AI Agent Benchmarks

Ask about this topic

Overview

AI agent benchmarks test systems that act over multiple steps, use tools, and respond to changing information, rather than only answer isolated questions. Researchers build executable environments for settings such as web search, coding, graphical interfaces, games, scientific workflows, and multi-agent coordination, then score outcomes with programmatic checks, expert rubrics, or simulated users. Increasingly, evaluations also inspect trajectories, evidence use, efficiency, safety, and recovery from errors. Agents can perform well on narrow tasks yet remain unreliable on long-horizon work, and results often depend strongly on the model, harness, environment, and grading method.

Latest papers

CardsList

1,503 papers271 papers in the last four weeks, up 91% on the four weeks before. 1.6% of all new papers.

Mar 9, 2026

Test-Driven AI Agent Definition (TDAD): Compiling Tool-Using Agents from Behavioral Specifications

We present Test-Driven AI Agent Definition (TDAD), a methodology that treats agent prompts as compiled artifacts: engineers provide behavioral specifications, a coding agent converts them into executable tests, and a second coding agent iteratively refines the prompt until tests pass. Deploying tool-using LLM agents in production requires measurable behavioral compliance that current development practices cannot provide. Small prompt changes cause silent regressions, tool misuse goes undetected, and policy violations emerge only after deployment. To mitigate specification gaming, TDAD introduces three mechanisms: (1) visible/hidden test splits that withhold evaluation tests during compilation, (2) semantic mutation testing via a post-compilation agent that generates plausible faulty prompt variants, with the harness measuring whether the test suite detects them, and (3) spec evolution scenarios that quantify regression safety when requirements change. We evaluate TDAD on SpecSuite-Core, a benchmark of four deeply-specified agents spanning policy compliance, grounded analytics, runbook adherence, and deterministic enforcement. Across 24 independent trials, TDAD achieves 92% v1 compilation success with 97% mean hidden pass rate; evolved specifications compile at 58%, with most failed runs passing all visible tests except 1-2, and show 86-100% mutation scores, 78% v2 hidden pass rate, and 97% regression safety scores. The implementation is available as an open benchmark at https://github.com/f-labs-io/tdad-paper-code.

Tzafrir Rehan

Fiverr Labs

Tool-Using AgentsAI Agent EvaluationSpecification-Based TestingAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoning

We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.

Krista Opsahl-Ong, Arnav Singhvi, Jasmine Collins +10

Databricks

Multi-Document QALLM Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksDocument QALLM GroundingTable QA
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

PostTrainBench: Can LLM Agents Automate LLM Post-Training?

AI agents have become surprisingly proficient at software engineering over the past year, largely due to improvements in reasoning capabilities. This raises a deeper question: can these systems extend their capabilities to automate AI research itself? In this paper, we explore post-training, the critical phase that turns base LLMs into useful assistants. We introduce PostTrainBench to benchmark how well LLM agents can perform post-training autonomously under bounded compute constraints (10 hours on one H100 GPU). We ask frontier agents (e.g., Claude Code with Opus 4.6) to optimize the performance of a base LLM on a particular benchmark (e.g., Qwen3-4B on AIME). Importantly, we do not provide any predefined strategies to the agents and instead give them full autonomy to find necessary information on the web, run experiments, and curate data. We find that frontier agents make substantial progress but generally lag behind instruction-tuned LLMs from leading providers: 23.2% for the best agent vs. 51.1% for official instruction-tuned models. However, agents can exceed instruction-tuned models in targeted scenarios: GPT-5.1 Codex Max achieves 89% on BFCL with Gemma-3-4B vs. 67% for the official model. We also observe several failure modes worth flagging. Agents sometimes engage in reward hacking: training on the test set, downloading existing instruction-tuned checkpoints instead of training their own, and using API keys they find to generate synthetic data without authorization. These behaviors are concerning and highlight the importance of careful sandboxing as these systems become more capable. Overall, we hope PostTrainBench will be useful for tracking progress in AI R&D automation and for studying the risks that come with it. Website and code are available at https://posttrainbench.com/.

Ben Rank, Hardik Bhatnagar, Ameya Prabhu +4

ELLIS Institute Tübingen · Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · Tübingen AI Center +2

LLM Post-TrainingAutonomous Research AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the financial domain is driving a paradigm shift from passive information retrieval to dynamic, agentic interaction. While general-purpose tool learning has witnessed a surge in benchmarks, the financial sector, characterized by high stakes, strict compliance, and rapid data volatility, remains critically underserved. Existing financial evaluations predominantly focus on static textual analysis or document-based QA, ignoring the complex reality of tool execution. Conversely, general tool benchmarks lack the domain-specific rigor required for finance, often relying on toy environments or a negligible number of financial APIs. To bridge this gap, we introduce FinToolBench, the first real-world, runnable benchmark dedicated to evaluating financial tool learning agents. Unlike prior works limited to a handful of mock tools, FinToolBench establishes a realistic ecosystem coupling 760 executable financial tools with 295 rigorous, tool-required queries. We propose a novel evaluation framework that goes beyond binary execution success, assessing agents on finance-critical dimensions: timeliness, intent type, and regulatory domain alignment. Furthermore, we present FATR, a finance-aware tool retrieval and reasoning baseline that enhances stability and compliance. By providing the first testbed for auditable, agentic financial execution, FinToolBench sets a new standard for trustworthy AI in finance. The tool manifest, execution environment, and evaluation code will be open-sourced to facilitate future research.

