Human-in-the-Loop Annotation

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

13 papers in the last four weeks, up 117% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 95

Jul 18, 2026cs.CV

Foundation-Assisted Active Learning for Object Detection Annotation

The annotation cost for remote sensing object detection is high, while existing active learning methods still face several challenges in object detection scenarios, including the coupling of localization and classification uncertainty, severe localization noise in the cold-start stage, and pseudo-diversity caused by high-recall candidate proposals. To address these issues, we propose a foundation-model-collaborative active learning and semi-automatic annotation framework for efficient construction of remote sensing object detection datasets. We build a dual-source mechanism consisting of a reference localization source (SA-source) based on UPN+SAM2 and a detector prediction source (OD-source), and further propose a Foundation-model-enhanced Dual-Source Uncertainty estimation to improve sample selection quality in the cold-start stage by jointly modeling localization consistency and classification confidence. Furthermore, we propose Object-Centric Diversity Sampling, which constructs object-level representations using DINOv2 features and SAM2 masks to improve sample coverage while suppressing pseudo-diversity. To address geometric noise in the semi-automatic annotation stage, we design Dual-Source Box Switching, which replaces noisy detector boxes with matched refined boxes from the SA-source, thereby reducing the manual burden of box refinement. Experiments on DIOR, HRSC2016, DOTAv2, and FAIR1M show that our method achieves superior or comparable results under most annotation budgets, with notably stronger cold-start sample efficiency in the low-budget regime.

Jinchang Zhang, Arnold Zumbrun, Jing Lin +1

Intelligent Vision and Sensing (IVS) Lab at Indiana University Bloomington

Remote Sensing Image Understanding Remote Sensing Small Object Detection Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Active Learning Object Detection

Jul 16, 2026cs.AI

Self-Evolving Human-Centered Framework for Explainable Depression Symptom Annotation

Annotation quality is a major bottleneck in building reliable and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) systems for mental health research. In depression-related datasets, labels are often assigned without structured evidence, symptom-level justification, or traceable alignment with the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), limiting both transparency and downstream model interpretability. We propose a self-evolving, expert-in-the-loop annotation framework for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) that combines large language model (LLM)-assisted labeling with expert verification. The framework is intended to support the construction of explainable, DSM-5-TR-aligned datasets rather than to perform clinical diagnosis. It operates in three stages: candidate evidence selection from textual records, criterion-level DSM-5-TR analysis, and case-level synthesis that produces label-level diagnostic and severity annotations. A dual-memory architecture, composed of Example Memory and Reflection Memory, is designed to internalize expert feedback and iteratively improve future annotations without retraining. We describe this mechanism and leave its evaluation across multiple feedback cycles to future work. In addition to final labels, the framework exports clinical evidence, reasoning traces, and edit histories, enabling comprehensive auditability. In a pilot study using expert-reviewed samples, the proposed approach improves annotation consistency and explainability while reducing manual revision effort.

Hoang-Loc Cao, Van Pham, Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen +4

University of Science, VNU-HCM, Vietnam · University of New Brunswick, Canada · Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

Explainable Artificial Intelligence LLM-Assisted Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation

Jul 15, 2026cs.SD

From Prediction to Collaboration: Interactive Symbolic Music Analysis

Automatic symbolic music analysis has made substantial progress, yet existing systems are typically designed for a single mode of use, such as full-score prediction, and therefore do not match the broader range of operations that arise in analysis workflows, including partial completion, local correction, and iterative refinement. As a result, there remains a gap between strong benchmark models and systems that can support interactive analytical use. We present a unified framework for symbolic Roman-numeral (RN) analysis that narrows this gap by combining strong predictive performance with direct support for constrained completion and revision. The method is designed to provide a practical trade-off between accuracy and interactive responsiveness by computing expensive pretrained representations once and reusing them during iterative refinement, making powerful pretrained models more amenable to interactive settings. It supports complete score analysis, targeted revision of existing labels, and inference of missing annotations from partial context through a shared modeling framework. Experiments on Dilemmadata, the largest and most heterogeneous benchmark of its kind, show that the proposed approach is a strong RN-analysis baseline while also supporting masked completion from partial labels. Together with a prototype interface for multi-level candidate inspection and editing, these results position automatic RN analysis not only as a prediction problem, but also as a foundation for future interactive tools for music analysis.

Emmanouil Karystinaios, Johannes Hentschel, Markus Neuwirth +1

Department of Computational Percepetion, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria · Anton Brukner University Linz, Austria

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Music Information Retrieval

Jul 14, 2026cs.CV

Active Learning for Efficient Annotation of Surgical Videos with Weak Supervision

Precise spatial-temporal annotation of laparoscopic videos is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge. We propose a human-in-the-loop knowledge acquisition framework that combines active learning with dual-loss optimization to significantly reduce the annotation effort needed for automatic localization and segmentation of objects in the surgical field. Our method employs a foundation model to generate temporally consistent class activation maps (CAMs) from video using two complementary training objectives: a weak supervision loss on video-level tool presence labels for weakly annotated data, and an image-level mask loss on human-corrected annotations obtained through active learning. Rather than requiring dense pixel-level annotation upfront, our pipeline iteratively proposes pseudo-masks that guide the expert annotator to refine the knowledge previously captured by the model. We demonstrate that our framework reduces the effort of surgical video annotation by 50% by the end of training in comparison to fully manual annotation. Through eliminating the need for large, fully annotated datasets from the start, this framework enables scalability to the development of surgical tool segmentation models. This iterative human-in-the-loop refinement supports efficient knowledge acquisition with minimal expert input, providing a practical and deployable strategy for expanding tool segmentation to larger, more diverse datasets and real-world clinical settings.

