Approximation Algorithms

Fairness in clustering has attracted sustained research interest, motivated by the need to ensure equitable representation of protected groups in machine learning applications. We study fair $k$-means clustering in Euclidean space, where the proportion of each protected group in every cluster must lie within specified lower and upper bounds. These constraints make it challenging to determine both cluster centers and point assignments. We propose an approximation algorithm that combines a linear programming relaxation with geometric transformations of the input to construct candidate center sets. Given a $ρ$-approximate algorithm for weighted $k$-means and any $ε>0$, our algorithm returns a fractional solution whose cost is at most $1+(3-1/Γ)ρ+O(ε)$ times the optimal integral fair cost, where $Γ\approx6.357$ is an upper bound on the integrality gap of the standard Euclidean $k$-means LP. With a PTAS as the subroutine, the approximation ratio becomes $3.8427+O(ε)$, improving the previous factor of $5+O(ε)$ to below $4$. The solution satisfies all fairness constraints exactly and can be rounded to an integral assignment with a bounded additive violation of fairness and no increase in cost. The same approximation guarantee extends to the $k$-sparse Wasserstein barycenter problem.

Clustering is a fundamental class of data analysis techniques with the most important representatives being centroid-based methods like $k$-means. Such methods are strongly connected to quantization problems, which aim to approximate general probability measures with discrete ones. For example, $k$-means corresponds to quantization with respect to the Wasserstein distance. While Wasserstein quantization clusters points within a fixed space, this paper studies Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) quantization, which additionally aims at clustering the ambient geometry of the space. We show existence of solutions to the GW quantization problem and give a characterization that justifies an analogue to the $k$-means algorithm (Lloyd's algorithm) to approximate them numerically. We further calculate the quantization rate for usual Euclidean geometries that are used in the GW context, and relate it to standard Wasserstein quantization rates. Finally, numerical experiments show that GW quantization opens up many modeling possibilities beyond normal clustering methods (e.g., for geodesic distances of 3D shapes or structured pruning of neural networks) and that the introduced algorithm leads to useful numerical solutions with approximation quality often in line with theoretically optimal rates.

The $k$-means++ algorithm is a standard and widely used seeding method for $k$-means clustering, but for a fixed number $k$ of centers its worst-case expected approximation ratio is $Θ(\log k)$. We consider the same algorithm when an adversary first fixes the dataset and some $K$; the number of centers $k$ is then chosen uniformly from $\{K,\ldots,2K-1\}$. We prove that $k$-means++ is an $O(1)$-approximation with constant probability in this budget-smoothed setup.

Motivated by the numerical computation of the Mean Escape Time (MET) $τ:Ω\to\mathbb{R}$ of a stochastic process from a bounded domain $Ω\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d$, we study elliptic Dirichlet boundary value problems (BVPs) using boundary-enforced Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), in which the Dirichlet condition is imposed exactly by multiplying the network output with a predefined distance-to-boundary approximation $ρ$. Combining approximation-theoretic and statistical-learning arguments for Rectified Quadratic Unit (ReQU) and hyperbolic tangent (tanh) networks, we derive a priori error bounds that make explicit the dependence on $ρ$. In particular, we show that exact boundary enforcement alone is not enough for $H^2(Ω)$ error bounds, and that a sufficient and essentially necessary condition is for $ρ$ to be a smooth distance approximation $\textit{normalized to first order}$, of the kind constructed in arXiv:2104.08426 [math.NA]. We thereby identify this subclass of $\textit{boundary-adapted}$ PINNs as the appropriate neural network ansatz for solving Dirichlet BVPs. Numerical experiments support the theory, showing that appropriate choices of $ρ$ improve accuracy and convergence, while poorly chosen distance functions can substantially degrade the solution. Our proof also yields new VC-dimension bounds for hypothesis spaces of higher-order derivatives of ReQU and tanh networks, together with new approximation bounds for shallow ReQU networks in higher-order Sobolev norms, all of which are of important independent interest.

