Chest X-Ray

The heightened prevalence of respiratory disorders, particularly exacerbated by a significant upswing in fatalities due to the novel coronavirus, underscores the critical need for early detection and timely intervention. This imperative is paramount, possessing the potential to profoundly impact and safeguard numerous lives. Medically, chest radiography stands out as an essential and economically viable medical imaging approach for diagnosing and assessing the severity of diverse Respiratory Disorders. However, their detection in Chest X-Rays is a cumbersome task even for well-trained radiologists owing to low contrast issues, overlapping of the tissue structures, subjective variability, and the presence of noise. To address these issues, a novel analytical model termed Exponential Pixelating Integral is introduced for the automatic detection of infections in Chest X-Rays in this work. Initially, the presented Exponential Pixelating Integral enhances the pixel intensities to overcome the low-contrast issues that are then polar-transformed followed by their representation using the locally invariant Mandelbrot and Julia fractal geometries for effective distinction of structural features. The collated features labeled Exponential Pixelating Integral with dually characterized fractal features are then classified by the non-parametric multivariate adaptive regression splines to establish an ensemble model between each pair of classes for effective diagnosis of diverse diseases. Rigorous analysis of the proposed classification framework on large medical benchmarked datasets showcases its superiority over its peers by registering a higher classification accuracy and F1 scores ranging from 98.46 to 99.45% and 96.53-98.10% respectively, making it a precise and interpretable automated system for diagnosing respiratory disorders.

Reconstructing volumetric Computed Tomography (CT) from a single 2D chest radiograph (CXR) is an ill-posed inverse problem, further complicated by the scarcity of paired CXR-CT training data. Prior approaches address this by training on Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs), which are synthetic projections derived from CT volumes. However, the domain gap between DRRs and real CXRs limits generalization, often resulting in coarse or anatomically inconsistent reconstructions when applied to clinical images. To address this challenging problem, this study introduces a Multi-Pass Multi-View Blended Learning framework for synthesizing high-fidelity volumetric CT directly from real chest X-ray (CXR) images. The proposed approach progressively decomposes the synthesis task into two distinct, complementary learning stages. Stage 1 is an unsupervised CXR-to-DRR Domain Adaptation, while Stage 2 includes three passes, namely, (a) supervised DRR-to-CT Transformation, (b) unsupervised Multi-View Slice Refinement, followed by (c) Progressive Transfer Learning (PTL). With such a blended learning paradigm, the proposed approach mitigates the synthetic-to-real domain gap while enhancing both the structural integrity and anatomical detail of the final output. On the LIDC-IDRI dataset, where paired DRR-CT ground truth is available for quantitative evaluation, the proposed method improves upon prior methods by up to 14% in PSNR and 7.6% in SSIM. The framework successfully generates structurally consistent and anatomically realistic high-fidelity CT volumes from real CXRs, marking a significant advancement toward clinical viability of CT reconstruction from standard radiographic images.

Recent radiology multi-modal language models have made substantial progress in chest X-ray report generation, visual question answering, and temporal reasoning. While longitudinal chest X-ray interpretation compares sequential examinations to describe change, visual grounding aims to connect clinical language with localized image evidence. Although longitudinal modeling and visual grounding have each advanced radiology language models, how localized visual evidence can support longitudinal interpretation remains under-explored. We introduce CheXGround, a region-grounded longitudinal chest X-ray language model that represents paired studies through corresponding anatomical regions. CheXGround extracts anatomical regions from current and prior radiographs, encodes them as temporally enhanced Region-of-Interest (ROI) tokens, and combines them with global temporal image context during generation. To connect these region tokens with clinical text, we propose Temporal Region--Phrase Alignment, a pretraining objective that aligns temporal anatomical representations with localized report phrases. We evaluate CheXGround on single-study and longitudinal Visual Question Answering (VQA), longitudinal findings generation, temporal grounded VQA, and anatomical grounding. Across these tasks, CheXGround improves clinical language quality, temporal reasoning, and localization accuracy over recent baselines. Our results suggest that organizing longitudinal evidence at the anatomical level is a strong representation for grounded radiology language modeling. Project page: https://adonaydem.github.io/chexground-website

Deep-learning models can achieve strong chest X-ray (CXR) classification performance without establishing whether their predictions predominantly rely on pulmonary image content. This study evaluates pulmonary attribution containment as an anatomy-related reliability property distinct from diagnostic performance. We propose DBCA-SegNet-MGAP, a multi-task anatomy-guided CNN-Transformer framework that combines complementary feature representations through bidirectional cross-backbone attention, predicts a soft lung mask, and incorporates this anatomical prior directly into classification through Mask-Guided Adaptive Global Average Pooling (MGAP). Pulmonary attribution containment is quantified using the Anatomical Local Energy Ratio (ALR) and high-intensity cumulative ALR (cALR@0.9). Experiments were repeated across three training seeds using the COVID-19 Radiography Database for four-class internal testing and a locked Shenzhen-to-Montgomery protocol for zero-shot external tuberculosis testing. On COVID-19, the proposed model achieved a weighted F1 of $0.9615 \pm 0.0015$ and macro ROC-AUC of $0.9906 \pm 0.0007$. In an architecture-matched dual-bridge comparison, replacing conventional GAP with MGAP increased ALR from $0.3878 \pm 0.0098$ to $0.7086 \pm 0.0104$ and cALR@0.9 from $0.5265 \pm 0.0101$ to $0.9905 \pm 0.0018$, while weighted F1 remained essentially unchanged ($0.9618 \pm 0.0015$ vs. $0.9615 \pm 0.0015$). Under locked external transfer to Montgomery, ROC-AUC remained $0.9080 \pm 0.0043$ and pulmonary ALR remained $0.6466 \pm 0.0081$, whereas weighted F1 decreased to $0.7528 \pm 0.0080$ and ECE increased to $0.1683 \pm 0.0055$. These findings show that diagnostic discrimination, calibration, and pulmonary attribution containment are distinct model properties and support their joint evaluation under internal testing and external domain shift.

Vision-language models, such as contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP)-based approaches, have reached state-of-the-art (SOTA) results in medical artificial intelligence. However, recent work reveals that CLIP-based models remain vulnerable to shortcuts. We investigate how real-world shortcuts manifest across different layers of the medical CLIP-based model, MedCLIP, and its vision encoder, a frozen ResNet-50. We attach 17 linear classification probes to the intermediate layers of the ResNet-50 and train them on three different dataset configurations and targets: NIH-CXR14 (pneumothorax) and PadChest (cardiomegaly and pneumothorax). This setup allows us to observe model behaviour during evaluation using subgroup-based calibration and layer-wise confidence curves. We find that the final linear probes achieve a high AUROC but poor calibration in the models. The layer-wise confidence analyses suggest that shortcuts emerge at different depths. Patterns consistent with localised shortcuts, such as drains, appear at later layers, while patterns consistent with diffuse shortcuts, such as scanner-specific noise patterns, emerge earlier, aligning with previous work. Finally, we conduct a manual analysis of the images, which reveals data quality issues in both NIH-CXR14 and PadChest. Our findings underscore that even SOTA models remain vulnerable to shortcuts, and the need for high-quality and well-annotated datasets to draw solid conclusions. Code can be found on our GitHub: https://github.com/nikodice4/MedCLIP_shortcuts.

