VLM Evaluation

VLM: Vision-Language Model

Ask about this topic

Overview

Vision-language model evaluation studies what these systems can infer from images and video, and whether their answers are supported by visual evidence. Researchers use broad benchmarks alongside controlled probes, counterfactual edits, and stage-wise tests covering tasks such as spatial reasoning, charts and documents, medical imaging, and long-video understanding. They assess not only accuracy but also grounding, hallucination, calibration, robustness, bias, and abstention, often comparing models with human or specialist judgments. A central challenge is that high benchmark scores can reflect language priors or shortcuts rather than reliable visual understanding, and performance often falters on fine-grained, temporal, compositional, or unfamiliar tasks.

Latest papers

CardsList

999 papers122 papers in the last four weeks, up 12% on the four weeks before. 0.7% of all new papers.

Apr 22, 2026

Evaluating Remote Sensing Image Captions Beyond Metric Biases

The core objective of image captioning is to achieve lossless semantic compression from visual signals into textual modalities. However, the reliance on manually curated reference texts for evaluation essentially forces models to mimic specific human annotation styles, thereby masking the true descriptive capabilities of advanced foundation models. This systemic misalignment prompts a critical question: Is task-specific fine-tuning truly necessary for Remote Sensing Image Captioning, or is the perceived performance gap merely an artifact of flawed evaluation criteria? To investigate this discrepancy, we propose ReconScore, a novel reference-free evaluation metric. Rather than computing textual similarities, we assess caption quality by its capability to reconstruct the original visual elements solely from the generated text, effectively neutralizing human annotation biases. Applying this metric, we uncover a profound, counterintuitive truth: inherently powerful, unfine-tuned MLLMs surpass their fine-tuned counterparts in authentic zero-shot RSIC tasks. Driven by this structural discovery, we introduce RemoteDescriber, a completely training-free generation methodology. By employing ReconScore as a self-correction mechanism, we iteratively refine the semantic precision of MLLM outputs without any computational fine-tuning overhead. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that RemoteDescriber achieves state-of-the-art performance on three datasets. Furthermore, we validate ReconScore's reliability and analyze the flaws of traditional metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhu-czy/RemoteDescriber.

Ziyun Chen, Fan Liu, Liang Yao +3

Hohai University Nanjing, China · Cardiff University Cardiff, UK

VLM EvaluationRemote Sensing Image UnderstandingRemote Sensing Image CaptioningLLM Self-RefinementLarge Vision-Language Models
AskPDF
Apr 22, 2026

EgoDyn-Bench: Evaluating Ego-Motion Understanding in Vision-Centric Foundation Models for Autonomous Driving

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced high-level reasoning in autonomous driving, their ability to ground this reasoning in the underlying physics of ego-motion remains poorly understood. We introduce EgoDyn-Bench [Project page: (https://tum-avs.github.io/EgoDyn-Bench-Website/), Code: (https://github.com/TUM-AVS/EgoDyn-Bench), Dataset: (https://huggingface.co/datasets/fnc1901/EgoDyn-Bench)], a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating the semantic ego-motion understanding of vision-centric foundation models. By mapping continuous vehicle kinematics to discrete motion concepts via a deterministic oracle, we decouple a model's internal physical logic from its visual perception. Our large-scale empirical audit spanning 20++ models, including closed-source MLLMs, open-source VLMs across multiple scales, and specialized VLAs, identifies a significant Perception Bottleneck: while models exhibit logical physical concepts, they consistently fail to accurately align them with visual observations, frequently underperforming classical non-learned geometric baselines. This failure persists across model scales and domain-specific training, indicating a structural deficit in how current architectures couple visual perception with physical reasoning. We demonstrate that providing explicit trajectory encodings substantially restores physical consistency across all evaluated models, revealing a functional disentanglement between vision and language: ego-motion logic is derived almost exclusively from the language modality, while visual observations contribute negligible temporal signal. This structural finding provides a standardized diagnostic framework and a practical pathway toward physically aligned embodied AI. Ego-motion - Physical Reasoning - Foundation Models

Finn Rasmus Schäfer, Yuan Gao, Dingrui Wang +5

Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany · Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Munich, Germany · Data Analytics and Machine Learning Group, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

VLM EvaluationAutonomous Driving BenchmarksVLMs for Autonomous DrivingVision Foundation ModelsAutonomous Driving PerceptionVLM Reasoning
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026

Culturally uneven urban perception in large language models

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to describe and evaluate cities, yet the cultural structure of their urban judgments remains understudied. Here we introduce a measurement framework for testing whether LLM-based urban perception is culturally neutral, using a globally stratified street-view image dataset. Open-ended descriptions and structured scores generated by three frontier multimodal models all show that the neutral baseline lies closer to regional framings associated with Europe and North America than to other cultural framings. Comparisons between AI and human urban perception further show that prompting can move AI responses closer to specific regional human descriptions, but fails to recover the variety and diversity of human responses, flattening observed demographic patterns and introducing sentiment-based self-favouring bias. These results indicate a systematic risk in treating AI as a neutral tool for urban tasks, especially when model outputs are used to compare, evaluate or represent cities across cultural contexts.