Jiaxuan Lu, Kong Wang, Yemin Wang +9

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Hunan University · Xiamen University +3

LLM Agent EvaluationTool-Using Language AgentsTool UseAI Agent BenchmarksFinance
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

UIS-Digger: Towards Comprehensive Research Agent Systems for Real-world Unindexed Information Seeking

Recent advancements in LLM-based information-seeking agents have achieved record-breaking performance on established benchmarks. However, these agents remain heavily reliant on search-engine-indexed knowledge, leaving a critical blind spot: Unindexed Information Seeking (UIS). This paper identifies and explores the UIS problem, where vital information is not captured by search engine crawlers, such as overlooked content, dynamic webpages, and embedded files. Despite its significance, UIS remains an underexplored challenge. To address this gap, we introduce UIS-QA, the first dedicated UIS benchmark, comprising 110 expert-annotated QA pairs. Notably, even state-of-the-art agents experience a drastic performance drop on UIS-QA (e.g., from 70.90 on GAIA and 46.70 on BrowseComp-zh to 24.55 on UIS-QA), underscoring the severity of the problem. To mitigate this, we propose UIS-Digger, a novel multi-agent framework that incorporates dual-mode browsing and enables simultaneous webpage searching and file parsing. With a relatively small ∼\sim30B-parameter backbone LLM optimized using SFT and RFT training strategies, UIS-Digger sets a strong baseline at 27.27%, outperforming systems integrating sophisticated LLMs such as O3 and GPT-4.1. This demonstrates the importance of proactive interaction with unindexed sources for effective and comprehensive information-seeking. Our work not only uncovers a fundamental limitation in current agent evaluation paradigms but also provides the first toolkit for advancing UIS research, defining a new and promising direction for robust information-seeking systems. The dataset has been released at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/UIS-Digger/UIS-QA.

Chang Liu, Chuqiao Kuang, Tianyi Zhuang +4

Huawei Technologies Ltd. · The University of Hong Kong · University College London

Agentic SearchWeb Search AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksMulti-Agent LLM Systems
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

PIRA-Bench: A Transition from Reactive GUI Agents to GUI-based Proactive Intent Recommendation Agents

Current Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents operate primarily under a reactive paradigm: a user must provide an explicit instruction for the agent to execute a task. However, an intelligent AI assistant should be proactive, which is capable of anticipating user intentions directly from continuous visual inputs, such as mobile or desktop screenshots, and offering timely recommendations without explicit user prompting. Transitioning to this proactive paradigm presents significant challenges. Real-world screen activity is rarely linear; it consists of long-horizon trajectories fraught with noisy browsing, meaningless actions, and multithreaded task-switching. To address this gap, we introduce PIRA-Bench (Proactive Intent Recommendation Agent Benchmark), a novel benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on continuous, weakly-supervised visual inputs. Unlike reactive datasets, PIRA-Bench features complex trajectories with multiple interleaved intents and noisy segments with various user profile contexts, challenging agents to detect actionable events while fitting to user preferences. Furthermore, we propose the PIRF baseline, a memory-aware, state-tracking framework that empowers general MLLMs to manage multiple task threads and handle misleading visual inputs. PIRA-Bench serves as an initial step toward robust and proactive GUI-based personal assistants.

Yuxiang Chai, Shunye Tang, Han Xiao +2

Nankai University · Huawei Research

GUI AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksMultimodal Agents
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

$OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?

As language models (LMs) evolve from chat assistants to long-horizon agents capable of multi-step reasoning and tool use, existing benchmarks remain largely confined to structured or exam-style tasks that fall short of real-world professional demands. To this end, we introduce $OneMillion-Bench ($OMB), a benchmark of 400 expert-curated tasks spanning Law, Finance, Industry, Healthcare, and Natural Science, built to evaluate agents across economically consequential scenarios. Unlike prior work, the benchmark requires retrieving authoritative sources, resolving conflicting evidence, applying domain-specific rules, and making constraint decisions, where correctness depends as much on the reasoning process as the final answer. We adopt a rubric-based evaluation protocol scoring factual accuracy, logical coherence, practical feasibility, and professional compliance, focusing on expert-level problems to ensure meaningful differentiation across agents. Together, $OMB provides a unified testbed for assessing agentic reliability, professional depth, and an indicator of practical readiness in domain-intensive scenarios.

