Search research

Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are central to quantum machine learning, while recent progress in Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KANs) highlights the power of learnable activation functions. We unify these directions by introducing the quantum variational activation function (QVAF), a general framework in which parameterized quantum circuits serve as learnable activation functions; in this work we study an efficient single-qubit instantiation called DatA Re-Uploading ActivatioN (DARUAN). We show that DARUAN with trainable data-preprocessing weights can realize an exponentially growing accessible frequency support with the number of re-uploading repetitions; for an explicit geometric choice of these weights, this gives a capacity-level exponential parameter reduction relative to independently parameterized Fourier activations. Embedding DARUAN into KAN yields the quantum-inspired Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (QKAN), which retains the interpretability of the KAN architecture while improving parameter efficiency, expressivity, and generalization. We further introduce layer extension and the hybrid QKAN (HQKAN) architecture to improve scalability and computational efficiency, enabling QKAN modules to act as compact replacements for multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) in large-scale models. We provide theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on function regression, image classification, and autoregressive generative language modeling, demonstrating the efficiency and scalability of QKANs. Because the single-qubit circuits are efficiently simulable on classical quantum simulators, QKANs have quantum-inspired advantage in parameter efficiency and training stability; DARUANs and QKANs serve as present-day validation of the QVAF concept, and the trained DARUANs are directly executable and feasible on current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware for inference validation.

Effective analysis in neuroscience benefits significantly from robust conceptual frameworks. Traditional metrics of interbrain synchrony in social neuroscience typically depend on fixed, correlation-based approaches, restricting their explanatory capacity to descriptive observations. Inspired by the successful integration of geometric insights in network science, we propose leveraging discrete geometry to examine the dynamic reconfigurations in neural interactions during social exchanges. Unlike conventional synchrony approaches, our method interprets inter-brain connectivity changes through the evolving geometric structures of neural networks. This geometric framework is realized through a pipeline that identifies critical transitions in network connectivity using entropy metrics derived from curvature distributions. By doing so, we significantly enhance the capacity of hyperscanning methodologies to uncover underlying neural mechanisms in interactive social behavior.

Sparse dictionary coding represents signals as linear combinations of a few dictionary atoms. It has been applied to images, time series, graph signals and multi-way spatio-temporal data by jointly employing temporal and spatial dictionaries. Data-agnostic analytical dictionaries, such as the discrete Fourier transform, wavelets and graph Fourier, have seen wide adoption due to efficient implementations and good practical performance. On the other hand, dictionaries learned from data offer sparser and more accurate solutions but require learning of both the dictionaries and the coding coefficients. This becomes especially challenging for multi-dictionary scenarios since encoding coefficients correspond to all atom combinations from the dictionaries. To address this challenge, we propose a low-rank coding model for 2-dictionary scenarios and study its data complexity. Namely, we establish upper and lower bounds on the number of samples needed to learn dictionaries that generalize to unseen samples from the same distribution. We propose an alternating convex optimization solution, called AODL, which employs alternating optimization between the sparse coding matrices and the learned dictionaries. We demonstrate its quality for data reconstruction and missing value imputation in both synthetic and real-world datasets. For a fixed reconstruction quality, AODL learns up to $90\%$ sparser solutions compared to non-low-rank and analytical (fixed) dictionary baselines. In addition, the learned dictionaries reveal interpretable insights into patterns from training samples.

Synthetic tabular data generation is increasingly essential in machine learning, supporting downstream applications when real-world, high-quality tabular data is insufficient. Existing tabular generation approaches, such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) and fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs), typically require sufficient reference data, limiting their effectiveness in domain-specific datasets with scarce records. While prompt-based LLMs offer flexibility without parameter tuning, they often generate distributionally drifted data with localized redundancy, leading to degradation in downstream task performance. To overcome these issues, we propose ReFine, a framework that (i) extracts symbolic if-then rules from interpretable models and embeds them into prompts to explicitly guide the generation process toward the domain-specific distribution, and (ii) applies dual-granularity filtering that mitigates over-sampling patterns while preserving rare but informative samples to reduce localized redundancy. Extensive experiments on diverse benchmarks demonstrate that ReFine provides robust downstream utility, achieving a top-tier average rank across datasets and data regimes, with an average relative improvement of 7.48% in extreme low-data regimes.