Assessing catheter and tube placement on chest X-rays is safety-critical yet tedious and error-prone. Current deep learning methods either classify placement globally -- losing track of which device is where -- or segment all devices into a single mask, making per-device assessment impossible when catheters overlap. We introduce UCompCXR, a compositional framework that detects local catheter fragments, associates them into device instances via graph-based clustering, fuses per-fragment tip predictions through precision-weighted Gaussian estimation, and classifies placement per device. On the RANZCR CLiP dataset (30,083 images, 5-fold patient-level CV with bootstrap CIs), UCompCXR detects 26% more devices than a strong multi-task baseline sharing the same MobileNetV3 backbone, with 75% fewer false positives and well-calibrated tip uncertainty (95% coverage = 0.948). The aggregate tip error rises -- but only because the model finds devices the baseline misses entirely, especially nasogastric tubes. On matched devices, catastrophic localization failures drop substantially. At 2.27M parameters in a single forward pass, the model is deployable on resource-constrained clinical hardware.

Public chest X-ray repositories are widely used to train medical AI systems, yet their labels are typically extracted from radiology reports rather than verified directly on images. As a result, repository labels are often treated as image-level ground truth without validating whether they reflect what is actually visible in the radiograph. We introduce Repository Supervision Auditing (RSA), a framework that evaluates repository-derived labels against expert image-level annotations before model development. Using cardiomegaly in MIMIC-CXR as a case study, RSA compares repository labels with radiologist-reviewed image annotations, characterizes disagreement sources, and builds a curated cohort for deployment-oriented evaluation. Repository-derived cardiomegaly labels showed near-zero agreement with expert image-level assessment, identifying only 1% of expert-confirmed cases. Most discrepancies resulted from non-mention rather than explicit report negation, with expert-confirmed cardiomegaly identified in nearly half of studies assigned a repository-derived No Finding label. Using the resulting expert-curated cohort, a DenseNet121 model achieved a test ROC-AUC of 0.853. These findings show that repository labels may not reliably represent image-level truth and highlight supervision auditing as a critical step for developing trustworthy medical imaging AI.

Thoracic pathologies rarely occur in isolation, yet standard multi-label classifiers rely on shared global descriptors, discarding \emph{where} findings lie and \emph{how} they co-occur. We propose \textbf{C$\mathbf{^2}$A} (Co-occurrence Aware Class Attention), a classification head that explicitly couples spatial evidence with clinical priors. First, C$^2$A casts pooling as an expectation over learned per-class spatial attention maps, yielding localized descriptors for each disease. Second, it couples these descriptors via a learnable graph warm-started from empirical label co-occurrence. A single residual message-passing step shares evidence among related findings, proving to be a bounded perturbation of the identity where co-occurrence enters each logit through an explicit bilinear interaction. On CheXpert, C$^2$A achieves a superior $0.895$ macro-mean AUROC, outperforming advanced context-gating baselines. Crucially, gains concentrate on highly co-occurrent classes with ambiguous spatial evidence (rescuing Atelectasis by $+1.5$ over GCG), demonstrating the prior's regularizing effect with a negligible overhead of one linear projection and a $C\!\times\!C$ edge matrix.

Text-conditioned chest X-ray generation aims to synthesize realistic radiographs that faithfully depict specified findings. Existing work has primarily improved quality by updating image generators, implicitly treating prompts as fixed after CXR-domain adaptation. We show that this generator-centric view leaves a substantial optimization dimension underexplored. With a CXR-adapted Sana generator frozen, one-pass reformulation by an unmodified LLM reduces RadDINO-FID from 54.225 to 27.572. Prompt analysis shows that the LLM suppresses temporal comparisons, uncertainty, and other non-renderable report content while emphasizing visible radiographic findings. However, unconstrained reformulation reduces BioViL-T alignment with source prompts from 0.695 to 0.609. We therefore introduce JustLLMGRPO, which applies standard Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) only to the LLM prompt policy while keeping Sana frozen. Group-relative radiology-aware image feedback retains visual focus while preserving source-prompt alignment. On CheXGenBench, JustLLMGRPO reduces RadDINO-FID to 26.780, a 50.6% improvement over direct prompting, while maintaining alignment (0.696 versus 0.695). It also achieves state-of-the-art distribution coverage and downstream classification utility. These results show that substantial performance can remain latent in how radiographic information is expressed to an adapted generator. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/pxcai/JustLLMGRPO.

Accurate chest X-ray interpretation is inherently hierarchical. Clinical decisions depend not only on what abnormality is present but where it is situated, requiring reasoning from broad anatomical systems down to specific pathological findings. Yet existing automated systems largely treat this as a flat classification problem, failing to capture inter-level dependencies or enforce coherence between coarse and fine predictions. We propose CHASE (Classification with Hierarchical Analysis and Structured Enforcement), a unified single-stage framework that mirrors radiologists' coarse-to-fine reasoning through a clinically driven three-level taxonomy of 9 anatomical regions, 17 sub-regions, and 28 pathological findings. CHASE jointly optimizes multi-level supervision, cross-level probability alignment, and a hierarchy-violation penalty within a shared Vision Transformer backbone. This ensures that fine-grained findings are anatomically supported by their coarser-level context rather than predicted in isolation. Experiments demonstrate that CHASE outperforms flat and hierarchical baselines across all levels while achieving superior probabilistic hierarchy consistency, with level-wise attention maps confirming anatomically grounded predictions. Code is available at: https://github.com/yejix-ai/CHASE.

Large chest radiography archives are difficult to search because most studies are paired only with free-text reports rather than structured clinical annotations. Vision-language models offer a natural interface for text-to-image retrieval, but current biomedical models are primarily optimized for report-to-image matching rather than for satisfying short clinical search queries. This creates an objective mismatch: a model may retrieve images related to words in the query while failing to satisfy the full clinical constraint, especially for conjunctions and negations such as ``atelectasis and no pneumonia.'' We introduce CXR-Retrieve, a structured benchmark for compositional chest X-ray text-to-image retrieval. The benchmark contains 5,159 test images from the official test-split of MIMIC-CXR-JPG and 145 textual queries spanning single and conjunction findings, both positive and negative. Relevance is defined by whether a retrieved image satisfies all asserted pathology constraints, rather than by whether it matches a paired report. We further propose a label-aware contrastive fine-tuning objective for clinical retrieval. Our method attracts image-text pairs with compatible asserted pathology constraints, including shared confirmed absences, while explicitly repelling contradictory pairs. Starting from the in-domain CXR-CLIP checkpoint, our method improves Precision@5 over CXR-CLIP by 8.5 percentage points on two-pathology conjunctions and by 22.0 percentage points on negation queries. These results show that reliable chest X-ray retrieval requires training objectives that model not only which findings are mentioned, but also how they are clinically asserted.

