearance over motion, and miss interception points at meter scale even when the chosen action is correct; none of these failures shrink with model scale. ReactHuman thus offers both a fine-grained diagnosis and a scalable training signal toward physically grounded, safety-aware embodied agents. The benchmark can be found here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Alan123/reacthuman-benchmark-scaled

Yizhan Li, Jianxin You, Mengyang Xiong +5

Université de Montréal · Mila – Quebec AI Institute · McGill University +2

Physical Reasoning Robotics Simulation Robot Safety AI Agent Safety Benchmarks Multimodal Agents Embodied AI+1

Sep 8, 2026cs.RO

CALIPER: Clean Scenes Cannot Rank Physical Inference in Pretrained Visual Representations

How far a pushed object slides depends on its mass and friction, which no single image reveals. Pretrained visual encoders are increasingly used as the perception front end of world models for manipulation, and their physical competence is assessed with perturbation benchmarks and linear probes, almost always in a clean, fixed-camera scene. We show that these assessments cannot distinguish an encoder that infers physics from one that does not. CALIPER (calibrate, then predict) is a direct test: an object of unknown mass and friction is struck twice at known speeds, a third strike is shown only up to the moment of contact, and a linear readout on frozen features must predict how far the object slides. Swapping in another object's calibration clips checks that the evidence is actually used. Across 2,000 simulated episodes and eight representations, from V-JEPA 2 to a randomly initialised ViT and raw pixels, calibration adds +0.50 R^2 and the swap removes it. Yet in the clean scene every representation lands within 0.02 R^2 of the ceiling set by true simulator state, because a fixed camera exposes the object's displacement directly in pixel coordinates. Resampling camera, lighting, and clutter for every clip spreads the same representations across 0.50 R^2; when the readout chooses a push speed for a goal distance, V-JEPA 2 misses by 4 mm and the random ViT by 20 mm, no better than ignoring the object. Linear probes track none of this: a change in frame aggregation moves a probe more than pretraining does, and erasing the probed mass direction from the same representation costs nothing in one scene and 0.35 R^2 in the other. Whether a benchmark can rank models is an empirical property, and we give three checks that establish it.

Aman Mehta, Riya Baviskar

Independent Researcher

Physical Reasoning Visual Representation Learning World Model Evaluation

Sep 2, 2026cs.LG

Do Tabular Foundation Models Know Physics? Contamination, Units, and the Deterministic Limit

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) learn to fill in tables the way language models fill in text, and tables are arguably the format in which most physical measurement arrives. Did they learn any physics in the process? They are Bayesian by construction, so the question is what their prior contains. We probe it directly, evaluating four of them (TabPFN-3, TabICLv2, TabDPT and Real-TabPFN-2.5) against six baselines on datasets sampled from 316 physical equations, in and out of domain. TFMs dominate, out of the box and after tuning. But we show that their prior can represent neither a noiseless mechanism nor physical units, which is why they interpolate physics without yet being able to act as physical models.

Wassim Tenachi, Yashar Hezaveh, Laurence Perreault Levasseur +1

Département de physique, Université de Montréal · Mila – Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute · Department of Computer Science and Operations Research, Université de Montréal[cs.LG]

Tabular Foundation Models Physical Reasoning Tabular Regression

Sep 1, 2026cs.CV

Teaching Vision-Language Models to Use the Scale They Are Given: Label-Free Equivariance Training for Metric Physical Reasoning

Metric questions about video, such as the speed of a moving object, require a vision-language model to convert visual measurements into physical units using a real-world reference supplied in the prompt. We find that current models use this reference only partially. When every world-space quantity in the prompt is multiplied by a common factor, the prompt still describes the same video and the correct answer changes by exactly that factor, but the predictions of eight models change by less, and their accuracy stays concentrated near the scale that the depicted objects usually have. Asked the same physics in a scale-free form, the two models we test recover the closed-form scaling laws on most items, which indicates that the deficit lies in metric grounding and not in knowledge of the physical mechanism. Because the scaling relation is exact, it can serve as supervision without metric annotations. Equivariance Self-Distillation (EquiSD) projects a model's own prediction onto the functions that satisfy this relation and fine-tunes the model on the resulting targets, with one query per training question and no ground truth. Trained on synthetic video only, EquiSD brings a 3B model close to the exact relation on held-out simulated videos, also at scales not seen in training, and improves its accuracy across scales. Without adaptation, it also improves accuracy across scales on the QuantiPhy benchmark, where its gain reaches 93% of that obtained by supervision with exact simulator answers.