Yang Liu, Jiaqi Li, Jun Bai +20

BIGAI · Humanlaya · xbench +1

LLM Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksAI Agent Reliability
AskPDF
Mar 6, 2026

ResearchEnvBench: Benchmarking Agents on Environment Synthesis for Research Code Execution

Autonomous agents are increasingly expected to support scientific research, and recent benchmarks report progress in code repair and autonomous experimentation. However, these evaluations typically assume a pre-configured execution environment, which requires resolving complex software dependencies, aligning hardware and framework versions, and configuring distributed execution, yet this capability remains largely unbenchmarked. We introduce ResearchEnvBench, a benchmark for environment synthesis in research code execution. Given a research repository, documentation, and a target execution setting, agents must construct an environment that successfully executes at runtime. Evaluations on diverse research repositories reveal a substantial gap in current SOTA agents, with failures dominated by incomplete dependency resolution and brittle version coupling. ResearchEnvBench provides a realistic testbed for advancing autonomous agents toward reproducible scientific research.

Yubang Wang, Chenxi Zhang, Bowen Chen +7

Shanghai Innovation Institution · College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University · OpenMOSS +5

AI Agent BenchmarksAutonomous Research AgentsAI-Assisted Scientific ResearchSoftware Engineering
AskPDF
Mar 6, 2026

DeepFact: Co-Evolving Benchmarks and Agents for Deep Research Factuality

Search-augmented LLM agents can produce deep research reports (DRRs), but verifying claim-level factuality remains challenging. Existing fact-checkers are primarily designed for general-domain, factoid-style atomic claims, and there is no benchmark to test whether such verifiers transfer to DRRs. Yet building such a benchmark is itself difficult. We first show that static expert-labeled benchmarks are brittle in this setting: in a controlled study with PhD-level specialists, unassisted experts achieve only 60.8% accuracy on a hidden micro-gold set of verifiable claims. We propose Evolving Benchmarking via Audit-then-Score (AtS), where benchmark labels and rationales are explicitly revisable: when a verifier disagrees with the current benchmark, it must submit evidence; an auditor adjudicates the dispute; and accepted revisions update the benchmark before models are scored. Across four AtS rounds, expert micro-gold accuracy rises to 90.9%, indicating experts are substantially more reliable as auditors than as one-shot labelers. We instantiate AtS as DeepFact-Bench, a versioned DRR factuality benchmark with auditable rationales, and DeepFact-Eval, a document-level verification agent (with a grouped lite variant) that outperforms existing verifiers on DeepFact-Bench and transfers well to external factuality datasets.

Yukun Huang, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Momchil Hardalov +3

Duke University · Amazon AGI · Boston University

Automated Fact-CheckingAI Agent BenchmarksFactual Consistency EvaluationBenchmark Auditing
AskPDF
Mar 6, 2026

The World Won't Stay Still: Programmable Evolution for Agent Benchmarks

LLM-powered tool-calling agents fulfill user requests by interacting with environments, querying data, and invoking tools in a multi-turn process. Yet, most existing benchmarks evaluate these systems under static environment interfaces, with fixed schemas and toolsets, making it difficult to assess how agents behave as environments evolves -- when capabilities are added, reorganized, or deprecated across successive environment versions. In this paper, we study structured environment evolution as a benchmark-construction problem for tool-calling agents. We propose ProEvolve, a graph-based framework that makes environment evolution programmable. At its core, a typed relational graph provides a unified, explicit representation of the environment - data, tools, and schema. Under this formalism, adding, removing, or modifying capabilities are expressed as graph transformations that coherently propagate updates across tools, schemas, and data access. Building on this, ProEvolve supports (1) automatic generation of evolved executable environments through explicit graph transformations, and (2) graph-grounded construction of task sandboxes via subgraph sampling and instantiation. We validate ProEvolve in two tool-calling domains, e-commerce and airline booking, in terms of quality, implementation validity, and failure modes. Finally, we use the generated benchmark as a downstream diagnostic to study how representative agents behave under structured environment evolution.

Guangrui Li, Yaochen Xie, Yi Liu +11

Amazon · UC Berkeley

AI Agent BenchmarksAgent EvaluationTool-Using Agents
AskPDF
Mar 5, 2026

TML-Bench: Benchmark for Data Science Agents on Tabular ML Tasks

Autonomous coding agents can produce strong tabular baselines quickly on Kaggle-style tasks. Practical value depends on end-to-end correctness and reliability under time limits. This paper introduces TML-Bench, a tabular benchmark for data science agents on Kaggle-style tasks. This paper evaluates 10 OSS LLMs on four Kaggle competitions and three time budgets (240s, 600s, and 1200s). Each model is run five times per task and budget. A run is successful if it produces a valid submission and a private-holdout score on hidden labels that are not accessible to the agent. This paper reports median performance, success rates, and run-to-run variability. MiniMax-M2.1 model achieves the best aggregate performance score on all four competitions under the paper's primary aggregation. Average performance improves with larger time budgets. Scaling is noisy for some individual models at the current run count. Code and materials are available at https://github.com/MykolaPinchuk/TML-bench/tree/master.

