Medical Image Benchmarks

Background and Objective: Quality control is a prerequisite for whole-slide image analysis, yet the benchmarks on which quality-control methods are compared share four properties that make their reported differences hard to interpret: few independent slides, annotation concentrated in a minority of them, pooled ratio metrics with no closed-form standard error, and a single inherited train/test partition. We propose a reliability protocol for such benchmarks. Methods: The protocol quantifies four sources of variability - test-set sampling, training stochasticity, partition composition, and undocumented preprocessing - a claim is reportable only if it survives all four; three of the four cost minutes of compute. We apply it to an independent reconstruction of a published diffusion-based artifact detector, evaluated on the original 24-slide partition and against a supervised baseline. Results: The method's central mechanism reproduces: the auxiliary contrastive term improves pooled F1 from 0.673 to 0.688 and replicates under a second seed (+0.0156, p = 0.031; +0.0190, p = 0.005), although it acts on pen marking rather than the artifact types cited to motivate it. Its comparative claims do not: differences between design variants, and against the supervised baseline, fall inside the uncertainty of the evaluation. Four of 24 slides carry 70% of scored annotated pixels, giving an effective sample size of 6.2, and the inherited partition sits at the 7th percentile. An unreported tissue-restriction step excludes 41.4% of out-of-focus annotation against 2.6% of air bubble; such a gate is confounded with blur by construction. Conclusions: Small-cohort benchmarks support far weaker conclusions than current reporting implies. The four checks are cheap enough to accompany any evaluation on such a resource and separate reproducible effects from differences the evaluation cannot resolve.

Accurate segmentation of the coronary vessel lumen is a prerequisite for quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaque and perivascular adipose tissue in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Cardiologists rely on semi-automated methods for this task because manual vessel tracing and segmentation are labour-intensive. Although many automated methods have been proposed, their validation remains limited by the lack of large, high-quality publicly available datasets. We provide a new dataset of voxel-wise annotations of the vessel lumen and coronary segments, alongside centerlines, and mesh surfaces for 800 scans from the publicly available ImageCAS dataset. Using this dataset, we benchmark established lumen segmentation methods against inter-observer variability, stratifying performance by disease, image quality, coronary dominance, coronary segment, vessel diameter, and lumen attenuation. These labels allow segmentation accuracy to be described in anatomical and clinical context rather than reported as a single aggregate score. The dataset supports the development and validation of methods for lumen segmentation, plaque and perivascular quantification, and haemodynamic modelling.

Despite rapid advances in MIS, fair and reproducible comparisons of segmentation models remain challenging due to heterogeneous datasets, inconsistent evaluation protocols, and rapidly evolving architectures. In particular, comparisons often implicitly assume that model rankings are invariant to data partitioning, preprocessing, metric aggregation, uncertainty estimation, and computational constraints. The lack of extensible and unified evaluation frameworks further limits systematic investigation of new models, datasets, and training paradigms. We present MEDSEGBENCHMARKER (MSB), a configuration-driven framework for controlled benchmarking of 2D MIS. It integrates duplicate and near-duplicate image detection, group-aware data splitting, YAML study specifications, resumable training, hyperparameter optimization, cross-validation, and checkpoint-based evaluation. Rather than retaining only aggregate performance measures, MSB exports sample- and class-level pixel counts and predictions together with the evaluation context. These elementary artifacts enable post-hoc analyses without repeated inference. We demonstrate MSB in a case study involving three heterogeneous 2D datasets and multiple MIS and general-purpose vision models evaluated at 256- and 512-pixel input resolutions. Reaggregation of identical predictions changes the top-ranked architecture in three of six dataset-resolution settings, despite high rank correlations between aggregation strategies. Increasing input resolution produces model- and dataset-dependent performance gains and losses that must be considered alongside empirically measured inference complexity. These results show that seemingly minor choices in evaluation and experimental setup can affect benchmark conclusions. MSB, available at GitHub, provides a practical and extensible basis for making benchmark conditions and evaluation choices explicit and reproducible.