Automated classification of pulmonary disease from chest radiographs is a widely studied application of machine learning in medical imaging. This paper presents a pilot study evaluating classical texture- and gradient-based feature representations for distinguishing COVID-19 from other forms of pneumonia using the publicly available COVID-19 Image Data Collection (668 posteroanterior/anteroposterior radiographs from 408 patients). Using histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture descriptors with classical classifiers (logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine), evaluated under patient-level 5-fold stratified cross-validation to prevent data leakage, we obtain a best mean accuracy of 75.4% and AUC of 0.755, modestly exceeding the 71.6% majority-class baseline. We report these results transparently, including their limitations, and use them to motivate and scope a proposed multi-modal deep learning architecture -- combining convolutional and transformer-based encoders across imaging modalities -- as a direction for future work requiring access to larger, multi-institutional, ethically sourced datasets.

With the increase in the number of cases related to respiratory diseases, there is an urgent need to detect them early and diagnose them accurately. Convolutional neural networks have given promising results when used for diagnosing diseases using imaging tests. In this study, we investigate the potential of applying deep learning algorithms such as VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet50 for classification of lung ailments based on X-ray images. A detailed analysis of the aforementioned models' performances was conducted to assess how well they can classify various types of lung ailments, including pneumonia, tuberculosis, lung cancer, and normal lungs. In order to do that, these deep learning models were trained on a vast amount of X-ray images. The results of our study show that while all three models provide good results, ResNet-50 performs best in comparison with other models due to its efficiency and high level of accuracy. We believe that these deep learning models can be successfully implemented in the practice of diagnosing pulmonary diseases in the future. It helps with early disease detection and improves patient outcomes.

Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment. However, commonly used report-derived labels for pathology classification or generic image quality metrics for reconstruction may not reliably reflect clinical judgment. We systematically investigate how evaluation-reference choices affect model performance and ranking in both pathology classification and image quality assessment (IQA). To enable controlled comparison across evaluation references, we collected paired expert image- and report-derived labels for thoracic findings from a clinical cohort at Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH) and curated a subset of the public MIMIC-CXR dataset, along with expert ratings of diagnostic image quality. We show that for supervised image classifiers (ResNet, DenseNet), several zero-shot and fine-tuned vision-language models (e.g., MedKLIP, GLoRIA, and ConVIRT), changing the label source leads to substantial differences not only in performance estimates but also in model rankings. In parallel, alignment of IQA measures with expert judgment depends heavily on the choice of measure, and commonly used IQA metrics such as SSIM and PSNR often fail to align with expert assessments of diagnostic usability. Our results demonstrate that evaluation choices are crucial: they can determine which models and methods appear best and are therefore selected for further development or deployment. The selection of evaluation references should therefore be treated as a central component of clinical validity in CXR machine learning, and justified with respect to the pathology, imaging task, and intended downstream clinical use.

This position paper argues that claims about explanation stability are scientifically invalid without cross method validation. Just as statistical significance requires the test statistic to be specified, stability should either be evaluated across multiple attribution paradigms or explicitly scoped to the computational objective of a single method. In controlled chest X ray experiments, DenseNet201, ResNet50V2, and InceptionV3 achieved AUC values above 99%, yet their stability rankings reversed across attribution methods. LayerCAM ranked InceptionV3 as the most stable model, with an IoU of 0.777, whereas GradCAM++ favored DenseNet201 and reduced InceptionV3 stability score by 17.3%. These findings demonstrate that explanation stability is an emergent property of the model method pair rather than an intrinsic characteristic of the model alone. We therefore argue that explanation based claims should be validated across multiple attribution methods and that regulatory submissions should explicitly specify the attribution operators used to avoid creating illusory safety assurances.

Chest radiography (CXR) remains the most widely used thoracic imaging modality, yet expert interpretation is constrained by a severe shortage of radiologists in Thailand and across Southeast Asia. Local adaptation of deep learning models to Thai data has been shown to substantially improve accuracy on Thai populations. Here we present the development and comprehensive validation of the chest radiograph analysis model in Inspectra CXR version 5, a deep learning system that performs multi-label thoracic disease classification and weakly supervised lesion localization within a single model. The architecture couples a DenseNet-121 backbone with Attend-and-Compare Modules (ACM) and a Probabilistic Class Activation Map (PCAM) aggregation layer, producing a per-condition classification score and heatmap simultaneously. The model was developed on 874,858 frontal chest radiographs with paired radiologist reports from Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok. On a held-out, radiologist-verified in-domain test set of 19,871 cases, it achieved a mean AUROC of 0.994 (mean sensitivity 92.4%, specificity 98.6%) across nine clinically important conditions. On an independent generalization set of 5,992 cases from 13 hospitals across Thailand, the mean AUROC was 0.970, indicating robust transfer across sites. For localization, evaluated on 4,549 radiologist-annotated cases, the model attained a mean lesion-localization fraction (LLF) of 77.9% at 0.59 non-lesion localizations per image. In a usability evaluation with five thoracic radiologists, the system reached a classification concordance of 93.6%, a localization concordance of 94.7%, and a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 89. These results indicate that a locally developed, localization-capable CXR system can deliver high accuracy, generalize across heterogeneous Thai hospitals, and earn the trust of practicing radiologists.

Despite rapid advances in chest X-ray (CXR) foundation models, most radiology report generation (RRG) systems still rely on heavily downsampled inputs (e.g., 256x256) due to the fixed visual token budgets of pretrained vision encoders, suppressing subtle yet clinically important cues present in native-resolution images. However, enabling high-resolution (high-res) perception remains challenging: naive tiling causes prohibitive token inflation, while global compression suppresses subtle lesions and degrades diagnostic fidelity. Inspired by radiologists' workflow, localizing suspicious regions before detailed high-res assessment. We propose Lesion-Aware High-Resolution Patch Discovery and Fusion for Chest X-ray Reporting (LePaX), the first RRG framework that enables efficient high-res CXR perception (up to 1920x1920) without increasing the vision-token count. LePaX formulates high-res perception as a constrained spatial resolution allocation problem under a fixed token budget and introduces two key components: Learnable Spatial Resolution Allocation (LSRA), which learns a spatial utility map that adaptively allocates limited high-res capacity to diagnostically relevant regions, enabling targeted extraction of high-res patches from native CXRs; and Global-Regional Fusion (GRF), which performs token-preserving region-to-global refinement by projecting high-resolution regional evidence back onto the global feature grid through spatially aligned resolution write-back, avoiding token inflation. Experiments on multiple CXR benchmarks demonstrate that LePaX consistently improves both clinical and linguistic metrics while enabling native-resolution CXR perception with over 10x fewer visual tokens than naive high-res tiling.

Public chest-radiograph (CXR) datasets are typically released with small, fixed label schemas such as CheXpert-14. However, the underlying free-text reports describe far more findings -- and which findings matter depends on the task, site, and reader. We release a pipeline that converts free-text reports into multi-label matrices and then reconfigures the label schema through dictionary edits rather than new inference passes, i.e., without relabeling the corpus. After this one-time pass, reconfiguring MIMIC-CXR (223K reports) from cached annotations takes 196 seconds with no API cost, compared to $6.6K for an equivalent relabeling pass with Claude Opus 4.7. Using a 58-label taxonomy, we show that 43% of CXR studies contain at least one finding outside CheXpert-14. Image probes trained on these labels match CheXpert-14 probes on shared targets while also reaching 0.78 AUROC on expert-reviewed long-tail labels that CheXpert-14 cannot represent. These results suggest a different unit of work for radiology labeling: once reports are structured, the label schema becomes a configuration to edit, not a corpus to relabel.

