Multimodal Reasoning

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

39 papers in the last four weeks, up 70% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 314

Jun 30, 2026cs.CV

Token-Sparse Medical Multimodal Reasoning via Dual-Stream Reinforcement Learning

Vision-language models (VLMs) combining reinforcement learning (RL) ignite remarkable progress in multimodal reasoning, yet still struggle with medical images, which typically exhibit extremely sparse visual evidence to inform clinical decision-making. We recognize that pruning visual tokens outside the grounding region greatly enhances medical reasoning. However, a united RL framework for active visual token pruning (VTP) and medical multimodal reasoning remains unestablished. Here, we propose a dual-stream RL framework, ViToS, to fulfill token pruning and question answering. ViToS trains one policy model with two task branches, where one focuses on grounding while the other conducts token-sparse reasoning after VTP. Furthermore, we solve the coupled policy learning problem by introducing the cross-feedback sequential optimization, avoiding gradient conflict and facilitating convergence of the shared policy model. Evaluated on seven medical benchmarks, our method reduces visual tokens to 77% of the original sequence length while achieving a 108.27% relative performance on Lingshu-7B and 104.16% relative performance on HuatuoGPT-Vision-7B. Overall, ViToS delivers superior performance and inference speedup, establishing an efficient paradigm for medical multimodal reasoning.

Kaitao Chen, Weiqian Zhao, Jiamin Wu +6

1Fudan University · 2Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · 3Shanghai Jiao Tong University +1

Efficient Multimodal Inference Medical VQA Multimodal Reasoning Medical VLMs Visual Token Pruning RL for VLMs+1

Jun 30, 2026cs.AI

Modality-Driven Search with Holistic Trace Judging for ARC-AGI-2

Large language models can produce fluent, internally coherent reasoning traces for abstract reasoning tasks while still being confidently wrong - making selection among candidates, not just generation, the central challenge. I present a solver for ARC-AGI-2, a few-shot visual reasoning benchmark, built around two principles: (i) treating reasoning modalities as search operators, generating diverse candidates independently across text, image, and code channels, and (ii) context-preserving holistic judging, in which a judge model jointly compares all candidate reasoning traces within a single long-context prompt. Unlike self-consistency or majority voting, this approach reliably recovers correct minority hypotheses on tasks where the modal answer is wrong. On the ARC Prize semi-private evaluation set, the solver achieves 72.9 percent at USD 38.99 per task - the highest score on the verified leaderboard at the time of writing, exceeding the best standalone frontier models, GPT-5.2 Pro at 54.2 percent and Gemini 3 Pro at 54.0 percent, by +18.7 percentage points. On the public evaluation set, it achieves 76.1 percent at USD 19.69 per task. I release the full source code and document extensive negative results, including the finding that prescriptive prompting templates and iterative refinement systematically reduce hypothesis diversity and degrade performance.

Johan Land

Independent Researcher

Visual Reasoning Multimodal Reasoning ARC-AGI Multimodal CoT Reasoning

Jun 30, 2026cs.AI

Spatial Reasoning via Modality Switching Between Language and Symbolic Representations

Human reasoning is inherently multimodal: when problems become difficult, we rarely think in words alone. We often externalize our reasoning by sketching diagrams or drawing grids to understand the underlying conceptual structure and avoid mistakes. Building on this premise, our research investigates: (a) whether grounding multi-hop textual-spatial stories into geometry-aware modalities, such as layouts or grids, improves reasoning compared to natural language-based inference; and (b) whether a model can decide when to rely on natural language reasoning and when to switch to a structured modality. We address these questions by introducing a switching metric based on trustworthiness and complexity signals, which estimates when grounding a spatial story into structure is likely to improve performance. This takes a first step toward principled modality selection in Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning. Across our settings, switching from natural language-based reasoning to a grid-based representation improves LLM performance by up to 42%, highlighting the importance of modality choice in shaping reasoning outcomes.

Shreya Rajpal, Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Michigan State University Michigan, USA

Multimodal Grounding Multimodal Reasoning Structured Reasoning Spatial Reasoning LLM Reasoning

Jun 29, 2026cs.CL

Before Thinking, Learn to Decide: Proactive Routing for Efficient Visual Reasoning

Large multimodal models have achieved strong reasoning on complex visual tasks, but their inference efficiency is often restricted by long chains of thought. A promising solution is to pair a small draft model with a large target model, enabling cooperative inference employing a routing signal that adaptively routes queries to either the draft or target model based on their difficulties for optimal efficiency and accuracy. Yet, the remaining bottleneck is to establish a reliable query difficulty signal under multimodal settings. Existing approaches designed for language models either rely on post-hoc token probabilities, which fall short in multimodal scenarios, or depend on supervised fine-tuning, which is a data-sensitive strategy. Both paradigms perform routing only after a complete output, and ignore whether the target model can actually solve the routed instances. To address this, we propose PRP, a Proactive Routing Paradigm that enables early decision-making by jointly evaluating the competence of both the draft and target models. Our Draft Rating Learning (DRL) equips the draft model with an internal confidence estimator, while Joint Rating Learning (JRL) predicts how well the target model can handle a given query, thereby prioritizing the allocation of samples it excels at rather than the hardest ones. These ratings enable fine-grained, instance-level \textbf{Proactive Routing} and substantially accelerate inference without compromising overall performance. Extensive experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks validate our effectiveness and efficiency.