Reliable evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) and medical vision-language models (Medical-VLMs) requires calibrated confidence, particularly under realistic clinical conditions. However, existing efforts mainly focused on improving accuracy, leaving calibration in the medical domain underexplored. To this end, we propose MVC-Bench, a calibration-centric benchmark for medical image classification with VLMs and Medical-VLMs. MVC-Bench assesses the calibration across three axes: (i) robustness to modality, backbone, and domain shift (ii) effectiveness of calibration strategies and prompt-tuning methods (iii) stability under prompt-template and random-seed variations. The benchmark covers eight different backbones, three medical modalities, including fundus imaging, histopathology, and chest X-ray under in-domain and domain shift settings. It compares post-hoc calibration, train-time calibration, and zero-shot inference methods, together with six prompt-tuning methods. Across more than 1638 controlled experiments, we report accuracy and Expected Calibration Error (ECE) as primary metrics, and further report results with complementary calibration measures, including Maximum Calibration Error (MCE) and Adaptive Calibration Error (ACE). We further investigate the underlying causes of miscalibration in VLMs and Medical-VLMs and propose a simple train-time calibration method, Multi-Class Margin (MCM) regularization, which achieves lowest ECE on 10 out of 12 settings in in-domain and remains competitive under domain shifts. Collectively, MVC-Bench provides a structured evaluation framework and actionable guidance for improving calibration in safety-critical medical workflows.

Reliable clot-volume quantification and subsequent risk assessment in pulmonary embolism depend on precise segmentation of emboli on computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Deep learning models for this task must be trained on accurate voxel-level labels. The three public datasets that provide such labels were annotated under different protocols, and some of their studies contain unlabeled emboli or labels that are discontinuous across slices. This Data Descriptor presents voxel-level pulmonary embolism annotations for 149 of the 166 studies in these datasets. A primary rater drew all annotations under a single protocol. A thoracic radiologist with more than 20 years of experience reviewed and revised them. Three raters at three different centers independently annotated a subset of 15 studies. The subset was selected by source dataset and embolus location. Technical validation quantifies volumetric agreement with the source annotations, changes in within-mask attenuation, and inter-rater agreement on the subset. The dataset is intended to allow segmentation models to be developed and compared under a common reference standard.

Corrupted, inconsistent, or anomalous data silently threatens the safety and reliability of medical AI. Despite growing regulatory recognition of dataset quality assurance (QA) for high-risk medical AI, scalable automated detection remains underdeveloped. We employ unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection as an automated dataset QA mechanism for multi-center dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. We build a controlled AD benchmark of 17 realistic QA-relevant anomaly types from six public datasets (protocol violations, processing errors, incorrect anatomical regions) and propose a taxonomy of radiological image anomalies based on human visual perception, enabling fine-grained analysis of AD failure modes. The benchmark includes near-, medium-far-, far-OOD samples, as well as in-distribution and external normal data. Four methods are evaluated: a projection-based method extended with a domain-specific feature extractor and a novel positional encoding, a reconstruction-based approach extended to full 3D volumes with an augmented training objective, and two unmodified hybrid OOD detection methods. Medium-far- and far-OOD samples are detected reliably, whereas near-OOD samples and external normal data from unseen institutions expose method-specific differences. The 3D reconstruction-based approach best balances detection performance (AUROC: 0.936) and generalization to unseen institutions. The projection-based method with positional encoding achieves the highest overall detection performance (AUROC: 0.954). Both hybrid methods exhibit critical failure modes, confirming that methods validated for one modality or anatomy may not generalize without domain-specific adaptation. Implants and mastectomies remain an open challenge for all methods. Our results establish a foundation and practical guidance on scalable unsupervised QA in medical AI pipelines.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) interpretation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, requiring radiologists to integrate multi-view anatomical planes across sequential timepoints while precisely localizing interval changes. However, existing vision-language benchmarks remain confined to single-timepoint, single-view interpretation, failing to capture the temporal-spatial reasoning essential to radiologic practice. We introduce the Time-Aware Multi-View MRI Benchmark, an evaluation framework unifying multi-view anatomical input, temporal reasoning across longitudinal scans, and structured localization guidance. The benchmark comprises 3,920 expert-verified question-answer pairs derived from 890 patients across over 3,200 longitudinal MRI timepoints, drawn from seven clinical cohorts covering glioblastoma, neurodegeneration, vestibular schwannoma, and brain metastases, in open-ended, multiple-choice, and binary formats, requiring models to identify anatomical regions of maximal change, characterize progression across sequences and views, and provide structured guidance specifying boundaries, imaging features, and confounders. Experiments across 16 vision-language models reveal moderate temporal alignment but systematic failure on change direction recognition and volumetric quantification, while multi-view inputs improve spatial localization yet degrade temporal reasoning in compact architectures. Our benchmark provides a systematic framework for evaluating progression tracking, interval change localization, and temporal ordering, which are essential for clinical deployment. Code, evaluation splits, and the dataset are available at: https://github.com/wafaAlghallabi/Time-Aware-MRI.

