Brain MRI
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Overview
Brain MRI research develops methods to measure brain anatomy and detect or characterize conditions such as tumors, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and neurodegeneration. Common approaches include U-Net-style segmentation, transformer and graph models, multimodal learning, and self-supervised foundation models, evaluated on datasets such as BraTS, ADNI, and IBSR. Other work reconstructs or enhances images, estimates biomarkers such as brain age, and uses language models to analyze scans and reports. A central challenge is ensuring that results generalize across scanners, sites, and patient groups while preserving clinically important details and demonstrating value beyond image-similarity scores or benchmark accuracy.
Latest papers
129 papers21 papers in the last four weeks, up 31% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.
A Target-Free Harmonization Method for MRI
BrainDINO: A Brain MRI Foundation Model for Generalizable Clinical Representation Learning
CNN-ViT Fusion with Adaptive Attention Gate for Brain Tumor MRI Classification: A Hybrid Deep Learning Model
an interpretable vision transformer framework for automated brain tumor classification
CAHAL: Clinically Applicable resolution enHAncement for Low-resolution MRI scans
Agentic Large Language Models for Training-Free Neuro-Radiological Image Analysis
A Two-Stage Multi-Modal MRI Framework for Lifespan Brain Age Prediction
Topology-Driven Fusion of nnU-Net and MedNeXt for Accurate Brain Tumor Segmentation on Sub-Saharan Africa Dataset
CLIMB: Controllable Longitudinal Brain Image Generation using Mamba-based Latent Diffusion Model and Gaussian-aligned Autoencoder
Improved Multiscale Structural Mapping with Supervertex Vision Transformer for the Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Neurodegeneration
Generative Modeling of Complex-Valued Brain MRI Data
Modality-Aware and Anatomical Vector-Quantized Autoencoding for Multimodal Brain MRI
Automated Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 7-tesla MRI Using U-net and Transformer-based Segmentation
DuSCN-FusionNet: An Interpretable Dual-Channel Structural Covariance Fusion Framework for ADHD Classification Using Structural MRI
Longitudinal Boundary Sharpness Coefficient Slopes Predict Time to Alzheimer's Disease Conversion in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Survival Analysis Using the ADNI Cohort
Cycle Inverse-Consistent TransMorph: A Balanced Deep Learning Framework for Brain MRI Registration
Brain Tumor Classification from 3D MRI Using Persistent Homology and Betti Features: A Topological Data Analysis Approach on BraTS2020
Reinforcing the Weakest Links: Modernizing SIENA with Targeted Deep Learning Integration
Agentic LLM Workflow for MR Spectroscopy Volume-of-Interest Placements in Brain Tumors
Interpretable Motion Artificat Detection in structural Brain MRI
A Unified Framework for Joint Detection of Lacunes and Enlarged Perivascular Spaces
Understanding Sources of Demographic Predictability in Brain MRI via Disentangling Anatomy and Contrast
DMD-augmented Unpaired Neural Schrödinger Bridge for Ultra-Low Field MRI Enhancement
Few-Shot Continual Learning for 3D Brain MRI with Frozen Foundation Models
MM-NeuroOnco: A Multimodal Benchmark and Instruction Dataset for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Diagnosis
Virtual Biopsy for Intracranial Tumors Diagnosis on MRI
Multimodal MRI Report Findings Supervised Brain Lesion Segmentation with Substructures
mild,'' possible''). Classical RSuper losses (e.g., sum volume consistency) can over-constrain or hallucinate unreported findings under such incompleteness, and are unable to utilize these hierarchical findings or exploit the priors of varied lesion types in a merged dataset. We explicitly parse the global quantitative and modality-wise qualitative findings and introduce a unified, one-sided, uncertainty-aware formulation (MS-RSuper) that: (i) aligns modality-specific qualitative cues (e.g., T1c enhancement, FLAIR edema) with their corresponding substructures using existence and absence losses; (ii) enforces one-sided lower-bounds for partial quantitative cues (e.g., largest lesion size, minimal multiplicity); and (iii) adds extra- vs. intra-axial anatomical priors to respect cohort differences. Certainty tokens scale penalties; missing cues are down-weighted. On 1238 report-labeled BraTS-MET/MEN scans, our MS-RSuper largely outperforms both a sparsely-supervised baseline and a naive RSuper method.