Readiness

The emergence of foundation models for molecular property prediction requires a high degree of AI data readiness, including reliable metadata annotation. However, both public repositories and industrial screening databases suffer from missing, inconsistent, or conflated assay annotations. In this work, we quantify the extent of missing annotations in PubChem for the BioAssay Ontology (BAO) assay format and physical detection method fields and investigate whether open-source and proprietary large language models (LLMs) can reliably predict and audit metadata annotations directly from the assay text. In our assessment, we found that the annotation coverage across PubChem's $\sim$2 million bioassays is critically sparse, 36% lacking an assay format, 89% a BioAssay type, and >99.9% any BAO-mapped assay format or detection technology term. This motivates the need for automated test-metadata curation. Using evaluation sets derived from PubChem and ChEMBL, we assess the agreement of seven open-source and proprietary LLMs with existing silver labels. Recall is at least 0.96 for biochemical and cell-based assay formats, with a similar pattern for detection technology, although disagreements increase on under-represented classes. Manual inspection shows that many of these disagreements trace back to inconsistencies between silver sources rather than to LLM error. Moreover, in a qualitative study with a senior industrial curator, LLM-generated evidence prompted the expert to revise some of their own labels, showing LLMs can flag potentially mislabeled assays. Across the study, performance differences between proprietary and open-source models were small. Together, these results suggest LLMs can support the large-scale annotation and auditing of assay metadata, though per-class reliability estimates and targeted human review remain necessary before such labels enter downstream ML pipelines.

We describe deploying imaging AI at six hospitals through PACS-AI, an open self-hosted platform. The binding constraint is not model accuracy but infrastructure to route studies, display results, capture feedback, and audit what runs. At one center, angiography models completed 515 of 607 jobs (84.8%); failures reflected absent diagnostic views, and 78.1% of 638 clinician ratings were positive. Publishing honest readiness levels for every model is itself a governance practice.

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a $3.50\times$ speedup.

Assessing the maturity of artificial intelligence technologies is essential for investment decisions, project management, and policy monitoring, yet the available readiness frameworks are heterogeneous and difficult to apply automatically: the adaptation of Technology Readiness Levels to AI lacks AI-specific gating criteria, the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels presuppose access to internal process artifacts, and AI/data readiness dimension models employ scales that resist direct comparison. This paper makes two contributions. First, we unify these three frameworks into the Unified AI Readiness Level (AIRL), a nine-level ordinal scale built on an environmental evidence ladder and complemented by dimensional caps (covering specification, data existence, data quality, data legality, expert knowledge, and algorithmic maturity) together with a generality-anchoring rule and explicit assignment disciplines, so that a readiness level becomes decidable from a natural-language description of the work alone. Second, we propose RAIL (Readiness Assessment via Independent LLM-experts), a panel-of-experts classifier that operationalizes the scale: one evidence agent and six independent dimension agents, each a large language model with a narrowly scoped mandate, deliver verdicts that a deterministic minimum rule aggregates and a chief expert reviews under asymmetric authority, confirming or lowering the panel's recommendation but never raising it above the caps. The method was tested in the analysis of several research works showing consistency and avoiding overestimation from monolithic LLM classifiers.

Large-taxonomy retrieval often assumes that the input already expresses the target concept. In many settings, however, the input is indirect evidence, such as a table cell whose meaning depends on its row, column, datatype, and context. We call this mismatch the retrieval readiness gap. Our analysis shows that the current index retrieves the target reliably when its semantics are explicit, while raw evidence often leaves it deep in the ranking. We propose Factorized Hypothesis Search (FHS), which maintains multiple partial interpretations over named semantic dimensions. These hypotheses support structured query rendering, multi-hypothesis retrieval, and dimension-level candidate verification. On both financial taxonomy tagging and CodiEsp clinical coding tasks, FHS achieves the best Recall@1, MRR, and final accuracy among the non-oracle methods. Replacing the factorized hypothesis path with a free-text ensemble causes the largest drop in head-ranking performance, while sequential refinement provides no additional gain over FHS's strong parallel first round.

