AI Agent Benchmarks

Ask about this topic

Overview

AI agent benchmarks test systems that act over multiple steps, use tools, and respond to changing information, rather than only answer isolated questions. Researchers build executable environments for settings such as web search, coding, graphical interfaces, games, scientific workflows, and multi-agent coordination, then score outcomes with programmatic checks, expert rubrics, or simulated users. Increasingly, evaluations also inspect trajectories, evidence use, efficiency, safety, and recovery from errors. Agents can perform well on narrow tasks yet remain unreliable on long-horizon work, and results often depend strongly on the model, harness, environment, and grading method.

Latest papers

CardsList

1,503 papers271 papers in the last four weeks, up 91% on the four weeks before. 1.6% of all new papers.

Mar 17, 2026

When the Specification Emerges: Benchmarking Faithfulness Loss in Long-Horizon Coding Agents

Current coding-agent benchmarks usually pro- vide the full task specification upfront. Real research coding often does not: the intended system is progressively disclosed through in- teraction, requiring the agent to track durable design commitments across a long session. We introduce a benchmark for this setting and study faithfulne Ss Loss U nder eM ergent s Pecification (SLUMP), defined as the reduc- tion in final implementation faithfulness un- der emergent specification relative to a single- shot specification control. The benchmark con- tains 20 recent ML papers (10 ICML 2025, 10 NeurIPS 2025), 371 atomic verifiable compo- nents, and interaction scripts of approximately 60 coding requests that progressively disclose the target design without revealing the paper itself. Final repositories are scored with a five-level component-faithfulness rubric and accompanied by an exposure audit to verify that scored components are recoverable from the visible interaction. Evaluated on Claude Code and Codex, the single-shot specification control achieves higher overall implementation fidelity on 16/20 and 14/20 papers, respectively. Structural integration degrades under emergent specification on both platforms, while seman- tic faithfulness loss is substantial on Claude Code and small on Codex. As a mitigation case study, we introduce ProjectGuard, an exter- nal project-state layer for specification tracking. On Claude Code, ProjectGuard recovers 90% of the faithfulness gap, increases fully faith- ful components from 118 to 181, and reduces severe failures from 72 to 49. These results identify specification tracking as a distinct eval- uation target for long-horizon coding agents.

Lu Yan, Xuan Chen, Xiangyu Zhang

Purdue University

AI Coding AgentsCoding AgentsLong-Horizon Agent EvaluationAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 17, 2026

RetailBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Autonomous Decision-Making and Strategy Stability of LLM Agents in Realistic Retail Environments

Large language model (LLM) agents have made rapid progress on short-horizon, well-scoped tasks, yet their ability to sustain coherent decisions in dynamic long-horizon environments remains uncertain. We introduce RetailBench, a data-grounded simulation benchmark for evaluating tool-using LLM agents in single-store supermarket operation. RetailBench models retail management as a partially observable decision process and is designed to support thousand-day-scale simulations. In this environment, agents must manage pricing, replenishment, supplier selection, shelf assortment, inventory aging, customer feedback, external events, and cash-flow constraints. We evaluate seven contemporary LLMs under representative agent frameworks over a 180-day evaluation horizon and compare them with a privileged oracle policy. Results show substantial variation across models: only a small subset survives the full evaluation horizon, and even the strongest LLM runs remain substantially behind the oracle policy in final net worth and sales outcomes. Behavioral analysis attributes these gaps to incomplete evidence acquisition, surface-level decision making, and the lack of a consistent long-horizon policy. RetailBench provides a controlled testbed for studying reliable autonomy in economically grounded long-horizon decision-making.

Linghua Zhang, Jun Wang, Jingtong Wu +1

Ant Group · City University of Hong Kong

Long-Horizon Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Decision-MakingLLM Agent Reliability
AskPDF
Mar 17, 2026

VisBrowse-Bench: Benchmarking Visual-Native Search for Multimodal Browsing Agents

The rapid advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has enabled browsing agents to acquire and reason over multimodal information in the real world. But existing benchmarks suffer from two limitations: insufficient evaluation of visual reasoning ability and the neglect of native visual information of web pages in the reasoning chains. To address these challenges, we introduce a new benchmark for visual-native search, VisBrowse-Bench. It contains 169 VQA instances covering multiple domains and evaluates the models' visual reasoning capabilities during the search process through multimodal evidence cross-validation via text-image retrieval and joint reasoning. These data were constructed by human experts using a multi-stage pipeline and underwent rigorous manual verification. We additionally propose an agent workflow that can effectively drive the browsing agent to actively collect and reason over visual information during the search process. We comprehensively evaluated both open-source and closed-source models in this workflow. Experimental results show that even the best-performing model, Claude-4.6-Opus only achieves an accuracy of 47.6%, while the proprietary Deep Research model, o3-deep-research only achieves an accuracy of 41.1%. The code and data can be accessed at: https://github.com/ZhengboZhang/VisBrowse-Bench

Zhengbo Zhang, Jinbo Su, Zhaowen Zhou +14

CASIA · Ant Digital Technologies, Ant Group · RUC +4

Multimodal Search AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksMultimodal ReasoningMultimodal IR
AskPDF
Mar 17, 2026

SWE-QA-Pro: A Representative Benchmark and Scalable Training Recipe for Repository-Level Code Understanding