Kaizhen Tan, Yang Feng, Heqing Du +3

New York University · Columbia University · Carnegie Mellon University

Physical Reasoning VLM Adaptation VLM Reasoning Self-Distillation

Aug 21, 2026cs.RO

PhysCaP: Grounding Code-as-Policy Agent with Physics-Informed Exploration

We present PhysCaP, a Physics-Informed Code-as-Policy agent system for active perception in robotic manipulation. While vision-language-action policies excel at imitating demonstrations, they rely on passive observation and fail to infer latent physical properties critical for manipulation. PhysCaP augments code-as-policy frameworks with a physics-informed exploration layer that enables explicit information-seeking through interaction. Our method introduces training-free physical property extraction modules that estimate object mass and stiffness from robot proprioception without additional sensors. To balance exploration costs and the efficiency of information obtained, PhysCaP employs a multi-agent design: a Planner that decides when to explore and when to stop, and a Prioritizer that filters implausible interactions and ranks the remainder using a heuristic priority score, enabling efficient, targeted exploration. We evaluate PhysCaP on three real-world tabletop manipulation tasks and a simulated task in LIBERO. The results show that existing passive and naive interactive baselines either fail when physical properties are hidden or over-explore, whereas PhysCaP achieves comparable performance with fewer interactions and reduced execution time. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of the proposed physical property extraction modules. Project page: https://physcap.github.io

Chen-Yu Lin, Jing-Wen Chen, Hsueh-En Chang +8

National Taiwan University · NVIDIA Research · National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Physical Reasoning Active Vision for Robot Manipulation Robotic Manipulation

Aug 10, 2026cs.CV

Learning How the World Evolves: Extrapolative Video World Models via Latent Dynamics Reasoning

The world evolves following its dynamics, i.e., its laws of motion. However, leading video diffusion models largely fit the pixels without modeling how the pixels transit over time. Thus, they render visually plausible frames but may not accurately obey the laws. To capture the dynamics purely from pixels, we introduce Latent Dynamics Reasoning (LDR). LDR casts the latent transition as an explicit kinematic integration, where the lower-order dynamics are integrated numerically and the model regresses only the third- and higher-order residual that drives the rollout. For this integration to extrapolate better, LDR runs it on a structured latent rather than dense convolutional features. Following PhyWorld, we validate LDR on a controlled white-box physics benchmark spanning five tasks (uniform motion, parabola, collision, bouncing, looming), focusing on out-of-distribution scenarios that reveal whether a model has truly learned the underlying dynamics. LDR extrapolates the learned dynamics far better: the gap between its in- and out-of-distribution error is over 20

\times

smaller than the video diffusion baseline's, under both single- and joint-task training at 256

^2

resolution, while using 26

\times

fewer parameters and running 143

\times

faster. LDR can even generalize under severe shift: for example, trained only on red balls moving left-to-right, it correctly predicts the motion of a blue square moving right-to-left. To our knowledge, this is the first video world model that extrapolates learned dynamics beyond its training distribution. Project page: https://lat-dyn-reason.github.io/

Haodong Li, Shaoteng Liu, Tianyu Wang +7

1UCSD 2Adobe

Physical Consistency in Video Generation Physical Reasoning Latent Dynamics Modeling OOD Generalization Video World Models

Aug 8, 2026cs.RO

PhysX-CoT: Structured Physical Reasoning from a Single Image to Simulation-Ready 3D Assets

