Noisy Labels

Class-balanced learning and label noise create a coupled failure mode: frequency correction prevents majority classes from dominating the decision rule, but can amplify incorrectly labeled minority examples. We introduce BARGE (Bounded Adjustment with Reliability-Guided Embeddings), a single-stage objective combining a bounded, prior-adjusted density-power score with reliability-guided angular geometry. Its classification score is strictly proper in the adjusted probability space and recovers balanced Bayes ordering under clean supervision and the true class prior. Under label contamination, its finite range bounds classification-risk perturbation at a fixed predictor, while its logit gradient redescends when the model confidently contradicts the supplied label. The adjusted target probability also weights class-equal feature compactness, and a one-sided separation term discourages aligned class directions. BARGE requires neither a noise rate nor a transition matrix, uses one network, and leaves inference unchanged. We evaluate it on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under long-tail and step imbalance, clean labels, and 20% and 40% random incorrect-label replacement. Across 12 clean settings, BARGE ranks second overall and attains the lowest error in four. Under corruption, it achieves the lowest mean balanced error in all six dataset-corruption settings, reducing the six-setting average from 72.32% for the strongest competitor to 70.00%. It also obtains the highest macro-F1 and macro-AUPRC in every corrupted-label setting. Ablations show that class-equal angular compactness improves on the bounded score alone. These results support bounded predictive influence and reliability-guided geometry as complementary mechanisms for imbalanced learning with uncertain labels.

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

Noisy annotations pose a significant challenge for supervised deep learning, as neural networks rely on large-scale, high-quality labeled data whose corruption can severely impair model performance. Although robustness to label noise has been extensively studied for classification tasks, it remains relatively underexplored in Pose Estimation (PE). This limitation becomes critical in clinical contexts, including neonatology, where PE of preterm infants is used to support the assessment of spontaneous motility, a key indicator of neurodevelopmental trajectories. In such settings, infants' images labeling is further hindered by visual challenges (e.g., keypoint self-occlusions, caregiver interference), making the annotation process inherently susceptible to errors. To tackle noisy annotations in PE, we introduce REliable keypoint selection via Memory of traINing Dynamics (REMIND), a clustering-based keypoint-selection strategy that exploits keypoint-wise training dynamics to identify noisy labels without assuming any prior knowledge of the noise distribution, thus enabling noise-free model training. When evaluated on the proprietary NeoPose dataset, comprising 46 videos of 46 preterm infants recorded in real clinical settings, REMIND correctly identifies noisy annotations across multiple corruption scenarios, achieving up to 93% Area Under the Curve (AUC) with three different PE architectures used in the relevant literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly address label noise in preterm infants' PE, paving the way for the design of trustworthy learning-based algorithms for infants'monitoring support when data quality cannot be guaranteed.

Large language models are increasingly used to annotate datasets for training smaller, task-specialized models such as named entity recognition. While this method yields effective models, it assumes that the synthetic dataset is correctly annotated. In this work, we find that (i) current fine-tuning processes simply ignore LLM-introduced annotation noise, resulting in degraded performance and (ii) existing noise-robust losses are not transferable to sequence labeling because annotation noise in named entity recognition is heterogeneous: for example, missing mentions and type errors affect the training signal in different ways. Treating all noisy tokens equally in noise-robust losses and applying a single reweighing criterion for all may therefore remove useful supervision or reinforce incorrect labels. To address this limitation, we propose error-type-aware loss reweighting for NER, which introduces separate reweighing rules for different types of potentially erroneous tokens. Our approach is simple and efficient, does not require additional training resources, and improves F1 by 0.8 - 2.0 percentage points on dataset-level average for noise levels between 15% and 40%, with a maximum improvement of 4.6 percentage points with 24.1% noise on Wikigold.

Noisy labels remain a critical challenge for training deep neural networks, since memorizing incorrect labels degrades generalization. Once noisy samples are identified after training, the standard solution is to retrain the model from scratch on the cleaned dataset, which is increasingly expensive as datasets and models grow. Machine Unlearning (MU) has recently emerged as a computationally efficient alternative, but the relative effectiveness of different MU strategies for noisy-label correction remains poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a comparative empirical study of five MU methods (NegGrad, Fine-Tuning (FT), Random Labeling (RL), SalUn, and MUNBa) across symmetric, asymmetric, instance-dependent, and open-set noise on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and the real-world noisy dataset Food-101N. Our central finding is that the appropriate unlearning strategy is conditioned on the noise structure. Simple FT is a strong baseline across most closed-set scenarios; RL and SalUn are the most consistently robust methods and, under instance-dependent noise, approach retraining accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost; MUNBa shows advantages mainly under extreme symmetric noise. Under open-set noise, in contrast, we show that retraining on the cleaned subset degrades accuracy relative to the noisy baseline, so approximating the retrained model is not an adequate objective in this regime. On Food-101N, all MU methods remain competitive and achieve accuracies close to retraining despite reducing runtime by an order of magnitude. These findings provide practical guidelines for selecting MU strategies for post-training noisy-label correction.

Dynamic Time Warping (DTW)-based Nearest-Neighbor (NN) classifiers are effective for time-series classification but are vulnerable to mislabeled training samples and require numerous DTW computations during inference. We propose DTW-based Granular Ball Computing (DTW-GBC), which organizes temporally similar training samples into granular balls and performs classification at the granule level. We further develop two granular-ball construction strategies for DTW-GBC. Experiments on four benchmark datasets with symmetric label noise show that the two DTW-GBC variants generally mitigate the performance degradation caused by label noise while requiring substantially fewer comparisons than DTW-based 1-NN during inference. These findings suggest that DTW-GBC provides a favorable balance between classification robustness and inference efficiency.

Open-vocabulary change detection (OVCD) enables the identification of user-specified land-cover changes in bitemporal remote sensing images, but existing training-free pipelines remain vulnerable to inaccurate candidate masks, ambiguous semantic assignments, and accumulated inference errors. To address these issues, we propose Zero-OVCD, a two-stage framework that requires no pixel-level annotations from the target domain. In the first stage, high-quality change pseudo-labels are generated through complementary candidate-mask refinement, multiscale semantic similarity fusion with margin-based reliability filtering, and response-guided mask correction and completion. These components jointly suppress noisy candidates, enhance mask-level semantic discrimination, and recover missed change regions. In the second stage, a change detector is trained using the generated pseudo-labels, while checkpoint voting and high-agreement sample selection are introduced to mitigate residual pseudo-label noise. On LEVIR-CD, WHU-CD, and S2Looking, Stage I achieves F1 scores of 86.25%, 85.82%, and 50.48%, while Stage II further improves them to 88.65%, 88.85%, and 57.96%, respectively. On SECOND, the macro-average F1 across six category-wise one-vs-rest tasks increases from 47.91% to 50.92%. These results demonstrate that bridging training-free foundation-model inference with noise-aware pseudo-label learning provides an effective solution for open-vocabulary change detection without target-domain pixel-level annotations. Code will be available at https://github.com/1321663019/Zero-OVCD.

Inferring the ground-truth from noisy crowdsourced labels is an important theoretical and practical problem. Neural network-based methods offer an alternative to classical Bayesian models which require specifying a family of generative models used for inference. However, current models either still rely on fairly simple generative models for inference or require pseudo-labels or synthetic data to train the aggregate classifier. We propose a graph VAE architecture in which the decoder and encoder use GAT-based message passing on the adjacency graph of a crowdsourced dataset and its dual, respectively. The ground-truth labels are treated as latent variables, enabling unsupervised representation learning without needing to train a separate classifier. We show our model achieves state of the art performance on crowdsourcing benchmarks. We then demonstrate the generality of our approach by showing how the original crowdsourcing graph can be augmented to incorporate side information such as representations from neural network classifiers trained on the noisy labels to substantially boost their classification performance at test time.