Agentic repository-level code understanding is essential for automating complex software engineering tasks, yet the field lacks reliable benchmarks. Existing evaluations often overlook the long tail topics and rely on popular repositories where Large Language Models (LLMs) can cheat via memorized knowledge. To address this, we introduce SWE-QA-Pro, a benchmark constructed from diverse, long-tail repositories with executable environments. We enforce topical balance via issue-driven clustering to cover under-represented task types and apply a rigorous difficulty calibration process: questions solvable by direct-answer baselines are filtered out. This results in a dataset where agentic workflows significantly outperform direct answering (e.g., a ~13-point gap for Claude Sonnet 4.5), confirming the necessity of agentic codebase exploration. Furthermore, to tackle the scarcity of training data for such complex behaviors, we propose a scalable synthetic data pipeline that powers a two-stage training recipe: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF). This approach allows small open models to learn efficient tool usage and reasoning. Empirically, a Qwen3-8B model trained with our recipe surpasses GPT-4o by 2.3 points on SWE-QA-Pro and substantially narrows the gap to state-of-the-art proprietary models, demonstrating both the validity of our evaluation and the effectiveness of our agentic training workflow.

Songcheng Cai, Zhiheng Lyu, Yuansheng Ni +13

University of Waterloo · University of Toronto · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology +2

AI Agent BenchmarksSoftware Engineering BenchmarksSoftware EngineeringLLM Agent TrainingRL for LLM Agents
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

FormulaCode: Evaluating Agentic Optimization on Large Codebases

Large language model (LLM) coding agents increasingly operate at the repository level, motivating benchmarks that evaluate their ability to optimize entire codebases under realistic constraints. Existing code benchmarks largely rely on synthetic tasks, binary correctness signals, or single-objective evaluation, limiting their ability to assess holistic optimization behavior. We introduce FormulaCode, a benchmark for evaluating agentic optimization on large, real-world codebases with fine-grained, multi-objective performance metrics. FormulaCode comprises 957 performance bottlenecks mined from scientific Python repositories on GitHub, each paired with expert-authored patches and, on average, 264.6 community-maintained performance workloads per task, enabling the holistic ability of LLM agents to optimize codebases under realistic correctness and performance constraints. Our evaluations reveal that repository-scale, multi-objective optimization remains a major challenge for frontier LLM agents. Project website at: https://formula-code.github.io

Atharva Sehgal, James Hou, Akanksha Sarkar +4

The University of Texas at Austin · California Institute of Technology · Cornell University

Coding Agent BenchmarksCode OptimizationAI Agent BenchmarksLarge Language Model-Guided Optimization
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

AsgardBench -- Evaluating Visually Grounded Interactive Planning Under Minimal Feedback

With AsgardBench we aim to evaluate visually grounded, high-level action sequence generation and interactive planning, focusing specifically on plan adaptation during execution based on visual observations rather than navigation or low-level manipulation. In the landscape of embodied AI benchmarks, AsgardBench targets the capability category of interactive planning, which is more sophisticated than offline high-level planning as it requires agents to revise plans in response to environmental feedback, yet remains distinct from low-level execution. Unlike prior embodied AI benchmarks that conflate reasoning with navigation or provide rich corrective feedback that substitutes for perception, AsgardBench restricts agent input to images, action history, and lightweight success/failure signals, isolating interactive planning in a controlled simulator without low-level control noise. The benchmark contains 108 task instances spanning 12 task types, each systematically varied through object state, placement, and scene configuration. These controlled variations create conditional branches in which a single instruction can require different action sequences depending on what the agent observes, emphasizing conditional branching and plan repair during execution. Our evaluations of leading vision language models show that performance drops sharply without visual input, revealing weaknesses in visual grounding and state tracking that ultimately undermine interactive planning. Our benchmark zeroes in on a narrower question: can a model actually use what it sees to adapt a plan when things do not go as expected?

Andrea Tupini, Lars Liden, Reuben Tan +2

Microsoft Research

AI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent PlanningRobot Task PlanningVLMs for RoboticsVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

CUBE: A Standard for Unifying Agent Benchmarks

The proliferation of agent benchmarks has created critical fragmentation that threatens research productivity. Each new benchmark requires substantial custom integration, creating an "integration tax" that limits comprehensive evaluation. We propose CUBE (Common Unified Benchmark Environments), a universal protocol standard built on MCP and Gym that allows benchmarks to be wrapped once and used everywhere. By separating task, benchmark, package, and registry concerns into distinct API layers, CUBE enables any compliant platform to access any compliant benchmark for evaluation, RL training, or data generation without custom integration. We call on the community to contribute to the development of this standard before platform-specific implementations deepen fragmentation as benchmark production accelerates through 2026.

Alexandre Lacoste, Nicolas Gontier, Oleh Shliazhko +23

ServiceNow AI Research · Dalhousie · McGill +7

AI Agent BenchmarksAI Agent Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

The PokeAgent Challenge: Competitive and Long-Context Learning at Scale

We present the PokeAgent Challenge, a large-scale benchmark for decision-making research built on Pokemon's multi-agent battle system and expansive role-playing game (RPG) environment. Partial observability, game-theoretic reasoning, and long-horizon planning remain open problems for frontier AI, yet few benchmarks stress all three simultaneously under realistic conditions. PokeAgent targets these limitations at scale through two complementary tracks: our Battling Track, which calls for strategic reasoning and generalization under partial observability in competitive Pokemon battles, and our Speedrunning Track, which requires long-horizon planning and sequential decision-making in the Pokemon RPG. Our Battling Track supplies a dataset of 20M+ battle trajectories alongside a suite of heuristic, RL, and LLM-based baselines capable of high-level competitive play. Our Speedrunning Track provides the first standardized evaluation framework for RPG speedrunning, including an open-source multi-agent orchestration system for modular, reproducible comparisons of harness-based LLM approaches. Our NeurIPS 2025 competition validates both the quality of our resources and the research community's interest in Pokemon, with over 100 teams competing across both tracks and winning solutions detailed in our paper. Participant submissions and our baselines reveal considerable gaps between generalist (LLM), specialist (RL), and elite human performance. Analysis against the BenchPress evaluation matrix shows that Pokemon battling is nearly orthogonal to standard LLM benchmarks, measuring capabilities not captured by existing suites and positioning Pokemon as an unsolved benchmark that can drive RL and LLM research forward. We transition to a living benchmark with a live leaderboard for Battling and self-contained evaluation for Speedrunning at https://pokeagentchallenge.com.

