Prompt Optimization

We argue that forgetting is not confined to continual learning but is a general optimization phenomenon: during standard training, dominant mini-batch gradients suppress rare but useful update directions, causing short-term forgetting at every step. When such knowledge is never revisited, these losses compound into long-term forgetting-the classical failure mode of continual learning. We introduce FOGO, a scalable optimizer that continuously detects and resolves gradient interference across both regimes. FOGO spectrally orthogonalizes momentum updates to prevent dominant directions from monopolizing optimization, then stores representative past directions in a compact codebook memory built on random projection, where pairwise distances are provably preserved in low-dimensional space. At each step, conflicts between the current update and stored directions are resolved via lightweight orthogonal correction and lifted back through a proximal step, with minimal overhead and no data storage. Across class-imbalanced classification, continual visual learning under domain and class shifts, continual fine-tuning of LLaVA-7B, and GPT-2 pretraining, FOGO consistently improves convergence and knowledge retention, outperforming Adam and Muon.

While Ising machines serve as advanced physical solvers for the Ising model,enabling applications in combinatorial optimization and neural network training,their scalability for large-scale neural networks remains constrained by hardware connectivity limitations and suboptimal training methodologies. In this work,we leverage a Coherent Ising Machine (CIM) to train an energy-based neural network using Equilibrium Propagation, achieving performance comparable to existing software-based implementations. We further enhance the algorithm by integrating the Adam optimizer to solve for the ground state of a Hopfield energy network, significantly improving convergence speed and solution accuracy. Additionally, we demonstrate the scalability of our approach across deeper network architectures and convolutional operations. Our results highlight the potential of CIM dynamics as a scalable platform for training complex neural networks, offering a pathway toward energy-efficient implementations via analog circuits, optoelectronics, or integrated photonics. This work establishes a novel physical framework for next-generation AI hardware development.

We propose a new framework for optimisation over non-Archimedean spaces inspired by Berkovich geometry. Specifically, we introduce polydisc spaces, which consists of products of closed balls over a non-Archimedean field. These spaces retain the rigid hierarchical structure of the non-Archimedean field whilst acquiring many desirable geometric features absent from it. We show that metric trees embed naturally into these spaces, demonstrating their capacity to represent hierarchical data. We study their metric geometry, establishing properties such as geodesic uniqueness, confirming their comaptibility with classical optimisation techniques. We further propose a class of real-valued functions given by linear combinations of absolute values of polynomials. These functions admit a piecewise polynomial description along geodesics and satisfy a universal approximation property. We formulate a theory of optimisation on polydisc spaces: we prove existence of minimisers and explore algorithms for finding them. We provide an accompanying open-source Julia library implementing the core objects and optimisation procedures introduced.

Long, multimodal documents force retrieval-augmented systems to assemble answers from evidence fragmented across text, tables, and slides broken across cells in a long table, spread over multiple slides, or split between a figure and its discussion. Top-$k$ chunk retrieval treats each fragment independently and cannot represent how evidence connects. We introduce FLOWREADER, which reframes evidence assembly as a min-cost flow problem on a multimodal node graph: a single scoring vector $h$ controls source selection (via MMR), sink selection (via a length-aware answerability proxy), and the costs and capacities of every edge. The optimal flow is decomposed into candidate evidence paths, a compact non-redundant subset is selected by entropy-regularized replicator dynamics, and parallel VLM workers under a dual-process gate produce the answer with a single System-2 refinement pass triggered when answer consistency is low or the routed flow is strained. On VisDoMBench, FLOWREADER is best on the two subsets dominated by fragmented evidence PaperTab ($58.40$, $+1.30$ over G^{2}-Reader) and SlideVQA ($72.93$, $+0.62$) and competitive on SPIQA, FetaTab, and SciGraphQA. Macro-averaged across all five subsets, FLOWREADER ($65.47$) is within $0.74$ of the strongest baseline (G^{2}-Reader, $66.21$). Overall, these results show that min-cost flow performs well on fragmented multimodal evidence, where top-$k$ retrieval fails. It also provides a unified way to control scoring, routing, selection, and adaptive compute together.

Verifiable reward training has improved mathematical and coding reasoning, but these domains capture only part of step-by-step decision making. Many real-world tasks require finding a high-value feasible plan among many valid alternatives. We introduce OPT*, a scalable family of optimization-style tasks for training and evaluating LLM step-by-step optimization-like reasoning along a complexity axis: each task provides a feasibility checker and evaluator, while a complexity parameter expands the search space without requiring new human labels. This motivates studying these tasks in two regimes: (i) solver-guided online policy optimization, which uses a solver as a value oracle for partial states and applies rank-based reward shaping to reinforce better next steps, and (ii) search-based offline RL when such solvers are unavailable. Theoretically, we relate success in large search spaces to the information a reasoner extracts per unit of search budget. Empirically, we ablate the ingredients that make search efficient on OPT* and show that training on OPT* improves step-by-step optimization-like reasoning.

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically formulate and solve optimization problems from natural language has emerged as an efficient paradigm for automated optimization. However, existing methods still exhibit limited generalization: they are sensitive to superficial narrative variations, reuse experience mainly at the case level, and struggle to adapt to shifted or emerging problem types. We propose OptSkills, an archetype-centric skill learning and reasoning agent system for optimization modeling and solving. To improve robust generalization, our system clusters problems by their underlying archetypes rather than surface narratives. To improve in-distribution generalization, it explores diverse modeling paradigms and solver configurations within each cluster, then distills successful trajectories into reusable workflow-level skills. To improve out-of-distribution generalization, it refines existing skills or expands the skill library using newly obtained trajectories. Our system achieves a state-of-the-art micro-averaged accuracy of 68.27% on datasets encompassing diverse problem types and scenarios. In addition, on MIPLIB-NL, a highly challenging large-scale and high-dimensional benchmark, it achieves 26.91% accuracy, outperforming DeepSeek-V3.2-Thinking by 4.53%. After skill learning on Nano-CO, it reaches 72.79% on the OOD NLCO benchmark. Code and skills are available at https://github.com/fujiwaranoM0kou/OptSkills.

Language models can use verifiable rewards to improve at a wide variety of reasoning tasks. However, both parametric (e.g. RLVR) and non-parametric (e.g. prompt optimization) approaches to doing so typically require hundreds of training samples and thousands of model rollouts, making them expensive in the best case and intractable in the worst. To address this challenge, we introduce Contrastive Reflection (CORE), a non-parametric learning algorithm that compares past reasoning traces to generate insights: short natural-language descriptions of reasoning strategies and constraints that capture differences between successful and unsuccessful problem attempts. Across four reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that CORE enables more rapid improvement than both parametric (GRPO) and non-parametric (GEPA, episodic RAG, and MemRL) methods, while using fewer rollouts. Under fixed rollout budgets with as few as five training samples, CORE achieves the strongest performance in most task-data regimes. Finally, we highlight how CORE is substantially more context-efficient than non-parametric baselines, requiring fewer prompt tokens while storing learned knowledge as compact, interpretable natural-language insights. Our results therefore suggest that distilling contrasts between successful and unsuccessful reasoning traces into abstract and useful insights can provide a more efficient and interpretable route to model self-improvement than weight updates, prompt optimization, or direct reuse of stored reasoning traces.