Simulation-ready 3D assets are central to robotics and embodied AI. Generating them from a single image is usually framed as a vision-language model that emits a serialized asset for a decoder to turn into geometry and physical fields, leaving the image-to-3D reasoning implicit. We argue the limiting factor is this output-centric view: part placement and local shape are entangled in one global-coordinate token stream, and the intermediate physical states are never exposed for supervision, conditioning, or verification. PhysX-CoT instead casts single-image asset generation as an explicit structured physical reasoning process, an ordered and machine-parseable trajectory of part-level states covering decomposition, 2D and 3D grounding, relations, coarse geometry, and surface cues that we separately supervise, use to condition geometry, and treat as reward targets. Geometry is factorized so that 3D boxes carry placement and local codes carry shape, and CoT-aligned GRPO optimizes parse validity, grounding, geometry, placement, and physical consistency. Under a unified protocol that retrains all learned baselines on the same backbone, data, and frozen decoder, PhysX-CoT outperforms the closest full-task baseline across geometry, scale, and physical-attribute metrics. Oracle, token-matched, and state-order controls show the explicit states are functional rather than cosmetic, and in Unreal Engine~5 the generated assets parse, collide, and articulate at high validity.

Jie Huang, Xiaohe Li, Jiahao Li +6

the Key Laboratory of Target Cognition and Application Technology Aerospace Information Research Institute Chinese Academy of Sciences · School of Artificial Intelligence Shanghai Jiaotong University · Space Engineering University

Part-Level 3D Generation Physical Reasoning 3D Asset Generation CoT Reasoning

Aug 7, 2026cs.RO

Is Forward Prediction Enough? Physical State Grounding for JEPA World Models

Learning structured and control-relevant latent representations remains a key challenge for world models. Recent JEPA-based world models learn action-conditioned predictive latent dynamics from observation sequences. However, their forward-prediction objectives do not explicitly enforce reliable identifiability of robot-centric physical state from individual latents or state changes from latent pairs, which can limit downstream planning and policy performance. We propose PSG-JEPA, a physically grounded JEPA world model that shapes its latent space with two complementary grounding objectives beyond forward prediction: grounding individual latents in robot proprioceptive state, and grounding latent pairs in multi-horizon joint-angle changes. Both objectives are applied only during training, leaving the inference architecture and computational cost unchanged. To comprehensively evaluate PSG-JEPA, we conduct experiments at three levels: (1) latent identifiability via probing, (2) goal-conditioned planning on frozen latents, and (3) policy learning in simulation and on a real robot. Experiments demonstrate that our PSG-JEPA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art latent world-model baselines at all three levels.

Haodong Yan, Jiaguan Zhu, Mingyuan Jia +12

1The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China · 2COCO Matrix

Physical Reasoning World Models for Robotics World Model-Based Planning Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture Action-Conditioned World Models State Representation Learning

Jul 15, 2026cs.CV

UniPhysGen: Unified Physical Grounding for Simulation-Ready 3D Assets

Physically grounded 3D assets are increasingly important for embodied AI and robotic simulation. However, most existing 3D assets lack unified physical semantics, including articulation semantics and intrinsic physical properties, required for realistic interaction. Current approaches either treat these semantics independently or rely on canonicalized object structures, limiting robustness across heterogeneous 3D assets. We present UniPhys, a scalable framework for automatically transforming raw 3D assets into simulation-ready assets with unified physical semantics. Based on UniPhys, we construct UniPhys-40K, a large-scale physically grounded dataset, together with UniPhys-Bench, a carefully verified benchmark for unified physical grounding evaluation. We further introduce UniPhysGen, a unified physical grounding model that jointly reasons over articulation semantics and intrinsic physical properties. UniPhysGen incorporates geometry-robust articulation grounding to mitigate geometric shortcut bias under heterogeneous part decompositions. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across articulation grounding and intrinsic physical property estimation tasks, while the resulting assets can be directly deployed in robotic simulation environments for realistic physical interaction. Our code and dataset will be available at https://github.com/breezexian/UniPhysGen.