Seth Karten, Jake Grigsby, Tersoo Upaa +28

Princeton · UT-Austin · Team Heatz +12

AI Agent BenchmarksGame-Playing AgentsLong-Horizon Agent Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

Benchmarking Real-Time Question Answering via Executable Code Workflows

Retrieving real-time information is a fundamental capability for search-integrated agents in real-world applications. However, existing benchmarks are predominantly static and therefore fail to capture the temporal dynamics of information and the continuously evolving nature of real-world knowledge. To address this limitation, we propose RT-QA, a dynamic evaluation framework that leverages executable code workflows to retrieve up-to-date answers at evaluation time. Specifically, we construct an agent-driven pipeline that autonomously generates code for web crawling and DOM-based answer extraction to produce real-time ground truth. To ensure robust evaluation over time, the pipeline further incorporates a self-repair mechanism to adapt to changes in web page structures. RT-QA spans 12 domains (e.g., Finance, Sports) with 320 Chinese questions categorized into three difficulty levels. Extensive evaluations of state-of-the-art models (e.g., GPT-5.2, GLM-4.7) reveal significant limitations in real-time adaptability: even the best models achieve only 46% accuracy. Our analysis highlights two primary failure modes: (1) Lazy Retrieval, where agents rely on search snippets instead of deeply scanning specific websites for information (20% of failures); and (2) Temporal Confusion, a cognitive error where agents retrieve a historical date (e.g., an event in 2024) and fail to re-anchor to the current time (2026) for subsequent reasoning. These findings suggest that future agents require not just better retrieval strategies, but robust temporal state management.

Wenjie Zhou, Yuan Gao, Xin Zhou +5

Li Auto Inc. · Minzu University of China

AI Agent BenchmarksTemporal IRTemporal Reasoning in Language Models
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

Talk, Evaluate, Diagnose: User-aware Agent Evaluation with Automated Error Analysis

Agent applications are increasingly adopted to automate workflows across diverse tasks. However, due to the heterogeneous domains they operate in, it is challenging to create a scalable evaluation framework. Prior works each employ their own methods to determine task success, such as database lookups, regex match, etc., adding complexity to the development of a unified agent evaluation approach. Moreover, they do not systematically account for the user's role nor expertise in the interaction, providing incomplete insights into the agent's performance. We argue that effective agent evaluation goes beyond correctness alone, incorporating conversation quality, efficiency and systematic diagnosis of agent errors. To address this, we introduce the TED framework (Talk, Evaluate, Diagnose). (1) Talk: We leverage reusable, generic expert and non-expert user persona templates for user-agent interaction. (2) Evaluate: We adapt existing datasets by representing subgoals-such as tool signatures, and responses-as natural language grading notes, evaluated automatically with LLM-as-a-judge. We propose new metrics that capture both turn efficiency and intermediate progress of the agent complementing the user-aware setup. (3) Diagnose: We introduce an automated error analysis tool that analyzes the inconsistencies of the judge and agents, uncovering common errors, and providing actionable feedback for agent improvement. We show that our TED framework reveals new insights regarding agent performance across models and user expertise levels. We also demonstrate potential gains in agent performance with peaks of 8-10% on our proposed metrics after incorporating the identified error remedies into the agent's design.

Penny Chong, Harshavardhan Abichandani, Jiyuan Shen +4

SAP · Stanford University

LLM Agent EvaluationAgent EvaluationAutomated Agent EvaluationAutomated EvaluationAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

Gym-V: A Unified Vision Environment System for Agentic Vision Research

As agentic systems increasingly rely on reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards, standardized ``gym'' infrastructure has become essential for rapid iteration, reproducibility, and fair comparison. Vision agents lack such infrastructure, limiting systematic study of what drives their learning and where current models fall short. We introduce Gym-V, a unified platform of 179 procedurally generated visual environments across 10 domains with controllable difficulty, enabling controlled experiments that were previously infeasible across fragmented toolkits. Using it, we find that observation scaffolding is more decisive for training success than the choice of RL algorithm, with captions and game rules determining whether learning succeeds at all. Cross-domain transfer experiments further show that training on diverse task categories generalizes broadly while narrow training can cause negative transfer, with multi-turn interaction amplifying all of these effects. Gym-V is released as a convenient foundation for training environments and evaluation toolkits, aiming to accelerate future research on agentic VLMs.