Security Operations Centers (SOCs) process large volumes of security events, requiring analysts to accurately detect and assess ongoing cyberattacks under time pressure. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest potential benefits for security operations, yet their practical suitability for real-world SOC workflows remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with SOC practitioners who had prior experience with LLMs, complemented by interactive scenarios to anticipate challenges and identify opportunities for the responsible integration of LLM-based tools into SOC workflows. We identified 15 LLM use cases grouped into six functional categories. While LLMs are valued for automating repetitive, low-level tasks such as report automation, practitioners rate high-impact tasks such as incident analysis as not yet feasible, reporting limitations in technical depth, context awareness, and organization-specific knowledge. They locate these limitations less in the models than in the readiness of their SOCs and human factors driving over-reliance. Despite concerns, practitioners express a strong willingness to adopt LLMs, describing competitive pressure that leaves few alternatives. This work contributes an empirical, practitioner-driven analysis of LLM use across SOC roles and organizations and derives concrete design and integration requirements for human-centered, operationally safe LLM-assisted security operations.

Quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms in high energy physics (HEP) can efficiently represent and leverage long-range, high-order correlations in high-dimensional collider data, potentially with fewer parameters and favorable scaling relative to classical models. Deployment of QML in real-time collider applications such as trigger systems requires the ability to emulate and compile quantum circuits classically, then synthesize the resulting quantum gates onto low-latency hardware accelerators, namely field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). We present a study of variational quantum autoencoder models for real-time anomaly detection triggers in modern collider experiments. The models achieve performance comparable to state-of-the-art classical approaches and, after FPGA synthesis, satisfy resource usage and timing constraints consistent with trigger applications in future colliders. This work provides one of the first FPGA implementations of QML models for HEP triggers, enabling higher-capability models in today's classical data acquisition pipelines while advancing quantum readiness of collider experiment infrastructure.

Aerial robots are increasingly moving from remote observation toward physical interaction with objects, surfaces, structures, loads, and surrounding flows. This review argues that aerial manipulation cannot be understood as classical manipulation simply mounted on a flying base. Because flying agents remain aloft through continuous momentum and energy exchange with the surrounding medium, support, locomotion, stabilization, and task-directed interaction are intrinsically coupled. Building on broad views of manipulation as intentional environmental regulation through physical interaction, we propose a medium-aware interpretation of aerial manipulation in which interaction may be mediated by contact, by the surrounding fluid, or by both. The review organizes biological and robotic examples into a repertoire of interaction modes and a capability ladder, then develops an actuation-geometric viewpoint in which redundancy induces task-equivalent fibers. Internal motion along these fibers can trade energy for active readiness, aerodynamic promptness, and passive medium coupling. This perspective clarifies why aerial manipulation is difficult, why biological flyers remain broader than robotic systems, and how future platforms may command forces while also shaping how the medium acts back on them.

Leadership computing facilities steward large-scale scientific datasets that routinely require substantial transformation before serving as AI training data. However, no existing framework fully unifies automated transformation, readiness assessment, provenance tracking, and agent-native deployment. We present REDI, an open-source framework that addresses this gap through a unified five-stage pipeline (ingest, preprocess, transform, structure, and output) with per-stage instrumentation for reproducibility and deployment as an agent-callable skill; companion tool SetGo automates FAIR compliance and catalog publication. Evaluated across climate, proteomics, materials science, and nuclear fusion, REDI transforms all datasets from raw to AI-ready, with outputs validated against domain-expert references, and preliminary results show near-ideal parallel scaling to 100 nodes on Frontier for the climate case. Provenance-instrumented profiling reveals file I/O as the dominant pipeline cost, with format selection a first-order optimization lever. These results establish REDI as a cross-domain platform providing automated data readiness for scientific AI, transforming data preparation bottlenecks into reproducible, reusable community assets.

