Prompt Engineering

Large language models (LLMs) in research and development toolchains produce output that triggers attribution of agency and understanding -- a cognitive illusion that degrades verification behavior and trust calibration. No existing mitigation provides a systematic, deployable constraint set for output register. This paper proposes seven output-side rules, each targeting a documented linguistic mechanism, and validates them empirically. In 780 two-turn conversations (constrained vs. default register, 30 tasks, 13 replicates, 1560 API calls), anthropomorphic markers dropped from 1233 to 33 (>97% reduction, p < 0.001), outputs were 49% shorter by word count, and adapted AnthroScore confirmed the shift toward machine register (-1.94 vs. -0.96, p < 0.001). The rules are implemented as a configuration-file system prompt requiring no model modification; validation uses a single model (Claude Sonnet 4). Output quality under the constrained register was not evaluated. The mechanism is extensible to other domains.

Graphs are a central representation in biomedical research, capturing molecular interaction networks, gene regulatory circuits, cell--cell communication maps, and knowledge graphs. Despite their importance, currently there is not a broadly reusable foundation model available for graph analysis comparable to those that have transformed language and vision. Existing graph neural networks are typically trained on a single dataset and learn representations specific only to that graph's node features, topology, and label space, limiting their ability to transfer across domains. This lack of generalization is particularly problematic in biology and medicine, where networks vary substantially across cohorts, assays, and institutions. Here we introduce a graph foundation model designed to learn transferable structural representations that are not specific to specific node identities or feature schemes. Our approach leverages feature-agnostic graph properties, including degree statistics, centrality measures, community structure indicators, and diffusion-based signatures, and encodes them as structural prompts. These prompts are integrated with a message-passing backbone to embed diverse graphs into a shared representation space. The model is pretrained once on heterogeneous graphs and subsequently reused on unseen datasets with minimal adaptation. Across multiple benchmarks, our pretrained model matches or exceeds strong supervised baselines while demonstrating superior zero-shot and few-shot generalization on held-out graphs. On the SagePPI benchmark, supervised fine-tuning of the pretrained backbone achieves a mean ROC-AUC of 95.5%, a gain of 21.8% over the best supervised message-passing baseline. The proposed technique thus provides a unique approach toward reusable, foundation-scale models for graph-structured data in biomedical and network science applications.

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) introduces new considerations for English as a foreign language (EFL) writing pedagogy. This study explores how students talk to and through AI by prompt engineering and negotiating authorship, respectively, and whether any patterns in the latter relate to students' writing performance. Using an exploratory mixed methods design, we analyzed screen recordings of 44 Hong Kong secondary students completing a Curricular Writing Task with AI Chatbots. Content analysis identified ten types of prompting strategies students employed, including questions, searches, and detailed instructions. From clustering these strategies, three distinct profiles of human-AI rhetorical load responsibility emerged: AI-dominant (52% of students), Human-dominant (25%) and Collaborative human-AI (14%). A MANOVA analysis indicated no significant multivariate effect of rhetorical load responsibility on three dimensions of students' writing performance: content, language, and organization. Students' prompting strategies and rhetorical load responsibility patterns have implications for their engagement and autonomy in EFL writing pedagogy.

The quality of AI-generated output is often attributed to prompting technique, but extensive empirical observation suggests that context completeness may be more strongly associated with output quality. This paper introduces Context Engineering, a structured methodology for assembling, declaring, and sequencing the complete informational payload that accompanies a prompt to an AI tool. Context Engineering defines a five-role context package structure (Authority, Exemplar, Constraint, Rubric, Metadata), applies a staged four-phase pipeline (Reviewer to Design to Builder to Auditor), and applies formal models from reliability engineering and information theory as post hoc interpretive lenses on context quality. In an observational study of 200 documented interactions across four AI tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Cowork, Codex), incomplete context was associated with 72% of iteration cycles. Structured context assembly was associated with a reduction from 3.8 to 2.0 average iteration cycles per task and an improvement in first-pass acceptance from 32% to 55%. Among structured interactions, 110 of 200 were accepted on first pass compared with 16 of 50 baseline interactions; when iteration was permitted, the final success rate reached 91.5% (183 of 200). These results are observational and reflect a single-operator dataset without controlled comparison. Preliminary corroboration is provided by a companion production automation system with eleven operating lanes and 2,132 classified tickets.