Xian Li, Rong Wei, Lujie Yang +6

Zhejiang University · Manycore Tech Inc. · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Physical Reasoning Robotics Simulation

Jul 14, 2026cs.CV

UniVR: Thinking in Visual Space for Unified Visual Reasoning

Learning broad world knowledge directly from raw visual data is a fundamental capability of intelligence. We introduce UniVR, the first investigation into simultaneously learning complex reasoning, fine-grained physical dynamics, and long-term planning from pure visual demonstrations. At its core, UniVR features VR-GRPO, a reinforcement learning paradigm with complementary global and step-level rewards. This approach enforces logical coherence and physical consistency throughout the reasoning process without requiring task-specific heuristics or image-text pairs. To train and evaluate UniVR, we construct VR-X, a large-scale benchmark curated from 16 diverse sources spanning long-horizon manipulation, spatial puzzles, and physical reasoning. It is the first comprehensive suite to assess these heterogeneous capabilities under a purely visual protocol. Remarkably, UniVR achieves up to a 25% improvement on VR-X, and its superior visual reasoning also boosts performance on various multimodal understanding benchmarks. These findings underscore the vast potential of reasoning within visual spaces, with all code, data, and models are open-sourced for further research.

Zhongwei Ren, Yunchao Wei, Yao Zhao +5

Beijing Jiaotong University · ByteDance

Physical Reasoning Visual Spatial Reasoning Long-Horizon Planning Visually Grounded Reasoning Visual RL

Jul 11, 2026cs.LG

PhysMRV: Physical Memory Retrieval and Verification for Physics Plausibility Reasoning

Video-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on video understanding and visual question answering, yet they remain unreliable in reasoning about physical plausibility, where understanding object interactions, causal dynamics, and fundamental physical principles is essential. This limitation is particularly evident on challenging physical reasoning benchmarks, revealing a persistent gap in physical commonsense reasoning. To address this challenge, we propose PhysMRV, a training-free physical memory and verification framework for physical plausibility reasoning. Unlike retrieval-augmented VLMs that retrieve semantically similar videos as additional context, PhysMRV transforms training videos into a Hierarchical Memory Bank of structured physical knowledge comprising three complementary levels: scene descriptions capturing visual context, physical-event graphs modeling object interactions and causal structure, and physics-rule summaries distilling reusable physical principles and cues. During inference, PhysMRV retrieves physically relevant memories and leverages their structured physical evidence to guide a frozen VLM in verifying physical plausibility, requiring neither fine-tuning nor parameter updates. We evaluate PhysMRV on three challenging physical reasoning benchmarks, ImplausiBench, IntPhys2, and GRASP Level 2, across multiple state-of-the-art VLMs. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements over direct prompting across diverse VLMs and evaluation benchmarks, showing that structured physical memories provide an effective and scalable means of enhancing physical plausibility reasoning without additional training.

Wenyuan Wang, Lianyu Hu, Hao Wang +1

1Nanyang Technological University · 2Rutgers University · University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Memory-Augmented VLMs Physical Reasoning VLM Reasoning Physical Reasoning in Video

Jul 8, 2026cs.CV

Geometric Collapse: When Vision Models Fail to Verify Physical Causality

Recent progress in large-scale self-supervised learning has improved dense geometric prediction, but it remains unclear whether such scaling yields inference-time physical plausibility checks. We propose Scrambled Edges, a controlled counterfactual that injects salient edge-like cues while violating surface continuity, illumination coherence, and occlusion ordering. With energy-matched and structure-matched controls, we isolate the effect of unsupported edge evidence from high-frequency energy and edge sparsity. Across CNN/ViT/SSL depth predictors on NYU Depth v2 and KITTI, Scrambled Edges induce up to 3.2x larger deviation from clean predictions than energy-matched noise; additional diffusion and flow-matching depth estimators show attenuated but still significant collapse. The resulting Geometric Collapse propagates globally: even with oracle knowledge of the corrupted region, output-level repair recovers only 47%, with substantial error outside the mask. These findings provide controlled behavioral evidence that current dense predictors lack reliable mechanisms to quarantine physically unsupported edge cues, motivating explicit plausibility scoring and selective cue integration.