Public lithium-ion battery datasets are increasingly used for state-of-health estimation, remaining-useful-life prediction, anomaly detection, electrochemical diagnostics, second-life analytics, and battery safety research. However, these datasets vary substantially in chemistry, modality, scale, label quality, sequence structure, access status, and preprocessing complexity. These differences directly affect whether a dataset is feasible for near-term hybrid quantum-classical machine-learning workflows. This paper presents IonSense-QKG, a quantum-readiness metadata framework for lithium-ion battery dataset discovery. Starting from the EV-Battery-IonSense index, the proposed framework enriches public battery dataset records with quantum-relevant metadata, including task type, sensing modality, chemistry, label availability, sequence type, preprocessing requirements, candidate quantum encodings, estimated qubit range, and NISQ feasibility. A transparent Quantum Readiness Score is introduced to rank datasets as candidate resources for future hybrid quantum-classical battery benchmarks. The score is intended as a dataset-selection heuristic, not as evidence of quantum advantage. The framework demonstrates query-based discovery over enriched metadata to identify datasets suitable for compact quantum feature maps, quantum time-series workflows, limited-label anomaly detection, and future battery-health benchmarking. The released artifact includes metadata tables, scoring scripts, robustness checks, link-checking utilities, and SQL-style query examples. IonSense-QKG positions dataset selection as a data-management problem and provides a reproducible foundation for data-centric quantum battery analytics.

Team science holds that leadership is contingent: it helps only under specific conditions, and capable, autonomous teams may need none at all. We ask the analogous question for multi-agent LLM teams: under what measurable conditions does process-level coordination control add value, and do those conditions match what team science predicts? We use behavioral signatures (majority lock-in, exploration, recovery from an incorrect round-0 consensus) and per-action ablations, clean because each controller is an explicit action set, not a monolithic prompt. We operationalize three classical leadership styles (transactional, transformational, situational) as controllers over a shared action vocabulary (explore, revise, accept, synthesize). A matched controller with the same actions but an arbitrary rule recovers no better than majority voting, so the theory-derived rule, not the vocabulary, does the work. Across four task regimes and three open-weight model families, no controller dominates by accuracy, as the contingency view predicts: transactional control matches a shared round-0 vote on all 12 (model, regime) combinations to within 1.3pp, and gains appear only on the one combination where the round-0 majority is unreliable (llama-4-scout social; situational +8pp over flat). A recovery-advantage account, tested with four boundary probes, says a controller beats plain interaction only where the round-0 majority is unreliable, the task is recoverable, and undirected interaction does not already repair it. These regions map onto contingency theory (leadership substitutes, path-goal redundancy, the situational readiness gap), so a largely null accuracy result is what the theory predicts, not a failure of the controllers. We read process-level coordination control as a contingency to be measured and theory-mapped, not a leaderboard to be topped.

Simulation is a central tool for scalable robot learning, but its effectiveness depends on the quality of object assets. While modern 3D datasets provide rich geometric and kinematic representations, they typically lack the physical properties required for stable and realistic interaction, requiring significant manual effort to construct simulation-ready articulated objects. In this thesis, we introduce interaction-readiness, which characterizes whether an object can be reliably simulated under manipulation. We propose a quantitative evaluation framework that decomposes interaction-readiness into measurable components, enabling systematic analysis of object quality and revealing failure modes not captured by conventional evaluation. We further present a multi-modal, simulator-in-the-loop approach for generating interaction-ready articulated objects from incomplete 3D assets. The method integrates geometric, visual, and semantic information to infer physical properties and refines them through iterative simulator feedback to improve physical consistency. Experiments across diverse articulated objects and manipulation tasks show that object quality directly impacts simulation stability, interaction behavior, and policy performance. Objects refined by our method exhibit more stable and realistic dynamics, enabling more reliable downstream learning and evaluation. Overall, this thesis demonstrates the importance of physical realism for articulated objects in simulation and introduces a practical multi-modal refinement approach, guided by simulator feedback, for constructing such objects at scale.