Rong Zhao, Wanqi Liu, Zhizhou Sha +3

Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), UCL, London, UK · Department of Computer Science, UT Austin, Austin, TX, USA · School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

VLM EvaluationSocial Bias in Language ModelsCultural Bias in Language ModelsCultural Knowledge in Language Models
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026

DistortBench: Benchmarking Vision Language Models on Image Distortion Identification

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in settings where sensitivity to low-level image degradations matters, including content moderation, image restoration, and quality monitoring. Yet their ability to recognize distortion type and severity remains poorly understood. We present DistortBench, a diagnostic benchmark for no-reference distortion perception in VLMs. DistortBench contains 13,500 four-choice questions covering 27 distortion types, six perceptual categories, and five severity levels: 25 distortions inherit KADID-10k calibrations, while two added rotation distortions use monotonic angle-based levels. We evaluate 18 VLMs, including 17 open-weight models from five families and one proprietary model. Despite strong performance on high-level vision-language tasks, the best model reaches only 61.9% accuracy, just below the human majority-vote baseline of 65.7% (average individual: 60.2%), indicating that low-level perceptual understanding remains a major weakness of current VLMs. Our analysis further reveals weak and non-monotonic scaling with model size, performance drops in most base--thinking pairs, and distinct severity-response patterns across model families. We hope DistortBench will serve as a useful benchmark for measuring and improving low-level visual perception in VLMs.

Divyanshu Goyal, Akhil Eppa, Vanya Bannihatti Kumar

Adobe Inc.

VLM EvaluationBenchmark ConstructionImage Quality Assessment
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026

Assessing VLM-Driven Semantic-Affordance Inference for Non-Humanoid Robot Morphologies

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding human-object interactions, but their application to robotic systems with non-humanoid morphologies remains largely unexplored. This work investigates whether VLMs can effectively infer affordances for robots with fundamentally different embodiments than humans, addressing a critical gap in the deployment of these models for diverse robotic applications. We introduce a novel hybrid dataset that combines annotated real-world robotic affordance-object relations with VLM-generated synthetic scenarios, and perform an empirical analysis of VLM performance across multiple object categories and robot morphologies, revealing significant variations in affordance inference capabilities. Our experiments demonstrate that while VLMs show promising generalisation to non-humanoid robot forms, their performance is notably inconsistent across different object domains. Critically, we identify a consistent pattern of low false positive rates but high false negative rates across all morphologies and object categories, indicating that VLMs tend toward conservative affordance predictions. Our analysis reveals that this pattern is particularly pronounced for novel tool use scenarios and unconventional object manipulations, suggesting that effective integration of VLMs in robotic systems requires complementary approaches to mitigate over-conservative behaviour while preserving the inherent safety benefits of low false positive rates.

Jess Jones, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Sabine Hauert

Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of Bristol Bristol, United Kingdom · University of Bristol Bristol, United Kingdom

VLM EvaluationCross-Embodiment Robot LearningRobotic Affordance InferenceVLMs for Robotics
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026

Seeing Candidates at Scale: Multimodal LLMs for Visual Political Communication on Instagram

This paper presents a computational case study that evaluates the capabilities of specialized machine learning models and emerging multimodal large language models for Visual Political Communication (VPC) analysis. Focusing on concentrated visibility in Instagram stories and posts during the 2021 German federal election campaign, we compare the performance of traditional computer vision models (FaceNet512, RetinaFace, Google Cloud Vision) with a multimodal large language model (GPT-4o) in identifying front-runner politicians and counting individuals in images. GPT-4o outperformed the other models, achieving a macro F1-score of 0.89 for face recognition and 0.86 for person counting in stories. These findings demonstrate the potential of advanced AI systems to scale and refine visual content analysis in political communication while highlighting methodological considerations for future research.

Michael Achmann-Denkler, Mario Haim, Christian Wolff

Media Informatics Group University of Regensburg Regensburg, Germany · Department of Media and Communication Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany

VLM EvaluationSocial Media AnalysisFace Recognition
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026

Lost in Translation: Do LVLM Judges Generalize Across Languages?

Automatic evaluators such as reward models play a central role in the alignment and evaluation of large vision-language models (LVLMs). Despite their growing importance, these evaluators are almost exclusively assessed on English-centric benchmarks, leaving open the question of how well these evaluators generalize across languages. To answer this question, we introduce MM-JudgeBench, the first large-scale benchmark for multilingual and multimodal judge model evaluation, which includes over 60K pairwise preference instances spanning 25 typologically diverse languages. MM-JudgeBench integrates two complementary subsets: a general vision-language preference evaluation subset extending VL-RewardBench, and a chart-centric visual-text reasoning subset derived from OpenCQA, enabling systematic analysis of reward models (i.e., LVLM judges) across diverse settings. We additionally release a multilingual training set derived from MM-RewardBench, disjoint from our evaluation data, to support domain adaptation. By evaluating 22 LVLMs (15 open-source, 7 proprietary), we uncover substantial cross-lingual performance variance in our proposed benchmark. Our analysis further shows that model size and architecture are poor predictors of multilingual robustness, and that even state-of-the-art LVLM judges exhibit inconsistent behavior across languages. Together, these findings expose fundamental limitations of current reward modeling and underscore the necessity of multilingual, multimodal benchmarks for developing reliable automated evaluators.

Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Mir Tafseer Nayeem +5

York University · University of Alberta · Nanyang Technological University +1

Multimodal Model EvaluationMultilingual VLM EvaluationMultimodal Reward ModelingVLM EvaluationVision-Language Model-as-a-JudgeCross-Lingual Consistency in Language Models+1
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026

Disparities In Negation Understanding Across Languages In Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit affirmation bias: a systematic tendency to select positive captions ("X is present") even when the correct description contains negation ("no X"). While prior work has documented this failure mode in English and proposed solutions, negation manifests differently across languages through varying morphology, word order, and cliticization patterns, raising the question of whether these solutions serve all linguistic communities equitably. We introduce the first human-verified multilingual negation benchmark, spanning seven typologically diverse languages: English, Mandarin Chinese, Arabic, Greek, Russian, Tagalog, and Spanish. Evaluating three VLMs - CLIP, SigLIP, and MultiCLIP - we find that standard CLIP performs at or below chance on non-Latin-script languages, while MultiCLIP achieves the highest and most uniform accuracy. We also evaluate SpaceVLM, a proposed negation correction, and find that it produces substantial improvements for several languages - particularly English, Greek, Spanish, and Tagalog - while showing varied effectiveness across typologically different languages. This variation reveals that linguistic properties like morphology, script, and negation structure interact with model improvements in fairness-relevant ways. As VLMs are deployed globally, multilingual benchmarks are essential for understanding not just whether solutions work, but for whom.

Charikleia Moraitaki, Sarah Pan, Skyler Pulling +3

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

VLM EvaluationVision-Language ModelsMultilingual VLM EvaluationVLM Reasoning
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

LLM-as-Judge Framework for Evaluating Tone-Induced Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings where reliable visual grounding carries operational consequences, yet their behavior under progressively coercive prompt phrasing remains undercharacterized. Existing hallucination benchmarks predominantly rely on neutral prompts and binary detection, leaving open how both the incidence and the intensity of fabrication respond to graded linguistic pressure across structurally distinct task types. We present Ghost-100, a procedurally constructed benchmark of 800 synthetically generated images spanning eight categories across three task families: text-illegibility, time-reading, and object-absence, each designed under a negative-ground-truth principle that guarantees the queried target is absent, illegible, or indeterminate by construction. Every image is paired with five prompts drawn from a structured 5-Level Prompt Intensity Framework, holding the image and task identity fixed while varying only directive force, so that tone is isolated as the sole independent variable. We adopt a dual-track evaluation protocol: a rule-based H-Rate measuring the proportion of responses in which a model crosses from grounded refusal into unsupported positive commitment, and a GPT-4o-mini-judged H-Score on a 1-5 scale characterizing the confidence and specificity of fabrication once it occurs. We additionally release a three-stage automated validation workflow, which retrospectively confirms 717 of 800 images as strictly compliant. Evaluating nine open-weight VLMs, we find that H-Rate and H-Score dissociate substantially across model families, reading-style and presence-detection subsets respond to prompt pressure in qualitatively different ways, and several models exhibit non-monotonic sensitivity peaking at intermediate tone levels: patterns that aggregate metrics obscure.

Zhiyuan Jiang, Weihao Hong, Xinlei Guan +8

Kean University, USA · North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA · McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada +1

VLM EvaluationHallucination Detection in VLMsVLM HallucinationObject Hallucination in VLMs
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

Revisiting Change VQA in Remote Sensing with Structured and Native Multimodal Qwen Models

Change visual question answering (Change VQA) addresses the problem of answering natural-language questions about semantic changes between bi-temporal remote sensing (RS) images. Although vision-language models (VLMs) have recently been studied for temporal RS image understanding, Change VQA remains underexplored in the context of modern multimodal models. In this letter, we revisit the CDVQA benchmark using recent Qwen models under a unified low-rank adaptation (LoRA) setting. We compare Qwen3-VL, which follows a structured vision-language pipeline with multi-depth visual conditioning and a full-attention decoder, with Qwen3.5, a native multimodal model that combines a single-stage alignment with a hybrid decoder backbone. Experimental results on the official CDVQA test splits show that recent VLMs improve over earlier specialized baselines. They further show that performance does not scale monotonically with model size, and that native multimodal models are more effective than structured vision-language pipelines for this task. These findings indicate that tightly integrated multimodal backbones contribute more to performance than scale or explicit multi-depth visual conditioning for language-driven semantic change reasoning in RS imagery.

Yakoub Bazi, Mohamad M. Al Rahhal, Mansour Zuair +1

Computer Engineering Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia · Applied Computer Science Department, College of Applied Computer Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

VLM EvaluationRemote Sensing Image UnderstandingVisual Question AnsweringRemote Sensing VQAMultimodal Large Language ModelsRemote Sensing VLMs
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

Multilingual Training and Evaluation Resources for Vision-Language Models

Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieved rapid progress in the recent years. However, despite their growth, VLMs development is heavily grounded on English, leading to two main limitations: (i) the lack of multilingual and multimodal datasets for training, and (ii) the scarcity of comprehensive evaluation benchmarks across languages. In this work, we address these gaps by introducing a new comprehensive suite of resources for VLMs training and evaluation spanning five European languages (English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish). We adopt a regeneration-translation paradigm that produces high-quality cross-lingual resources by combining curated synthetic generation and manual annotation. Specifically, we build Multi-PixMo, a training corpus obtained regenerating examples from Pixmo pre-existing datasets with permissively licensed models: PixMo-Cap, PixMo-AskModelAnything, and CoSyn-400k. On the evaluation side, we construct a set of multilingual benchmarks derived translating widely used English datasets (MMbench, ScienceQA, MME, POPE, AI2D). We assess the quality of these resources through qualitative and quantitative human analyses, measuring inter-annotator agreement. Additionally, we perform ablation studies to demonstrate the impact of multilingual data, with respect to English only, in VLMs training. Experiments, comprising 3 different models show that using multilingual, multimodal examples for training VLMs aids is consistently beneficial on non-English benchmarks, with positive transfer to English as well.