Generalized extreme value models capture dependence among choice alternatives in discrete choice modeling, but require this dependence to be predefined, symmetric, and shared uniformly across individuals. Recent efforts to synergize discrete choice models with deep neural networks have improved predictive performance but still cannot explicitly represent alternative dependence within neural architectures. To address these gaps, we introduce the alternative graph -- a graph in which nodes represent choice alternatives and edges encode their dependence -- and propose Alternative Graph Neural Networks (Alt-GNNs), a family of GNN-based discrete choice models that embed alternative dependence within a unified framework. Theoretically, Alt-GNNs incorporate multinomial logit, nested logit, and ASU-DNN as special cases and enable innovative model designs, including Nested Alt-GNN, Complete Alt-GNN, and Attention Alt-GNN. Alt-GNNs are consistent with random utility maximization theory, enforce behavioral constraints through alternative graphs, and offer a novel graph-based interpretation of utility functions. Empirically, on two travel mode choice datasets from London and Chicago, Alt-GNNs significantly improve predictive performance over all benchmark models in mode choice modeling because of their flexible alternative graph design and vast hyperparameter space. Even the simplest Alt-GNN variant -- Nested Alt-GNN -- generalizes the nested logit model while preserving its unique two-layer substitution properties, enabling graph-based behavioral constraints over otherwise unconstrained behavioral patterns from deep neural networks.

Swarm-based optimization algorithms have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex problems, yet their widespread adoption remains limited due to poor transparency in how algorithmic components influence performance. This work presents a multi-faceted explainability framework for Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) through two complementary perspectives: landscape-based and algorithmic explainability. From the landscape-based perspective, we develop a comprehensive characterization framework using Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) to quantify problem difficulty, multimodality, and ruggedness, extracting ELA meta-features, dispersion measures, and information content statistics, while a machine learning approach employing Decision Tree and Random Forest classifiers enables prediction of optimal topology-specific hyperparameter configurations for unseen problems. From the algorithmic explainability perspective, we integrate IOHxplainer for temporal convergence profiling and Search Trajectory Networks (STN) for spatial navigation mapping, proposing three novel STN metrics-Connectivity Density, Fragmentation Score, and Search Efficiency-that enhance visual explainability by quantifying topology-specific search organization and transition effectiveness. Through systematic experimentation across 24 benchmark functions in multiple dimensions with Star, Ring, and Von Neumann topologies, we establish practical guidelines for topology selection and parameter configuration. Our findings uncover the black-box nature of PSO, providing greater transparency and interpretability to swarm intelligence systems. The source code is available at https://github.com/GitNitin02/ioh_pso.

We introduce Robust Filter Attention (RFA), a formulation of self-attention as a robust state estimator. Each token is treated as a noisy observation of a latent trajectory governed by a linear stochastic differential equation (SDE), and attention weights are determined by consistency under this model rather than static feature similarity. Under isotropic noise and decay assumptions, RFA matches the computational complexity of standard attention. On language modeling benchmarks, RFA achieves lower perplexity than RoPE within the training window while remaining stable under zero-shot extrapolation to longer contexts. The framework also provides a dynamical interpretation of standard positional mechanisms, connecting rotational embeddings and recency biases to transport and uncertainty propagation induced by stochastic dynamics.

Traditional decision tree models, which rely exclusively on numerical variables, often face challenges in handling high-dimensional data and are limited in their ability to incorporate textual information effectively. To address these limitations, we propose the integrated multivariate segmentation tree (IMST), a comprehensive framework designed to improve credit evaluation for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by integrating financial data with textual sources. This method comprises three core stages: (1) transforming textual data into numerical matrices through matrix factorization, (2) selecting salient financial features using Lasso regression, and (3) constructing a multivariate segmentation tree based on either the Gini index or entropy, with weakest-link pruning applied to control model complexity. Experimental results based on a dataset of 1,428 Chinese SMEs demonstrated that IMST achieved an accuracy rate of 88.9%, surpassing both baseline decision trees (87.4%) and conventional models such as support vector machines and neural networks. Furthermore, the proposed model demonstrated superior interpretability and computational efficiency, featuring a more streamlined architecture and improved risk detection capabilities.