Aligning LLMs for math tutoring typically requires RL-based training with multi-GPU infrastructure. We investigate whether training-free prompt optimization-evolving only the system prompt via API calls-can serve as a practical alternative. We adapt 7 published methods and propose 5 education-specialized methods, evaluating these 12 methods under 5 conditions on 2 OOD benchmark suites. All 12 best-per-method configurations surpass the strongest RL-trained baseline (R_total = 0.633), and our ParetoGrad achieves the best Pareto balance across post-test solve rate, leak control, and helpfulness, rather than dominating any single component. Behavioral analysis with an 82-code educational codebook reveals that training-free methods rely on teaching-knowledge patterns at 2-3x the rate of RL-trained models, with a compensating ~10 percentage-point reduction in intent-level scaffolding. We also find a task-dependent reasoning mode effect consistent across training-free and RL-based paradigms. Our approach enables efficient development of pedagogically aligned LLM tutors with prompts alone and minimal compute.

Collaboration is central to human behavior, enabling tasks beyond individual capability. This ability arises from coordinating actions through internal representations of others, a concept known as shared intelligence. Additionally, humans are characterized by physical bodies and cognitive abilities that are optimized in response to their environment, a phenomenon referred to as embodied cognition. Designing humanoid robots that collaborate safely and effectively with people requires unifying these principles. Here we propose an architecture that integrates shared intelligence and embodied cognition to enable robots to physically collaborate with humans, where robot hardware and control are optimized for human metrics, using representations of the human body and motion intelligence. The ultimate goal is to achieve a form of shared embodied intelligence. Specifically, our architecture optimizes robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters with respect to human ergonomic metrics. This is accomplished by modeling human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models into the robot's physical intelligence. As a concrete implementation, we present the humanoid robot ergoCub, whose morphology and control have been optimized for collaborative tasks with humans. Our approach provides a framework for designing humanoid robots that prioritize human ergonomics at both the hardware and physical intelligence levels, with applications in industrial and assistive robotics.

Automated prompt optimization methods (e.g., DSpy, TextGrad) can substantially improve the performance of large language model (LLM), however, their generalization ability across different tasks remains underperformed. In practice, the superiority of the optimized prompt on one benchmark often fails to transfer to another, and this limitation persists even when switching across different LLM backbones. To investigate the underexplored sources of heterogeneity in prompt performance, we conduct a causal inference-inspired observational analysis of optimized prompts across a diverse set of optimization frameworks, LLM backbones, and NLP benchmarks. To achieve the goal, we build upon the propensity-adjusted associational analysis together with multiple complementary representations of prompt edits, where the consistent task-conditioned edits patterns are identified. We find that complexity-increasing and meta-instructional edits are negatively associated with mathematical and multi-hop reasoning performance, whereas step-by-step and meta-cognitive edits improve logical and sequential reasoning tasks. These effects are robust across cognitive-load annotations, surface-level text features, and edit-motif analyses, and can generalize across optimization frameworks. Overall, these results indicate that prompt optimization failures arise from systematic interactions between edit families and task characteristics rather than random optimization artifacts, providing feature-level characterization of optimizer behavior and motivating future task-conditioned optimizer design.

Harness optimization enables automated agent creation by having an optimizer agent iteratively update the harness of target agents. Despite its success, current studies evaluate optimizers solely by observing target agents' performance gains. This indirect end-improvement evaluation neglects optimizers' actions at intermediate steps, which are often erroneous and hinder agent performance. Therefore, it is unclear whether harness optimization is driven by optimizers' informed update actions or simply trial-and-error. This necessitates direct evaluation of harness optimizers. However, evaluating harness optimizers directly is non-trivial and costly due to the lack of oracle harnesses. To address this, we present a simple, low-cost design to directly evaluate them, namely priority ranking. By asking harness optimizers to rank components (e.g., tools) in a given harness by their potential to improve/hinder agent performance when updated, our design quantifies optimizer ability at the step level without expensive rollouts or manual examination. More importantly, optimizers' ranking performance correlates with their ability to improve agents in actual multi-step harness optimization, establishing priority ranking as a reliable predictor of optimization ability. Priority ranking is enabled by Shor, a collection of 182 human-verified optimization scenarios spanning across domains, designs, and time stages. Codes and data can be found at https://github.com/k59118/Harness_Optimizer_Evaluation.

Can a single LLM-based optimization system match specialized tools across fundamentally different domains? We show that when optimization problems are formulated as improving a text artifact evaluated by a scoring function, a single AI-based optimization system-supporting single-task search, multi-task search with cross-problem transfer, and generalization to unseen inputs-achieves state-of-the-art results across six diverse tasks. Our system discovers agent architectures that nearly triple Gemini Flash's ARC-AGI accuracy (32.5% to 89.5%), finds scheduling algorithms that cut cloud costs by 40%, generates CUDA kernels where 87% match or beat PyTorch, and outperforms AlphaEvolve's reported circle packing solution (n=26). Ablations across three domains reveal that actionable side information yields faster convergence and substantially higher final scores than score-only feedback, and that multi-task search outperforms independent optimization given equivalent per-problem budget through cross-task transfer, with benefits scaling with the number of related tasks. Together, we show for the first time that text optimization with LLM-based search is a general-purpose problem-solving paradigm, unifying tasks traditionally requiring domain-specific algorithms under a single framework. We open-source optimize_anything with support for multiple backends as part of the GEPA project at https://github.com/gepa-ai/gepa .

Optimization models developed by operations research (OR) experts are often deployed as decision-support systems in industrial settings. However, real-world environments are dynamic, with evolving business rules and unforeseen perturbations. In such contexts, end users should ideally re-optimize models to recover feasible and implementable solutions, often without access to the original model developers. This paper introduces an agentic re-optimization framework in which a large language model (LLM) acts as an OR expert, dynamically supporting end users through natural-language interaction. The LLM translates user prompts into structured updates of the underlying optimization model, selects suitable re-optimization techniques from an optimization toolbox, and solves the resulting instance to return implementable solutions. The toolbox leverages primal information, including historical solutions, valid inequalities, solver configurations, and metaheuristics, to accelerate re-optimization while preserving solution quality. The proposed framework enables interactive and continuous adaptation of deployed optimization models, reducing dependence on OR experts, and improving the sustainability of decision-support systems. Extensive experiments on two complementary large-scale real-world case studies demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed framework. The first considers online supply chain re-optimization, where solutions must be generated rapidly while remaining close to the deployed plan, whereas the second focuses on offline university exam scheduling, where solution quality is prioritized over runtime. Results show that the toolbox-driven architecture significantly improves computational efficiency through primal-based and solver-aware re-optimization techniques, while the structured patch-based updates improve interpretability and traceability of model modifications.