We introduce a Polish-language medical visual question answering (VQA) benchmark, built from Polish Board Certification Examination questions for licensed physicians and dentists pursuing specialist certification. The benchmark comprises image-containing questions spanning diverse medical specialties and visual domains, together with a text-only question answering (QA) control set. We evaluate Polish-oriented, general-purpose open-weight, and commercial vision-language models. The task remains challenging: the best model achieves 79.0% accuracy on the full VQA set, and only GPT-5.6 surpasses the approximate human reference on the subset with available candidate responses; all other evaluated models perform worse than humans. To assess visual grounding, we compare complete inputs with configurations omitting the image, the question, or both, and categorize questions by image importance. Models derive more useful information from the question text than from the image and perform worse on image-dominant questions. Across both QA and VQA, they nevertheless achieve above-chance accuracy from the answer choices alone, showing that non-trivial performance can persist even when key task components are missing.

Alzheimer's disease is a leading cause of death with no cure. Therefore, early detection is critical to slow progression and preserve quality of life. Diagnosis relies on medical history, cognitive tests, physical exams, and MRI brain scans, making deep learning suitable for Alzheimer's classification. This work proposes a benchmark that evaluates ten different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures (including ResNet, DenseNet, MobileNet, EfficientNet, and VGG family models) under the same held-out test split protocol. A two-stage transfer learning and full fine-tuning pipeline is introduced to perform training using a class-balanced subset (3,900 images) derived from the OASIS medical imaging dataset, comprising 86,437 single-view MRI brain scans labeled into four classifications of Alzheimer's disease: Non-Demented, Very Mild Dementia, Mild Dementia, and Moderate Dementia. The best results were achieved by VGG16, with a 0.9637 validation accuracy and a 0.9533 test accuracy score. A key finding documented in this work is the difficulty of classifying the transition from Non-Demented to Very Mild Demented stages, observed consistently across all ten architectures.

In medical imaging, the clinical value of Computed Tomography (CT) lies not only in depicting current disease status, but crucially in enabling longitudinal comparison of serial scans to determine disease evolution, a process that underpins response assessment, recurrence detection, and ongoing patient management. Yet, despite this central role of temporal comparison in clinical decision-making, existing medical foundation models remain largely confined to single-study understanding, leaving temporally grounded cross-examination insufficiently addressed. To address this gap, we study longitudinal imaging difference reporting, a task in which a model takes two temporally separated scans from the same patient and generates a clinically meaningful report describing interval changes between them. We introduce CT-$Δ$Bench, a dedicated benchmark for this task with patient-level splitting to prevent information leakage. To better evaluate this task beyond surface-level text similarity, we further develop change-aware metrics specifically designed to capture clinically meaningful longitudinal changes, and conduct an independent physician validation to assess the reliability of the synthesized references and event extraction pipeline. We also compare direct paired-CT reasoning with an indirect two-stage pipeline that first generates single-timepoint reports and then performs textual differencing. Finally, we propose DeltaMed, a baseline model for direct paired-CT difference reporting, and train it on the benchmark training set. Together, these contributions lay the groundwork for temporally aware medical foundation models that better reflect real-world longitudinal clinical reasoning.

Breast density classification is a critical component of breast cancer risk assessment, yet AI models often struggle to generalize across clinical sites due to vendor-specific acquisition styles. In this work, we introduce two new datasets, BreastMammo and DenseMammo, to facilitate robust multi-view mammography research. We propose a domain generalization framework that utilizes a foreground-only histogram matching protocol to resolve the domain shift issue arising from disparate clinical sources. Internal evaluation using a 5-fold cross-validation protocol demonstrates the efficacy of our approach, with the Swin Transformer backbone achieving a peak AUC of 98.32% for density classification. External evaluation on the TNMammo and LUMINA datasets demonstrates that the proposed approach consistently reduces domain shift, significantly outperforming prominent domain generalization paradigms, including MixStyle and Discrete-Fourier-Transform-based frameworks.

Recent advances in machine learning have greatly improved breast cancer detection, enabling more accurate and timely diagnosis. Deep learning (DL) models show strong potential for medical image analysis; however, as their architectural complexity increases, their environmental impacts are becoming a growing concern. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of seven DL models for breast cancer detection on two medical datasets: Breast Ultrasound and BreakHis 400X. The evaluated architectures range from Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers to hybrid models. In addition to performance metrics, we assess CO2 emissions during both training and inference. Our results show that EfficientNet and ResNet consistently deliver strong performance, although with higher CO2 emissions. The selected transformers, such as DeiT-Tiny, perform competitively on both datasets, whereas DenseNet121 achieves lower accuracy. On the Breast Ultrasound Dataset, DeiT provides the most favourable balance between accuracy and energy consumption, whereas on the BreakHis dataset, the ViT and Swin models achieve the best results. Overall, our findings indicate that no single architecture category from the evaluated ones consistently dominates across the two selected datasets. Our results highlight the importance of jointly considering performance, emissions, and dataset characteristics when selecting models for medical applications.

