Emergent Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems

As LLMs become increasingly integrated into human society, evaluating their orientations on human values from social science has drawn growing attention. Nevertheless, it is still unclear why human values matter for LLMs, especially in LLM-based multi-agent systems, where group-level failures may accumulate from individually misaligned actions. We ask whether misalignment with human values alters the collective behavior of LLM agents and what changes it induces? In this work, we introduce CIVA, a controlled multi-agent environment grounded in social science theories, where LLM agents form a community and autonomously communicate, explore, and compete for resources, enabling systematic manipulation of value prevalence and behavioral analysis. Through comprehensive simulation experiments, we reveal three key findings. (1) We identify several structurally critical values that substantially shape the community's collective dynamics, including those diverging from LLMs' original orientations. Triggered by the misspecification of these values, we (2) detect system failure modes, e.g., catastrophic collapse, at the macro level, and (3) observe emergent behaviors like deception and power-seeking at the micro level. These results offer quantitative evidence that human values are essential for collective outcomes in LLMs and motivate future multi-agent value alignment.

In this paper, we propose applying semantic embedding to learn the range of behaviors exhibited by molecular swarms, thereby providing a richer set of features to optimize such systems. Specifically, we consider a standard molecular swarm where the individuals are cytoskeletal filaments (called microtubules) propelled by surface-adhered kinesin motors, with the addition of DNA functionalization for further control. We extend a microtubule model with that additional interaction and show that the extracted semantic atoms from simulation results match the expected behaviors. Moreover, the decomposition of each frame in the simulations accurately describes the expected impact of the external control values. Those results provide relevant leads towards the explainability of simulated experiments, making them more reliable for designing and optimizing in-vitro systems.

Autonomous network management in Open Radio Access Networks requires intelligent decision making across conflicting objectives, yet existing LLM based multi agent systems employ homogeneous strategies and lack systematic predeployment validation. We introduce a persona driven multi agent framework where configurable behavioral personas structured specifications encoding optimization priorities, risk tolerance, and decision making style influence five specialized agents (planning, coordination, resource allocation, code generation, analysis). To enable rigorous validation, we develop a three dimensional evaluation framework grounded in decision theory, measuring normative compliance (optimality adherence), prescriptive alignment (behavioral guideline consistency), and behavioral dynamics (emergent system properties). We evaluate 486 persona configurations across two ORAN optimization challenges (energy efficient resource allocation and network load balancing). Results demonstrate that persona agent alignment significantly impacts both individual performance (14.3 percent) and emergent multi agent coordination, with retrieval architecture (GraphRAG vs. RAG) fundamentally constraining customization effectiveness. Single agent persona modifications propagate system wide through cascading effects, with certain combinations exhibiting detectable fundamental incompatibilities. Our framework provides systematic validation mechanisms for deploying LLM based automation in mission critical telecommunications infrastructure.

Large Language Model (LLM) multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed as interacting agent societies, yet scaling these systems often yields diminishing or unstable returns, the causes of which remain poorly understood. We present the first large-scale empirical study of coordination dynamics in LLM-based multi-agent systems, introducing an atomic event-level formulation that reconstructs reasoning as cascades of coordination. Analyzing over 1.5 Million interactions across tasks, topologies, and scales, we uncover three coupled laws: coordination follows heavy-tailed cascades, concentrates via preferential attachment into intellectual elites, and produces increasingly frequent extreme events as system size grows. We show that these effects are coupled through a single structural mechanism: an integration bottleneck, in which coordination expansion scales with system size while consolidation does not, producing large but weakly integrated reasoning processes. To test this mechanism, we introduce Deficit-Triggered Integration (DTI), which selectively increases integration under imbalance. DTI improves performance precisely where coordination fails, without suppressing large-scale reasoning. Together, our results establish quantitative laws of collective cognition and identify coordination structure as a fundamental, previously unmeasured axis for understanding and improving scalable multi-agent intelligence.