Wentao Zhang, Jinhu Qi, Weiqiang Jin +3

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao SAR, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China · AgentecFusion Limited +2

Physical Reasoning Depth Estimation Monocular Depth Estimation

Jul 7, 2026cs.AI

Bridging Physical Reasoning and Task Generalization via Visual Action Outcome Reasoning Alignment

Vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to generalize in interactive physical reasoning, particularly under unseen tasks and environments. Two key failure modes are prominent: hallucinated chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning that contradicts physical reality, and misalignment between the model's reasoning and actions. We present VAORA (Visual Action Outcome Reasoning Alignment), a novel reward design that directly addresses both issues. VAORA introduces two complementary rewards: Visual Alignment Reward, which anchors VLM reasoning to the visual context independent of the agent action itself, and Visual-Action Alignment Reward, which grounds reasoning in the visual outcome induced by the model's action. Together, these rewards suppress hallucinated CoT and reduce the gap between reasoning and behavior. To improve training stability, we further employ smooth, dense rewards by estimating success probabilities using a pre-trained in-domain expert agent. Experiments on PHYRE and Virtual Tool support our performances across novel-task and unseen-environment settings, confirming that grounded and generalizable physical intelligence can be induced through VAORA.

Han-Jun Ko, Jr-Jen Chen, Haobo Yuan +4

National Taiwan University · The University of California, Merced

Physical Reasoning VLM Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning RL for VLMs Embodied Reasoning

Jul 6, 2026cs.AI

Reason, Reward, Refine: Step-Level Errors Corrections with Structured Feedback for Physics Reasoning in Small Language Models

Physics reasoning fails structurally in small language models: an error at any step propagates forward, corrupting every inference that follows. Limited domain knowledge, hallucination under multi-step derivation, and distributional sensitivity compound this failure. We propose a step-level reward framework that identifies the first reasoning error, generates targeted structured feedback, and trains the model to revise its solution via policy gradient with KL regularization, without exposing it to ground truth solutions as generation targets. Unlike annotation-dependent step-level methods, no preference data construction is required and the external verifier operates exclusively at training time. Across five physics benchmarks, our framework delivers accuracy gains of 17-20% over CoT prompting and 10-16% over the strongest baseline, reduces calculation errors from 56.9% to 23.5%, and reduces miscomprehension errors from 22.3% to 12.0% in the best observed cases. Conceptual errors reduce from 89.7% to 68.7%, yet persist as the hardest failure mode across all conditions.

Raj Jaiswal, Dhruv Jain, Rishabh Dhawan +4

IIIT Delhi · IIT BHU · NII Tokyo +2

LLM Self-Correction Physical Reasoning RL for Language Model Reasoning Small Language Models

Jun 30, 2026cs.LG

Testing Frontier Large Language Models' Physics Literacy in Parallel Physical Worlds

Current large-language-model (LLM) physics benchmarks are usually scored by answer accuracy, which cannot distinguish genuine reasoning from recall of familiar problem patterns and reveals little about where a model's reasoning breaks down. We introduce an auditable four-stage diagnostic that evaluates whether an LLM can reason inside an unfamiliar physics framework through induction, formulation, prediction, and review. The diagnostic combines locked pre-registrations, fresh sessions between stages, dual-LLM judging, and a human-audit pathway, and we apply it to three parallel physics worlds: a single-equation counterfactual world (

F=mv

), a historical framework (Aristotelian mechanics), and a four-domain counterfactual world (Decay World). Across Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro, the three worlds yield composite PASS rates are 6/15, 6/15, and 0/15 respectively (content

\land

structural for

F=mv

and Aristotelian, content axis only for Decay World where the structural axis is out of scope). The most pointed empirical pattern is a qualitative-versus-quantitative asymmetry: in Decay World, models almost never predict the wrong direction of change, but frequently compute the wrong ratio by slipping back to standard-physics relations. The protocol also surfaces two methodology findings: LLM-judge reliability does not transfer across frameworks, and Stage 4 self-review is weak in every framework, with the model's own review wrongly reporting no earlier error in at least two-thirds of the trials that actually contained one. We release the full prompts, responses, verdicts, and audit records.