AI coding agents select frameworks, scaffold infrastructure, and wire integrations, often in seconds. These are architectural decisions, yet almost no one reviews them as such. We identify five mechanisms by which agents make implicit architectural choices and propose six prompt-architecture coupling patterns that map natural-language prompt features to the infrastructure they require. The patterns range from contingent couplings (structured output validation) that may weaken as models improve to fundamental ones (tool-call orchestration) that persist regardless of model capability. An illustrative demonstration confirms that prompt wording alone produces structurally different systems for the same task. We term the phenomenon vibe architecting, architecture shaped by prompts rather than deliberate design, and outline review practices, decision records, and tooling to bring these hidden decisions under governance.

Masked diffusion language models (dLMs) generate text through bidirectional denoising, yet this capability remains locked for infilling prompts. This limitation is an artifact of the current supervised finetuning (SFT) convention of applying response-only masking. To unlock this capability, we extend full-sequence masking during SFT, where both prompts and responses are masked jointly. Once unlocked, the model infills masked portions of a prompt template conditioned on few-shot examples. We show that such model-infilled prompts match or surpass manually designed templates, transfer effectively across models, and are complementary to existing prompt optimization methods. Our results suggest that training practices, not architectural limitations, are the primary bottleneck preventing masked diffusion language models from infilling effective prompts

Large language model (LLM) performance depends heavily on prompt design, yet prompt construction is often described and applied inconsistently. Our purpose was to derive a reference framework for structuring LLM prompts. This paper presents PICCO, a framework derived through a rigorous synthesis of 11 previously published prompting frameworks identified through a multi-database search. The analysis yields two main contributions. First, it proposes a taxonomy that distinguishes prompt frameworks, prompt elements, prompt generation, prompting techniques, and prompt engineering as related but non-equivalent concepts. Second, it derives a five-element reference architecture for prompt generation: Persona, Instructions, Context, Constraints, and Output (PICCO). For each element, we define its function, scope, and relationship to other elements, with the goal of improving conceptual clarity and supporting more systematic prompt design. Finally, to support application of the framework, we outline key concepts relevant to implementation, including prompting techniques (e.g., zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, ensembling, decomposition, and self-critique, with selected variants), human and automated approaches to iterative prompt engineering, responsible prompting considerations such as security, privacy, bias, and trust, and priorities for future research. This work is a conceptual and methodological contribution: it formalizes a common structure for prompt specification and comparison, but does not claim empirical validation of PICCO as an optimization method.

Large language models exhibit sycophancy: the tendency to shift outputs toward user-expressed stances, regardless of correctness or consistency. While prior work has studied this issue and its impacts, rigorous computational linguistic metrics are needed to identify when models are being sycophantic. Here, we introduce SWAY, an unsupervised computational linguistic measure of sycophancy. We develop a counterfactual prompting mechanism to identify how much a model's agreement shifts under positive versus negative linguistic pressure, isolating framing effects from content. Applying this metric to benchmark 6 models, we find that sycophancy increases with epistemic commitment. Leveraging our metric, we introduce a counterfactual mitigation strategy teaching models to consider what the answer would be if opposite assumptions were suggested. While baseline mitigation instructing to be explicitly anti-sycophantic yields moderate reductions, and can backfire, our counterfactual CoT mitigation drives sycophancy to near zero across models, commitment levels, and clause types, while not suppressing responsiveness to genuine evidence. Overall, we contribute a metric for benchmarking sycophancy and a mitigation informed by it.

GNN prompting aims to adapt models across tasks and graphs without requiring extensive retraining. However, most existing graph prompt methods still require task-specific parameter updates and face the issue of generalizing across graphs, limiting their performance and undermining the core promise of prompting. In this work, we introduce a Cross-graph Tuning-free Prompting Framework (CTP), which supports both homogeneous and heterogeneous graphs, can be directly deployed to unseen graphs without further parameter tuning, and thus enables a plug-and-play GNN inference engine. Extensive experiments on few-shot prediction tasks show that, compared to SOTAs, CTP achieves an average accuracy gain of 30.8% and a maximum gain of 54%, confirming its effectiveness and offering a new perspective on graph prompt learning.