Safety alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) often involves mediating internal representations to refuse harmful requests. Recent research has demonstrated that these safety mechanisms can be bypassed by ablating or removing specific representational directions within the model. In this paper, we propose the opposite approach: Rank-One Safety Injection (ROSI), a white-box method that amplifies a model's safety alignment by permanently steering its activations toward the refusal-mediating subspace. ROSI operates as a simple, fine-tuning-free rank-one weight modification applied to all residual stream write matrices. The required safety direction can be computed from a small set of harmful and harmless instruction pairs. We show that ROSI consistently increases safety refusal rates - as evaluated by Llama Guard 3 - while preserving the utility of the model on standard benchmarks such as MMLU, HellaSwag, and Arc. Furthermore, we show that ROSI can also re-align 'uncensored' models by amplifying their own latent safety directions, demonstrating its utility as an effective last-mile safety procedure. Our results suggest that targeted, interpretable weight steering is a cheap and potent mechanism to improve LLM safety, complementing more resource-intensive fine-tuning paradigms.

Qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses is a commonly used research method in science education. However, traditional coding approaches are often time-consuming and prone to inconsistency, especially when applied to large datasets. Existing solutions from Natural Language Processing such as supervised classifiers, topic modeling techniques, and generative large language models have limited applicability in analysis of open-ended survey responses, since they demand extensive labeled data, disrupt established qualitative workflows, and/or yield variable results. In this paper, we introduce a text embedding-based classification framework called Deductive Semantic Content Analysis (DeSCA) that requires only a handful of examples per category to run, is transparent and replicable, and fits well with standard qualitative workflows. When benchmarked against human analysis of a physics education survey consisting of 2899 open-ended responses, the method described by our framework achieves high agreement with expert human coders across ten embeddings models on a simulated exhaustive coding task, using approximately 1-2% of the total dataset for training. The method achieves lower agreement on a complete selective coding task; this performance, however, improves with fine-tuning of the text embedding model, which can be done with a small amount of additional data. We unpack these results in terms of the theoretical assumptions of text embeddings, and further demonstrate how embeddings can be used to audit previously-analyzed datasets for coding consistency. These findings demonstrate that text embedding-assisted coding can flexibly scale to thousands of responses without sacrificing interpretability, opening avenues for deductive qualitative analysis at scale.

X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) provides non-destructive three-dimensional (3D) imaging of porous material microstructures. In situ experiments, including mechanical loading and reactive transport, increasingly require dynamic four-dimensional (4D) imaging with volumes repeatedly acquired during experiments. However, rapid acquisition typically requires fewer projections, shorter exposures, or reduced fields of view, producing reconstructions with noise, blur, and artifacts that obscure pores, microcracks, and interfaces. To address this challenge, this study introduces InSituRes, a physics-informed same-grid volumetric enhancement framework for fast dynamic X-ray micro-CT imaging of temporally evolving materials. InSituRes maps fast-acquisition volumes to higher-quality long-acquisition reconstructions using paired scans of the same specimens. The model integrates 3D convolutional feature extraction with slice-wise transformer attention to capture local and broader in-plane context. A learnable forward degradation model approximates rapid acquisition effects, including spatial blurring, intensity scaling differences, and signal-dependent noise. During training, reconstructed volumes should match high-quality reference scans and reproduce observed fast acquisition data after propagation through the forward model, imposing a physics-guided consistency constraint. Experiments on unseen micro-CT datasets demonstrate improved reconstruction fidelity and enhanced visibility of fine microstructural features relative to conventional interpolation and learning-based enhancement approaches. The framework supports quantitative interpretation of fast 4D X-ray micro-CT scans of evolving materials.

Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI, aiming to endow machines with the human-like ability to decompose visual scenes, ground intermediate concepts, and perform multi-step logical inference. While early surveys focus on monolithic vision-language models or general multimodal reasoning, a dedicated synthesis of the rapidly expanding compositional visual reasoning literature is still missing. We fill this gap with a comprehensive survey spanning 2023 to 2025 that systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.). We first formalize core definitions and describe why compositional approaches offer advantages in cognitive alignment, semantic fidelity, robustness, interpretability, and data efficiency. Next, we trace a five-stage paradigm shift: from prompt-enhanced language-centric pipelines, through tool-enhanced LLMs and tool-enhanced VLMs, to recently minted chain-of-thought reasoning and unified agentic VLMs, highlighting their architectural designs, strengths, and limitations. We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception. Drawing on these analyses, we distill key insights, identify open challenges (e.g., limitations of LLM-based reasoning, hallucination, a bias toward deductive reasoning, scalable supervision, tool integration, and benchmark limitations), and outline future directions, including world-model integration, human-AI collaborative reasoning, and richer evaluation protocols. By offering a unified taxonomy, historical roadmap, and critical outlook, this survey aims to serve as a foundational reference and inspire the next generation of compositional visual reasoning research.