Fanqing Meng, Lingxiao Du, Jiawei Gu +9

National University of Singapore. · University of Washington. · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. +1

AI Agent BenchmarksRL for VLMsAgentic RLCross-Domain Generalization
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints

Solving problems through tool use under explicit constraints constitutes a highly challenging yet unavoidable scenario for large language models (LLMs), requiring capabilities such as function calling, instruction following, and self-refinement. However, progress has been hindered by the absence of dedicated evaluations. To address this, we introduce CCTU, a benchmark for evaluating LLM tool use under complex constraints. CCTU is grounded in a taxonomy of 12 constraint categories spanning four dimensions (i.e., resource, behavior, toolset, and response). The benchmark comprises 200 carefully curated and challenging test cases across diverse tool-use scenarios, each involving an average of seven constraint types and an average prompt length exceeding 4,700 tokens. To enable reliable evaluation, we develop an executable constraint validation module that performs step-level validation and enforces compliance during multi-turn interactions between models and their environments. We evaluate nine state-of-the-art LLMs in both thinking and non-thinking modes. Results indicate that when strict adherence to all constraints is required, no model achieves a task completion rate above 20%. Further analysis reveals that models violate constraints in over 50% of cases, particularly in the resource and response dimensions. Moreover, LLMs demonstrate limited capacity for self-refinement even after receiving detailed feedback on constraint violations, highlighting a critical bottleneck in the development of robust tool-use agents. To facilitate future research, we release the data and code.

Junjie Ye, Guoqiang Zhang, Wenjie Fu +4

College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University

Tool-Use EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Tool UseLLM Agents
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

GUI-CEval: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents

Recent progress in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has enabled mobile GUI agents capable of visual perception, cross-modal reasoning, and interactive control. However, existing benchmarks are largely English-centric and fail to capture the linguistic and interaction characteristics of the Chinese mobile ecosystem. They also focus on isolated skills such as GUI grounding or offline agent, lacking a unified and fine-grained framework to assess the full capability chain from perception to execution. To address this gap, we introduce GUI-CEval, the first comprehensive benchmark for Chinese mobile GUI agents, built entirely on physical device environments. GUI-CEval spans 201 mainstream apps across four device types and adopts a two-level structure that evaluates both atomic abilities and realistic application-level performance along five dimensions: perception, planning, reflection, execution, and evaluation. All data are collected and verified through multi-stage manual processes to ensure authenticity and reproducibility. Extensive experiments on 20 representative MLLMs and multi-agent systems show that while models such as Qwen2.5-VL and UI-TARS perform competitively, most MLLMs still exhibit clear weaknesses in reflective decision-making and post-action self-evaluation, limiting their reliability in real-world interactions. We hope GUI-CEval provides a comprehensive and interpretable benchmark to guide capability diagnosis and advance the development of Chinese mobile GUI agents.

Yang Li, Yuchen Liu, Haoyu Lu +8

HyperAI Team, Xiaomi Corporation

Computer-Use Agent BenchmarksGUI AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksMobile GUI Agents
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

VTC-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Multimodal Models via Compositional Visual Tool Chaining

Recent advancements extend Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) beyond standard visual question answering to utilizing external tools for advanced visual tasks. Despite this progress, precisely executing and effectively composing diverse tools for complex tasks remain persistent bottleneck. Constrained by sparse tool-sets and simple tool-use trajectories, existing benchmarks fail to capture complex and diverse tool interactions, falling short in evaluating model performance under practical, real-world conditions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VisualToolChain-Bench(VTC-Bench), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate tool-use proficiency in MLLMs. To align with realistic computer vision pipelines, our framework features 32 diverse OpenCV-based visual operations. This rich tool-set enables extensive combinations, allowing VTC-Bench to rigorously assess multi-tool composition and long-horizon, multi-step plan execution. For precise evaluation, we provide 680 curated problems structured across a nine-category cognitive hierarchy, each with ground-truth execution trajectories. Extensive experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal critical limitations in current models' visual agentic capabilities. Specifically, models struggle to adapt to diverse tool-sets and generalize to unseen operations, with the leading model Gemini-3.0-Pro only achieving 51% on our benchmark. Furthermore, multi-tool composition remains a persistent challenge. When facing complex tasks, models struggle to formulate efficient execution plans, relying heavily on a narrow, suboptimal subset of familiar functions rather than selecting the optimal tools. By identifying these fundamental challenges, VTC-Bench establishes a rigorous baseline to guide the development of more generalized visual agentic models.

Xuanyu Zhu, Yuhao Dong, Rundong Wang +9

PKU · Meituan · NTU +4

Compositional Reasoning in VLMsTool Use in VLMsAI Agent BenchmarksMultimodal Tool UseVLM Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

TelcoAgent-Bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Telecom AI Agents

The integration of large language model (LLM) agents into telecom networks introduces new challenges, related to intent recognition, tool execution, and resolution generation, while taking into consideration different operational constraints. In this paper, we introduce TelcoAgent-Bench and TelcoAgent-Metrics, a Telecom-specific benchmarking framework for evaluating multilingual telecom LLM agents. The proposed framework assesses the semantic understanding as well as process-level alignment with structured troubleshooting flows and stability across repeated scenario variations. Our contribution includes a structured suite of metrics that assess intent recognition, ordered tool execution, resolution correctness, and stability across scenario variations, with the aim of quantifying the reliability and operational consistency of LLM agents in telecom environments. The framework is designed to operate in both English and Arabic, to address the need for multilingual agent deployment in operational network environments. Our experimental results show that although recent instruct-tuned models can understand telecom problems in a reasonable way, they usually struggle to consistently follow the required troubleshooting steps and to maintain stable behavior when exposed to different variations of the same scenario. This performance gap becomes more pronounced in unconstrained and bilingual settings.

