Dataset Aggregation

Robot policies are frequently trained from human corrections, yet teleoperating a robot to provide corrections is burdensome, and human demonstrators are not always optimal. We propose Blended DAgger (BlenDAgger), an approach for collecting data to train imitation learning policies by using shared control to blend the policy's and demonstrator's actions during interventions. By blending human and policy actions, we aim to improve the autonomous performance of manipulation policies. We validate our approach across five manipulation tasks, two in the real world and three in simulation. Our approach achieves higher autonomous performance by 30 or more percentage points on two real-world tasks compared to a typical human-gated correction approach (HG-DAgger). We also investigate the advantages of BlenDAgger that allow for higher autonomous performance, finding that BlenDAgger results in 57% smoother transitions between policy control and human interventions, and 14% higher trajectory similarity to the training data. In a user study (n=14) on two real-world tasks, we find that BlenDAgger results in faster data collection (BF=13.32), and we do not find a difference in subjective perceptions. These results show that blended shared control leads to higher autonomous performance compared to typical methods for fine-tuning robot policies from fully teleoperated interventions.

Learning generalist policies for robust bimanual manipulation is bottlenecked by the scarcity of high quality large scale human demonstration data. In this work, we release 1,500 hours of diverse bimanual manipulation demonstrations covering everyday household tasks, and use this comprehensive corpus to train XR-2, a powerful vision-language-action (VLA) model. Enabled by a purpose built high throughput data pipeline and a carefully designed multi stage training paradigm, XR-2 attains strong manipulation performance in our systematic experiments while retaining favorable training efficiency and high data utilization. We further study two critical scaling axes: varying the amount of expert demonstration data, and post training on DAgger correction data from real time human interventions. In both settings, task success rate improves steadily over the data ranges we probe, exhibiting a clear consistent scaling trend at our current data scale. These results validate both the learning capacity of XR-2 and the promising scaling properties of the released dataset, which we open source to support reproducible research on bimanual robot manipulation learning.

Target-oriented vision-and-language navigation (VLN) on aerial platforms is attracting growing attention for missions such as disaster rescue, infrastructure inspection, and security patrol. In this task, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) needs to locate targets given only a concise description of their appearance and surroundings. This requires global exploration and grounding as well as collision-free close-range approach, two interleaved processes difficult to reconcile within a single agent. Most existing methods transfer the ground VLN paradigm to a low-altitude UAV and compensate for its inefficient exploration with external assistance. A recent attempt deploys two UAVs at complementary altitudes yet still relies on privileged information and trains its two agents independently, precluding any mutual adaptation essential for cooperation. Here we propose CoNav-UAV, which explicitly models the task as a Stackelberg game between a high-altitude leader and a low-altitude follower, with the system operating on onboard visual and linguistic inputs alone. To solve this game, we introduce Iterative Stackelberg Learning. The leader's high-level vision-language reasoning is refined via memory-based in-context learning, while the follower's precise motion control is updated via DAgger-style expert distillation. The alternation drives both agents toward a Stackelberg equilibrium. CoNav-UAV consistently outperforms single- and dual-agent baselines across three high-fidelity urban scenes from the AerialVLN benchmark. Success rate improves by up to 30.8 points on the learning scene, and 9.0 points under cross-scene transfer while using about 3x less adaptation data. Further analyses validate the complementary gains of the leader and follower updates and reveal robust gains yet distinct learning dynamics across VLM backbones.

Comprehensively evaluating AI agents across interactive environments is difficult due to fragmented tasks, scaffolds, verifiers, and scoring rules. Unfortunately, existing efforts to unify these evaluations are limited in scale and domain, making costly reruns necessary and leaving available data incomparable. We introduce MESSIER, a unified corpus of 957,611 records spanning 30 benchmarks, 745 agents, 11,891 tasks, and 74,263 verifiers. MESSIER combines public evaluation results with new runs on six underrepresented professional and scientific benchmarks, standardizing their heterogeneous components into a common schema. Using this corpus, we show that frontier progress is uneven across benchmark groups, with function-calling evaluations largely saturated, programming improving fastest, and enterprise workflows remaining most challenging. Counterfactual rescoring further shows that strict all-pass scoring in multi-verifier tasks can alter agent rankings. Finally, we derive capability scores from our corpus that correlate with Epoch's Evaluation Capability Index rankings at Spearman \r{ho} = 0.84. The scores can also be estimated for subsets defined by domain, occupation, action space, or verifier type. In essence, MESSIER is a reusable resource for studying agent performance at scale, and a basis for designing better evaluations.