Routine CT interpretation is inherently comprehensive, capturing incidental findings across the entire scan volume. 3D CT foundation models could assist this process by providing generalizable representations of anatomy and pathology. To evaluate their diagnostic breadth, we benchmark ten frozen CT encoders across three cohorts of thoracic CT scans, including an unseen internal clinical dataset, using $k$-nearest neighbors, zero-shot prompting, and linear probing. We find no universal state-of-the-art, with rankings fluctuating significantly depending on the evaluation context. While models combining fine-grained image tokenization with vision-language alignment generally perform best, a lightweight supervised encoder remains highly competitive, demonstrating that explicit labels can effectively substitute for scale. Crucially, rather than model architecture, we observe that the primary determinant of performance is a physical bottleneck: a finding's detectability scales with its contrast against surrounding tissue and its spatial extent. Through controlled within-organ comparisons, we empirically demonstrate that widespread or high-contrast abnormalities, such as devices and effusions, are reliably recovered. Conversely, small, low-contrast focal lesions remain a persistent challenge across all evaluated encoders. We attribute this to the inherent limitations of globally pooled embeddings, suggesting that accurately representing small, low-contrast structures will require region- or lesion-level pretraining.

A large number of infants with congenital anomalies are born each year globally, especially in areas with underdeveloped medical resources. Currently, fetal ultrasound screening is the most common modality for early pregnancy anatomy detection. This modality can detect anomalies earlier and provide opportune treatment advice. However, the lack of an ultrasound dataset on early fetal gestation has slowed down the development of automated assisted diagnosis. In this work, we present a benchmark dataset for Fetal Ultrasound Screening in Early Pregnancy to facilitate intelligent ultrasound examination and assisted diagnosis called FUSEP. Our dataset consists of two ultrasound views recommended by the international guideline, i.e., Crown-rump Length (CRL) and Nuchal Translucency (NT) views in three hospitals, totaling 4,017 ultrasound images, with 45,820 box-level expert-level annotations. Our dataset and baseline present the following three contributions: 1) Our medical experts annotated a total of 14 key anatomical structures in two views using a box-level format; 2) Our data is collected extensively from different sonographers, devices, scanning angles, hospitals, etc; 3) We report the performance of the semi-supervised learning, fully supervised learning, unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA), and source-free UDA in ultrasound images multi-object detection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first publicly available dataset and benchmark for fetal early pregnancy ultrasound screening. We believe that FUSEP and benchmark can contribute to the medical community in the development of multiple tasks such as standard plane recognition, quality control on ultrasound images, automated assisted diagnostics in early fetal pregnancy, medical multi-object detection, domain adaptation for object detection, etc.

Medical visual grounding connects free-form clinical queries to spatial evidence in medical images and is an important component of interpretable medical artificial intelligence. However, general-purpose grounding models are predominantly trained on natural images, while existing medical localization resources remain fragmented across imaging modalities, datasets, and task formulations. To address this gap, we construct LocAnyMed-200K, a multimodal medical visual grounding dataset containing approximately 200K image-query-answer examples across computed tomography, optical medical imaging, ultrasound, and X-ray. We harmonize heterogeneous detection and localization resources into a unified free-form instruction format that supports one or multiple bounding boxes, point coordinates, and no-target outputs for negative queries. Full-parameter fine-tuning of LocateAnything-3B on LocAnyMed-200K improves F1@IoU 0.50 from 10.64 to 85.59 on a held-out evaluation split, demonstrating that large-scale domain-specific supervision can equip a general grounding model with effective medical localization capabilities. Beyond spatial coordinates, a clinically interpretable grounding system should also communicate the evidence supporting its prediction. We therefore derive LocAnyMed-CoT-20K, a rationale-augmented subset that connects anatomical context, visual observations, and spatial conclusions through structured reasoning and further improves cross-source generalization through fine-tuning. Together, these resources provide a unified foundation for studying both localization accuracy and rationale quality across heterogeneous medical imaging modalities. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/MiliLab/LocAnyMed.