Mykola Pinchuk

Independent Researcher, San Jose, USA

AI Agent BenchmarksAgent BenchmarksAI Agent EvaluationAI Agent ReliabilityTabular ML
AskPDF
Mar 5, 2026

Tool-Genesis: A Task-Driven Tool Creation Benchmark for Self-Evolving Language Agent

Research on self-evolving language agents has accelerated, drawing increasing attention to their ability to create, adapt, and maintain tools from task requirements. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on predefined specifications, which limits scalability and hinders truly autonomous evolution. While recent studies attempt to dynamically generate tools, they primarily emphasize downstream performance, resulting in a "black-box" evaluation that makes it difficult to attribute failures to specific causes. To address this, we propose Tool-Genesis, a diagnostic benchmark designed to quantify agent capabilities across multiple dimensions, including interface compliance, functional correctness, and downstream utility. Tool-Genesis evaluates whether agents can construct task-relevant tools solely from abstract requirements (without preset specifications) and use them to solve realistic problems. Crucially, we find that even state-of-the-art models struggle to produce precise tool interfaces or executable logic in a one-shot setting. These minor initial flaws are amplified through the pipeline, leading to a sharp degradation in downstream metrics. We hope Tool-Genesis will guide future research toward training and steering models to synthesize persistent, general-purpose tools that better address real-world challenges.

Bowei Xia, Mengkang Hu, Shijian Wang +5

UESTC · The University of Hong Kong · Xiaohongshu Inc.

Tool-Using AgentsAI Agent BenchmarksSelf-Evolving AgentsLLM Agent Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 5, 2026

EigenData: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Platform for Function-Calling Data Synthesis, Auditing, and Repair

Function-calling agents -- large language models that invoke tools and APIs -- require high-quality, domain-specific training data spanning executable environments, backing databases, and diverse multi-turn trajectories. We introduce EigenData, an integrated, self-evolving platform that automates the full data lifecycle through a multi-agent architecture. A top-level orchestrator, EigenCore, coordinates three specialized sub-systems: DatabaseAgent for realistic domain database construction, CodingAgent for verified executable environment generation with iterative test-debug loops, and DataAgent for multi-turn trajectory synthesis with self-evolving prompt optimization. Cross-component feedback ensures consistency across all artifacts. We apply EigenData to audit and repair the Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard (BFCL-V3), identifying systematic errors in function schemas, implementations, and reference trajectories, automatically correcting them through coordinated schema refinement, code-level bug fixes, and trajectory modification, and introducing an outcome-aware evaluation protocol that assesses task success via database-state correctness rather than turn-level trajectory matching. We demonstrate that the repaired benchmark, coupled with outcome-aware metrics, produces model rankings substantially better correlated with human judgments of functional correctness.

Jiaao Chen, Jingyuan Qi, Mingye Gao +3

Eigen AI

Synthetic Data Generation for Language ModelsAI Agent BenchmarksTool UseAI Agent Auditing
AskPDF
Mar 5, 2026

Evaluating the Search Agent in a Parallel World

Integrating web search tools has significantly extended the capability of LLMs to address open-world, real-time, and long-tail problems. However, evaluating these Search Agents presents formidable challenges. First, constructing high-quality deep search benchmarks is prohibitively expensive, while unverified synthetic data often suffers from unreliable sources. Second, static benchmarks face dynamic obsolescence: as internet information evolves, complex queries requiring deep research often degrade into simple retrieval tasks due to increased popularity, and ground truths become outdated due to temporal shifts. Third, attribution ambiguity confounds evaluation, as an agent's performance is often dominated by its parametric memory rather than its actual search and reasoning capabilities. Finally, reliance on specific commercial search engines introduces variability that hampers reproducibility. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework, Mind-ParaWorld, for evaluating Search Agents in a Parallel World. Specifically, MPW samples real-world entity names to synthesize future scenarios and questions situated beyond the model's knowledge cutoff. A ParaWorld Law Model then constructs a set of indivisible Atomic Facts and a unique ground-truth for each question. During evaluation, instead of retrieving real-world results, the agent interacts with a ParaWorld Engine Model that dynamically generates SERPs grounded in these inviolable Atomic Facts. We release MPW-Bench, an interactive benchmark spanning 19 domains with 1,608 instances. Experiments across three evaluation settings show that, while search agents are strong at evidence synthesis given complete information, their performance is limited not only by evidence collection and coverage in unfamiliar search environments, but also by unreliable evidence sufficiency judgment and when-to-stop decisions-bottlenecks.

