Evidence Retrieval
Momentum
20 papers in the last four weeks, up 150% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Latest papers 94
The functional annotation of genes in non-model organisms remains a significant challenge in computational biology, with 20-70% of sequenced genes lacking characterized functions. Traditional homology-based methods are often costly and strongly dependent on high sequence similarity. This study presents Homo-RAG, a framework for large language model-based gene function prediction that integrates homology-guided multi-hop retrieval with evidence-aware ranking. The framework exploits biological relationships between zebrafish and human orthologs to guide evidence acquisition from ZFIN, UniProt, and PubMed through hybrid dense and lexical retrieval. An Evidence Confidence Score (ECS) integrates semantic relevance, entity matching, orthology information, source reliability, and literature association signals to refine the ranking of retrieved evidence. Extensive evaluation across 150 queries and 7,200 retrieved documents shows that evidence weighting parameter of lambda=0.50 improves NDCG@10 to 0.9879 and MRR to 0.99, while retrieving relevant evidence for 99.33% of queries. Furthermore, 80% of the retrieved documents are query-exclusive, indicating that evidence quality complements rather than replaces retrieval relevance. These findings establish Homo-RAG as a practical and robust framework for reliable, evidence-grounded gene function prediction in understudied organisms. The study addresses important limitations of conventional annotation pipelines while identifying opportunities for future improvements in evidence features and attribution mechanisms.
AtlasNav: Mitigating Evidence Blindness with Persistent Corpus Navigation
As language-model agents become more capable of iterative search, corpus access is shifting from retrieval toward interaction. Agents can explore the corpus, inspect documents, and use newly discovered evidence to decide what to examine next. Yet accessible evidence may still fail to become usable within a finite interaction budget. We call this progressive failure Evidence Blindness: supporting documents may never enter view, may remain unopened, or may fail to expose the decisive evidence even after being opened. A key reason is that agents often have to infer useful evidence directions during interaction, spending limited budget on deciding where to search next. Existing approaches either leave corpus structure largely implicit or reconstruct useful directions at query time. AtlasNav instead organizes reusable cross-document structure before any query arrives. It builds a persistent multi-view Corpus Atlas, which each query can navigate adaptively while still accessing the original documents directly. On BrowseComp-Plus, AtlasNav outperforms the previous state-of-the-art interactive corpus access method across different backbones. On DeepSeek, it improves strict accuracy by 7.47 points while reducing query-time inference cost by 30.22%.AtlasNav also reduces Evidence Blindness, realizes complete evidence earlier, remains robust to corpus-structure and scale shifts on PhantomWiki, and achieves leading performance on heterogeneous enterprise data.
Do AI chatbots find what experts would? Effects of model, user role, and sample size on study retrieval for medical questions
Large language model (LLM) chatbots are increasingly used to answer clinical questions with citations to relevant studies, yet the quality of retrieved evidence and factors influencing study selection remain unclear. We evaluated three general-purpose LLM chatbots (Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and ChatGPT GPT-5.5) using 20 clinical questions adapted from 2026 Cochrane reviews. We simulated patient, clinician, and evidence-synthesis researcher roles and obtained four independent responses for each chatbot-role-question combination, yielding 720 responses (3 chatbots 3 user roles 4 repetitions 20 review questions). Chatbots were asked to support their answers with primary clinical citations, which were benchmarked against the included and excluded study sets of the corresponding Cochrane reviews. On average, a single response retrieved 39.2% 29.8% of the corresponding Cochrane included-study set and 5.0% 9.4% of the excluded-study set. Recall of included studies varied significantly by model and user role. ChatGPT achieved higher recall than Claude or Gemini (63.1% 29.5% vs. 37.0% 23.8% vs. 17.3% 13.1%; blocked permutation test, ), and the researcher role yielded higher recall than the clinician or patient roles (42.8% 30.8% vs. 38.6% 28.9% vs. 36.1% 29.3%; ). Controlling for publication year, citations per year, and open-access status, sample size was the only significant predictor of retrieval: each doubling of sample size was associated with 50% higher odds of retrieval (odds ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.24-1.81). These findings show that LLM chatbots can retrieve studies identified by expert reviewers, but retrieval varies substantially across models and user roles and favors larger clinical trials.