Manasa Dendukuri, Matjaz Jogan, Daniel A. Hashimoto +1

1*GRASP Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, 3330 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. · 2PCASO Laboratory, Dept. of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. · 3Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 3330 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Video Object Segmentation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Active Learning Surgical Video Understanding Weakly Supervised Learning Medical Image Segmentation

Jul 1, 2026cs.CV

Spotted: Location-informed Reidentification of Hyenas and Leopards in Camera Trap Surveys

Animal re-identification (ReID) in camera-trap surveys remains challenging due to low image quality, strong variation in illumination and viewpoint, and highly imbalanced numbers of observations per individual. As a result, current ReID performance is often insufficient for fully automated use, and practical workflows typically depend on expert review of algorithmically proposed candidate matches. Moreover, most existing approaches focus almost exclusively on visual cues and overlook auxiliary information routinely available in field studies, such as image timestamps and camera-trap locations. We introduce Spotted, a location-informed, human-in-the-loop animal ReID framework that integrates visual similarity with spatio-temporal feasibility priors derived from camera locations, thereby reducing the amount of required expert review. Our method (i) computes an image-model-agnostic feasibility score based on the minimum travel speed required for two detections to correspond to the same individual, (ii) uses these feasibility cues as pseudo-supervision to train a lightweight head on top of a frozen visual foundation model, and (iii) fuses adapted visual similarity with spatio-temporal feasibility to obtain a robust pairwise matching score. We additionally integrate an active pair sampling strategy to accelerate annotation by initially prioritizing uncertain predictions. We evaluate Spotted on three challenging camera-trap ReID datasets comprised of spotted hyenas and leopards, which we release as part of this work. Our model improves average top-5 identification accuracy by 9pp, 2pp and 9pp over the best baseline on our LeopardID102, SpottedHyenaID109 and SpottedHyenaID415 datasets, respectively. Further, we show that our human-in-the-loop strategy reduces the number of queried comparisons by up to 69pp while achieving equivalent positive matches.

Halil Sina Kelebek, Julia Hindel, Kobus Hoffman +9

Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK · Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Germany · Bubye Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe +3

Animal Re-Identification Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Wildlife Monitoring

Jun 28, 2026cs.CL

A Hybrid Framework for Song Lyric Annotation Based on Human-LLM Alignment

Emotion recognition of song lyrics is a challenging task since lyrics may not necessarily align with the overall emotion of a song. As a result, lyrics annotation remains largely underexplored. Drawing inspiration from research in large language model (LLM) assisted annotation, we examine the alignment between humans and LLMs for annotation of lyrics by creating a new sentence-level dataset of lyrics. Our observations highlight the subjectivity of the task and the inherent challenges. Following this, we present a hybrid annotation framework that optimizes human and LLM annotation by predicting potential misalignment in annotation.

Rashini Liyanarachchi, Frank Tran, Md Mahmudul Hasan +2

School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Annotator Disagreement LLM-Assisted Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Emotion Recognition

Jun 25, 2026eess.AS

voxmap-studio: An open-source speaker diarization annotation tool with built-in cost instrumentation

Labeling speaker diarization data is costly, yet annotation tools rarely measure that cost. We present voxmap-studio, an open-source, React-based diarization annotation tool integrated with the pyannote-based diarization ecosystem. Its canvas is initialized by a fast stride-accelerated diarization engine so that the annotator corrects a hypothesis rather than drawing every speaker turn by hand, and the tool records annotation cost - typed edit-operation counts and time - as a first-class output, enabling quantitative comparison of how much different forms of assistance actually help. Export is gated on per-segment human confirmation and guarded by injected "phantom" attention checks, which prevent unverified automatic output from being released as ground truth. In a preliminary study on nine AMI audio files, unassisted manual annotation was the costliest and least accurate, and automatic initialization shifted the work from creating turns to correcting them; highlighting uncertain segments gave the lowest cost in our small sample. The tool and its instrumentation are open source.

Fumiaki Yamaguchi

Independent Researcher

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Speaker Diarization

Jun 25, 2026cs.CV

Mask to Concept: Auto-Promptable SAM3 via Efficient Test-Time Concept Embedding Search for Few-Shot Annotation

Transforming foundation segmentation models from human-prompted tools into auto-promptable annotators is critical for scalable medical data annotation. Current methods commonly depend on external feature matchers or auxiliary networks to automate geometric prompting, but introducing architectural overhead and limiting performance scalability. Although SAM3 natively supports concept segmentation via reusable text prompts, its direct use in medical imaging is hindered by a lack of fine-grained clinical knowledge and the ambiguity of human-written descriptions. In this work, we propose Mask to Concept (M2C), an efficient framework that adapts SAM3 for medical few-shot annotation without external modules, parameter retraining, or manual text engineering. Using only a few labeled images, M2C enables SAM3 to automatically search for transferable visual concepts entirely within its frozen architecture: it initializes a learnable concept embedding, uses it to prompt segmentation, and updates the embedding by gradients of minimizing the concept segmentation error. We further introduce a Hybrid Uncertainty Estimation (HUE) module that calculates the prediction entropy and maps concept predictions back to the box prompts, measuring concept-geometry prompting inconsistency. Highly uncertain samples are flagged actively for human correction, and the corrected masks are then fed back to M2C to continuously search for more precise concept embeddings, forming a self-enhancing annotation loop with minimal expert effort. Experiments on medical segmentation benchmarks show that our method achieves SOTA few-shot segmentation performance and outstanding annotation efficiency, offering a practical and efficient pathway toward scalable medical image labeling. Codes are at https://github.com/Huster-Hq/M2C.

Quan Zhou, Shaoqing Zhai, Qiang Hu +3

Wuhan University of Technology · Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Changzhou United lmaging Healthcare Surgical Technology Co. Ltd.

