Benchmark Design

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Benchmark design studies how to turn a capability or real-world job into tasks, datasets, scoring rules, and protocols that support fair, reproducible comparisons. Common approaches include expert-curated and executable tests, domain-specific suites, hidden or refreshed items, controlled splits and stress tests, and multi-metric or rubric-based scoring. Researchers also audit validity, leakage, shortcuts, uncertainty, saturation, and ranking sensitivity, while increasingly evaluating full agent workflows under realistic tools, budgets, and deployment constraints. The central tension is making evaluations realistic and current without sacrificing transparency, reproducibility, and comparability; a high score alone rarely establishes general capability or readiness for use.

Latest papers

394 papers47 papers in the last four weeks, up 21% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.

Mar 3, 2026

Quantifying Ranking Instability Across Evaluation Protocol Axes in Gene Regulatory Network Benchmarking

Benchmark rankings are routinely used to justify scientific claims about method quality in gene regulatory network (GRN) inference, yet the stability of these rankings under plausible evaluation protocol choices is rarely examined. We present a systematic diagnostic framework for measuring ranking instability under protocol shift, including decomposition tools that separate base rate effects from discrimination effects. Using existing single cell GRN benchmark outputs across three human tissues and six inference methods, we quantify pairwise reversal rates across four protocol axes: candidate set restriction (16.3 percent, 95 percent CI 11.0 to 23.4 percent), tissue context (19.3 percent), reference network choice (32.1 percent), and symbol mapping policy (0.0 percent). A permutation null confirms that observed reversal rates are far below random order expectations (0.163 versus null mean 0.500), indicating partially stable but non invariant ranking structure. Our decomposition reveals that reversals are driven by changes in the relative discrimination ability of methods rather than by base rate inflation, a finding that challenges a common implicit assumption in GRN benchmarking. We propose concrete reporting practices for stability aware evaluation and provide a diagnostic toolkit for identifying method pairs at risk of reversal.

Ihor Kendiukhov

Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Germany

Benchmark Design Benchmark Validity Pairwise Ranking Gene Regulatory Network Inference

Mar 3, 2026

Valet: A Standardized Testbed of Traditional Imperfect-Information Card Games

AI algorithms for imperfect-information games are typically compared using performance metrics on individual games, making it difficult to assess robustness across game choices. Card games are a natural domain for imperfect information due to hidden hands and stochastic draws. To facilitate comparative research on imperfect-information game-playing algorithms and game systems, we introduce Valet, a diverse and comprehensive testbed of 21 traditional imperfect-information card games. These games span multiple genres, cultures, player counts, deck structures, mechanics, winning conditions, and methods of hiding and revealing information. To standardize implementations across systems, we encode the rules of each game in RECYCLE, a card game description language. We empirically characterize each game's branching factor and duration using random simulations, reporting baseline score distributions for a Monte Carlo Tree Search player against random opponents to demonstrate the suitability of Valet as a benchmarking suite.

Mark Goadrich, Achille Morenville, Éric Piette

Hendrix College, Conway AR 72032, USA · ICTEAM, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Imperfect-Information Games AI Agent Benchmarks Benchmark Design

Mar 2, 2026

SEED-SET: Scalable Evolving Experimental Design for System-level Ethical Testing

As autonomous systems such as drones, become increasingly deployed in high-stakes, human-centric domains, it is critical to evaluate the ethical alignment since failure to do so imposes imminent danger to human lives, and long term bias in decision-making. Automated ethical benchmarking of these systems is understudied due to the lack of ubiquitous, well-defined metrics for evaluation, and stakeholder-specific subjectivity, which cannot be modeled analytically. To address these challenges, we propose SEED-SET, a Bayesian experimental design framework that incorporates domain-specific objective evaluations, and subjective value judgments from stakeholders. SEED-SET models both evaluation types separately with hierarchical Gaussian Processes, and uses a novel acquisition strategy to propose interesting test candidates based on learnt qualitative preferences and objectives that align with the stakeholder preferences. We validate our approach for ethical benchmarking of autonomous agents on two applications and find our method to perform the best. Our method provides an interpretable and efficient trade-off between exploration and exploitation, by generating up to

2\times

optimal test candidates compared to baselines, with

1.25\times

improvement in coverage of high dimensional search spaces.

Anjali Parashar, Yingke Li, Eric Yang Yu +4

Laboratory for Information & Decision Systems (LIDS), MIT · Saab Inc.

AI Safety Evaluation Benchmark Design Bayesian Experimental Design Agent Benchmarks

Feb 27, 2026

AIDABench: AI Data Analytics Benchmark

As AI-driven document understanding and processing tools become increasingly prevalent in real-world applications, the need for rigorous evaluation standards has grown increasingly urgent. Existing benchmarks and evaluations often focus on isolated capabilities or simplified scenarios, failing to capture the end-to-end task effectiveness required in practical settings. To address this gap, we introduce AIDABench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating AI systems on complex data analytics tasks in an end-to-end manner. AIDABench encompasses 600+ diverse document analysis tasks across three core capability dimensions: question answering, data visualization, and file generation. These tasks are grounded in realistic scenarios involving heterogeneous data types, including spreadsheets, databases, financial reports, and operational records, and reflect analytical demands across diverse industries and job functions. Notably, the tasks in AIDABench are sufficiently challenging that even human experts require 1-2 hours per question when assisted by AI tools, underscoring the benchmark's difficulty and real-world complexity. We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art models on AIDABench, spanning both proprietary (e.g., Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro Preview) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-Max-2026-01-23-Thinking) families. Our results reveal that complex, real-world data analytics tasks remain a significant challenge for current AI systems, with the best-performing model achieving only 59.43% pass-at-1. We provide a detailed analysis of failure modes across each capability dimension and identify key challenges for future research. AIDABench offers a principled reference for enterprise procurement, tool selection, and model optimization, and is publicly available at https://github.com/MichaelYang-lyx/AIDABench.