In this work, we study various graph partitioning problems under a general demand model. In each such task, we are given a graph $G=(V,E,c,w)$ with a capacity function $c\colon E\to \mathbb{N}$ and a demand function $w\colon V\times V\to \mathbb{N}$. Our main focus is the problem of finding a cut $(S, \bar{S})$ minimizing the quantity $$ψ_w( S ) = \frac{c( S, \bar{S} )}{w( S, V )\cdot w( \bar{S}, V )}.$$ Here, $c( S, \bar{S} )$ is the cost of edges between $S$ and the complement of $S$, $\bar{S}$, and $w( S, V )=w( S )+w( S, \bar{S} )$ is the sum of the internal demand within $S$, $w( S )$, and the demand between vertices of $S$ and $\bar{S}$, $w( S, \bar{S} )$. We call $ψ_w( S )$ the \emph{generalized conductance} of the cut $(S, \bar{S})$, and the task of minimizing $ψ_w( S )$ the Generalized Conductance Problem. Our main contribution is an algorithm with an $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$-approximation guarantee for this objective. Our result is achieved via a two-way reduction: first to the well-known Generalized $k$-Multicut Problem, and then to a constrained variant of the classic Sparsest-Cut Problem, with an additional upper-bound constraint on the amount of demand that may be cut. Moreover, we show that the above procedure can be used to obtain an $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$-bicriteria approximation for Graph Partitioning with Demands, where the goal is to find a minimum-cost subset of edges $C$ such that for every component $H$ of $G\setminus C$, $w( H )\leq ρ\cdot w( V )$. This, in turn, yields an $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$-approximation for Hierarchical Clustering with Demands, the problem of finding a hierarchy of cuts that partitions the graph into increasingly refined clusters. For multiplicative demand functions, we improve these guarantees to $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\log n})$ and for trees we get an $\mathcal{O}(1)$-approximation for all of our objectives.

Consider the following variation on the Hierarchical Clustering problem: Usually, while building a hierarchical clustering, one recursively partitions the data until each cluster becomes a singleton. We relax the halting condition of the recursive process to stop whenever the remaining cluster is a graph belonging to a class $\mathcal{F}$. We call this problem Hierarchical $\mathcal{F}$-Clustering and we measure the quality of any solution using adapted Dasgupta's clustering objective. We study two natural choices of $\mathcal{F}$: trees and graphs of bounded diameter. We present the first polynomial time $\mathcal{O}(\log n\cdot\log\log n)$ and $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$-approximation algorithms for clustering into trees and bounded diameter graphs respectively. Our main technical contribution is a framework for approximating such problems based on linear programming. In fact, we characterize graphs classes $\mathcal{F}$ for which our approach can be applied and show that it includes both trees and bounded diameter graphs. However, our ideas are not limited to them and might be useful for other structures as well. Broadly speaking, our framework applies whenever the corresponding flat clustering problem, which we call $p_{\mathcal{F}}$-Partitioning, admits a natural ILP formulation together with a rounding procedure with provable approximation guarantees. Intuitively, given a set of vertices called terminals, the problem is to find an edge set whose removal results in satisfying certain vertex-dependent structural predicate for each terminal. We then use these ingredients to build clustering trees with the aforementioned approximation guarantees. To complement these results, we show that both Hierarchical Clustering into trees and into bounded diameter graphs cannot be approximated within any constant factor under the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis.

Active learning studies the fundamental question: what data should we choose to observe? The greedy algorithm in optimal experiment design is a common heuristic and also equivalent to myopic Bayesian active learning for linear regression, the common framework where long-term planning is replaced with the one-step optimal choice. In this work, we prove a first-of-its-kind approximation ratio for the greedy algorithm's risk that is tight up to an absolute constant. The approximation ratio is linear in the maximum initial leverage score (MILS), a newly identified quantity fundamental to the greedy algorithm's performance. Finally, we illustrate the results with simple numerical simulations.