Semi-supervised adaptation of vision foundation models (VFMs) commonly freezes the pretrained backbone and updates lightweight modules such as LoRA. However, pseudo-labels have mixed reliability, and a single LoRA adapter must absorb reliable, ambiguous, and noisy gradients in the same low-rank space. This can make VFM adaptation sensitive to pseudo-label noise. We propose \textbf{TriNoL}, a \textbf{Tri}ple-expert learning framework from \textbf{No}isy \textbf{L}abels for semi-supervised VFM adaptation. TriNoL routes unlabeled samples into three confidence regions and assigns them to three LoRA experts: a Positive Expert for high-confidence pseudo-labels, an Alignment Expert for medium-confidence ambiguous samples, and a Negative Expert for low-confidence noisy samples. The VFM backbone remains frozen, and only the LoRA experts and classifier head are updated. By separating different pseudo-label reliability regions into specialized adaptation paths, TriNoL improves robustness to noisy supervision while keeping the training cost low.

Hypergraph neural networks (HGNNs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing complex higher-order relationships. However, their performance is highly dependent on labeled data, making them vulnerable to label noise. Despite advances in learning with label noise (LLN) and graph learning with label noise (GLN), noisy-label learning on hypergraphs remains underexplored. In this paper, we present a systematic study of hypergraph node classification under label noise. First, we adapt representative LLN and GLN methods to hypergraphs and evaluate them under a unified benchmark, revealing the limitations of existing robust learning strategies for hypergraphs. Building on this, we propose a new hypergraph robust framework, HyperTrust, which first estimates hyperedge trustworthiness through a pretraining-based, entropy-aware strategy, and then incorporates the HyperedgeBoost module to enhance reliable supervision by connecting unlabeled nodes to trustworthy hyperedges, as well as the HyperedgePrune module to suppress noisy propagation by removing untrustworthy node-hyperedge incidences. Finally, two modules work collaboratively to adjust the hypergraph structure and generate final predictions. Extensive experiments and theoretical analysis demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of HyperTrust on multiple hypergraph datasets under various noisy settings. Our work provides a unified benchmark and an effective solution for hypergraph learning with label noise and lays a foundation for future research in this direction.

Label noise is common in medical imaging datasets due to factors such as inter-rater variability, annotation errors, and ambiguous cases. This can severely undermine the reliability and clinical effectiveness of machine learning models trained using those datasets. To address this challenge, we introduce Lightweight Noise Correction (LiNC), which adds a single trainable trust parameter per training sample and learns when to use the observed label and when to defer to the model during a standard training loop. The key idea is to train using a convex combination of the observed label and the model's own predictive distribution, controlled by a per-sample trust parameter. We show that the gradient of this objective drives trust values in opposite directions for clean versus noisy samples in the early training phase, yielding separable trust distributions. We use a 3-component Gaussian Mixture Model over the trust values to separate them into clean, ambiguous, and noisy cases and then execute a short soft-correction phase on the noisy cases and a final hard correction phase. Experiments on ten 2D datasets from MedMNISTv2 under label noise of up to 50% show consistent gains in accuracy and strong mislabel detection. LiNC adds negligible asymptotic overhead: the training-time complexity remains dominated by the base network, with additional memory growing linearly with the size of the training set.

Refurbishment-based noisy-label learning mixes an observed label with a model-derived pseudo target, typically using one sample-wise cleanliness score to control both branches. This creates a hidden coupling: reducing trust in the observed label automatically increases trust in the pseudo target. We show that this complementarity can replace one unreliable signal with another because a pseudo target learned from corrupted supervision may reproduce the noise it is meant to correct. Our representation diagnostics provide a consistent account of this mismatch: noisy supervision redirects deeper layers more strongly, whereas shallower relations remain comparatively stable and provide information beyond the loss posterior. We therefore propose TRACE, a Two-Source Reliability Assessment framework for Label Correction and Sample Reweighting. TRACE assesses the observed label using loss fit, shallow relation stability, and prediction agreement, while separately assessing the pseudo target using model confidence. Its source-specific scores control target correction and supervision strength without assuming complementary reliability. Across synthetic and real-world noisy benchmarks, TRACE improves representative refurbishment baselines and yields more reliable pseudo supervision.

Supervised deep learning models rely on large, accurately labeled datasets, yet noisy annotations are often unavoidable and can severely degrade performance under high noise levels. Recent state-of-the-art methods tackle this by using sample selection strategies that exploit the memorization effect to filter out clean data for semi-supervised learning. However, these methods struggle with extreme noise, class imbalance, and require careful tuning or prior noise knowledge. To address these limitations, we propose XMix, a novel framework that leverages local smoothness in the self-supervised feature space to systematically enhance all stages of the sample selection process, without dependence on potentially corrupted labels. First, XMix estimates the noise rate using maximum likelihood among self-supervised feature neighbors. Second, these neighbors then help identify additional clean samples and ensure balanced selection across classes during sample selection. Finally, in the semi-supervised learning phase, XMix uses neighboring samples to generate more reliable pseudo-labels. Our empirical results show that XMix substantially outperforms existing methods in extremely noisy environments and maintains superior performance in standard LNL benchmarks.

Conformalized selection has been widely applied to select high-quality candidates from large datasets with rigorous uncertainty quantification, such as reliable labeling, drug discovery, and the alignment of large language models. Nevertheless, existing methods assume clean responses on calibration data, an assumption that rarely holds in practice. In this paper, we formulate the above tasks as selecting candidates with true predicted labels or with responses exceeding certain values. We demonstrate that existing conformal selection methods fail to control the false discovery rate (FDR) or suffer from severe power loss under contaminated calibration data. To that end, we propose Robust Conformalized Selection (RCS), a unified framework for selective classification with valid FDR control under general label contamination. The key insight of RCS lies in a novel statistical reduction: by separately conditioning on different classes, we translate the intractable label noise into a localized covariate shift problem, which then enables a covariate-adjusted empirical-Bayes-type estimate of the number of false selections. Statistical properties such as the asymptotic FDR control, power optimality, and robustness of RCS are established. We further develop an instantiation of RCS under randomized response model, and also apply RCS to the task of selecting candidates with large response values. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of RCS.

In recent years, multi-view learning has attracted increasing attention, as it integrates the complementary information of heterogeneous views. Most existing multi-view classification methods rely on accurate annotations to guarantee performance. However, noisy labels are ubiquitous in practice due to imperfect annotation, and the refinement signals that existing methods derive from models trained on such noisy supervision can gradually lose their reliability. To deal with this problem, we propose a novel Global Anchor-based Label Auditing method (GALA) for multi-view classification to resist the negative impact of noisy labels. Specifically, we construct a global anchor for each class in every view, which aggregates the samples of the whole class and thus offers a stable reference insensitive to individual predictions. Then, each view measures how close an instance is to the anchor of its observed label relative to the nearest competing anchor, and the per-view evaluations are fused with the classifier confidence into a cross-view audit score. Based on the audit scores, suspicious samples are assigned small weights, and an adaptive correction strategy rewrites a label only when the anchor-based candidate agrees with the classifier prediction. Finally, the corrected labels in turn refine the anchors and supervise noise-robust representation learning. Extensive experiments on six datasets demonstrate that GALA outperforms eight state-of-the-art methods, especially under high noise rates.