Federated learning enables medical-imaging models to be trained across hospitals, and privacy law, most explicitly the GDPR ``right to be forgotten'', turns removing a hospital's, a class's, or a patient's influence from such a model into a federated unlearning problem. This need is most acute in medicine, where patients withdraw consent and hospitals leave collaborations. Yet nearly all unlearning evidence comes from natural images, whose heterogeneity and task structure differ sharply from clinical data, so it is unclear whether existing methods transfer, and no shared protocol covers clinical data. We present Lethe, a benchmark for federated unlearning in medical imaging. It evaluates twelve methods across eight task families, from classification and segmentation to denoising, cross-modality synthesis, and vision-language question answering, at three forgetting granularities and against a retrained gold standard on utility, privacy, and cost. The central result is that what separates methods is the difficulty of the forgetting request, not the method itself. The easy removals that dominate the literature leave the methods that preserve utility indistinguishable, while only hard ones separate them. More striking, on the many medical tasks that generalize across sites, forgetting a client barely changes task performance, leaving residual membership as the signal that must be erased.

Medical image quality plays a critical role in diagnostic accuracy, especially in X-ray-based imaging modalities such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), where image quality must be balanced against radiation dose. While expert visual evaluation remains the clinical standard for image quality evaluation, it is time-consuming, subjective and affected by inter-observer variability, emphasizing the need for reliable quantitative image quality assessment (IQA) methods. However, the development and validation of such IQA methods have been limited by the lack of publicly available CBCT datasets with expert image quality annotations. In this study, we provide the first open-access CBCT IQA dataset containing 1,764 annotated image slices acquired using systematic variations in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Three clinical experts graded the overall image quality and a predefined regions of interest (ROI) using a four-level scoring scheme. In addition, we benchmark 26 full reference- and no reference-based IQA measures against expert annotations and introduce an exploratory IQA measure-based ranking capable of distinguishing subtle image quality differences. This dataset introduced a standardized benchmark for future CBCT IQA research and provides a valuable resource for the development and validation of new IQA methods, enabling reproducible research and advancing CBCT IQA.

Automatic brain tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a fundamental task in computer-assisted diagnosis, treatment planning, and disease monitoring. Although numerous deep learning architectures have recently been proposed, objective comparisons remain challenging because published studies often employ different datasets, preprocessing strategies, training protocols, and evaluation procedures. This work presents a unified experimental benchmark for comparing representative convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Transformer-based models, and recent State Space Model (SSM) architectures under homogeneous experimental conditions. Five state-of-the-art three-dimensional segmentation models, including 3D U-Net, SegResNet, Swin UNETR, SegMamba, and SegMambaV2, are evaluated on two brain tumor segmentation datasets representing distinct clinical scenarios: intracranial meningioma segmentation (BraTS 2023) and post-treatment glioma segmentation (BraTS 2024). All architectures are trained using identical preprocessing, data augmentation, optimization strategies, and evaluation protocols to ensure a fair comparison. Performance is assessed using segmentation accuracy metrics together with computational cost indicators, including inference time and the size of each model. The results provide practical insights into the trade-offs between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency, highlighting the suitability of different architectural paradigms for challenging three-dimensional brain tumor segmentation tasks.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being evaluated for medical imaging, but many available benchmarks emphasize disease classification, report generation, or broad visual question answering rather than the spatial and anatomical reasoning required for radiology. We developed the Spatial Perception and Anatomical Reasoning in Clinical Radiology (SPARC-Rad) Benchmark, a manually curated multimodal benchmark dataset and evaluation pipeline for assessing these capabilities in radiology VLMs. SPARC-Rad includes 300 image-question pairs derived from healthy control imaging studies in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), spanning CT, MRI, and radiography across the abdomen, chest, breast, neuro, and musculoskeletal categories. Radiology trainees manually designed and annotated questions to evaluate anatomical identification, localization, laterality, regional recognition, device identification, and inter-structure spatial relationships. The evaluation pipeline supports standardized prompting, structured output collection, response normalization, LLM-as-judge grading, human quality review, binary correctness scoring, and subgroup analysis by modality, anatomy, and reasoning type. SPARC-Rad provides a reusable framework for evaluating whether VLMs can provide reasoning for radiologic anatomy as a spatial system, supporting future model development, failure-mode analysis, and pre-deployment assessment.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to analyze pathology images. However, dominant multimodal benchmarks in pathology mainly score final diagnostic answers, captions, or reports. These evaluations provide limited insight into whether a model understands the multiscale visual content needed for pathology reasoning and decision-making. We introduce PathVU, a vision-anchored benchmark for fine-grained and multiscale visual understanding in computational pathology. Built from 23 public pathology imaging datasets with human-supervised labels and spatial annotations, PathVU evaluates MLLM understanding in two fields of view: Region FOV for high-resolution local regions and Slide FOV for macro whole-slide views. By converting raw annotations into deterministic task targets, PathVU enables programmatic scoring of region localization, visual recognition, quantity estimation, spatial reasoning, and insufficient-context judgment. The benchmark contains 14 VQA-style tasks, 61,673 images, and 308,070 samples across 28 organs and 7,253,526 annotations. Evaluating 18 representative general-purpose, medical-domain, and pathology-oriented MLLMs, we observe substantial limitations even in advanced models on fine-grained visual tasks across multiscale pathology images. PathVU provides a reproducible basis for developing and evaluating pathology MLLMs with explicit multiscale visual understanding.