Submodular maximization is an important building block for developing algorithms in many areas such as machine learning and data mining. Due to the NP-hardness of the problem, analysis of submodular maximization algorithms typically provides pessimistic worst-case approximation factors only. It is not easy to evaluate how close a produced solution is to an optimal one for a given problem instance. In this paper, we develop new data-dependent upper bounds for submodular maximization with a knapsack constraint. We theoretically prove that they dominate the optimal solution and empirically demonstrate their advantages in certifying how close to optimal a solution is through experiments with real-world datasets.

Score-based Generative Models (SGMs) have achieved impressive performance in data generation across a wide range of applications. While the statistical properties of their sampling procedures are increasingly well understood, the optimization dynamics underlying their training remain less explored. SGMs are typically trained by minimizing a weighted denoising scorematching objective, yet optimization guarantees with stochastic gradients remain limited. In this work, we study Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) for SGMs, contributing results in two complementary regimes. First, for general score parameterizations, we establish a non-convex convergence rate for SGD on the weighted denoising score-matching objective, with explicit dependence on the schedule-dependent weighting factors. Second, for overparameterized two-layer ReLU networks, we develop a Neural Tangent Kernel analysis tailored to diffusion training with stochastic gradients, yielding score-approximation error bounds along the SGD trajectory. Finally, our analysis quantifies the role of the reweighting factor in the score approximation error, providing theoretical guidance for weighting choices used in practice.

The Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) has long served as a benchmark for evaluating the strength of optimization techniques in the classical theory of algorithms. In recent efforts to apply ML to algorithmic problems, TSP has also become a natural testbed for the development of ML-based techniques. A common approach is to train a neural network to output a heatmap estimating the likelihood of each edge to be part of the optimal tour; however, converting such a heatmap into an actual tour remains a non-trivial and often computationally intensive step. In this work, we propose algorithms for transforming heatmaps into tours with theoretical guarantees linking the achieved approximation ratio to the quality of the provided heatmap. In the spirit of algorithms with predictions, our results can be described as $(1+2\fracη{\mathrm{OPT}})$-approximation algorithms, where $η$ denotes the L1 distance between the prediction (heatmap) and an optimal solution (tour). Since the previous works lack such explicit guarantees, we compare our approach against them experimentally.

The silhouette is one of the most widely used measures to assess the quality of a $k$-clustering of a dataset of $n$ elements. Its evaluation requires no information beyond the clustering assignment. In addition, the silhouette is extremely easy to interpret, providing a score to measure the quality of a clustering as a whole or for each element. The exact computation of the: (i) silhouette of each element of a dataset; and (ii) the global silhouette of the clustering; require $Θ(n^2)$ distance calculations, under general metrics. The quadratic complexity $Θ(n^2)$ is extremely prohibitive, especially on massive modern datasets. Surprisingly, existing approximate methods using $O(n^2)$ distance calculations are heuristics not offering provable and controllable guarantees on the quality of their results. We introduce the first rigorous and efficient algorithms to estimate: (i) the (local) silhouette of each element of a dataset; and (ii) the (global) silhouette; of any metric $k$-clustering. Our methods, based on sampling, perform $O(nk\varepsilon^{-2}\ln (nk/δ))$ distance computations, and provide estimates with additive error $O(\varepsilon)$ with probability at least $1-δ$. That is, parameters $\varepsilon$ and $δ$ in $(0,1)$ control the trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. We also introduce a scalable and distributed design of our methods for the MapReduce and Massively Parallel Computing (MPC) frameworks. Our distributed algorithms use a constant number of rounds and sublinear local memory. Finally, we perform extensive experiments against state-of-the-art approaches. The results show that our new techniques yield the best trade-off between accuracy and efficiency for both local and global silhouette estimation. In addition, our methods scale efficiently to massive datasets for which an exact computation of the silhouette is not practical.