Medical Imaging Foundation Models Test-Time Adaptation Promptable Image Segmentation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Few-Shot Medical Image Segmentation

Jun 25, 2026cs.LG

Can Large Language Models Reliably Code Qualitative Humanitarian Data? A Benchmark Study Against Human Expert Adjudication

Data from affected populations are crucial for informing humanitarian response, but their value depends on timely and consistent interpretation of nuanced accounts of need. Humanitarian organizations often lack the staff, time, and specialist expertise required to analyze this information at scale. Large language models (LLMs) may expand this capacity, but their reliability for coding qualitative humanitarian data has not been directly established. This benchmark study compares 46 LLMs to a human Gold Standard using 150 high-fidelity synthetic humanitarian transcripts. Evaluation combined inter-rater reliability testing with Krippendorff's alpha, discrepancy analysis distinguishing correct, near-correct, and incorrect codes, and qualitative assessment across humanitarian-specific criteria including discrimination, complex needs hierarchies, and non-standard communication styles. The authors find that multiple LLMs can perform deductive coding at reliability levels comparable to experienced human coders, especially when structured prompts and reasoning-enabled configurations are used. At the same time, aggregate reliability metrics alone are insufficient for deployment decisions. Models varied in recognizing needs expressed indirectly, needs outside predefined categories, and protection-relevant concerns such as physical safety and discrimination. These findings suggest that LLMs can materially expand humanitarian analytical capacity, but not as substitutes for human judgment. Appropriate use requires structured codebooks, reasoning-enabled models, attention to theme-specific performance, and tiered oversight focused on categories where miscoding would have the greatest programmatic consequences. For sensitive humanitarian data, open-weights models deployed on self-hosted infrastructure may offer a viable path for combining analytical scalability with stronger data governance.

Jerome Marston, Tino Kreutzer, Salomé Garnier +3

Kobo Inc · McGill University · Harvard University

LLM Evaluation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation LLM Reliability

Jun 23, 2026cs.CL

Task Decomposition for Efficient Annotation

High-quality annotations of structured representations are expensive to collect over large corpora. Manual annotation of structure is laborious, and model-based annotation, although cheaper to generate, requires expensive validation and potentially significant supervision to ensure that the annotation quality is strong enough to be useful downstream. In traditional annotation workflows, annotation of each complete example is performed end-to-end by a single annotator. However, structured annotation is complex, and each aspect of the task represents a unique challenge with an associated inferential load for a given annotator. Modern annotation projects can incorporate heterogeneous groups of annotators, including both models and human annotators with varying domain and linguistic expertise. It remains unclear, however, how to redesign annotation tasks in this setting, where efforts are discriminately allocated across heterogeneous annotators with respect to distinct annotation challenges. We propose to decompose annotation tasks into sub-tasks in order to reduce the aggregate inferential load of annotation projects. Inspired by the notion of centers from centering theory, we introduce a formal model of inferential load based on the degrees of freedom in the space of valid annotations. Using this model, we show that identifying these centers (i.e. salient anchor entities realized by annotation sub-tasks) constrains the output space complexity, and decompositions which isolate and advance center identification reduce the aggregate inferential load. We provide guidelines for decomposing complex structured annotation tasks, supported by examples demonstrating improved cost-efficiency from our prior work. Finally, we present a procedure for allocating sub-tasks across annotators to maximize quality under a fixed budget.

Nupoor Gandhi, Emma Strubell

Carnegie Mellon University

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Task Decomposition

Jun 21, 2026cs.CV

Human and AI collaboration for pulmonary nodule segmentation

Medical expert annotators are scarce, and blind reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) can be misleading, motivating approaches in which humans, particularly junior medical trainees or even non-medical personnel, collaborate with AI to achieve robust medical segmentation. Although the Segment Anything Model (SAM) shows promise for general-purpose image segmentation, its performance in human-AI collaboration for specialized medical tasks has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here we present Hi-Seg, a human-in-the-loop segmentation framework for pulmonary nodules built on SAM. Humans iteratively refine prompts through trial-and-error learning and semantic reasoning, progressively guiding SAM toward higher-quality masks. Using chest CT scans from 1,179 patients across 12 centers, we conducted the first large-scale external validation of collaborative human-SAM segmentation. Across all annotator groups, Hi-Seg achieved a mean Dice score of almost 85%, outperforming five state-of-the-art deep learning models by 10-22% and 13 SAM variants by 1-29%. Hi-Seg improved segmentation accuracy while reducing annotation time for medical annotators, and briefly trained non-medical annotators achieved performance comparable to that of the junior medical student. These findings suggest that human-in-the-loop segmentation can reduce clinician workload, enable scalable crowdsourced annotation, and transform clinical workflows by facilitating the safe and efficient integration of foundation models into routine clinical practice.

Hongqiao Dong, Wenhao Chi, Ruobing Liang +9

State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Yau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China +5

Interactive Medical Image Segmentation Medical Imaging Foundation Models Promptable Image Segmentation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Medical Image Segmentation

Jun 18, 2026cs.CV

Speeding up the annotation process in semantic segmentation industrial applications

Current machine learning models commonly require large and well-annotated datasets. However, the annotation process often becomes a bottleneck, with increased complexity leading to higher chances of human errors. Within this context, our goal in this paper is to leverage unsupervised algorithms to improve data annotation efficiency for complex semantic segmentation problems in industrial materials science. Previous research has quantified labeling time and others explored unsupervised methods. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify how much unsupervised algorithms accelerate the labeling process. We aim to validate the extent to which this laborious process can be accelerated, focusing on semantic segmentation tasks that involve annotating each pixel of high-resolution images, such as the microstructure characterization challenge in materials science. Specifically, we demonstrate that by using unsupervised computer vision algorithms, the time required for the labeling process can be reduced from 170 hours to 37 hours, achieving an approximate reduction of 78%. The dataset we work with includes large images of dimensions 1280x959 and 960x703, which further increases the complexity of the annotation task. Despite these challenges, we create and share the largest public steel microstructure segmentation dataset to date, available under MIT License with permanent DOI, contributing a fully annotated, high-resolution dataset to the field. Additionally, this is the first work to compare the labeling time from scratch (a common approach in previous studies) to the labeling time when using these unsupervised algorithms as a pre-annotation step. Furthermore, we provide a Deep Learning model trained on this dataset, validated by field experts, and deployed in an industrial setting, serving as an initial benchmark for this public dataset.