Yinan Zhou, Haokun Lin, Yichen Wu +7

Xi’an Jiaotong University · ARC Lab, Tencent IEG · City University of Hong Kong +3

Efficient Multimodal Inference Adaptive Model Routing Multimodal Reasoning

Jun 29, 2026cs.CL

DAIN: Dynamic Agent-Based Interaction Network for Efficient and Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning

Current multimodal fusion approaches, particularly those based on static Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures, often struggle to provide the adaptive and efficient collaborative reasoning required by complex real-world applications. We introduce the Dynamic Agent-based Interaction Network (DAIN), which reconceptualizes multimodal fusion as a dynamic, multi-agent collaborative process. DAIN employs a context-aware Meta-Controller that dynamically schedules sparse activation of specialized interaction agents and orchestrates compressed inter-agent communication for consensus-building. The framework is guided by a multi-objective loss function that jointly optimizes task accuracy, agent specialization, and operational efficiency through sparse activation and communication regularization. Comprehensive evaluations across five diverse benchmarks -- ADNI, MIMIC-IV, MM-IMDB, CMU-MOSI, and ENRICO -- establish DAIN as a new state-of-the-art, delivering significant performance improvements including a 2.6% accuracy gain on ADNI. Ablation studies verify the critical roles of both dynamic scheduling and agent communication. Furthermore, DAIN offers enhanced interpretability by exposing context-dependent agent roles and collaboration patterns while maintaining computational efficiency through sample-wise sparse agent activation. Our work demonstrates the promise of dynamic, agent-based paradigms for multimodal reasoning.

Xinxin Chen, Yuchen Li, Zihan Wang +3

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Efficient Multimodal Inference Multi-Agent Collaboration Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Agents Multimodal Fusion

Jun 29, 2026cs.CV

Consistency as Inductive Bias: Learning Cross-View Invariance for Robust Multimodal Reasoning

Inductive biases steer learning toward generalizable solutions by encoding task structure. In this work, we identify a crucial missing bias in MLLMs: cross-view consistency, \textit{i.e.}, semantically invariant views of the same instance should lead to the same answer. Standard reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) objectives do not impose this constraint, but instead assign pointwise rewards to each visual input. Even with data augmentation (DA), transformed views are typically rewarded independently, providing little signal once within-view rewards saturate. We propose \textbf{ConsistRoll}, a simple but effective method that injects cross-view consistency into RLVR training by reusing the group-sampling mechanism of GRPO. Specifically, ConsistRoll places original and semantically invariant transformed views in the same generation group, and assigns a joint reward only when paired completions are both correct and consistent. In this way, ConsistRoll turns consistency into an online credit-assignment signal, \textbf{without extra generation overhead and annotations}. Theoretically, we show that cross-view consistency is a valid inductive bias, and ConsistRoll introduces a cross-view correction term absent from DA, penalizing view dependence and alleviating advantage collapse. Comprehensive benchmarks across math, general-purpose, hallucination domains confirm that ConsistRoll achieves robust improvements in multimodal reasoning.

Xin Zou, Haolin Deng, Yibo Yan +6

HKUST (GZ) · HKUST · UIC +1

Multi-View Consistency Multimodal Robustness Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Multimodal Foundation Models+1

Jun 29, 2026cs.CL

Can MLLMs Critique Like Humans? Evaluating Open-Ended Aesthetic Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

Open-ended aesthetic critique is a challenge for multimodal large language models (MLLMs): it has no single correct answer, and most aesthetic evaluation measures models against numeric scores rather than the written critiques people actually give. We ask whether MLLM critiques are close to human ones, scoring eight open-weight MLLMs from

7

B to

397

B, plus GPT-5.5, against multiple ranked human critiques for each of

1{,}227

\texttt{r/photocritique} posts under eight prompt conditions. Reference-based similarity gives a misleading picture. In absolute terms the stricter lexical and learned metrics align only weakly with human critiques while a coarse embedding cosine reports broad topical overlap, yet requesting shorter critiques raises those scores and withholding the image barely changes them: the similarity reflects length, the post text, and a stable critiquing style more than image-specific observation. An LLM judge sharpens the question rather than settling it: in the primary condition all four judges prefer the frontier models' critiques to the human ones, but on the

7

--

8

B models they diverge wildly, from

9\%

to

81\%

preference on identical pairs. Asked instead how similar each pair is in substance, those judges and two human annotators agree, rating every model between

1.81

and

2.59

on a

1

--

5

scale, close to ``mostly different''. Behaviorally, the models diverge in ways the scores do not surface: they cover nearly every aesthetic aspect where humans are selective and repeat themselves across critiques of one photo, even when prompted to write at human length. We argue that reference-based similarity rewards a fluent, comprehensive critique style rather than the selectivity and specificity of human critique.

Sajjad Ghiasvand, Maryam Amirizaniani, Haniyeh Ehsani Oskouie +2

UCSB · University of Washington · UCLA

Language Model Generation Evaluation Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Generative AI Evaluation

Jun 26, 2026cs.CV

AirGroundBench: Probing Spatial Intelligence in Multimodal Large Models under Heterogeneous Multi-View Embodied Collaboration

In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for embodied intelligence, yet their ability to maintain geometrically consistent spatial understanding across heterogeneous views remains under-evaluated. Existing benchmarks largely focus on single-agent, single-view perception, leaving a gap in the systematic assessment of collaborative air-ground settings, where multi-scale observations are complementary but introduce scale mismatch, asymmetric occlusion, and reference-frame inconsistencies. We present AirGroundBench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating multi-view spatial intelligence in heterogeneous UAV-UGV collaboration. AirGroundBench is built from 11 high-fidelity simulated environments with 1,021 synchronized air-ground observation pairs, yielding approximately 62,000 dual-view, four-option single-choice visual question answering instances and 115 closed-loop vision-language navigation episodes. It covers 10 task types organized into four progressively demanding capability dimensions: spatial perception, cross-view alignment, spatial transformation and reasoning, and embodied decision-making. To support geometry-grounded evaluation and analysis, we provide structured spatial annotations, including cross-view object identities and metric 2D and 3D bounding boxes. Evaluations of 13 representative MLLMs under UAV-only, UGV-only, and dual-view input settings reveal consistent bottlenecks: models perform relatively well on spatial perception but struggle with cross-view alignment and transformation-intensive reasoning, and these deficits propagate to sequential decision-making in vision-language navigation. Although dual-view inputs provide measurable gains over single-view variants, a persistent gap from human performance remains, highlighting geometric consistency as a key limitation of current embodied MLLMs.