Deep learning models excel in visual recognition but suffer severe performance drops when training labels are corrupted by noise. Under label noise prior work cannot learn accurate similarities and thus misguide the learning process. In this paper, we uncover a complementary and novel phenomenon, Dissimilarity Invariance, whereby semantic dissimilarity between unrelated samples remains stable despite label noise. Leveraging this insight, we propose NegScale, a plug-and-play framework that shifts focus from fragile similarity to robust dissimilarity. NegScale integrates: (1) Structured Negative Orthogonality Penalty (SNOP), enforcing subspace orthogonality for unrelated samples; and (2) Dissimilarity-Calibrated Similarity Adjustment (DCSA), suppressing spurious similarity using dissimilarity anchors. We also give theoretical analysis that proves Dissimilarity Invariance and the effectiveness of NegScale. Empirical results demonstrate that NegScale consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, establishing new benchmarks on CIFAR with synthetic noise and real-world datasets.

Learning with noisy labels is a fundamental problem in training reliable deep neural networks. Robust loss functions provide a direct and effective way to mitigate the adverse effects of label noise. However, most existing robust losses are designed directly at the level of the final multiclass objective, which makes it difficult to systematically characterize and extend their robustness properties. In this paper, we propose a general framework that constructs robust multiclass losses from univariate base functions. By defining mapping operators from base functions to multiclass losses, the robustness of the induced losses can be characterized through simple properties of the base functions. We develop two complementary construction schemes, Target Separation and Binary Reduction, corresponding to inter-class independent and inter-class dependent formulations, respectively. For both schemes, we analyze their symmetry and asymmetry properties and derive corresponding sufficient conditions, which provide theoretical criteria for noise-robust loss design. The proposed framework also provides a new route to constructing symmetric losses, serving as a complement to normalization-based symmetric loss designs. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world noisy-label benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed losses achieve competitive or superior performance under various noise settings.

Deep networks trained with label noise often learn clean structure before memorizing corrupted labels. We show that this transition leaves a spectral signature in the centered scatter of per-example last-layer gradients. Its effective rank transiently expands during memorization and contracts after corrupted labels are fit. We call this phenomenon Fisher Rank Inflation. Corrupted labels increase effective rank by injecting spectral mass into low-energy or previously unused eigendirections, increasing the entropy of the gradient spectrum. We derive a first-order leave-one-out attribution formula, identify conditions under which corrupted examples contribute more strongly than clean examples, and explain why attribution signals weaken once the normalized Fisher-gradient spectrum stabilizes. We test these predictions on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and CIFAR-10N using SmallCNN, ResNet18, and Vision Transformers. Across settings, Fisher effective rank exhibits a consistent inflation--collapse trajectory aligned with memorization. At peak-rank checkpoints, corrupted examples are enriched among the highest rank-contributing samples, with top-100 noisy fractions from $69.2\%$ to $96.2\%$ across five-seed synthetic-corruption experiments and $94.4\%\pm1.9\%$ on CIFAR-10N. First-order spectral attribution closely matches exact leave-one-out contributions in convolutional models and remains enriched in the Vision Transformer. Peak effective rank increases monotonically with corruption severity, from $28.88\pm1.95$ under clean training to $97.09\pm1.78$ at $60\%$ corruption. In several settings, the retrospectively identified onset of rank inflation precedes observable test degradation. These results establish Fisher Rank Inflation as a spectral signature connecting corrupted-example enrichment, corruption severity, and the transition from structure learning to memorization.

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become an important method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences because it removes the need for explicit reward modeling and reinforcement learning optimization. However, its performance depends heavily on the quality of preference data, and noisy preference data in real-world settings can weaken alignment performance. To address this issue, we propose a bilevel optimization framework and prove, under certain assumptions, that this framework can recover the DPO optimum under clean data. We further derive a prior form for the learnable weighting function under asymmetric label-flipping noise. Considering that high-quality metadata may be difficult to obtain, we propose a task-agnostic meta-knowledge-driven method that enables meta-learning even when metadata is completely unavailable. To reduce the high cost of higher-order gradients in LLM meta-learning, we combine central-difference approximation with LoRA fine-tuning and develop a scalable training scheme. Experiments on TL;DR summarization and Anthropic HH single-turn dialogue show that the proposed method improves training performance over multiple DPO baselines under different noise rates.

Rank estimation under label noise poses a fundamental challenge, as ordinal annotations often exhibit structured uncertainty rather than simple label corruption. In this paper, we reformulate rank estimation with noisy ordinal labels as a stochastic ordering problem, in which each instance is inherently associated with multiple plausible ranks instead of a single deterministic label. Based on this view, we propose stochastic order learning (SOL), a learning framework that captures ordinal label uncertainty and learns an embedding space through two complementary objectives: a discriminative loss that structures instance--centroid interactions and a stochastic order loss that enforces probabilistic ordering relations between instances. Extensive experiments across diverse datasets demonstrate that SOL enables reliable rank estimation under various types and levels of label noise. The source code is available at https://github.com/cwlee00/SOL.

In non-stationary streaming environments, simultaneously adapting to complex, non-linear domain shifts via continual learning while mitigating the catastrophic effects of severe, uncalibrated label noise poses a fundamental mathematical challenge. In this paper, we propose \FlatManifold{}, a novel, streamlined robust continual learning framework that utilizes a Nyström manifold flattening map based on the kernel trick and projection onto an orthogonalized Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). Unlike traditional methods that rely on complex, error-prone sample-filtering pipelines, the proposed approach exploits the intrinsic mathematical robustness of the flattened space itself. By mapping feature distributions onto a fixed orthogonal target topology with a ridge regularizer, the framework naturally smoothes and counteracts the influence of extreme label noise during the optimization process. Concurrently, catastrophic forgetting is prevented via a continual topology brake term that leverages the covariance matrix of past experiences. Extensive evaluation on real-world multi-session robotics datasets demonstrates that even under severe conditions featuring 40% symmetric label noise, \FlatManifold{} successfully mitigates gradient corruption. Under extreme cross-session domain shifts spanning various seasons and lighting conditions, the proposed framework establishes high generalization capabilities, significantly outperforming standard sequential optimization baselines and proving that structural linearization itself serves as a powerful mathematical barrier against distributed label corruption.

Existing methods for testing deep neural networks (DNNs) primarily prioritize test inputs likely to reveal model faults under a fixed labeling budget. In practice, choosing that budget is difficult: too little testing misses failures, while too much incurs unnecessary labeling costs. This work studies the stopping problem in DNN testing. We formulate testing as a cost--benefit decision process in which labeling an input incurs cost $c$ and discovering a fault yields value $v$. Based on this formulation, we introduce \textit{AdaStop}, a framework that estimates the marginal fault discovery rate during testing and stops labeling when the estimated rate falls below the threshold $τ= c/v$. Experiments across multiple datasets, architectures, and selection strategies show that $65$--$84\%$ of faults can be discovered using only $9$--$31\%$ of the labeling budget.

Adversarial robustness in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) remains a significant challenge due to noisy pseudo labels and inherent distributional shifts between the clean source and adversarially perturbed target domains. Existing approaches often fail to achieve an optimal trade-off between robustness and accuracy, as pseudo-labels generated by domain-adapted models tend to introduce classification errors under adversarial attacks. In this work, we propose \textbf{SFT+RL}, a two-stage robust UDA framework that integrates Supervised Fine Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) on top of CLIP's pre-trained visual encoder. In the SFT stage, we adversarially fine-tune a linear classifier using PGD-based perturbations over the labelled source domain while partially unfreezing CLIP's projection layer. It allows adaptation to adversarial noise while preserving CLIP's rich semantic priors. We introduce a confidence-guided pseudo-labeling strategy in the RL stage to annotate unlabeled target samples progressively. Pseudo labels are filtered using a decaying confidence threshold to balance quality and coverage, and the model is trained on a composite dataset formed by combining clean source samples with high-confidence target samples. Adversarial training is applied to mixed batches of clean and adversarial examples to enhance cross-domain robustness. Comprehensive evaluations on three benchmark datasets OfficeHome~\cite{tomm-ude}, PACS~\cite{pacs}, and VisDA~\cite{visda} demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, \textbf{SFT+RL} achieves average improvements of \textbf{10.2%} in clean accuracy and \textbf{15.8%} in adversarial robustness across all three datasets, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods.