Dong Zhang

LLM Evaluation Physical Reasoning Counterfactual Reasoning in Language Models Language Model Self-Assessment Counterfactual Reasoning

Jun 28, 2026cs.RO

Position: Vision-Language-Action Models Cannot Be Verified to Perform Physical Reasoning

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) systems, built on pretrained vision-language models (VLMs), have shown rapidly improving performance on robot manipulation benchmarks. These gains are commonly interpreted as evidence that semantic representations learned from internet-scale data transfer to physical execution generalization. This position paper argues that the assumption underlying this interpretation -- that semantic generalization is sufficient to support physical action decisions -- has not been independently verified and cannot be tested under current evaluation protocols. We support this claim by decomposing VLA policies into semantic mapping and physical action decision, and showing that task success rate -- the dominant evaluation metric -- cannot distinguish between these two sources of capability. As a result, improvements in benchmark performance are consistent with multiple competing explanations, including semantic matching, distributional overlap, and genuine physical generalization. We further argue that this identifiability gap has been reinforced through narrative drift, whereby successive systems inherit and strengthen prior interpretations of performance gains without isolating the underlying causal mechanism. To address this limitation, we propose a research direction based on evaluation designs that introduce controlled variation to separately measure semantic and physical generalization. Such designs make it possible to causally attribute performance without requiring access to model internals, and to empirically assess the role of VLM backbones as semantic interfaces rather than implicit sources of physical competence. Our goal is not to refute the role of VLMs in robotics, but to clarify the conditions under which claims of physical generalization can be meaningfully evaluated.

Taozhao Chen, Ian Manchester, Huaming Chen

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia · School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia

VLM Evaluation Physical Reasoning Generalization in Robotic Manipulation Robotics Vision-Language-Action Models Robot Manipulation Benchmarks+1

Jun 6, 2026cs.CV

ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?

Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in open-world reasoning and understanding. However, a critical ambiguity persists: it remains unclear whether these models genuinely synthesize cross-modal information to construct physically grounded reasoning chains, or if they merely exploit strong language priors to mask single-modality reliance, thereby hallucinating advanced multimodal capabilities. Motivated by this, and to rigorously mitigate language modality bias and shortcuts, we propose a novel multimodal Chrono}logical Physical Dynamics Reasoning Benchmark ChronoPhyBench, which unifies next state prediction with Visual Question Answering (VQA) paradigms by conditioning on historical video context and textual captions to enforce models to deduce subsequent physical states through both single image selection and the inherently more complex task of multiple frame chronological sorting. Concurrently, we construct a large-scale multimodal reasoning dataset curated using the ChronoPhyBench criteria, comprising over 10,000 long-form videos paired with meticulously annotated captions, totaling 5M tokens. Our experimental evaluations reveal a stark contrast to conclusions drawn by previous benchmarks. The capacity of current open-source models to perform physically grounded multimodal reasoning remains in its infancy. Ultimately, this work seeks to systematically stress-test the reasoning capabilities of multimodal models, quantify hallucination rates, and advance the development of Physical AI, thereby providing the community with a robust and transparent evaluation framework toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Bin Zhu, Yanhao Jia, Kexin Zhao +12

Peking University, Shenzhen Graduate School · 2Peng Cheng Laboratory · Rabbitpre Intelligence +3

Physical Reasoning Multimodal QA Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Hallucination Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Jun 1, 2026cs.AI

Planning Takes More Than Token Prediction: Causal Plan for Benchmarking and Building Physically Grounded Embodied Reasoners

Current benchmarks for embodied vision-language planning inadvertently favor linguistic next-token prediction over physically grounded next-state reasoning. This rewards models that mimic statistical language priors rather than track true causal dependencies, reducing complex physical planning to shallow sequence modeling. Hence, achieving genuine physical autonomy requires a fundamental shift from linguistically grounded token prediction toward physically grounded causal reasoning. To this end, we introduce Causal-Plan-Bench, a high-fidelity diagnostic suite spanning four causal dimensions, curated via multi-stage verification. To endow models with this capability, a four-stage annotation pipeline extracts structured interaction records from egocentric videos to construct Causal-Plan-1M, a dense million-scale corpus of explicit causal reasoning traces. Extensive evaluation reveals a striking gap: leading models struggle to demonstrate genuine physical agency -- even GPT-6-astra scores only 43.04. In contrast, our tailored training recipe enables Causal Planner to internalize the complex physical logic required for accurate next-state estimation. Built upon Qwen3-VL-8B, Causal Planner raises its backbone's score from 33.23 to 45.28, a 36.3% relative gain, and improves on three external benchmarks without benchmark-specific adaptation. We further observe an empirical Causal-Supervision Scaling Trend. Paired no-vision controls also reveal substantial visual dependence, while cross-judge comparisons and human scoring assess the reliability of automated evaluation. More importantly, we initiate the first effort to turn agents from superficial token predictors into physically grounded causal reasoners, bridging language modeling and world modeling.