Few-shot medical image segmentation (FS-MIS) aims to segment novel regions of interest (ROIs) from a few annotated support examples. Despite rapid progress, existing FS-MIS solutions span diverse paradigms but are evaluated under inconsistent settings, leaving their relative effectiveness unclear. We introduce FAME, a unified benchmark for evaluating FS-MIS solutions, covering specialists, SAM-based methods, CLIP-based methods, and MLLM-based methods. FAME contains 14,958 test samples across 7 anatomical sites, 9 imaging modalities, and 14 ROI categories, and evaluates models under zero-shot and ten-shot settings with additional assessment of target-absence recognition and generalization under covariate and semantic shifts. Our evaluation reveals several findings. First, effective few-shot segmentation depends on how models exploit support examples: direct visual adaptation generally outperforms prompt-based strategies. Second, increasing support examples improves performance only when models can effectively utilize them. Third, semantic transfer remains substantially more challenging than imaging-domain adaptation, and strong localization ability does not necessarily imply reliable target-absence recognition. We hope FAME provides a comprehensive understanding of current FS-MIS solutions and facilitates the development of more effective and reliable few-shot medical segmentation methods.

In clinical practice, patients often undergo multiple imaging examinations over successive visits, yielding longitudinal data. Modeling such temporal information is crucial for reliable assessment of disease progression and treatment response. However, despite the rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), longitudinal medical visual reasoning remains largely underexplored. To fill this gap, we propose LoMeVQA, a comprehensive benchmark consisting of 206K longitudinal visual question answering (VQA) pairs for temporal medical image analysis. LoMeVQA covers five tasks: progress classification, progress description, progress report generation, differential region grounding, and differential region description. To construct the dataset, we develop an automated pipeline that (1) organizes patient records chronologically, (2) extracts clinically meaningful entities via a medical knowledge graph, and (3) models their temporal evolution to guide large language models in generating high-quality longitudinal VQA pairs. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that both general-purpose and medical-domain MLLMs perform poorly on LoMeVQA, revealing substantial limitations in temporal reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce MedLong-8B, which achieves state-of-the-art performance across all tasks. Beyond benchmarking, we conduct detailed analyses that uncover key failure modes and shed light on how to improve longitudinal medical visual reasoning. Our data is available at: https://github.com/pepperbubble/LoMeVQA

Large chest radiography archives are difficult to search because most studies are paired only with free-text reports rather than structured clinical annotations. Vision-language models offer a natural interface for text-to-image retrieval, but current biomedical models are primarily optimized for report-to-image matching rather than for satisfying short clinical search queries. This creates an objective mismatch: a model may retrieve images related to words in the query while failing to satisfy the full clinical constraint, especially for conjunctions and negations such as ``atelectasis and no pneumonia.'' We introduce CXR-Retrieve, a structured benchmark for compositional chest X-ray text-to-image retrieval. The benchmark contains 5,159 test images from the official test-split of MIMIC-CXR-JPG and 145 textual queries spanning single and conjunction findings, both positive and negative. Relevance is defined by whether a retrieved image satisfies all asserted pathology constraints, rather than by whether it matches a paired report. We further propose a label-aware contrastive fine-tuning objective for clinical retrieval. Our method attracts image-text pairs with compatible asserted pathology constraints, including shared confirmed absences, while explicitly repelling contradictory pairs. Starting from the in-domain CXR-CLIP checkpoint, our method improves Precision@5 over CXR-CLIP by 8.5 percentage points on two-pathology conjunctions and by 22.0 percentage points on negation queries. These results show that reliable chest X-ray retrieval requires training objectives that model not only which findings are mentioned, but also how they are clinically asserted.