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) extract features from LLM internal activations, meant to correspond to interpretable concepts. A core SAE training hyperparameter is L0: how many SAE features should fire per token on average. Existing work compares SAE algorithms using sparsity-reconstruction tradeoff plots, implying L0 is a free parameter with no inherently correct value aside from its effect on reconstruction. In this work we study the effect of L0 on SAEs, and show that if L0 is not set correctly, the SAE fails to disentangle the underlying features of the LLM. If L0 is too low, the SAE will mix correlated features to improve reconstruction. If L0 is too high, the SAE finds degenerate solutions that also mix features. Further, we present a proxy metric that can help guide the search for the correct L0 for an SAE on a given training distribution. We show that our method finds the correct L0 in toy models and coincides with peak sparse probing performance in LLM SAEs. We find that most commonly used SAEs have an L0 that is too low. Our work shows that practitioners must set L0 correctly to train SAEs with monosemantic features.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in politically sensitive contexts, raising concerns about their susceptibility to ideological biases. In this work, we examine how synthetic persona conditioning shapes ideological expression across seven open-weight instruction-tuned models (7B-72B parameters) using the Political Compass Test (62 statements) as a standardized behavioral probe. Across three studies involving 200,000 synthetic personas and more than 260 million model responses, we analyze implicit and explicit malleability, as well as theme-associated variations. We find that: (i) larger models exhibit broader implicit ideological coverage, increasing from 14-35% for 7-8B models to up to 49% for 70B+ models; (ii) explicit ideological priming induces large and statistically significant shifts, with right-authoritarian cues moving all models in the intended direction and producing larger effects in most model-axis comparisons; (iii) left-libertarian priming produces more heterogeneous responses, including counter-directional economic shifts in three of four 7-8B models, while all 70B+ models move in the intended direction; and (iv) theme-associated semantic content in persona descriptions is linked to systematic and interpretable directional shifts in ideological space. While our results identify an upstream mechanism through which persona conditioning can alter model responses under a standardized ideological probe, we do not test whether such shifts affect users beliefs, decisions, or political behavior. Our findings are best understood as evidence of ideological malleability at the generation layer, highlighting the need to account for interactional factors when evaluating political neutrality, fairness, and safety in English-prompted, persona-conditioned language models.

Knowledge graphs (KGs) can be enhanced through rule mining; however, the resulting logical rules are often difficult for humans to interpret due to their inherent complexity and the idiosyncratic labeling conventions of individual KGs. This work presents Rule2Text, a comprehensive framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate natural language explanations for mined logical rules, thereby improving KG accessibility and usability. We conduct extensive experiments using multiple datasets, including Freebase variants (FB-CVT-REV, FB+CVT-REV, and FB15k-237) as well as the ogbl-biokg dataset, with rules mined using AMIE 3.5.1. We systematically evaluate several LLMs across a comprehensive range of prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, variable type incorporation, and Chain-of-Thought reasoning. To systematically assess models' performance, we conduct a human evaluation of generated explanations on correctness and clarity. To address evaluation scalability, we develop and validate an LLM-as-a-judge framework that demonstrates strong agreement with human evaluators. Leveraging the best-performing model (Gemini 2.0 Flash), LLM judge, and human-in-the-loop feedback, we construct high-quality ground truth datasets, which we use to fine-tune the open-source Zephyr model. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in explanation quality after fine-tuning, with particularly strong gains in the domain-specific dataset. Additionally, we integrate a type inference module to support KGs lacking explicit type information. All code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/idirlab/KGRule2NL.