Zheng Lu, Mingqi Gao, Qinlei Xie +7

Tsinghua University · Microsoft Research Asia · MBZUAI

Physical Reasoning AI Agent Benchmarks VLMs for Robotics Embodied World Models Embodied Reasoning

May 30, 2026cs.CV

Physical Object Understanding with a Physically Controllable World Model

A central challenge in visual intelligence is learning the physical structure of scenes from raw videos: how regions form objects and the laws that govern their interactions. Solving these tasks requires world models capable of inferring distributional states of the world from partial observations - capabilities that current architectures do not provide. We introduce a new class of probabilistic world models that support estimation of the probability of any visual variable, such as appearance and dynamics, conditioned on any other variables. Here, we identify that these models can be trained efficiently with autoregressive sequence modeling, yielding world models from which rich object understanding emerges. First, we demonstrate that our model captures the physical laws governing how objects move by generating multiple plausible future states of the world through sequential inference. Then, by analyzing motion correlations across these futures, we extract objects and articulated object subparts. Having discovered these objects, we show that our world model can manipulate them in 3D. Finally, we demonstrate how physical relationships between objects can be computed from the world model, enabling applications such as Visual Jenga.

Rahul Venkatesh, Klemen Kotar, Lilian Naing Chen +9

Stanford University · OpenAI · Noetik Inc. +1

Physical Reasoning World Model Learning Object-Centric Representation Learning Video World Models 3D Scene Understanding

May 29, 2026cs.LG

Sample-Efficient Post-Training for LEGO Spatial-Physics Reasoning

LLM-based LEGO assembly generation requires both semantic grounding and physical feasibility. We identify a data-induced failure mode, PhysHack, in which the assemblies satisfy physical-validity constraints while producing structures that are geometrically misaligned, semantically inconsistent, or poorly calibrated. To address this challenge, we propose a model-based data selection approach that uses only a small fraction of the training data while improving physically grounded LEGO assembly generation. Building on the selected trajectories, we introduce PVPO, a sample-efficient reinforcement learning method that couples physical feasibility with voxel-space geometric rewards. Our results show that physical validity alone is an insufficient proxy for reliable physical reasoning: models can learn to generate valid structures without preserving semantic or geometric fidelity. Experiments across model backbones and test-time scaling settings demonstrate that PVPO improves structural and semantic alignment, physical validity, structural stability, and calibration, while reducing reliance on extensive post-hoc rejection sampling. In particular, results on calibration show that PVPO mitigates PhysHack by making test-time selection more predictive of semantic and structural quality.

Yuhuan Yuan, Zhouliang Yu, Minghao Liu +2

HKUST(GZ) · CUHK · ZODA

Physical Reasoning Visual Spatial Reasoning RL for Language Model Reasoning Data Selection Training Data Selection Sample-Efficient RL

May 29, 2026cs.AI

BilliardPhys-Bench: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning and Visual Dynamics of Multimodal LLMs

Current multimodal models handle static image recognition well, but intuitive physical reasoning remains a weakness. Predicting how objects will move and interact from a single image is still difficult for these systems. We present BilliardPhys-Bench, a benchmark for physical reasoning in synthetic billiards environments. Its procedural engine generates randomized scenarios with friction and elastic collisions. The benchmark tests three abilities: (1) predicting ball-to-ball collisions, (2) reasoning about wall bounces, and (3) estimating final ball positions after motion stops. We evaluate recent MLLMs from the GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Qwen families. Performance drops as simulation time increases and scene geometry grows more complex. We also observe a consistent failure mode we call "stasis bias": when the correct physical outcome is harder to infer, models tend to predict no interaction. These findings show where current MLLMs break down on visual dynamics and point toward the need for better physical inductive biases in multimodal architectures.