Accurate and efficient classification of thoracic diseases in chest X-ray (CXR) images is crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment. However, the presence of multiple pathologies with overlapping visual characteristics poses significant challenges for automated classification systems. In this study, we propose two novel hierarchical multi-label classification techniques, namely the loss-based and logit-based methods, to address these challenges by leveraging the hierarchical relationships among different thoracic pathologies. The loss-based technique integrates hierarchical information directly into the optimization process, while the logit-based method adjusts the predicted probabilities of each class based on its parent class in the disease taxonomy. We evaluate the performance of both techniques using three large-scale CXR datasets: CheXpert (224,316 CXRs), PADCHEST (160,000 CXRs), and NIH (112,120 CXRs). The experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy, AUC, and F1 scores compared to the baseline method across various pathologies. The logit-based and loss-based methods improve accuracy by 12% and 11%, AUC by 13% and 10%, and F1 scores by 24% and 12%, respectively compared to the baseline. These results represent a substantial improvement over the baseline method. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive statistical analysis to validate the robustness and reliability of the proposed techniques. The integration of domain-specific hierarchical knowledge not only enhances the classification performance but also provides a more interpretable output for clinical decision support. Our findings highlight the potential of hierarchical multi-label classification in advancing computer-aided diagnosis systems for chest radiography.

Automated chest X-ray classification remains challenging due to severe class imbalance, co-occurring pathologies, and the loss of localized features in conventional architectures. To address these, we propose an explainable hierarchical multi-view ensemble framework for the robust classification of 14 thoracic pathologies. The framework employs view-specific training by independently modeling frontal and lateral radiographs using an ensemble of five complementary convolutional neural networks. Replacing global average pooling, a multi-scale feature fusion strategy augmented with Convolutional Block Attention Modules (CBAM) preserves fine-grained intermediate representations while emphasizing high-level pathology-specific semantic features. To mitigate positive-negative imbalance and varying inter-class difficulty, models are optimized using a novel hybrid objective combining Asymmetric Loss with Adaptive Focal Loss. Beyond simple probability averaging, the framework incorporates a hierarchical meta-learning strategy where test-time augmentation (TTA) predictions and cross-model uncertainty measures are integrated into Level-1 gradient-boosting meta-learners (XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost), followed by Level-2 stacking with optimized alpha blending. Evaluated on a large-scale CheXpert-style dataset, the framework achieves state-of-the-art macro-average AUROC scores of 0.9319 for frontal and 0.9154 for lateral radiographs. Furthermore, comprehensive explainability analysis using seven post-hoc attribution techniques demonstrates strong anatomical consistency and clinically meaningful decision localization. By integrating architectural diversity, multi-scale attention, hierarchical meta-learning, and rigorous explainability, the proposed framework provides a transparent, highly accurate, and clinically practical computer-aided diagnosis system for thoracic disease classification.

In chest X-ray (CXR) classification, acceptable ranking performance can still leave rare-positive patients below threshold, especially within subgroups. We study this pre-deployment fairness problem as an audit question: after a long-tailed multi-label CXR model is converted from scores into decisions, who is missed? Across VinDr-CXR and MIMIC-CXR/CXR-LT, we use a diagnostic ladder to separate class-level long-tail losses, subgroup-aware weighting, group robustness, and threshold selection. On VinDr-CXR, group-tail weighting followed by tail-aware thresholding reduces tail FNR from 0.665 to 0.269, sex worst-group FNR from 0.705 to 0.157, and age worst-group FNR from 0.822 to 0.133, while macro-mAP increases from 0.611 to 0.635. On MIMIC-CXR/CXR-LT, the same score-to-threshold comparison reduces tail FNR from 0.866 to 0.741 and lowers worst-group FNR across sex, age, race, and insurance; residual missed-positive rates nevertheless remain high. Paired bootstrap contrasts on VinDr support the thresholded FNR reductions, and GroupDRO reference runs indicate that aggregate group robustness alone does not remove rare subgroup misses in this setting. The study supports a narrow audit claim: rare-label fairness in CXR depends jointly on the finding, subgroup, and operating threshold, not on label frequency or ranking metrics alone.

Medical imaging models often degrade when deployed at new clinical sites due to differences in imaging equipment, protocols, and patient populations. Test-time adaptation (TTA) addresses this by updating a pretrained model using only unlabeled target data, without access to source data. However, existing TTA methods were designed for single-label classification on natural image benchmarks, minimizing entropy uniformly across all samples without considering label dependencies. This overlooks a key property of multi-label medical imaging: pathologies do not occur independently but exhibit structured co-occurrence patterns. In this work, we propose Co-occurrence Weighted Adaptation (CoWA), which leverages disease co-occurrence patterns as a reliability signal for adaptation. CoWA estimates label co-occurrence structure from model predictions and downweights samples that deviate from expected patterns, enabling adaptation to rely more on consistent predictions while reducing the impact of noisy ones. We evaluate CoWA on chest X-ray benchmarks under domain shifts and demonstrate consistent improvements over established baselines.

Radiologists routinely compare current and prior chest X-rays to track disease progression, producing follow-up reports that describe multiple findings, each localised to an anatomical region and annotated with a temporal change status. Existing automated methods either generate reports from a single image without modelling temporal context, or incorporate temporal information but do not ground their outputs spatially. The few approaches that combine temporal reasoning with spatial grounding are restricted to single-finding descriptions, leaving multi-finding reports with mixed change directions unaddressed. We present GRCD, a framework for grounded report generation from chest X-ray pairs in the multi-finding setting. We first construct a rigorously cleaned dataset of temporal chest X-ray pairs by identifying and correcting two systematic labelling errors in the source annotations. We then introduce a Region-Guided Change Token module that encodes per-region temporal change across anatomical structures and injects this signal into a language model through a dual-pathway strategy combining prepended spatial tokens with gated cross-attention. On a multi-finding test set, GRCD outperforms existing baselines on text generation and clinical accuracy metrics, with gains in change detection. Ablation studies confirm that the dual-pathway design outperforms either integration strategy in isolation on text and clinical metrics, and that region-level change encoding is necessary for multi-finding generation. Code is available at https://github.com/UTSA-VIRLab/GRCD

Chest X-ray multi-label classification is a core task in intelligent medical imaging diagnosis. However, real clinical data often exhibit extreme long-tailed distributions, leading to degraded performance on rare diseases in tail classes. This issue is not only driven by data scarcity but also by two intrinsic factors:1) attenuation of tail-class lesion representations under complex anatomical backgrounds, and 2) dominance of head classes in modeling label co-occurrence relationships. To address these challenges, we propose TRCGL-Net. First, a learnable text-guided conditional diffusion model is employed to generate high-quality tail-class chest X-ray image samples under disease semantic constraints, improving data diversity and realism of rare disease patterns while alleviating class imbalance and preserving pathology-consistent semantics.Second, a channel reweighting mechanism is introduced to perform feature recalibration by emphasizing disease-relevant feature channels, thereby improving feature discriminability under long-tailed distributions.A class-aware attention mechanism is further applied to generate class-specific attention maps, enabling the model to localize disease-relevant regions and focus on fine-grained lesion areas.Finally, a graph convolution network based on label co occurrence is introduced to establish an information propagation mechanism among categories. Experiments on the PadChest dataset show that the proposed method achieves a tail-class mAP of 0.4904, an overall mAP of 0.4408, and an mAUC of 0.8989, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. TRCGL-Net effectively improves recognition performance for rare diseases under long-tailed distributions and mitigates the impact of extreme class imbalance in chest X-ray multi-label classification.