Pipeline parallelism is a key technique for scaling large-model training, but modern workloads exhibit runtime variability in computation and communication. Existing pipeline systems typically consume static, profiled, or adaptively generated schedules as pre-committed execution orders. When realized task readiness diverges from the pre-committed order, stages may wait for not-yet-ready work even though other executable work is available, creating stage misalignment, idle bubbles, and reduced utilization. We present Runtime-Readiness-First Pipeline (RRFP), a readiness-driven runtime for pipeline-parallel training. RRFP changes how schedules are consumed at runtime: instead of treating a schedule as a sequence that stages must wait to follow, it treats the schedule as a non-binding hint order for ranking currently ready work. To support this model, RRFP combines message-driven asynchronous communication, lightweight tensor-parallel coordination for collective consistency, and ready-set arbitration for low-overhead dispatch. We implement RRFP in a Megatron-based training framework and evaluate it on language-only and multimodal workloads at up to 128 GPUs. RRFP improves over fixed-order pipeline baselines across all settings. Using the BFW hint, RRFP achieves up to 1.77$\times$ speedup on language-only workloads and up to 2.77$\times$ on multimodal workloads. In cross-framework comparisons, RRFP with the default BF hint outperforms the faster available external system by up to 1.84$\times$ while preserving training correctness.

Deep continual learning requires models to adapt to new tasks without retraining from scratch. However, neural networks can lose their ability to adapt to new tasks after training on previous ones, a phenomenon known as loss of plasticity. There have been several explanations and diagnostics proposed for plasticity loss. Motivated by the philosophy that "all models are wrong, but some are useful", we ask: can existing diagnostics predict a neural network's plasticity? In this work, we take a practical view to interpret plasticity as trainability, i.e., a neural network's future optimization gain on a target task. We first take a theoretical approach, showing, by constructing a few counterexamples, that some widely adopted diagnostics of plasticity, including representation rank and neural tangent kernel rank, can fail to predict the loss of trainability in both regression and classification settings. We instead propose a novel metric, called optimization readiness, which combines gradient strength and gradient reliability. We prove that optimization readiness lower bounds one-step optimization gain under standard smoothness assumptions, providing a theoretical guarantee for its predictive power. Empirically, we show that across commonly used deep continual learning settings, such as Slowly-Changing Regression and Permuted MNIST, optimization readiness more reliably ranks checkpoints by trainability than prior diagnostics, even with substantially fewer samples.

Stage-wise audio-visual encoders propagate fused intermediate states across layers, making the formation of later representations depend on the readiness of earlier fusion states. Strong local audio-visual agreement provides useful correspondence evidence, yet a fused state also needs sufficient cross-layer and cross-modal support before it can reliably guide later fusion. This paper studies this issue through propagation-aware representation readiness and formulates premature perceptual commitment as a readiness-deficiency problem, where local plausibility, propagation influence, and support insufficiency jointly appear at an intermediate stage. We propose the Delayed Perceptual Commitment Network (DPC-Net), an encoder-level framework that estimates an observable readiness-deficiency surrogate, localizes the intervention-sensitive bottleneck, and applies support-aware correction with cross-layer and cross-modal evidence. DPC-Net preserves task-specific heads, losses, decoding modules, and evaluation protocols, making it applicable to different audio-visual tasks through encoder-side intervention. Experiments on audio-visual speech separation, audio-visual event localization, and audio-visual speech recognition show consistent improvements across reconstruction, localization, and recognition regimes. Further analyses on component contribution, selection criteria, counterfactual intervention, and readiness trajectories support the effectiveness of readiness-guided bottleneck correction.