Understanding biases and stereotypes encoded in the weights of Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies. However, biased behavior is often subtle and non-trivial to isolate, even when deliberately elicited, making systematic analysis and debiasing particularly challenging. To address this, we introduce a simple, cost-effective, and generalizable framework \texttt{BiasGym} for reliably injecting, analyzing, and mitigating conceptual associations of biases within LLMs. \texttt{BiasGym} consists of two modules: \texttt{Inject}, which injects specific biases into the model via token-based fine-tuning while keeping the model frozen, followed by two debiasing methods that leverage these injected signals to identify and reliably suppress (\texttt{Scope}) or \texttt{Steer} the components responsible for biased behavior. Our framework enables consistent bias elicitation for better localization of bias conceptual association in the model space, supports targeted debiasing without degrading performance on downstream tasks, and generalizes to biases unseen during fine-tuning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework in reducing real-world stereotypes (e.g., people from Italy being `reckless drivers'), showing its utility for both safety interventions and interpretability research.

Endoscopic diagnosis is an iterative process in which clinicians acquire, compare, and verify local visual evidence before reaching a conclusion. Current AI systems do not adequately support this process because fine-grained evidence acquisition and multi-step reasoning remain weakly coupled, complicating reconciliation of image-derived findings with their textual interpretations. This gives rise to two failure modes, hallucinated evidence and uncorrected error accumulation, that undermine diagnostic reliability. We propose EndoCogniAgent, a closed-loop agentic framework that formulates endoscopic diagnosis as a controlled state update process for integrating complementary visual and textual evidence. At each reasoning round, a central planner selects an evidence acquisition action, specialized expert tools extract spatial and semantic observations as structured textual evidence, and a self-consistency validation mechanism examines this evidence along two dimensions, knowledge consistency against the input image and temporal consistency with prior validated findings, before updating the diagnostic state. Validated observations are admitted into the evolving state to condition subsequent planning, while insufficiently supported or conflicting findings are retained with corrective feedback that redirects the planner toward additional verification. We further introduce EndoAgentBench, a workflow-oriented benchmark comprising 6,132 question-answer pairs from 11 endoscopic datasets, to evaluate diagnostic agents across a comprehensive diagnostic chain, from fine-grained visual perception to high-level diagnostic reasoning. EndoCogniAgent achieves 85.23% overall accuracy on perception tasks and 71.13% clinical acceptance rate on reasoning tasks. Blinded clinician evaluation further shows consistent improvements in diagnostic response quality over the evaluated baselines.

Reliable evaluation of machine learning models for neonatal seizure detection is critical for clinical adoption. Current practices often rely on inconsistent and biased metrics, hindering model comparability and interpretability. Expert-level claims about AI performance are frequently made without rigorous validation, raising concerns about their reliability. This study aims to systematically evaluate common performance metrics and propose best practices tailored to the specific challenges of neonatal seizure detection. Using real and synthetic seizure annotations, we assessed standard performance metrics, consensus strategies, and human-expert level equivalence tests under varying class imbalance, inter-rater agreement, and number of raters. Matthews and Pearson's correlation coefficients outperformed the area under the curve in reflecting performance under class imbalance. Consensus types are sensitive to the number of raters and agreement level among them. Among human-expert level equivalence tests, the multi-rater Turing test using Fleiss k best captured expert-level AI performance. We recommend reporting: (1) at least one balanced metric, (2) Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, (3) Multi-rater Turing test results using Fleiss k, and (4) All the above on held-out validation set. This proposed framework provides an important prerequisite to clinical validation by enabling a thorough and honest appraisal of AI methods for neonatal seizure detection.

The advent of large language models (LLMs) has sparked an evolution of autonomous web browsing agents: given a web browsing task and serialised user interface (UI) state, an LLM is expected to suggest input actions that incrementally solve the given task. The central challenge lies in serialising UI state for LLMs. Web agents have increasingly relied on grounded graphical UI (GUI) snapshots - screenshots augmented with visual cues - favoured for their modest input token footprint. Document object model (DOM) snapshots, serialised as HTML, represent a compelling alternative that leverages previously demonstrated HTML interpretation capabilities of LLMs. Their excessive token footprint, however, has precluded reliable deployment with web agents to date. We propose D2Snap, an algorithm to downsample the DOM, premised on preserving actionability and actionability-discriminating features. We evaluate D2Snap-downsampled DOM snapshots using a snapshot-variant web agent (GPT-4o) on a dataset sampled from Online-Mind2Web. Whilst 42% of raw DOM snapshots exceed the model context window (128 x 10^3 tokens), all D2Snap-downsampled DOM snapshots of our reference configuration fit, at a mean context utilisation of 16.5%. Against the 67% success rate of a grounded GUI snapshot baseline, our configuration attains 73% (+5.8%pt; 95% CI -13.6 to +26.0%pt; McNemar, p = 0.47), excluding a deficit (one-sided 95%) beyond 11%pt. Image input moreover appears to add little to snapshot utility; grounding text alone attains 62% (-5.8%pt; McNemar, p = 0.37).