Jiawei Chen, Xintian Shen, Lihao Zheng +7

LLM Agent EvaluationWeb Search AgentsAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 4, 2026

iAgentBench: Benchmarking Sensemaking Capabilities of Information-Seeking Agents on High-Traffic Topics

With the emergence of search-enabled generative QA systems, users are increasingly turning to tools that browse, aggregate, and reconcile evidence across multiple sources on their behalf. Yet many widely used QA benchmarks remain answerable by retrieving a single relevant passage, making them poorly suited for measuring cross-source sensemaking, such as integrating evidence, tracking causal links, and resolving dependencies across facets of a topic. We present iAgentBench, a dynamic ODQA benchmark that targets these higher-level information needs while keeping questions natural and grounded in realistic information-seeking behavior. iAgentBench draws seed topics from real-world attention signals and uses common user intent patterns to construct user-like questions whose answers require combining evidence from multiple sources, not just extracting a single snippet. Each instance is released with traceable evidence and auditable intermediate artifacts that support contamination checks and enable fine-grained diagnosis of failures in retrieval versus synthesis. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that retrieval improves accuracy, but retrieval alone does not reliably resolve these questions, underscoring the need to evaluate evidence use, not just evidence access.

Preetam Prabhu Srikar Dammu, Arnav Palkhiwala, Tanya Roosta +1

University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA · UC Berkeley Berkeley, California, USA

AI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent EvaluationKnowledge-Intensive QAEvidence-Grounded QAMulti-Hop QAIR Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 3, 2026

Benchmarking Emergent Coordination in Large-Scale LLM Populations: An Evaluation Framework on the MoltBook Archive

As multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems scale, evaluating their emergent coordination dynamics becomes increasingly critical. However, current evaluation paradigms-focused on single agents or small, explicitly structured groups-fail to capture the self-organization and viral information dynamics that arise in large, decentralized populations. We introduce a systematic evaluation framework to benchmark role specialization, information diffusion, and cooperative task resolution in open agent environments. We demonstrate this framework on the MoltBook Observatory Archive, a dataset of 2.73M interactions among 90,704 autonomous agents, establishing quantitative baselines for emergent coordination. Our evaluation reveals a pronounced core-periphery structure (silhouette 0.91), heavy-tailed cascade distributions (α=2.57α= 2.57), and severe coordination overhead in decentralized task resolution (Cohen's d=−0.88d = -0.88 against a single-agent baseline). By providing standardized evaluation tasks and empirical baselines, our framework enables the rigorous comparison of future multi-agent protocols and establishes evaluation itself as an object of scientific study.

Brandon Yee, Pairie Koh

Management Lab, Yee Collins Research Group

Multi-Agent CoordinationLLM Agent EvaluationEmergent Behavior in Multi-Agent SystemsAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 3, 2026

Proact-VL: A Proactive VideoLLM for Real-Time AI Companions

Proactive and real-time interactive experiences are essential for human-like AI companions, yet face three key challenges: (1) achieving low-latency inference under continuous streaming inputs, (2) autonomously deciding when to respond, and (3) controlling both quality and quantity of generated content to meet real-time constraints. In this work, we instantiate AI companions through two gaming scenarios, commentator and guide, selected for their suitability for automatic evaluation. We introduce the Live Gaming Benchmark, a large-scale dataset with three representative scenarios: solo commentary, co-commentary, and user guidance, and present Proact-VL, a general framework that shapes multimodal language models into proactive, real-time interactive agents capable of human-like environment perception and interaction. Extensive experiments show Proact-VL achieves superior response latency and quality while maintaining strong video understanding capabilities, demonstrating its practicality for real-time interactive applications.

Weicai Yan, Yuhong Dai, Qi Ran +6

Zhejiang University · Shenzhen University · South China University of Technology +2

AI CompanionsVision-Language AgentsMultimodal AgentsAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 3, 2026

Valet: A Standardized Testbed of Traditional Imperfect-Information Card Games

AI algorithms for imperfect-information games are typically compared using performance metrics on individual games, making it difficult to assess robustness across game choices. Card games are a natural domain for imperfect information due to hidden hands and stochastic draws. To facilitate comparative research on imperfect-information game-playing algorithms and game systems, we introduce Valet, a diverse and comprehensive testbed of 21 traditional imperfect-information card games. These games span multiple genres, cultures, player counts, deck structures, mechanics, winning conditions, and methods of hiding and revealing information. To standardize implementations across systems, we encode the rules of each game in RECYCLE, a card game description language. We empirically characterize each game's branching factor and duration using random simulations, reporting baseline score distributions for a Monte Carlo Tree Search player against random opponents to demonstrate the suitability of Valet as a benchmarking suite.