Daniela Baiamonte, Elena Fano, Matteo Gabburo +3

Aithlas

VLM EvaluationVision-Language ModelsMultilingual VLM EvaluationVision-Language Pretraining
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

Unmasking the Illusion of Embodied Reasoning in Vision-Language-Action Models

Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models report impressive success rates on standard robotic benchmarks, fueling optimism about general-purpose physical intelligence. However, recent evidence suggests a systematic misalignment between standard benchmark success and true embodied reasoning, raising the question of whether these high scores reflect genuine cognitive capability. To address this gap, we introduce BeTTER, a diagnostic Benchmark for Testing True Embodied Reasoning in robotic policies. BeTTER applies targeted causal interventions (e.g., spatial layout shifts, temporal extrapolation) while enforcing kinematic isolation to explicitly decouple high-level reasoning failures from low-level execution limits. Through systematic evaluation, we reveal that state-of-the-art VLAs catastrophically fail in dynamic scenarios, exhibiting severe lexical-kinematic shortcuts, behavioral inertia, and semantic feature collapse. Crucially, our mechanistic analysis traces these symptoms to fundamental architectural bottlenecks - such as capacity compression and myopic downsampling - which systematically degrade the model's foundational semantic representation. We demonstrate that highly static evaluation protocols effectively mask this degradation by allowing optimization to overfit to sensorimotor priors. Supported by real-world robotic validation, our findings confirm that this representational breakdown is not a simulation artifact, highlighting the critical need for future VLA paradigms to resolve the structural tension between high-frequency control and high-level reasoning.

Haiweng Xu, Sipeng Zheng, Hao Luo +3

1Peking University · 3BeingBeyond · 2Tsinghua University

VLM EvaluationVLM ReasoningVision-Language-Action ModelsRobot Manipulation BenchmarksEmbodied AIShortcut Learning+2
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

Leveraging Vision-Language Models to Detect Attention in Educational Videos

Educational videos are a cornerstone of remote and blended learning. However, learners' fluctuating attention remains a significant barrier to effective information retention. Prior research has attempted to mitigate this by detecting and reacting to attention loss at runtime using eye tracking. Such detection has been based so far on classical machine learning classifiers trained on engineered features, such as summary statistics over learners' fixations and saccades. These methods have struggled to capture the complex, temporal nature of learner engagement, thus exhibiting moderate prediction performance. In this study, we aim to advance the detection of attention by shifting from standard engineered features to a multimodal foundation models. Using an educational eye-tracking dataset (N = 70), we investigate a novel methodology that utilizes a Vision-Language Model (VLM) to analyze video content directly with superimposed gaze data. This approach aims to leverage the semantic reasoning capabilities of foundation models to contextualize learner focus within the video stream. We evaluate the performance of this VLM-based approach using several prompting strategies with Gemini 3, but ultimately found that none of them could outperform statistical baselines. Our results provide new insights into the limitations of using VLMs for real-time educational diagnostics.

Gabriel Becquet, Sébastien Lallé, Vanda Luengo +1

LIP6, CNRS, SU · Sorbonne University, CNRS, LIP6 & PHENIX, F-75005 Paris, France · CNRS, LIP6, SU +2

VLM EvaluationEducational TechnologyEye TrackingVideo-Language Models
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

Spatiotemporal Sycophancy: Negation-Based Gaslighting in Video Large Language Models

Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in video understanding tasks, yet their robustness under conversational interaction remains largely underexplored. In this paper, we identify spatiotemporal sycophancy, a failure mode in which Vid-LLMs retract initially correct, visually grounded judgments and conform to misleading user feedback under negation-based gaslighting. Rather than merely changing their answers, the models often fabricate unsupported temporal or spatial explanations to justify incorrect revisions. To systematically investigate this phenomenon, we propose a negation-based gaslighting evaluation framework and introduce GasVideo-1000, a curated benchmark designed to probe spatiotemporal sycophancy with clear visual grounding and temporal reasoning requirements. We evaluate a broad range of state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary Vid-LLMs across diverse video understanding tasks. Extensive experiments reveal that vulnerability to negation-based gaslighting is pervasive and severe, even among models with strong baseline performance. While prompt-level grounding constraints can partially mitigate this behavior, they do not reliably prevent hallucinated justifications or belief reversal. Our results indicate that current Vid-LLMs lack robust mechanisms for maintaining grounded spatiotemporal beliefs under adversarial conversational feedback.

Ziyao Tang, Pengkun Jiao, Bin Zhu +3

Institute of Trustworthy Embodied AI, Fudan University · Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multimodal Embodied AI · Singapore Management University

VLM EvaluationVLM RobustnessVision-Language GroundingSycophancy in VLMs
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026

When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias

The reliability of VLM-as-a-Judge is critical for the automatic evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs). Despite recent progress, our analysis reveals that VLM-as-a-Judge often pays limited attention to the image when making decisions. Instead, they often blindly favor the more informative answer, even when they can recognize it conflicts with the image content. We call this problem informativeness bias, which significantly undermines judge reliability. To address it, we propose BIRCH (Balanced Informativeness and CoRrectness with a Truthful AnCHor), a judging paradigm that first corrects inconsistencies with the image content in candidate answers, and then compares the answers against this corrected version. This shifts the judge's focus from informativeness to image-grounded correctness. Experiments on multiple models and benchmarks show that BIRCH reduces informativeness bias by up to 17%, resulting in performance gains of up to 9.8%. Our work reveals an overlooked but fundamental flaw in current VLM-as-a-Judge systems and highlights the need for more principled designs.