Haotian Li, Yida Wang, Leyuan Wang +7

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · Tsinghua University +1

Multi-View Consistency Multimodal Reasoning Vision-Language Navigation Multi-Robot Coordination Multimodal Model Evaluation Heterogeneous Collaborative Perception

Jun 26, 2026cs.AI

Verifiable Geometry Problem Solving: Solver-Driven Autoformalization and Theorem Proposing

Geometry Problem Solving have increasingly adopt the neuro-symbolic paradigm, combining neural intuition with symbolic rigor. However, current frameworks suffer from severe bottlenecks in two core stages: autoformalization, which treats multimodal translation as a static task decoupled from downstream solver compatibility, and theorem prediction, where solvers frequently hit a deductive impasse due to fixed rule libraries. To address these, we propose SD-GPS, a solver-driven framework that treats the symbolic solver as an execution oracle throughout both formalization and deduction. First, Solver-Driven Autoformalization unifies supervised formal-language adaptation and solvability-guided reinforcement learning into a single module built on QwenVL3-2B, making executability the central training signal. Second, Verified Theorem Proposing introduces an impasse-aware agent that proposes local auxiliary lemmas from current proof states, ensuring soundness by filtering all proposals through symbolic verification. Empirical evaluations on Geometry3K and PGPS9K demonstrate that SD-GPS consistently outperforms existing MLLM, neural, and neuro-symbolic methods across standard completion, multiple-choice, and cross-modal reference regimes, proving that closing the loop between multimodal perception and symbolic execution significantly improves geometric reasoning, offering profound insights into how neural agents can be grounded by formal systems to achieve verifiable problem-solving capabilities.

Can Li, Ting Zhang, Junbo Zhao +1

Beijing Normal University

Automated Theorem Proving Multimodal Reasoning Mathematical Reasoning Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Autoformalization

Jun 26, 2026cs.AI

MER-R1: Multimodal Emotion Reasoning via Slow-Fast Thinking Synergy

We find that explicit reasoning does not necessarily translate into better multimodal emotion recognition (MER) accuracy, even though it makes predictions more interpretable. Specifically, for reasoning-based MLLMs, fast thinking by triggering direct answers often outperforms slow thinking after deliberative reasoning. Our empirical analyses show that fast thinking improves recall with broader and more confident predictions, whereas slow thinking favors precision through conservative filtering of incorrect categories. Building on these insights, we propose MER-R1, a reinforcement learning framework that turns slow-fast complementarity into explicit optimization. Dual-objective disentanglement separates recall and precision into two optimization signals, allowing them to be jointly optimized rather than traded off against each other. Slow-fast confidence calibration further aligns the final slow-thinking answer with fast-thinking intuition, strengthening correct emotions while suppressing incorrect ones. In this way, MER-R1 unifies the recall-oriented intuition of fast thinking with the precision-oriented selectivity of slow thinking. We further provide theoretical justification for this synergy, showing that it mitigates variance-induced interference during optimization. Extensive experiments on MER-UniBench and MME-Emotion show that MER-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance and makes reasoning genuinely benefit emotion recognition.

Zhiyuan Han, Beier Zhu, Wenwen Tong +8

University of Science and Technology of China · 2SenseTime Research · Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center +1

RL for Language Model Reasoning Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Emotion Recognition Multimodal CoT Reasoning Multimodal Understanding

Jun 25, 2026cs.CV

ReasonCLIP-58M: Visually Grounded Commonsense Reasoning Supervision for CLIP

CLIP and its variants are widely adopted visual backbones in multimodal systems, but their pretraining remains dominated by descriptive image-text alignment. As downstream applications increasingly demand visually grounded commonsense inference and compositional reasoning, it remains unclear whether CLIP-style encoders can support such reasoning without architectural changes. To address this, we present ReasonCLIP-58M, a continual pretraining framework that integrates large-scale reasoning supervision into CLIP-style models through our two-stage strategy, which progressively integrates reasoning signals while preserving descriptive alignment, followed by category-structured reasoning supervision. To support this framework, we construct two complementary datasets and a benchmark: ReasonLite-42M, with open-form, visually verifiable reasoning captions; ReasonPro-16M, with category-specific reasoning supervision; and RCLIP-Bench for diagnostic evaluation of visually grounded reasoning. We train a family of ReasonCLIP that improves visually grounded commonsense and compositional reasoning while also enhancing zero-shot retrieval performance. As a drop-in visual encoder for multimodal large language models such as LLaVA-NeXT, ReasonCLIP delivers consistent gains without additional inference cost, demonstrating that structured reasoning supervision enhances the expressive capacity of CLIP-style visual representations. All datasets, models, and training code are available at https://github.com/RISys-Lab/ReasonCLIP.