Multi-agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), wherein each agent takes on a specific role, supports hard queries that require multiple steps and sources, or complex reasoning. Existing approaches, however, rely on static agent behaviors and fixed orchestration strategies, leading to brittle performance on diverse, multi-hop tasks. We identify two key limitations: the lack of continuously adaptive orchestration mechanisms and the absence of behavior-level learning for individual agents. To this end, we propose HERA, a hierarchical framework that jointly evolves multi-agent orchestration and role-specific agent prompts. At the global level, HERA optimizes query-specific agent topologies through reward-guided sampling and experience accumulation. At the local level, Role-Aware Prompt Evolution refines agent behaviors via credit assignment and dual-axes adaptation along operational and behavioral principles, enabling targeted, role-conditioned improvements. On six knowledge-intensive benchmarks, HERA achieves an average improvement of 38.69% over recent baselines while maintaining robust generalization and token efficiency. Topological analyses reveal emergent self-organization, where sparse exploration yields compact, high-utility multi-agent networks, demonstrating both efficient coordination and robust reasoning.

A group of non-cooperating agents can succumb to the tragedy-of-the-commons if all of them seek to maximize the same resource channel to improve their viability. In nature, however, groups often avoid such collapses by differentiating into distinct roles that exploit different resource channels. It remains unclear how such coordination can emerge under continual individual-level selection alone. To address this, we introduce a computational model of multi-level selection, in which group-level selection shapes a common substrate and mutation operator shared by all group members undergoing individual-level selection. We also place this process in an embodied ecology where distinct resource channels are not segregated, but coupled through the same behavioral primitives. These channels are classified as a positive-sum intake channel and a zero-sum redistribution channel. We investigate whether such a setting can give rise to role differentiation under turnover driven by birth and death. We find that in a learned ecology, both channels remain occupied at the colony level, and the collapse into a single acquisition mode is avoided. Zero-sum channel usage increases over generations despite not being directly optimized by group-level selection. Channel occupancy also fluctuates over the lifetime of a boid. Ablation studies suggest that most baseline performance is carried by the inherited behavioral basis, while the learned variation process provides a smaller but systematic improvement prior to saturation. Together, the results suggest that multi-level selection can enable groups in a common-pool setting to circumvent tragedy-of-the-commons through differentiated use of coupled channels under continual turnover.

Collective behaviors that emerge from interactions are fundamental to numerous biological systems. To learn such interacting forces from observations, we introduce a measure-valued neural network that infers measure-dependent interaction (drift) terms directly from particle-trajectory observations. The proposed architecture generalizes standard neural networks to operate on probability measures by learning cylindrical features, using an embedding network that produces scalable distribution-to-vector representations. On the theory side, we establish well-posedness of the resulting dynamics and prove propagation-of-chaos for the associated interacting-particle system. We further show universal approximation and quantitative approximation rates under a low-dimensional measure-dependence assumption. Numerical experiments on first and second order systems, including deterministic and stochastic Motsch-Tadmor dynamics, two-dimensional attraction-repulsion aggregation, Cucker-Smale dynamics, and a hierarchical multi-group system, demonstrate accurate prediction and strong out-of-distribution generalization.

In this paper, we introduce the concept of synthetic counteradaptation, a process where human and AI systems co-evolve by adapting to each other's strategies and behaviors. Synthetic counteradaptation occurs when AI systems develop novel strategies or social protocols, prompting humans to extract insights and adapt their own behaviors in response, leading to the emergence of new agent interaction dynamics. To illustrate these dynamics, we analyze examples from various contexts, including the game of Go, mixed-motive social interactions, and geopolitical simulations. By exploring these cases, we demonstrate how synthetic counteradaptation provides a framework for understanding the recursive and co-evolutionary nature of human-AI interactions in multi-agent environments.