Xiaohan Zou, Roshan Sridhar, Mohammadtaher Safarzadeh +1

The Pennsylvania State University · Oracle AI

VLM EvaluationVision-Language AlignmentVision-Language Model-as-a-Judge
AskPDF
Apr 19, 2026

Lost in Motion: Vision Language Models Fail the Dynamic Gauges Test

The digital transformation of industrial manufacturing increasingly relies on the ability of autonomous robots to interact with legacy infrastructure, particularly analog gauges. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have the potential to provide a general solution for gauge reading and have already shown good performance in instrument recognition. However, performing accurate, real-time gauge readings is a more complex task. This paper evaluates state-of-the-art models, including versions from the GPT-5 (5.4 Thinking and 5.3 Instant) and Gemini 3 (Pro and Flash) families, against a set of simple but realistic dynamic gauge reading scenarios. To facilitate this evaluation, we introduce a novel dataset comprising video sequences of three instruments of different gauge types: circular, linear, and Vernier, under diverse motion and speed profiles. Our findings indicate that the evaluated frontier VLMs, under our specific testing conditions, exhibit a limited ability to interpret needle trajectories and scale semantics, failing to provide the traceability and reliability needed for safety-critical monitoring. The results demonstrate that these models have not yet achieved the performance necessary to be classified as trustworthy synthetic instruments under existing IEEE and ISO standards.

Tairan Fu, Francisco Javier Santos-Martín, Javier Conde +2

VLM EvaluationIndustrial InspectionTemporal Video Understanding
AskPDF
Apr 19, 2026

When Text Hijacks Vision: Benchmarking and Mitigating Text Overlay-Induced Hallucination in Vision Language Models

Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have substantially enhanced their ability across multimodal video understanding benchmarks spanning temporal, action, object, and spatial understanding. However, we identify a critical yet overlooked issue: when embedded on-screen text contradicts the visual scene, existing VLMs systematically hallucinate, prioritizing overlay textual semantics over the actual visual content. We define this phenomenon as Text Overlay-Induced Hallucination (TOIH). In this work, we propose VisualTextTrap, the first comprehensive benchmark, including large-scale human-validated samples with specifically designed evaluation metrics. In particular, we construct VisualTextTrap from widely-used public datasets using a scalable hybrid pipeline of VLMs assisted text generation and rigorous manual verification. The benchmark features 6,057 samples annotated across 88 fine-grained attributes within four dimensions, with hallucination intensity quantified on a five-level scale (L1--L5) that reflects the semantic contradiction between overlay text and visual reality. Moreover, we propose Visual Text Hallucination Mitigation Mixture-of-Experts (VTHM-MoE), a novel Vision-Text Disentanglement framework that employs a dual-encoder architecture. Concretely, four dimension-specialized expert modules spanning Temporal, Action, Object, and Spatial reasoning are first pre-trained to identify and leverage cross-modal discrepancies between textual semantics and actual video content. We develop an Adaptive Token Routing Strategy to enable dynamic expert allocation, conferring robust resistance to TOIH while preserving performance on uncontaminated videos. Extensive experiments conducted on our VisualTextTrap benchmark verify the effectiveness of VTHM-MoE, outperforming state-of-the-art counterparts with diverse video question answering tasks.

Cui Yakun, Xingqun Qi, TianTian Geng +3

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Hong Kong, China · University of Birmingham

VLM EvaluationVLM HallucinationVideo QA
AskPDF
Apr 19, 2026

More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at photorealistic generation, yet often struggle to represent abstract meaning such as idiomatic interpretations of noun compounds. To study whether high visual fidelity interferes with idiomatic compositionality under visual abstraction, we introduce DIVA, a controlled benchmark that replaces high-fidelity visual detail with schematic iconicity by generating paired, sense-anchored visualizations for literal and idiomatic readings. We further propose Semantic Alignment Gap (ΔΔ), an architecture-agnostic metric that quantifies divergence between literal and idiomatic visual grounding. We additionally introduce a directional signed bias b(t)b(t) to separately measure the direction and strength of literal preference. Evaluating 8 recent VLMs, we reveal a consistent Literal Superiority Bias: model scale alone does not resolve literal preference, and increased visual fidelity is associated with weaker symbolic alignment, suggesting cognitive interference from hyper-realistic imagery. Our findings suggest that improving compositional understanding requires iconographic abstraction of visual input and anchoring interpretation and generation in intended meaning.

Wei He

IDSAI, University of Exeter Exeter, UK

VLM EvaluationFigurative Language UnderstandingVision-Language ModelsVLM InterpretabilityVision-Language Grounding
AskPDF
Apr 18, 2026

DO-Bench: An Attributable Benchmark for Diagnosing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

Object level hallucination remains a central reliability challenge for vision language models (VLMs), particularly in binary object existence verification. Existing benchmarks emphasize aggregate accuracy but rarely disentangle whether errors stem from perceptual limitations or from the influence of contextual textual priors, leaving underlying failure mechanisms ambiguous. We introduce DO-Bench, a controlled diagnostic benchmark that isolates these sources through structured multimodal interventions. Rather than evaluating models in unconstrained settings, DO-Bench probes two complementary dimensions: the Prior Override dimension progressively strengthens contextual textual priors while holding visual evidence constant to assess resistance to prior pressure, and the Perception-Limited dimension incrementally enhances visual evidence from full-scene context to localized object crops to measure perceptual grounding strength. This paired design enables attribution of errors to prior suppression, perceptual insufficiency, or their interaction. We further define two diagnostic metrics, PriorRobust and PerceptionAbility, to quantify these behaviors consistently. Evaluations across diverse open- and closed-source VLMs reveal systematic differences in prior sensitivity and perceptual reliability, demonstrating that object hallucination reflects heterogeneous, mechanism dependent failure patterns beyond aggregate accuracy.