Objective: Sparse Bayesian learning provides an effective framework to solve high-dimensional problems in brain signal decoding. However, conventional likelihoods regarding data distributions, such as Gaussian or Bernoulli, are potentially inadequate for handling the noisy recordings of brain activity. Hence, this work aims to formulate a robust sparse Bayesian learning framework to address noisy high-dimensional brain activity decoding. Methods: Motivated by the commendable robustness of the minimum error entropy learning criterion for addressing non-Gaussian signals, this study reformulated the sparse Bayesian learning framework under a generalized Bayesian paradigm, in which the model parameter is regulated with the minimum error entropy loss rather than a conventional likelihood function. Results: Our developed SBL-MEE algorithm was evaluated with two real-world brain decoding tasks of regression and classification scenarios, respectively. Experimental results demonstrated that our approach not only realizes superior brain decoding performance than existing methods, but also presents more physiologically interpretable decoder patterns. Conclusion: Although minimum error entropy is not constructed from an arbitrary probabilistic distribution, it is effective to establish noise-robust inference in sparse Bayesian learning method. Significance: This work provides a powerful tool to improve brain activity decoding capability, particularly regarding the noisy high-dimensional setting, thus promoting biomedical engineering applications such as brain-computer interface.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, where safety depends not only on how a system answers, but also on whether a query should be answered given a knowledge base (KB). Out-of-domain (OOD) queries can cause dense retrieval to surface weakly related context and lead the generator to produce fluent but unjustified responses. We study lightweight, KB-aligned OOD detection as an always-on gate for RAG systems. Our approach applies PCA to KB embeddings and scores queries in a compact subspace selected either by explained-variance retention (EVR) or by a separability-driven t-test ranking. We evaluate geometric semantic-search rules and lightweight classifiers across 16 domains, including high-stakes COVID-19 and Substance Use KBs, and stress-test robustness using both LLM-generated attacks and an in-the-wild 4chan attack. We find that low-dimensional detectors achieve competitive OOD performance while being faster, cheaper, and more interpretable than prompted LLM-based judges. Finally, human and LLM-based evaluations show that OOD queries primarily degrade the relevance of RAG outputs, showing the need for efficient external OOD detection to maintain safe, in-scope behavior.

Large reasoning models (LRMs) often exhibit overthinking, producing verbose Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces that increase inference cost and obscure the underlying reasoning process. Existing CoT compression methods mainly rely on global length rewards, which conflate necessary intermediate reasoning with redundant text and may therefore compromise reasoning fidelity. This paper revisits overthinking from a semantic-efficiency perspective and decomposes CoT redundancy into two distinct forms: internal redundancy, defined as informational stagnation before the first correct answer, and external redundancy, defined as superfluous continuation after the first correct answer. Based on this decomposition, we propose a dual-penalty reinforcement learning framework that separately optimizes reasoning progress and termination behavior. Specifically, a sliding-window semantic similarity metric penalizes low-progress reasoning segments, while a normalized external-redundancy metric discourages post-answer continuation. Experiments on GSM8K, MATH500, and AIME24 across different model scales show that our method reduces average reasoning length by 41.3% on the 1.5B model and 40.1% on the 7B model, while preserving competitive accuracy and achieving the best overall accuracy-efficiency score among evaluated baselines. The learned compression behavior further transfers to out-of-domain reasoning tasks, including GPQA and LiveCodeBench. More importantly, our analysis reveals a clear asymmetry between the two redundancy types: external redundancy can be largely removed with little performance loss, whereas internal redundancy compression follows a sensitive accuracy-efficiency trade-off. These results suggest that effective CoT compression should optimize semantic efficiency rather than sequence length alone, offering a principled route toward more concise, efficient, and interpretable LRMs.