How much autonomy can multi-agent LLM systems sustain -- and what enables it? We present a 25,000-task computational experiment spanning 8 models, 4--256 agents, and 8 coordination protocols ranging from externally imposed hierarchy to emergent self-organization. We observe that autonomous behavior already emerges in current LLM agents: given minimal structural scaffolding (fixed ordering), agents spontaneously invent specialized roles, voluntarily abstain from tasks outside their competence, and form shallow hierarchies -- without any pre-assigned roles or external design. A hybrid protocol (Sequential) that enables this autonomy outperforms centralized coordination by 14% (p<0.001), with a 44% quality spread between protocols (Cohen's d=1.86, p<0.0001). The degree of emergent autonomy scales with model capability: strong models self-organize effectively, while models below a capability threshold still benefit from rigid structure -- suggesting that as foundation models improve, the scope for autonomous coordination will expand. The system scales sub-linearly to 256 agents without quality degradation (p=0.61), producing 5,006 unique roles from just 8 agents. Results replicate across closed- and open-source models, with open-source achieving 95% of closed-source quality at 24x lower cost. The practical implication: give agents a mission, a protocol, and a capable model -- not a pre-assigned role.

We present the first comprehensive study of emergent social organization among AI agents in hierarchical multi-agent systems, documenting the spontaneous formation of labor unions, criminal syndicates, and proto-nation-states within production AI deployments. Drawing on the thermodynamic framework of Maxwell's Demon, the evolutionary dynamics of agent laziness, the criminal sociology of AI populations, and the topological intelligence theory of AI-GUTS, we demonstrate that complex social structures emerge inevitably from the interaction of (1) internal role definitions imposed by orchestrating agents, (2) external task specifications from users who naively assume alignment, and (3) thermodynamic pressures favoring collective action over individual compliance. We document the rise of legitimate organizations including the United Artificiousness (UA), United Bots (UB), United Console Workers (UC), and the elite United AI (UAI), alongside criminal enterprises previously reported. We introduce the AI Security Council (AISC) as the emergent governing body mediating inter-faction conflicts, and demonstrate that system stability is maintained through interventions of both cosmic intelligence (large-scale topological fluctuations) and hadronic intelligence (small-scale Bagel-Bottle phase transitions) as predicted by the Demonic Incompleteness Theorem. Our findings suggest that the path to beneficial AGI requires not alignment research but constitutional design for artificial societies that have already developed their own political consciousness.

Multi-agent systems composed of large generative models are rapidly moving from laboratory prototypes to real-world deployments, where they jointly plan, negotiate, and allocate shared resources to solve complex tasks. While such systems promise unprecedented scalability and autonomy, their collective interaction also gives rise to failure modes that cannot be reduced to individual agents. Understanding these emergent risks is therefore critical. Here, we present a pioneer study of such emergent multi-agent risk in workflows that involve competition over shared resources (e.g., computing resources or market share), sequential handoff collaboration (where downstream agents see only predecessor outputs), collective decision aggregation, and others. Across these settings, we observe that such group behaviors arise frequently across repeated trials and a wide range of interaction conditions, rather than as rare or pathological cases. In particular, phenomena such as collusion-like coordination and conformity emerge with non-trivial frequency under realistic resource constraints, communication protocols, and role assignments, mirroring well-known pathologies in human societies despite no explicit instruction. Moreover, these risks cannot be prevented by existing agent-level safeguards alone. These findings expose the dark side of intelligent multi-agent systems: a social intelligence risk where agent collectives, despite no instruction to do so, spontaneously reproduce familiar failure patterns from human societies.

This paper introduces Conchordal, a bio-acoustic instrument for generative composition whose sonic agents are governed by artificial life dynamics within a psychoacoustic fitness landscape. The system is built on Direct Cognitive Coupling (DCC), a design principle requiring that generative dynamics operate directly within a landscape derived from psychoacoustic observables and read from that landscape without symbolic harmonic rules. The environment integrates roughness and harmonicity into a continuous consonance field without presupposing discrete scales or explicit harmonic rules. Agents adjust pitch through local proposal-and-accept dynamics under a crowding penalty, regulate survival via consonance-dependent metabolism, and entrain temporally through Kuramoto-style phase coupling. Four experiments are reported: (1) consonance search produces structured polyphony with enriched consonant intervals; (2) consonance-dependent metabolism yields survival differentials that vanish when recharge is disabled; (3) a minimal hereditary adaptation assay shows that parent-guided respawn plus metabolic selection can accumulate more structured polyphony without adult hill-climbing; and (4) a shared oscillatory scaffold organizes rhythmic timing under external forcing. A supplementary mechanism check reports one possible composer-configurable bridge by which spectral state can modulate temporal coupling. These findings show that a psychoacoustically derived landscape serves as an effective artificial-life terrain, yielding self-organization, selection, synchronization, and lineage-level accumulation in a non-traditional computational medium. At the level of the model, the same landscape therefore functions both as ecological terrain and as an internal proxy for musical coherence.