Lina Bariah, Brahim Mefgouda, Farbod Tavakkoli +3

Research Institute for Digital Future, Khalifa University · AT&T CDO · GSMA

AI Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent ReliabilityMultilingual Language Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

Shopping Companion: Benchmarking and Training LLM Agents for Long-Horizon Preference-Grounded E-Commerce Tasks

In e-commerce, LLM agents show promise for shopping tasks such as recommendations, budget management, and bundle deals, where accurately capturing user preferences from long-horizon conversations is critical. However, progress is limited by two key challenges: (1) the absence of benchmarks for evaluating long-term preference-aware shopping tasks, and (2) the lack of fine-grained supervision for shopping agent training. To fill the benchmark gap, we introduce Shopping Companion Bench, a novel benchmark comprising two shopping tasks that require cross-session preference memory, grounded in a product pool of over 1.2 million real-world items. Our analysis further identifies two major sources of failure on this benchmark: cascading errors caused by preference hallucination, and insufficient verification of product attributes against user requirements. To address these failure modes, we design annotation-free, tool-wise rewards that provide process supervision for each tool call, alleviating reward sparsity in long-horizon tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models such as GPT-5 achieve success rates below 70%, highlighting the difficulty of our benchmark. Notably, our fine-tuned lightweight 4B model consistently outperforms strong baselines in both preference capture and task performance, suggesting the effectiveness of our reward design.

Zijian Yu, Kejun Xiao, Huaipeng Zhao +2

Alibaba International Digital Commercial Group

LLM Agent TrainingAI Agent BenchmarksLong-Horizon Agent EvaluationLarge Language Model-Based RecommendationMemory-Augmented Language Model Agents
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

OpenHospital: A Thing-in-itself Arena for Evolving and Benchmarking LLM-based Collective Intelligence

Large Language Model (LLM)-based Collective Intelligence (CI) presents a promising approach to overcoming the data wall and continuously boosting the capabilities of LLM agents. However, there is currently no dedicated arena for evolving and benchmarking LLM-based CI. To address this gap, we introduce OpenHospital, an interactive arena where physician agents can evolve CI through interactions with patient agents. This arena employs a data-in-agent-self paradigm that rapidly enhances agent capabilities and provides robust evaluation metrics for benchmarking both medical proficiency and system efficiency. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of OpenHospital in both fostering and quantifying CI.

Peigen Liu, Rui Ding, Yuren Mao +7

School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University · Laboratory for Statistical Monitoring and Intelligent Governance of Common Prosperity, Zhejiang Gongshang University · Tongyi Lab, Alibaba Group +1

LLM AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent Self-ImprovementLLM Agent Training
AskPDF
Mar 15, 2026

LongVidSearch: An Agentic Benchmark for Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval Planning in Long Videos

Long video question answering (Long-Video QA) increasingly relies on agentic tool use to retrieve evidence from long videos. In realistic settings, this process often requires multi-hop retrieval, where agents must iteratively gather multiple discontinuous evidence clips. However, existing long-video benchmarks are largely static: they rarely enforce strict multi-hop retrieval and typically lack a standardized evidence-access interface, making it difficult to separate failures in retrieval planning from those in answer generation. To address this gap, we introduce LongVidSearch, a benchmark for evaluating agentic multi-hop evidence retrieval planning in long videos under standardized access constraints. LongVidSearch enforces retrieval necessity: a Hop-k question requires exactly k necessary evidence clips, and removing any single clip renders the question unsolvable. The benchmark contains 3,000 questions over 447 long videos (average length 26 minutes), covering four reasoning categories: State Mutation, Causal Inference, Global Summary, and Visual Tracking, with 2-hop, 3-hop, and 4-hop evidence requirements. To ensure fair and controlled evaluation, all agents interact with LongVidSearch through a unified tool interface, which fixes the retrieval backend and isolates the agent's ability to formulate queries and plan iterative retrieval. In addition to answer accuracy, we measure tool-call cost to analyze the accuracy-efficiency trade-off under identical access conditions. We evaluate VideoAgent-style QA agents with multiple backbone LLMs using three-judge majority voting. GPT-5 achieves the highest accuracy (42.43), outperforming Gemini 3 Pro (30.97) and GPT-4o (19.20), yet remaining below 50 %, highlighting the difficulty of multi-hop retrieval planning. With gold evidence clips, performance becomes near-perfect, confirming retrieval planning as the primary bottleneck.

Rongyi Yu, Chenyuan Duan, Wentao Zhang

Peking University & Zhongguancun Academy Beijing, China

AI Agent BenchmarksMulti-Hop QALong-Video QAVideo Retrieval
AskPDF
Mar 14, 2026

ττ-Voice: Benchmarking Full-Duplex Voice Agents on Real-World Domains

Full-duplex voice agents--systems that listen and speak simultaneously--are rapidly moving from research to production. However, existing evaluations address conversational dynamics and task completion in isolation. We introduce ττ-voice, a benchmark for evaluating voice agents on grounded tasks with real-world complexity: agents must navigate complex multi-turn conversations, adhere to domain policies, and interact with the environment. The framework extends τ2τ^2-bench into a novel voice agent benchmark combining verifiable completion of complex grounded tasks, full-duplex interaction, and realistic audio--enabling direct comparison between voice and text performance. A controllable and realistic voice user simulator provides diverse accents, realistic audio environments, and rich turn-taking dynamics; by decoupling simulation from wall-clock time, the user simulator can use the most capable LLM without real-time constraints. We evaluate task completion (pass@1) and voice interaction quality across 278 tasks: while GPT-5 (reasoning) achieves 85%, voice agents reach only 31--51% under clean conditions and 26--38% under realistic conditions with noise and diverse accents--retaining only 30--45% of text capability; qualitative analysis confirms 79--90% of failures stem from agent behavior, suggesting that observed failures primarily reflect agent behavior under our evaluation setup. ττ-voice provides a reproducible testbed for measuring progress toward voice agents that are natural, conversational, and reliable.