Recent advances in continuous conditional generative modeling, including Continuous conditional Generative Adversarial Network (CcGAN) and Continuous Conditional Diffusion Model (CCDM), estimate high-dimensional data distributions conditioned on scalar regression labels such as angles, ages, or temperatures. However, fixed-size vicinal training in CcGAN can be sensitive to non-uniform label densities, whereas CCDM relies on computationally expensive iterative sampling. To address these issues, we propose CcGAN-AVAR, an imbalance-aware extension of CcGAN that combines soft/hybrid adaptive vicinity with auxiliary discriminator-guided regularization. The adaptive vicinity constructs a label-dependent local radius according to the available samples around each target condition, and the multi-task discriminator supplies both a regression signal for label consistency and a density-ratio-estimation signal for distribution matching. We further provide a theoretical interpretation characterizing how adaptive vicinal weighting affects the local bias-variance behavior of the discriminator target, how hybrid truncation reduces objective-level cross-condition mixing, and how the density-ratio-based generator penalty approximates a Pearson Chi-square discrepancy up to the estimation error of the density-ratio branch. Extensive experiments on four datasets, including the newly constructed imbalanced RC-49-I, covering resolutions from 64x64 to 256x256 across eleven settings, demonstrate that CcGAN-AVAR obtains strong generation quality and label consistency while preserving the one-step sampling efficiency of GANs, achieving 300x--2000x faster inference than CCDM.

Amodal segmentation aims to recover complete object shapes, including occluded regions, serving as an essential technique for user-centric multimedia authoring and object-level visual manipulation. Existing methods typically rely on informative prompts, such as bounding boxes or dense visible masks, which heavily degrade the user experience and interaction efficiency in real-world multimedia applications. While recent interactive paradigms (e.g., the Segment Anything Model) support lightweight point-based interactions, they often perform direct mask regression. Crucially, the opaque nature of these direct-regression models offers no visual explainability regarding how occluded structures are inferred, conflicting with the growing demand for interpretable multimedia systems. To address these limitations, we propose VELA, an end-to-end VElocity-driven Level-set Amodal segmentation method that enables explicit and transparent contour evolution driven by simple point clicks. VELA constructs an initial level set function from visual features and the user's point input, which then progressively evolves into the final amodal mask under the guidance of a shape-specific motion field predicted by a fully differentiable network. This mechanism learns to generate evolution dynamics at each step, ensuring that the spatial reasoning process is geometrically grounded, topologically flexible, and visually explainable to the user. Extensive experiments on COCOA-cls, D2SA, and KINS benchmarks demonstrate that VELA outperforms existing methods that use bounding-box or dense visible-mask prompts while requiring only a single-point prompt, validating the effectiveness of explainable geometric modeling for interactive multimedia tasks.

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine has enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning, a cornerstone of clinical practice. This has catalyzed a shift from single-step answer generation to the development of LLMs explicitly designed for medical reasoning. This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field. We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies (e.g., supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning) and test-time mechanisms (e.g., prompt engineering, multi-agent systems). We analyze how these techniques are applied across different data modalities (text, image, code) and in key clinical applications such as diagnosis, education, and treatment planning. Furthermore, we survey the evolution of evaluation benchmarks from simple accuracy metrics to sophisticated assessments of reasoning quality and visual interpretability. Based on an analysis of 60 seminal studies from 2022-2025, we conclude by identifying critical challenges, including the faithfulness-plausibility gap and the need for native multimodal reasoning, and outlining future directions toward building efficient, robust, and sociotechnically responsible medical AI.

While 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has established new standards for high-fidelity 3D scene modeling, interpreting massive, unstructured Gaussian primitives into meaningful geospatial entities remains a critical challenge for remote sensing and urban applications. Existing 2D-to-3D distillation methods suffer from projection ambiguities, geometric inconsistencies, and computational bottlenecks when applied to complex, large-scale topographies. Furthermore, current benchmarks lack natively aligned 2D-3D ground truth tailored for splatting-based representations. To address these limitations, we propose \textit{PointGauss}, a unified 3D-native framework for robust semantic parsing and instance segmentation. By treating Gaussian primitives as unstructured point sets, PointGauss leverages Point Transformer V3 (PTv3) to extract scale-invariant geometric features directly from Gaussian attributes, effectively resolving projection ambiguities. To ensure scalability in building-scale scenes, we introduce an adaptive region-of-interest cropping strategy and an instance-aware distance-constrained rasterization pipeline for pixel-level, view-consistent projection. Additionally, we present \textbf{SplatSeg-360}, the first rigorous cross-scale benchmark tailored for 3DGS, comprising 32 complex scenes with full 360$^\circ$ coverage and over 6,300 natively aligned 2D-3D masks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PointGauss operates in real-time and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Notably, it attains approximately 90% 3D-mIoU in large-scale building scenarios and roughly 80% 2D-mIoU in view-consistent 2D instance segmentation, outperforming baseline methods by 16%. (\href{https://github.com/hbycswt/pointgauss#}{Code})