Marta Fernandez-Moreno, Margarita Guerrero, Rosalia Rementeria +2

Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence, DaSCI, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain · Ingénica STS, Av. Pablo Iglesias 38, Bj, 33205, Gijón, Spain · ArcelorMittal Global R&D, SLab—Steel Labs, Calle Marineros 4, 33490, Avilés, Spain +1

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Semantic Segmentation Unsupervised Image Segmentation

Jun 17, 2026cs.HC

A Clinician-Centered Pipeline for Annotation and Evaluation in Ultrasound AI Studies

Clinician-centered evaluation is critical for validating medical AI systems, especially in ultrasound imaging where quantitative metrics do not always capture clinical usability. Existing medical image platforms primarily focus on dataset labeling. They lack integrated support for blinded model comparison and reproducible evaluation workflows. We present a clinician-centered pipeline for remote annotation and evaluation in ultrasound AI studies. The proposed pipeline uses a centralized server and lightweight browser interfaces to enable clinicians to perform annotation, blinded ranking, and review without local dataset downloads. The pipeline also supports multi-rater participation, centralized result aggregation, and automated statistical analysis. We validate the pipeline in a fetal ultrasound segmentation study with six raters spanning expert, generalist, and non-expert experience levels. The system automatically generated Spearman correlation, Kendall's

τ

, and top-1 selection statistics. Results indicated moderate to strong agreement across experts and other groups. The blinded evaluation results showed a tendency for later active learning models to be preferred. These outcomes suggest that the pipeline can support clinician-centered annotation and reproducible human-\ac{AI} evaluation studies in ultrasound imaging. The proposed pipeline is available on GitHub.

Fangyijie Wang, Jianjun Yu, Wentao Shi +4

Research Ireland Centre for Research Training in Machine Learning · School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland · The Third People’s Hospital of Zhenjiang City, Zhenjiang, China +3

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation Ultrasound Imaging Automated Evaluation

Jun 17, 2026cs.CV

From Bounding Boxes to Visual Reasoning: An On-Policy Data Annotation Tool for Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) are rapidly advancing toward sophisticated grounded structured visual reasoning. Training models for such advanced capabilities demands a new genre of data that seamlessly unifies spatial coordinates, open-vocabulary descriptions, structured attributes, and topological relationships into a singular representation. However, existing data annotation tools fundamentally fail to meet these intricate demands, suffering from three systematic bottlenecks: limited expressiveness, severe annotation-training decoupling, and poor data reusability. To bridge this infrastructure gap, we introduce an open-source annotation tool, ScreenAnnotator. First, we define a unified annotation atom schema that binds spatial, semantic, and structural primitives into a single unit. Second, we implement an on-policy annotation loop embedded with a Bayesian Annotation Verifier (BAV). Finally, we design a template-driven multi-task data synthesis process dynamically transforms static atoms into diverse multi-dimensional reasoning tasks, eliminating redundant re-annotation. The on-policy loop drives the annotation accept rate to nearly 100% on flowcharts and 77% on GUI screenshots, while steadily reducing per-image annotation time as labeled data accumulate. In the flowchart scenario, fine-tuning a VLM yields 76.1% average accuracy, which is a 35.1% point absolute gain. Our code is available at: https://github.com/WnQinm/Annotator.

Like Zhang, Runliang Niu, Shiqi Wang +5

School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University · College of Computer Science, Jilin University · OPPO

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation VLM Reasoning

Jun 14, 2026cs.CV

ARGUSTRACK: A Multi-View Annotation System for Multi-Object Tracking

Multi-Camera Multi-Target (MCMT) tracking has emerged as a critical capability for applications ranging from autonomous driving to animal behavior monitoring. While recent advances have yielded sophisticated tracking algorithms, the availability of annotated multi-view data remains a significant bottleneck. Existing annotation tools predominantly support single-camera workflows or rely on LiDAR sensors, making cross-view labeling tedious and impractical for camera-only setups. We present ARGUS-TRACK, a multi-camera annotation system that addresses these limitations by enabling annotators to work directly on a bird's-eye-view (BEV) plane. Given calibrated camera parameters, a single ground-plane annotation is automatically projected into 2D bounding boxes across all relevant views, inherently ensuring identity consistency without manual cross-view alignment. To further accelerate the labeling process, ARGUSTRACK incorporates two complementary mechanisms: a Temporal Aware module that propagates annotations from preceding frames to initialize new ones, requiring only minor positional adjustments; and a Multi-camera Semi-annotation module that leverages off-the-shelf 2D detectors combined with foot-point estimation to automatically generate candidate BEV positions for annotator verification. We evaluate ARGUSTRACK through a pilot study on multi-camera broiler tracking and demonstrate that it substantially reduces annotation time compared to conventional single-camera labeling workflows.