Ben Wang, Xiaogang Li, Ruochen Gao +6

Alibaba Group Beijing, China

Physical Reasoning Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

May 28, 2026cs.AI

PhyDrawGen: Physically Grounded Diagram Generation from Natural Language

Generating physics diagrams from text requires strict adherence to physical laws. While current generative models produce visually plausible outputs, they systematically hallucinate force vectors, ignore conservation laws, and violate geometric constraints. We present PhyDrawGen, a neuro-symbolic pipeline that decouples semantic scene understanding from physical constraint satisfaction. First, a large language model extracts a typed scene graph from the problem text. A deterministic solver then converts this graph into a Planar Straight-Line Graph (PSLG), encoding force balance, optical paths, and field topologies as exact geometric primitives. Finally, a fine-tuned Qwen-VL model implements a visually grounded propose-verify loop to iteratively correct any constraint violations. Evaluated on a benchmark of 1,449 problems spanning mechanics, optics, and electromagnetism, PhyDrawGen significantly outperforms GPT-5-image, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Gemini 3 Pro, demonstrating robust physical accuracy even on unusual-object problems.

Nafiul Haque, Syed Nazmus Sakib, Shifat E Arman

Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Dhaka

Physical Reasoning T2I Generation Neuro-Symbolic AI

May 25, 2026cs.RO

PhyPush: One Push is All You Need for Sensorless Physical Property Estimation with Physics-Guided Transformers

Accurately estimating object mass and friction is fundamental to reliable robotic manipulation. While interactive perception is powerful, most approaches rely on specialized hardware like force/torque sensors, limiting scalability. This paper introduces PhyPush, a physics-guided Transformer that estimates an object's mass and friction coefficient using only end-effector velocity from a single push, data readily available on standard robotic arms. By incorporating Newton's second law and the Coulomb friction model through a physics-guided loss, the model improves physical consistency and generalizes to unseen objects and surfaces. Across diverse setups, PhyPush consistently achieves highly accurate estimations in challenging out-of-domain conditions. In simulation, it reduces error by over 10% compared to a baseline with privileged force data, while in real-world experiments, it successfully zero-shot transfers from simulation to outperform a purely data-driven baseline.

Koyo Fujii, Luis Figueredo, Praminda Caleb-Solly +4

School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom · Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Physical Reasoning Robotic Manipulation System Identification Physics-Informed ML

May 25, 2026stat.ML

DiscoverPhysics: Benchmarking LLMs for Out-of-the-Box Scientific Thinking

Frontier LLMs now perform strongly across a wide range of physics evaluations, but it is hard to disentangle genuine reasoning from recall of established science. We introduce DiscoverPhysics, an interactive benchmark that asks a LLM agent to discover the laws of motion of a simulated world whose physics deliberately deviates from our own. We construct 22 worlds governed by, among others, screened and fractional-power gravity, multi-species couplings, hidden dark-matter-like particles, non-coordinate-free physics, and time-varying interactions. Each world is generated on demand by an N-body simulator, for which the agent proposes several rounds of experiments, observes raw trajectory data, and ultimately submits both a natural-language explanation of the world's physics and a Python implementation of the inferred law. Because solving a world requires the agent to design informative experiments and revise its hypotheses, the benchmark probes long-horizon reasoning over an experimental history. We evaluate submissions along two complementary axes: trajectory MSE on held-out particles and an LLM-judged explanation score following an expert-written rubric assessing conceptual understanding of each world. Across eleven frontier models, we find that the strongest agents pass only half of the worlds and consistently fail on those where latent structure must be uncovered. Open-source models lag substantially behind commercial models, both in their ability to design informative experiments and in extracting conclusions from the data. We further find that good predictive accuracy does not guarantee high explanation quality and that conceptual understanding depends on hypothesis refinement through well-chosen experiments.

Matt L. Wiemann, Lindsay M. Smith, Peter Melchior +4

Princeton University · Work done during internship at NYU/Polymathic AI. · Boston University +3

Physical Reasoning Scientific Discovery AI Agent Benchmarks System Identification Large Language Model-Guided Scientific Discovery