Yibo Yang, Fei Lei, Yixuan Sun +24

SenseTime Research · Shanghai AI Laboratory · MMLab, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

LLM Evaluation Benchmark Design Document Understanding

Feb 27, 2026

From Static Benchmarks to Dynamic Protocol: Agent-Centric Text Anomaly Detection for Evaluating LLM Reasoning

The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has predominantly relied on static datasets, which offer limited scalability and fail to capture the evolving reasoning capabilities of recent models. To overcome these limitations, we propose an agent-centric benchmarking paradigm that moves beyond static datasets by introducing a dynamic protocol in which autonomous agents iteratively generate, validate, and solve problems. Within this protocol, a teacher agent generates candidate problems, an orchestrator agent rigorously verifies their validity and guards against adversarial attacks, and a student agent attempts to solve the validated problems. An invalid problem is revised by the teacher agent until it passes validation. If the student correctly solves the problem, the orchestrator prompts the teacher to generate more challenging variants. Consequently, the benchmark scales in difficulty automatically as more capable agents are substituted into any role, enabling progressive evaluation of large language models without manually curated datasets. Adopting text anomaly detection as our primary evaluation format, which demands cross-sentence logical inference and resists pattern-matching shortcuts, we demonstrate that this protocol systematically exposes corner-case reasoning errors that conventional benchmarks fail to reveal. We further advocate evaluating systems along several complementary axes including cross-model pairwise performance and progress between the initial and orchestrator-finalized problems. By shifting the focus from fixed datasets to dynamic protocols, our approach offers a sustainable direction for evaluating ever-evolving language models and introduces a research agenda centered on the co-evolution of agent-centric benchmarks.

Seungdong Yoa, Sanghyu Yoon, Suhee Yoon +4

LG AI Research · Division of Computer Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

Language Model Reasoning Evaluation LLM Evaluation Benchmark Design AI Agent Benchmarks

Feb 26, 2026

FlexMS: A Unified Public Benchmark for Molecule Tandem Mass Spectrum Prediction

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is central to small molecule identification, but current deep learning systems for spectrum prediction still remain difficult to evaluate and deploy in practice. While novel architectures constantly claim state-of-the-art performance, inconsistent metadata conditioning and entangled preprocessing pipelines hinder fair architectural comparisons. Besides, existing evaluations are often restricted to curated datasets, failing to capture the heterogeneity and cross-domain shifts of real-world metabolomics. Furthermore, current benchmarks lack difficulty-aware diagnostics and leave blind to how models behave under specific compute or data constraints. To address this, we present FlexMS, a modular public-data benchmark framework that standardizes MS/MS prediction across public resources while keeping molecular encoders, metadata conditioning, predictor heads, and downstream retrieval under one protocol. FlexMS establishes a fair evaluation playground which significantly lowers the barrier for integrating new predictive tools. Rather than solely optimizing for average scores, FlexMS augments aggregate accuracy with difficulty-aware diagnostics, providing actionable guidance on model selection across different compute constraints, data scales, and downstream retrieval objectives. Ultimately, FlexMS provides the community with a reproducible standard to identify which algorithmic conclusions are stable and which operating points are most viable in practice.

Yunhua Zhong, Yixuan Tang, Yifan Li +5

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou). · The University of Hong Kong. · Yangzhou University. +3

Benchmark Design Mass Spectrometry

Feb 25, 2026

BenchBrowser: Retrieving Evidence for Evaluating Benchmark Validity

Do language model benchmarks actually measure what practitioners intend them to ? High-level metadata is too coarse to convey the granular reality of benchmarks: a "poetry" benchmark may never test for haikus, while "instruction-following" benchmarks will often test for an arbitrary mix of skills. This opacity makes verifying alignment with practitioner goals a laborious process, risking an illusion of competence even when models fail on untested facets of user interests. We introduce BenchBrowser, a retriever that surfaces evaluation items relevant to natural language use cases over 20 benchmark suites. Validated by a human study confirming high retrieval precision, BenchBrowser generates evidence to help practitioners diagnose low content validity (narrow coverage of a capability's facets) and low convergent validity (lack of stable rankings when measuring the same capability). BenchBrowser, thus, helps quantify a critical gap between practitioner intent and what benchmarks actually test.