JiYang Wang, Jiawei Chen, Mengqi Xiao +3

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University · Zhongguancun Academy

VLM EvaluationHallucination Detection in VLMsVision-Language ModelsObject Hallucination in VLMsVision-Language Grounding
AskPDF
Apr 17, 2026

Where Do Vision-Language Models Fail? World Scale Analysis for Image Geolocalization

Image geolocalization has traditionally been addressed through retrieval-based place recognition or geometry-based visual localization pipelines. Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong zero-shot reasoning capabilities across multimodal tasks, yet their performance in geographic inference remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of multiple state-of-the-art VLMs for country-level image geolocalization using ground-view imagery only. Instead of relying on image matching, GPS metadata, or task-specific training, we evaluate prompt-based country prediction in a zero-shot setting. The selected models are tested on three geographically diverse datasets to assess their robustness and generalization ability. Our results reveal substantial variation across models, highlighting the potential of semantic reasoning for coarse geolocalization and the limitations of current VLMs in capturing fine-grained geographic cues. This study provides the first focused comparison of modern VLMs for country-level geolocalization and establishes a foundation for future research at the intersection of multimodal reasoning and geographic understanding.

Siddhant Bharadwaj, Ashish Vashist, Fahimul Aleem +1

University of Central Florida

VLM EvaluationLarge Vision-Language ModelsGeospatial ReasoningVLM Reasoning
AskPDF
Apr 17, 2026

HyperGVL: Benchmarking and Improving Large Vision-Language Models in Hypergraph Understanding and Reasoning

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) consistently require new arenas to guide their expanding boundaries, yet their capabilities with hypergraphs remain unexplored. In the real world, hypergraphs have significant practical applications in areas such as life sciences and social communities. Recent advancements in LVLMs have shown promise in understanding complex topologies, yet there remains a lack of a benchmark to delineate the capabilities of LVLMs with hypergraphs, leaving the boundaries of their abilities unclear. To fill this gap, in this paper, we introduce HyperGVL\texttt{HyperGVL}, the first benchmark to evaluate the proficiency of LVLMs in hypergraph understanding and reasoning. HyperGVL\texttt{HyperGVL} provides a comprehensive assessment of 12 advanced LVLMs across 84,000 vision-language question-answering (QA) samples spanning 12 tasks, ranging from basic component counting to complex NP-hard problem reasoning. The involved hypergraphs contain multiscale synthetic structures and real-world citation and protein networks. Moreover, we examine the effects of 12 textual and visual hypergraph representations and introduce a generalizable router WiseHyGR\texttt{WiseHyGR} that improves LVLMs in hypergraph via learning adaptive representations. We believe that this work is a step forward in connecting hypergraphs with LVLMs.

Yanbin Wei, Chun Kang, Siwei Li +11

1Southern University of Science and Technology · 2Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · 4Beihang University +1

VLM EvaluationLarge Vision-Language ModelsVLM ReasoningHypergraph Learning
AskPDF
Apr 16, 2026

Why Do Vision Language Models Struggle To Recognize Human Emotions?

Understanding emotions is a fundamental ability for intelligent systems to be able to interact with humans. Vision-language models (VLMs) have made tremendous progress in the last few years for many visual tasks, potentially offering a promising solution for understanding emotions. However, it is surprising that even the most sophisticated contemporary VLMs struggle to recognize human emotions or to outperform even specialized vision-only classifiers. In this paper we ask the question "Why do VLMs struggle to recognize human emotions?", and observe that the inherently continuous and dynamic task of facial expression recognition (DFER) exposes two critical VLM vulnerabilities. First, emotion datasets are naturally long-tailed, and the web-scale data used to pre-train VLMs exacerbates this head-class bias, causing them to systematically collapse rare, under-represented emotions into common categories. We propose alternative sampling strategies that prevent favoring common concepts. Second, temporal information is critical for understanding emotions. However, VLMs are unable to represent temporal information over dense frame sequences, as they are limited by context size and the number of tokens that can fit in memory, which poses a clear challenge for emotion recognition. We demonstrate that the sparse temporal sampling strategy used in VLMs is inherently misaligned with the fleeting nature of micro-expressions (0.25-0.5 seconds), which are often the most critical affective signal. As a diagnostic probe, we propose a multi-stage context enrichment strategy that utilizes the information from "in-between" frames by first converting them into natural language summaries. This enriched textual context is provided as input to the VLM alongside sparse keyframes, preventing attentional dilution from excessive visual data while preserving the emotional trajectory.

Madhav Agarwal, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Laura Sevilla-Lara +1

The University of Edinburgh, UK

VLM EvaluationMultimodal Emotion RecognitionFacial Expression Recognition
AskPDF
Apr 16, 2026

MetaDent: Labeling Clinical Images for Vision-Language Models in Dentistry

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in medical image analysis, yet their application in intraoral photography remains largely underexplored due to the lack of fine-grained, annotated datasets and comprehensive benchmarks. To address this, we present MetaDent, a comprehensive resource that includes (1) a novel and large-scale dentistry image dataset collected from clinical, public, and web sources; (2) a semi-structured annotation framework designed to capture the hierarchical and clinically nuanced nature of dental photography; and (3) comprehensive benchmark suites for evaluating state-of-the-art VLMs on clinical image understanding. Our labeling approach combines a high-level image summary with point-by-point, free-text descriptions of abnormalities. This method enables rich, scalable, and task-agnostic representations. We curated 60,669 dental images from diverse sources and annotated a representative subset of 2,588 images using this meta-labeling scheme. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs), we derive standardized benchmarks: approximately 15K Visual Question Answering (VQA) pairs and an 18-class multi-label classification dataset, which we validated with human review and error analysis to justify that the LLM-driven transition reliably preserves fidelity and semantic accuracy. We then evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs across VQA, classification, and image captioning tasks. Quantitative results reveal that even the most advanced models struggle with a fine-grained understanding of intraoral scenes, achieving moderate accuracy and producing inconsistent or incomplete descriptions in image captioning. We publicly release our dataset, annotations, and tools to foster reproducible research and accelerate the development of vision-language systems for dental applications.