Hao Vo, Duc Nguyen, Ngan Le

AICV Lab, University of Arkansas, USA

Multi-View Consistency Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Multi-Object Tracking

Jun 14, 2026cs.LG

Surprise-Guided MergeSort: Budget-Efficient Human-in-the-Loop Ranking via Adaptive Comparison Scheduling

Pairwise comparison is the gold standard for subjective ranking tasks; however, exhaustive annotation requires a massive number of human comparisons (

O(n^2)

). While sorting-based methods have reduced this burden to

O(n\log n)

, they still require expensive human judgment for every single comparison. To further improve annotation efficiency, we propose leveraging a Vision-Language Model (VLM) not as an annotator replacement, but as a \emph{question prioritizer} to identify which comparisons genuinely require human judgment. The proposed \textbf{Surprise-Guided MergeSort (SGS)} framework achieves this through three integrated components: (1) a bottom-up MergeSort scheduler that structures comparisons and exploits transitivity, (2) a composite Surprise Scorer -- combining position-bias-cancelled VLM confidence, Elo gap, and vote entropy -- to quantify comparison ambiguity, and (3) an adaptive budget allocator that routes high-surprise pairs to humans while automating low-surprise pairs via transitivity inference. Validation was conducted on six diverse benchmarks spanning text similarity (STS-B, BIOSSES, SICKR-STS) and image quality assessment (KonIQ-10k, TID2013, LIVE Challenge). SGS effectively identified and skipped up to 535 non-informative comparisons per session. Consequently, it achieved Kendall's

τ{\times}100

improvements of

+6

to

+12

over Active Elo under the same total budget. These results demonstrate that combining VLM-guided surprise metrics with algorithmic sorting provides a generally consistent accuracy-efficiency trade-off across diverse domains.

Yujin Park, Haejun Chung, Ikbeom Jang

Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea · Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Republic of Korea

Pairwise Preference Learning Pairwise Comparison Pairwise Preference Evaluation Learning to Rank Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Active Learning+1

Jun 12, 2026cs.AI

Metric Match: A Subset Selection Approach to Evaluating LLM Judge Reliability

LLM judges are used to reduce the need for costly human labor in evaluating open-ended text generation. However, the reliability of these judges depends critically on their alignment with human raters -- a property that itself depends on costly human annotations. In this work, we develop a method (Metric Match) for estimating correlation-based reliability metrics of LLM judges from limited annotations. Metric Match selects a subset of samples for human annotation such that the subset matches the population reliability metric with respect to acquired synthetic labels. We empirically show that Metric Match achieves a win-rate of 0.838 against random subset selection across four different correlation metrics and 15 datasets, with an 18.7% decrease in average estimation error and reduces annotation needs by 32.5%. We provide a cost model and highlight a medical case study where our method saves $1,041.67 compared to random selection for expert annotation. Further, we shift our task from reliability estimation to reliability classification of whether a given judge is above a deployment threshold, outperforming random selection with Metric Match. All project code is publicly available, and we additionally provide an installable package for ease of use.

Alyssa Unell, Natalie Dullerud, Naomi Boneh +4

Department of Computer Science Stanford University · Department of Medicine Stanford University

LLM-as-a-Judge Language Model Generation Evaluation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation LLM Reliability

Jun 10, 2026cs.CL

A Resource for Enthymeme Detection in Controversial Political Discourse

Enthymemes, arguments with unstated premises or conclusions, are pervasive in persuasive discourse, yet their annotation remains notoriously subjective. We present a resource of 1,482 tweets from politically controversial discourse, annotated by five annotators for the presence of enthymemes and their argument structure, designed to study label variation. We first revisit the definition of enthymemes and propose annotation guidelines anchored in Walton's argumentation schemes, offering a structured and constrained approach that nonetheless preserves room for the interpretive nature of the task. This contrasts with past resources, which tend to eliminate disagreement, obscuring its sources and preventing investigation of its potential benefits for model performance. We further propose a complexity analysis of the task, identifying where annotation imposes high cognitive load and may give rise to inconsistent annotation. Our preliminary experiments show that models trained on annotator disagreement outperform models trained on hard majority-vote labels. We close by reflecting on how structural openness in enthymeme definitions and guidelines enables the study of variation in subjective inferential processes for future resources and downstream NLP applications concerned with human inference.

Martial Pastor, Nelleke Oostdijk

Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen

Annotator Disagreement Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Text Classification Computational Argumentation

Jun 9, 2026cs.CL

Measuring Human Value Expression in Social Media Texts: Calibrated LLM Annotation and Encoder Transfer

Measuring subjective constructs in naturally occurring social media text requires annotation procedures that are theoretically grounded, empirically validated, and transferable to an encoder model for scalable prediction. Using non-English social media posts annotated according to Schwartz's theory of basic human values, we investigate how different LLMs, prompts, and instruction languages operationalize the expression of values in text. We argue that although texts may permit multiple plausible interpretations, theory-based value definitions can constrain interpretations and reduce spurious value attributions. Beyond precision, recall, and F1, we evaluate structural alignment between values, error structure, confidence-ambiguity relations, and annotation stability. We show that different LLMs produce different value interpretations. Iterative prompt calibration through error analysis reduces misattributions and improves alignment with expert annotations. We also derive targeted expert verification rules from recurrent error structures and use them during corpus annotation. Finally, we show that LLM annotations can be transferred to an encoder model through soft-label training, retaining theory-based value interpretations and information about uncertainty in value expression.