Harshita Diddee, Gregory Yauney, Swabha Swayamdipta +1

Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (PA), United States · Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (CA), United States

Benchmark Validity Benchmark Design

Feb 24, 2026

Qwen-BIM: developing large language model for BIM-based design with domain-specific benchmark and dataset

As the construction industry advances toward digital transformation, BIM (Building Information Modeling)-based design has become a key driver supporting intelligent construction. Despite Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential in promoting BIM-based design, the lack of specific datasets and LLM evaluation benchmarks has significantly hindered the performance of LLMs. Therefore, this paper addresses this gap by proposing: 1) an evaluation benchmark for BIM-based design together with corresponding quantitative indicators to evaluate the performance of LLMs, 2) a method for generating textual data from BIM and constructing corresponding BIM-derived datasets for LLM evaluation and fine-tuning, and 3) a fine-tuning strategy to adapt LLMs for BIM-based design. Results demonstrate that the proposed domain-specific benchmark effectively and comprehensively assesses LLM capabilities, highlighting that general LLMs are still incompetent for domain-specific tasks. Meanwhile, with the proposed benchmark and datasets, Qwen-BIM is developed and achieves a 21.0% average increase in G-Eval score compared to the base LLM model. Notably, with only 14B parameters, performance of Qwen-BIM is comparable to that of general LLMs with 671B parameters for BIM-based design tasks. Overall, this study develops the first domain-specific LLM for BIM-based design by introducing a comprehensive benchmark and high-quality dataset, which provide a solid foundation for developing BIM-related LLMs in various fields.

Jia-Rui Lin, Yun-Hong Cai, Xiang-Rui Ni +2

Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 · Key Laboratory of Digital Construction and Digital Twin, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing, China, 100084 · PetroChina Planning & Engineering Institute, Beijing, China, 100083

Benchmark Design LLM Evaluation Building Information Modeling LLM Fine-Tuning

Feb 24, 2026

CausalReasoningBenchmark: A Real-World Benchmark for Disentangled Evaluation of Causal Identification and Estimation

Many benchmarks for automated causal inference evaluate a system's performance based on a single numerical output, such as an Average Treatment Effect (ATE). This approach conflates two distinct steps in causal analysis: identification, formulating a valid research design under stated assumptions, and estimation, implementing that design numerically on finite data. We introduce CausalReasoningBenchmark, a benchmark of 174 queries across 139 real-world datasets, curated from 73 peer-reviewed research papers and three widely used causal-inference textbooks. For each query, a system must produce (i) a structured identification specification that names the strategy, the treatment, outcome, and control variables, and all design-specific elements, and (ii) a point estimate with a standard error. By scoring these two components separately, our benchmark enables granular diagnosis: it distinguishes failures in causal reasoning from errors in numerical execution. Baseline results with a state-of-the-art LLM show that, while the model correctly identifies the high-level strategy in 81% of cases, full identification-specification correctness drops to only 38%, revealing that the bottleneck lies in the nuanced details of research design rather than in computation. CausalReasoningBenchmark is publicly available on Hugging Face and is designed to foster the development of more robust automated causal-inference systems.

Ayush Sawarni, Jiyuan Tan, Vasilis Syrgkanis

Stanford University

Causal Effect Estimation Benchmark Design Causal Identifiability Causal Reasoning Causal Inference

Feb 20, 2026

1D-Bench: A Benchmark for Iterative UI Code Generation with Visual Feedback in Real-World

Design-to-code translates high-fidelity UI designs into executable front-end implementations, but progress remains hard to compare due to inconsistent datasets, toolchains, and evaluation protocols. We introduce 1D-Bench, a benchmark grounded in real e-commerce workflows, where each instance provides a reference rendering and an exported intermediate representation that may contain extraction errors. 1D is short for one day, representing the efficient completion of design-to-code tasks in less than one day. Models take both as input, using the intermediate representation as structural cues while being evaluated against the reference rendering, which tests robustness to intermediate representation defects rather than literal adherence. 1D-Bench requires generating an executable React codebase under a fixed toolchain with an explicit component hierarchy, and defines a multi-round setting in which models iteratively apply component-level edits using execution feedback. Experiments on commercial and open-weight multimodal models show that iterative editing generally improves final performance by increasing rendering success and often improving visual similarity. We further conduct a pilot study on post-training with synthetic repair trajectories and reinforcement learning based editing, and observe limited and unstable gains that may stem from sparse terminal rewards and high-variance file-level updates. The data and scripts used in this study are available in an anonymized repository at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/d2c-benchmark-A9C4/.

Qiao Xu, Yipeng Yu, Chengxiao Feng +1

Taobao & Tmall Group of Alibaba

Benchmark Design Execution-Guided Code Generation Code Generation Code Generation Benchmarks

Feb 19, 2026

Two-Bridge: Exclusive Objectives and Extended Horizon StarCraft II Benchmark

The research community lacks a middle ground between StarCraft II full game and its mini-games. The full-game's sprawling state-action space renders reward signals sparse and noisy, but in mini-games simple agents saturate performance. This complexity gap hinders steady curriculum design and prevents researchers from experimenting with modern Reinforcement Learning algorithms in RTS environments under realistic compute budgets. To fill this gap, we present the Two-Bridge Map Suite, the first entry in an open-source benchmark series we purposely engineered as an intermediate benchmark to sit between these extremes. By disabling economy mechanics such as resource collection, base building, and fog-of-war, the environment isolates two core tactical skills: long-range navigation and micro-combat. Preliminary experiments show that agents learn coherent maneuvering and engagement behaviors without imposing full-game computational costs. Two-Bridge is released as a lightweight, Gym-compatible wrapper on top of PySC2, with maps, wrappers, and reference scripts fully open-sourced to encourage broad adoption as a standard benchmark.