Sicheng Zhang, Muzammal Naseer, Binzhu Xie +5

Khalifa University · University of Western Australia · The Chinese University of Hong Kong +2

Compositional Reasoning Multimodal Reasoning VLM Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning Multimodal Foundation Models Continual Learning for VLMs+1

Jun 25, 2026cs.CV

Position Rebinding Cache Reuse: Replay-Free Visual Revisiting for Interleaved Multimodal Reasoning

Interleaved multimodal reasoning improves visual grounding by revisiting visual evidence during multi-step generation, yet existing methods typically rely on token replay, repeatedly forwarding selected visual tokens. A natural shortcut is to reuse the historical visual key-value (KV) cache directly. However, we identify a critical failure mode of this strategy: cached visual keys are already bound to their original positional context. Such stale positional binding distorts attention under later decoding contexts and can trigger severe autoregressive decoding collapse. This failure suggests that effective cache reuse requires reconstructing visual evidence under positions compatible with the current decoding state, rather than directly copying position-bound historical cache entries. To this end, we propose Position Rebinding Cache Reuse (PRCR), a cache-level framework for replay-free visual revisiting. PRCR stores raw visual KV cache together with their original spatial coordinates, then reassigns position-compatible coordinates to select entries and rebinds their keys before injecting the reconstructed cache into the active decoder cache. This design reuses historical visual evidence while preserving textual positional continuity and relative visual structure. Experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that PRCR achieves replay-level or better performance, improving average accuracy by 5 percent and reducing visual-revisiting computation by up to tens of thousands of times.

Mengzhao Wang, Yanli Ji, Wangmeng Zuo +2

Sun Yat-sen University · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute · Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) +3

Efficient Multimodal Inference KV Caching Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning KV-Cache Reuse+1

Jun 24, 2026cs.AI

What We are Missing in Multimodal LLM Evaluation?

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can process diverse inputs, e.g., text, images, audio, and video, and generate textual responses. While their capabilities have advanced rapidly, evaluation of such models has not kept pace. Most existing evaluation benchmarks are limited to isolated tasks and reveal little about whether a model integrates information across modalities. We examine current means for evaluating MLLMs and review the existing benchmark taxonomy to identify gaps, including temporal-spatial coherence, physical world understanding, multimodal consistency, and selective attention. Addressing these gaps is essential for measuring real progress in multimodal intelligence and exposing capability boundaries.

Po-han Li, Shenghui Chen, Sandeep Chinchali +1

The University of Texas at Austin, USA

Spatiotemporal Reasoning Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Jun 24, 2026cs.CV

TriViewBench: Controlled Complexity Scaling for Multi-View Structural Reasoning in MLLMs

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate strong performance on standard visual question answering benchmarks, yet their scalability under controlled structural complexity remains poorly understood. We introduce TriViewBench, a controlled three-view visual reasoning benchmark constructed from synthetic 3D scenes with explicitly parameterized object count and occlusion. The benchmark contains 1,923 scenes and over 14K Question-Answer (QA) pairs organized into four complexity levels and three reasoning categories: Local Decision, Object Counting, and Global Recovery. We evaluate 18 open- and closed-source MLLMs under a unified prompting protocol. All 18 models exhibit an identical capability hierarchy without exception (Local Decision > Object Counting > Global Recovery), and performance degrades monotonically with complexity: Local Decision tasks decline modestly (12.11% relative drop), while Object Counting degrades substantially (59.14%) and Global Recovery collapses severely (80.02%). Error analysis on Object Counting reveals two mechanistically independent failure modes: single-view tasks are dominated by undercounting due to occlusion blindness, whereas the multi-view task reverses to overcounting due to cross-view identity confusion. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting yields near-zero overall benefit (

Δ= -0.16\%

) and its effect on Global Recovery is strongly capability-gated, suggesting that the bottleneck lies in cross-view spatial representation rather than reasoning strategy. These findings reveal fundamental scalability limitations in current MLLMs and position TriViewBench as a controlled diagnostic framework for analyzing structural reasoning failures.

Yu-Yang Chen, Lan-Zhe Guo

School of Intelligence Science and Technology, Nanjing University, China · National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China

Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks Visual Reasoning Object Counting Multimodal Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation+2

Jun 24, 2026cs.CV

Falcon: Functional Assembly and Language for Compositional Reasoning in X-ray

Conventional vision-language models are largely object-centric, focusing on detecting and describing individual entities. In safety-critical X-ray baggage screening, however, threat often emerges not from a single object but from the functional compatibility of spatially dispersed components, such as batteries, detonators, and explosive charges. We formalize this setting as \emph{compositional threat reasoning}, where risk is modeled as a relational property of grounded regions rather than an independent detection outcome. We introduce \textbf{Falcon}, a multimodal framework that abstracts segmentation-aware region features into a structured safety state capturing component presence, pairwise functional compatibility, and scene-level risk. This structured representation is injected into the language model as an explicit intermediate interface, encouraging relationally consistent and safety-aware reasoning. To evaluate this problem, we present \textbf{Falcon-X}, a benchmark that unifies dense grounding with structured supervision over component completeness and risk inference in cluttered X-ray imagery. Experiments show that while existing multimodal models adapt to appearance, they struggle with compositional safety reasoning. Falcon improves functional grounding and produces more coherent threat assessments, establishing compositional safety reasoning as a distinct evaluation paradigm for multimodal systems.