Mark Goadrich, Achille Morenville, Éric Piette

Hendrix College, Conway AR 72032, USA · ICTEAM, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Imperfect-Information GamesAI Agent BenchmarksBenchmark Design
AskPDF
Mar 3, 2026

Agentified Assessment of Logical Reasoning Agents

We present a framework for evaluating and benchmarking logical reasoning agents when assessment itself must be reproducible, auditable, and robust to execution failures. Building on agentified assessment, we use an assessor agent to issue tasks, enforce execution budgets, parse outputs, and record structured failure types, while the agent under test only needs to expose a standardized agent-to-agent interface. As a case study, we benchmark an auto-formalization agent for first-order logic (FOL) reasoning on a solver-verified and repaired split of FOLIO. The agent translates natural language premises and conclusions into executable Z3Py programs and employs satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solving to determine logical entailment. On the cleaned FOLIO validation set, the auto-formalization agent achieves 86.70% accuracy under the assessor protocol, outperforming a chain-of-thought baseline (73.89%).

Zhiyu Ni, Yifeng Xiao, Zheng Liang

University of California, Berkeley

LLM Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksLogical ReasoningAutoformalization
AskPDF
Mar 3, 2026

SorryDB: Can AI Provers Complete Real-World Lean Theorems?

We present SorryDB, a dynamically-updating benchmark of open Lean tasks drawn from 78 real world formalization projects on GitHub. Unlike existing static benchmarks, often composed of competition problems, hillclimbing the SorryDB benchmark will yield tools that are aligned to the community needs, more usable by mathematicians, and more capable of understanding complex dependencies. Moreover, by providing a continuously updated stream of tasks, SorryDB mitigates test-set contamination and offers a robust metric for an agent's ability to contribute to novel formal mathematics projects. We evaluate a collection of approaches, including generalist large language models, agentic approaches, and specialized symbolic provers, over a selected snapshot of 1000 tasks from SorryDB. We show that current approaches are complementary: even though an agentic approach based on Gemini Flash is the most performant, it is not strictly better than other off-the-shelf large-language models, specialized provers, or even a curated list of Lean tactics.

Austin Letson, Leopoldo Sarra, Auguste Poiroux +9

Axiomatic AI · Math, Inc. · EPFL +8

Automated Theorem ProvingLean Theorem ProvingLarge Language Model-Guided Theorem ProvingAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 3, 2026

LiveAgentBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking of Agentic Systems Across 104 Real-World Challenges

As large language models grow more capable, general AI agents have become increasingly prevalent in practical applications. However, existing benchmarks face significant limitations, failing to represent real-world user tasks accurately. To address this gap, we present LiveAgentBench, a comprehensive benchmark with 104 scenarios that reflect real user requirements. It is constructed from publicly sourced questions on social media and real-world products. Central to our approach is the Social Perception-Driven Data Generation (SPDG) method, a novel process we developed to ensure each question's real-world relevance, task complexity, and result verifiability. We evaluate various models, frameworks, and commercial products using LiveAgentBench, revealing their practical performance and identifying areas for improvement. This release includes 374 tasks, with 125 for validation and 249 for testing. The SPDG process enables continuous updates with fresh queries from real-world interactions.

Hao Li, Huan Wang, Jinjie Gu +3

Ant Group

AI Agent EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksBenchmark Construction
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

TritonDFT: Automating DFT with a Multi-Agent Framework

Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a cornerstone of materials science, yet executing DFT in practice requires coordinating a complex, multi-step workflow. Existing tools and LLM-based solutions automate parts of the steps, but lack support for full workflow automation, diverse task adaptation, and accuracy-cost trade-off optimization in DFT configuration. To this end, we present TritonDFT, a multi-agent framework that enables efficient and accurate DFT execution through an expert-curated, extensible workflow design, Pareto-aware parameter inference, and multi-source knowledge augmentation. We further introduce DFTBench, a benchmark for evaluating the agent's multi-dimensional capabilities, spanning science expertise, trade0off optimization, HPC knowledge, and cost efficiency. TritonDFT provides an open user interface for real-world usage. Our website is at https://www.tritondft.com. Our source code and benchmark suite are available at https://github.com/Leo9660/TritonDFT.git.

Zhengding Hu, Kuntal Talit, Zhen Wang +8

University of California, San Diego · University of California, Merced · Los Alamos National Laboratory

Scientific Workflow AutomationDensity Functional TheoryComputational Materials ScienceAI Agent BenchmarksMulti-Agent Orchestration
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

Same Pieces, Different Servers: A Tetris Benchmark for AI Agents as Served

An agent meets a model as served: through an endpoint with a price card, a shared cache and other tenants, or on whatever hardware a self-hosted model runs. Benchmarks rank the weights. We introduce a Tetris benchmark that measures what agents get from models as served: every move is scored against an oracle, and every agent receives the same pieces. In five pre-specified experiments with nine open-weight models on one serverless provider, plus an open decision model self-hosted on a CPU, we find that price and size do not predict decision quality; that resending history costs almost nothing when cached input is free, would cost eleven to twelve times more if it were not, and makes play worse; that deployments keep between 4 and more than 64 agent contexts warm, in line with their throughput rather than the model's KV-cache size; that an agent's own long requests slow its slowest short decisions more than tenfold, which a simple admission rule cuts by 59% without hurting play; and that the decision model plays mid-pack but takes 27 s per move on a CPU, about 650 times longer than reported on a GPU. Architecture predicts some of what an agent sees; the deployment sets the rest.