Sourav Panda, Tanmay Ambadkar, Shreyash Kale +2

Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA.

RL Benchmarks Game-Playing Agents Benchmark Design Agent Benchmarks

Feb 18, 2026

When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

Artificial intelligence benchmarks are an important mechanism to measure model progress and guide deployment decisions. However, benchmarks quickly "saturate", making it difficult to differentiate models and diminishing their long-term value. In this study, we define benchmark saturation and analyze it across 60 language model benchmarks using 14 properties that relate to saturation. We find that nearly half of our benchmarks exhibit saturation, with rates increasing with age. Further, we find that resilience to saturation is impacted by expert-curation, not by public test data. Our results suggest that design choices can extend benchmark longevity and inform more durable evaluation approaches.

Mubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni +34

ETH Zurich · ETH AI Center · Stanford University +23

LLM Evaluation Benchmark Design

Feb 18, 2026

LiveClin: A Live Clinical Benchmark without Leakage

The reliability of medical LLM evaluation is critically undermined by data contamination and knowledge obsolescence, leading to inflated scores on static benchmarks. To address these challenges, we introduce LiveClin, a live benchmark designed for approximating real-world clinical practice. Built from contemporary, peer-reviewed case reports and updated biannually, LiveClin ensures clinical currency and resists data contamination. Using a verified AI-human workflow involving 239 physicians, we transform authentic patient cases into complex, multimodal evaluation scenarios that span the entire clinical pathway. The benchmark currently comprises 1,407 case reports and 6,605 questions. Our evaluation of 26 models on LiveClin reveals the profound difficulty of these real-world scenarios, with the top-performing model achieving a Case Accuracy of just 35.7%. In benchmarking against human experts, Chief Physicians achieved the highest accuracy, followed closely by Attending Physicians, with both surpassing most models. LiveClin thus provides a continuously evolving, clinically grounded framework to guide the development of medical LLMs towards closing this gap and achieving greater reliability and real-world utility. Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/AQ-MedAI/LiveClin.

Xidong Wang, Shuqi Guo, Yue Shen +6

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, ShenZhen · Ant Healthcare, Ant Group · The Ohio State University +1

Clinical Language Model Evaluation Medical LLMs Benchmark Design Clinical Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation

Feb 16, 2026

OPBench: A Graph Benchmark to Combat the Opioid Crisis

The opioid epidemic continues to ravage communities worldwide, straining healthcare systems, disrupting families, and demanding urgent computational solutions. To combat this lethal opioid crisis, graph learning methods have emerged as a promising paradigm for modeling complex drug-related phenomena. However, a significant gap remains: there is no comprehensive benchmark for systematically evaluating these methods across real-world opioid crisis scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce OPBench, the first comprehensive opioid benchmark comprising five datasets across three critical application domains: opioid overdose detection from healthcare claims, illicit drug trafficking detection from digital platforms, and drug misuse prediction from dietary patterns. Specifically, OPBench incorporates diverse graph structures, including heterogeneous graphs and hypergraphs, to preserve the rich and complex relational information among drug-related data. To address data scarcity, we collaborate with domain experts and authoritative institutions to curate and annotate datasets while adhering to privacy and ethical guidelines. Furthermore, we establish a unified evaluation framework with standardized protocols, predefined data splits, and reproducible baselines to facilitate fair and systematic comparison among graph learning methods. Through extensive experiments, we analyze the strengths and limitations of existing graph learning methods, thereby providing actionable insights for future research in combating the opioid crisis. Our source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/Tianyi-Billy-Ma/OPBench.

Tianyi Ma, Yiyang Li, Yiyue Qian +4

University of Notre Dame · Amazon · University of Connecticut

Benchmark Design Healthcare

Jan 19, 2026

An Evolutionary Framework for Automatic Optimization Benchmark Generation via Large Language Models

Optimization benchmarks play a fundamental role in assessing algorithm performance; however, existing artificial benchmarks often fail to capture the diversity and irregularity of real-world problem structures, while benchmarks derived from real-world problems are costly and difficult to construct. To address these challenges, we propose an evolutionary automatic benchmark generation framework that leverages a large language model (LLM) as a generative operator, termed the LLM-driven evolutionary benchmark generator (LLM-EBG). In this framework, the LLM serves as an evolutionary operator that generates and evolves benchmark problems within a flexible, expressive representation space. As a case study, we generate unconstrained single-objective continuous minimization problems represented as mathematical expressions designed to induce significant performance differences between a genetic algorithm (GA) and differential evolution (DE). Experimental results show that LLM-EBG successfully produces benchmark problems in which the designated target algorithm consistently outperforms the comparative algorithm in more than 80% of trials. Furthermore, exploratory landscape analysis reveals that benchmarks favoring GA are highly sensitive to variable scaling, demonstrating that the proposed framework can generate problems with distinct geometric characteristics that reflect the intrinsic search behaviors of different optimization algorithms.

Yuhiro Ono, Tomohiro Harada, Yukiya Miura

Graduate School of Systems Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 6-6, Asahigaoka, Hino, 1910065, Tokyo, Japan. · Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, 2552026 Shimo-okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama, 3388570, Saitama, Japan.