Yonathan Michael, Mohamad Alansari, Natnael Takele +2

Computer Science Department Khalifa University · Center of Cyber-physical Systems (C2PS) Khalifa University

Multimodal Grounding Multimodal Reasoning VLM Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation

Jun 24, 2026cs.AI

Omni-Perception Policy Optimization for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning

We find that current emotion-oriented Omni-MLLMs still lack reliable omni-modal perception: they (i) underutilize multimodal cues in their reasoning trajectories and (ii) exhibit unfaithful behavior, often hallucinating modality-specific statements from other modalities. Building on these insights, we propose OPPO (Omni-Perception Policy Optimization), a reinforcement learning framework that explicitly optimizes multimodal perception. First, an Omni-Perception Reward decomposes ground-truth reasoning into fine-grained visual, acoustic, and emotion cues and rewards trajectories that semantically recover these cues. Second, an Omni-Perception Loss compares the policy under full and unimodally masked inputs, applying a KL penalty only to modality-specific evidence tokens to suppress cross-modal hallucination. We further introduce MEP-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark that quantifies utilization and faithfulness. Experiments show that OPPO achieves state-of-the-art performance on MER-UniBench and MME-Emotion, while substantially improving utilization and faithfulness scores on MEP-Bench, highlighting the importance of sufficient and faithful omni perception for multimodal emotion reasoning.

Zhiyuan Han, Beier Zhu, Wenwen Tong +6

University of Science and Technology of China · SenseTime · Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center +1

Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Hallucination Multimodal Emotion Recognition RL for VLMs Multimodal Understanding

Jun 23, 2026cs.CV

Latent Visual States for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning

The integration of visual evidence has significantly enhanced the capabilities of large multimodal models. However, this integration predominantly relies on generating discrete outputs (etc., code or box coordinates) to invoke external tools, a process that introduces rigid dependencies and substantial latency. To overcome these limitations, we propose {EVA} (LatEnt Visual StAtes), a novel framework that natively generates continuous latent visual representations. These internal representations manifest as an adaptive sequence of Latent_slot tokens, serving as intermediate visual thoughts during the reasoning process. These Latent_slot tokens are then trained end-to-end with the discrete text tokens. This co-optimization, notably, causes extreme policy deviation in the 'transition window' following the Latent_slot tokens. We develop D-GSPO (Decouple-GSPO) to target this root cause by decoupling the optimization of latent and discrete components. To support SFT, we construct EVA-230K, a high-quality text-image interleaved CoT dataset encompassing a diverse range of real-world scenes, documents, charts and OCR tasks. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks confirm that EVA achieves significant performance gains while enhancing inference efficiency.

Xiuwei Chen, Wentao Hu, Yongxin Wang +8

Sun Yat-sen University · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · MBZUAI +2

Efficient Multimodal Inference Large Vision-Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Latent Visual Reasoning Multimodal CoT Reasoning Multimodal Foundation Models+1

Jun 22, 2026cs.DC

Kamera: Unified Position-Invariant Multimodal KV Cache for Training-Free Reuse

Multimodal agents repeatedly re-examine the same video frames, UI screenshots, and rendered artifacts as their context window slides and reasoning iterates, yet every look-back re-encodes from scratch, because prefix caches serve reuse only at a fixed leading position. We show this recompute is avoidable, and identify exactly what naive KV reuse loses: the cross-chunk conditioning a chunk absorbs from its neighbours. This loss is asymmetric. The direct readout of a cached chunk is recovered exactly and for free by the standard state-merge. What remains is a diffuse, low-rank residue concentrated in deep layers, invisible to single-hop retrieval but precisely what multi-hop reasoning binds on. Blind reuse therefore leaves single-hop recall intact while halving multi-hop accuracy; this is the failure mode prior position-independent caches, designed for single-context or single-image reuse, do not address. We repair it with a small, training-free low-rank conditioning patch stored alongside each position-free chunk. Reuse reduces to one operator across MLA, GQA, and MHA: exact RoPE re-rotation to any target position, plus the patch that restores cross-chunk binding. This makes three window operations cheap: reorder (one patch serves every ordering of a cached set), sliding-window survival (surviving chunks relocate via rotation only, zero re-encode), and recall (an evicted chunk is rehydrated by its patch, never re-encoded). A rank-m patch recovers full task accuracy on cross-chunk-binding benchmarks, MM-NIAH across two attention families and two-page doc-QA, at a fraction of the KV footprint, and reconstructs re-prefill KV to within bf16 rounding in a production SGLang kernel across six backbones. The conditioning signal is strongest in redundant vision and video streams, making our solution most impactful where multimodal agents spend their recompute budget.

Bole Ma, Jan Eitzinger, Harald Koestler +1

Efficient Multimodal Inference KV Caching Multimodal Reasoning KV-Cache Reuse Multimodal Agents

Jun 22, 2026cs.AI

VeriEvol: Scaling Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Verifiable Evol-Instruct

Scaling reinforcement learning for visual mathematical reasoning requires more than generating harder questions: as data volume grows, the reward labels themselves must remain reliable. Yet existing data pipelines scale supervision while trusting the labeller, and policy-side methods assume the underlying answers are already correct. We instead treat scaling as a verifiable data-construction problem and decouple two axes before any policy update: prompt difficulty, expanded by route-specific evolution operators, and answer reliability, enforced by offline hypothesis-test falsification. We instantiate this as VeriEvol, an iterative framework with two extensible components: a type-aware evolution module that rewrites low-difficulty image-question seeds into harder, image-grounded prompts; and HTV-Agent, a verifier that accepts an answer only after multi-source counter-evidence has failed to refute it. The resulting verified data scales in volume, extends by adding evolution routes or verifier channels, and plugs directly into existing GRPO-style RL recipes. On a five-benchmark visual-math suite, scaling evolved SFT data from 10K to 250K samples raises the mean accuracy from 35.42 to 54.73; then, with backbone, SFT initialization, and GRPO recipe held fixed, VeriEvol adds a cumulative +3.88 over an un-evolved RL baseline, of which +1.82 comes from evolved prompts and +2.06 from the HTV-Agent verifier. We release the prompts, data, models, code, and the full verifier trace of every sample, so that downstream work can scale and audit the pipeline rather than only inspect its outputs.