Soham Ray, Keshav Dhandhania, Victor Barres +1

Sierra.ai, San Francisco, USA · Princeton Language and Intelligence, Princeton University

Voice Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksFull-Duplex Spoken Dialogue SystemsMulti-Turn Dialogue Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 13, 2026

EnterpriseOps-Gym: Environments and Evaluations for Stateful Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Enterprise Settings

Large language models are shifting from passive information providers to active agents intended for complex workflows. However, their deployment as reliable AI workers in enterprise is stalled by benchmarks that fail to capture the intricacies of professional environments, specifically, the need for long-horizon planning amidst persistent state changes and strict access protocols. In this work, we introduce EnterpriseOps-Gym, a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic planning in realistic enterprise settings. Specifically, EnterpriseOps-Gym features a containerized sandbox with 164 database tables and 512 functional tools to mimic real-world search friction. Within this environment, agents are evaluated on 1,150 expert-curated tasks across eight mission-critical verticals (including Customer Service, HR, and IT). Our evaluation of 14 frontier models reveals critical limitations in state-of-the-art models: the top-performing Claude Opus 4.5 achieves only 37.4% success. Further analysis shows that providing oracle human plans improves performance by 14-35 percentage points, pinpointing strategic reasoning as the primary bottleneck. Additionally, agents frequently fail to refuse infeasible tasks (best model achieves 53.9%), leading to unintended and potentially harmful side effects. Our findings underscore that current agents are not yet ready for autonomous enterprise deployment. More broadly, EnterpriseOps-Gym provides a concrete testbed to advance the robustness of agentic planning in professional workflows.

Shiva Krishna Reddy Malay, Shravan Nayak, Jishnu Sethumadhavan Nair +6

ServiceNow Research · Mila - Quebec AI Institute · Université de Montréal

AI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent PlanningLong-Horizon Agent EvaluationAI Agent Safety Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 12, 2026

Generating Expressive and Customizable Evals for Timeseries Data Analysis Agents with AgentFuel

Across many domains (e.g., IoT, observability, telecommunications, cybersecurity), there is an emerging adoption of conversational data analysis agents that enable users to "talk to your data" to extract insights. Such data analysis agents operate on timeseries data models; e.g., measurements from sensors or events monitoring user clicks and actions in product analytics. We evaluate 6 popular data analysis agents (both open-source and proprietary) on domain-specific data and query types, and find that they fail on stateful and incident-specific queries. We observe two key expressivity gaps in existing evals: domain-customized datasets and domain-specific query types. To enable practitioners in such domains to generate customized and expressive evals for such timeseries data agents, we present AgentFuel. AgentFuel helps domain experts quickly create customized evals to perform end-to-end functional tests. We show that AgentFuel's benchmarks expose key directions for improvement in existing data agent frameworks. We also present anecdotal evidence that using AgentFuel can improve agent performance (e.g., with GEPA). AgentFuel benchmarks are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/RockfishData/TimeSeriesAgentEvals.

Aadyaa Maddi, Prakhar Naval, Deepti Mande +3

Rockfish Data and Carnegie Mellon University

LLM Agent EvaluationData Analysis AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksAutomated Agent Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 12, 2026

Strategic Navigation or Stochastic Search? How Agents and Humans Reason Over Document Collections

Multimodal agents offer a promising path to automating complex document-intensive workflows. Yet, a critical question remains: do these agents demonstrate genuine strategic reasoning, or merely stochastic trial-and-error search? To address this, we introduce MADQA, a benchmark of 2,250 human-authored questions grounded in 800 heterogeneous PDF documents. Guided by Classical Test Theory, we design it to maximize discriminative power across varying levels of agentic abilities. To evaluate agentic behaviour, we introduce a novel evaluation protocol measuring the accuracy-effort trade-off. Using this framework, we show that while the best agents can match human searchers in raw accuracy, they succeed on largely different questions and rely on brute-force search to compensate for weak strategic planning. They fail to close the nearly 20% gap to oracle performance, persisting in unproductive loops. We release the dataset and evaluation harness to help facilitate the transition from brute-force retrieval to calibrated, efficient reasoning.

Łukasz Borchmann, Jordy Van Landeghem, Michał Turski +12

Multi-Document QALLM Agent EvaluationMultimodal Search AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksDocument QAIR Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 11, 2026

SimulCost: A Cost-Aware Benchmark and Toolkit for Automating Physics Simulations with LLMs

Evaluating LLM agents for scientific tasks has focused on token costs while ignoring tool-use costs like simulation time and experimental resources. As a result, metrics like pass@k become impractical under realistic budget constraints. To address this gap, we introduce SimulCost, the first benchmark targeting cost-sensitive parameter tuning in physics simulations. SimulCost compares LLM tuning cost-sensitive parameters against traditional scanning approach in both accuracy and computational cost, spanning 2,643 single-round (initial guess) and 2,304 multi-round (adjustment by trial-and-error) tasks across 11 simulators from fluid dynamics, solid mechanics, and plasma physics, whose costs are analytically defined and platform-independent. A twelfth simulator, a production plasma code measurable only by wall clock, is reported separately. Frontier LLMs achieve 45-62% success rates in single-round mode, dropping to 34-50% under high accuracy requirements, rendering their initial guesses unreliable especially for high accuracy tasks. Multi-round mode improves rates to 66-81%, but LLMs are 1.5-2.7x slower than traditional scanning, making them uneconomical choices. We also investigate parameter group correlations for knowledge transfer potential, and the impact of in-context examples and reasoning effort, providing practical implications for deployment and fine-tuning. We open-source SimulCost as a static benchmark and extensible toolkit to facilitate research on improving cost-aware agentic designs for physics simulations, and for expanding new simulation environments. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Rose-STL-Lab/SimulCost-Bench