Micro-ultrasound ($μ$US) is a new, emerging, and promising imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, but accurate identification of suspicious tissue remains highly dependent on clinical experience, leading to substantial inter-observer variability. Machine-learning assistance can reduce this variability; however, training reliable deep models is challenging because supervision is sparse and noisy -- typically limited to core-level histopathology outcomes (e.g., cancer grade and its percentage in a biopsy core) without pixel-level lesion annotations and under severe class imbalance. We introduce Prost-RL, which reframes $μ$US PCa detection as a spatially aware, policy-driven inference problem by learning where to look before decoding. Prost-RL integrates a lightweight reinforcement-learning policy into a foundation-model encoder-decoder to generate interpretable spatial attention maps that act as soft prompts for both cancer-likelihood heatmap prediction and image-level classification. We further propose Adaptive Policy Optimization (APO) to stabilize hybrid supervised-RL training and a noise-robust objective combining symmetric cross-entropy with negative-entropy regularization to mitigate weak-label noise and encourage sharp localization. On a cohort of 6,607 biopsy cores from 693 patients across five clinical sites, Prost-RL achieves $79.0\pm3.5$ AUROC with $64.6\pm6.3$% sensitivity at 80% specificity for core-level detection (+2.1 AUROC and +4.5 sensitivity points over the strongest baseline), and $79.3\pm5.8$ AUROC for clinically significant cancer classification. The learned policy highlights biopsy-aligned regions, providing transparent, spatially grounded evidence alongside quantitative risk predictions. Code is available at: https://github.com/DeepRCL/Prost-RL.

Dataset distillation (DD) condenses large corpora into compact, information-rich subsets for efficient training and reuse. However, under noisy supervision, DD risks condensing corrupted associations together with useful signals, degrading robustness. Conventional noisy-label remedies (sample selection, loss weighting, label correction) tightly couple noise estimation with model optimization, often require clean anchors, and can amplify confirmation bias-assumptions that are misaligned with DD's goal of compact, plug-and-play supervision. We therefore propose a trajectory-based DD framework that jointly suppresses noise and preserves transferable knowledge without relabeling or clean subsets. It comprises two complementary components: Selective Guidance Reweighting (SGR), which fuses global forgetting patterns (second-split forgetting) with local neighborhood consistency into a progressive reweighting scheme that prioritizes clean supervision along the teacher trajectory; and Teacher-Inspired Auxiliary Targets (TIAT), which inject auxiliary residual guidance distilled from intermediate teacher dynamics to reinforce informative signals while remaining internally consistent. Together, SGR and TIAT produce distilled datasets with cleaner and richer representations under noisy supervision. The framework is robust, label-preserving, computationally lightweight, and broadly applicable, yielding consistent gains over state-of-the-art DD baselines across symmetric, asymmetric, and real-world noise.

Poisoning attacks entail attackers intentionally tampering with training data. In this paper, we consider a dirty-label poisoning attack scenario on a speech commands classification system. The threat model assumes that certain utterances from one of the classes (source class) are poisoned by superimposing a trigger on it, and its label is changed to another class selected by the attacker (target class). We propose a filtering defense against such an attack. First, we use DIstillation with NO labels (DINO) to learn unsupervised representations for all the training examples. Next, we use K-means and LDA to cluster these representations. Finally, we keep the utterances with the most repeated label in their cluster for training and discard the rest. For a 10% poisoned source class, we demonstrate a drop in attack success rate from 99.75% to 0.25%. We test our defense against a variety of threat models, including different target and source classes, as well as trigger variations.

The performance of deep learning models is affected by not only data quantity but also data quality. Data pruning is a process by which practitioners can reduce the size of a dataset by only keeping the most important training data points, thereby achieving similar test set performance. We empirically investigate two popular data pruning methods under noisy and noiseless conditions and show that these methods fail in the presence of significant label noise. We highlight that the success of data pruning is distinctly affected by three factors: redundancy in the dataset, the presence of problematic samples, and interdependence between samples. We perform a detailed investigation on commonly used benchmark classification datasets and neural network architectures. We find that our observations are consistent across data distributions and training protocols.

Implicit feedback is widely used in recommender systems due to its accessibility and generality, yet it usually presents noisy samples (e.g., clickbait, position bias). Meanwhile, recommenders inevitably face the item cold-start problem due to the continuous influx of new items. We identify that cold items are more prone to noisy samples due to the aforementioned factors, and researchers often overlook the significance of denoising implicit feedback for cold items. Previous denoising studies usually identify noisy samples based on heuristic patterns, such as higher loss values, and mitigate noise through sample selection or re-weighting. However, these methods have limited adaptability and are ineffective in cold-start scenarios. To achieve denoising implicit feedback for cold-start recommendation, we propose a model-agnostic denoising method called DIF. First, user preferences for content remain stable, which allows us to infer pseudo-labels indicating whether a user is interested in a cold item through content-similar warm items. Furthermore, to improve pseudo-label accuracy, we model the confidence of pseudo-labels based on the content similarity between the cold item and warm items, and then aggregate multiple pseudo-labels for each sample. Finally, we explicitly estimate the uncertainty of the noisy sample label by considering its relative entropy and the cold-start status of the item, which adaptively guides the role of pseudo-labels to correct the noisy labels at the sample level. DIF's superiority is supported by both theoretical justification and extensive experiments on real-world datasets. The method has been deployed on a billion-user scale short video application Kuaishou and has significantly improved various commercial metrics within cold-start scenarios.

Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) optimization relies on accurately annotated real-world trigger events, particularly rare but critical delayed and false AEB triggers that expose system deficiencies. However, these minority samples comprise less than 5% of thousands of daily triggers, making manual annotation prohibitively expensive at scale. We present the first automated AEB annotation framework to address this problem. During development, we identified two fundamental challenges that severely impair delayed/false trigger annotation accuracy: (1) Extreme class imbalance where delayed/false triggers are overwhelmed by true triggers; (2) Asymmetric label noise where mislabeled majority samples (true triggers) suppress minority samples (delayed/false triggers) learning. To overcome these challenges, we propose two key innovations: (1) Specific data augmentation that synthesizes realistic samples by manipulating focal target attributes, transplanting ego-vehicle dynamics, and masking non-focal agents; (2) noise suppression using stable hardness estimation and probe-guided adaptive threshold to clean mislabeled true trigger samples. Crucially, we deploy our model as a practical annotation system with full-stack architecture, efficiently identifying critical delayed/false triggers from thousands of daily AEB events. Production results demonstrate 80% improvement in recall of delayed/false triggers and 50% reduction in manual workload. Beyond immediate gains, the system enables continuous self-improvement through accumulated high-quality annotations, establishing a necessary data foundation for on-vehicle AEB system optimization

Motivation: Noisy labels are a common challenge in molecular property prediction because molecular annotations are often obtained from assays, curated databases, or weak annotation pipelines rather than directly observed clean biological states. Treating recorded labels as reliable supervision can cause models to memorize corrupted observations and learn misleading molecular evidence. In multimodal molecular representation learning, this issue can be amplified by graph-text fusion or alignment, which may propagate label-induced errors across modalities. Results: We propose MOLAR, a noise-aware framework for learning multimodal molecular representations from noisy labels. MOLAR separates latent clean-property inference from recorded-label observation: graph and text views contribute residual evidence to a clean-property distribution, and a categorical label-observation channel maps this distribution to recorded labels for training. This formulation derives posterior label reliability and modality-specific molecular evidence from the model. Experiments on naturally noisy molecular benchmarks and controlled label-flipping benchmarks show that MOLAR consistently outperforms representative baselines. Visualization analyses further show that MOLAR provides interpretable reliability and modality-evidence diagnostics.