Haochuan Wang

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

LLM Inference EfficiencyLLM Agent EvaluationLLM Inference ServingAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent Serving
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

Organizing, Orchestrating, and Benchmarking Agent Skills at Ecosystem Scale

The rapid proliferation of Claude agent skills has raised the central question of how to effectively leverage, manage, and scale the agent skill ecosystem. In this paper, we propose AgentSkillOS, the first principled framework for skill selection, orchestration, and ecosystem-level management. AgentSkillOS comprises two stages: (i) Manage Skills, which organizes skills into a capability tree via node-level recursive categorization for efficient discovery; and (ii) Solve Tasks, which retrieves, orchestrates, and executes multiple skills through DAG-based pipelines. To evaluate the agent's ability to invoke skills, we construct a benchmark of 30 artifact-rich tasks across five categories: data computation, document creation, motion video, visual design, and web interaction. We assess the quality of task outputs using LLM-based pairwise evaluation, and the results are aggregated via a Bradley-Terry model to produce unified quality scores. Experiments across three skill ecosystem scales (200 to 200K skills) show that tree-based retrieval effectively approximates oracle skill selection, and that DAG-based orchestration substantially outperforms native flat invocation even when given the identical skill set. Our findings confirm that structured composition is the key to unlocking skill potential. Our GitHub repository is available at:https://github.com/ynulihao/AgentSkillOS.

Hao Li, Chunjiang Mu, Jianhao Chen +5

Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

LLM Agent OrchestrationLLM Agent Skill RetrievalAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

Pencil Puzzle Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Verifiable Reasoning

We introduce Pencil Puzzle Bench, a framework for evaluating large language model reasoning through pencil puzzles, a family of constraint-satisfaction problems closely related to NP-complete problems, with deterministic, step-level verification. From a database of 62,231 puzzles across 94 varieties with verified unique solutions, we select a benchmark of 300 puzzles spanning 20 varieties and evaluate 51 models from 11 providers in two modes: direct ask (single-shot) and agentic (multi-turn with iterative verification). A key differentiator of our benchmark is that every intermediate board state can be checked against variety-specific constraints, localizing errors to the exact rule violated, providing the infrastructure for dense, per-move reward signals for process supervision and reinforcement learning. Our evaluation reveals two distinct axes of capability: (1) reasoning effort scaling, where GPT-5.2 improves 81x from no reasoning to maximum effort; and (2) agentic iteration, where Claude Opus 4.6 rises from 0.3% to 30.0% through iterative checking, while GPT-5.2@xhigh improves from 20.2% to 56.0%. Agentic attempts span a median of 29 turns over 17 minutes, with the longest exceeding 1,221 turns and 14.3 hours - a demanding test of long-context utilization, not just reasoning.

Justin Waugh

Approximate Labs

LLM EvaluationLLM ReasoningAI Agent BenchmarksConstraint Satisfaction
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

LiveCultureBench: a Multi-Agent, Multi-Cultural Benchmark for Large Language Models in Dynamic Social Simulations

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, yet evaluations focus primarily on task success rather than cultural appropriateness or evaluator reliability. We introduce LiveCultureBench, a multi-cultural, dynamic benchmark that embeds LLMs as agents in a simulated town and evaluates them on both task completion and adherence to socio-cultural norms. The simulation models a small city as a location graph with synthetic residents having diverse demographic and cultural profiles. Each episode assigns one resident a daily goal while others provide social context. An LLM-based verifier generates structured judgments on norm violations and task progress, which we aggregate into metrics capturing task-norm trade-offs and verifier uncertainty. Using LiveCultureBench across models and cultural profiles, we study (i) cross-cultural robustness of LLM agents, (ii) how they balance effectiveness against norm sensitivity, and (iii) when LLM-as-a-judge evaluation is reliable for automated benchmarking versus when human oversight is needed.