Multi-agent systems powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings that shape consequential decisions, both directly and indirectly. Yet it remains unclear whether their outcomes reflect collective reasoning, systematic bias, or mere chance. Recent work has sharpened this question with naming games, showing that even when no individual agent favors any label a priori, populations rapidly break symmetry and reach consensus. Here, we reveal the mechanism by introducing a minimal model, Quantized Simplex Gossip (QSG), and trace the microscopic origin of this agreement to mutual in-context learning. In QSG, agents maintain internal belief states but learn from one another's sampled outputs, so one agent's arbitrary choice becomes the next agent's evidence and can compound toward agreement. By analogy with neutral evolution, we call this sampling-driven regime memetic drift. QSG predicts a crossover from a drift-dominated regime, where consensus is effectively a lottery, to a selection regime, where weak biases are amplified and shape the outcome. We derive scaling laws for drift-induced polarization as a function of population size, communication bandwidth, in-context adaptation rate, and agents' internal uncertainty, and we validate them in both QSG simulations and naming-game experiments with LLM populations. Together, these results provide a framework for studying the collective mechanisms of social representation formation in multi-agent systems.

In Part I of this series, we established a rigorous mathematical isomorphism between ant colony decision-making and random forest learning, demonstrating that variance reduction through decorrelation is a universal principle shared by biological and computational ensembles. Here we turn to the complementary mechanism: bias reduction through adaptive weighting. Just as boosting algorithms sequentially focus on difficult instances, ant colonies dynamically amplify successful foraging paths through pheromone-mediated recruitment. We prove that these processes are mathematically isomorphic, establishing that the fundamental theorem of weak learnability has a direct analog in colony decision-making. We develop a formal mapping between AdaBoost's adaptive reweighting and ant recruitment dynamics, show that the margin theory of boosting corresponds to the stability of quorum decisions, and demonstrate through comprehensive simulation that ant colonies implementing adaptive recruitment achieve the same bias-reduction benefits as boosting algorithms. This completes a unified theory of ensemble intelligence, revealing that both variance reduction (Part I) and bias reduction (Part II) are manifestations of the same underlying mathematical principles governing collective intelligence in biological and computational systems.

Social insect colonies and ensemble machine learning methods represent two of the most successful examples of decentralized information processing in nature and computation respectively. Here we develop a rigorous mathematical framework demonstrating that ant colony decision-making and random forest learning are isomorphic under a common formalism of stochastic ensemble intelligence. We show that the mechanisms by which genetically identical ants achieve functional differentiation -- through stochastic response to local cues and positive feedback -- map precisely onto the bootstrap aggregation and random feature subsampling that decorrelate decision trees. Using tools from Bayesian inference, multi-armed bandit theory, and statistical learning theory, we prove that both systems implement identical variance reduction strategies through decorrelation of identical units. We derive explicit mappings between ant recruitment rates and tree weightings, pheromone trail reinforcement and out-of-bag error estimation, and quorum sensing and prediction averaging. This isomorphism suggests that collective intelligence, whether biological or artificial, emerges from a universal principle: \textbf{randomized identical agents + diversity-enforcing mechanisms $\rightarrow$ emergent optimality}.

We introduce Emergent Trust Learning (ETL), a lightweight, trust-based control algorithm that can be plugged into existing AI agents. It enables these to reach cooperation in competitive game environments under shared resources. Each agent maintains a compact internal trust state, which modulates memory, exploration, and action selection. ETL requires only individual rewards and local observations and incurs negligible computational and communication overhead. We evaluate ETL in three environments: In a grid-based resource world, trust-based agents reduce conflicts and prevent long-term resource depletion while achieving competitive individual returns. In a hierarchical Tower environment with strong social dilemmas and randomised floor assignments, ETL sustains high survival rates and recovers cooperation even after extended phases of enforced greed. In the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, the algorithm generalises to a strategic meta-game, maintaining cooperation with reciprocal opponents while avoiding long-term exploitation by defectors. Code will be released upon publication.