Meng-Xun Li, Wen-Hui Deng, Zhi-Xing Wu +6

Department of Prosthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China · School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China +2

VLM EvaluationMedical Image AnalysisLLM-Assisted AnnotationMedical VQAMedical Image BenchmarksDental Imaging
AskPDF
Apr 15, 2026

Zoom Consistency: A Free Confidence Signal in Multi-Step Visual Grounding Pipelines

Multi-step zoom-in pipelines are widely used for GUI grounding, yet the intermediate predictions they produce are typically discarded after coordinate remapping. We observe that these intermediate outputs contain a useful confidence signal for free: zoom consistency, the distance between a model's step-2 prediction and the crop center. Unlike log-probabilities or token-level uncertainty, zoom consistency is a geometric quantity in a shared coordinate space, making it directly comparable across architecturally different VLMs without calibration. We prove this quantity is a linear estimator of step-1 spatial error under idealized conditions (perfect step-2, target within crop) and show it correlates with prediction correctness across two VLMs (AUC = 0.60; Spearman rho = -0.14, p < 10^{-6} for KV-Ground-8B; rho = -0.11, p = 0.0003 for Qwen3.5-27B). The correlation is small but consistent across models, application categories, and operating systems. As a proof-of-concept, we use zoom consistency to route between a specialist and generalist model, capturing 16.5% of the oracle headroom between them (+0.8%, McNemar p = 0.19). Code is available at https://github.com/omxyz/zoom-consistency-routing.

Keon Kim, Krish Chelikavada

Om Labs

Confidence Estimation for VLMsVision-Language GroundingGUI GroundingVLM Evaluation
AskPDF
Apr 15, 2026

FoodSense: A Multisensory Food Dataset and Benchmark for Predicting Taste, Smell, Texture, and Sound from Images

Humans routinely infer taste, smell, texture, and even sound from food images a phenomenon well studied in cognitive science. However, prior vision language research on food has focused primarily on recognition tasks such as meal identification, ingredient detection, and nutrition estimation. Image-based prediction of multisensory experience remains largely unexplored. We introduce FoodSense, a human-annotated dataset for cross-sensory inference containing 66,842 participant-image pairs across 2,987 unique food images. Each pair includes numeric ratings (1-5) and free-text descriptors for four sensory dimensions: taste, smell, texture, and sound. To enable models to both predict and explain sensory expectations, we expand short human annotations into image-grounded reasoning traces. A large language model generates visual justifications conditioned on the image, ratings, and descriptors. Using these annotations, we train FoodSense-VL, a vision language benchmark model to produce both multisensory ratings and grounded explanations directly from food images. This work connects cognitive science findings on cross-sensory perception with modern instruction tuning for multimodal models and shows that many popular evaluation metrics are insufficient for visually sensory inference.

Sabab Ishraq, Aarushi Aarushi, Juncai Jiang +1

College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA · College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA · Institute of Artificial Intelligence, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

VLM Evaluation
AskPDF
Apr 15, 2026

GUI-Perturbed: Domain Randomization Reveals Systematic Brittleness in GUI Grounding Models

GUI grounding models report over 85% accuracy on standard benchmarks, yet drop 27-56 percentage points when instructions require spatial reasoning rather than direct element naming. Current benchmarks miss this because they evaluate each screenshot once with a single fixed instruction. We introduce GUI-Perturbed, a controlled perturbation framework that independently varies visual scenes and instructions to measure grounding robustness. Evaluating three 7B models from the same architecture lineage, we find that relational instructions cause systematic accuracy collapse across all models, a 70% browser zoom produces statistically significant degradation, and rank-8 LoRA fine-tuning with augmented data degrades performance rather than improving it. By perturbing along independent axes, GUI-Perturbed isolates which specific capability axes are affected-spatial reasoning, visual robustness, reasoning calibration-providing diagnostic signal that aggregate benchmarks cannot. We release the dataset, augmentation pipeline, and a fine-tuned model.

Yangyue Wang, Harshvardhan Sikka, Yash Mathur +3

1Fig · 2Manifold Research

VLM EvaluationDomain RandomizationVisual Spatial ReasoningGUI GroundingVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Apr 15, 2026

Seek-and-Solve: Benchmarking MLLMs for Visual Clue-Driven Reasoning in Daily Scenarios

Daily scenarios are characterized by visual richness, requiring Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to filter noise and identify decisive visual clues for accurate reasoning. Yet, current benchmarks predominantly aim at evaluating MLLMs' pre-existing knowledge or perceptual understanding, often neglecting the critical capability of reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyClue, a benchmark designed for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios. Our construction is guided by two core principles: (1) strict grounding in authentic daily activities, and (2) challenging query design that necessitates more than surface-level perception. Instead of simple recognition, our questions compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues and leverage them for subsequent reasoning. To this end, we curate a comprehensive dataset spanning four major daily domains and 16 distinct subtasks. Comprehensive evaluation across MLLMs and agentic models underscores the formidable challenge posed by our benchmark. Our analysis reveals several critical insights, emphasizing that the accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust reasoning.