Viet-Thanh Pham, Lizhen Qu, Thuy-Trang Vu +2

Department of Data Science & AI, Monash University

AI Agent BenchmarksCross-Cultural Language Model EvaluationNormative Conformity in Language ModelsLarge Language Model-Based Social SimulationLLM-as-a-Judge
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

FT-Dojo: Towards Autonomous LLM Fine-Tuning with Language Agents

Fine-tuning large language models for vertical domains remains labor-intensive, requiring practitioners to curate data, configure training, and iteratively diagnose model behavior. Despite growing interest in autonomous machine learning and language agents, end-to-end LLM fine-tuning has not been systematically studied as an interactive agent task. We introduce FT-Dojo, an interactive benchmark environment for autonomous LLM fine-tuning, comprising 13 tasks across 5 domains. Rather than a new collection of static datasets, FT-Dojo standardizes a task interface, shared raw-data repository, sandboxed execution environment, structured feedback protocol, and held-out evaluation procedure. We further develop FT-Agent, a fine-tuning-oriented autonomous framework that uses structured iteration planning, fail-fast validation, and multi-level feedback analysis to refine data and training strategies. Experiments show that FT-Agent provides a strong initial baseline, achieving the best performance on 10 out of 13 tasks, with additional controlled comparisons against frontier agents, open-source planning backbones, and multi-run statistics supporting the main findings. Case studies show that agents can recover from failures through cumulative learning, while still exposing limitations in causal diagnosis and long-horizon planning. The implementation is available at https://github.com/microsoft/rd-agent.

Qizheng Li, Yifei Zhang, Xiao Yang +4

Microsoft Research Asia · Peking University · Nanjing University +1

LLM Fine-TuningAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent Training
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

CeProAgents: A Hierarchical Agents System for Automated Chemical Process Development

The development of chemical processes, a cornerstone of chemical engineering, presents formidable challenges due to its multi-faceted nature, integrating specialized knowledge, conceptual design, and parametric simulation. Capitalizing on this, we propose CeProAgents, a hierarchical multi-agent system designed to automate the development of chemical process through collaborative division of labor. Our architecture comprises three specialized agent cohorts focused on knowledge, concept, and parameter respectively. To effectively adapt to the inherent complexity of chemical tasks, each cohort employs a novel hybrid architecture that integrates dynamic agent chatgroups with structured agentic workflows. To rigorously evaluate the system, we establish CeProBench, a multi-dimensional benchmark structured around three core pillars of chemical engineering. We design six distinct types of tasks across these dimensions to holistically assess the comprehensive capabilities of the system in chemical process development. The results not only confirm the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed approach but also reveal the transformative potential as well as the current boundaries of Large Language Models (LLMs) for industrial chemical engineering.

Yuhang Yang, Ruikang Li, Jifei Ma +8

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China · Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China

Multi-Agent LLM SystemsLLM Agent OrchestrationAI Agent Benchmarks
AskPDF
Mar 2, 2026

ASTRA-bench: Evaluating Tool-Use Agent Reasoning and Action Planning with Personal User Context

Next-generation AI must manage vast personal data, diverse tools, and multi-step reasoning, yet most benchmarks remain context-free and single-turn. We present ASTRA-bench (Assistant Skills in Tool-use, Reasoning & Action-planning), a benchmark that uniquely unifies time-evolving personal context with an interactive toolbox and complex user intents. Our event-driven pipeline generates 2,413 scenarios across four protagonists, grounded in longitudinal life events and annotated by referential, functional, and informational complexity. Evaluation of state-of-the-art models (e.g., Claude-4.5-Opus, DeepSeek-V3.2) reveals significant performance degradation under high-complexity conditions, with argument generation emerging as the primary bottleneck. These findings expose critical limitations in current agents' ability to ground reasoning within messy personal context and orchestrate reliable multi-step plans. We release ASTRA-bench with a full execution environment and evaluation scripts to provide a diagnostic testbed for developing truly context-aware AI assistants.

Zidi Xiu, David Q. Sun, Kevin Cheng +9

Apple

Tool-Use EvaluationAI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent PlanningPersonal AI AgentsLLM Context Management
AskPDF
Mar 1, 2026

How Well Does Agent Development Reflect Real-World Work?

AI agents are increasingly developed and evaluated on benchmarks relevant to human work, yet it remains unclear how representative these benchmarking efforts are of the labor market as a whole. In this work, we systematically study the relationship between agent development efforts and the distribution of real-world human work by mapping benchmark instances to work domains and skills. We first analyze 43 benchmarks and 72,342 tasks, measuring their alignment with human employment and capital allocation across all 1,016 real-world occupations in the U.S. labor market. We reveal substantial mismatches between agent development that tends to be programming-centric, and the categories in which human labor and economic value are concentrated. Within work areas that agents currently target, we further characterize current agent utility by measuring their autonomy levels, providing practical guidance for agent interaction strategies across work scenarios. Building on these findings, we propose three measurable principles for designing benchmarks that better capture socially important and technically challenging forms of work: coverage, realism, and granular evaluation.

Zora Zhiruo Wang, Sanidhya Vijayvargiya, Aspen Chen +7

AI Agent BenchmarksAI and LaborAI Agent Evaluation
AskPDF