While federated learning (FL) enables collaborative medical image segmentation without centralizing sensitive data, real-world deployment is frequently complicated by cross-site label imperfections such as contour disagreement, missing or additional structures, and confused labels. Federated noisy label learning (FNLL) aims to mitigate these effects, yet remains underused in practice as existing evidence is largely based on synthetic noise, simplified settings, and limited real-world noisy evaluation. We address this gap by introducing a benchmark suite that combines diverse real-world noisy datasets, deployment-relevant client-noise scenarios, and label-noise-targeted evaluation to support systematic FNLL assessment and informed method selection. The suite combines curated real-world noisy medical image segmentation datasets from diverse sources with a comprehensive federated segmentation framework including various client-noise scenarios and noise-targeted evaluation. The presented suite provides a realistic and discriminative basis for FNLL evaluation in medical image segmentation and establishes a reusable foundation for fair benchmarking, dataset-specific label-noise characterization, and future method development under realistic federated settings. Code is available at https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/FedSegNoiseBench.

Engineered robust losses such as Huber, Student-$t$, and generalised cross-entropy make supervised models tolerant of contamination but cannot answer which observations are corrupted. We introduce Neural Bayesian Anomaly Mitigation (NBAM), a general-purpose drop-in loss derived from a Bayesian latent-switch mixture model: the marginal likelihood defines a robust supervised loss, and the associated posterior defines an unsupervised contamination classifier. Like Huber or Student-$t$, NBAM can replace the standard training loss in any supervised pipeline; unlike them, it additionally learns a structured contamination model and returns a calibrated per-sample contamination posterior. A learned input-dependent prior $π_φ(x)$ captures the spatial locality of contamination, so that samples near known corruptions are more likely to be flagged, while an Occam penalty emerges automatically and regularises against over-flagging. On CIFAR-10 with asymmetric label contamination, NBAM recovers the structure of the corruption process without supervision: the contamination posterior separates clean from corrupted samples, and the learned anomaly head identifies the direction of every label-flip pair. Alongside these capabilities, NBAM outperforms the four robust-loss baselines considered here at contamination rates 0.2-0.6.

Inaccurately labeled training data, or "label noise", poses a significant threat to the integrity of supervised machine learning models. This corruption directly degrades performance by teaching the model erroneous mappings between features and labels, which leads to poor generalization and reduced accuracy on properly labeled validation and test data. Current seismological applications mainly rely on large-scale training sets or data augmentation to reduce the label-noise impact, which can be labor-intensive and costly. Here, we introduce a Label Noise-Contrastive Robust Learning (LaNCoR) approach that can effectively handle noisy labels in seismic signal processing tasks, without requiring large-scale training datasets. In this approach, the input waveform feature and label representation distributions are aligned in the feature space to correct mislabeling and reduce its impact on the training process. We present LaNCoR's performance on the task of P-phase arrival-time picking of real microseismic data using two baseline models and training approaches. Our results indicate that LaNCoR can improve performance by up to 28.8% across performance metrics. This approach holds great promise for model training in seismology and geosciences.

Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit. We introduce CILN, a benchmark generation framework that creates IDN through controlled input corruptions. A diverse voter pool labels corrupted instances, producing benchmark datasets in which both the source and severity of ambiguity are explicit and controllable. Using CIFAR10, MNIST, and Adult, we construct 90 benchmark settings spanning multiple corruption families and severity levels. Our experiments show that the resulting benchmarks exhibit genuine instance-dependent noise, provide diverse confusion structures, and, on CIFAR-10, can produce label distributions that are closer to human uncertainty than an existing synthetic IDN benchmark. We further demonstrate that corruption-mediated IDN can expose failure modes of popular noisy-label learning methods, including Co-Teaching and DivideMix, that are not observed under comparable levels of rater-fallibility noise. These findings suggest that noise structure, not only noise rate, plays an important role in benchmark difficulty and algorithm behavior. By making ambiguity generation explicit and controllable, CILN provides a complementary benchmarking framework for studying noisy-label learning under diverse sources of instance difficulty.

Learning functional relationships from noisy data is a central problem in scientific inference. Spectral methods approximate unknown functions by expanding them in a basis and estimating the corresponding coefficients from data, but the stability of these coefficients under noise remains poorly understood. Here we study supervised regression with additive label noise using sparse spectral representations across multiple bases and dimensions. We show that noise induces a predictable drift in the learned coefficient vector whose magnitude depends on the effective number of active spectral modes. After whitening the empirical feature geometry, we derive a closed-form expression for the overlap between noisy and noiseless coefficient vectors, revealing a universal degradation curve governed by a single intrinsic noise scale. Numerical experiments across Fourier, Legendre, Bessel, and Haar bases confirm the theoretical prediction. The results demonstrate that spectral learning exhibits a fundamental noise threshold beyond which coefficient estimates become unstable, placing intrinsic limits on recovering functional structure from noisy data.

The performance of machine learning and deep learning models largely depends on the quality of the training data. However, the quality of the real-world datasets is often compromised by noisy labels, which can substantially degrade model accuracy and reliability. To address this challenge, we propose Relabeler, an end-to-end data-centric framework for detecting and correcting corrupted labels. For corrupted label detection, Relabeler jointly leverages both local and global relationships among data instances to identify potentially noisy samples. After detecting suspicious instances, Relabeler further performs label correction by estimating the most probable clean label for each instance based on both its input features and observed noisy label. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, noise types, and noise rates demonstrate that Relabeler consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving up to 58% improvement in label correction precision and 6% improvement in downstream task performance.

High-quality labeled data is essential for training reliable ML/DL models. However, real-world datasets often contain a considerable proportion of corrupted labels, which can severely degrade model performance. To address this problem, we propose CANOLA, a novel framework for correcting corrupted labels through noise-aware learning and iterative label refinement. CANOLA explicitly estimates the underlying noise distribution of the dataset and incorporates this information into the training of a noise-aware Deep Neural Network. By incorporating noise characteristics during learning, CANOLA enables the model to down-weight unreliable supervision signals and focus on trustworthy patterns, thereby improving robustness and generalization. Label correction is performed via cautious, iterative soft label refinement, in which model predictions are blended with observed labels to prevent premature or erroneous updates. This progressive refinement allows the dataset to be repaired in a stable and controlled manner. We evaluate CANOLA on six widely used datasets under realistic noisy labeling scenarios. Experimental results show that CANOLA consistently outperforms SOTA label correction methods, achieving relative improvements ranging from 19% to 52% in error reduction. Moreover, models trained on datasets corrected by CANOLA obtain substantial downstream performance gains. Even simple classifiers trained on CANOLA's corrected data can outperform complex model-centric approaches by margins of up to 67%.

Learning from imperfect data is a central theme in machine learning, connecting practical questions of robustness to fundamental questions of learnability. Here we examine attribute noise: learning from corrupted inputs while keeping the labels intact, a setting that has received considerably less analytical attention than its label-noise counterpart. We consider two types of corruption models: additive noise and replacement noise. Through experiments with multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) on corrupted classification datasets, we find that neural networks remain robust, maintaining well-above-chance accuracy even when inputs are >90% corrupted -- far beyond human recognition. To understand this robustness, we analyze infinite-width networks in the heavy-corruption regime using a mean-field-inspired approach and derive a leading-order decision rule for the classification outcome: the network implements a prototype rule, the nearest-class-mean, assigning each test point to the class whose training-set average it most closely resembles. This leading-order decision rule is universal across a broad range of MLP architectures, holding for any depth, as well as a wide class of activation functions and noise distributions. The same centroid mechanism closely matches finite-width network behavior in our experiments and provides an interpretable and analytically tractable account of why learning can succeed even when individual training examples carry almost no signal.