AI-for-Science (AI4Science) is increasingly transforming scientific discovery by embedding machine learning models into prediction, simulation, and hypothesis generation workflows across domains. However, the effectiveness of these models is fundamentally constrained by the AI-readiness of scientific data, for which no scalable and systematic evaluation mechanism currently exists. In this work, we propose SciHorizon-DataEVA, a novel agentic system to scalable AI-readiness evaluation of heterogeneous scientific data. At the evaluation-criteria level, we introduce the Sci-TQA2 principles, which organize AI-readiness into four complementary dimensions: Governance Trustworthiness, Data Quality, AI Compatibility, and Scientific Adaptability. Each dimension is decomposed into measurable atomic elements that enable fine-grained and executable assessment. To operationalize these principles at scale, we develop Sci-TQA2-Eval, a hierarchical multi-agent evaluation approach orchestrated through a directed, cyclic workflow. Our Sci-TQA2-Eval dynamically constructs dataset-aware evaluation specifications by combining lightweight dataset profiling, applicability-aware metric activation, and knowledge-augmented planning grounded in domain constraints and dataset-paper signals. These specifications are executed through an adaptive, tool-centric evaluation mechanism with built-in verification and self-correction, enabling scalable and reliable assessment across heterogeneous scientific data. Extensive experiments on scientific datasets spanning multiple domains demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of SciHorizon-DataEVA for principled AI-readiness evaluation.

Which tasks inside an enterprise workflow can a large-language-model agent reliably handle, and under what conditions? Most business process modeling frameworks still answer this at the activity level, even though a single activity can bundle work of radically different difficulty. This paper takes the analysis a step smaller. We describe two design artifacts developed in a financial-services IT setting: T-IPO, which represents each task as an eight-element tuple, and LARA (LLM Agent Readiness Assessment), a five-dimension rubric that scores a task's readiness for agent substitution. Compliance Sensitivity carries $1.5\times$ weight, a value we fixed through a three-round Delphi study and cross-checked with AHP. The rubric produces four levels, L1 to L4, and applies a floor rule so that a task with maximum compliance load cannot be classified below L3 no matter what the other scores say. Both artifacts sit inside a larger methodology (PARTIS) that we map onto BWW ontology in Section 3. We evaluate the instruments across 127 tasks. Inter-rater agreement reaches Fleiss' $κ= 0.80$; a replication at three further institutions returns $κ= 0.73$. A controlled comparison against activity-level assessment suggests, though does not prove, an improvement in predictive utility at the task level. Pilot deployment of 120 task instances confirms that auto-completion decays monotonically from $95\%$ at L1 through about $70\%$ at L2 to about $40\%$ at L3. Exploratory factor analysis points to a two-factor structure: task readiness seems to be determined jointly by cognitive-execution complexity and governance-compliance intensity. We close with a recalibration procedure (LARA-TCA) so the rubric can keep pace with evolving LLM capabilities.

Visual navigation models often struggle in real-world dynamic environments due to limited robustness to the sim-to-real gap and the difficulty of training policies tailored to target deployment environments (e.g., households, restaurants, and factories). Although real-to-sim navigation simulation using 3D Gaussian Splatting (GS) can mitigate these challenges, prior GS-based works have considered only static scenes or non-photorealistic human obstacles built from simulator assets, despite the importance of safe navigation in dynamic environments. To address these issues, we propose ReaDy-Go, a novel real-to-sim simulation pipeline that synthesizes photorealistic dynamic scenarios in target environments by augmenting a reconstructed static GS scene with dynamic human GS obstacles, and trains navigation policies using the generated datasets. The pipeline provides three key contributions: (1) a dynamic GS simulator that integrates static scene GS with a human animation module, enabling the insertion of animatable human GS avatars and the synthesis of plausible human motions from 2D trajectories, (2) a navigation dataset generation framework that leverages the simulator along with a robot expert planner designed for dynamic GS representations and a human planner, and (3) robust navigation policies to both the sim-to-real gap and moving obstacles. The proposed simulator generates thousands of photorealistic navigation scenarios with animatable human GS avatars from arbitrary viewpoints. ReaDy-Go outperforms baselines across target environments in both simulation and real-world experiments, demonstrating improved navigation performance even after sim-to-real transfer and in the presence of moving obstacles. Moreover, zero-shot sim-to-real deployment in an unseen environment indicates its generalization potential. Project page: https://syeon-yoo.github.io/ready-go-site/.