Maria Milkova, Maksim Rudnev

Independent researcher, Lisbon, Portugal · University of Waterloo, ON, Canada

Soft-Label Learning LLM-Assisted Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Language Model Calibration

Jun 8, 2026cs.CV

iSAGE: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Remote Sensing Semantic Segmentation via Sparse Point Supervision

Semantic segmentation in remote sensing requires costly pixel-level annotations, and nearly every problem demands a new dataset since models rarely transfer across sensors, platforms, or geographies. Existing human-in-the-loop frameworks expand sparse clicks into dense supervision via auxiliary machinery (pseudo-labels, propagation, CRFs, foundation-model prompts, auxiliary heads), all operating on the model's predictive distribution. A confidently wrong pixel is indistinguishable from a confidently correct one in that distribution by construction, so no rule reading it can separate the two; the distinguishing signal is external to the model. This paper hypothesizes that expert clicks targeting confident model errors, not arbitrary pixels, suffice to match dense supervision, with no expansion machinery. iSAGE (Iterative Sparse Annotation Guided by Expert) realizes this hypothesis on an integrated open-source platform, where an error-weighted loss amplifies the gradient at each click and the annotation record itself is the dataset, extensible, correctable, and auditable. Experiments use a minimum-effort regime: at most one labeled pixel per class per frame. On BsB Aerial, iSAGE recovers 97.2% of dense supervision (74.79% mIoU on 0.040% of pixels) with contrasting class dynamics: amorphous classes (permeable areas) saturate from the seed, while small classes (cars) require late-iteration effort. On ISPRS Vaihingen (external benchmark), iSAGE reaches 76.78% mIoU with 0.011% of pixels, matching the dense baseline (76.65%) and exceeding all published methods. Under the same pipeline, four output-reading mechanisms (oracle entropy across budgets 1--100x, pseudo-labels across thresholds 0.90--0.99, CRF-based propagation, uniform random) plateau 7.4 to 14.5 pp below iSAGE. Across 31 surveyed methods, iSAGE is the only iterative human-in-the-loop framework operating without auxiliary machinery.

Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho, Osmar Abilio de Carvalho Junior, Anesmar Olino de Albuquerque +1

Remote Sensing Image Segmentation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Active Learning Semantic Segmentation

Jun 7, 2026cs.LG

Deep Active Re-Labeling: Toward Noise-Resilient Annotation Efficiency

While Deep Active Learning (DAL) effectively reduces human annotation costs, its efficacy is constrained by human annotation errors. This is because the data sampled for active learning is assumed to be highly informative for training. When human annotators introduce errors into this informative data at a certain rate, the active learning performance drops significantly and, in some cases, even exhibits worse outcomes than passive learning. In this paper, we first analyze the impact of human annotation errors in the DAL setting. Then we propose a framework to address the human annotation noise problem for DAL. Informed by human learning patterns, the core idea of our proposed solution involves allocating a portion of the human annotation budget to re-annotate data that has already been labeled. Previous theoretical work suggests that when the model possesses a certain level of ability to identify potentially noisy data, even re-labeling a small fraction of the data can effectively remove noise from the active training set. To achieve this, we implement two active noise sampling strategies to detect noise under different circumstances and allocate a part of the annotation budget to re-annotate these instances. Our approach imbues active learning with a revisiting and introspective behavior. Our experiments demonstrate that, under the same annotation budget, our method is more data-efficient and yields a relatively noise-free annotation dataset in the end.

Md Abdullah Al Forhad, Weishi Shi

Active Machine Learning Lab · Learning · Language · Vision (LLaVi) Lab · Department of Computer Science and Engineering +1

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Active Learning Learning with Noisy Labels Data-Efficient Learning

Jun 3, 2026cs.AI

Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark

Knowledge benchmarks for LLMs face three issues: scaling-driven designs that do not operationalize disciplinary representativeness; flat-payment annotation that permits lazy consensus; and unaudited ranking instability under bounded test budgets. We introduce KINA, an 899-item benchmark across 261 fine-grained disciplines, with two formal results. First, we cast representativeness as a coverage-style objective over expert-elicited anchors and operationalize disciplinary representativeness through a proxy, yielding a (1-1/e) greedy approximation (Proposition 1); the guarantee applies to the proxy, not to population representativeness. Second, we prove a bonus-on-bar tournament weakly FOSD-dominates flat payment in released-review quality, with incentive-compatibility threshold B > Delta C / Delta p_min (Theorem 1). Evaluating 42 models from 13 labs, the top model, Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview, reaches 53.17%, followed by Claude-Opus-4.6 at 49.92% and GPT-5.4 at 48.55%, leaving substantial headroom below saturation. The full leaderboard shows a tiered structure rather than a smooth total order: a small frontier tier lies above 48%, a dense strong-model tier spans roughly 38-45%, and low-performing models remain only modestly above the 10% chance baseline. Tool augmentation adds up to 5.17 points across the five tool-use evaluations, with gains varying substantially across models. We report bootstrap ranking-stability statistics to make bounded-budget variance explicit and to discourage over-interpretation of adjacent ranks.

Sheng Jin, Minghao Liu, Yunze Xiao +24

12077AI · 2M-A-P · 3Carnegie Mellon University +7

LLM Evaluation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Factual Knowledge in Language Models

Jun 3, 2026cs.CV

IMPose: Interactive Multi-person Pose Estimation with Dynamic Correction Propagation

High-quality dynamic human pose annotation equips AI with precise motion kinematics to enable human behavior mastery, yet remains labor-intensive and time-consuming. Current annotation tools either lack temporal correction propagation or fail in multi-person scenarios, necessitating excessive manual intervention. In this paper, we introduce IMPose, an interactive tool for multi-person dynamic pose annotation. It features a dual-level tracking mechanism that propagates one-frame multi-person pose corrections from annotators across entire videos. The keypoint-level ensures corrections temporal propagation via sequential modeling, while the instance-level employs keypoint-aware embedding with relative positional encoding to maintain multi-person cross-frame consistency. To further improve robustness, IMPose maintains historical pose and instance cues in a trajectory bank, which enhances long-range temporal association and stabilizes annotation in challenging cases such as occlusion and motion blur. By converting sparse human corrections into dense and coherent pose trajectories, our framework significantly reduces repeated manual refinement across frames. Extensive experiments show that IMPose consistently achieves a strong accuracy efficiency trade off under different interaction budgets, demonstrating particular advantages in low click annotation settings. IMPose achieves high precision annotation with high efficiency, requiring only 27 clicks per 1,050 frame video on 3DPW and 3 clicks per tracklet per 84-frame on PoseTrack21. We further expand PoseTrack21 with 188K pose instances (3.55M keypoints) at a minimal cost of 10 annotators in 10 hours. The annotation tool, codes, and extended dataset will be open-sourced.