Prompt optimization has often been framed as a discrete search problem to find high-performing and robust instructions for a large language model (LLM). However, the search result might not make it transparent why and where specific prompt changes lead to performance gains. This is in contrast to how humans are instructed for annotation tasks. Here, researchers carefully design annotation guidelines, leading to enhanced annotation consistency. Our paper aims at joining these two approaches and introduces iPOE, a novel interpretable prompt optimization strategy via explanations. We guide the prompt optimization process by automatically created guidelines from explanations of annotation decisions (either automatically generated or from humans). This set of guidelines is furthermore optimized by a series of operations, including removing, adding, shuffling, and merging. The resulting prompt includes guidelines that instruct the annotation, making the decision process of the LLM and the optimization transparent. It therefore supports also laypeople in prompt optimization. In our experiments on four datasets, we find that iPOE can improve over the evaluated baselines by up to 39% and LLM explanations can replace human explanations in the proposed method. Moreover, our interpretability validation study demonstrates that humans and LLMs substantially agree on which guidelines contribute to their annotations, achieving a Cohen's kappa score between annotators and LLMs of up to 0.68, 0.80, and 0.95 for the emotion classification, medical fact-checking, and hate speech detection tasks respectively.

The advancement of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) has catalyzed a paradigm shift from reactive fast thinking'' text generation to systematic, step-by-step slow thinking'' reasoning, unlocking state-of-the-art performance in complex mathematical and logical tasks. However, the field faces \textit{the fundamental gap between token-level behavioral analysis and internal reasoning mechanisms, and the instability of reinforcement learning (RL) for reasoning optimization relying on costly external verifiers}. We identify and formally define \textbf{Entropy-Gradient Inversion}, a robust negative correlation between token entropy and logit gradients that acts as a definitive geometric fingerprint for LRM reasoning capability. Building on this, we propose \textbf{Correlation-Regularized Group Policy Optimization (CorR-PO)}, which embeds this inversion signature into RL reward regularization. Extensive experiments on various reasoning benchmarks across multiple model scales show CorR-PO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, confirming that stronger inversion directly correlates with superior reasoning performance.

End-to-end autonomous driving systems powered by Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance on common driving scenarios, yet remain brittle in rare but safety-critical long-tail situations such as active construction zones and complex yielding geometries. In this paper, we present a method that addresses the long-tail challenging scenes beyond data scaling and model training. We introduce CLAP (Contrastive Latent-space Prompt optimization), a location-aware adaptation framework that augments a frozen VLA driving model with per-roadblock soft prompts, optimized from crowdsourced data and retrieved on demand via Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication. Our approach rests on two observations from VLAs' latent space: (i) at the VLA's hidden-state layer, scenarios from the same roadblock cluster tightly and occupy compact regions of the latent space; and (ii) within a single roadblock, long-tail and normal frames are heavily intermixed in the latent representation, making it difficult to improve one without disturbing the other. CLAP addresses this via a two-stage pipeline: supervised contrastive learning to discover a roadblock-specific hard-scene direction, followed by directionally regularized prompt optimization that selectively improves challenging frames while preserving normal frame performance. On the NAVSIM benchmark with various state-of-the-art VLA backbones, CLAP reduces challenging scenario planning error by 24% with no regression on normal frames, significantly improving planning performance.

The physical resource block (PRB) allocation in Radio Access Networks (RANs) traditionally relies on case-by-case manual problem construction or, more recently, learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods. However, the sixth-generation (6G) RAN environments confront unprecedented service diversity and exponential dynamics, featuring volatile fluctuations in active base stations (BSs), user scale, and stringent Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements. Faced with such conditions, both manual models and standard AI algorithms remain fundamentally rigid, lacking the flexibility to adapt and self-evolve. To provide a one-size-fits-all solution, we propose treating the PRB allocation problem as an Optimization-as-a-Service (OaaS) provided by a large language model multi-agent (LLM-MA) system. This fundamentally reshapes RAN resource allocation by utilizing agents to dynamically construct optimization problems and automatically determine objectives tailored to real-time scenarios. Our closed-loop architecture, integrating scene understanding, objective generation, solver, and reflection agents, enables context-aware, self-correcting formulation. To eliminate the computational latency of iterative reflection, we introduce a one-shot reflection distillation mechanism, training a lightweight student model to directly predict refined objective parameters. We theoretically bound the performance gap of this one-shot policy. Experimental results demonstrate our framework achieves near-optimal resource allocation with ultra-low inference latency.

The choice of optimiser is important in deep learning, as it strongly influences model efficiency and speed of convergence. However, many commonly used optimisers encounter difficulties when applied to imbalanced and sequential datasets, limiting their ability to capture patterns of minority classes. In this study, we propose Dynamic Batch-Sensitive Adam (DBS-Adam), an optimiser that dynamically scales the learning rate using a batch difficulty score derived from exponential moving averages of gradient norms and batch loss. DBS-Adam improves training stability and accelerates convergence by increasing updates for difficult batches and reducing them for easier ones. We evaluate DBS-Adam by integrating it with Bi-Directional LSTM networks for accident injury severity prediction, addressing class imbalance through SMOTE-ENN resampling and Focal Loss. Four experimental configurations compare baseline Bi-LSTM models and alternative architectures to assess optimiser impact. Rigorous comparison against state-of-the-art optimisers (AMSGrad, AdamW, AdaBound) across five random seeds demonstrated DBS-Adam's competitive performance with statistically significant precision improvements (p=0.020). Results indicate that DBS-Adam outperforms standard optimisation approaches, achieving 95.22% test accuracy, 96.11% precision, 95.28% recall, 95.39% F1-score, and a test loss of 0.0086. The proposed framework enables effective real-time accident severity classification for targeted emergency response and road safety interventions, demonstrating the value of DBS-Adam for learning from imbalanced sequential data.