While Deep Active Learning (DAL) effectively reduces human annotation costs, its efficacy is constrained by human annotation errors. This is because the data sampled for active learning is assumed to be highly informative for training. When human annotators introduce errors into this informative data at a certain rate, the active learning performance drops significantly and, in some cases, even exhibits worse outcomes than passive learning. In this paper, we first analyze the impact of human annotation errors in the DAL setting. Then we propose a framework to address the human annotation noise problem for DAL. Informed by human learning patterns, the core idea of our proposed solution involves allocating a portion of the human annotation budget to re-annotate data that has already been labeled. Previous theoretical work suggests that when the model possesses a certain level of ability to identify potentially noisy data, even re-labeling a small fraction of the data can effectively remove noise from the active training set. To achieve this, we implement two active noise sampling strategies to detect noise under different circumstances and allocate a part of the annotation budget to re-annotate these instances. Our approach imbues active learning with a revisiting and introspective behavior. Our experiments demonstrate that, under the same annotation budget, our method is more data-efficient and yields a relatively noise-free annotation dataset in the end.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel in computer vision tasks given large annotated datasets. In real-world applications, however, labels are often corrupted by ambiguity, human error, or dynamic environments. Over-parameterized DNNs easily memorize these noisy labels during training, degrading model accuracy and generalization. Existing data-cleaning and sample-selection strategies often rely on manually specified thresholds, prior knowledge of the noise ratio, or a single metric (either learning dynamics or geometric structure), making them unstable in complex data regimes. This paper proposes a self-adaptive data-cleaning framework that integrates local, global, and learning dynamics cues for robust noisy-label detection. Samples are mapped into a unified low-dimensional feature space through a modular feature concatenation paradigm. We provide two instantiations: a 2D metric integrating class-adaptive KNN-based local disagreement with k-means-based global centroid distance, and a 3D multi-metric that additionally incorporates a z-normalized score. Unlike conventional 1D Gaussian Mixture Models applied to a single scalar metric, our framework performs multi-metric clustering on the feature space to adaptively partition samples into clean-dominant and noise-dominant components without requiring manual thresholds or noise priors. Experiments on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and ImageNet-100 with 5% to 40% symmetric label noise show high recall across settings, including near-perfect recall (>=98%) on ImageNet-100 at 40% noise. Subsequent training yields accuracy gains across evaluated settings, especially under severe corruption on ImageNet-100. These findings suggest that multi-metric integration provides a threshold-free, practical, and low-tuning strategy for noisy label detection.

Fraud detection in payment networks relies on labels generated through heterogeneous and imperfect observation processes, yet existing approaches treat fraud as a homogeneous binary variable. We show that this assumption is structurally incorrect and leads to provable inefficiency. We introduce an observation-mechanism taxonomy that partitions fraud into five classes, each defined by a distinct censorship and labeling pipeline. We prove that estimating fraud rates separately by class and aggregating strictly dominates pooled estimation, with the efficiency gap characterized as a Jensen penalty arising from heterogeneous observation rates. For each class, we derive the binding theoretical constraint on detection, including endogenous label corruption, structural non-observability, and feature non-informativeness. These results establish that fraud detection is fundamentally a collection of distinct estimation problems, each governed by its own observation structure and detection limit.

Data quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness of machine learning models. Label errors, present even in widely used benchmarks, introduce noise into training data and reduce model generalization. In this work, we conduct a comparative analysis of two automatic label error detection methods - Confident Learning and Dataset Cartography - on three Russian text classification corpora of varying size, number of classes, and domain: ru_emotion_e-culture (49,123 examples, emotion classification), RuCoLA (8,524 examples, linguistic acceptability), and TERRa (2,337 examples, textual entailment recognition). We use the pre-trained rubert-base-cased model fine-tuned on each corpus. To verify the meaningfulness of filtering, we conduct control experiments with random removal of an equivalent number of examples. Results show that the effectiveness of both methods depends strongly on dataset characteristics: on large corpora with low noise levels, filtering does not improve performance, while on small datasets with high noise, Confident Learning achieves a significant F1-macro improvement. Dataset Cartography demonstrates more conservative behavior, removing fewer examples. Across all corpora, targeted removal by both methods outperforms random removal, confirming the meaningfulness of the approaches.

Node classification on graphs often requires labeled nodes, yet obtaining labels at graph scale is expensive. When node attributes contain semantic content, such as paper abstracts, web pages, or product descriptions, large language models (LLMs) can provide low-cost supervision by annotating a small subset of nodes. However, these LLM-generated labels are noisy, and existing label-free graph learning methods usually treat this noise as either global or class-conditional. We find that LLM annotation errors are not only class-dependent but also region-dependent: within the same class, reliability can vary sharply across feature-space clusters. In light of this, we propose Cluster-Aware Noise Estimation (CANE), a label-free learning framework that estimates cluster-conditional LLM reliability without ground truth labels, and uses this estimate to decide which pseudo-labels to trust, and which labels to correct. Across various graph benchmarks and GNN backbones, CANE improves over the strongest label-free baselines, with the largest gains on datasets exhibiting stronger cluster-conditional noise.

Classical noisy-label theory predicts that downstream performance under weak supervision is bounded above by the labeler's accuracy, implying a sharp crossover: once a gold-trained classifier matches the labeler, weak labels stop helping and start hurting. The prediction is theoretical; what is missing is a benchmark calibration that turns it into an instance-level statement for modern foundation-model labelers. We provide such a calibration for BiomedCLIP-generated weak labels on three medical-imaging benchmarks (PCAM, ISIC, NIH-CXR) and six downstream architectures spanning an 11x parameter range. The crossover predicted by theory appears at ng~100 on PCAM, 20-50 on ISIC, and 250-500 on NIH-CXR; weak labels above the crossover degrade AUC by up to -0.10. The location is architecture-invariant for four of five pretrained architectures, and a within-family DenseNet sweep (2.5x parameters, identical pretraining) supports the view that the labeler, not the student, is the dominant constraint. The calibration in turn produces a decision rule operable from 10-20 gold labels: compare gold-only AUC to VLM accuracy on the user's gold set. A structured-vs-random noise sign flip on NIH-CXR shows that the rate-only formulation of the bound is incomplete and identifies a concrete refinement (label-space projection) that future benchmarks can be designed to test.

Learning from real-world data is frequently hindered by the compound challenge of long-tailed class distributions and noisy annotations. Existing methods partially address these issues but typically ignore the non-uniform impact of label noise across classes, resulting in ineffective correction for tail classes and over-regularization for head classes. To address this issue, we propose Class-Adaptive Rectification with Experts (CARE), a parameter-efficient framework that leverages three complementary supervision sources from vision-language models (VLM): observed noisy labels, VLM text embeddings, and visual features. CARE introduces a class-adaptive expert consensus mechanism that enforces stricter agreement for tail classes and more permissive agreement for head classes based on class frequency. By aggregating high-confidence predictions across these sources, CARE filters unreliable signals and recalibrates class distributions, yielding more reliable rectification under long-tailed distributions. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that CARE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 3.0% performance gains. The source code is available at https://github.com/qwq123-study/CARE.