Evolutionary Optimization Benchmark Design Synthetic Benchmark Generation

Jan 15, 2026

DR-Arena: an Automated Evaluation Framework for Deep Research Agents

As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly operate as Deep Research (DR) Agents capable of autonomous investigation and information synthesis, reliable evaluation of their task performance has become a critical bottleneck. Current benchmarks predominantly rely on static datasets, which suffer from several limitations: limited task generality, temporal misalignment, and data contamination. To address these, we introduce DR-Arena, a fully automated evaluation framework that pushes DR agents to their capability limits through dynamic investigation. DR-Arena constructs real-time Information Trees from fresh web trends to ensure the evaluation rubric is synchronized with the live world state, and employs an automated Examiner to generate structured tasks testing two orthogonal capabilities: Deep reasoning and Wide coverage. DR-Arena further adopts Adaptive Evolvement Loop, a state-machine controller that dynamically escalates task complexity based on real-time performance, demanding deeper deduction or wider aggregation until a decisive capability boundary emerges. Experiments with six advanced DR agents demonstrate that DR-Arena achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.94 with the LMSYS Search Arena leaderboard. This represents the state-of-the-art alignment with human preferences without any manual efforts, validating DR-Arena as a reliable alternative for costly human adjudication.

Yiwen Gao, Ruochen Zhao, Yang Deng +1

National University of Singapore · Nanyang Technological University · Singapore Management University +1

Deep Research Agents Benchmark Design AI Agent Evaluation Automated Evaluation

Dec 20, 2025

Large-scale benchmarking of multi-objective soft-computing metaheuristics for redundancy allocation in repairable k-out-of-n systems

This paper presents a large-scale budget-aware benchmark of multi-objective soft-computing metaheuristics for a bi-objective redundancy allocation problem in repairable k-out-of-n systems. The problem combines cost minimization and steady-state availability maximization under weight constraints, with binary subsystem-level decisions determining both the number of redundant components and the redundancy strategy. Four strategies are considered: cold standby, warm standby, hot standby, and a mixed active-warm standby strategy. Subsystem availability is evaluated using continuous-time Markov chains, while the optimization task is treated as a constrained mixed-integer multi-objective problem. The study compares 65 metaheuristic algorithms from multiple algorithmic families under two initialization settings, with and without Scaled Binomial Initialization (SBI), across six case studies of increasing structural and dimensional complexity and four weight limits per case. Performance is assessed using hypervolume, budget-dependent convergence profiles, and non-parametric statistical comparisons. The results show that algorithm rankings are strongly budget-dependent, indicating that a single final-budget ranking can be misleading. SBI provides a substantial early advantage and can change the relative performance of competing methods, especially for larger instances. The best-performing algorithms vary across budget regimes: NNIA-SBI and CMOPSO-SBI are competitive under tight budgets, whereas NSGA-II+ARSBX-SBI performs robustly for medium and large budgets. From a system design perspective, Pareto-optimal solutions are dominated by hot standby and mixed redundancy strategies, while cold and warm standby rarely appear. The benchmark highlights the importance of initialization, computational budget, and problem complexity when selecting soft-computing optimizers for practical redundancy allocation.

Mateusz Oszczypała, David Ibehej, Jakub Kudela

Military University of Technology, gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego Street 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland. · Institute of Automation and Computer Science, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.

Benchmark Design Metaheuristic Optimization Multi-Objective Optimization

Nov 25, 2025

CarBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Neural Surrogates on High-Fidelity 3D Car Aerodynamics

Benchmarking has been the cornerstone of progress in computer vision, natural language processing, and the broader deep learning domain, driving algorithmic innovation through standardized datasets and reproducible evaluation protocols. The growing availability of large-scale Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) datasets has opened new opportunities for applying machine learning to aerodynamic and engineering design. Yet, despite this progress, there exists no standardized benchmark for large-scale numerical simulations in engineering design. In this work, we introduce CarBench, the first comprehensive benchmark dedicated to large-scale 3D car aerodynamics, performing a large-scale evaluation of state-of-the-art models on DrivAerNet++, the largest public dataset for automotive aerodynamics, containing over 8,000 high-fidelity car simulations. We assess eleven architectures spanning neural operator methods (e.g., Fourier Neural Operator), geometric deep learning (PointNet, RegDGCNN, PointMAE, PointTransformer), transformer-based neural solvers (Transolver, Transolver++, AB-UPT), and implicit field networks (TripNet). Beyond standard interpolation tasks, we perform cross-category experiments in which transformer-based solvers trained on a single car archetype are evaluated on unseen categories. Our analysis covers predictive accuracy, physical consistency, computational efficiency, and statistical uncertainty. To accelerate progress in data-driven engineering, we open-source the benchmark framework, including training pipelines, uncertainty estimation routines based on bootstrap resampling, and pretrained model weights, establishing the first reproducible foundation for large-scale learning from high-fidelity CFD simulations, available at https://github.com/Mohamedelrefaie/CarBench.

Mohamed Elrefaie, Dule Shu, Matt Klenk +1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA · Schwarzman College of Computing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA · Future Product Innovation, Toyota Research Institute, Los Altos, CA, USA

Automotive Aerodynamics Neural Surrogate Modeling Benchmark Design Computational Fluid Dynamics Neural Operators

Nov 8, 2025

SWE-fficiency: Can Language Models Optimize Real-World Repositories on Real Workloads?