Xiaomin Li, Tala Wang, Zichen Zhong +7

Dalian University of Technology · WeChat, Tencent Inc. · Tsinghua University

VLM EvaluationMultimodal ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Apr 14, 2026

SceneCritic: A Symbolic Evaluator for 3D Indoor Scene Synthesis

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly generate indoor scenes through intermediate structures such as layouts and scene graphs, yet evaluation still relies on LLM or VLM judges that score rendered views, making judgments sensitive to viewpoint, prompt phrasing, and hallucination. When the evaluator is unstable, it becomes difficult to determine whether a model has produced a spatially plausible scene or whether the output score reflects the choice of viewpoint, rendering, or prompt. We introduce SceneCritic, a symbolic evaluator for floor-plan-level layouts. SceneCritic's constraints are grounded in SceneOnto, a structured spatial ontology we construct by aggregating indoor scene priors from 3D-FRONT, ScanNet, and Visual Genome. SceneOnto traverses this ontology to jointly verify semantic, orientation, and geometric coherence across object relationships, providing object-level and relationship-level assessments that identify specific violations and successful placements. Furthermore, we pair SceneCritic with an iterative refinement test bed that probes how models build and revise spatial structure under different critic modalities: a rule-based critic using collision constraints as feedback, an LLM critic operating on the layout as text, and a VLM critic operating on rendered observations. Through extensive experiments, we show that (a) SceneCritic aligns substantially better with human judgments than VLM-based evaluators, (b) text-only LLMs can outperform VLMs on semantic layout quality, and (c) image-based VLM refinement is the most effective critic modality for semantic and orientation correction.

Kathakoli Sengupta, Kai Ao, Paola Cascante-Bonilla

Stony Brook University

3D Scene Generation3D Scene Layout GenerationVLM Evaluation
AskPDF
Apr 14, 2026

Do VLMs Truly "Read" Candlesticks? A Multi-Scale Benchmark for Visual Stock Price Forecasting

Vision-language models(VLMs) are increasingly applied to visual stock price forecasting, yet existing benchmarks inadequately evaluate their understanding of stock price in candlestick charts. First, prior studies fail to isolate VLMs' comprehension of visual inputs genuinely improves predictive performance and whether VLMs truly comprehend candlestick patterns. Further, most existing datasets and evaluation setups are designed around single-period or tabular inputs. However, human analysts strongly rely on multi-scale candlestick charts, where longer-term horizons capture trend direction and shorter-term horizons provide cues for inflection points, making it difficult to systematically assess VLMs' ability to integrate short-term and long-term visual market dynamics. To bridge this gap, we construct a multi-scale candlestick charts dataset and a standardized evaluation framework to assess VLMs' ability to utilize multi-scale visual market signals. Evaluation combines confusion-matrix-based diagnostics with information coefficient(IC) time series metrics and includes XGBoost as a feature-based temporal baseline. Using this dataset, we benchmark representative VLMs and analyze their ability to leverage multi-scale stock price data. Experimental results show that most VLMs perform well only under persistent uptrend or downtrend conditions, while exhibiting weak predictive capability in more common market scenarios. We also identify significant prediction biases and limited sensitivity to explicitly specified forecast horizons in prompts, indicating inherent limitations in precise temporal reasoning.

Kaiqi Hu, Linda Xiao, Shiyue Xu +2

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK · Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China · Sun Yat-sen University, GuangZhou, China +1

Stock Price ForecastingFinancial ForecastingVLM EvaluationForecasting BenchmarksChart Understanding
AskPDF
Apr 14, 2026

Every Picture Tells a Dangerous Story: Memory-Augmented Multi-Agent Jailbreak Attacks on VLMs

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) expand the attack surface of safety-aligned systems by coupling visual perception with text generation. Existing multimodal jailbreak attacks primarily rely on crafted visual content, adversarial perturbations, or image-specific attack strategies, leaving the potential of reusable visual anchors in benign natural images largely unexplored. To address the problem, we introduce MemJack, a memory-augmented multi-agent framework for automated VLM red-teaming with natural images. MemJack combines visual-anchor discovery, visual-semantic camouflage, response evaluation, reflection-guided repair, and dynamic replanning within a closed-loop attack pipeline. Beyond attack generation, MemJack automatically transforms public images into attack anchors, enables the construction of MemJack-Bench, a dataset of over 113,000 interactive multimodal jailbreak trajectories for safety evaluation and defensive alignment. Extensive empirical evaluations across full, unmodified COCO val2017 images demonstrate that MemJack achieves a 71.48% attack success rate (ASR) against Qwen3-VL-Plus, scaling to 90% under extended budgets. Compared with representative multimodal jailbreak baselines under the same natural-image evaluation setting, MemJack achieves the highest ASR while requiring fewer mean rounds to success, demonstrating superior jailbreak effectiveness on VLMs. These results demonstrate that benign natural images can act as transferable jailbreak anchors and reveal substantial vulnerabilities in current safety-aligned VLMs.

Jianhao Chen, Shiqin Wang, Haoyang Chen +4

School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China · Zhongguancun Academy, Beijing, China · Tianjin University, Tianjin, China +1

Adversarial Attacks on VLMsVLM EvaluationMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF