Near-Optimal Regret Guarantees

In online inverse linear optimization, the learner predicts a weight at each round, observes the optimal action of the agent, and updates its prediction. In the general setting, the gap of $\log T$ between the regret upper bound $O(d \log T)$ and the lower bound $Ω(d)$ is unresolved (here $T$ is the total number of rounds and $d$ is the dimension). When the action set is M-convex, the regret is known to be bounded by $O(d \log d)$, but the method attaining it computes a center of gravity at every round. This paper therefore proposes Small-Gradient Skipping (SGS), a mechanism that skips the update at rounds without a mistake in the case where the correct action is uniformly separated from the other candidates, and applies it to online gradient descent, the online Newton step, and MetaGrad. The number of mistakes is then bounded, for all three, by a quantity independent of $T$; and for the online Newton step and for MetaGrad with SGS, the dimension dependence of the regret becomes $O(d^2)$ when the forward problem is an integer linear program, that is, the factor $\log T$ is removed. Moreover, when the action set is M-convex, the regret is bounded efficiently without computing a center of gravity.

We introduce an uncoupled learning algorithm which, when employed by all players of an arbitrary $N$-player normal form game with up to $K$ actions per player, guarantees $O(N^3\log^2 K)$ individual regret, uniformly over the horizon of play. The proposed algorithm - which we call higher-order optimism with discounting (HOOD) is a variant of optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader (OptFTRL) that combines a discounted $(N+1)$-th order predictor with entropic regularization over a suitable "lifting" of the game's strategy space. This combination of ingredients is purposefully designed to dampen large oscillations of the induced sequence of play in a controlled manner, removing in this way a key stumbling block of previous attempts to achieve constant regret in general games. Our approach bears several striking similarities to the concurrent - and completely independent - work of Liu, Farina, and Ozdaglar (arXiv:2608.31166), who very recently derived an $O(N^{21}\log^{4} K)$ regret bound through the use of higher-order optimism and an exponential moving average estimator.

In high-dimensional online prediction, sparse comparators motivate regret bounds that depend on sparsity rather than ambient dimension. Feature priming seeks such adaptation by reweighting features using past data and refitting a minimum-norm predictor. At COLT 2023, Warmuth and Amid posed the open problem of whether the univariate, Pearson, or multivariate priming rules admit competitive online regret guarantees. Under the natural past-only Moore--Penrose protocol, we establish sparse-regret lower bounds that refute the corresponding sparse-logarithmic guarantee. The key obstruction is cheap nuisance interpolation, which permits exact interpolation of the history while assigning insufficient weight to the truly predictive coordinate. An exact target-mass identity and a two-sign argument convert this obstruction into clipped prediction loss. Hadamard constructions yield $Ω(\min\{T,\sqrt d\})$ clipped regret for each of the three unit-power rules against a zero-loss one-sparse comparator. For every fixed power $α\ge1$, one shared paired construction further yields linear regret simultaneously for all three powered rules and selectors among them in sufficiently high dimension. A rank upper bound is tight for powered univariate priming, even with Euclidean-unit inputs, and for unit-power Pearson priming with coordinatewise bounded inputs and target-preserving totalization. A separate algebraic construction gives $Ω(\min\{T,d^{1/4}\})$ regret for unit-power multivariate priming under Euclidean-unit inputs. The univariate lower bound persists under any nonnegative second-stage ridge schedule, while a paired ridge construction yields linear lower bounds for all three powered rules. Exploratory diagnostics on frozen language-model activations are consistent with the same qualitative mechanism. The exact multivariate frontier remains open.

Many online decision-making problems involve both round-specific feasible actions and drifting reward models: eligible ad impressions, feasible prices, and available treatments can change over time, while user preferences, demand curves, and patient responses may evolve. Motivated by these applications, we study non-stationary linear bandits with round-specific feasible decision sets. Existing methods that obtain the optimal $\widetilde O(T^{2/3}P_T^{1/3})$ dependence, where $P_T$ is the path length of the reward-parameter sequence, impose an orthogonal-structure assumption on round-specific decision sets, which can be restrictive in contextual applications. We address this gap through a unified misspecification-reduction viewpoint: after partitioning the horizon into blocks, we relate each block's dynamic regret to regret against a fixed-parameter linear bandit benchmark, with the within-block parameter drift entering as bounded misspecification. Restarting algorithms with misspecification-dependent regret guarantees then yields the optimal $T^{2/3}P_T^{1/3}$ dynamic-regret dependence for both linear bandits with general compact decision sets and $K$-armed contextual linear bandits.

Optimal Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms typically rely on carefully constructed count-based uncertainty estimates to drive exploration. Although theoretically sound, such estimates are hard to compute in practical settings and therefore offer limited insight for designing exploration heuristics. Meanwhile, ensembling has emerged as a practical approach, but remains without theoretical justification. Building on a recent ensemble-based method for Multi-Armed Bandits, we propose a quantile-based ensemble method for finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Our simple count-free approach achieves optimal variance-dependent regret bounds, providing theoretical grounding for ensemble-based exploration in RL.

We study stochastic linear bandits with delayed feedback under several delay models and establish near-optimal regret guarantees. Our results identify when delayed linear bandits exhibit the same qualitative behavior as multi-armed bandits (MAB), and when the linear structure creates fundamentally new challenges. Specifically, (1) for \emph{loss-independent delays}, where the delay does not depend on the realized loss (but potentially depends on the arm), we show that delays incur only an additive regret penalty. Under stochastic delays, this penalty scales with the expected delay, while under adversarial delays, it scales with the maximum number of outstanding observations. Notably, both delay penalties are dimension-free, improving upon the state-of-the-art results; (2) for \emph{loss-dependent delays}, we show that linear bandits are substantially harder than MAB: unlike in MAB, we prove matching (up to log factors) upper and lower bounds in linear bandits, whose delay penalty depends on the square root of the dimension. (3) for the \emph{delay-as-payoff model}, a special case of loss-dependent delay, we show that the optimal MAB guarantee, which depends only on the delay of the optimal arm, is also unattainable in linear bandits. Together, these results provide a sharp characterization of how delayed feedback interacts with linear generalization.

Modern recommendation systems increasingly rely on dynamically routing diverse queries to multiple embedding models. Despite its practical significance, this problem remains poorly understood under realistic conditions like adversarial queries, bandit feedback, and limited observability of models. We formalize embedding model routing as an adversarial contextual linear bandit with low-rank experts, where contexts are queries, actions are items, and experts are the embedding models working on low-rank latent representation spaces. We first establish that standard regret notions suffer from structural misspecification or statistical intractability, and we identify a log-quadratic policy class that is expressive enough to capture query-dependent model routing, yet structured enough to allow efficient online learning. Second, we propose a policy gradient algorithm called Hypentropy Policy Gradient (HPG). It provably adapts to the unknown low-rank structure under incomplete information and attains $\tilde{\mathcal O}(s\sqrt{M T})$ linearized policy regret -- where $s, M$, and $T$ are the intrinsic rank of the experts, the number of models, and the number of rounds -- thus avoiding a curse of dimensionality. Finally, we also provide an computationally efficient and parameter-free implementation of HPG.

We consider a variant of the linear contextual stochastic multi-armed bandits, where the learner must provide recommendations to a group of users, each having its personalized preference vector, and in the presence of context distributions that are drifting over time. Under practitioner-friendly assumptions, we reduce this setting to linear bandit with stationary mean but heteroskedastic and non-stationary noise. We further study the case when the learner must ensure the mean reward of each decision must exceed that of a baseline strategy $\boldsymbolπ_0$ at each decision step. We introduce Dri-MED, an algorithm inspired from the linear version of the MED strategy, and carefully adapted to handle the non-stationary heteroskedastic noise. We show that the instance-dependent regret scales as $\tilde{\mathcal O}\left(\fracκ{\tildeΔ}d^2(\log(T)\right)$, where $\tildeΔ$ is the constraint-aware sub-optimality gap subject to policy $π_0$, with variance-aware multiplicative term $κ$ that we carefully handle using heteroskedastic regression. We further show Dri-MED enjoys $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d)$ expected constraint violations. Our numerical results suggest that Dri-MED significantly outperforms conservative baselines that ignores the drift and preference structure.

While algorithmic stability is a central tool for understanding generalization of learning algorithms, existing high-probability guarantees typically rely on uniform boundedness or sub-Gaussian/sub-Weibull tail assumptions, which can be overly restrictive for modern settings with heavy-tailed or unbounded losses. We develop a stability-based framework that requires only a finite $L_p$ moment condition. Our first contribution is sharp concentration inequalities for functions of independent random variables under $L_p$ constraints, extending McDiarmid's bounded-differences techniques beyond the classical regime. Leveraging these results, we derive sharp high-probability generalization bounds across a range of learning paradigms, including empirical risk minimization, transductive regression, and meta-learning. These guarantees show that $L_p$ stability suffices for robust generalization even when boundedness fails, substantially weakening the standard assumptions in the stability literature.

Network routers that enforce Quality-of-Service (QoS) guarantees must decide, at every clock cycle, which expiring packet of information to transmit, even when the value of the packet is unknown until it is processed. We frame this problem as the Online Packet Scheduling with Deadlines (OPSD) problem under Partial Feedback: packets arrive at every clock cycle, with different deadlines, but the weights are only observed after execution. Under a stochastic assumption on the unknown weights, we explore different variants of the OPSD problem with bandit feedback. We establish a connection between our setting and the sleeping bandits problem, and set our learning goal to $α$-regret minimization. We provide algorithms with provable $α$-regret guarantees under different spans of slackness, distinguishing systems allowing for randomization and systems that do not. In every scenario, our algorithms achieve an $α$-regret upper bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(\sqrt{KT}\right)$, matching the lower bound for the standard bandit setting. In the practically relevant case of $2$-bounded deadline instances, where the deadline is set at most one clock cycle away from the arrival, our deterministic algorithm achieves the provably tightest possible competitive ratio. Remarkably, when the number of distinct packet types $K\ge 2$ is finite, it is possible to break the well-established $Φ= \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ competitive ratio barrier and attain a tighter competitive ratio $θ_K$ ranging in $[\sqrt{2}, Φ)$.

We prove a variance-sensitive regret bound for Thompson sampling in stochastic generalised linear bandits. The argument assumes a warm-up, after which the regret is controlled through using the Gaussian Poincaré inequality. This bypasses the point at which previous optimism-based analyses break down. Removing the warm-up while retaining the same variance-sensitive scaling remains open, and appears nontrivial.

We present an online, distribution-free framework for controlling the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), extending conformal tail risk control to non-stationary and adversarial environments. Unlike classical risk control methods, which rely on stationarity or linearity of expectation, our approach provides provable safety guarantees for a nonlinear tail risk functional under arbitrary data-generating processes that may drift or shift strategically over time. By leveraging deep connections between conformal tail risk control, online learning, and the variational representation of CVaR introduced by Rockafellar and Uryasev, we develop a novel procedure for online CVaR control with adversarial regret guarantees. The proposed method operates without assumptions on the underlying data-generating process, making it broadly applicable in modern high-stakes deployment settings. We prove that the realized empirical CVaR is asymptotically controlled at the target level, and that the resulting control is asymptotically tight up to a finite-sample conservatism gap. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on portfolio risk management and toxicity mitigation for Large Language Models (LLMs), where rare but catastrophic failures dominate system risk.

Reinforcement learning with multinomial logistic (MNL) function approximation has become an important framework due to its flexibility and broad applicability. While existing studies have established regret guarantees under worst-case analysis, they do not capture how performance depends on the variability of the interaction between the learner and the environment. In this paper, we develop a new theoretical analysis for MNL-based Markov decision processes that yields explicit variance-adaptive regret bounds. Our algorithm is computationally efficient and achieves the instance-wise optimal rate of regret, narrowing the gap between upper and lower bounds. Our numerical experiments validate that our method learns optimal policies more efficiently than conventional approaches.

We study bandit learning in matching markets, where players and arms constitute the two market sides, and the players' utilities are linear in the arm contexts. In each round, new arms arrive with observable contexts. Then, the algorithm matches them to players, aiming to minimize each player's regret against a stable matching benchmark. This contextual structure creates significant complexity: subtle context shifts can slightly alter one player's utility while completely reconfiguring the underlying benchmark, causing large regret spikes for others. We address this in two settings: stochastic contexts, drawn from a latent distribution, and adversarial contexts, which may be arbitrary. For the stochastic case, we introduce a novel minimum preference gap to capture learning difficulty and provide a fully adaptive algorithm with an instance-dependent poly-logarithmic regret upper bound. We also establish matching instance-independent regret upper and lower bounds under a mild distributional assumption. For the adversarial setting, we propose a tractable regret notion that remains valid under arbitrary contexts and achieves an instance-independent sublinear regret bound via an adaptive algorithm.

We study decentralized online convex optimization when agents communicate over a graph and messages may be compressed. Classical decentralized online methods typically require learning-rate choices that depend on the horizon, comparator scale, or other problem parameters, while compressed communication introduces additional disagreement that must be controlled. We propose DECO-EF (DEcentralized COin-betting with Error Feedback), a decentralized parameter-free online learning algorithm that combines coin-betting predictions with compressed difference-based gossip. Each agent maintains a clean accumulated state and a compressed tracker, and communicates only compressed state differences during gossip steps. The method is parameter-free in the online-learning sense: it does not tune to the horizon, the comparator norm, or the learning rate. We prove expected comparator-adaptive network-regret bounds for DECO-EF under compressed communication. To the best of our knowledge, this gives the first expected sublinear network-regret guarantees for parameter-free decentralized online learning under compressed communication.

We study reinforcement learning for episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) whose transitions are modelled by a multinomial logistic (MNL) model. Existing algorithms for MNL mixture MDPs yield a regret of $\smash{\tilde{O}(dH^2\sqrt{T})}$ (Li et al., 2024), where $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ the episode length, and $T$ the number of episodes. Inspired by the logistic bandit literature (Abeille et al., 2021; Faury et al., 2022; Boudart et al., 2026), we introduce a problem-dependent constant $\barσ\_T \leq 1/2$, measuring the normalised average variance of the optimal downstream value function along the learner's trajectory. We propose an algorithm achieving a regret of $\smash{\tilde{O}(dH^2\barσ\_T\sqrt{T})}$, which recovers the existing bound in the worst case and improves upon it for structured MDPs. For instance, for KL-constrained robust MDPs, $\barσ\_T = O(H^{-1})$, reducing the horizon dependence by a factor $H$. We further establish a matching $\smash{Ω(dH^2\barσ\_T\sqrt{T})}$ lower bound, proving minimax optimality (up to logarithmic factors) and fully characterising the regret complexity of MNL mixture MDPs for the first time.

The transition to First-Price Auctions (FPA) in digital advertising has spurred significant research, yet existing work typically assumes access to a valuation oracle, ignoring the reality that values must be inferred from censored data. While Linear Treatment Effect (LTE) models address this by learning value uplift, they have not been adapted to realistic settings with hard Budget constraints or Return-on-Spend (RoS) targets requiring regret and violation control. In this work, we propose a unified primal-dual framework for constrained FPAs that jointly learns the latent LTE valuation parameters and the competitor's bid distribution. This simultaneous learning introduces a critical technical challenge: the estimation error is dynamically scaled by the Lagrangian multiplier, potentially leading to unbounded regret. We resolve this by leveraging a strong Slater condition and a novel adaptive burn-in procedure to stabilize the dual variables. Our approach achieves near-optimal regret guarantees, providing the first theoretically grounded solution for constrained bidding with latent valuations.

We consider online learning problems under a partial observability model capturing situations where the information conveyed to the learner is between full information and bandit feedback. In the simplest variant, we assume that in addition to its own loss, the learner also gets to observe losses of some other actions. The revealed losses depend on the learner's action and a directed observation system chosen by the environment. For this setting, we propose the first algorithm that enjoys near-optimal regret guarantees without having to know the observation system before selecting its actions. Along similar lines, we also define a new partial information setting that models online combinatorial optimization problems where the feedback received by the learner is between semi-bandit and full feedback. As the predictions of our first algorithm cannot be always computed efficiently in this setting, we propose another algorithm with similar properties and with the benefit of always being computationally efficient, at the price of a slightly more complicated tuning mechanism. Both algorithms rely on a novel exploration strategy called implicit exploration, which is shown to be more efficient both computationally and information-theoretically than previously studied exploration strategies for the problem.

Many bandit systems are deployed with offline historical data, such as past logs from earlier policies. Using these data can reduce early online exploration when they remain informative for the online problem. When the offline and online environments differ, such data can be biased for the online problem. For linear (contextual) bandits, this bias is directional: offline data may be informative in some feature directions and misleading in others. However, prior work typically controls this gap through a known Euclidean bound on the model parameters, which we prove is too coarse: even with the offline parameter known, bias in a single unknown direction can force dimension-dependent regret. To address this challenge, we introduce a directional bias certificate $(M_{\mathrm{bias}},ρ)$ that measures the offline-to-online gap through an $M_{\mathrm{bias}}$-induced norm and assigns different bias budgets to different directions. Building on this certificate, we propose \emph{Ellipsoidal-MINUCB}, which augments the online learning with an offline-pooled branch that safely exploits historical data. When the certificate is known, we show that the algorithm matches the standard SupLinUCB rate in the worst case and improves when offline coverage aligns with low-bias directions. When the certificate is unknown, we estimate it adaptively from offline and accumulated online data and establish a corresponding regret guarantee. Numerical experiments support the theory and show gains in aligned regimes.

This work studies online episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with known transitions and develops best-of-both-worlds algorithms that achieve refined data-dependent regret bounds in the adversarial regime and variance-dependent regret bounds in the stochastic regime. We quantify MDP complexity using a first-order quantity and several new data-dependent measures for the adversarial regime, including a second-order quantity and a path-length measure, as well as variance-based measures for the stochastic regime. To adapt to these measures, we develop algorithms based on global optimization and policy optimization, both built on optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader with log-barrier regularization. For global optimization, our algorithms achieve first-order, second-order, and path-length regret bounds in the adversarial regime, and in the stochastic regime, they achieve a variance-aware gap-independent bound and a variance-aware gap-dependent bound that is polylogarithmic in the number of episodes. For policy optimization, our algorithms achieve the same data- and variance-dependent adaptivity, up to a factor of the episode horizon, by exploiting a new optimistic $Q$-function estimator. Finally, we establish regret lower bounds in terms of data-dependent complexity measures for the adversarial regime and a variance measure for the stochastic regime, implying that the regret upper bounds achieved by the global-optimization approach are nearly optimal.

Thompson sampling (TS) is one of the most popular and earliest algorithms to solve stochastic multi-armed bandit problems. We consider a variant of TS, named $α$-TS, where we use a fractional or $α$-posterior ($α\in(0,1)$) instead of the standard posterior distribution. To compute an $α$-posterior, the likelihood in the definition of the standard posterior is tempered with a factor $α$. For $α$-TS we obtain both instance-dependent $\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{k \neq i^*} Δ_k\left(\frac{\log(T)}{C(α)Δ_k^2} + \frac{1}{2} \right)\right)$ and instance-independent $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{KT\log K})$ frequentist regret bounds under very mild conditions on the prior and reward distributions, where $Δ_k$ is the gap between the true mean rewards of the $k^{th}$ and the best arms, and $C(α)$ is a known constant. Both the sub-Gaussian and exponential family models satisfy our general conditions on the reward distribution. Our conditions on the prior distribution can be easily satisfied by a density that is positive, continuous, and bounded. We also establish another instance-dependent regret upper bound that matches (up to constants) to that of improved UCB [Auer and Ortner, 2010]. Our regret analysis carefully adapts and combines recent theoretical developments in the non-asymptotic concentration analysis and Bernstein-von Mises type results for the $α$-posterior distribution. Moreover, our analysis does not require additional structural properties such as closed-form posteriors or conjugate priors.

Most learning algorithms with formal regret guarantees essentially rely on trying all possible behaviors, which is problematic when some errors cannot be recovered from. Instead, we allow the learning agent to ask for help from a mentor and to transfer knowledge between similar states. We show that this combination enables the agent to learn both safely and effectively. Under standard online learning assumptions, we provide an algorithm whose regret and number of mentor queries are both sublinear in the time horizon for Markov decision processes with irreversible dynamics and infinite state spaces. Our proof involves a sequence of three reductions, making our result more general than a single algorithm. Conceptually, our result may be the first formal proof that it is possible for an agent to obtain high reward while becoming self-sufficient in an unknown, unbounded, and high-stakes environment without resets.