Optimizing the performance of large-scale software repositories demands expertise in code reasoning and software engineering (SWE) to reduce runtime while preserving program correctness. However, most benchmarks emphasize what to fix rather than how to fix code. We introduce SWE-fficiency, a benchmark for evaluating repository-level performance optimization on real workloads. Our suite contains 498 tasks across nine widely used data-science, machine-learning, and HPC repositories (e.g., numpy, pandas, scipy): given a complete codebase and a slow workload, an agent must investigate code semantics, localize bottlenecks and relevant tests, and produce a patch that matches or exceeds expert speedup while passing the same unit tests. To enable this how-to-fix evaluation, our automated pipeline scrapes GitHub pull requests for performance-improving edits, combining keyword filtering, static analysis, coverage tooling, and execution validation to both confirm expert speedup baselines and identify relevant repository unit tests. Empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art agents reveals significant underperformance. On average, agents achieve less than 0.23x the expert speedup: agents struggle in localizing optimization opportunities, reasoning about execution across functions, and maintaining correctness in proposed edits. We release the benchmark and accompanying data pipeline to facilitate research on automated performance engineering and long-horizon software reasoning.

Jeffrey Jian Ma, Milad Hashemi, Amir Yazdanbakhsh +5

Harvard University · Google DeepMind · Princeton University +2

Software Engineering Agents Benchmark Design Software Engineering Benchmarks Automated Software Engineering

Oct 31, 2025

MLPerf Automotive

We present MLPerf Automotive, the first standardized public performance benchmark for evaluating Machine Learning systems that are deployed for AI acceleration in automotive systems. Developed through a collaborative partnership within MLCommons, this benchmark addresses the need for standardized performance evaluation methodologies in automotive machine learning systems. Existing benchmark suites cannot be utilized for these systems since automotive workloads have unique constraints including sensor suites, safety, and real-time processing that distinguish them from the domains that previously introduced benchmarks target. Our implemented and adopted MLPerf Automotive benchmark is a framework for evaluation and methodology for benchmarking automotive systems with reproducible performance metrics. The benchmark consists of automotive perception tasks in 2D object detection, 2D semantic segmentation, 3D object detection, end-to-end driving, and an infotainment system application. We carefully curated and customized models for automotive use cases. We describe the methodology behind the benchmark design including the task selection, reference models, and submission rules. We also discuss the challenges involved in acquiring the datasets and the engineering efforts to develop the reference implementations. Our benchmark code is available at https://github.com/mlcommons/mlperf_automotive.

Radoyeh Shojaei, Predrag Djurdjevic, Mostafa El-Khamy +7

University of California, Davis · Arm · Samsung +5

End-to-End Autonomous Driving Benchmark Design Autonomous Driving Perception

Oct 27, 2025

The Benchmarking Epistemology: Validity Theory for Evaluating Machine Learning Models

Predictive benchmarking, evaluating machine learning models based on predictive performance and competitive ranking, is central to machine learning research and scientific inquiry. However, benchmark scores at best measure performance relative to a specific dataset and learning problem. Drawing substantial scientific inferences requires additional assumptions. Adapting ideas from psychological validity theory, we propose validity conditions that make these assumptions explicit. In two case studies---ImageNet and the Fragile Families Challenge---we show how benchmark results can support inferences about research progress and limits of predictability, situating predictive benchmarking as a distinct epistemic practice in machine learning.

Timo Freiesleben, Sebastian Zezulka

LMU Munich, MCMP & MCML · University of Tübingen

Benchmark Design Benchmark Validity

Oct 9, 2025

oMeBench: Towards Robust Benchmarking of LLMs in Organic Mechanism Elucidation and Reasoning

Organic reaction mechanisms describe the step-wise elementary processes by which reactants transform into intermediates and products, and are fundamental to understanding chemical reactivity and guiding molecular and reaction de-sign. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise on chemical tasks such as synthesis design, it remains unclear to what extent this reflects genuine chemical reasoning capabilities: the ability to generate chemically valid intermediates, maintain consistency across reaction steps, and follow logically coherent multi-step pathways. To investigate this, we introduce oMeBench, the first large-scale, expert-curated benchmark for organic mechanism reasoning, comprising over 10,000 annotated mechanistic steps with reaction type labels, intermediate structures, and difficulty ratings. To enable fine-grained evaluation, we further propose oMeS, a dynamic scoring framework that jointly assesses step-level logical consistency and chemical structural similarity. Systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that while current models exhibit promising chemical intuition, they struggle to produce correct and consistent reasoning across multi-step mechanisms. Notably, combining prompting strategies with fine-tuning enables smaller-scale models to achieve performance comparable to closed-source frontier models. We hope oMeBench will serve as a rigorous foundation for advancing AI systems toward genuine chemical reasoning.