Classical approximation theorems ask for a new neural network whenever the target accuracy is improved. This paper studies the opposite possibility: can the network be chosen once and for all, and can accuracy be bought only by letting it run longer? We prove that this is possible for every continuous function on [-1,1]. More precisely, each such function is uniformly approximated by the time evolution of a single ReLU recurrent neural network with fixed weights and fixed hidden dimension. The mechanism behind the construction is a new intermediate model, the Turing machine with neural units (TMNU). This model retains the algorithmic freedom needed to implement polynomial approximation schemes, while remaining rigid enough to be simulated by RNNs with explicit bounds on hidden dimension and weight magnitude. The resulting convergence rates reflect the underlying polynomial approximation rates. We complement the construction with minimax lower bounds showing that runtime is not merely a proof artifact, but an unavoidable resource in this fixed-network approximation paradigm.

Quantum chemistry simulations underpin modern materials discovery, yet their impact is limited by steep computational cost and dependence on fixed approximation schemes. Foundation models, such as machine-learned interatomic potentials, have accelerated parts of this workflow, but their reliance on large-scale pretraining restricts adaptability at the frontier of chemical space, where methodological innovation and sparse data are the norm. Agentic AI systems can automate existing simulation pipelines, yet they remain constrained by the predefined tools and algorithms they orchestrate. In response, we introduce LADeQ, an LLM-guided workflow that discovers, implements, and benchmarks candidate approximation algorithms at test-time within existing quantum chemistry codes. Rather than selecting from a predefined repertoire, LADeQ constructs candidate approximation schemes on demand, drawing on techniques from disciplines such as spatial statistics, circuit simulation, and kernel methods that have had little prior presence in electronic-structure theory. Because it builds on an out-of-the-box language model, LADeQ requires no task-specific pretraining or curated data, and the resulting implementations are transparent and inspectable, with explicitly traceable approximation errors that enable principled control of accuracy--efficiency trade-offs. We show that LADeQ accelerates coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) and configuration interaction singles and doubles (CISD) calculations while keeping correlation-energy errors within user-specified tolerances, demonstrating autonomous, objective-driven discovery of approximation algorithms inside existing electronic-structure solvers.

Recovering dynamical systems from noisy observations is a recurring challenge across scientific domains, including neuroscience and physics. Latent stochastic differential equations (SDEs) address this by modeling the system as an unobserved state that evolves according to a learnable SDE and generates the observations. Variational inference (VI) provides a tractable objective for fitting latent SDEs. Traditional VI algorithms evaluate this objective by numerical simulation over a time discretization, trading fidelity for computational cost. A recent class of algorithms, simulation-free VI, sidesteps this tradeoff by parameterizing the posterior through its instantaneous marginals rather than its drift. In this work, we show that the efficiency of existing simulation-free VI algorithms comes at a price: their parameterizations restrict the approximate posterior to a subset of the SDEs available to simulation-based methods, degrading posterior inference and parameter learning. We propose Helmholtz-SDE, a simulation-free VI algorithm that closes this gap by optimizing over path laws compatible with a prescribed collection of marginals. Helmholtz-SDE recovers dynamics more faithfully than prior simulation-free methods, with the largest gains under high posterior uncertainty. It further matches the performance of simulation-based VI at a fraction of the runtime.

A significant gap exists between theory and practice in deep learning. Generalization and approximation error bounds are often derived for simplified models or are too loose to be informative. Many rely on the manifold hypothesis and on geometric regularity such as intrinsic dimension, curvature, and reach. Progress requires insight into data-manifold geometry and suitable benchmarks, yet existing options are polarized: analytic manifolds with known geometry but limited applicability, or real-world datasets where geometry is only coarsely estimable. We introduce a benchmarking framework for studying data geometry. We repurpose and extend dSprites and COIL-20 with additional transformation dimensions and dense, axis-aligned sampling, and pair them with finite-difference estimators that recover curvature, reach, and volume at near-ground-truth accuracy in a regime where general-purpose estimators are unreliable or difficult to deploy. The framework is intended as a controlled testbed, useful as a calibration environment for geometric estimators and a sandbox for probing theoretical assumptions. To illustrate its use, we present two application studies, namely assessing the scaling behavior of the bounds of Genovese et al. and Fefferman et al., and tracking the layer-wise geometry of a $β$-VAE, highlighting the behavior of current bounds and the value of controlled benchmarks for guiding and validating future theory. A reference implementation is available at https://github.com/koulakis/manifold-microscope.