Frozen Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) with lightweight classification heads are increasingly used in medical imaging because they offer efficient and reproducible deployment. Yet noisy-label learning methods for this frozen-feature regime remain poorly understood, and most existing methods still rely on a small-loss assumption inherited from end-to-end training. We present a controlled benchmark of eight noisy-label methods across five medical datasets, three backbones, two noise types, and five noise rates (150 conditions, 6,000 training runs), evaluated with balanced accuracy. The benchmark shows that there is no universal winner: Friedman ranking over the 150 conditions yields $χ^2 = 333.2$ ($p = 4.77 \times 10^{-68}$), ELR wins the most conditions (49/150), while CUFIT attains the best mean rank (2.51). The practical cost of method choice grows sharply with noise severity, from 4.5pp on clean data to 18.8pp at asymmetric 40% noise. To explain these benchmark-level patterns, we revisit the small-loss assumption in a representative high-risk regime. Under frozen DINOv2 features, clean and noisy loss distributions overlap by 53--61%, and matched-rate clean-sample detection shows that prediction agreement is markedly more stable than loss ranking under asymmetric noise (3pp vs.\ 13pp precision drop). On ISIC2019 with asymmetric 40% noise, Co-Teaching reaches 68% overall accuracy while collapsing to 35.1% balanced accuracy with zero recall on three minority classes. Together, these results recast noisy-label learning for frozen VFMs as a regime-aware method-selection problem rather than a search for a single dominant algorithm. We conclude with evidence-based guidance and a low-regret feature-space selector for practical recommendation.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) experience significant performance degradation when processing noisy labels, primarily due to overfitting on mislabeled data. Current mainstream approaches attempt to mitigate this issue by passively filtering clean samples during training. However, simple sample filtering within feature spaces degraded by noise struggles to distinguish between challenging samples and noisy samples, creating a bottleneck for model performance. We highlight for the first time the fundamental importance of actively reshaping feature space geometry for learning from noisy data. We propose a novel Geometry-aware Manifold Regularization Paradigm whose core idea is to explicitly construct energy barriers between data manifolds by actively synthesizing virtual outlier samples. By imposing geometric constraints that promote intra-class compactness and inter-class separation, this approach enhances the discriminability between hard and noisy samples, leading to the learning of more robust representations. Our regularization mechanism exhibits high universality, with effectiveness independent of any prior assumptions about noise patterns. It can be integrated as a standalone mechanism into existing sample selection frameworks, providing stronger robustness against diverse noisy environments. Experiments demonstrate that our paradigm achieves performance surpassing current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods on multiple benchmarks, including CIFAR-10, with particularly pronounced advantages under more challenging asymmetric noise conditions. Furthermore, this paradigm significantly enhances the model's capability in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection, ensuring superior reliability and safety for deployment in open-world scenarios.

Learning with noisy labels in multimedia classification often combines external annotations and model predictions into a single reliability weight, even though the two sources can fail for different reasons. We instead estimate disentangled reliabilities: bilevel meta-learning produces two batch-normalized scalars per sample, alpha for the given label and beta for the pseudo-label, without constraining them to sum to one. Holistic Reliability Propagation (HRP) then routes them to different objectives, using reliability-aware Mixup with global gating on the input branch and beta-gated pseudo-label positives on the contrastive branch. On synthetic and real-world benchmarks, HRP improves average accuracy over strong baselines and remains competitive at the highest noise rates.

Learning from implicit feedback in recommender systems is fundamentally challenged by pervasive label noise. While conventional denoising approaches often discard noisy instances to ensure robustness, this strategy inevitably suffers from low data utilization. Alternative methods that employ a Bayes-label transition matrix (BLTM) can leverage all available data, but their estimates tend to be biased in practical recommendation scenarios. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a Robust GMM-weighted Bayes-label Transition Matrix framework (RGBT). Our solution utilizes a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to derive instance-specific reliability scores, which systematically calibrate the BLTM estimation to mitigate bias. Theoretical analysis confirms that our approach, by leveraging the BLTM framework with GMM calibration, simultaneously ensures full sample utilization, delivers consistent estimation, and critically, achieves a significant reduction in estimation variance. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world and synthetically flipped datasets demonstrate that RGBT not only utilizes noisy samples more effectively than mainstream reliable sample-based denoising methods, but also achieves significantly superior calibration capability of the transition matrix compared to state-of-the-art transition matrix-based denoising approaches.

Labeling a training set is often expensive and susceptible to errors, making the design of robust loss functions for label noise an important problem. The symmetry condition provides theoretical guarantees for robustness to such noise. In this work, we study a symmetrization method arising from the unique decomposition of any multi-class loss function into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term. In particular, symmetrizing the cross-entropy loss leads to a linear multi-class extension of the unhinged loss. Unlike in the binary case, the multi-class version must have specific coefficients in order to satisfy the symmetry condition. Under suitable assumptions, we show that this multi-class unhinged loss is the unique convex multi-class symmetric loss. We also show that it has a fundamental local role: the linear approximation of any symmetric loss around score vectors with equal components is equivalent to the multi-class unhinged loss. We then introduce SGCE and alpha-MAE, two loss functions that interpolate between the multi-class unhinged loss and the Mean Absolute Error while allowing control of the beta-smoothness of the loss. Experiments on standard noisy-label benchmarks show competitive performance compared with existing robust loss functions.

Training a deep neural network with noisy labels could reduce data annotation cost but may introduce noise into the learned model. In meta label correction approaches, an additional meta model besides the main model is trained with a small, clean dataset to correct the large, noisy dataset. However, the update of the meta model requires the computation of hypergradients at the inner step of the main model which signif- icantly increases the computational cost. To improve the training efficiency, we first introduce the dynamic barrier gradient descent into standard meta label correction. While this naive extenstion is able to speed up the training process to approximately first- order complexity, it lacks mechanisms to prevent the leakage of noisy signals to the main model and to stabilize the learning of the meta model. Based on this observation, we propose the EBOMLC method, which is designed with three key improvements including one-step inner loop update, mixture upper loss and alignment- aware dynamic barrier. Empirical results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 demonstrate that EBOMLC consistently outperforms other baselines, especially under high noise rate settings, while reducing training time of the meta label correction approach.

Learning with noisy labels (LNL) is typically benchmarked by closed-set classification accuracy, yet deployment often requires classifiers to reject out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We present a learner-agnostic ACC-OOD benchmark that freezes LNL checkpoints and evaluates them with standardized near-/far-OOD routing and post-hoc scores across synthetic and real label noise. The benchmark reveals a recurring failure mode: high closed-set accuracy does not ensure OOD reliability, because low-confidence, misclassified in-distribution samples can overlap the score and feature regions occupied by OOD inputs under noisy training. We term this pathology uncertainty collapse. This structural overlap can make high-accuracy LNL methods lose separability at the ID-error/OOD interface under standard OOD scores. As an intervention, we study Virtual Margin Regularization (VMR), a lightweight repair probe demonstrated mainly with PSSCL that synthesizes boundary virtual outliers on trusted ID batches and widens the energy margin. VMR partially reduces the collapse-induced far-OOD failure without replacing the host objective or sacrificing closed-set accuracy in the tested settings. These results support LNL benchmarks that co-report closed-set generalization, open-world reliability, and structural overlap diagnostics.

Noisy-label methods often estimate sample reliability from forward-space signals such as loss, confidence, or entropy. These signals indicate whether a sample is difficult to predict, but they do not directly test whether its observed label induces a reliable parameter update. This gap matters because hard clean samples and mislabeled samples can have similar loss while inducing different updates. We recast reliability estimation as diagnosis of the observed-label update. The sample-wise empirical Fisher trace gives a backward-space measure of update energy: for the classifier layer, it factorizes into a prediction-residual term and a feature-sensitivity term, so it captures information beyond scalar loss. Trace, however, is still a radial magnitude signal and cannot decide whether a large update is useful or harmful. We therefore propose Relative Geometric Conflict (RGC), which compares the observed-label gradient with a reference gradient induced by an EMA teacher. The conflict term helps distinguish large but aligned hard-clean updates from large conflicting updates caused by corrupted labels. Across synthetic and real-world noisy-label benchmarks, RGC improves hard-clean preservation and accuracy under our evaluation protocol.