Haoling Li, Kai Zheng, Jie Wu +4

1Tsinghua University · 2Tencent Hunyuan

Multimodal Reasoning Mathematical Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning RL for VLMs

Jun 22, 2026cs.CV

CFPO: Counterfactual Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal reasoning. However, prevailing reinforcement learning (RL) paradigms lack explicit counterfactual enhancement and causal learning mechanisms. This fundamental deficiency results in severe grounding failures, manifesting as a tendency to ignore visual evidence in favor of language priors or exhibiting hallucination drift during long chain-of-thought reasoning. To address this root cause, we propose CounterFactual Policy Optimization (CFPO), a novel framework that enforces causal consistency between visual perception and textual reasoning. CFPO introduces a cross-modal counterfactual enhancement mechanism, which regularizes the policy by maximizing the discrepancy between the model's predictions and those from a counterfactual state where critical visual cues are suppressed. This approach seamlessly integrates with standard algorithms like GRPO and DAPO without requiring external reward models or additional supervision. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CFPO significantly improves reasoning fidelity, achieving consistent gains of 3.17%-6.25% over standard RL baselines and 1.32%-2.13% over the state-of-the-art perception-aware method (PAPO). Code is available at https://github.com/Raven-July/CFPO.

Zhangyuan Yu, Wanran Sun, Guangjing Yang +2

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.

Multimodal Reasoning VLM Hallucination Mitigation RL for VLMs

Jun 22, 2026cs.CL

PIVOTSBench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Interpersonal Relationship Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

Humans possess an innate ability to understand fine-grained interpersonal relationships, which is central to everyday social interactions. Although such reasoning is inherently multimodal, it remains largely unexplored by existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs). To address this gap, we introduce PIVOTS, the first benchmark built from Social-IQ 2.0 and YouTube data to evaluate MLLMs' ability to predict bidirectional interpersonal relationship dimensions grounded in established psychology research. In addition, PIVOTS includes auxiliary tasks that assess models' ability to identify and leverage the critical visual cues underlying such predictions. We evaluate both proprietary and open-source MLLMs and conduct detailed ablation studies to analyze the effects of visual modalities and explicit social role information in conversational utterances. We further examine how joint and pairwise prediction settings benefit MLLMs in scoring bidirectional PIVOTS dimensions. Project page: https://ciossayin.github.io/pivots-bench/

Shuxiang Zhang, Yiting Yin, Wenxuan Song +2

Sun Yat-sen University · University of Michigan · Tsinghua University

Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Social Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation

Jun 21, 2026cs.CL

Look Light, Think Heavy: What Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can and Cannot Do

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a standard method for improving reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) by eliciting step-by-step thinking, but its effectiveness in multimodal tasks remains unclear. In this paper, we aim to systematically investigate the key question: What can multimodal Chain-of-Thought reasoning do, and where and why does it fall short? To this end, we evaluate 12 multimodal tasks across perception and reasoning categories using both 14 non-reasoning models and 8 reasoning models. Our analysis reveals several important findings: (1) CoT is not a free lunch and should be used selectively depending on the specific requirements of each task. For perception tasks, CoT can lead to undesirable side effects, such as reduced performance in visual grounding and object counting. In contrast, it proves effective for reasoning tasks involving mathematical, scientific, and multi-image reasoning; (2) Compared to original models, existing open-source multimodal reasoning models often yield only marginal overall improvements, possibly due to an overemphasis on mathematical reasoning at the expense of broader capabilities; (3) Visual reasoning remains a key bottleneck for current multimodal CoT, as models exhibit a Look Light, Think Heavy pattern where verbal reflection rises and falls during reasoning, whereas visual reflection consistently diminishes. These findings suggest that while multimodal CoT handles verbal reflection relatively well, it lacks the ability to maintain deep visual introspection throughout the reasoning process.

Zhuoran Jin, Kejian Zhu, Hongbang Yuan +5

The Laboratory of Cognition and Decision Intelligence for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Multimodal Reasoning VLM Reasoning Multimodal CoT Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Jun 19, 2026cs.CL

CulMind: Benchmarking Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning in Chinese Cultural Heritage

Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in Chinese Cultural Heritage (CCH) requires fine-grained reasoning over visual, textual, stylistic, and historical clues. However, existing CCH benchmarks mainly emphasize final-answer accuracy, while the accuracy and completeness of reasoning processes remain underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce CulMind and CulMind-R: a high-quality benchmark for multimodal CCH covering 50 tasks from collections of more than 100 museums, and a 24-task reasoning subset that adaptively defines task-specific dimensions for reasoning process evaluation. To evaluate reasoning quality, we propose ReaScore, a task-adaptive metric that evaluates reasoning by automatically weighting task-relevant dimensions. Experiments on 14 leading MLLMs reveal a substantial gap between answers and reasoning, especially on challenging tasks. Further analysis shows that task-adaptive dimension selection and weighting better align evaluation results with expert judgments. Overall, our benchmark and metric support a more expert-aligned assessment of CCH understanding and offer a transferable reference for broader evaluations of cultural heritage. We publicly release the data, code, and evaluation scripts at https://github.com/ZevTsao/CulMind to facilitate reproducible research.