We describe the DS@GT submissions to the ImageCLEFmedical Caption 2026 challenge, which continues a long-running benchmark on the ROCOv2 dataset with two tracks: Concept Detection (Task 1), assigning UMLS Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs) to radiology images, and Caption Prediction (Task 2), generating natural-language captions. For Task 1, our primary submission was a three-way late-fusion ensemble of ConvNeXt-V2, BiomedCLIP ViT-B/16, and DenseNet-169 with a regularized ''Honest Threshold Tuning'' procedure designed to avoid validation overfitting on rare concepts; this submission ranked first on the official submission with a primary $F_1$ of $0.5790$ and a secondary $F_1$ of $0.9657$. In parallel, we submitted a training-free KNN retrieval pipeline over frozen BiomedCLIP embeddings, which reached a primary $F_1$ of $0.5780$ and a secondary $F_1$ of $0.9599$-essentially matching the fine-tuned ensemble on the primary track at a fraction of the cost. For Task 2, our submissions included a fine-tuned Gemma-3 27B model (overall $0.3571$, ranking third in the official submission), a fully fine-tuned BLIP pipeline with custom Vizwins merging ($0.3564$), and a zero-shot MedGemma-4B run with a PubMed-style prompt ($0.3186$), spanning a wide range of model scales and training costs. Code: https://github.com/dsgt-arc/imageclef-caption-2026.

Accurate evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in dental panoramic radiography (orthopantomogram, OPG) is limited by the lack of fine-grained, clinically reliable benchmarks that reflect expert interpretation. This work introduces PanDent, a large-scale, clinically grounded OPG benchmark built upon fine-grained, expert-validated tooth-level annotations. The dataset comprises 9,524 high-quality OPGs, each associated with comprehensive structured annotations produced by experienced dentists and further validated by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist, providing clinically reliable supervision for tooth-level diagnosis and reasoning. Clinically consistent radiology reports are constructed from expert-validated findings using clinician-defined reporting logic, establishing explicit correspondence between structured clinical evidence and free-text descriptions. This design enables evaluation of whether MLLMs generate reports that are not only linguistically coherent but also clinically consistent with expert-validated tooth-level findings. Experiments are conducted on diverse MLLMs, including state-of-the-art (SOTA) proprietary models, general-domain open-source models, and medical-specific models. Results show that current MLLMs can generate fluent reports, yet fail to produce clinically consistent descriptions, exhibiting substantial errors in fine-grained localization and tooth-level diagnosis. Fine-tuning on PanDent significantly improves structure-language consistency, substantially enhancing visual localization accuracy and diagnostic correctness, and bringing model outputs closer to expert dental interpretation. These results establish PanDent as a rigorous benchmark for evaluating tooth-level clinical reasoning in MLLMs and a valuable resource for clinically grounded dental AI.

Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment. However, commonly used report-derived labels for pathology classification or generic image quality metrics for reconstruction may not reliably reflect clinical judgment. We systematically investigate how evaluation-reference choices affect model performance and ranking in both pathology classification and image quality assessment (IQA). To enable controlled comparison across evaluation references, we collected paired expert image- and report-derived labels for thoracic findings from a clinical cohort at Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH) and curated a subset of the public MIMIC-CXR dataset, along with expert ratings of diagnostic image quality. We show that for supervised image classifiers (ResNet, DenseNet), several zero-shot and fine-tuned vision-language models (e.g., MedKLIP, GLoRIA, and ConVIRT), changing the label source leads to substantial differences not only in performance estimates but also in model rankings. In parallel, alignment of IQA measures with expert judgment depends heavily on the choice of measure, and commonly used IQA metrics such as SSIM and PSNR often fail to align with expert assessments of diagnostic usability. Our results demonstrate that evaluation choices are crucial: they can determine which models and methods appear best and are therefore selected for further development or deployment. The selection of evaluation references should therefore be treated as a central component of clinical validity in CXR machine learning, and justified with respect to the pathology, imaging task, and intended downstream clinical use.

Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases. Agreement across these artifacts is usually assumed rather than tested. We performed a retrospective forensic reproducibility audit of a preserved chest-radiograph vision-language model (VLM) pilot; no model was called again and no image or report was newly annotated. We traced prompt bindings, DICOM metadata, output completeness, label extraction, matched analyses, and release propagation. Of 300 planned model-prompt calls, 297 yielded nonempty reports. Sixty Claude calls labeled A/B were executed with the same C prompt. The 30 studies represented 28 patients. Four MONOCHROME1 images were rendered without required polarity inversion, dataset split membership was not retained, and the unvalidated extractor truncated five reports to 4000 characters. Reconstructing one common cohort of 369 complete case-finding blocks changed Cochran's Q from 154.73 to 182.29. Of 45 McNemar comparisons, 27 had unadjusted p < 0.05 and 20 remained below 0.05 after Holm adjustment. These values describe only the archived automated-label matrix; they do not recover the intended prompt comparison or establish clinical performance. We withdraw the original performance, ranking, prompt-effect, and clinical claims and specify machine-verifiable controls for cohort, DICOM rendering, prompt and model identity, call status, annotation provenance, keyed analysis, and derived artifacts.