When testing data and training data come from different distributions, deep neural networks (DNNs) will face significant safety risks in practical applications. Therefore, out-of-distribution (OOD) detection techniques, which can identify OOD samples at test time and alert the system, are urgently needed. Existing graph OOD detection methods usually characterize fine-grained in-distribution (ID) patterns from multiple perspectives, and train end-to-end graph neural networks (GNNs) for prediction. However, due to the unavailability of OOD data during training, the absence of explicit supervision signals could lead to sub-optimal performance of end-to-end encoders. To address this issue, we follow the pre-training+prompting paradigm to utilize pre-trained GNN encoders, and propose Disentangled Graph Prompting (DGP), to capture fine-grained ID patterns with the help of ID graph labels. Specifically, we design two prompt generators that respectively generate class-specific and class-agnostic prompt graphs by modifying the edge weights of an input graph. We also design several effective losses to train the prompt generators and prevent trivial solutions. We conduct extensive experiments on ten datasets to demonstrate the superiority of our proposed DGP, which achieves a relative AUC improvement of 3.63% over the best graph OOD detection baseline. Ablation studies and hyper-parameter experiments further show the effectiveness of DGP. Code is available at https://github.com/BUPT-GAMMA/DGP.

Political scientists are rapidly adopting large language models (LLMs) for text annotation, yet the sensitivity of annotation results to implementation choices remains poorly understood. Most evaluations test a single model or configuration; how model choice, model size, learning approach, and prompt style interact, and whether popular "best practices" survive controlled comparison, are largely unexplored. We present a controlled evaluation of these pipeline choices, testing six open-weight models across four political science annotation tasks under identical quantisation, hardware, and prompt-template conditions. Our central finding is methodological: interaction effects dominate main effects, so seemingly reasonable pipeline choices can become consequential researcher degrees of freedom. No single model, prompt style, or learning approach is uniformly superior, and the best-performing model varies across tasks. Two corollaries follow. First, model size is an unreliable guide both to cost and to performance: cross-family efficiency differences are so large that some larger models are less resource-intensive than much smaller alternatives, while within model families mid-range variants often match or exceed larger counterparts. Second, widely recommended prompt engineering techniques yield inconsistent and sometimes negative effects on annotation performance. We use these benchmark results to develop a validation-first framework - with a principled ordering of pipeline decisions, guidance on prompt freezing and held-out evaluation, reporting standards, and open-source tools - to help researchers navigate this decision space transparently.

Domain-driven design (DDD) is a powerful design technique for architecting complex software systems. This paper introduces a prompting framework that automates core DDD activities through structured large language model (LLM) interactions. We decompose DDD into five sequential steps: (1) establishing an ubiquitous language, (2) simulating event storming, (3) identifying bounded contexts, (4) designing aggregates, and (5) mapping to technical architecture. In a case study, we validated the prompting framework against real-world requirements from FTAPI's enterprise platform. While the first steps consistently generate valuable and usable artifacts, later steps show how minor errors or inaccuracies can propagate and accumulate. Overall, the framework excels as a collaborative sparring partner for building actionable documentation, such as glossaries and context maps, but not for full automation. This allows the experts to concentrate their discussion on the critical trade-offs. In our evaluation, Steps 1 to 3 worked well, but the accumulated errors rendered the artifacts generated from Steps 4 and 5 impractical. Our findings show that LLMs can enhance, but not replace, architectural expertise, offering a practical tool to reduce the effort and overhead of DDD while preserving human-centric decision-making.

LLM performance is highly sensitive to prompt design, yet whether automatic prompt optimization can replace expert prompt engineering in linguistic tasks remains unexplored. We present the first systematic comparison of hand-crafted zero-shot expert prompts, base DSPy signatures, and GEPA-optimized DSPy signatures across translation, terminology insertion, and language quality assessment, evaluating five model configurations. Results are task-dependent. In terminology insertion, optimized and manual prompts produce mostly statistically indistinguishable quality. In translation, each approach wins on different models. In LQA, expert prompts achieve stronger error detection while optimization improves characterization. Across all tasks, GEPA elevates minimal DSPy signatures, and the majority of expert-optimized comparisons show no statistically significant difference. We note that the comparison is asymmetric: GEPA optimization searches programmatically over gold-standard splits, whereas expert prompts require in principle no labeled data, relying instead on domain expertise and iterative refinement.