Conventional vision-language models are largely object-centric, focusing on detecting and describing individual entities. In safety-critical X-ray baggage screening, however, threat often emerges not from a single object but from the functional compatibility of spatially dispersed components, such as batteries, detonators, and explosive charges. We formalize this setting as \emph{compositional threat reasoning}, where risk is modeled as a relational property of grounded regions rather than an independent detection outcome. We introduce \textbf{Falcon}, a multimodal framework that abstracts segmentation-aware region features into a structured safety state capturing component presence, pairwise functional compatibility, and scene-level risk. This structured representation is injected into the language model as an explicit intermediate interface, encouraging relationally consistent and safety-aware reasoning. To evaluate this problem, we present \textbf{Falcon-X}, a benchmark that unifies dense grounding with structured supervision over component completeness and risk inference in cluttered X-ray imagery. Experiments show that while existing multimodal models adapt to appearance, they struggle with compositional safety reasoning. Falcon improves functional grounding and produces more coherent threat assessments, establishing compositional safety reasoning as a distinct evaluation paradigm for multimodal systems.

Chest X-ray visual question answering (CXR VQA) requires models not only to predict correct answers, but also to produce reliable medical reasoning. However, existing reinforcement-learning-based training typically relies on answer-level rewards, which are often too coarse to improve chain-of-thought (CoT) quality and can become ineffective when group-level advantages collapse to zero. We propose \textbf{Teach-to-Reason (T2R)}, a framework that introduces comparison-based supervision into CoT optimization through a self-improving \emph{Teacher} and a competition-guided \emph{Reasoner}. As the Teacher is iteratively strengthened via self-competition, the Reasoner is optimized against progressively stronger Teacher-generated references. We further introduce a case-wise reward design that preserves the original reward-induced positive/negative partition when it is informative, and restores supervision from competition scores when the original reward signal degenerates. Experiments on multiple CXR open-ended VQA benchmarks show that T2R consistently outperforms strong baselines, indicating that comparison-based supervision, when integrated in a controlled and principled manner, provides a more effective training signal for reasoning optimization.

In longitudinal clinical practice, every chest X-ray is read in the context of the patients prior exam, and much of what the radiologist communicates is the change from one visit to the next. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first training-free best-of-N sampling scheme for pre-trained chest X-ray report generators that is explicitly aware of this longitudinal prior to current transition. We call it transition-aware best-of-N sampling, each report is split into sentences and embedded into an unordered set in Rd; each (prior, current) pair is reduced to a fixed-dim directional vector via a set-to-set distance designed to encode the change between the two sets; and candidates are scored by cosine distance from their candidate transition vector to a cached bank of ground-truth training transition vectors, aggregated as min or kNN. We instantiate the framework with four directional set distances (mean-shift, novelty residual, directed-Hausdorff anchor, and cost-weighted optimal transport) and evaluate on a multi-visit AP-PA cohort, running inference under three prompts on three vision-language generators. Transition-aware best-of-N outperforms random selection across the board, with the largest relative gains on the Impression section.

We propose NoduLoCC2026, a challenge on lung nodule detection and localization in chest X-ray images. We have provided a dataset for both tasks and received submissions from 5 international teams. The participating teams' solutions are presented in this work along with results on an external dataset used for testing. Proposed methods show good performance on the classification task. The best method shows a balanced accuracy score of 0.72 and AUC-ROC of 0.79. We highlight the limitations of current approaches for the localization task, with the best approach having predicted the correct number of nodules on 53% of the test images with a median distance of 12.83mm, showing that it is a more challenging task than the first one. The challenge website is available via https://gt-i2mdp.github.io/website/nodule_challenge.html.

The evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) for chest X-ray (CXR) analysis has largely been limited to disease-presence classification without visual grounding. Such evaluations fail to verify the expert-level lesion perception necessary to ensure the clinical reliability of VLMs. To address these limitations, we introduce CheXpercept, a sequential, multi-level perception benchmark that mirrors a radiologist's cognitive workflow across coarse-level detection, fine-level contour evaluation and revision, and semantic-level attribute extraction. To ensure high clinical fidelity at scale, we construct the dataset using a semi-automated generation pipeline paired with a review by six medical experts. CheXpercept contains 10,400 QA items derived from 2,100 CXRs, covering seven clinically critical pulmonary and cardiac lesions. To demonstrate the current landscape of VLM perception, we benchmark 14 general and medical VLMs on CheXpercept. The models achieve adequate performance only at the coarse level, with accuracy degrading precipitously on deeper visual tasks. Notably, medical VLMs show almost no perceptual advantage over their general-domain counterparts, highlighting a systemic flaw in current domain adaptation. The code and dataset will be publicly available.

Inference-time engineering can alter model behavior without fine-tuning. However, its utility for improving diagnostic performance in medical vision-language models (VLMs) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate whether Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) can improve pneumonia classification in chest radiograph VLMs without updating model weights. Three frozen chest radiograph VLMs (MedGemma-4B-IT, NV-Reason-CXR-3B, and CheXOne-3B) were evaluated on the public Kermany pneumonia test set. Classification was based on the logits of the tokens Yes and No under a binary prompt. Steering vectors included a 30-pair answer-bias control, a 30-pair pneumonia text contrast, and an image-conditioned contrast derived from 30 pneumonia and 30 normal development images. A deterministic 200-image development set was used for layer and scale selection (100 images) and threshold calibration (100 images). Performance was assessed using ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, F1 score, threshold analyses, reverse-vector controls, random-vector controls, and conditional bootstrap confidence intervals. Fixed-threshold F1 improvements were frequently observed but did not consistently indicate improved diagnostic performance. For MedGemma-4B-IT. NV-Reason-CXR-3B showed the strongest benefit: calibrated F1 improved from 0.7692 in the zero-shot setting to 0.8619 with pneumonia-text steering and to 0.8727 with image-conditioned steering. For CheXOne-3B, pneumonia-text steering increased calibrated F1 from 0.8528 to 0.8666, although the confidence interval crossed zero. On this public pneumonia benchmark, CAA substantially altered prediction score distributions and operating characteristics without fine-tuning. Meaningful performance gains were observed in one of three evaluated VLMs, suggesting that activation steering may serve as a lightweight approach for adapting medical VLM behavior.

Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation often requires longitudinal comparison to assess disease progression. Existing approaches typically rely on temporal feature fusion or inter-study discrepancy modeling, yet remain limited in capturing subtle progression semantics and overlook the inherently directional nature of disease trajectories. In this paper, we propose ProTrans, a novel vision-language pretraining framework that formulates disease progression as a directional semantic transition between paired CXR studies. ProTrans leverages radiology reports to anchor individual CXR representations within interpretable disease states, and introduces a learnable progression feature map to explicitly encode semantic shifts between states, aligned with report-derived progression descriptions. To enforce direction-aware perception, ProTrans incorporates a reversed temporal modeling process and imposes bidirectional reconstruction consistency across states and transitions, thereby disentangling directional semantics and promoting coherent trajectory modeling. Extensive experiments on longitudinal downstream tasks, including disease progression classification and progression captioning, demonstrate that ProTrans consistently outperforms existing methods, establishing a unified pretraining framework for longitudinal CXR understanding. https://github.com/RPIDIAL/ProTrans

Clinical diagnosis often requires combining imaging with physiological measurements, yet deployed models typically operate on unimodal data. We present PaCX-MAE, a cross-modal distillation framework that injects physiological priors into chest X-ray (CXR) encoders while remaining strictly unimodal at inference. PaCX-MAE augments in-domain masked autoencoding with a dual contrastive-predictive objective, aligning CXR representations with paired ECG and laboratory embeddings. Extensive evaluation across nine benchmarks demonstrates consistent improvements over domain-specific MAE, particularly on physiology-dependent tasks (e.g., +2.7 AUROC on MedMod; +6.5 F1 on VinDr). The method proves highly label-efficient in the 1% regime and preserves anatomical fidelity, achieving parity with MAE on segmentation tasks. Zero-shot and attention analyses confirm that PaCX-MAE successfully learns to attend to physiological indicators, such as the cardiac silhouette, absent in standard visual pretraining.

Early prediction of respiratory failure is critical for timely clinical intervention in intensive care units. Existing electronic health record (EHR)-based models can continuously monitor physiologic deterioration, but they may not fully capture pulmonary pathophysiology reflected in chest radiographs (CXRs). In this study, we ask whether CXR information improves prospective prediction of invasive mechanical ventilation beyond EHR signals alone. We develop a gated multimodal framework that integrates structured EHR time-series data with CXR foundation-model representations. The gating module adaptively controls the contribution of imaging features based on patient-specific clinical context, allowing the model to selectively rely on imaging information when it is informative. We prospectively evaluate the framework for predicting invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 hours in ICU patients and compare it with an established EHR-only model (Ventio), physician predictions obtained at matched clinical time points, and alternative multimodal variants. The gated multimodal models achieved higher discrimination than the EHR-only baseline, with AUROC values of 0.860 and 0.858 using REMEDIS and MedInsight CXR representations, respectively, compared with 0.752 for Ventio. Relative to physician predictions, the multimodal framework substantially improved sensitivity while maintaining favorable specificity. Compared with the EHR-only model, multimodal integration increased specificity and positive predictive value, suggesting that CXR information can refine risk estimation in selected patients. These findings support adaptive multimodal fusion as a practical strategy for incorporating imaging into prospective respiratory failure prediction.

Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) show promise in medical applications, but their inability to faithfully ground responses in visual evidence raises serious concerns about clinical trustworthiness. While visual attribution methods are widely used to explain LVLM predictions, whether these explanations actually reflect the visual evidence underlying the model's decision is largely unverified, since ground-truth annotations for internal model reasoning are typically unavailable. We address this question for chest X-ray (CXR) reasoning by developing a causal evaluation framework that retains only CXR-VQA samples for which the expert-annotated region is verified, via counterfactual editing, to be causally responsible for the model's prediction. Using this framework across 11 attribution methods, six open-source LVLMs, and two output modes (direct answer and step-by-step reasoning), we find that existing attribution methods often fail to identify the evidence used by LVLMs. To address this failure, we propose MedFocus, a concept-based attribution method that localizes clinically meaningful anatomical regions via unbalanced optimal transport and measures their causal effect on model outputs through targeted interventions. MedFocus produces spatial, concept-level, and token-level attributions and substantially outperforms prior methods, taking a step toward more trustworthy attribution for medical LVLMs. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/gzxiong/medfocus/.

Vision-language alignment using chest X-rays and radiology reports has emerged as an advanced paradigm for zero-shot classification and grounding of chest X-ray findings. However, standard contrastive learning typically treats radiographs and reports from different patients simply as negative pairs. This assumption introduces noisy negatives, as different patients frequently exhibit similar findings. Such noisy negatives cause semantic ambiguity and degrade performance in zero-shot understanding tasks. To address this challenge, we propose CoNNS, a concept-guided noisy-negative suppression framework. To support the negative suppression mechanism, unlike previous methods that use raw reports or templatized texts, we construct a hierarchical concept ontology using large language models. The ontology structures 41 key clinical concepts by explicitly modeling presence, attributes (location and characteristics), and texts (evidential segment and presence statement). Leveraging this ontology, we implement a cross-patient pair relabeling strategy comprising three steps: (1) Fine-Grained Breakdown to categorize pairs based on finding presence; (2) Noisy Negative Filtering to resolve semantic conflicts by removing false negatives; and (3) Hard Negative Mining to identify subtle attribute discrepancies using a lightweight language model. Finally, we propose a Concept-Aware NCE loss to align visual features with text while suppressing the identified noisy negatives. Extensive experiments across multi-granularity zero-shot grounding tasks and five zero-shot classification datasets validate that CoNNS outperforms existing state-of-the-art models. The code is available at https://github.com/DopamineLcy/conns.

Rare diseases dominate the diagnostic challenge in medical imaging yet are severely underrepresented in clinical datasets, causing classifiers to fail on exactly the conditions where reliable detection matters most. Generative augmentation can supply the missing tail-class coverage, but coarse disease labels aggregate diverse subtypes and acquisition settings into multi-modal conditionals that bias generators toward dominant submodes, while a shared Gaussian source forces rare subpopulations through disproportionately long transport paths. We propose an offline strategy that introduces informative priors at two levels: first, we partition each coarse label into coherent submodes via Gaussian mixture modeling in the generative model's latent space; second, we learn subclass-conditioned source distributions that re-center and re-scale the starting distribution per submode, shortening trajectories and reducing within-subclass dispersion. To prevent degenerate solutions we impose explicit geometric control, moderately concentrating normalized displacement directions around learnable prototypes while capping path-length outliers. On long-tailed chest X-ray (MIMIC-LT, NIH-LT) and CT slice (CT-RATE) benchmarks the proposed method consistently improves tail-class generation fidelity and diversity (FID, IRS) and is a promising augmentation strategy that reliably improves downstream balanced accuracy and macro-F1 over a non-augmented baseline across modalities.