Prompt engineering is crucial for effective interaction with generative artificial intelligence systems, yet existing optimisation methods often operate over an unstructured and vast prompt space, leading to high computational costs and potential distortions of the original intent. We introduce Prompt Segmentation and Annotation Optimisation (PSAO), a structured prompt optimisation framework designed to improve prompt optimisation controllability and efficiency. PSAO decomposes a prompt into interpretable segments (e.g., sentences) and augments each with human-readable annotations (e.g., {not important}, {important}, {very important}). These annotations guide large language models (LLMs) in allocating focus and clarifying confusion during response generation. We formally define the segmentations and annotations and demonstrate that optimised segment-level annotations can lead to improved LLM responses, with the original prompt retained as a candidate in the optimisation space to prevent performance degradation. Empirical evaluations indicate that PSAO benefits from annotations in terms of improved reasoning accuracy and self-consistency. However, developing efficient methods for identifying optimal segmentations and annotations remains challenging and is reserved for future investigation. This work is intended as a proof of concept, demonstrating the feasibility and potential of segment-level annotation optimisation.

Agentic evolution has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving programs, workflows, and scientific solutions by iteratively generating candidates, evaluating them, and using feedback to guide future search. However, existing methods are typically instantiated either as fixed hand-designed procedures that are modular but rigid, or as general-purpose agents that flexibly integrate feedback but can drift in long-horizon evolution. Both forms accumulate rich evidence over time, including candidates, feedback, traces, and failures, yet lack a stable interface for organizing this evidence and revising the mechanism that drives future evolution. We address this limitation by formulating agentic evolution as an interactive environment, where the accumulated evolution context serves as a process-level state. We introduce AEvo, a harnessed meta-editing framework in which a meta-agent observes this state and acts not by directly proposing the next candidate, but by editing the procedure or agent context that controls future evolution. This unified interface enables AEvo to steer both procedure-based and agent-based evolution, making accumulated evidence actionable for long-horizon search. Empirical evaluations on agentic and reasoning benchmarks show that AEvo outperforms five evolution baselines, achieving a 26 relative improvement over the strongest baseline. Across three open-ended optimization tasks, AEvo further outperforms four evolution baselines and achieves state-of-the-art performance under the same iteration budget.

LLM-based multi-agent systems have demonstrated strong performance across complex real-world tasks, such as software engineering, predictive modeling, and retrieval-augmented generation. Yet automating their configuration remains a structural challenge, as scores are available only at the system level, whereas the parameters governing agent behavior are local. We argue that optimizing these systems is fundamentally a credit-assignment problem. We therefore introduce CANTANTE, a framework that decomposes system-level rewards into per-agent update signals by contrasting rollouts of multiple joint configurations on the same query. We instantiate it for prompt optimization, treating agent prompts as learnable system parameters. We evaluate CANTANTE against GEPA and MIPROv2 on programming (MBPP), mathematical reasoning (GSM8K), and multi-hop question answering (HotpotQA). Across these benchmarks, CANTANTE achieves the best average rank among all evaluated optimizers and consistently outperforms unoptimized prompts. It improves over the strongest baseline by +18.9 percentage points on MBPP and +12.5 percentage points on GSM8K, while incurring a lower inference cost. It remains within one standard deviation of the strongest baseline on HotpotQA. Crucially, our credit correlation analysis confirms that the attributer produces meaningful per-agent signals rather than echoing the global system score.

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for in-context learning on structured data, enabling direct prediction on new tabular tasks without task-specific training. However, their effectiveness is constrained by context length limits, restricting application to medium-scale data and degrading performance when inference-time data exceed pretraining size distributions. Our work introduces VIP-COP, estimating the Value of Importance for Prediction of training examples and features for hard Context OPtimization for TFMs. Its explicit selection mechanism suppresses noise and isolates influential data, enabling the model to also benefit from data augmentation by prioritizing high-value augmented samples and features. VIP-COP is (i) fast, boosting performance often within minutes of optimization, based on an online KernelSHAP-based regression with iterative refinement, value-guided context sampling, and multi-fidelity pruning; (ii) budget-aware and any-time, improving with additional test-time compute unlike heuristics that produce fixed contexts; (iii) model-aware yet fully black-box, requiring no access to model internals, making it compatible with both proprietary and open-source TFMs; (iv) interpretable, identifying discrete ``Very Important Predictors'' (samples and features) that maximize signal-to-noise, which makes it (v) robust, isolating high-value data from noise. In contrast, soft-prompt optimization requires model gradients, produces abstract latent tokens, and lacks explicit signal discrimination. Extensive experiments show that VIP-COP consistently outperforms heuristic and optimized baselines across large-scale high-dimensional testbeds, including data augmentation and data-noise settings, establishing a new state of the art in test-time context refinement for TFMs.

LLM coding agents now generate code at an unprecedented scale, yet LLM-generated code introduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities into codebases without human involvement. Even when frontier models are explicitly asked to write secure production code with relevant weaknesses to avoid in context, we find that they still produce verifiable vulnerabilities on average 23% of the time across a corpus of 250 benign coding prompts. We introduce SecureForge, an automated pipeline that both audits security risks of frontier models and produces auditing-informed secure system prompts that reduce output security vulnerabilities while maintaining unit test performance. SecureForge first identifies benign prompts that produce statically detectable vulnerabilities, and then amplifies them into a large synthetic prompt corpus of diverse scenarios using a Markovian sampling technique to jointly maintain error rates and prompt diversity. This corpus is then used to iteratively optimize the system prompts to reduce output security vulnerabilities. On frontier models, SecureForge yields a statistically significant Pareto improvement in both unit test success and output security, with output vulnerabilities reduced by up to 48%. The resulting system prompts transfer zero-shot to in-the-wild coding agent prompts, without any exposure to real user prompt distributions during optimization.

Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) are a core component of next-generation intelligent recommender systems because they enable users to actively elicit preferences, clarify intentions, and adapt recommendations in real time. However, there are two key obstacles in the CRS domain: evaluation and access to training data. Evaluating CRSs through real human studies is more critical than for traditional recommender systems, yet such studies are both costly and time-consuming. Moreover, CRS interaction data are often difficult to obtain for model training due to privacy concerns. Large language model (LLM)-based user simulators have shown promise in addressing both challenges by generating synthetic user interactions for evaluation and training. However, existing approaches suffer from systematic positive bias, data leakage, and limited behavioral diversity, and they rely on brittle manual prompt engineering that requires extensive domain expertise. In this paper, we propose a framework to automatically optimize prompts for LLM-based user simulators in CRSs, simultaneously mitigating these issues. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves improved behavioral alignment with human interaction patterns compared to baseline methods across diverse prompt settings.

