PDE Surrogate Modeling
PDE: Partial Differential Equation
Overview
PDE surrogate modeling studies how to approximate the mapping from physical conditions, geometry, and parameters to a PDE’s solution, reducing the cost of repeated simulations. Methods range from reduced-order models such as POD and latent dynamics to neural operators such as Fourier Neural Operators and DeepONets, as well as mesh-based graph networks, transformers, and generative models. Many approaches combine these learned models with physical structure, including conservation laws, symmetries, boundary conditions, and numerical solvers, to improve reliability and support inverse problems or design optimization. A central challenge is balancing speed with accuracy under new geometries or regimes, stable long rollouts, fine-scale fidelity, and calibrated uncertainty; whether a surrogate saves time overall depends on training and deployment costs as well as inference speed.
Latest papers
331 papers50 papers in the last four weeks, up 72% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
Agentic Exploration of PDE Spaces using Latent Foundation Models for Parameterized Simulations
Learning Physical Operators using Neural Operators
Surrogate models for Rock-Fluid Interaction: A Grid-Size-Invariant Approach
NESTOR: A Nested MOE-based Neural Operator for Large-Scale PDE Pre-Training
Structure-Aware Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operator PDE Surrogates
Shape-informed cardiac mechanics surrogates in data-scarce regimes via geometric encoding and generative augmentation
SGNO: Spectral Generator Neural Operator for Long-Horizon PDE Prediction
A Deep Surrogate Model for Robust and Generalizable Long-Term Blast Wave Prediction
Multi-material Multi-physics Topology Optimization with Physics-informed Gaussian Process Priors
Flowers: A Warp Drive for Neural PDE Solvers
Learning Data-Efficient and Generalizable Neural Operators via Fundamental Physics Knowledge
PDE foundation models are skillful AI weather emulators for the Martian atmosphere
Adjoint-based shape optimization of a ship hull using a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) assisted propulsion surrogate model
Solving Inverse Parametrized Problems via Finite Elements and Extreme Learning Networks
GenPANIS: A Latent-Variable Generative Framework for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems in Multiphase Media
Stabilizing Physics-Informed Consistency Models via Structure-Preserving Training
Transolver-3: Scaling Up Transformer Solvers to Industrial-Scale Geometries
SFO: Learning PDE Operators via Spectral Filtering
PGOT: A Physics-Geometry Operator Transformer for Complex PDEs
Spectral Embedding via Chebyshev Bases for Robust DeepONet Approximation
Efficient Generative Transformer Operators For Million-Point PDEs
Conditional Clifford-Steerable CNNs for PDE Modeling
A Flow-rate-conserving CNN-based Domain Decomposition Method for Blood Flow Simulations
Blending data and physics for reduced-order modeling of systems with spatiotemporal chaotic dynamics
DPG loss functions for learning parameter-to-solution maps by neural networks
Surrogate Modeling of 3D Rayleigh-Benard Convection with Equivariant Autoencoders
Latent Evolution Operator (LEO): State-to-State Forecasting of Parametric PDEs
Fast localized urban microclimate emulator: wind and temperatures in unseen urban morphologies
Residuals Are Not Enough: Limits of Physics-Informed Pre-Training for Scientific Foundation Models
nice,'' e.g., structured, well-aligned settings: it enhances generalization and reduces data dependence, compared to data-only pre-training. However, these advantages diminish significantly as the downstream tasks become harder,'' e.g., as they involve discontinuities or deviate from the pre-training distribution. In complex or structurally different problems, such as those involving new boundary conditions or PDE operators, physics-informed models may perform only on par with---or even worse---than data-driven baselines. While residual-based pre-training helps in idealized regimes, realizing broadly transferable SciFMs will likely require subtler spatiotemporal inductive biases and more principled integration of physical knowledge into model architectures.