Haoyang Ge, Jian Ma, Ziwen Wang +5

Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China · Tiandi, Tianjin, China · Zhongguancun Academy, Beijing 100094, China

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Human Pose Estimation

Jun 2, 2026cs.CL

ACAT: A Collaborative Platform for Efficient Aspect-Based Sentiment Dataset Annotation

Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) requires high-quality datasets to train reliable models. However, existing annotation tools treat output as flat files, leaving researchers to manually consolidate multi-annotator data, reconstruct relational structures, and compute reliability metrics through custom scripts. This paper introduces ACAT (Aspect-based sentiment analysis Collaborative Annotation Tool), a web-based platform natively supporting four ABSA workflows: (1) Aspect-Category Sentiment Analysis, (2) Clause-Level Segmentation, (3) Aspect-Term Sentiment Analysis with character-level position tracking, and (4) Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction with dual span offset preservation. Its core contribution is an automated Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) pipeline that aligns collaborative annotations and computes Inter-Annotator Agreement (IAA) metrics directly at export, yielding training-ready datasets. In a preliminary validation on 1,002 restaurant reviews with two annotators of differing expertise, ACAT achieves a median annotation time of 31.58 seconds and a raw IAA ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 across all tasks.

Ana-Maria Luisa Mocanu, Ciprian-Octavian Truica, Elena-Simona Apostol

1National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Romania · 2Academy of Romanian Scientists, Ilfov 3, Bucharest, 050044, Romania

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

Jun 2, 2026cs.CL

Framing Migration News with LLMs: Structured CoT as a Support for Human Interpretation

Frame analysis of migration news is a socially consequential task: media scholars and researchers who study how migration is narrated need tools that are not only accurate, but transparent, auditable, and accessible within the resource constraints typical of academic research groups. Existing LLM-based approaches rely on proprietary APIs and large models that raise concerns about data privacy, reproducibility and equitable access among media researchers. This work studies how a locally deployable open-source LLM can support interpretable frame analysis as an assistive tool. We introduce a Structured Chain-of-Thought (SCoT) prompting approach using Llama3-8B, enabling step-by-step justifications grounded in predefined framing categories. This structured design allows users to audit model outputs and examine alternative interpretations in a task that is inherently subjective. We evaluate our approach on a dataset of migration-related news and show that SCoT improves classification performance over zero-shot and few-shot baselines while remaining feasible on a single GPU. Then, we conduct a human-centered evaluation in which annotators assess the coherence and influence of "the model's reasoning". Results indicate that SCoT explanations are generally perceived as logical (mean score 4.1/5, though with notable variation across texts) and can prompt reflection on initial interpretations, even when disagreement persists. Our findings highlight both the potential and risks of LLM-assisted frame analysis. While structured reasoning can increase the traceability of model outputs and support critical interpretation, it can also influence human judgment in subtle ways. By enabling local deployment and emphasizing human-in-the-loop interaction, this work contributes to discussions on responsible and accessible computational tools for the study of socially impactful media narratives.

David Alonso del Barrio, Jing Wen, Daniel Gatica-Perez

Idiap Research Institute and EPFL Switzerland

LLM Interpretability CoT Reasoning LLM-Assisted Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation

Jun 1, 2026cs.CL

Fixing FOLIO and MALLS: Verified Annotations and an LLM-assisted Framework to Focus Human Relabeling

Accurate translation from Natural Language to First-Order Logic (NL-to-FOL) underpins neurosymbolic AI systems and Natural Language Inference (NLI), making the quality of NL-to-FOL benchmarks essential---yet these datasets have never been rigorously audited. Our first contribution is to present a systematic human inspection of the validation split of \textsf{FOLIO} and a subset of \textsf{MALLS} test instances, finding that approximately 42.5% and 42% of entries, respectively, contain incorrect FOL formalizations (i.e., ground truth labels), with additional rates of ambiguous NL sentences (17.8% and 51%) and incorrect NLI labels in \textsf{FOLIO} (8.4%). Our second contribution is to develop and release corrected ground truths for such datasets, showing that annotation errors distort model evaluation on a reference benchmark task: testing three state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemma~4 31B-it, Qwen3-30B-A3B, and GPT-4o-mini) with the corrected ground truths yields accuracy gains from +11 to +23 percentage points. Motivated by these findings, we propose an LLM-based framework to support humans in manual reviewing NL-to-FOL datasets. By directing reviewers toward the most error-prone instances, we empirically show that it is possible to achieve 90% dataset accuracy after reviewing fewer than 20% of instances, compared to over 76% required by unguided review. We release all human-verified annotations and the code for our framework.