Yadi Cao, Sicheng Lai, Jiahe Huang +12

University of California San Diego · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · Peking University +3

AI Agent BenchmarksLarge Language Model-Guided OptimizationLLM Agent EvaluationBenchmark DesignPhysics-Based Simulation
AskPDF
Mar 10, 2026

MedMASLab: A Unified Orchestration Framework for Benchmarking Multimodal Medical Multi-Agent Systems

While Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) show potential for complex clinical decision support, the field remains hindered by architectural fragmentation and the lack of standardized multimodal integration. Current medical MAS research suffers from non-uniform data ingestion pipelines, inconsistent visual-reasoning evaluation, and a lack of cross-specialty benchmarking. To address these challenges, we present MedMASLab, a unified framework and benchmarking platform for multimodal medical multi-agent systems. MedMASLab introduces: (1) A standardized multimodal agent communication protocol that enables seamless integration of 11 heterogeneous MAS architectures across 24 medical modalities. (2) An automated clinical reasoning evaluator, a zero-shot semantic evaluation paradigm that overcomes the limitations of lexical string-matching by leveraging large vision-language models to verify diagnostic logic and visual grounding. (3) The most extensive benchmark to date, spanning 11 organ systems and 473 diseases, standardizing data from 11 clinical benchmarks. Our systematic evaluation reveals a critical domain-specific performance gap: while MAS improves reasoning depth, current architectures exhibit significant fragility when transitioning between specialized medical sub-domains. We provide a rigorous ablation of interaction mechanisms and cost-performance trade-offs, establishing a new technical baseline for future autonomous clinical systems. The source code and data is publicly available at: https://github.com/NUS-Project/MedMASLab/

Yunhang Qian, Xiaobin Hu, Jiaquan Yu +6

National University of Singapore · University of Science and Technology of China · Fudan University +3

Multi-Agent SystemsMultimodal AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksMulti-Agent OrchestrationMultimodal Model EvaluationClinical Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 10, 2026

MA-EgoQA: Question Answering over Egocentric Videos from Multiple Embodied Agents

As embodied models become powerful, humans will collaborate with multiple embodied AI agents at their workplace or home in the future. To ensure better communication between human users and the multi-agent system, it is crucial to interpret incoming information from agents in parallel and refer to the appropriate context for each query. Existing challenges include effectively compressing and communicating high volumes of individual sensory inputs in the form of video and correctly aggregating multiple egocentric videos to construct system-level memory. In this work, we first formally define a novel problem of understanding multiple long-horizon egocentric videos simultaneously collected from embodied agents. To facilitate research in this direction, we introduce MultiAgent-EgoQA (MA-EgoQA), a benchmark designed to systemically evaluate existing models in our scenario. MA-EgoQA provides 1.7k questions unique to multiple egocentric streams, spanning five categories: social interaction, task coordination, theory-of-mind, temporal reasoning, and environmental interaction. We further propose a simple baseline model for MA-EgoQA named EgoMAS, which leverages shared memory across embodied agents and agent-wise dynamic retrieval. Through comprehensive evaluation across diverse baselines and EgoMAS on MA-EgoQA, we find that current approaches are unable to effectively handle multiple egocentric streams, highlighting the need for future advances in system-level understanding across the agents. The code and benchmark are available at https://ma-egoqa.github.io.

Kangsan Kim, Yanlai Yang, Suji Kim +4

KAIST · New York University · Samsung Electronics +1

Egocentric Video QAEmbodied QAAI Agent BenchmarksMemory-Augmented Video Understanding
AskPDF
Mar 10, 2026

MiniAppBench: Evaluating the Shift from Text to Interactive HTML Responses in LLM-Powered Assistants

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) in code generation, human-AI interaction is evolving from static text responses to dynamic, interactive HTML-based applications, which we term MiniApps. These applications require models to not only render visual interfaces but also construct customized interaction logic that adheres to real-world principles. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on algorithmic correctness or static layout reconstruction, failing to capture the capabilities required for this new paradigm. To address this gap, we introduce MiniAppBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate principle-driven, interactive application generation. Sourced from a real-world application with 10M+ generations, MiniAppBench distills 500 tasks across six domains (e.g., Games, Science, and Tools). Furthermore, to tackle the challenge of evaluating open-ended interactions where no single ground truth exists, we propose MiniAppEval, an agentic evaluation framework. Leveraging browser automation, it performs human-like exploratory testing to systematically assess applications across three dimensions: Intention, Static, and Dynamic. Our experiments reveal that current LLMs still face significant challenges in generating high-quality MiniApps, while MiniAppEval demonstrates high alignment with human judgment, establishing a reliable standard for future research. Our homepage is available in miniappbench.github.io.