EviReform: Evidence-Guided Query Reformulation for Multi-Hop Graph Retrieval
Multi-hop retrieval must recover passages that provide sufficient evidence together. An initial passage often resolves an entity or relation implicit in the question, making the missing evidence easier to describe only after retrieval begins. Graph retrieval improves access to related evidence through stored corpus structure, but its retrieval signal is commonly derived from the original question. Complementary evidence must then be reached through stored relations even when an observed passage provides a more direct semantic cue. We introduce EviReform, which separates revising the retrieval request from aggregating evidence in the graph. Retrieved source passages formulate residual queries for the unresolved information need. The original and residual retrieval signals are normalized separately, combined, and propagated between propositions that share entities. On 2WikiMultiHopQA, HotpotQA, and MuSiQue, EviReform exceeds the strongest baseline by up to 5.59 Recall@5 points and 4.50 F1 points. These results show that observed evidence can guide graph retrieval toward the part of a supporting chain left underspecified by the original question. Code is available at https://github.com/XrazyMee/EviReform.
TRACE-Memory: Public-Conditioned Retrieval and Utility-Aware Evidence Admission for Personalized Generation
Personalized generation systems retrieve user history by request--memory relevance and inject it into the model context. Yet relevant history may concern the wrong preference aspect, duplicate public information, or provide insufficient support. We argue that personal memory should be used only when it adds utility beyond a public-only response. We propose TRACE-Memory, a two-stage framework for selective personalization. Stage 1 queries for user-specific information missing from the request and public context, then retrieves a coverage-oriented candidate pool. Stage 2 admits a compact subset of source-traceable evidence units, or the empty set, according to response-level incremental utility. We progressively train the query-generation and evidence-admission policies through structured SFT initialization, reduced-space stage-wise GRPO warm-up, and nested multi-sample Joint GRPO. Across 4,500 Controlled and Natural tasks from Goodreads, Amazon Reviews, and Reddit, TRACE-Memory consistently outperforms random and lexical memory use, improves over semantic retrieval, remains competitive with frontier-LLM memory pipelines as local generator capacity increases, and conditions evidence admission on public-context sufficiency, supporting selective rather than default personalization.
Search over the Visual World: Persistent Visual Memory, Layered Indexes, and Source-Grounded Evidence
Most video-retrieval systems assume a bounded corpus and return ranked files or timestamps. Agents operating over cameras, screens, streams, and archives face a different systems problem: observations arrive continuously; models interpret them at different temporal granularities; context must be selected without replaying the complete visual record; and results must stay connected to inspectable source evidence. We argue that search over such a corpus is an infrastructure problem that cannot be reduced to ranking video files. We develop a conceptual and formal model of search over the visual world built on analyzer-defined scenes, persistent understanding artifacts, visual memory as coexisting scene spaces over shared source time, and capability-declared indexes, distinguishing memory (everything retained), context (what is selected for a task), and evidence (the source intervals that ground it). The VideoDB data format (VDB) realizes this model in production, exposed through a typed search surface spanning planned retrieval, stateful investigation, direct access, and grounded synthesis. We contrast this model-agnostic infrastructure, where segmentation, sampling, model choice, embeddings, and ranking are system decisions and live streams are first-class sources, with video-native foundation models offered as fixed APIs. In a semantic-retrieval comparison against a commercial video-native engine spanning 9,800+ queries over four public datasets, a pipeline of general-purpose components achieves higher macro-averaged Recall@1/@3/@10 (73.09/83.39/91.20 versus 65.75/77.13/89.10), while the baseline is higher at Recall@50 (96.42 versus 96.07). Retrieval quality over the visual world is today governed more by system design than by video-specific pretraining, and visual-memory infrastructure can deliver it while keeping playable, source-grounded evidence first-class.
FinRank: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Financial Question Answering and Retrieval over SEC Filings
Financial question answering is typically evaluated by answer correctness, yet in SEC filings a plausible and even numerically correct answer can be grounded in the wrong evidence. Similar facts and disclosures recur across sections of a filing, across reporting periods of the same firm, and across comparable firms. FinRank targets this provenance-sensitive retrieval problem by requiring systems to identify evidence for the intended entity, reporting period, and disclosure context. The benchmark contains 1185 manually authored question-answer records over the 10-K and 10-Q filings of 22 companies. Each record includes a reference answer, gold supporting passages, and hand-curated hard negatives drawn from confusable passages within filings, across reporting periods, and across comparable firms. FinRank evaluates passage retrieval, reranking, and hard-negative discrimination as separately measured tasks. Baseline results demonstrate the difficulty of this setting: among the evaluated systems, even a 7B instruction-tuned embedder reaches only 44.8% Recall@10 on the pooled evidence corpus; sub-billion-parameter encoders gain at most 3.5 points over BM25, a finance-adapted embedder trails BM25 by 9.7 points, and pairwise accuracy falls by 13.0-20.5 percentage points when random negatives are replaced with the curated hard negatives. FinRank provides an evidence-first benchmark for developing financial question answering systems that are not only accurate but also grounded in the correct disclosure.