Ruiling Xu, Yifan Zhang

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

LLM Evaluation Benchmark Design LLM Reasoning

Oct 5, 2025

TOPO-Bench: An Open-Source Topological Mapping Evaluation Framework with Quantifiable Perceptual Aliasing

Topological mapping offers a compact and robust representation for navigation, but progress in the field is hindered by the lack of standardized evaluation metrics, datasets, and protocols. Existing systems are assessed using different environments and criteria, preventing fair and reproducible comparisons. Moreover, a key challenge - perceptual aliasing - remains under-quantified, despite its strong influence on system performance. We address these gaps by (1) formalizing topological consistency as the fundamental property of topological maps and showing that localization accuracy provides an efficient and interpretable surrogate metric, and (2) proposing the first quantitative measure of dataset ambiguity to enable fair comparisons across environments. To support this protocol, we curate a diverse benchmark dataset with calibrated ambiguity levels, implement and release deep-learned baseline systems, and evaluate them alongside classical methods. Our experiments and analysis yield new insights into the limitations of current approaches under perceptual aliasing. All datasets, baselines, and evaluation tools are fully open-sourced to foster consistent and reproducible research in topological mapping.

Jiaming Wang, Jizhuo Chen, Diwen Liu +1

Benchmark Design Map-Based Localization Topological Mapping

Sep 30, 2025

fev-bench: A Realistic Benchmark for Time Series Forecasting

Benchmark quality is critical for meaningful evaluation and sustained progress in time series forecasting, particularly with the rise of pretrained models. Existing benchmarks often have limited domain coverage or overlook real-world settings such as tasks with covariates. Their aggregation procedures frequently lack statistical rigor, making it unclear whether observed performance differences reflect true improvements or random variation. Many benchmarks lack consistent evaluation infrastructure or are too rigid for integration into existing pipelines. To address these gaps, we propose fev-bench, a benchmark of 100 forecasting tasks across seven domains, including 46 with covariates. Supporting the benchmark, we introduce fev, a lightweight Python library for forecasting evaluation emphasizing reproducibility and integration with existing workflows. Using fev, fev-bench employs principled aggregation with bootstrapped confidence intervals to report performance along two dimensions: win rates and skill scores. We report results on fev-bench for pretrained, statistical, and baseline models and identify promising future research directions.

Oleksandr Shchur, Abdul Fatir Ansari, Caner Turkmen +5

AWS · Keystone AI · Prior Labs +2

Benchmark Design Time Series Forecasting Forecasting Benchmarks Time Series Forecasting with Covariates Benchmark Validity

Sep 30, 2025

IMProofBench: Benchmarking AI on Research-Level Mathematical Proof Generation

As the mathematical capabilities of large language models (LLMs) improve, it becomes increasingly important to evaluate their performance on research-level tasks at the frontier of mathematical knowledge. However, existing benchmarks are limited, as they focus solely on final-answer questions or high-school competition problems. To address this gap, we introduce IMProofBench, a private benchmark consisting of 77 peer-reviewed problems developed by expert mathematicians. Each problem requires a detailed proof and is paired with subproblems that have final answers, supporting both an evaluation by human experts and a large-scale quantitative analysis through automated grading. Furthermore, unlike prior benchmarks, the evaluation setup simulates a realistic research environment: models operate in an agentic framework with tools like web search for literature review and mathematical software such as SageMath. Our results show that current LLMs can already solve a significant percentage of research-level questions. IMProofBench will continue to evolve as a dynamic benchmark in collaboration with the mathematical community, ensuring its relevance for evaluating the next generation of LLMs.

Johannes Schmitt, Gergely Bérczi, Jasper Dekoninck +57

Mathematical Reasoning Benchmarks LLM Evaluation Benchmark Design Mathematical Reasoning LLM Mathematical Reasoning

Sep 27, 2025

WirelessMathBench-XL: An Auditable Benchmark for Wireless Mathematical Reasoning

Technical-domain benchmarks constructed from arXiv papers can overlap the same public text used in LLM pretraining. Auditing this risk at training-corpus scale requires searching billions of corpus n-grams while retaining per-item evidence that users can inspect and recompute. We contribute a reverse-probe audit at a fixed 13-gram threshold: it indexes benchmark prompts, streams public pretraining corpora, and emits per-problem prompt-surface lexical-overlap metadata with memory that scales with the benchmark. We instantiate the protocol in WirelessMathBench-XL, a 4,027-problem wireless mathematical-reasoning benchmark built from 836 retained arXiv papers across 20 subfields. Against 12.9B streamed 13-grams from RedPajama-arXiv, the audit identifies a strict zero-hit view S0 covering 3,853 problems (95.7%). Filtering to S0 changes accuracy by less than 1 pp for every evaluated model; frontier calibration rows form one high-accuracy cluster between 86.5% and 91.3%, not a resolved rank order. Only 30/800 test items carry detected overlap. Under an all-flagged-correct counterfactual, their largest possible positive score inflation is 0.31-0.51 pp for the frontier rows, so full-versus-S0 is a bounded, structurally underpowered stability summary rather than a contamination-effect test or cleanliness claim. The audit channel does not cover paraphrase, target-answer, post-training, or closed-corpus exposure. The release includes source-paper identifiers, verifier-facing ground truths, audit and threshold metadata, filtered views, a paper-disjoint sensitivity view, evaluation traces, paired-bootstrap scripts, training recipes, Croissant metadata, and a Datasheet for Datasets.

