Robot Policy Learning
Overview
Robot policy learning studies how robots can turn camera, depth, tactile, and proprioceptive inputs into actions for tasks such as manipulation, locomotion, and navigation. Common approaches include behavior cloning from demonstrations, reinforcement learning in simulation or on hardware, and diffusion, flow-matching, or vision-language-action policies that generate action sequences; world models and hierarchical planners can add foresight and long-horizon structure. Researchers evaluate these methods in simulation suites such as LIBERO, CALVIN, RoboTwin, and navigation benchmarks, as well as on physical robots, with growing attention to memory, contact, safety, and recovery from failure. A central tension is how to make policies generalize across tasks, robots, and changing conditions while remaining data-efficient, reactive, reliable, and fast enough to deploy.
Latest papers
377 papers85 papers in the last four weeks, up 47% on the four weeks before. 0.5% of all new papers.
Beyond Predefined Learning Objects: A Thinking-Learning Interaction Model for Up-to-Date Autonomous Robot Learning
How to Instruct Your Robot: Dense Language Annotations Power Robot Policy Learning
SADP: Subgoal-Aware Diffusion Policy for Long-Horizon Manipulation Learned from Foundation Model Generated Demonstrations
Learning Sim-Grounded Policies for Bimanual Rope Manipulation from Human Teleoperation Data
NavRL++: A System-Level Framework for Improving Sim-to-Real Transfer in Reinforcement Learning-Based Robot Navigation
IntentVLA: Short-Horizon Intent Modeling for Aliased Robot Manipulation
Guide, Think, Act: Interactive Embodied Reasoning in Vision-Language-Action Models
AttenA+: Rectifying Action Inequality in Robotic Foundation Models
When Absolute State Fails: Evaluating Proprioceptive Encodings for Robust Manipulation
Guided Streaming Stochastic Interpolant Policy
StereoPolicy: Improving Robotic Manipulation Policies via Stereo Perception
Kintsugi: Learning Policies by Repairing Executable Knowledge Bases
BEACON: Cross-Domain Co-Training of Generative Robot Policies via Best-Effort Adaptation
Trajectory-Consistent Flow Matching for Robust Visuomotor Policy Learning
Drifting Field Policy: A One-Step Generative Policy via Wasserstein Gradient Flow
Good in Bad (GiB): Sifting Through End-user Demonstrations for Learning a Better Policy
Learning While Deploying: Fleet-Scale Reinforcement Learning for Generalist Robot Policies
Can Tabular Foundation Models Guide Exploration in Robot Policy Learning?
Reference-Augmented Learning for Precise Tracking Policy of Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots
Tube Diffusion Policy: Reactive Visual-Tactile Policy Learning for Contact-rich Manipulation
Hi-WM: Human-in-the-World-Model for Scalable Robot Post-Training
RPG: Robust Policy Gating for Smooth Multi-Skill Transitions in Humanoid Fighting
Mask World Model: Predicting What Matters for Robust Robot Policy Learning
Quadruped Parkour Learning: Sparsely Gated Mixture of Experts with Visual Input
StableIDM: Stabilizing Inverse Dynamics Model against Manipulator Truncation via Spatio-Temporal Refinement
AnchorRefine: Synergy-Manipulation Based on Trajectory Anchor and Residual Refinement for Vision-Language-Action Models
Think before Go: Hierarchical Reasoning for Image-goal Navigation
: a Steerable Generalist Robotic Foundation Model with Emergent Capabilities
A Mechanistic Analysis of Sim-and-Real Co-Training in Generative Robot Policies
structured representation alignment"**, reflects a balance between cross-domain representation alignment and domain discernibility, and plays a primary role in downstream performance. The second, the **importance reweighting effect", arises from domain-dependent modulation of action weighting and operates at a secondary level. We validate these effects with controlled experiments on a toy model and extensive sim-and-sim and sim-and-real robot manipulation experiments. Our analysis offers a unified interpretation of recent co-training techniques and motivates a simple method that consistently improves upon prior approaches. More broadly, our aim is to examine the inner workings of co-training and to facilitate research in this direction.