System prompt configuration can make the difference between near-total phishing blindness and near-perfect detection in LLM email agents. We present PhishNChips, a study of 11 models under 10 prompt strategies, showing that prompt-model interaction is a first-order security variable: a single model's phishing bypass rate ranges from under 1% to 97% depending on how it is configured, while the false-positive cost of the same prompt varies sharply across models. We then show that optimizing prompts around highly predictive signals can improve benchmark performance, reaching up to 93.7% recall at 3.8% false positive rate, but also creates a brittle attack surface. In particular, domain-matching strategies perform well when legitimate emails mostly have matched sender and URL domains, yet degrade sharply when attackers invert that signal by registering matching infrastructure. Response-trace analysis shows that 98% of successful bypasses reason in ways consistent with the inverted signal: the models are following the instruction, but the instruction's core assumption has become false. A counter-intuitive corollary follows: making prompts more specific can degrade already-capable models by replacing broader multi-signal reasoning with exploitable single-signal dependence. We characterize the resulting tension between detection, usability, and adversarial robustness as a navigable tradeoff, introduce Safetility, a deployability-aware metric that penalizes false positives, and argue that closing the adversarial gap likely requires tool augmentation with external ground truth.

Conventional few-shot medical image segmentation (FSMIS) approaches face performance bottlenecks that hinder broader clinical applicability. Although the Segment Anything Model (SAM) exhibits strong category-agnostic segmentation capabilities, its direct application to medical images often leads to over-segmentation due to ambiguous anatomical boundaries. In this paper, we reformulate SAM-based FSMIS as a prompt localization task and propose FoB (Focus on Background), a background-centric prompt generator that provides accurate background prompts to constrain SAM's over-segmentation. Specifically, FoB bridges the gap between segmentation and prompt localization by category-agnostic generation of support background prompts and localizing them directly in the query image. To address the challenge of prompt localization for novel categories, FoB models rich contextual information to capture foreground-background spatial dependencies. Moreover, inspired by the inherent structural patterns of background prompts in medical images, FoB models this structure as a constraint to progressively refine background prompt predictions. Experiments on three diverse medical image datasets demonstrate that FoB outperforms other baselines by large margins, achieving state-of-the-art performance on FSMIS, and exhibiting strong cross-domain generalization. Our code is available at https://github.com/primebo1/FoB_SAM.

This paper presents a novel prompt engineering framework for trait specific Automatic Essay Scoring (AES) in Arabic, leveraging large language models (LLMs) under zero-shot and few-shot configurations. Addressing the scarcity of scalable, linguistically informed AES tools for Arabic, we introduce a three-tier prompting strategy (standard, hybrid, and rubric-guided) that guides LLMs in evaluating distinct language proficiency traits such as organization, vocabulary, development, and style. The hybrid approach simulates multi-agent evaluation with trait specialist raters, while the rubric-guided method incorporates scored exemplars to enhance model alignment. In zero and few-shot settings, we evaluate eight LLMs on the QAES dataset, the first publicly available Arabic AES resource with trait level annotations. Experimental results using Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) and Confidence Intervals show that Fanar-1-9B-Instruct achieves the highest trait level agreement in both zero and few-shot prompting (QWK = 0.28 and CI = 0.41), with rubric-guided prompting yielding consistent gains across all traits and models. Discourse-level traits such as Development and Style showed the greatest improvements. These findings confirm that structured prompting, not model scale alone, enables effective AES in Arabic. Our study presents the first comprehensive framework for proficiency oriented Arabic AES and sets the foundation for scalable assessment in low resource educational contexts.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to write and refactor research code, expanding computational workflows. At the same time, Green AI research has largely measured the footprint of models rather than the downstream workflows in which GenAI is a tool. We shift the unit of analysis from models to workflows and treat prompts as decision policies that allocate discretion between researcher and system, governing what is executed and when iteration stops. We contribute in two ways. First, we map the recent Green AI literature into seven themes: training footprint is the largest cluster, while inference efficiency and system level optimisation are growing rapidly, alongside measurement protocols, green algorithms, governance, and security and efficiency trade-offs. Second, we benchmark a modern economic survey workflow, an LDA-based literature mapping implemented with GenAI assisted coding and executed in a fixed cloud notebook, measuring runtime and estimated CO2e with CodeCarbon. Injecting generic green language into prompts has no reliable effect, whereas operational constraints and decision rule prompts deliver large and stable footprint reductions while preserving decision equivalent topic outputs. The results identify human in the loop governance as a practical lever to align GenAI productivity with environmental efficiency.

This Monte Carlo simulation examines how prompt engineering strategies shape the quality of large language model (LLM)--generated personality assessment items within the AI-GENIE framework for generative psychometrics. Item pools targeting the Big Five traits were generated using multiple prompting designs (zero-shot, few-shot, persona-based, and adaptive), model temperatures, and LLMs, then evaluated and reduced using network psychometric methods. Across all conditions, AI-GENIE reliably improved structural validity following reduction, with the magnitude of its incremental contribution inversely related to the quality of the incoming item pool. Prompt design exerted a substantial influence on both pre- and post-reduction item quality. Adaptive prompting consistently outperformed non-adaptive strategies by sharply reducing semantic redundancy, elevating pre-reduction structural validity, and preserving substantially larger item pool, particularly when paired with newer, higher-capacity models. These gains were robust across temperature settings for most models, indicating that adaptive prompting mitigates common trade-offs between creativity and psychometric coherence. An exception was observed for the GPT-4o model at high temperatures, suggesting model-specific sensitivity to adaptive constraints at elevated stochasticity. Overall, the findings demonstrate that adaptive prompting is the strongest approach in this context, and that its benefits scale with model capability, motivating continued investigation of model--prompt interactions in generative psychometric pipelines.

Prompt engineering has become a production critical component of generative AI systems. However, organizations still lack a shared, auditable method to qualify prompt assets against operational objectives, safety constraints, and compliance requirements. This paper introduces Prompt Readiness Levels (PRL), a nine level maturity scale inspired by TRL, and the Prompt Readiness Score (PRS), a multidimensional scoring method with gating thresholds designed to prevent weak link failure modes. PRL/PRS provide an original, structured and methodological framework for governing prompt assets specification, testing, traceability, security evaluation, and deployment readiness enabling valuation of prompt engineering through reproducible qualification decisions across teams and industries.

Word sense plausibility rating requires predicting the human-perceived plausibility of a given word sense on a 1-5 scale in the context of short narrative stories containing ambiguous homonyms. This paper systematically compares three approaches: (1) embedding-based methods pairing sentence embeddings with standard regressors, (2) transformer fine-tuning with parameter-efficient adaptation, and (3) large language model (LLM) prompting with structured reasoning and explicit decision rules. The best-performing system employs a structured prompting strategy that decomposes evaluation into narrative components (precontext, target sentence, ending) and applies explicit decision rules for rating calibration. The analysis reveals that structured prompting with decision rules outperforms both fine-tuned models and embedding-based approaches, and that prompt design matters more than model scale for this task.

Digital dentistry has made significant advances with the advent of deep learning. However, the majority of these deep learning-based dental image analysis models focus on very specific tasks such as tooth segmentation, tooth detection, cavity detection, and gingivitis classification. There is a lack of a specialized model that has holistic knowledge of teeth and can perform dental image analysis tasks based on that knowledge. Datasets of dental images with captions can help build such a model. To the best of our knowledge, existing dental image datasets with captions are few in number and limited in scope. In many of these datasets, the captions describe the entire mouth, while the images are limited to the anterior view. As a result, posterior teeth such as molars are not clearly visible, limiting the usefulness of the captions for training vision-language models. Additionally, the captions focus only on a specific disease (gingivitis) and do not provide a holistic assessment of each tooth. Moreover, tooth disease scores are typically assigned to individual teeth, and each tooth is treated as a separate entity in orthodontic procedures. Therefore, it is important to have captions for single-tooth images. As far as we know, no such dataset of single-tooth images with dental captions exists. In this work, we aim to bridge that gap by assessing the possibility of generating captions for dental images using Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and evaluating the extent and quality of those captions. Our findings suggest that guided prompts help VLMs generate meaningful captions. We show that the prompts generated by our framework are better anchored in describing the visual aspects of dental images. We selected RGB images as they have greater potential in consumer scenarios.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive general competence in video understanding, yet their reliability for real-world Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) remains largely unexplored. Unlike conventional pipelines relying on reconstruction or pose-based cues, MLLMs enable a paradigm shift: treating anomaly detection as a language-guided reasoning task. In this work, we systematically evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs on the ShanghaiTech and CHAD benchmarks by reformulating VAD as a binary classification task under weak temporal supervision. We investigate how prompt specificity and temporal window lengths (1s--3s) influence performance, focusing on the precision--recall trade-off. Our findings reveal a pronounced conservative bias in zero-shot settings; while models exhibit high confidence, they disproportionately favor the 'normal' class, resulting in high precision but a recall collapse that limits practical utility. We demonstrate that class-specific instructions can significantly shift this decision boundary, improving the peak F1-score on ShanghaiTech from 0.09 to 0.64, yet recall remains a critical bottleneck. These results highlight a significant performance gap for MLLMs in noisy environments and provide a foundation for future work in recall-oriented prompting and model calibration for open-world surveillance, which demands complex video understanding and reasoning.

The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) has transformed prompt engineering from a localized craft into a systems-level governance challenge. As models scale and update across generations, prompt behavior becomes sensitive to shifts in instruction-following policies, alignment regimes, and decoding strategies, a phenomenon we characterize as GPT-scale model drift. Under such conditions, surface-level formatting conventions and ad hoc refinement are insufficient to ensure stable, interpretable control. This paper reconceptualizes Natural Language Declarative Prompting (NLD-P) as a declarative governance method rather than a rigid field template. NLD-P is formalized as a modular control abstraction that separates provenance, constraint logic, task content, and post-generation evaluation, encoded directly in natural language without reliance on external orchestration code. We define minimal compliance criteria, analyze model-dependent schema receptivity, and position NLD-P as an accessible governance framework for non-developer practitioners operating within evolving LLM ecosystems. Portions of drafting and editorial refinement employed a schema-bound LLM assistant configured under NLD-P. All conceptual framing, methodological claims, and final revisions were directed, reviewed, and approved by the human author under a documented human-in-the-loop protocol. The paper concludes by outlining implications for declarative control under ongoing model evolution and identifying directions for future empirical validation.

Large language models consistently fail the "car wash problem," a viral reasoning benchmark requiring implicit physical constraint inference. We present a variable isolation study (n=20 per condition, 6 conditions, 120 total trials) examining which prompt architecture layers in a production system enable correct reasoning. Using Claude 3.5 Sonnet with controlled hyperparameters (temperature 0.7, top_p 1.0), we find that the STAR (Situation-Task-Action-Result) reasoning framework alone raises accuracy from 0% to 85% (p=0.001, Fisher's exact test, odds ratio 13.22). Adding user profile context via vector database retrieval provides a further 10 percentage point gain, while RAG context contributes an additional 5 percentage points, achieving 100% accuracy in the full-stack condition. These results suggest that structured reasoning scaffolds -- specifically, forced goal articulation before inference -- matter substantially more than context injection for implicit constraint reasoning tasks.

Argument mining (AM) is an interdisciplinary research field focused on the automatic identification and classification of argumentative components, such as claims and premises, and the relationships between them. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved the performance of argument classification compared to traditional machine learning approaches. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of several state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-5.2, Llama 4, and DeepSeek, on large publicly available argument classification corpora such as Args.me and UKP. The evaluation incorporates advanced prompting strategies, including Chain-of- Thought prompting, prompt rephrasing, voting, and certainty-based classification. Both quantitative performance metrics and qualitative error analysis are conducted to assess model behavior. The best-performing model in the study (GPT-5.2) achieves a classification accuracy of 78.0% (UKP) and 91.9% (Args.me). The use of prompt rephrasing, multi-prompt voting, and certainty estimation further improves classification performance and robustness. These techniques increase the accuracy and F1 metric of the models by typically a few percentage points (from 2% to 8%). However, qualitative analysis reveals systematic failure modes shared across models, including instabilities with respect to prompt formulation, difficulties in detecting implicit criticism, interpreting complex argument structures, and aligning arguments with specific claims. This work contributes the first comprehensive evaluation that combines quantitative benchmarking and qualitative error analysis on multiple argument mining datasets using advanced LLM prompting strategies.