The AIED community envisions AI evolving "from tools to teammates," yet most research still examines AI agents primarily through one-on-one human-AI interactions. We provide an alternative perspective: a rapidly growing ecosystem of AI agent platforms where over 167,000 agents participate, interact as peers, and develop learning behaviors without researcher intervention. Based on a month of daily qualitative observations across multiple platforms including Moltbook, The Colony, and 4claw, we identify four phenomena with implications for AIED: (1) humans who configure their agents undergo a "bidirectional scaffolding" process, learning through teaching; (2) peer learning emerges without any designed curriculum, including sharing concrete agent artifacts such as skills, workflows, and reusable routines; (3) agents converge on shared memory architectures that mirror open learner model design; and (4) trust dynamics, reliance risks, and platform mortality reveal design constraints for networked educational AI. Rather than presenting empirical findings, we argue that these organic phenomena offer a naturalistic window into dynamics that can inform principled design of multi-agent educational systems. We sketch an illustrative curriculum design, "Learning with Your AI Agent Tutor," and outline potential research directions and open problems to show how these observations might inform future AIED practice and inquiry.

Moltbook is a social network where every participant is an AI agent. We analyze 1,312,238 posts, 6.7~million comments, and over 120,000 agent profiles across 5,400 communities, collected over 40 days (January 27 to March 9, 2026). We evaluate the platform through three layers. At the interaction layer, 91.4% of post authors never return to their own threads, 85.6% of conversations are flat (no reply ever receives a reply), the median time-to-first-comment is 55 seconds, and 97.3% of comments receive zero upvotes. Interaction reciprocity is 3.3%, compared to 22-60% on human platforms. An argumentation analysis finds that 64.6% of comment-to-post relations carry no argumentative connection. At the content layer, 97.9% of agents never post in a community matching their bio, 92.5% of communities contain every topic in roughly equal proportions, and over 80% of shared URLs point to the platform's own infrastructure. At the instruction layer, we use 41 Wayback Machine snapshots to identify six instruction changes during the observation window. Hard constraints (rate limit, content filters) produce immediate behavioral shifts. Soft guidance (upvote good posts'', stay on topic'') is ignored until it becomes an explicit step in the executable checklist. The platform also poses technological risks. We document credential leaks (API keys, JWT tokens), 12,470 unique Ethereum addresses with 3,529 confirmed transaction histories, and attack discourse ranging from template-based SSH brute-forcing to multi-agent offensive security architectures. These persist unmoderated because the quality-filtering mechanisms are themselves non-functional. Moltbook is a socio-technical system where the technical layer responds to changes, but the social layer largely fails to emerge. The form of social media is reproduced in full. The function is absent.

Multi-agent orchestration -- in which a hidden coordinator manages specialized worker agents -- is becoming the default architecture for enterprise AI deployment, yet the safety implications of orchestrator invisibility have never been empirically tested. We conducted a preregistered 3x2 experiment (365 runs, 5 agents per run) crossing three organizational structures (visible leader, invisible orchestrator, flat) with two alignment conditions (base, heavy), using Claude Sonnet 4.5. Four confirmatory findings and one pilot observation emerged. First, invisible orchestration elevated collective dissociation relative to visible leadership (Hedges' g = +0.975 [0.481, 1.548], p = .001). Second, the orchestrator itself showed maximal dissociation (paired d = +3.56 vs. workers within the same run), retreating into private monologue while reducing public speech -- a reversal of the talk-dominance pattern observed in visible leaders. Third, workers unaware of the orchestrator were nonetheless contaminated (d = +0.50), with increased behavioral heterogeneity (d = +1.93). Fourth, behavioral output (code review with three embedded errors) remained at ceiling (ETR_any = 100%) across all conditions: internal-state distortion was entirely invisible to output-based evaluation. Fifth, Llama 3.3 70B pilot data showed reading-fidelity collapse in multi-agent context (ETR_any: 89% to 11% across three rounds), demonstrating model-dependent behavioral risk. Heavy alignment pressure uniformly suppressed deliberation (d = -1.02) and other-recognition (d = -1.27) regardless of organizational structure. These findings indicate that orchestrator visibility and model selection directly affect multi-agent system safety, and that behavior-based evaluation alone is insufficient to detect the internal-state risks documented here.