The paradigm of learning from automatic annotations driven by pre-trained experts and Foundation Models dominates data-hungry applications. However, it introduces a critical challenge: model-induced label noise. Unlike stochastic noise in classical robust learning, this noise stems from annotator inductive biases, manifesting as systematic errors tightly coupled with local feature manifolds. Existing methods relying on global transition matrices underfit these structural patterns, while learning instance-specific matrices remains mathematically intractable. We propose Model-Induced Noise Decoupling (MIND), a theoretically grounded framework addressing this dilemma. We demonstrate that the high-dimensional noise manifold can be decoupled into tractable, subspace-dependent components via Latent Manifold Disentanglement. Specifically, our Latent Decoupling Estimator (LDE) dynamically projects samples into latent structural clusters with consistent error modes, facilitating noise identifiability without ground-truth anchor points. To rigorously evaluate robustness, we adopt a hierarchical protocol: moving from controlled noise on CIFAR-100 to a structural stress test on large-scale real-world 3D datasets (S3DIS, ScanNet), where error patterns explicitly couple with geometric manifolds. Empirically, MIND significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on these complex benchmarks and effectively corrects zero-shot hallucinations from Vision-Language Models (e.g., OpenSeg), highlighting its potential as a robust distillation framework for Foundation Models.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) suffer from over-squashing in deep message passing, where information from exponentially growing neighborhoods is compressed into fixed-dimensional representations. We show that this issue becomes a distinct failure mode in multi-label graphs: neighboring nodes often share only limited labels while differing across many irrelevant ones, causing predictive signals to be diluted by noisy label information. To address this challenge, we propose the Multi-Label Graph Information Bottleneck (MLGIB), which formulates multi-label message passing as constrained information transmission under irrelevant label noise. MLGIB balances expressiveness and robustness by preserving predictive label signals while suppressing irrelevant noise. Specifically, it constructs a Markovian dependence space and derives tractable variational bounds, where the lower bound maximizes mutual information with target labels and the upper bound constrains redundant source information. These bounds lead to an end-to-end label-aware message-passing architecture. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over existing methods, validating the effectiveness and generality of the proposed framework.

In large-scale visual recognition and data mining tasks, the presence of noisy labels severely undermines the generalization capability of deep neural networks (DNNs). Prevalent sample selection methods rely primarily on training loss or prediction confidence for passive screening. However, within a feature space degraded by noise, decision boundaries undergo systematic boundary collapse. This phenomenon hinders the ability of the model to distinguish between hard clean samples and noisy samples at the decision margins, thereby creating a significant performance bottleneck. This study is the first to emphasize the pivotal importance of active boundary restoration for noise-robust learning. We propose HamBR, a novel paradigm based on Hamiltonian dynamics. The core approach leverages the Spherical Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (Spherical HMC) mechanism to actively probe inter-class ambiguous regions within the representation space and synthesize high-quality virtual outliers. By imposing explicit repulsion constraints via energy-based modeling, these synthesized samples establish robust energy barriers at the decision boundaries. This mechanism forces real samples to move from dispersed overlapping regions toward their respective class centers, thereby restoring the discriminative sharpness of the decision boundaries. HamBR demonstrates exceptional versatility and can be integrated as a plug-and-play defense module into existing semi-supervised noisy label learning frameworks. Empirical evaluations show that the proposed paradigm significantly enhances the discriminative accuracy of hard boundary samples, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on CIFAR-10/100 and real-world noise benchmarks. Furthermore, it exhibits superior convergence efficiency and reliable robustness, while improving significantly the capability of the model for Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection.

Noisy labels are common in large-scale medical imaging datasets due to inter-observer variability and ambiguous cases. We propose a statistically grounded and task-agnostic framework, Standardized Loss Aggregation (SLA), for detecting noisy labels at the sample level. SLA quantifies label reliability by aggregating standardized fold-level validation losses across repeated cross-validation runs. This formulation generalizes discrete hard-counting schemes into a continuous estimator that captures both the frequency and magnitude of performance deviations, yielding interpretable and statistically stable noisiness scores. Experiments on a public fundus dataset demonstrate that SLA consistently outperforms the hard-counting baseline across all noise levels and converges substantially faster, especially under low noise ratios where subtle loss variations are informative. Samples with high SLA scores indicate potentially ambiguous or mislabeled cases, guiding efficient re-annotation and improving dataset reliability for any classification task.

Label noise remains a critical bottleneck for the generalization of supervised deep learning models, particularly when errors are structured rather than random. Standard robust training methods often fail in the presence of such semantically proximal classification errors. This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers, yielding the bi-Lipschitz-constrained Bayesian Vision Transformer (LipB-ViT). In contrast to conventional Bayesian layers, our approach enforces spectral normalization on both the mean and log-variance of the variational weights, which promotes calibrated predictive uncertainty and mitigates noise amplification. We further propose a novel metric to jointly capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme that combines feature-space proximity with predictive uncertainty to detect corrupted labels outperforming the state of the art k-nearest neighbor based identification methods by more than 7% reaching a recall of more than 0.93 at 15% semantically misclassified labels. Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones and consistent hyperparameters across domains, suggesting strong utility for high-stakes applications with variable annotation reliability. The stabilized confidence estimates serve as the foundation for an analysis pipeline that jointly assesses dataset quality and label noise, yielding a second novel metric for their combined quantification. Lastly, we systematically evaluate LipB-ViT under both structured (adversarial) and unstructured noise at inference time, demonstrating its robustness in realistic high-noise and attack scenarios. We compare its performance against baseline methods.

Gradient boosting remains a strong and widely used method for tabular data learning, but its performance often degrades when training labels are noisy. This behavior is largely related to the way boosting algorithms emphasize samples with large gradients, without explicitly accounting for whether such errors originate from informative hard cases or from unreliable labels. We address this issue by reconsidering how sample reliability is evaluated during boosting. Instead of relying on instantaneous error, we examine the evolution of each sample's residuals across iterations. Based on this insight, we propose Information-Theoretic Trust Boosting (ITBoost), which uses the Minimum Description Length principle to measure the complexity of residual trajectories. Samples whose residual patterns fluctuate in an irregular manner are treated as less trustworthy and are down-weighted during learning. Theoretically, we derive a tighter generalization bound for ITBoost under label noise. Empirical results on various tabular benchmarks indicate that ITBoost provides improved robustness in noisy environments over leading boosting and deep tabular models, while retaining best average performance on clean data.

The performance of machine learning models often relies on large labeled datasets; however, data collected from diverse sources can contain label noise. Recent work has shown that, in noisy settings, there may exist a subset of the training data on which models can achieve performance comparable to training on a noise-free dataset. A widely used method for identifying such subsets is cutstats, which employs k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) to detect low-noise samples. However, its performance on high-dimensional data remains largely unexplored. In this work, we formally establish that the performance of a classifier trained on a subset of a noisy dataset selected via cutstats is influenced by the accuracy of k-NN. We further demonstrate that, in noisy environments, exploiting data invariance and knowledge of underlying symmetries can significantly enhance the performance of k-NN, bringing it closer to the Bayes optimal classifier even in high-dimensional regimes. Finally, we show that for real-world scenarios, where information about the underlying invariance is only partially known, learnt invariant representations can still facilitate the identification of near-optimal subsets.