Zhangwei Cao, Shuhan Fan, Yuting Wei +5

University of International Relations · 2Kedge Business School · 3Peking University +3

Benchmark Construction Reasoning Evaluation Multimodal Reasoning Cultural Knowledge in Language Models Cultural Heritage Multimodal Model Evaluation+1

Jun 18, 2026cs.CL

MedRLM: Recursive Multimodal Health Intelligence for Long-Context Clinical Reasoning, Sensor-Guided Screening, Evidence-Grounded Decision Support, and Community-to-Tertiary Referral Optimization

Real-world clinical decision support requires reasoning over heterogeneous and longitudinal patient information rather than answering isolated medical questions. However, current medical large language models and retrieval-augmented generation systems often rely on single-step prompting or retrieval, which can be fragile when clinical evidence is distributed across long electronic health records, medical images, sensor streams, guidelines, and referral constraints. This paper proposes MedRLM, a Recursive Multimodal Health Intelligence framework for long-context clinical reasoning, sensor-guided screening, and community-to-tertiary referral support. Instead of compressing all patient information into one prompt, MedRLM treats the patient case as an external clinical environment that can be recursively inspected, decomposed, retrieved, verified, and synthesized. The framework coordinates specialized agents for clinical text, longitudinal EHR, medical imaging, physiological sensor signals, guideline retrieval, uncertainty auditing, and referral planning. It further introduces a Clinical Evidence Graph Memory to connect patient-specific observations with retrieved evidence, standardized definitions, sensor-derived biomarkers, and referral criteria. A sensor-guided recursive triggering mechanism activates deeper reasoning when abnormal physiological or behavioral patterns are detected, while uncertainty-gated refinement supports clinician review for high-risk or low-confidence cases. We also outline a real-data evaluation design using public and credentialed clinical datasets spanning EHR, radiology, ECG, ICU time series, and referral-proxy outcomes. MedRLM aims to move medical AI from static question answering toward auditable, multimodal, and workflow-aware clinical decision support.

Aueaphum Aueawatthanaphisut

School of Information, Computer, and Communication Technology Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University Pathum Thani, Thailand

Clinical Decision Support Multimodal Reasoning Longitudinal EHR Modeling Multi-Agent LLMs

Jun 18, 2026cs.CV

ROSE: Benchmarking the Perception-to-Action Gap in Multimodal Models

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly expected to act on visual information, yet the same scene may require different actions under different task contexts. How reliably can a model turn the same visual evidence into the action required by the current context? To answer this question, we introduce \textsc{ROSE} (\textbf{R}eference-conditioned \textbf{O}ddity and \textbf{S}ymbolic \textbf{E}xecution), a controlled benchmark that holds the visual scene fixed while varying region constraints and required symbolic outputs. Through coupled counting and coordinate-action tasks, \textsc{ROSE} tests whether models can infer an implicit majority reference and act on the resulting fine-grained visual evidence under changing contexts. Across nine recent MLLMs, performance drops by as much as 44.5 percentage points from counting-oriented tasks to region-conditioned action, despite 98.8% human performance. The gap persists on paired scenes and regions for which the same model returns the correct count, while global-click and matched local controls show that coordinate grounding explains only part of the loss, revealing a distinct, model-dependent bottleneck in turning shared visual evidence into context-specific actions.

Yihao Wang, Zijian He, Jie Ren +1

Sun Yat-sen University · Shaanxi Normal University

Multimodal Grounding Multimodal Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Jun 17, 2026cs.CV

Visual-OPSD: Cross-Modal On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient Unified Multimodal Reasoning

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) interleave generated ''visual thoughts'' (VTs) with text reasoning to improve spatial tasks. This incurs roughly an order-of-magnitude inference cost from multi-step diffusion. We find this cost yields limited direct benefit. On ThinkMorph, removing or noising VTs barely changes accuracy across nine benchmarks. Once rendered, attention concentrates on the VT regardless of content. Yet a KL diagnostic shows that conditioning on a privileged VT trace shifts the model's completion distribution. This suggests the generation pathway encodes useful reasoning beyond the rendered pixels. Motivated by this gap, we propose Visual On-Policy Self-Distillation(Visual-OPSD). Teacher and student share identical weights but differ in context: the teacher sees privileged VTs while the student sees only the question. Token-level JSD distillation on on-policy student trajectories transfers the teacher's reasoning to a text-only student. Across nine benchmarks, Visual-OPSD improves over its generative teacher by

+3.40

pp with

14.3\times

speedup (10.0s vs. 142.8s per sample) and outperforms same-scale VLMs by

+63.83

pp on VSP. A Gaussian-noise control (

+0.40

pp vs.

+10.28

pp for real VTs) and

58.4\%

closure of the KL gap confirm that gains come from the semantic content of the generation pathway.

Pengyu Li, Zhitao Gao, Lingling Zhang +5

Xi’an Jiaotong University · Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Big Data Knowledge Engineering · MOE KLINNS Lab, Xi’an Jiaotong University +1

Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation Efficient Multimodal Inference Unified Multimodal Models On-Policy Self-Distillation Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Foundation Models+1

Jun 16, 2026cs.AI

MathVis-Fine: Aligning Visual Supervision with Necessity via Progressive Dependency-Guided Training for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has extended from purely linguistic domains to multimodal scenarios; however, existing approaches often treat visual inputs as homogeneous or auxiliary signals, failing to capture the intricate and sample-specific dependencies between text and images in mathematical problem-solving. This gives rise to two core issues: first, the supervisory signals for visual content are generalized and coarse-grained, lacking adaptation to the actual necessity of visual information in each sample; second, training feedback becomes inaccurate when visual rewards are uniformly applied without distinguishing the complementary relationships among inputs. These limitations hinder models from achieving precise multimodal reasoning. In this work, we propose a framework for modeling fine-grained visual dependencies in mathematical reasoning. We first construct the MathVis-Fine dataset, augmenting fine-grained visual annotations with visual dependency ratings. Building upon this dataset, we introduce a two-stage progressive visual enhancement training paradigm that balances answer correctness rewards and visual grounding rewards according to the intrinsic visual dependency level of each sample, thereby mitigating reward bias and improving supervision accuracy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the MathVis-Fine framework effectively enhances visual perception progressively based on visual dependency, offering a more precise training framework for multimodal mathematical reasoning. We will release the dataset upon acceptance.