Pathological diagnosis is inherently multi-scale, requiring the integration of global tissue architecture at low magnification with cellular morphology at higher magnification. However, existing pathology benchmarks and vision-language models (VLMs) are still largely developed under single-scale settings, limiting their ability to learn clinically meaningful multi-magnification reasoning. Moreover, naively constructed visual question answering (VQA) tasks may be susceptible to text-only or superficial visual shortcuts, leading to unreliable assessments of visual understanding. To address these limitations, we introduce a benchmark and training framework for shortcut-resistant cross-scale pathology reasoning. We design an Adversarial Text-only Screening strategy for semantic reasoning questions and a Structure-controlled Distractor Sampling strategy for visual grounding questions, encouraging models to rely on cross-scale visual evidence. Based on this pipeline, we construct PathScale-VQA, a high-quality cross-scale pathology VQA benchmark with 10,373 multiple-choice questions grounded in 1,368 diagnostic paths across multiple magnification levels. Building on the semantic reasoning set, PathScale-R1 is optimized through Difficulty-driven Reasoning Distillation supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning with a Scale-aware Reasoning Structure reward, which encourages the use of evidence across magnifications. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance of PathScale-R1 on cross-scale reasoning tasks and effective transfer to conventional single-scale pathology VQA. Our code is available at https://github.com/iMVR-PL/PathScale-R1.

Medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly expected to perform complex image understanding tasks, yet their reliability is often compromised by frequent errors in visual interpretation. To systematically trace these failures, we traverse the hierarchy from high-level clinical tasks down to fundamental visual perception. We therefore introduce Perception-Bench, a large-scale benchmark comprising 1.13 million samples that assesses medical MLLMs across six dimensions: attribute judgment, spatial grounding, spatial understanding, disease prediction, anomaly detection, and report generation, spanning both 2D and 3D radiology images. Our analysis on Perception-Bench reveals that existing MLLMs lack the ability to capture even the most basic lesion attributes, such as location, size, and density. This inability to ground clinical outputs in primary visual evidence reveals that the models' diagnostic unreliability is rooted in a critical but overlooked bottleneck in low-level visual perception. Motivated by this, we propose RadSight, a perception-driven MLLM built upon a dual 2D/3D encoder architecture that preserves native imaging spatial structures. RadSight formulates medical image understanding as a four-stage progressive process: visual-language alignment, fine-grained visual perception, clinical diagnosis, and diagnostic interpretation. The model is trained on an 8.37 million perception-oriented corpus using progressive curriculum learning. On Perception-Bench, RadSight consistently outperforms existing MLLMs across all six evaluation dimensions, with particularly strong gains in spatial grounding and clinical diagnosis. It also achieves consistent improvements on public 2D and 3D medical benchmarks, further demonstrating that robust low-level visual perception is a critical foundation for reliable clinical understanding. Code and model will be publicly available.

Accurate pixel-level classification of coronary angiograms is critical for cardiovascular disease assessment, yet the field lacks standardized evaluation protocols. In this work we demonstrate a new benchmark for the assessment of deep learning models which densely classify pixels of coronary angiograms to one of SYNTAX classes (or background). The evaluation covers 24 distinct architectures starting with classic convnets to recent state-space-based vision algorithms. We release CARDIAG - a multi-center, multi-label dataset which we carefully split to reliably compute metrics, accounting for diameter error, overlap, centerline quality and calibration. The data contains SYNTAX labels, binary, uncertainty and segmentation masks as well as intermediate frames together with the selected non-sensitive DICOM metadata. From the multitude of algorithms, we nominate ConvNeXt V2 encoder with DeepLab V3 Plus decoder as the best performing, achieving macro $F_1=0.456$, which we then ensemble with Mamba U-Net and Feature Pyramid Network, for an increased $F_1=0.479$. We demonstrate all the architectures to be well calibrated and determine the generalization of the top 5 methods, together with the data efficiency of these architectures. We highlight the importance of both high-resolution and low-resolution features in encoding. We also demonstrate the model correctness in the context of patient demographic, vessel sides and projection angle configurations. Overall the released benchmark allows for future studies to robustly and rigorously assess the proposals, not only for SYNTAX segmentation, but lesion detection and many more.