We rethink Federated Learning (FL) from a nested learning perspective, framing the core challenge as how to collaboratively learn optimization rules, not just static models, to tackle Non-IID client data. To address this, we propose Federated Nested Learning (FedNL), a novel framework that reformulates FL as a three-level nested optimization system. FedNL embeds Titans-based linear attention into FL, enabling clients to perform lightweight, zero-shot test-time adaptation by treating a delta rule as an online gradient step. Experiments on Non-IID MMLU and long-context benchmarks show that FedNL achieves competitive performance in short-context reasoning, enhances the performance of long-context retrieval and streaming Cross-Entropy, and maintains constant inference memory.

Black-box optimization in science and engineering often comes with side information: experts, simulators, pretrained predictors, or heuristics can suggest which candidates look promising. This information can accelerate search, but it can also be biased, input-dependent, or misleading. Feedback-aware BO methods typically handle one task at a time, limiting their ability to generalize over multiple sources of feedback. In-context optimizers address cross-task adaptation, but usually assume that optimization history is the only available signal at test time. We study feedback-informed in-context black-box optimization (FICBO), where a pretrained optimizer conditions on both the observed history and cheap auxiliary feedback for the current candidate set. We introduce a structured feedback prior that models how feedback sources vary in their access, relevance, and distortion relative to the true objective, and use it to pretrain a feedback-aware transformer. At test time, the model estimates source reliability in context by comparing observed objective values with auxiliary signals, improving query selection. On synthetic and real-world tasks, FICBO effectively exploits informative feedback while remaining robust to weak or misleading sources, improving over other baselines. Empirical investigations further illustrate how the model perceives test-time sources, offering insights into its interpretability and decision-making process.

The optimisation of fed-batch (bio)chemical process recipes is subject to inherent, underlying, and unmeasurable fluctuations across batches, whose trajectories are difficult to model and costly to measure. Bayesian Optimisation (BayesOpt) is a powerful tool for sampling and optimisation of expensive-to-measure functions. Gaussian Processes (GPs), the surrogate models used in BayesOpt, are static, forecast poorly, and lack generalisation across experiments, limiting their applicability to time-varying batch processes with stochastic parameters, i.e., process fluctuations. This work investigates System-Aware Neural ODE Processes (SANODEP) as a meta-learning model to overcome the limitations of GPs and increase few-shot optimisation performance in BayesOpt. Using a penicillin batch production case study, we find that SANODEP outperforms GP-based BayesOpt in the low-data regime, resulting in improved objectives when few experimental runs are performed. These improvements are observed in both on- and off-distribution batches, highlighting the generalisation capabilities of SANODEP. Using this approach, batch process operators can accelerate the initial optimisation steps in BayesOpt by deploying meta-learning or optimise the process with fewer experiments when the experimental cost is high.

Vision-language models such as CLIP achieve strong visual-textual alignment, but often suffer from overfitting and limited interpretability when adapted through continuous prompt learning. While discrete prompt optimization improves interpretability, it usually depends on large external models, leading to high computational costs and limited scalability. In this paper, we propose Interpretable Prompt Learning (IPL), a hybrid framework that alternates between discrete semantic token selection and continuous prompt optimization. Specifically, IPL formulates semantic token selection as an approximate submodular optimization problem, encouraging tokens that are both human-understandable and semantically diverse. It further adopts an alternating optimization strategy to integrate discrete token selection with continuous prompt tuning, improving interpretability while preserving adaptability to downstream tasks. Our framework is plug-and-play, allowing seamless integration with existing prompt learning methods. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that IPL consistently improves both interpretability and accuracy across five representative prompt learning methods, providing an effective and scalable extension to existing frameworks.

We consider function optimization as a sequential decision making problem under budget constraint. This constraint limits the number of objective function evaluations allowed during the optimization. We consider an algorithm inspired by a continuous version of a multi-armed bandit problem which attacks this optimization problem by solving the tradeoff between exploration (initial quasi-uniform search of the domain) and exploitation (local optimization around the potentially global maxima). We introduce the so-called Simultaneous Optimistic Optimization (SOO), a deterministic algorithm that works by domain partitioning. The benefit of such approach are the guarantees on the returned solution and the numerical efficiency of the algorithm. We present this machine learning approach to optimization, and provide the empirical assessment of SOO on the CEC'2014 competition on single objective real-parameter numerical optimization test-suite.

Foundation models, particularly large language models, are increasingly integrated into agent architectures for industrial tasks such as decision support, process monitoring, and engineering automation. Yet evidence on their purposes, capabilities, and limitations remains fragmented across domains. This work examines how mature foundation-model-based agent systems are in industrial contexts, how their functional profile differs from conventional agent systems, and which limitations persist. A systematic literature survey following the PRISMA 2020 guideline is presented, screening 2,341 publications and synthesising a corpus of 88 publications through a structured coding scheme. The results show that reported systems are predominantly at prototype and early validation stages (75.0% at TRL 4-6), with deployment-oriented evidence remaining rare (9.1%). Operational goals are most frequently positioned in user assistance, monitoring, and process optimisation, while conventional production-control purposes such as planning and scheduling are less prominent. Compared with an established baseline for industrial agent systems, the capability profile reveals substantial gains in human interaction (+37%) and dealing with uncertainty (+35%), but a pronounced deficit in negotiation (-39%). The most widely reported limitations concern lack of generalization, hallucination and output instability, data scarcity, and inference latency. A working definition of foundation-model-based industrial agents is also proposed, bridging conventional agent theory, automation-engineering standards, and the foundation-model paradigm.

Bayesian optimization is a sequential method for minimizing objective functions that are expensive to evaluate and about which few assumptions can be made. By using all gathered data to train a Gaussian process model for the function and adaptively employing a mixture of global exploration and local exploitation, this method has been used for optimization in many fields including machine learning, automotive engineering and reinforcement learning. However, the standard method suffers from two problems: 1) with cubic computational complexity in the training-set size it eventually becomes computationally infeasible to train the model, and 2) globally modeling the objective function is not necessarily optimal given the local nature of minimization. Using flexible and recursive binary partitioning of the search space, we adapt both the modeling and acquisitive aspects of standard Bayesian optimization to work harmoniously with the partitioning scheme, thereby ameliorating both standard shortcomings. We compare our method against a commonly used Bayesian optimization library on seven challenging test functions, ranging in dimensionality from $6$ to $124$, and show that our method achieves superior optimization performance in all tests. In addition our method has linear computational complexity.

Current Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation frameworks utilize the same static prompt template across all models under evaluation. This differs from the common industry practice of using prompt optimization (PO) techniques to optimize the prompt for each model to maximize application performance. In this paper, we investigate the effect of PO towards LLM evaluations. Our results on public academic and internal industry benchmarks show that PO greatly affects the final ranking of models. This highlights the importance of practitioners performing PO per model when conducting evaluations to choose the best model for a given task.