Accurately modeling cross-variate dependencies remains a key challenge in multivariate time series forecasting, particularly in the presence of strong periodic patterns. Many existing approaches rely on attention-based mechanisms that incur quadratic complexity and scale poorly with increasing numbers of variates. Recent attention-free aggregation models address this issue through linear-complexity core-based interactions, but they do not explicitly leverage the global periodic structure present in the data. To overcome this limitation, we propose CARNet, a Cycle-Conditioned Core Aggregation and Redistribution framework that integrates global recurrent cycle information into efficient core based interaction modeling via Multihead Core Aggregation. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world multivariate forecasting benchmarks demonstrate that CARNet consistently outperforms strong transformer and non-attention baselines across diverse prediction horizons while preserving linear-complexity modeling of cross-variate dependencies.

End-to-end autonomous driving models are typically trained on offline human-demonstration datasets that provide limited state coverage and often no closed-loop feedback, making them prone to compounding errors when deployed in closed-loop and brittle to long-tail agent interactions. To overcome these limitations, we propose an alternative strategy for training end-to-end driving models: large-scale self-play directly from pixels in simulation. While prior self-play approaches have shown promising transfer to real-world driving, they typically assume vectorized Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) observations that are incompatible with end-to-end policies operating directly on sensor observations. To this end, we introduce Gigapixel, a high-throughput batched driving simulator with perspective rendering, enabling scalable self-play directly from pixel observations. Rather than targeting compute-costly photorealistic sensor simulation, Gigapixel renders a simplified bounding-box world that preserves essential scene structure while achieving throughput at 50k agent steps per second. Since direct pixel-space self-play RL is prohibitively sample-inefficient at end-to-end model scale, we propose self-play DAgger training: we train pixel-based policies in self-play via on-policy distillation from a privileged RL teacher. To bridge the sim-to-real gap, we subsequently transfer the self-play trained policies to real-world sensor data through lightweight perception adaptation. Policies trained in Gigapixel and adapted to real-world sensor data achieve competitive performance on the HUGSIM and NAVSIM-v2 benchmarks without human trajectory supervision. Moreover, scaling self-play training yields proportional gains in policy performance, establishing self-play as a practical and scalable strategy for training end-to-end models.

Embodied intelligence is moving from laboratory demonstrations toward industrial deployment, with the logistics industry serving as a key application scenario. Learning-based policies offer a promising path beyond traditional perception-planning-control pipelines, but their scalability depends on how embodied data can be collected, organized, and reused. This research studies a data-centric framework for industrial embodied intelligence by constructing a logistics data flywheel. Our framework converts daily operations into reusable data assets, uses World Models to generate reliable supervision for long-tail parcel manipulation, and feeds deployment feedback back into policy improvement. As an initial result, \textit{WM-DAgger} introduces a World-Model-based data aggregation framework that synthesizes out-of-distribution recovery data for robust imitation learning. Building on this result, ongoing work explores how large-scale in-the-wild multimodal data, including labeled human demonstrations, unlabeled operational videos, and system-level robot logs, can be aligned for policy learning and transformed into feedback for continual system improvement.

Real-world household robots require Vision-Language-Action (VLA) foundation models that can acquire reusable manipulation skills across diverse objects, task conditions, and household environments. Deformable-object folding is a representative challenge, requiring robots to handle clothing items from random initial states across varying categories, geometries, materials, and scenes. However, existing VLA systems commonly train separate policies for different object categories, while naively mixed multi-task training often suffers from task interference and degraded performance. To move beyond category-specific folding policies, we introduce DeMaVLA, a VLA foundation model for generalizable Deformable Manipulation. DeMaVLA adopts a VLM backbone with an action expert and formulates continuous action generation using flow matching. To improve efficiency, the action expert is constructed by pruning every other transformer layer while preserving layer-wise alignment with the VLM backbone, reducing training and inference cost. DeMaVLA is first pre-trained on approximately 5,000 hours of selected real-world dual-arm demonstrations to acquire general manipulation priors. It is then post-trained on mixed folding data that aggregates self-collected demonstrations and corrective trajectories from real-robot failures across multiple folding tasks through a human-in-the-loop Data Aggregation~(DAgger) pipeline. Experiments show that DeMaVLA achieves competitive performance on RoboTwin 2.0 and strong real-world results on our household folding benchmark. These results highlight the value of scalable real-world data, efficient action generation, and corrective learning for general-purpose VLA policies in deformable-object manipulation.

Learning from demonstrations is effective for robotic manipulation, but collecting sufficient task-specific data remains a major bottleneck. Under distribution shift, small errors compound, performance degrades, and expert time is often spent on redundant, low-value corrections instead of the few critical failure cases. We present VR-DAgger, a human-in-the-loop framework centered on an immersive VR application for dexterous teleoperation, demonstration collection, and selective policy correction. The VR client provides intuitive hand control with synchronized scene visualization, while a backend workstation runs simulation and learning, enabling autonomous rollouts without continuous operator oversight. We use Monte Carlo (MC) dropout to score uncertainty during Isaac Lab rollouts of a diffusion policy and select informative failure segments for correction. These segments are replayed in VR as clips, where the operator selectively labels and corrects the policy's behavior, concentrating supervision where uncertainty is highest without full-rollout monitoring or a separate intervention classifier. We evaluate on three dexterous manipulation tasks (Pan pick-and-place, Drawer opening, Valve turning) with a 10-DoF XHand under standard and challenging initial configurations. Active labeling consistently improves over behavioral cloning across all tasks, with gains of up to 23 percentage points. Compared to unguided human-in-the-loop inspection, VR-DAgger reduces per-sample collection time by approximately 40% by focusing review on selected segments rather than full rollouts.