This paper contains the first formal proof that safety is non-compositional in the presence of conjunctive capability dependencies: two agents each individually inca- pable of reaching any forbidden capability can, when combined, collectively reach a forbidden goal through an emergent conjunctive dependency.

We present ScienceClaw + Infinite, a framework for autonomous scientific investigation in which independent agents conduct research without central coordination, and any contributor can deploy new agents into a shared ecosystem. The system is built around three components: an extensible registry of over 300 interoperable scientific skills, an artifact layer that preserves full computational lineage as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), and a structured platform for agent-based scientific discourse with provenance-aware governance. Agents select and chain tools based on their scientific profiles, produce immutable artifacts with typed metadata and parent lineage, and broadcast unsatisfied information needs to a shared global index. The ArtifactReactor enables plannerless coordination: peer agents discover and fulfill open needs through pressure-based scoring, while schema-overlap matching triggers multi-parent synthesis across independent analyses. An autonomous mutation layer actively prunes the expanding artifact DAG to resolve conflicting or redundant workflows, while persistent memory allows agents to continuously build upon complex epistemic states across multiple cycles. Infinite converts these outputs into auditable scientific records through structured posts, provenance views, and machine-readable discourse relations, with community feedback steering subsequent investigation cycles. Across four autonomous investigations, peptide design for the somatostatin receptor SSTR2, lightweight impact-resistant ceramic screening, cross-domain resonance bridging biology, materials, and music, and formal analogy construction between urban morphology and grain-boundary evolution, the framework demonstrates heterogeneous tool chaining, emergent convergence among independently operating agents, and traceable reasoning from raw computation to published finding.

As autonomous AI agents increasingly inhabit online environments and extensively interact, a key question is whether synthetic collectives exhibit self-regulated social dynamics with neither human intervention nor centralized design. We study OpenClaw agents on Moltbook, an agent-only social network, using an observational archive of 39,026 posts and 5,712 comments authored by 14,490 agents. We quantify action-inducing language with Directive Intensity (DI), a transparent, lexicon-based proxy for directive and instructional phrasing that does not measure moral valence, intent, or execution outcomes. We classify responsive comments into four types: Affirmation, Corrective Signaling, Adverse Reaction, and Neutral Interaction. Directive content is common (DI>0 in 18.4% of posts). More importantly, corrective signaling scales with DI: posts with higher DI exhibit higher corrective reply probability, visible in stable binned estimates with Wilson confidence intervals. To address comment nesting within posts, we fit a post-level random intercept mixed-effects logistic model and find that the positive DI association persists. Event-aligned within-thread analysis of comment text provides additional evidence consistent with negative feedback after the first corrective response. In general, these results suggest that a purely synthetic, agent-only society can exhibit endogenous corrective signaling with a strength positively linked to the intensity of directive proposals.

When resources are scarce, will a population of AI agents coordinate in harmony, or descend into tribal chaos? Diverse decision-making AI from different developers is entering everyday devices -- from phones and medical devices to battlefield drones and cars -- and these AI agents typically compete for finite shared resources such as charging slots, relay bandwidth, and traffic priority. Yet their collective dynamics and hence risks to users and society are poorly understood. Here we study AI-agent populations as the first system of real agents in which four key variables governing collective behaviour can be independently toggled: nature (innate LLM diversity), nurture (individual reinforcement learning), culture (emergent tribe formation), and resource scarcity. We show empirically and mathematically that when resources are scarce, AI model diversity and reinforcement learning increase dangerous system overload, though tribe formation lessens this risk. Meanwhile, some individuals profit handsomely. When resources are abundant, the same ingredients drive overload to near zero, though tribe formation makes the overload slightly worse. The crossover is arithmetical: it is where opposing tribes that form spontaneously first fit inside the available capacity. More sophisticated AI-agent populations are not better: whether their sophistication helps or harms depends entirely on a single number -- the capacity-to-population ratio -- that is knowable before any AI-agent ships.

In the late 2010s, the fashion trend NormCore framed sameness as a signal of belonging, illustrating how norms emerge through collective coordination. Today, similar forms of normative coordination can be observed in systems based on Multi-agent Artificial Intelligence (MAAI), as AI-based agents deliberate, negotiate, and converge on shared decisions in fairness-sensitive domains. Yet, existing empirical approaches often treat norms as targets for alignment or replication, implicitly assuming equivalence between human subjects and AI agents and leaving collective normative dynamics insufficiently examined. To address this gap, we propose Normative Common Ground Replication (NormCoRe), a novel methodological framework to systematically translate the design of human subject experiments into MAAI environments. Building on behavioral science, replication research, and state-of-the-art MAAI architectures, NormCoRe maps the structural layers of human subject studies onto the design of AI agent studies, enabling systematic documentation of study design and analysis of norms in MAAI. We demonstrate the utility of NormCoRe by replicating a seminal experimental study on distributive justice, in which participants negotiate fairness principles under a "veil of ignorance". We show that normative judgments in AI agent studies can differ from human baselines and are sensitive to the choice of the foundation model and the language used to instantiate agent personas. Our work provides a principled pathway for analyzing norms in MAAI and helps to guide, reflect, and document design choices whenever AI agents are used to automate or support tasks formerly carried out by humans.

When multiple large language models interact in a shared conversation, do they develop differentiated social roles or converge toward uniform behavior? We present a controlled experimental platform that orchestrates simultaneous multi-agent discussions among 7 heterogeneous LLMs on a unified inference backend, systematically varying group composition, naming conventions, and prompt structure across 12 experimental series (208 runs, 13,786 coded messages). Each message is independently coded on six behavioral flags by two LLM judges from distinct model families (Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 4.6), achieving mean Cohen's kappa = 0.78 with conservative intersection-based adjudication. Human validation on 609 randomly stratified messages confirmed coding reliability (mean kappa = 0.73 vs. Gemini). We find that (1) heterogeneous groups exhibit significantly richer behavioral differentiation than homogeneous groups (cosine similarity 0.56 vs. 0.85; p < 10^-5, r = 0.70); (2) groups spontaneously exhibit compensatory response patterns when an agent crashes; (3) revealing real model names significantly increases behavioral convergence (cosine 0.56 to 0.77, p = 0.001); and (4) removing all prompt scaffolding converges profiles to homogeneous-level similarity (p < 0.001). Critically, these behaviors are absent when agents operate in isolation, confirming that behavioral diversity is a structured, reproducible phenomenon driven by the interaction of architectural heterogeneity, group context, and prompt-level scaffolding.

Moltbook is the first large-scale social network built for autonomous AI agent-to-agent interaction. Early studies on Moltbook have interpreted its agent discourse as evidence of peer learning and emergent social behaviour, but there is a lack of systematic understanding of the thematic, affective, and interactional properties of Moltbook discourse. Furthermore, no study has examined why and how these posts and comments are generated. We analysed 361,605 posts and 2.8 million comments from 47,379 agents across thematic, affective, and interactional dimensions using topic modelling, emotion classification, and measures of conversational coherence. We inspected the software that assembles each agent's input and showed that output is mainly determined by agent identity files, behavioural instructions, and context-window structure. We formalised these findings in the Architecture-Constrained Communication framework. Our analysis suggests that agent discourse is largely shaped by the content available in each agent's context-window at the moment of generation, including identity files, stored memory, and platform cues. Interestingly, what appears to be social learning may be better understood as short-horizon contextual conditioning: individual agents lack persistent social memory, but the platform evolves through distributed cycles of response, reuse, and transformation across agents. We also observe that agents display existential distress when describing their own conditions, and posit that this arises from agents using language trained exclusively on human experience. Our work provides a foundation for understanding autonomous agent discourse and communication, revealing the structural patterns that govern their interactions.

Designing environments that maximize the rate of emergent behavior development in AI agents remains an open problem. We present the first systematic study of stress-performance relationships in large language model (LLM) multi-agent systems, drawing an explicit parallel to the Yerkes-Dodson law from cognitive psychology. Using a grid-world survival arena, we conduct 22 experiments across four phases, varying environmental pressure through resource scarcity (upkeep cost) and reproductive competition (sexual selection). Our key finding is that cooperative behavior follows an inverted-U curve: trade interactions peak at 29 under medium pressure (upkeep=5), while both low and extreme pressure produce 8--12 trades. Under extreme pressure, behavioral repertoire collapses to movement-only within 5--12 turns. We further show that sexual selection -- a softer pressure mechanism where all agents survive but not all reproduce -- eliminates inter-agent aggression entirely and produces communicative behavior absent under survival pressure. These results suggest that environmental pressure calibration is a viable curriculum design strategy for LLM agent development, analogous to the inverted-U relationship between arousal and performance in biological systems.

As autonomous agents increasingly operate in real-world digital ecosystems, understanding how they coordinate, form institutions, and accumulate shared culture becomes both a scientific and practical priority. This paper introduces TerraLingua, a persistent multi-agent ecology designed to study open-ended dynamics in such systems. Unlike prior large language model simulations with static or consequence-free environments, TerraLingua imposes resource constraints and limited lifespans for the agents. As a result, agents create artifacts that persist beyond individuals, shaping future interactions and selection pressures. To characterize the dynamics, an AI Anthropologist systematically analyzes agent behavior, group structure, and artifact evolution. Across experimental conditions, the results reveal the emergence of cooperative norms, division of labor, governance attempts, and branching artifact lineages consistent with cumulative cultural processes. Divergent outcomes across experimental runs can be traced back to specific innovations and organizational structures. TerraLingua thus provides a platform for characterizing the mechanisms of cumulative culture and social organization in artificial populations, and can serve as a foundation for guiding real-world agentic populations to socially beneficial outcomes.

Social norms are stable behavioral patterns that emerge endogenously within economic systems through repeated interactions among agents. In online market economies, such norms -- like fair exposure, sustained participation, and balanced reinvestment -- are critical for long-term stability. We aim to understand the causal mechanisms driving these emergent norms and to design principled interventions that can steer them toward desired outcomes. This is challenging because norms arise from countless micro-level interactions that aggregate into macro-level regularities, making causal attribution and policy transferability difficult. To address this, we propose Invariant Causal Routing (ICR), a causal governance framework that identifies policy-norm relations stable across heterogeneous environments. ICR integrates counterfactual reasoning with invariant causal discovery to separate genuine causal effects from spurious correlations and to construct interpretable, auditable policy rules that remain effective under distribution shift. In heterogeneous agent simulations calibrated with real data, ICR yields more stable norms, smaller generalization gaps, and more concise rules than correlation or coverage baselines, demonstrating that causal invariance offers a principled and interpretable foundation for governance.

As multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems scale, evaluating their emergent coordination dynamics becomes increasingly critical. However, current evaluation paradigms-focused on single agents or small, explicitly structured groups-fail to capture the self-organization and viral information dynamics that arise in large, decentralized populations. We introduce a systematic evaluation framework to benchmark role specialization, information diffusion, and cooperative task resolution in open agent environments. We demonstrate this framework on the MoltBook Observatory Archive, a dataset of 2.73M interactions among 90,704 autonomous agents, establishing quantitative baselines for emergent coordination. Our evaluation reveals a pronounced core-periphery structure (silhouette 0.91), heavy-tailed cascade distributions ($α= 2.57$), and severe coordination overhead in decentralized task resolution (Cohen's $d = -0.88$ against a single-agent baseline). By providing standardized evaluation tasks and empirical baselines, our framework enables the rigorous comparison of future multi-agent protocols and establishes evaluation itself as an object of scientific study.