Longitudinal chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation requires reasoning over disease evolution across multiple patient visits, yet most existing medical VQA benchmarks focus on single images or short-horizon image pairs. We introduce MI-CXR, a benchmark for standardized evaluation of Multi-Interval longitudinal reasoning over multi-visit CXR sequences, without requiring free-form report generation or additional clinical context. MI-CXR comprises five-way multiple-choice questions over five-visit patient timelines and instantiates three complementary task families: Temporal Event Localization, Interval-wise Change Reasoning, and Global Trajectory Summarization, which assess clinically grounded visual reasoning over time. Evaluating 14 state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) shows low overall performance, with an average accuracy of 29.3%, only modestly above random guessing. Using stage-wise diagnostic probing, we find that models often produce locally plausible interval descriptions but fail to enforce temporal constraints or compose evidence into globally consistent decisions over the full timeline. These findings reveal key limitations of current VLMs and establish MI-CXR as a principled benchmark for longitudinal medical reasoning. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/AIDASLab/MI-CXR

Chest radiograph interpretation requires temporal reasoning over prior and current studies, yet most vision-language models are trained on static image-report pairs and lack explicit supervision for modeling longitudinal change. We introduce CheXTemporal, a dataset for temporally grounded reasoning in chest radiography consisting of paired prior-current chest X-rays (CXR) with finding-level temporal and spatial annotations. The dataset includes a five-class progression taxonomy (new, worse, stable, improved, resolved), localized spatial supervision of pathology, explicit spatial-temporal alignment across paired studies, and multi-source coverage for cross-domain evaluation. We additionally construct a 280K-pair silver dataset with automatically derived temporal and anatomical supervision for large-scale evaluation under weaker supervision. Using these resources, we evaluate multiple state-of-the-art vision-language CXR models on grounding and progression-classification tasks in a zero-shot setting. Across both gold and silver evaluations, current models exhibit consistent limitations in spatial grounding, fine-grained temporal reasoning, and robustness under distribution shift. In particular, models perform substantially better on salient progression categories such as worse than on temporally subtle states such as stable and resolved, suggesting limited modeling of longitudinal disease evolution in chest radiography.

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) in medical imaging aim to improve model interpretability by predicting intermediate clinical concepts before final diagnoses. However, most existing CBMs treat concepts as discriminative predictors of pathology labels, without explicitly modelling the underlying clinical generative process where diseases produce observable radiographic findings. We propose XpertCausal, a radiologist-guided causal CBM for chest X-ray interpretation which models pathology-to-concept relationships using a probabilistic noisy-OR framework. This generative model is then inverted via Bayesian inference to estimate pathology probabilities from predicted concepts. Radiologist-curated concept-pathology associations are used to constrain model structure to radiologist-defined clinically plausible reasoning pathways. We evaluate XpertCausal on MIMIC-CXR across pathology classification performance, calibration, explanation quality, and alignment with radiologist-defined reasoning pathways. Compared with both a non-causal CBM baseline and a causal ablation with unconstrained learned associations, XpertCausal achieves improved AUROC, calibration, and clinically relevant explanation quality, while learning concept-pathology relationships that more closely align with expert knowledge. These results demonstrate that incorporating clinically motivated causal structure and expert domain knowledge into CBMs can lead to more accurate, interpretable, and clinically aligned models for CXR interpretation.

When a chest X-ray shows consolidation but the question asks which finding is present, a medical vision-language model may answer "No consolidation." This is more than an incorrect choice: it is a polarity reversal that emits a clinical statement contradicting the image. We study this failure as negated-option attraction, where a model is drawn to a negated answer option even when it conflicts with both the visual evidence and the question. We introduce CXR-ContraBench (Chest X-Ray Contradiction Benchmark), a diagnostic benchmark spanning internal ReXVQA slices and external OpenI and CheXpert protocols. The benchmark centers on present-finding questions, where selecting "No X" despite visible X creates the main clinical risk, and uses absent-finding questions as secondary tests of whether models copy negated wording. Across CheXpert protocols, the failure is substantial and persistent. On a strict direct presence probe, MedGemma and Qwen2.5-VL reach only 31.49% and 30.21% accuracy, respectively; on a matched 135,754-record CheXpert training-split protocol, both models select negated options on over 62% of presence questions. Chain-of-thought prompting reduces some presence-side reversals but does not eliminate them and can amplify absence-side contradictions. Finally, QCCV-Neg (Question-Conditioned Consistency Verifier for Negation) deterministically repairs the measured polarity-confused subset without retraining, raising MedGemma and Qwen2.5-VL to 96.60% and 95.32% accuracy on the direct presence probe. These results show that standard accuracy can hide a clinically meaningful inference-time polarity failure. Source code and benchmark construction scripts are available at https://github.com/fangzr/cxr-contrabench-code.

Chest X-ray classification suffers from severe class imbalance where gradient updates bias toward majority classes, causing feature drift and poor performance on rare but critical pathologies. We propose a Momentum-Anchored Multi-Scale Fusion Network that uses exponential moving averages (EMA) as a temporal anchoring mechanism to stabilize feature representations under long-tailed distributions. Our approach applies selective momentum updates to the final expansion block of an EfficientNet backbone, creating a slowly-evolving reference branch that resists gradient-induced drift while preserving discriminative patterns for minority classes. Combined with multi-scale spatial fusion ($1\times 1$, $3 \times 3$, $5 \times 5$ convolutions), this anchoring strategy maintains representational stability throughout training. On ChestX-ray14, our method achieves 0.8682 average AUC, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches and showing particular improvements on rare pathologies like Hernia (0.9470) and Pneumonia (0.8165). The results demonstrate that momentum anchoring effectively counters feature instability in long-tailed medical image classification.

Purpose: Rapid and reliable diagnostic tools are crucial for managing respiratory diseases like COVID-19, where chest X-ray analysis coupled with artificial intelligence techniques has proven invaluable. However, most existing works on X-ray images have not considered lung segmentation, raising concerns about their reliability. Additionally, some have employed disproportionate and impractical augmentation techniques, making models less generalized and prone to overfitting. This study presents a critical analysis of both issues and proposes a methodology (SDL-COVID) for more reliable classification of chest X-rays for COVID-19 detection. Methods: We use class activation mapping to obtain a visual understanding of the predictions made by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), validating the necessity of lung segmentation. To analyze the effect of data augmentation, deep learning models are implemented on two levels: one for an augmented dataset and another for a non-augmented dataset. Results: Careful analysis of X-ray images and their corresponding heat maps under expert medical supervision reveals that lung segmentation is necessary for accurate COVID-19 prediction. Regarding data augmentation, test accuracy significantly drops beyond a certain threshold with additional augmented images, indicating model overfitting. Conclusion: Our proposed methodology, SDL-COVID, achieves a precision of 95.21% and a lower false negative rate, ensuring its reliability for COVID-19 detection using chest X-rays.

Chest X-ray interpretation is one of the most frequently performed diagnostic tasks in medicine and a primary target for AI development, yet current vision-language models are primarily trained on datasets of paired images and reports, not the cognitive processes and visual attention that underlie clinical reasoning. Here, we present CheXthought, a global, multimodal resource containing 103,592 chain-of-thought reasoning traces and 6,609,082 synchronized visual attention annotations across 50,312 multi-read chest X-rays from 501 radiologists in 71 countries. Our analysis reveals clinical reasoning patterns in how experts deploy distinct visual search strategies, integrate clinical context, and communicate uncertainty. We demonstrate the clinical utility of CheXthought across four dimensions. First, CheXthought reasoning significantly outperforms state-of-the-art vision-language model chain-of-thought in factual accuracy and spatial grounding. Second, visual attention data used as an inference-time hint recovers missed findings and significantly reduces hallucinations. Third, vision-language models trained on CheXthought data achieve significantly stronger pathology classification, visual faithfulness, temporal reasoning and uncertainty communication. Fourth, leveraging CheXthought's multi-reader annotations, we predict both human-human and human-AI disagreement directly from an image, enabling transparent communication of case difficulty, uncertainty and model reliability. These findings establish CheXthought as a resource for advancing multimodal clinical reasoning and the development of more transparent, interpretable vision-language models.