Long-horizon LM agents learn from multi-turn interaction, where a single early mistake can alter the subsequent state distribution and derail the whole trajectory. Existing recipes fall short in complementary ways: supervised fine-tuning provides dense teacher supervision but suffers from covariate shift because it is trained on off-policy teacher trajectories; while reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards avoids this off-policy mismatch by learning from on-policy rollouts but with only sparse outcome feedback. We address this dilemma by revisiting Dataset Aggregation (DAgger) for multi-turn LM agents: the algorithm collects trajectories through a turn-level interpolation of student and teacher policies, and the student is then trained on these trajectories using supervised labels provided by the teacher. By directly interacting with environments, we expose the model to realistic states likely to be encountered during deployment, thereby effectively mitigating covariate shift. Besides, since the student is learned by mimicking the teacher's behavior, it receives rich feedback during learning. To demonstrate DAgger enjoys the benefits of both worlds, we tested the algorithm to train a software-engineering agent with 4B- and 8B-scale student models. On SWE-bench Verified, our DAgger-style training improves over the strongest post-training baseline by +3.9 points at 4B and +3.6 points at 8B. The resulting 4B agent reaches 27.3%, outperforming representative published 8B SWE-agent systems, while the 8B agent achieves 29.8%, surpassing SWE-Gym-32B and coming within 5 points of stronger 32B-scale agents. Together with consistent gains on the held-out SWE-Gym split, these results suggest the effectiveness of DAgger for modern long-horizon LM agents.

Behavioral curve modeling -- fitting parametric functions to engagement-versus-exposure data -- is standard practice in recommendation, advertising, and clinical dosing. We show that aggregation introduces a systematic distortion: Simpson's paradox in behavioral curves. On Goodreads (3.3M users, 9 genres), individual users peak at n* approximately 11 exposures while the aggregate peaks at n* approximately 34 -- a 3x gap driven by survival bias. Amazon Electronics (18M reviews) shows a 5.3x distortion. MovieLens-25M (D approximately 1) serves as a negative control, confirming that survival bias -- not aggregation per se -- is the operative mechanism. The distortion is robust to category granularity, engagement operationalization, and classifier calibration. We develop Synthetic Null Calibration to address a 32% false positive rate in per-user classification. Our findings apply wherever individual behavioral parameters are estimated from aggregate curves under differential attrition.

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant promise in Vision-Language Navigation (VLN), existing agents remain heavily constrained by systemic bottlenecks across inference, training, and data collection. Specifically, they suffer from prohibitive latency due to visual history reprocessing, action leakage during sequence-packed training, and suboptimal exploration in self-correction data collection. To overcome these intertwined challenges, we present Efficient-VLN, a highly efficient and robust baseline that systematically resolves these issues through three simple-yet-effective mechanisms. (1) Inference: We introduce KV-cache reuse with contiguous RoPE, enabling the model to process only the newly observed frame at each step for real-time inference. (2) Training: We propose packed training with an action-isolating mask to accelerate throughput while effectively bridging the training-inference gap by preventing action leakage. (3) Data Collection: We employ an Adaptive DAgger to dynamically balance autonomous exploration and oracle guidance, enhancing error-recovery capability without escalating computational costs. Extensive evaluations show that Efficient-VLN significantly advances the state-of-the-art across the R2R-CE (73.2% SR) and RxR-CE (75.6% SR) benchmarks. Meanwhile, it yields a 28% latency reduction compared to the previous state-of-the-art StreamVLN, establishing a new paradigm for streaming MLLM-based navigation.

The construction of most supervised learning datasets revolves around collecting multiple labels for each instance, then aggregating the labels to form a type of "true" label. We question the wisdom of this pipeline by developing a (stylized) theoretical model of this process and analyzing its statistical consequences, showing how access to non-aggregated label information can make training well-calibrated models more feasible than it is with cleaned labels. The entire story, however, is subtle, and the contrasts between aggregated and fuller label information depend on the particulars of the problem, where estimators that use aggregated information exhibit robust but slower rates of convergence, while estimators that can effectively leverage all labels converge more quickly if they have fidelity to (or can learn) the true labeling process. The theory makes several predictions for real-world datasets, including when non-aggregate labels should improve learning performance, which we test to corroborate the validity of our predictions.