Zuhao Zhang, Chengyue Yu, Yuante Li +3

Inclusion AI, Ant Group, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China · Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Web Application GenerationLLM EvaluationAutomated EvaluationAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 10, 2026

MM-tau-p2^2: Persona-Adaptive Prompting for Robust Multi-Modal Agent Evaluation in Dual-Control Settings

Current evaluation frameworks and benchmarks for LLM powered agents focus on text chat driven agents, these frameworks do not expose the persona of user to the agent, thus operating in a user agnostic environment. Importantly, in customer experience management domain, the agent's behaviour evolves as the agent learns about user personality. With proliferation of real time TTS and multi-modal language models, LLM based agents are gradually going to become multi-modal. Towards this, we propose the MM-tau-p2^2 benchmark with metrics for evaluating the robustness of multi-modal agents in dual control setting with and without persona adaption of user, while also taking user inputs in the planning process to resolve a user query. In particular, our work shows that even with state of-the-art frontier LLMs like GPT-5, GPT 4.1, there are additional considerations measured using metrics viz. multi-modal robustness, turn overhead while introducing multi-modality into LLM based agents. Overall, MM-tau-p2^2 builds on our prior work FOCAL and provides a holistic way of evaluating multi-modal agents in an automated way by introducing 12 novel metrics. We also provide estimates of these metrics on the telecom and retail domains by using the LLM-as-judge approach using carefully crafted prompts with well defined rubrics for evaluating each conversation.

Anupam Purwar, Aditya Choudhary

Sprinklr AI, Gurugram, India

Multimodal Agent EvaluationAgent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksMultimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal AgentsMulti-Turn Dialogue Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 10, 2026

LLMs for Text-Based Exploration and Navigation Under Partial Observability

Exploration and goal-directed navigation in unknown layouts are central to inspection, logistics, and search-and-rescue. We ask whether large language models (LLMs) can function as text-only controllers under partial observability -- without code execution, tools, or program synthesis. We introduce a reproducible benchmark with oracle localisation in fixed ASCII gridworlds: each step reveals only a local 5×55\times5 window around the agent and the model must select one of UP/RIGHT/DOWN/LEFT. Nine contemporary LLMs ranging from open/proprietary, dense / Mixture of Experts and instruction- vs. reasoning-tuned are evaluated on two tasks across three layouts of increasing difficulty: Exploration (maximising revealed cells) and Navigation (reach the goal on the shortest path). The experimental results are evaluated on quantitative metrics including success rate, efficiency such as normalised coverage and path length vs. oracle as well as qualitative analysis. Reasoning-tuned models reliably complete navigation across all layouts, yet remain less efficient than oracle paths. Few-shot demonstrations in the prompt chiefly help these Reasoning-tuned models by reducing invalid moves and shortening paths, while classic dense instruction models remain inconsistent. We observe characteristic action priors (UP/RIGHT) that can induce looping under partial observability. Overall, training regimen and test-time deliberation predict control ability better than raw parameter count. These findings suggest lightweight hybridisation with classical online planners as a practical route to deployable partial map systems.

Stephan Sandfuchs, Maximilian Melchert, Jörg Frochte

AKIS – Interdisciplinary Institute for Applied AI and Data Science Ruhr, Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany

Language Model-Based ControlRobot NavigationAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 10, 2026

Beyond Scaling: Assessing Strategic Reasoning and Rapid Decision-Making Capability of LLMs in Zero-sum Environments

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on static reasoning benchmarks, yet their effectiveness as interactive agents operating in adversarial, time-sensitive environments remains poorly understood. Existing evaluations largely treat reasoning as a single-shot capability, overlooking the challenges of opponent-aware decision-making, temporal constraints, and execution under pressure. This paper introduces Strategic Tactical Agent Reasoning (STAR) Benchmark, a multi-agent evaluation framework that assesses LLMs through 1v1 zero-sum competitive interactions, framing reasoning as an iterative, adaptive decision-making process. STAR supports both turn-based and real-time settings, enabling controlled analysis of long-horizon strategic planning and fast-paced tactical execution within a unified environment. Built on a modular architecture with a standardized API and fully implemented execution engine, STAR facilitates reproducible evaluation and flexible task customization. To move beyond binary win-loss outcomes, we introduce a Strategic Evaluation Suite that assesses not only competitive success but also the quality of strategic behavior, such as execution efficiency and outcome stability. Extensive pairwise evaluations reveal a pronounced strategy-execution gap: while reasoning-intensive models dominate turn-based settings, their inference latency often leads to inferior performance in real-time scenarios, where faster instruction-tuned models prevail. These results show that strategic intelligence in interactive environments depends not only on reasoning depth, but also on the ability to translate plans into timely actions, positioning STAR as a principled benchmark for studying this trade-off in competitive, dynamic settings.

Yang Li, Xing Chen, Yutao Liu +5

Tsinghua University · Ocean University of China (OUC) · CAICT +4

AI Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksStrategic Reasoning Risks in Language ModelsLong-Horizon Agent Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

MASEval: Extending Multi-Agent Evaluation from Models to Systems

The rapid adoption of LLM-based agentic systems has produced a rich ecosystem of frameworks (smolagents, LangGraph, AutoGen, CAMEL, LlamaIndex, i.a.). Yet existing benchmarks are model-centric: they fix the agentic setup and do not compare other system components. We argue that implementation decisions substantially impact performance, including choices such as topology, orchestration logic, and error handling. MASEval addresses this evaluation gap with a framework-agnostic library that treats the entire system as the unit of analysis. Through a systematic system-level comparison across 3 benchmarks, 3 models, and 3 frameworks, we find that framework choice matters as much as model choice. MASEval allows researchers to explore all components of agentic systems, opening new avenues for principled system design, and practitioners to identify the best implementation for their use case. MASEval is available under the MIT licence https://github.com/parameterlab/MASEval.

Cornelius Emde, Alexander Rubinstein, Anmol Goel +4

Parameter Lab · University of Oxford · University of Tübingen +4

AI Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent Orchestration
AskPDF