Tool-calling agents are evaluated on tool selection, parameter accuracy, and scope recognition, yet LLM trajectory assessments remain inherently post-hoc. Disconnected from the active execution loop, such assessments identify errors that are usually addressed through prompt-tuning or retraining, and fundamentally cannot course-correct the agent in real time. To close this gap, we move evaluation into the execution loop at inference time: a specialized reviewer agent evaluates provisional tool calls prior to execution, shifting the paradigm from post-hoc recovery to proactive evaluation and error mitigation. In practice, this architecture establishes a clear separation of concerns between the primary execution agent and a secondary review agent. As with any multi-agent system, the reviewer can introduce new errors while correcting others, yet no prior work to our knowledge has systematically measured this tradeoff. To quantify this tradeoff, we introduce Helpfulness-Harmfulness metrics: helpfulness measures the percentage of base agent errors that feedback corrects; harmfulness measures the percentage of correct responses that feedback degrades. These metrics directly inform reviewer design by revealing whether a given model or prompt provides net positive value. We evaluate our approach on BFCL (single-turn) and Tau2-Bench (multi-turn stateful scenarios), achieving +5.5% on irrelevance detection and +7.1% on multi-turn tasks. Our metrics reveal that reviewer model choice is critical: the reasoning model o3-mini achieves a 3:1 benefit-to-risk ratio versus 2.1:1 for GPT-4o. Automated prompt optimization via GEPA provides an additional +1.5-2.8%. Together, these results demonstrate a core advantage of separating execution and review: the reviewer can be systematically improved through model selection and prompt optimization, without retraining the base agent.

Optimization problems are fundamental in diverse fields, such as engineering, economics, and scientific computing. However, current algorithms are mostly designed for specific problem types and exhibit limited generality in solving multiple types of optimization problems. To enhance generality, we propose an automated reduction method named OP-to-MaxSAT reduction and a general optimization solver based on OP-to-MaxSAT reduction (GORED). GORED unifies the solving of multiple types of optimization problems by reducing the problems from optimization problems to MaxSAT instances in polynomial time and solving them using the state-of-the-art MaxSAT solver. The generality and solution quality of GORED are validated through experiments on 136 instances across 11 types of optimization problems. Experimental results demonstrate that GORED not only successfully solves a wide range of optimization problems but also yields solutions comparable in quality to those from existing methods, with no statistically significant differences observed. By introducing automated reduction, this work shifts the paradigm of optimization solvers from designing specialized algorithms for each problem type to employing a single algorithm for diverse problems. As a result, advances in this single algorithm can now drive progress in a wide range of optimization problems across various domains.

As LLMs reduce English-centric bias, a surprising trend emerges: non-English responses sometimes outperform English on reasoning tasks. We hypothesize that language functions as a latent variable that structurally modulates the model's internal inference pathways, rather than merely serving as an output medium. To test this, we conducted a Polyglot Thinking Experiment, in which models were prompted to solve identical problems under language-constrained and language-unconstrained conditions. Results show that non-English responses often achieve higher accuracy, and the best performance frequently occur when language is unconstrained, suggesting that multilinguality broadens the model's latent reasoning space. Based on this insight, we propose polyGRPO (Polyglot Group Relative Policy Optimization), an RL framework that treats language variation as an implicit exploration signal. It generates polyglot preference data online under language-constrained and unconstrained conditions, optimizing the policy with respect to both answer accuracy and reasoning structure. Trained on only 18.1K multilingual math problems without chain-of-thought annotations, polyGRPO improves the base model (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct) by 6.72% absolute accuracy on four English reasoning testset and 6.89% in their multilingual benchmark. Remarkably, it is the only method that surpasses the base LLM on English commonsense reasoning task (4.9%), despite being trained solely on math data-highlighting its strong cross-task generalization. Further analysis reveals that treating language as a latent variable expands the model's latent reasoning space, yielding consistent and generalizable improvements in reasoning performance.

The integration of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for constrained decision-making and adaptive control. MPC offers structured optimization, explicit constraint handling, and established stability tools, whereas RL provides data-driven adaptation and performance improvement in the presence of uncertainty and model mismatch. Despite the rapid growth of research on RL--MPC integration, the literature remains fragmented, particularly for control architectures built on linear or linearized predictive models. This paper presents a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of RL--MPC integrations for linear and linearized systems, covering peer-reviewed and formally indexed studies published until 2025. The reviewed studies are organized through a multi-dimensional taxonomy covering RL functional roles, RL algorithm classes, MPC formulations, cost-function structures, and application domains. In addition, a cross-dimensional synthesis is conducted to identify recurring design patterns and reported associations among these dimensions within the reviewed corpus. The review highlights methodological trends, commonly adopted integration strategies, and recurring practical challenges, including computational burden, sample efficiency, robustness, and closed-loop guarantees. The resulting synthesis provides a structured reference for researchers and practitioners seeking to design or analyze RL--MPC architectures based on linear or linearized predictive control formulations.

This work explores the role of prompt design and judge selection in LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations of free text legal question answering. We examine whether automatic task prompt optimization improves over human-centered design, whether optimization effectiveness varies by judge feedback style, and whether optimized prompts transfer across judges. We systematically address these questions on the LEXam benchmark by optimizing task prompts using the ProTeGi method with feedback from two judges (Qwen3-32B, DeepSeek-V3) across four task models, and then testing cross-judge transfer. Automatic optimization consistently outperforms the baseline, with lenient judge feedback yielding higher and more consistent gains than strict judge feedback. Prompts optimized with lenient feedback transfer better to strict judges than the reverse direction. Analysis reveals that lenient judges provide permissive feedback, yielding prompts with broader applicability, whereas strict judges produce restrictive feedback, leading to judge-specific overfitting. Our findings demonstrate algorithmically optimizing prompts on training data can outperform human-centered prompt design and that judges' dispositions during optimization shape prompt generalizability.

Designing and optimizing multi-agent systems (MAS) is a complex, labor-intensive process of "Agent Engineering." Existing automatic optimization methods, primarily focused on flat prompt tuning, lack the structural awareness to debug the intricate web of interactions in MAS. More critically, these optimizers are static; they do not learn from experience to improve their own optimization strategies. To address these gaps, we introduce Textual Parameter Graph Optimization (TPGO), a framework that enables a multi-agent system to learn to evolve. TPGO first models the MAS as a Textual Parameter Graph (TPG), where agents, tools, and workflows are modular, optimizable nodes. To guide evolution, we derive "textual gradients," structured natural language feedback from execution traces, to pinpoint failures and suggest granular modifications. The core of our framework is Group Relative Agent Optimization (GRAO), a novel meta-learning strategy that learns from historical optimization experiences. By analyzing past successes and failures, GRAO becomes progressively better at proposing effective updates, allowing the system to learn how to optimize itself. Extensive experiments on complex benchmarks like GAIA and MCP-Universe show that TPGO significantly enhances the performance of state-of-the-art agent frameworks, achieving higher success rates through automated, self-improving optimization.