Data augmentation is becoming increasingly important across various areas of time series analysis, including forecasting, classification, and anomaly detection. We introduce the Latent Generative Temporal Augmentation (L-GTA) model, a generative approach based on a Variational Autoencoder with a Bi-LSTM backbone and temporal self-attention. The model learns a latent representation for each timestep and applies controlled perturbations such as jittering, magnitude warping, or drift. We define an equivariance objective to further encourage consistency between latent space and data space transformations. As a result, the augmented samples show predictable and interpretable transformation signatures. We evaluate L-GTA on several real-world datasets against SOTA generative methods, including TimeGAN, TimeVAE, and Diffusion-TS, as well as direct transformation approaches. Across experiments on downstream forecasting, distribution fidelity, and controllability of transformation intensity, L-GTA consistently outperforms competing approaches. In downstream forecasting, it reduces prediction error by up to 26% compared to the strongest generative method and 27% relative to using the original data without augmentation.

Traditional topic models are effective at uncovering latent themes in large text collections. However, due to their reliance on bag-of-words representations, they struggle to capture semantically abstract features. While some neural variants use richer representations, they are similarly constrained by expressing topics as word lists, which limits their ability to articulate complex topics. We introduce Mechanistic Topic Models (MTMs), a class of topic models that operate on interpretable features learned by sparse autoencoders (SAEs). By defining topics over this semantically rich space, MTMs can reveal deeper conceptual themes with expressive feature descriptions. Moreover, uniquely among topic models, MTMs enable controllable text generation using topic steering vectors. To properly evaluate MTM topics against word list approaches, we propose \textit{topic judge}, an LLM-based pairwise comparison evaluation framework. Across eight datasets, MTMs match or exceed traditional and neural baselines on coherence metrics, are consistently preferred by topic judge, and enable effective LLM steering.

Many prediction tasks can admit multiple models that can perform almost equally well. This phenomenon can undermine interpretability and safety when competing models assign conflicting predictions to individuals. In this work, we study how arbitrariness can arise in probabilistic classification tasks as a result of an effect that we call \emph{observational multiplicity}. We discuss how this effect arises in a broad class of practical applications where we learn a classifier to predict probabilities $p_i \in [0,1]$ but are given a dataset of observations $y_i \in \{0,1\}$. We propose to evaluate the arbitrariness of individual probability predictions through the lens of \emph{regret}. We introduce a measure of regret for probabilistic classification tasks, which measures how the predictions of a model could change as a result of different training labels. We present a general-purpose method to estimate the regret in a probabilistic classification task. We use our measure to show that regret is often higher for certain groups in the dataset and discuss potential applications of regret. We demonstrate how estimating regret can be used to promote safety in real-world applications by abstention and data collection.

Geo-localization from a single image at planet scale (essentially an advanced or extreme version of the kidnapped robot problem) is a fundamental and challenging task in applications such as navigation, autonomous driving and disaster response due to the vast diversity of locations, environmental conditions, and scene variations. Traditional retrieval-based methods for geo-localization struggle with scalability and perceptual aliasing, while classification-based approaches lack generalization and require extensive training data. Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) offer a promising alternative by leveraging contextual understanding and reasoning. However, while VLMs achieve high accuracy, they are often prone to hallucinations and lack interpretability, making them unreliable as standalone solutions. In this work, we propose a novel hybrid geo-localization framework that combines the strengths of VLMs with retrieval-based visual place recognition (VPR) methods. Our approach first leverages a VLM to generate a prior, effectively guiding and constraining the retrieval search space. We then employ a retrieval step, followed by a re-ranking mechanism that selects the most geographically plausible matches based on feature similarity and proximity to the initially estimated coordinates. We evaluate our approach on multiple geo-localization benchmarks and show that it consistently outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods, particularly at street (up to 4.51%) and city level (up to 13.52%). Our results demonstrate that VLM-generated geographic priors in combination with VPR lead to scalable, robust, and accurate geo-localization systems.