LLM Agent Harnesses
LLM: Large Language Model
Overview
An LLM agent harness surrounds a language model with the mechanisms needed to act: tool interfaces, control loops, context and memory management, persistent state, and execution environments. Common approaches include ReAct-style loops, explicit workflow graphs, typed tool contracts, sandboxes, and verification or recovery steps; newer systems also adapt harnesses using execution traces, search, or reinforcement learning. Researchers evaluate these systems on coding, web, terminal, scientific, and interactive tasks, measuring not only success but also cost, reliability, and safety. A central tension is how much structure helps: added guidance can improve control and recovery, yet may constrain useful behavior, fail to transfer across models or tasks, or make comparisons hard to interpret without specifying the harness.
Latest papers
389 papers118 papers in the last four weeks, up 103% on the four weeks before. 0.7% of all new papers.
SkillZip: Contract-Preserving Graph Compression for Scalable Agent Skill Libraries
Skill-Use: Can LLMs Actually Use Skills in Agentic Harnesses?
OneDayAgent: Towards a Long-Horizon Harness for Autonomous Agents
Formal Verification of Agentic Systems over Operational Data
Harness-R1: Learning to Edit Executable Runtime Harnesses from Agent Failure Trajectories
Homebot: A Personal AI Agent for Conversational Home Assistance and Automation
Homebot is a locally deployable AI agent for conversational household assistance and automation. It accepts voice and instant-messaging requests through a shared runtime that combines language-model responses with registered tools and task-specific skills. The design separates common request processing from session ownership: messaging history remains scoped to a channel and chat, whereas voice interaction is bounded by wake-word activation. For hands-free use, Homebot combines local wake-word detection, streaming speech recognition and synthesis, and an explicit dialogue-state protocol for ending, following up, or continuing a conversation. Clear channel, tool, and skill contracts support practical customization for household use.LongHorizon-Harness: Advancing Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World Tasks
Towards the Harness of Embodied Agents
HarnessCompass: Guiding Automatic Harness Evolution toward Generalizable and Effective Agent Harnesses
Constructing Executable Analytical Knowledge Representations for Meta-Analysis Synthesis Using an Agentic Harness
GABench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Graph Analysis Tasks
RecSys Factory: Bounding LLM Agent Autonomy to Decision Points in the Industrial Recommender Lifecycle
FinanceHarness: Autonomous Financial Deep Research Framework
Harness-G: A Graph-Structured Harness for Search Agents
DREvo: Distilling Recalibrated Historical Experience for Harness Self-Evolution
Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents: Organization, Evolution, and Sustainability
Living-Harness Is an Interactive-Agent Evolver
Distributing Security Controls Through Harness Engineering
Context Assembly as the Controlled Variable: A Control-Theoretic View of Harness Policies for Frozen LLM Agents
COVENANT: Natural-Language Workflow Compilation for Aligned Agent Execution
CogEEGAgent: Toward Autonomous Cognitive EEG Analysis with Grounded Execution and Selection-Aware Verification
SIREN: Towards End-to-End Extreme-Weather Early Warning with Experience-Grounded LLM Agents
SpecBox: Speculative Sandbox Scheduling for Efficient LLM Agent Serving
JarvisHub: An Open Harness for Canvas-Native Multimodal Creative Agents
Agent Team Work Zone: An Automated, Persistent Workspace for Long-Lived Claude Code Agent Teams
OpenForgeRL: Train Harness-native Agents in Any Environment
Delivery, Not Storage: Cue-Anchored Working Memory as a Harness Property for Coding Agents
HARP: The Human--AI Research Platform
traditional'' interface journeys toward more conversational exchanges. Researchers studying HCI and UI use moderated usability sessions, interviews, surveys, transcript analysis, and static prototypes. However, static prototypes provide limited opportunities to study interaction with live AI systems or systematically control how an LLM behaves across participants and scenarios. Conversation transcripts reveal little about how users formulate, revise, and hesitate over prompts before submission. We designed the Human--AI Research Platform (HARP) for researchers, designers, and anyone who has ever wondered, What if AI did this?' HARP places participants in controlled mock scenarios with live, configurable AI agents. Researchers can control agent prompts, model parameters, response characteristics, and experimental conditions; trigger surveys at predefined moments; and record prompt composition time, response latency, deletions, and keystroke pauses. Planned capabilities include voice, facial expression, gesture, and, where legally and ethically appropriate, emotion analysis. We illustrate HARP through a study examining how technical specificity and response length affect retention of LLM output. By pairing controllable live agents with behavioral and self-report measures, HARP enables systematic testing of how AI design choices affect users.