LitTraceQA: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Grounding and Verification in Scientific Question Answering
Scientific literature is increasingly used as a knowledge source for language models, retrieval-augmented generation systems, and research assistants, but answering research questions from papers requires more than fluent generation. A reliable system must identify the relevant papers, locate the concrete evidence that supports the answer, and produce a response that is faithful to that evidence. We present LitTraceQA, a benchmark for literature-grounded question answering over scientific papers. Given a research question and a metadata pool of papers, a system must return three connected outputs: canonical paper identifiers, supporting evidence locations, and answers in one or more requested formats, including free-form text, multiple-choice answers, and structured tables. LitTraceQA targets evidence types common in scientific reading: tables, figures, text spans, equations or algorithms, and citation contexts. The public development split contains 55 examples, including 26 hidden-source single-paper questions and 29 multi-paper questions, and provides gold papers, evidence annotations, and answers for local validation. We also analyze a larger final annotation collection with 4,978 unique-question records over 4,859 unique gold papers. By evaluating paper retrieval, evidence grounding, and answer accuracy separately, LitTraceQA provides a testbed for scientific QA systems that produce verifiable answers rather than unsupported summaries.
HNR-DAC: Hard-Negative Reranking and Distribution-Aligned Classification for Scientific Claim Verification
Scientific claim verification over a cited paper requires predicting the claim--paper relation and identifying the paragraphs that justify that prediction. This setting poses two linked challenges: within-paper distractors often resemble genuine evidence, while a classifier trained on gold evidence must operate on retrieved evidence at inference. We present HNR-DAC, a two-stage framework that trains each stage on the cases it will actually encounter. Hard-Negative Reranking (HNR) quantifies evidence confusability using a base reranker's scores on non-gold paragraphs and contrasts gold evidence against the most confusable candidates. Distribution-Aligned Classification (DAC) trains on the Top-1 paragraph produced by the same frozen HNR used to construct inference inputs, while HNR's Top-3 paragraph identifiers provide the evidence output. On the NLPCC 2026 Task 10 Track 2, the final configuration obtains 97.21% Hit@3, 95.79% Macro-F1, 94.47% Joint@3, and an average score of 95.13%. The corresponding submission ranks third on the official Track 2 leaderboard while achieving the highest overall Macro-F1 of 93.05%, alongside 70.16% Joint@3 and an average score of 81.61%.
DocMemo: Dynamic Evidence Discovery via Probabilistic Memory-Guided Retrieval for Multi-Modal Document Understanding
Long-document understanding requires locating sparse and heterogeneous evidence across hundreds of pages, yet existing systems remain limited by static retrieval and fragile cross-round memory. Mainstream single-round methods commit to a fixed top- page set at the outset and struggle to recover from early retrieval errors; recent iterative approaches allow multi-round evidence acquisition, but they do not investigate the propagation mechanism of cross-round states, making it difficult to track the dynamic changes in page relevance. To address these limitations, we propose DocMemo, a memory-guided framework that formulates long-document reasoning as dynamic evidence exploration. DocMemo maintains a tri-level retrieval state consisting of Document Schema Memory, Page Belief Memory, and Question Episodic Memory, which respectively capture structural priors, dynamic relevance estimation, and query-specific reasoning trajectories. During reasoning, DocMemo continuously refines cross-round page selection through Bayesian page belief updating with Thompson sampling, spatial proximity propagation, and structure-aware adaptive-granularity evidence access, while supplementing page-level evidence with fine-grained visual regions. Experiments on 3 benchmarks show that DocMemo achieves state-of-the-art performance and validate the efficacy of structured memory and dynamic page belief updating. Code is available at https://github.com/Harrygof/DocMemo.
Factorized Hypothesis Search for Evidence-to-Taxonomy Retrieval
Large-taxonomy retrieval often assumes that the input already expresses the target concept. In many settings, however, the input is indirect evidence, such as a table cell whose meaning depends on its row, column, datatype, and context. We call this mismatch the retrieval readiness gap. Our analysis shows that the current index retrieves the target reliably when its semantics are explicit, while raw evidence often leaves it deep in the ranking. We propose Factorized Hypothesis Search (FHS), which maintains multiple partial interpretations over named semantic dimensions. These hypotheses support structured query rendering, multi-hypothesis retrieval, and dimension-level candidate verification. On both financial taxonomy tagging and CodiEsp clinical coding tasks, FHS achieves the best Recall@1, MRR, and final accuracy among the non-oracle methods. Replacing the factorized hypothesis path with a free-text ensemble causes the largest drop in head-ranking performance, while sequential refinement provides no additional gain over FHS's strong parallel first round.
Fetch-then-Explore: Decoupling Selection from Extraction over a Persistent Workspace for Search Agents
Search agents now answer questions that take dozens of searches to settle, yet how such an agent reads a page has drawn far less attention than how it finds one. Nearly all of them use one of two document interfaces, and both tie a page to the moment it is opened. \emph{Visit-and-read} injects a reading of the page into the message history at fetch time, fixing that reading before the agent knows which fact it will need. Stateful \emph{browsing} instead extracts on demand from the page in hand, but holds one page at a time and releases it as soon as the agent opens another. Either way, a page that turns out to matter many turns later has to be fetched and rendered into context all over again. We propose \textbf{Fetch-then-Explore}, which separates page selection from evidence extraction and keeps what it selects: pages are recorded in a per-question workspace on the filesystem rather than the context window or a transient session, and evidence is pulled from them on demand later. Selection becomes almost free, extraction can wait until the agent knows what to look for and be repeated as its hypothesis sharpens, and pages are not released when the agent moves on, so evidence accumulates across the trajectory. In a unified ReAct harness with fixed search, we compare Fetch-then-Explore against snippet-only, visit-and-read, and browsing baselines on two open-web benchmarks, BrowseComp and WideSearch, across three agent backbones. It leads BrowseComp accuracy at every backbone and generally matches or exceeds the baselines on WideSearch, and a behavioral analysis traces the gains to the workspace's defining move: returning to a page after leaving it, which it does far more than any transient interface, so evidence missed on a first pass can still be recovered later.
Diagnosing Search Behavior and Failure Modes in Long-Horizon Search Agents
Deep search agents answer difficult information-seeking questions by iteratively issuing search queries to gather supporting evidence, but it remains unclear whether and how greater search effort leads to better answers. We study these questions through a trajectory-level diagnosis of long-horizon search agents. Using human-annotated document-level relevance judgments, we evaluate the evidence retrieved at each search step and separate two stages of agent behavior: what evidence an agent retrieves and how effectively it uses that evidence. This distinction further allows us to decompose failures into retrieval gaps, where the necessary evidence is never found, and utilization gaps, where relevant evidence is retrieved but not used correctly. With the retrieval model and evaluation harness held fixed, we compare six agents on BrowseComp-Plus and further validate our findings on BrowseComp with an open-web search API. Across settings, we find that search effort and answer quality are only weakly aligned. Answer accuracy is better correlated with the quality of retrieved evidence, especially cumulative retrieval recall, than with the number of searches or the amount of context consumed. Useful evidence often appears early in the trajectory, yet agents tend to continue searching, producing a long tail of low-yield retrieval steps. At the query level, exploratory reformulations remain useful, but the best-performing agents issue far fewer redundant queries. Overall, by systematically characterizing the search behavior and failure modes of long-horizon search agents, this work points to practical directions for building better deep research systems, including stronger query formulation, more effective evidence selection and context management, and stopping criteria based on whether sufficient supporting evidence has been retrieved.
DocNavRAG: Document-Structured Graph RAG with Stateful Evidence Construction for Complex Document Question Answering
Answering complex questions over large document collections requires assembling complementary evidence across sections and documents. GraphRAG offers structured retrieval but typically uses fixed traversal, while agentic RAG operates over weakly structured interfaces. Our key insight is that agents should navigate document structure within and across documents rather than repeatedly search from scratch. We introduce DocNavRAG, which organizes document hierarchies and cross-region relations into a navigable graph, exposes graph operations for locating, navigating, expanding, and fetching, and maintains an evolving evidence state to guide retrieval until sufficient evidence is collected. Across four long- and multi-document QA benchmarks, DocNavRAG improves answer quality and context sufficiency over the strongest baseline by 7.8% and 17.7% on average.
From Patches to Evidence Balls: Class-Conditioned Evidence Retrieval for Few-Shot Whole Slide Image Classification
Whole slide image (WSI) classification is an evidence-driven task, where diagnostic cues are often sparse, spatially organized, and class-dependent. Existing MIL and vision-language methods aggregate a large pool of patch features into a single global slide representation. Under few-shot supervision, limited slide-level labels make it difficult to learn a reliable aggregation mechanism that organizes sparse local cues into compact and coherent diagnostic evidence. Moreover, a shared slide representation compresses evidence supporting a candidate class and its alternatives into the same feature, limiting class-specific reasoning and interpretability. To address these issues, we propose EviBall, a class-conditioned evidence retrieval framework for few-shot WSI classification. EviBall organizes local patches into Evidence Balls through semantic-spatial assignment and center refinement, yielding compact and spatially coherent evidence units under weak supervision. It then uses task-specific class queries, including language-guided queries for morphology-oriented tasks and molecular-guided queries for molecular endpoint prediction, to retrieve supporting evidence balls and produce class-conditioned evidence representations for direct class-wise prediction. By introducing structured evidence units and task-relevant semantic guidance, EviBall reduces the reliance on learning an unconstrained global aggregation mechanism from scarce slide-level labels. It therefore reformulates few-shot WSI classification as structured evidence retrieval and competition among candidate classes. Extensive experiments across four morphology-oriented and molecular endpoint WSI tasks demonstrate that EviBall consistently outperforms conventional and vision-language MIL baselines under diverse few-shot settings, while providing spatially localized and class-specific evidence for each prediction.
HierDoc: Hierarchical Page-to-Region Evidence Routing for Long-Document Visual Question Answering
Multi-page document visual question answering requires locating sparse evidence at both the page and region levels. Existing approaches typically emphasize one level over the other: page-centric methods focus on page acquisition, with region operations serving mainly as navigation aids, whereas region-centric methods assume that the relevant pages have already been supplied. Consequently, page and region selection remain disconnected rather than forming successive evidence decisions. We propose HierDoc, a hierarchical evidence-routing framework that formulates long-document evidence acquisition as two-stage set prediction from pages to regions. A page policy selects evidence pages from the full document; these pages are then parsed for semantic elements, after which a region policy selects the elements passed to a downstream answer model. Both answer-agnostic policies are optimized with stage-wise GRPO using granularity-specific structured-set rewards. The answer model receives selected full pages together with selected region crops and OCR or table text, preserving global context while emphasizing fine-grained evidence. Across the evaluated benchmarks, HierDoc achieves state-of-the-art or competitive performance among open-weight systems, improving LongDocURL by 16.87% relative to the strongest reported open-weight baseline. Controlled ablations further show that selected regional evidence improves the page-only system in accuracy and F1 by 5.51% and 4.82%, respectively. These results demonstrate the benefit of organizing coarse page routing and fine-grained region routing as successive, separately optimized stages of a unified evidence-acquisition process.
CAER: Conflict-Aware Evidence Routing with Dual Prefix Experts for Multimodal Large Language Models
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal understanding and generation. However, when textual inputs conflict with visual evidence, they still suffer from hallucinations and produce responses inconsistent with visual content. Existing approaches mainly rely on decoding strategies, additional training, verification methods, or prompting techniques, but often lack fine-grained conflict localization and conflict-aware generation. In this work, we propose CAER, a backbone-agnostic framework for visual-language conflict detection and conflict-aware generation. CAER introduces a span-grounded evidence router that transforms claim representations into soft textual queries and retrieves corresponding evidence from frozen visual tokens, enabling fine-grained conflict estimation. Furthermore, we design a dual-prefix expert routing mechanism that learns separate experts for visually supported and contradicted inputs, enabling conflict-aware generation through explicit expert selection. Experiments on the public MMMC benchmark and our newly curated AgriConflict dataset demonstrate that CAER effectively detects visual-language conflicts and improves the reliability of open-source MLLMs without updating their backbone parameters.
AskChem: Claim-Centered Infrastructure for Chemistry Literature Synthesis
Chemistry literature synthesis often requires assembling specific findings scattered across many publications, yet existing literature-search systems primarily return ranked document lists. As a result, scientists and AI agents need to locate relevant information, verify their provenance, and assemble cross-paper answers manually. We present AskChem, a claim-centered infrastructure for cross-paper chemistry search. AskChem changes the unit of retrieval from the paper to the provenance-carrying claim: each paper is converted into atomic, typed claims, each grounded by a source DOI and a verbatim quote or an explicit evidence locator. Over this shared claim store, AskChem exposes complementary structures for search and synthesis: a stabilized faceted taxonomy for hierarchical retrieval and browsing, an evidence graph linking claims through relations, and an exploratory living taxonomy that situates indexed papers under scientific principles. AskChem currently indexes 2.4M claims from 147K papers and provides a web interface, as well as REST, SDK, and MCP access for AI agents. On AskChem-Bench, grounding a GPT-5.5 reader in AskChem yields 100% resolvable DOIs, compared with 88.3% without retrieval, and the highest citation density among five tested systems. AskChem is live at https://askchem.org.
EMBL AI Librarian: Life-Sciences Knowledge Layer for AI Agents
The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans. Every agent needs knowledge, especially in the life-sciences, where agentic pipelines are growing fast. Access to the literature is a crucial part of that need, and resources such as Europe PMC, with over 40M indexed records, are widely used to meet it. Yet these resources were not built for AI agents: they take keywords and complex syntax and return whole papers, so every agent must learn the syntax, issue several searches, and read full papers to find the evidence it needs. We introduce EMBL AI Librarian, a knowledge layer that upgrades the Europe PMC interface for AI agents: an agent asks in natural language and receives evidence that answers it. A single LLM orchestrates the whole knowledge retrieval process: it plans complementary subqueries executed by the live Europe PMC search engine, then reads the selected papers and locates the relevant evidence. We evaluate Librarian across four benchmarks: literature synthesis, claim verification, open-domain question answering, and downstream biology tasks such as protocol questions and sequence manipulation. On ScholarQABench, Librarian improves Citation F1 by more than points over strong recently published baselines. Used as the retrieval layer of an existing claim-verification pipeline, it increases agreement with expert consensus; and on the open-form LitQA2 benchmark, a GPT-5.4 agent scores about points higher when grounded in Librarian than with web search. Overall, our results show that equipping life-science agents with the Librarian knowledge layer improves performance across a range of tasks. We release our code publicly at https://github.com/petroni-lab/librarian
Grounded in Consensus, In Step With Emerging Science: A Consensus-Anchored Multi-Corpus Clinical Chatbot for Long COVID
Long COVID (LC) poses a challenge for clinical decision support because relevant evidence is distributed across sources with different update cycles, evidentiary roles, and levels of clinical maturity. We present a clinician-facing chatbot that organizes four sources within a retrieval-augmented workflow: expert-curated consensus guidance, current PubMed literature, registered interventional trials, and evidence from living systematic reviews. Consensus guidance is always included to frame responses, while the remaining sources are retrieved in parallel when selected by the user. In an exploratory automated evaluation on 50 clinician-facing questions, our chatbot showed comparable mean ratings to OpenEvidence, with numerically higher scores and lower score variability in an LLM-judged comparison.
A New Role for Relevance: Guiding Corpus Interaction in Agentic Search
Relevance is a query-dependent estimate of whether a document or excerpt contains useful evidence. Existing retrieval agents use relevance to select top- content, but document relevance alone cannot localize, compose, or verify the evidence required by complex questions. Direct Corpus Interaction (DCI) enables such fine-grained operations through grep-style exploration, but its relevance-agnostic search can expose useful clues late and delay convergence. Recent advances use relevance to narrow the corpus into a working space for interaction. Once interaction begins, however, relevance still does not directly guide which documents grep searches first or distinguish informative excerpts from a broad set of matches to let LLMs see them first. We introduce the Relevance-Aware RipGrep Search Agent (RARG), which turns relevance into an execution prior for corpus interaction. RARG provides coarse-to-fine relevance guidance: it orders documents for sequential 'ripgrep' traversal to expose globally relevant clues earlier, initializes promising entry points with query-relevant paragraphs, and reranks grep matches to surface informative excerpts that document-level ranking may otherwise obscure. Across challenging browse question answering and reasoning-intensive retrieval, RARG improves the accuracy--efficiency frontier over retrieval-based and direct-interaction agents. These results demonstrate that relevance-aware interaction enables faster and more reliable search convergence.
Do Current Retrievers Cover All the Evidence? A Controlled Study of Conjunctive Cross-Page Retrieval
Finding a long document relevant to a multi-part request is not the same as establishing that it contains every requested piece of evidence. We study this gap for conjunctive document retrieval, where two or three explicit conditions must be supported on different pages of one document. We use n-Clue as a controlled measurement instrument: 1{,}000 queries over 2{,}021 documents pair all-condition golds with naturally occurring documents that satisfy only a subset, and a complete-first success requires a top-10 gold to precede every released subset qrel. Across 70 configurations, condition-wise decomposition improves two dense backbones by 6.8--7.3 points and lexical--visual fusion adds 8.7, while four generic rerankers all reduce Gold-NDCG; these directions replicate on a four-source stress set. Scaling one dense family from 0.6B to 8B changes complete-first success by 0.0 points. The strongest displayed hybrid illustrates the resulting gap: it finds a gold for 81.1% of queries but succeeds complete-first on only 35.8%, and the gap persists across condition count, target length, candidate density, query rendering, and the four-source stress set. Finally, page-aware visual systems surface stored support for every condition on only 5.1--5.3% of queries. These results identify condition coverage, rather than gold discovery alone, as the central bottleneck.
VecTree-RAG: An Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework Combining Vector and Tree Retrieval for Efficiency and Accuracy
Scientific question answering requires a retrieval system to solve two distinct problems: identifying which papers are relevant and locating the supporting evidence within those papers. Conventional retrieval-augmented generation typically addresses both through similarity search over fixed-length passages, flattening document structure and separating scientific claims from their methodological and argumentative context. We present VecTree-RAG, an agentic framework that assigns these tasks to complementary retrieval mechanisms. Vector search ranks compact document and section representations across the corpus, whereas reasoning-guided traversal of source-verified section trees localizes evidence within shortlisted papers. Full text is retained in a page store and exposed progressively only after structural localization. We evaluate VecTree-RAG on 300 QASPER questions, an open-access subset of 54 LitQA2 questions, and 49 multi-document MOSAIC questions. Compared with Dense RAG, reranked Dense RAG, RAPTOR, and Search-o1, VecTree-RAG obtained the highest observed answer score on all three benchmarks, reaching 0.800 LLM-judge correctness on QASPER, 0.925 accuracy on LitQA2, and a 0.547 composite score on MOSAIC. On QASPER, its evidence-page precision was 0.274, compared with 0.046--0.071 for the baselines. LitQA2 ablations further showed that the complete vector--tree architecture required fewer inference tokens than variants without tree navigation or corpus-level vector routing. These results indicate that vector retrieval narrows the corpus-level search space and tree navigation concentrates reading on structurally relevant evidence. Although multi-turn inference remains more expensive than single-call retrieval, VecTree-RAG provides a structure-aware and traceable architecture for scientific literature question answering.
MIRA-Ev:A Benchmark for Granular Evidence Detection and Relational Reasoning in Clinical Exams
Clinical NLP evaluation remains dominated by multiple-choice question answering (MCQA), which scores only final-answer accuracy and cannot detect when a model reaches the correct diagnosis while grounding it in irrelevant, absent, or contradictory evidence. We introduce MIRA-Ev, a clinical argument mining benchmark built on Spanish Médico Interno Residente (MIR) licensing-exam cases, re-annotated by expert clinicians with span-level premises, claims, and directed support/attack relations, and released in parallel Spanish (native), English, and Basque versions, the first clinical argumentation resource in Basque. MIRA-Ev organizes evaluation into a three-tier task hierarchy: evidence sentence retrieval, argumentative component extraction, and relation classification.
Aethel: A Reproducible Graph-Retrieval Framework for Multi-Hop Financial Diligence
Secondary private equity transactions require rapid synthesis of fragmented, unstructured financial disclosures, where critical metrics and their entity anchors are distributed across disjoint documents with limited lexical overlap. We present Aethel, a reproducible framework that combines bipartite Personalized PageRank graph retrieval with a coreference-aware Bipartite Coreference Teleportation layer and an orchestrated specialist-agent architecture. Aethel models corpora as entity-passage graphs and propagates relevance through explicit relational paths to support multi-hop financial diligence. We evaluate the retrieval layer on 200-question samples from the MuSiQue and 2WikiMultiHopQA validation sets, comparing sparse lexical, dense bi-encoder, vanilla graph, and coreference-aware graph retrieval. Aethel achieves HR@5 of 100.0% on 2WikiMultiHopQA and 88.5% on MuSiQue, improving coverage over vanilla graph retrieval while trading off top-rank precision. We also evaluate retrieval over a 4,123-chunk corpus of financial disclosures and find that graph retrieval outperforms dense retrieval on multi-hop recall but does not surpass a strong BM25 baseline at open-corpus scale. The results show that graph-based retrieval offers interpretable multi-hop evidence paths and degrades more gracefully than dense retrieval as corpus size grows, while also demonstrating that its advantage depends strongly on corpus scale and entity-index quality. Code and evaluation artifacts are released for reproducibility.
FinSAgent: Corpus-Aligned Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Evidence-Grounded SEC Filing Question Answering
Financial question answering over U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings requires retrieving and synthesizing heterogeneous evidence dispersed across long, standardized, and highly redundant disclosures. Existing retrieval-augmented and multi-agent systems typically derive retrieval queries directly from the user's question and rank candidates by semantic similarity. Together, these choices create prior-corpus misalignment: a mismatch between model priors and the target filings' structure, terminology, and evidence standards. As a result, query generation misses corpus-specific evidence, while semantic reranking favors topically similar but evidentially invalid false-positive chunks. We propose FinSAgent, an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reframes SEC filing QA as corpus-aligned retrieval planning and corrects both ends with a single principle: inject corpus-side conditioning wherever model priors would otherwise dominate. FinSAgent combines (1) role-specialized agents anchored to the mandated 10-K item structure, (2) database-aware query decomposition that conditions each agent's sub-queries on a lightweight, summary-level view of the local corpus, and (3) multi-path retrieval with a learned feature-gated reranker that separates evidential validity from semantic similarity. Across five offline financial QA benchmarks, FinSAgent improves retrieval coverage and answer correctness over strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines; in a three-arm randomized online experiment with 1,000 anonymous user ratings, it also receives higher scores than baselines.
Evidence Interfaces Shape How Retrieval-Augmented Readers Use Support
In multi-hop RAG evaluation, a top-k answer score can hide two different failures: the retrieval window may drop part of the support chain, or it may contain support in a form the adapted reader does not use well. We call this reader-facing form of retrieved evidence an evidence interface. Using three support-annotated multi-hop QA benchmarks, we compare matched adapted readers trained with raw context, retrieval windows, and gold-support diagnostic renderings. These comparisons distinguish support-availability failures from remaining reader-interface effects. Top-k windows become interpretable only after checking whether the complete annotated support chain survives: when it does, short ranked windows can match or improve over raw context; when it does not, missing support explains much of the loss. Gold support-first improves matched readers; on 2Wiki and MuSiQue, a support-supervised ranker raises coverage and recovers raw-context quality at lower prompt cost, while retaining gold headroom. Support-removal checks further show that the gains rely on exposed evidence, not only answer priors. On support-annotated evaluations, top-k answer scores should therefore be reported together with complete-support coverage.
Presentation, Not Mechanism: A Render Confound in Deprecation-Aware Memory Evaluation
AI systems increasingly retrieve from records that revise themselves: issue threads, encyclopedic histories, policy logs, and long conversations. The challenge is not only finding relevant evidence, but deciding which claims remain in force, which were superseded, and when to abstain. Structured memories promise to solve this with typed edges, temporal updates, and conflict status, yet evaluations often change mechanism and prompt presentation together. We study this as Evidence-State Revision, comparing flat retrieval, coarse edge invalidation, and fine-grained RevisionLedger on 2,907 high-agreement questions from GitHub, multi-repo issue histories, Wikipedia, and DyKnow-style temporal streams. A render-matched control (same layout, deprecation disabled) reveals the central confound: when a value is changed and later restored, RevisionLedger appears to beat a flat baseline by +0.182, but almost all the gain comes from easier presentation; the fine-grained mechanism residual is indistinguishable from zero (+0.021 to +0.025 across two judge families). After presentation is controlled, coarse invalidation is the only mechanism that pays for current-state queries, beating the fine ledger by 0.084; the same query-sufficiency principle says provenance mainly needs retained invalidated evidence, not richer typing. Memory evaluations should hold render fixed, and deprecation-aware systems should deploy the coarsest retained state that covers their queries.
Similar Accuracy, Unequal Evidence: Search APIs as Decision Surfaces for Tool-Using Agents
Search APIs expose ranked snippets, URLs, and metadata on which agents decide whether to answer, search again, or fetch pages. We evaluate these interfaces as decision surfaces on a fixed sample of 100 questions from the 254-question SealQA-Hard subset, using one frozen GPT-5.4 agent, a fixed orchestration harness, and a shared page-fetch backend across Brave, Tavily, and Firecrawl. A Kimi-K2.6 oracle labels visible URL-level evidence; a separate answer audit yields 25, 25, and 26 correct answers out of 100. These counts indicate similar observed accuracy but do not establish equivalence. Under the tested configurations, Brave exposes more pre-fetch support alongside a larger snippet surface; Tavily has a larger rank-1 share among trajectory-pooled supporting observations; and Firecrawl is associated with broader exploration. First-search query-level metrics distinguish support availability from ranking, while contradiction exposure complements contradiction-to-gold ratios. A retrospective oracle union covers 44/100 questions, versus 26/100 for the best individual provider: 18 percentage points of headroom. The observed evidence and action differences motivate evaluating search APIs jointly with agent policy and retrieval budget.
Curated retrieval versus open web search in public AI information services: a coverage-trust trade-off
Public institutions increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to answer citizens' questions, often pairing a curated knowledge base with live web search, yet whether the sources behind these answers can be trusted has received little empirical scrutiny. We report a pre-launch expert evaluation of Evrópuvefur, an independent, government-funded service run by the University of Iceland that answers questions about the European Union, conducted as Iceland prepared for its referendum of 29 August 2026 on whether to resume EU accession talks. Five domain experts produced 551 evaluations of 449 AI-generated answers, scoring each against a seven-criterion quality rubric and, separately, flagging individual cited sources. We compared two retrieval paths: a curated local corpus (RAG) and open web search. In more than a third of the reviewed web-search answers (35%, 65 of 187), at least one cited source was flagged, almost always as untrustworthy or irrelevant; curated sources were flagged far less often and only for being out of date. Web search answered more questions, but at the cost of source quality; the curated corpus was trustworthy yet limited in coverage, and the model declined to respond when it fell short. The citation mix also passed over strong sources: across all 287 web-search answers, the system never cited RÚV, the public broadcaster and the country's most widely used news source. A companion prompt ablation shows how weak prompt-level steering is: a trusted-domain list in the system prompt raised the share of citations to listed domains only from 12% to 21%. Fluency and topical fit did not predict source trustworthiness. We argue that source trustworthiness is a measurable yet largely invisible dimension of information quality in public AI services, and we discuss transparency-oriented responses and their trade-offs.