Andrea Brunello, Cristian Curaba, Luca Geatti +3

University of Udine, Italy

LLM-Assisted Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Natural Language Inference

Jun 1, 2026cs.CL

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

Human annotation is the empirical foundation of much NLP research, from dataset construction to model evaluation, but papers often leave unclear who produced the annotations and how the annotation process was controlled. We provide the first large-scale, task-level audit of human annotation reporting across major NLP venues, asking which annotation details are documented, which are missing, and how reporting varies across time, topic, venue, and intended use of human judgment. We introduce a unified taxonomy of annotation-reporting practices and validate an LLM-assisted extraction pipeline against Annotated-gold, a human-adjudicated gold standard of 41 papers and 72 annotation tasks, where the best model reaches human-comparable agreement with adjudicated labels, with Krippendorff's alpha of 0.606 versus 0.585 for human-human agreement. Using this pipeline, we construct Annotated-llm, a dataset covering ACL-venue papers from 2018-2025, with 2,667 extracted annotation tasks from 1,603 papers, and find that papers frequently report operational details such as recruitment strategies, annotator expertise, and annotation volume, but often omit details needed to assess annotation validity, including training, language proficiency, compensation, socio-demographics, adjudication, and agreement values, especially in model-evaluation studies. Our results show that annotation reporting in NLP has improved over time but remains uneven, and they establish a scalable framework and bare-minimum reporting recommendations for making human annotation more reliable, reproducible, and interpretable.

Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli +10

NLLG Lab University of Technology Nuremberg · Interdisciplinary Transformation University, Austria

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation

Jun 1, 2026cs.CL

Machine Learning for Coding Retail Product Names to Consumer-Price Categories: A Rule-plus-Bag-of-Words Pipeline with Reliability-Weighted Human-in-the-Loop Labeling

Consumer-price measurement increasingly draws on alternative data sources -- scanner, web-scraped, and transaction/receipt data -- whose product descriptions are short, noisy, and carry no standard product code, so each item must first be mapped to a consumption classification (e.g., the UN COICOP scheme) before prices can be compared. This paper studies that mapping as a general, reproducible method. The pipeline is: (i) text normalization and tokenization of noisy item names; (ii) a prefix-tree (trie) rule-based pre-classifier driven by per-category key-phrases and stop-phrases; and (iii) a per-category binary confirmation model. For labels at scale we use a human-in-the-loop protocol in which annotators give a binary valid/reject judgment aggregated by a dynamically updated reliability weight; the model joins the same rule, enabling continual fine-tuning. On a reproducible synthetic benchmark of six COICOP-like categories, under one matched protocol, cheap models win and order-sensitive ones do not help: a character n-gram logistic regression tops every category (mean F1 = 0.997), word-order features add nothing, and small CNN/LSTM models are the weakest in this small-data regime. The trie alone admits only 32-50% of items, so the learned stage is necessary, and about 66 labels per category suffice. A Monte-Carlo study of the labeling protocol is self-critical: the reliability-weighted vote barely beats plain majority while Dawid-Skene recovers labels markedly better. No proprietary or production data are used; all code and synthetic data are released at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20909563

Vladimir Beskorovainyi

Besk Tech · Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT)

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Text Classification Classification Learning with Noisy Labels

May 29, 2026cs.CL

Beyond Agreement: Scoring Panel-Surfaced Biomedical Entity Candidates for Curator Triage

Biomedical NER is deceptively simple for modern LLMs: plausible biomedical mentions are easy to surface, but corpus-convention correctness depends on annotation conventions, span boundaries, entity granularity, and type schemas. Multi-LLM agreement is a salience signal, not corpus-convention correctness. We introduce a candidate-level panel-output benchmark for panel-surfaced candidate verification, where the unit is an aligned candidate surfaced by an explicitly defined multi-model panel rather than a standalone extractor output. The benchmark aligns eight LLMs' predictions over five public biomedical NER datasets into a candidate master table. BioConCal is an in-domain supervised scorer that instantiates this layer with inference-time gold-free agreement, mention, surface-availability, and document features for a fixed candidate stream. In domain, BioConCal improves AUROC from 0.753 for raw agreement to 0.910. At a validation-selected 0.95 precision target it selects 1,340 candidates at empirical test precision 0.939, compared with 293 for raw agreement. This corresponds to candidate-level recall 0.592 and corpus-level recall 0.523 against a within-panel row-label ceiling of 0.883. The main benefit is not recovering entities missed by every panel member, but reshaping a noisy panel stream into a higher-yield review queue. Under entity-type shift, thresholds require target-domain validation, and exact character localization remains a separate deterministic post-processing step.

Shuheng Cao, Ruiqi Chen, Renjie Cao +3

University of California, San Diego · University of Michigan, Ann Arbor · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou +2

Named Entity Recognition LLM-Assisted Annotation Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Language Model Ensembles

May 28, 2026cs.CV

Motion-guided sparse correction enables expert-quality point tracking across diverse microscopy regimes

Tracking the dynamics of non-canonical biological systems in microscopy videos remains a persistent challenge. Both classical and learning-based trackers depend on expert-reviewed data to be evaluated and adapted, yet exhaustive manual annotation rarely scales to the videos where these tools are needed most. We developed RIPPLE (Refinement Interpolation Platform for Point Location Estimation), which recasts annotation as sparse correction: a user clicks a starting point, RIPPLE proposes a full trajectory, and the user intervenes only where the trajectory drifts. We tested RIPPLE on five challenging microscopy datasets from our laboratories, four from the transparent jellyfish Clytia hemisphaerica and one tracking landmarks on rapidly moving sperm. Across these, RIPPLE matched the quality of exhaustive manual annotation while reducing manual clicks by 3 to 25 times across datasets. RIPPLE thereby fills a missing layer between manual annotation and fully automated tracking, enabling immediate quantification of biological dynamics, method benchmarking, and the production of the gold-standard data needed to adapt future automated microscopy trackers.

Leonidas Zimianitis, Pasindu Thenahandi, Kai Buckhalter +10

Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA · Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA · The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA +4

Point Tracking Human-in-the-Loop Annotation Microscopy Image Analysis