Wanshi Xu, Haokun Zhao, Haidong Yuan +2

School of ECE, Peking University · College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University · School of Software and Microelectronics, Peking University +1

Multimodal Reasoning Multimodal Reward Modeling Multimodal CoT Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning Fine-Grained Visual Perception LLM Mathematical Reasoning

Jun 16, 2026cs.AI

FinAcumen: Financial Multimodal Reasoning via Self-Evolving Experience Memory Harness

Financial multimodal reasoning requires agents to coordinate numerical computation, retrieval, visual interpretation, and temporal grounding across heterogeneous evidence sources. Existing tool-augmented agents improve execution fidelity, yet remain largely stateless across episodes, repeatedly rediscovering reasoning strategies and failure patterns. In high-stakes financial settings, this leads to unreliable tool routing, noisy retrieval, and hallucination-prone reasoning. We present FinAcumen, a financial reasoning agent framework centered on selective experience memory for tool-augmented multimodal reasoning. FinAcumen accumulates financially grounded reasoning experience from prior trajectories, distilling successful strategies and failure-derived cautionary rules into a persistent memory bank. During inference, retrieved experiences condition reasoning only when semantic relevance exceeds a calibrated threshold, while irrelevant memory is explicitly suppressed through a fallback mechanism. A deterministic financial tool environment further grounds numerical computation, retrieval, visual decoding, and answer verification.Across four financial multimodal reasoning benchmarks, FinAcumen consistently improves a frozen 8B vision-language model over finance-specialized models and approaches leading proprietary general-purpose models. Further analysis shows that selective experience activation improves reasoning reliability under retrieval uncertainty. Our code is available at https://github.com/CamelliaLilium/FinAcumen.

Pianran Guo, Pengcheng Zhou, Yucheng Jian +3

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · Wuhan Eonray Technology Co., Ltd. · Queen Mary University of London

Multimodal Reasoning LLM Agents Finance Memory-Augmented Language Model Agents

Jun 16, 2026cs.CV

LADBench: A Benchmark for Logical Fault Detection in Images

Large Vision Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual question answering and semantic grounding, but their capacity for autonomous logical reasoning remains underexplored. Existing anomaly benchmarks emphasize visual errors or direct prompting rather than the physical and social common sense needed for open-world deployment. To address this, we introduce LAD-bench, a benchmark of more than 1,000 curated synthetic images with logical anomalies across four domains: Residential, Urban, Collaborative, and Nature. We further propose a Tiered Prompting Protocol based on progressive disclosure, which measures how much explicit assistance a model needs to localize and reason about a logical fault. Evaluating leading foundation models reveals substantial weaknesses: even the best achieves only 70.11% overall accuracy, showing that implicit logical fault detection remains unsolved. Crucially, models often fail to identify anomalies even after receiving explicit hints in deeper tiers. By surfacing these limitations in sequential multimodal reasoning, LAD-Bench offers a rigorous framework for advancing the safety, reliability, and cognitive alignment of autonomous visual systems. Dataset and Code: https://huggingface.co/datasets/SahasraK/LADBench

Sahasra Kondapalli, Lara Radovanovic, Aadi Palnitkar +2

Embodied Robotics and Automation Lab, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33610, USA.

VLM Evaluation Multimodal Reasoning VLM Reasoning Anomaly Detection

Jun 15, 2026cs.CV

Not Truly Multilingual: Script Consistency as a Missing Dimension in VLM Evaluation

Current multilingual evaluations for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) assume a one-to-one mapping between language and orthography, overlooking billions of users of multi-script languages. We introduce PuMVR (Punjabi Multimodal Visual Reasoning), a benchmark of 1,000 strictly parallel image-text instances across Punjabi's three active scripts: Gurmukhi, Shahmukhi, and Roman. Evaluating 10 state-of-the-art VLMs, we expose a substantial and systematic Script Gap. Models frequently solve visual tasks in one script while failing identical tasks in another, with accuracy deltas reaching 16%. Crucially, visual input boosts absolute performance uniformly yet does not close the orthographic gap. Furthermore, cross-script in-context transfer is highly brittle, exposing script-locked knowledge representation. Supported by McNemar tests across all script pairs, our findings demonstrate that current "multilingual" VLMs are not truly multi-script. We propose the Script Consistency Rate (SCR), which falls as low as 24.8% on our benchmark, as a mandatory metric for script-agnostic evaluation to ensure equitable AI access. Data and code are available at: https://github.com/prabhjotschugh/Not-Truly-Multilingual-PuMVR.

Prabhjot Singh, Bhushan Pawar, Madhu Reddiboina +1

RediMinds Inc., USA · The University of Texas at Austin, USA · Indian AI Research Organization (IAIRO), India

VLM Evaluation Multilingual Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Multilingual VLM Evaluation VLM Reasoning Multimodal Understanding