Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Also known as MARL
Overview
Multi-agent reinforcement learning studies how multiple decision-makers learn when each agent’s actions affect both the environment and other agents, across cooperative, competitive, and mixed-motive settings. Common approaches include centralized training with decentralized execution, independent or shared actor-critic policies, value factorization such as QMIX, self-play and game-solving methods, and graph-based communication or hierarchical policies. Researchers test these methods in benchmarks such as SMAC, MPE, Overcooked, and multi-agent MuJoCo, and apply them to robotics, traffic, wireless networks, energy systems, and language-agent workflows. A central challenge is scaling coordination and credit assignment while keeping learning stable under non-stationarity and policies robust, safe, and fair with unfamiliar partners and conditions.
Latest papers
373 papers47 papers in the last four weeks, up 81% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
Exploiting Expertise of Non-Expert and Diverse Agents in Social Bandit Learning: A Free Energy Approach
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Based Chemical Plume Source Localization
Learning to Assist: Physics-Grounded Human-Human Control via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
UAV-MARL: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Time-Critical and Dynamic Medical Supply Delivery
COHORT: Hybrid RL for Collaborative Large DNN Inference on Multi-Robot Systems Under Real-Time Constraints
Quantum entanglement provides a competitive advantage in adversarial games
Octopus-inspired Distributed Control for Soft Robotic Arms: A Graph Neural Network-Based Attention Policy with Environmental Interaction
Code-Space Response Oracles: Generating Interpretable Multi-Agent Policies with Large Language Models
Strategically Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation
RQRE-OVI, an optimistic value iteration algorithm for computing RQRE with linear function approximation in large or continuous state spaces. Through finite-sample regret analysis, we establish convergence and explicitly characterize how sample complexity scales with rationality and risk-sensitivity parameters. The regret bounds reveal a quantitative tradeoff: increasing rationality tightens regret, while risk sensitivity induces regularization that enhances stability and robustness. This exposes a Pareto frontier between expected performance and robustness, with Nash recovered in the limit of perfect rationality and risk neutrality. We further show that the RQRE policy map is Lipschitz continuous in estimated payoffs, unlike Nash, and RQRE admits a distributionally robust optimization interpretation. Empirically, we demonstrate that RQRE-OVI achieves competitive performance under self-play while producing substantially more robust behavior under cross-play compared to Nash-based approaches. These results suggest RQRE-OVI offers a principled, scalable, and tunable path for equilibrium learning with improved robustness and generalization.