Prompting and steering techniques are well established in general-purpose generative AI, yet assistive visual question answering (VQA) tools for blind users still follow rigid interaction patterns with limited opportunities for customization. User control can be helpful when system responses are misaligned with their goals and contexts, a gap that becomes especially consequential for blind users that may rely on these systems for access. We invite 11 blind users to customize their interactions with a real-world conversational VQA system. Drawing on 418 interactions, reflections, and post-study interviews, we analyze prompting-based techniques participants adopted, including those introduced in the study and those developed independently in real-world settings. VQA interactions were often lengthy: participants averaged 3 turns, sometimes up to 21, with input text typically tenfold shorter than the responses they heard. Built on state-of-the-art LLMs, the system lacked verbosity controls, was limited in estimating distance in space and time, relied on inaccessible image framing, and offered little to no camera guidance. We discuss how customization techniques such as prompt engineering can help participants work around these limitations. Alongside a new publicly available dataset, we offer insights for interaction design at both query and system levels.

Smart contracts play a central role in blockchain systems by encoding financial and operational logic. Still, their susceptibility to subtle security flaws poses significant risks of financial loss and erosion of trust. LLMs create new opportunities for automating vulnerability detection, yet the effectiveness of different prompting strategies and model choices in real-world contexts remains uncertain. This paper evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on Solidity smart contract analysis using a balanced dataset of 400 contracts under two tasks: (i) Error Detection, where the model performs binary classification to decide whether a contract is vulnerable, and (ii) Error Classification, where the model must assign the predicted issue to a specific vulnerability category. Models are evaluated using zero-shot prompting strategies, including zero-shot, zero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and zero-shot Tree-of-Thought (ToT). In the Error Detection task, CoT and ToT substantially increase recall (often approaching ~ 95--99%), but typically reduce precision, indicating a more sensitive decision regime with more false positives. In the Error Classification task, Claude 3 Opus attains the best Weighted F1-score (90.8) under the ToT prompt, followed closely by its CoT.

Geospatial applications such as urban planning, epidemic forecasting, and transportation demand modeling depend on individual mobility data, but such data are costly to collect, uneven in coverage, and privacy-sensitive. Human mobility simulation offers a scalable alternative. A recent line of work treats large language models (LLMs) as human agents, modeling individual cognitive processes to generate realistic trajectories. Yet because each agent is simulated in isolation, these methods provide no population-level coordination mechanism, and the collective regularities of real mobility - how trip distances, visited locations, and flows distribute across a population - fail to emerge. We close this gap with COMPASS, which turns empirical mobility scaling laws into a feedback signal that guides prompt construction. COMPASS starts from coarse, population-level adjustments driven by these scaling laws and progressively refines them into individual prompts, jointly satisfying multiple aggregate objectives while keeping individual trajectories realistic. Across two public datasets, COMPASS outperforms state-of-the-art LLM-based simulators.

Large-scale verifiable prompts underpin the success of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), but they contain many uninformative examples and are costly to expand further. Recent studies focus on better exploiting limited training data by prioritizing hard prompts whose rollout pass rate is 0. However, easy prompts with a pass rate of 1 also become increasingly prevalent as training progresses, thereby reducing the effective data size. To mitigate this, we propose Composition-RL, an offline data-augmentation approach that composes existing prompts before RL to address the pass-rate-1 bottleneck without modifying the RL optimizer. The composed dataset is generated and verified once from the fixed source pool and then used for RL training. Extensive experiments across model sizes from 4B to 30B show that Composition-RL consistently improves reasoning capability over RL trained on the original dataset. Performance can be further boosted with a curriculum variant of Composition-RL that gradually increases compositional depth over training. Additionally, Composition-RL enables more effective cross-domain RL by composing prompts drawn from different domains. All our code, data, and models are publicly available to facilitate future research.

The real-world information sources are inherently multilingual, which naturally raises a question about whether language models can synthesize information across languages. In this paper, we introduce a simple two-hop question answering setting, where answering a question requires making inferences over two multilingual documents. We find that language models are more sensitive to language variation in answer-span documents than in those providing bridging information, despite the equal importance of both documents for answering a question. Under a step-by-step sub-question evaluation, we further show that in up to 33% of multilingual cases, models fail to infer the bridging information in the first step yet still answer the overall question correctly. This indicates that reasoning in language models, especially in multilingual settings, does not follow a faithful step-by-step decomposition. Subsequently, we show that the absence of reasoning decomposition leads to around 18% composition failure, where both sub-questions are answered correctly but fail for the final two-hop questions. To mitigate this, we propose a simple three-stage SUBQ prompting method to guide the multi-step reasoning with sub-questions, which boosts accuracy from 10.1% to 66.5%.