Xin Li, Mengbing Liu, Yiyang Zhu +4

Nanyang Technological University

Mathematical Reasoning Benchmarks Benchmark Auditing LLM Auditing Benchmark Design Benchmark Contamination Benchmark Validity

May 25, 2025

PDFBench: A Benchmark for De novo Protein Design from Function

Function-guided protein design is a crucial task with significant applications in drug discovery and enzyme engineering. However, the field lacks a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework. Current models are assessed using inconsistent and limited subsets of metrics, which prevents fair comparison and a clear understanding of the relationships between different evaluation criteria. To address this gap, we introduce PDFBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for function-guided denovo protein design. Our benchmark systematically evaluates eight state-of-the-art models on 16 metrics across two key settings: description-guided design, for which we repurpose the Mol-Instructions dataset, originally lacking quantitative benchmarking, and keyword-guided design, for which we introduce a new test set, SwissTest, created with a strict datetime cutoff to ensure data integrity. By benchmarking across a wide array of metrics and analyzing their correlations, PDFBench enables more reliable model comparisons and provides key insights to guide future research.

Jiahao Kuang, Nuowei Liu, Jie Wang +3

School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University · Institute of Artificial Intelligence (TeleAI), China Telecom · College of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Fudan University

Benchmark Design Molecular Generation Protein Design

May 1, 2025

Multimodal Language Models as Text-to-Image Model Evaluators

The steady improvements of text-to-image (T2I) generative models lead to slow deprecation of automatic evaluation benchmarks that rely on static datasets, motivating researchers to seek alternative ways to evaluate T2I progress. We present Multimodal Text-to-Image Eval (MT2IE), an evaluation framework in which a single multimodal large language model (MLLM) acts as an evaluator agent, iteratively generating the evaluation prompts and scoring the resulting images. We show that MT2IE's image-text consistency scores have higher correlation with human judgment than metrics previously introduced in the literature. MT2IE generates prompts that are efficient at probing T2I model performance: closely recovering the official T2I model rankings of three structurally distinct benchmarks from just 20 generated evaluation prompts, 28-105x fewer than the benchmarks' own prompt sets. When compared to existing evaluation metrics such as CLIPScore, VIEScore, and VQAScore, MT2IE's T2I model rankings are more faithful and far more consistent across multiple evaluation seeds when using the same number of prompts. MT2IE can also adapt evaluation to the model being tested: rewriting each prompt based on the model's own measured performance to produce a bespoke per-model benchmark that still recovers the official rankings and keeps the evaluated model in an informative scoring range. We hope that these results will encourage the development of dynamic and interactive evaluation frameworks, and mitigate the deprecation of automatic evaluation benchmarks.

Jiahui Chen, Candace Ross, Reyhane Askari-Hemmat +5

1FAIR at Meta · University of Texas at Austin · ∗Work done at Meta +3

LLM-as-a-Judge Benchmark Design Automated Evaluation Vision-Language Model-as-a-Judge T2I Generation Evaluation MLLM Evaluation

Apr 25, 2025

BiasBench: A reproducible benchmark for tuning the biases of event cameras

Event-based cameras are bio-inspired sensors that detect light changes asynchronously for each pixel. They are increasingly used in fields like computer vision and robotics because of several advantages over traditional frame-based cameras, such as high temporal resolution, low latency, and high dynamic range. As with any camera, the output's quality depends on how well the camera's settings, called biases for event-based cameras, are configured. While frame-based cameras have advanced automatic configuration algorithms, there are very few such tools for tuning these biases. A systematic testing framework would require observing the same scene with different biases, which is tricky since event cameras only generate events when there is movement. Event simulators exist, but since biases heavily depend on the electrical circuit and the pixel design, available simulators are not well suited for bias tuning. To allow reproducibility, we present BiasBench, a novel event dataset containing multiple scenes with settings sampled in a grid-like pattern. We present three different scenes, each with a quality metric of the downstream application. Additionally, we present a novel, RL-based method to facilitate online bias adjustments.

Andreas Ziegler, David Joseph, Thomas Gossard +2

Cognitive Systems Group, University of Tübingen, Germany

Event-Based Vision Benchmark Design

Apr 10, 2025

Who Benchmarks the Benchmarks? Towards Comprehensive Evaluation of Commonsense Reasoning Benchmarks

Commonsense reasoning is a key language model capability, as it is purportedly a prerequisite for many basic tasks, unlike specific factual knowledge. It is often measured with multiple-choice questions (MCQ) benchmarks, e.g. HellaSwag and PIQA. Some of these benchmarks, however, are outdated and contain numerous validity issues. We illustrate some typical validity issues with a case study on HellaSwag, one of the most popular and problematic benchmarks for commonsense reasoning. The issues we find range from basic ungrammaticality and numerous typos to misleading prompts or equally correct options. We show that if we remove question prompts or replace them with "Lorem ipsum dolor...", about 68% of model predictions do not change. We argue that this occurs due to inner flaws in the benchmark, not mere contamination that might be present in some models. Since benchmark scores are an essential part of model selection in both research and commercial applications, these issues can have severe consequences. Based on our findings, we propose BenCheck, a package for benchmark validity analysis that encapsulates the main checks performed in our case study and can be used to audit commonsense reasoning benchmarks. We apply these checks to PIQA, Global PIQA, and Winogrande.

Pavel Chizhov, Anton Changalidis, Vishnu Prasad Vijaya Kumar +4

1CAIRO, Technical University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt · 2PleIAs, Paris, France

Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark Auditing Reasoning Evaluation Benchmark Design Benchmark Validity