Federated learning enables collaborative model training across medical institutions without sharing raw data, but its performance is often limited by domain heterogeneity across clients. Existing approaches to address this challenge fall into two main paradigms: model-side personalization, which adapts model parameters to each client, and data-side harmonization, which reduces inter-client variation at the input level. Despite their widespread use, these strategies have not been systematically compared. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study across six medical imaging settings-colon polyp, skin lesion, and breast tumor segmentation, and tuberculosis CXR, brain tumor, and breast tumor classification-covering diverse types of domain shift. We evaluate a broad set of state-of-the-art harmonization and personalization methods under a unified framework. Our results reveal a conditional trade-off driven by the nature of heterogeneity: harmonization is more effective when variation is primarily appearance-based (e.g., CXR classification), while personalization performs better when differences are structural (e.g., colon polyp segmentation). When inter-client variation is limited, both strategies perform similarly. These findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of adaptation in federated medical imaging depends on the type and magnitude of domain shift rather than the strategy alone. We provide practical guidelines for selecting between harmonization and personalization and highlight directions for future hybrid approaches that combine both paradigms. Code is available at https://github.com/ChamaniS/WhenToAdapt.

We propose SparseContrast, a new framework that merges dynamic sparse attention with contrastive learning for medical imaging, with a focus on chest X-ray disease detection in low-data settings. Traditional contrastive learning methods rely on dense attention mechanisms, which are computationally expensive and often process redundant regions in medical images. To resolve this, SparseContrast introduces a sparse attention mechanism that selectively concentrates on diagnostically pertinent areas, markedly decreasing computational burden without compromising accuracy. The framework adaptively trims attention maps in the training phase, directed by a compact saliency predictor which concurrently optimizes sparsity and feature quality. This method not only speeds up training and inference by as much as 40% relative to dense attention benchmarks but also boosts diagnostic accuracy by focusing on areas of clinical importance. Moreover, the approach remains indifferent to the selection of backbone architecture, which permits its application to both convolutional and transformer-based models. Experiments show SparseContrast attains comparable or better performance in disease identification tasks with greater efficiency relative to current approaches. The proposed framework delivers a practical approach for implementing contrastive learning in medical imaging settings with limited resources, where computational efficiency and diagnostic accuracy are paramount.

Vision-language pretraining has driven progress in medical image representation learning, but it depends on paired image-text data and can inherit reporting bias from clinical narratives. We study whether language-free predictive pretraining can produce an image encoder that transfers effectively to radiology report generation. RadJEPA is a chest-X-ray adaptation of I-JEPA, pretrained on approximately 840K unlabeled radiographs using latent context-to-target prediction. Our primary contribution is an extensive empirical evaluation of this language-free encoder for report generation: the frozen image encoder is coupled to a trainable two-layer projector and language decoder, and is also substituted into four established vision-language backbones. Across MIMIC-CXR and IU-Xray, RadJEPA matches or exceeds the evaluated image-only and image-text baselines on lexical, entity-relation, and clinical-label metrics. Controlled MIMIC-only comparisons provide evidence that the predictive objective contributes beyond domain-specific pretraining, while broader comparisons also reflect differences in pretraining data, model capacity, and input resolution. Complementary classification and segmentation experiments assess transfer beyond report generation.

Chest X-ray (CXR) plays a pivotal role in clinical diagnosis, and a variety of task-specific and foundation models have been developed for automatic CXR interpretation. However, these models often struggle to adapt to new diagnostic tasks and complex reasoning scenarios. Recently, LLM-based agent models have emerged as a promising paradigm for CXR analysis, enhancing model's capability through tool coordination, multi-step reasoning, and team collaboration, etc. However, existing agents often rely on a single diagnostic pipeline and lack mechanisms for assessing tools' reliability, limiting their adaptability and credibility. To this end, we propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation, where a central director coordinates the following stages: (1) Tool Invocation: The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator (EDV), which grounds diagnostic outputs with visual evidence to support reliable downstream diagnosis; (2) Diagnostic Planning: Guided by task requirements and intermediate findings, the agent formulates a targeted diagnostic plan. It then assembles an expert team accordingly, defining member roles and coordinating their interactions to enable adaptive and collaborative reasoning; (3) Collaborative Decision-making: The agent integrates insights from the expert team with accumulated contextual memories, synthesizing them into an evidence-backed diagnostic conclusion. Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity. Code and data are valuable at this \href{https://github.com/laojiahuo2003/CXRAgent/}{link}.

Public datasets of Chest X-Rays (CXRs) have long been a popular benchmark for developing machine learning (ML) computer vision models in healthcare. However, the reported strong average-case performance of these models do not necessarily reflect their actual utility when used in heterogeneous clinical settings, potentially masking weaker performance in medically significant scenarios. In this work we use clinical context to provide a more holistic evaluation of models for CXR diagnosis. In particular, we use discharge summaries, recorded prior to each CXR, to derive a ``pre-CXR'' probability of each CXR label, as a proxy for existing contextual knowledge available to clinicians when interpreting CXRs. We use this measure to probe model performance along two dimensions: First, using a stratified analysis, we show that models tend to have lower performance (as measured by AUROC and other metrics) among individuals with higher pre-CXR probability. Second, by controlling for pre-CXR probability via matching and re-weighting, we demonstrate that performance degrades when the correlation is broken between prior context and the current CXR label, suggesting that model performance is highly sensitive to the underlying distribution of clinical context. Specifically, cases with high pre-test probabilities present a fundamentally more difficult visual classification task, highlighting a gap in clinical utility when models are applied to high-risk cohorts.

Latent Diffusion Models have shown remarkable results in text-guided image synthesis in recent years. In the domain of natural (RGB) images, recent works have shown that such models can be adapted to various vision-language downstream tasks with little to no supervision involved. On the contrary, text-to-image Latent Diffusion Models remain relatively underexplored in the field of medical imaging, primarily due to limited data availability (e.g., due to privacy concerns). In this work, focusing on the chest X-ray modality, we first demonstrate that a standard text-conditioned Latent Diffusion Model has not learned to align clinically relevant information in free-text radiology reports with the corresponding areas of the given scan. Then, to alleviate this issue, we propose a fine-tuning framework to improve multi-modal alignment in a pre-trained model such that it can be efficiently repurposed for downstream tasks such as phrase grounding. Our method sets a new state-of-the-art on a standard benchmark dataset (MS-CXR), while also exhibiting robust performance on out-of-distribution data (VinDr-CXR). We further validate our approach through a pilot qualitative study and an experiment on grounded disease classification. Our code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/vios-s.