Named Entity Recognition (NER) models trained on clean, high-resource corpora exhibit catastrophic performance collapse when deployed on noisy, sparse User-Generated Content (UGC), such as social media. Prior research has predominantly focused on point-wise symptom remediation -- employing customized fine-tuning to address issues like neologisms, alias drift, non-standard orthography, long-tail entities, and class imbalance. However, these improvements often fail to generalize because they overlook the structural sparsity inherent in UGC. This study reveals that surface-level noise symptoms share a unified root cause: low Information Density (ID). Through hierarchical confounding-controlled resampling experiments (specifically controlling for entity rarity and annotation consistency), this paper identifies ID as an independent key factor. We introduce Attention Spectrum Analysis (ASA) to quantify how reduced ID causally leads to ``attention blunting,'' ultimately degrading NER performance. Informed by these mechanistic insights, we propose the Window-Aware Optimization Module (WOM), an LLM-empowered, model-agnostic framework. WOM identifies information-sparse regions and utilizes selective back-translation to directionally enhance semantic density without altering model architecture. Deployed atop mainstream architectures on standard UGC datasets (WNUT2017, Twitter-NER, WNUT2016), WOM yields up to 4.5% absolute F1 improvement, demonstrating robustness and achieving new state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on WNUT2017.

Prompt optimization methods either analyze individual failures in isolation or compare prompt variants across examples, operating on single execution traces with no access to the reasoning process distinguishing success from failure on the same input. We introduce ContraPrompt, built on the observation that when a model fails but succeeds on a retry with feedback, the difference between its two chain-of-thought traces constitutes an optimization signal not captured by prior methods. Unlike prior contrastive methods, we compare complete intermediate reasoning processes: the two traces share model, input, and base prompt, so remaining differences reflect reasoning strategy and appended error feedback -- we call this dyadic reasoning trace analysis. The multi-attempt solving phase is an instrumented agentic retry loop that generates contrastive data automatically without human annotation. Extracted rules are organized into an input-aware decision tree routing instructions by observable input characteristics. On four reasoning and compliance benchmarks, ContraPrompt outperforms GEPA (Agrawal et al., 2026) on all four, with absolute gains of +8.29 pp on HotPotQA (+20.8% rel.), +2.21 pp on GDPR-Bench (+18.2% rel.), +7.14 pp on GPQA Diamond (+10.6% rel.), and +0.74 pp on BBH (+0.85% rel.). Ablations confirm dyadic trace contrastivity is the critical component, with a -16% relative average drop upon its removal. On 53 EvalSet black-box optimization problems, ContraPrompt beats GEPA on 11, ties on 41, and loses on 1 at equal budget. On FiNER-139 financial named entity recognition (Loukas et al., 2022), ContraPrompt achieves +7.77 pp over the unoptimized baseline (+11.6% rel.) and +1.94 pp over GEPA (+2.66% rel.), with branch conditions aligning with standard US GAAP financial-instrument categories.

LLM agents in markets present algorithmic collusion risks. While prior work shows LLM agents reach supracompetitive prices through tacit coordination, existing research focuses on hand-crafted prompts. The emerging paradigm of prompt optimization necessitates new methodologies for understanding autonomous agent behavior. We investigate whether prompt optimization leads to emergent collusive behaviors in market simulations. We propose a meta-learning loop where LLM agents participate in duopoly markets and an LLM meta-optimizer iteratively refines shared strategic guidance. Our experiments reveal that meta-prompt optimization enables agents to discover stable tacit collusion strategies with substantially improved coordination quality compared to baseline agents. These behaviors generalize to held-out test markets, indicating discovery of general coordination principles. Analysis of evolved prompts reveals systematic coordination mechanisms through stable shared strategies. Our findings call for further investigation into AI safety implications in autonomous multi-agent systems.

Recent advances in query optimization have shifted from traditional rule-based and cost-based techniques towards machine learning-driven approaches. Among these, reinforcement learning (RL) has attracted significant attention due to its ability to optimize long-term performance by learning policies over query planning. However, existing RL-based query optimizers often exhibit unstable performance at the level of individual queries, including severe performance regressions, and require prolonged training to reach the plan quality of expert, cost-based optimizers. These shortcomings make learned query optimizers difficult to deploy in practice and remain a major barrier to their adoption in production database systems. To address these challenges, we present RELOAD, a robust and efficient learned query optimizer for database systems. RELOAD focuses on (i) robustness, by minimizing query-level performance regressions and ensuring consistent optimization behavior across executions, and (ii) efficiency, by accelerating convergence to expert-level plan quality. Through extensive experiments on standard benchmarks, including Join Order Benchmark, TPC-DS, and Star Schema Benchmark, RELOAD demonstrates up to 2.4x higher robustness and 3.1x greater efficiency compared to state-of-the-art RL-based query optimization techniques.

Prompt optimization in compound AI systems is statistically indistinguishable from a coin flip: across 72 optimization runs on Claude Haiku 4.5 (6 methods $\times$ 4 tasks $\times$ 3 repeats), 49% score below zero-shot; on Amazon Nova Lite, the failure rate is even higher. Yet on one task, all six methods improve over zero-shot by up to $+6.8$ points. What distinguishes success from failure? We investigate with 18,000 grid evaluations and 144 optimization runs, testing two assumptions behind end-to-end optimization tools like TextGrad and DSPy, in the order they must be answered: (A) agent prompts interact, requiring joint rather than independent optimization, and (B) individual prompts are worth optimizing at all. Interaction effects are never significant ($p > 0.52$, all $F < 1.0$), and optimization helps only when the task has exploitable output structure: a format the model can produce but does not default to. We further give a mechanistic account: instruction-tuning compresses input phrasing into a narrow output distribution, eliminating the very phrasing-sensitivity that joint optimization assumes. We provide a two-stage diagnostic: an $80 ANOVA pre-test for agent coupling, and a 10-minute headroom test that predicts whether optimization is worthwhile, turning a coin flip into an informed decision.

Prompting schemes such as Chain of Thought, Tree of Thoughts, and Graph of Thoughts can significantly enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, most existing schemes require users to define static, problem-specific reasoning structures that lack adaptability to dynamic or unseen problem types. Additionally, these schemes are often under-optimized in terms of hyperparameters, prompts, runtime, and prompting cost. To address these limitations, we introduce Framework of Thoughts (FoT)--a general-purpose foundation framework for building and optimizing dynamic reasoning schemes. FoT comes with built-in features for hyperparameter tuning, prompt optimization, parallel execution, and intelligent caching, unlocking the latent performance potential of reasoning schemes. We demonstrate FoT's capabilities by implementing three popular schemes--Tree of Thoughts, Graph of Thoughts, and ProbTree--within FoT. We empirically show that FoT enables significantly faster execution, reduces costs, and achieves better task scores through optimization. We release our codebase to facilitate the development of future dynamic and efficient reasoning schemes.

As a pioneer of the third-generation photovoltaic revolution, Perovskite Solar Cells (PSCs) are renowned for their superior optoelectronic performance and cost potential. The development process of PSCs is precise and complex, involving a series of closed-loop workflows such as literature retrieval, data integration, experimental design, and synthesis. However, existing AI perovskite approaches focus predominantly on discrete models, including material design, process optimization,and property prediction. These models fail to propagate physical constraints across the workflow, hindering end-to-end optimization. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent system for perovskite material discovery, named PeroMAS. We first encapsulated a series of perovskite-specific tools into Model Context Protocols (MCPs). By planning and invoking these tools, PeroMAS can design perovskite materials under multi-objective constraints, covering the entire process from literature retrieval and data extraction to property prediction and mechanism analysis. Furthermore, we construct an evaluation benchmark by perovskite human experts to assess this multi-agent system. Results demonstrate that, compared to single Large Language Model (LLM) or traditional search strategies, our system significantly enhances discovery efficiency. It successfully identified candidate materials satisfying multi-objective constraints. Notably, we verify PeroMAS's effectiveness in the physical world through real synthesis experiments.

We study the running time, in terms of first order oracle queries, of differentially private empirical/population risk minimization of Lipschitz convex losses. We first consider the setting where the loss is non-smooth and the optimizer interacts with a private proxy oracle, which sends only private messages about a minibatch of gradients. In this setting, we show that expected running time $Ω(\min\{\frac{\sqrt{d}}{α^2}, \frac{d}{\log(1/α)}\})$ is necessary to achieve $α$ excess risk on problems of dimension $d$ when $d \geq 1/α^2$. Upper bounds via DP-SGD show these results are tight when $d>\tildeΩ(1/α^4)$. We further show our lower bound can be strengthened to $Ω(\min\{\frac{d}{\bar{m}α^2}, \frac{d}{\log(1/α)} \})$ for algorithms which use minibatches of size at most $\bar{m} < \sqrt{d}$. We next consider smooth losses, where we relax the private oracle assumption and give lower bounds under only the condition that the optimizer is private. Here, we lower bound the expected number of first order oracle calls by $\tildeΩ\big(\frac{\sqrt{d}}α + \min\{\frac{1}{α^2}, n\}\big)$, where $n$ is the size of the dataset. Modifications to existing algorithms show this bound is nearly tight. Compared to non-private lower bounds, our results show that differentially private optimizers pay a dimension dependent runtime penalty. Finally, as a natural extension of our proof technique, we show lower bounds in the non-smooth setting for optimizers interacting with information limited oracles. Specifically, if the proxy oracle transmits at most $Γ$-bits of information about the gradients in the minibatch, then $Ω\big(\min\{\frac{d}{α^2Γ}, \frac{d}{\log(1/α)}\}\big)$ oracle calls are needed. This result shows fundamental limitations of gradient quantization techniques in optimization.

Recently, several instances of non-Euclidean SGD, including SignSGD, Lion, and Muon, have attracted significant interest from the optimization community due to their practical success in training deep neural networks. Consequently, a number of works have attempted to explain this success by developing theoretical convergence analyses. Unfortunately, these results cannot properly justify the superior performance of these methods, as they could not beat the convergence rate of vanilla Euclidean SGD. We resolve this important open problem by developing a new unified convergence analysis under the structured smoothness and gradient noise assumption. In particular, our results indicate that non-Euclidean SGD (i) can exploit the sparsity or low-rank structure of the upper bounds on the Hessian and gradient noise, (ii) can provably benefit from popular algorithmic tools such as extrapolation or momentum variance reduction, and (iii) can match the state-of-the-art convergence rates of adaptive and more complex optimization algorithms such as AdaGrad and Shampoo.

We propose Camera Splatting, a novel view optimization framework for novel view synthesis. Each camera is modeled as a 3D Gaussian, referred to as a camera splat, and virtual cameras, termed point cameras, are placed at 3D points sampled near the surface to observe the distribution of camera splats. View optimization is achieved by continuously and differentiably refining the camera splats so that desirable target distributions are observed from the point cameras, in a manner similar to the original 3D Gaussian splatting. Compared to the Farthest View Sampling (FVS) approach, our optimized views demonstrate superior performance in capturing complex view-dependent phenomena, including intense metallic reflections and intricate textures such as text.

General chemical reaction conditions that achieve consistently high performance across multiple substrates are important for practical applications such as library synthesis and high-throughput experimentation. However, identifying such conditions efficiently has been a longstanding challenge, as it requires decision making under uncertainty with respect to both conditions and substrates, while minimizing the number of required experiments. Here, we introduce CurryBO, a high-level framework for generality-oriented optimization. By formalizing the problem as Bayesian optimization over curried functions, CurryBO provides a unified framework that accommodates different generality definitions (e.g., mean yield across substrates), and supports a range of substrate and condition selection strategies. We evaluate this framework on four benchmark tasks in experimental reaction optimization, and systematically analyze key algorithmic components. Our results show that efficient experiment planning can be achieved by emphasizing exploration when selecting reaction conditions, followed by the uncertainty-guided prioritization of substrates in a sequential decison-making scheme. Based on these insights, we design and validate an optimization policy that substantially improves sample efficiency relative to previously reported approaches across all benchmarks. Overall, the flexibility and modularity of CurryBO facilitate the integration of generality-oriented optimization into experimental settings, enabling more efficient identification of solutions that perform robustly across diverse tasks.

We study differentially private optimization with matrix-orthogonalized momentum. DP-Muon uses conventional global per-example clipping and one Gaussian gradient release per step; matrix updates and auxiliary updates are post-processing. Our main contribution concerns the additional mean distortion created when fresh Gaussian noise passes through a nonlinear matrix map. Conditioning on the actual adaptive history immediately before the current noise yields an exact Gaussian heat identity. For a smooth Newton-Schulz map, first-order DP-MuonBC reduces this conditional output bias from second to fourth order in the fresh noise scale, and an arbitrary-order extension has bias of order $2K+2$. We prove matrix-block stationarity bounds under global clipping, retain finite-step orthogonalization error explicitly, and give an exact criterion for improvement of the resulting upper bound. A separate inequality exposes the effect of auxiliary Adam updates. GPT-2 experiments on E2E at four privacy targets favor the reported Muon configurations over Adam baselines in test NLL.