Recently, Antoniadis et al. (ICLR 2025) proposed a framework for incorporating predictions to approximate NP-hard selection problems. Despite its simplicity, this approach tightly matches theoretical lower bounds, making its generalization highly compelling. We address an open question raised in the work of Antoniadis et al., concerning the extension of this approach to other important problems outside the class of selection problems, such as scheduling. We develop a learning-augmented algorithm for the makespan minimization problem on unrelated machines, denoted by $R\|C_{\max}$. By using predictions of heavy job assignments, we achieve a polynomial-time $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation for accurate predictions that smoothly degrades to a worst-case 2-approximation as the error increases. We conclude our work with an empirical analysis of our method.

A central principle in quantum machine learning is that an ansatz should be expressive enough to represent the quantum data of interest. Yet, the expressibility is statistically meaningful only insofar as it can be learned from finitely many copies of an unknown quantum state. In this work, we develop an information-theoretic Occam theory for quantum data generated by finite-size quantum circuits. For the class $S_{n,G}$ of $n$-qubit pure states preparable with at most $G$ two-qubit gates, a metric-entropy argument gives the realizable sample law $\widetildeΘ(G/ε^2)$ in the circuit-limited regime. For an arbitrary source $\hatρ$, we introduce the best $G$-gate approximation error $d_G(\hatρ)$ and the approximate circuit complexity $C_η(\hatρ)$. We prove an agnostic quantum Occam theorem: with $M$ copies, one can learn up to the best $G$-gate approximation error plus a statistical penalty $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{G/M})$. We then remove the need to know $G$ in advance through an adaptive model-selection theorem whose oracle inequality selects the circuit complexity justified by the data. Matching lower bounds yield a sample-supported expressibility law: at trace-distance accuracy $ε$, $M$ samples can support only $G_{\rm supported} \simeq Mε^2$ gates, up to logarithmic factors and tomography saturation at $2^n$. Thus, the circuit complexity becomes an adaptive statistical resource rather than a static promise. Our framework turns bounded circuit complexity into a model-selection principle for quantum machine learning.

Consistency is an important property in dynamic submodular maximization and entails maintaining a near-optimal solution at all times, making only a small number of adjustments to the solution in each step. Prior work has explored this question for the insertion-only case, where the algorithm faces a stream of $n$ insertions, and has established lower and upper bounds for the cardinality-constrained version of the problem. We consider this question in the fully dynamic setting, where the stream of operations may contain both insertions and deletions. We develop a general framework for designing algorithms for this setting, and instantiate it to obtain the first constant-factor approximations with sublinear consistency. For cardinality constraints, we propose a $\frac 12 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation that is $O\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent. For rank-$k$ matroid constraints, we construct a $\frac 14 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation to the dynamic optimum that is $O\left(\frac{\log k}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent.

One-shot block drafters for speculative decoding generate the full draft in a single forward pass, achieving strong throughput by eliminating sequential token generation. However, they predict each draft token conditioned only on the prefix context, with no dependence on previously drafted tokens. This non-autoregressive conditioning causes the drafter's distribution to diverge from the verifier's true autoregressive distribution as draft depth grows. This problem becomes more severe in tree-based drafting, where distinct branches are forced to share the same marginal distribution for subsequent tokens. We propose TreeFlash, which addresses this by incorporating an MLP layer conditioned on the drafter's hidden state and the previous token to approximate an autoregressive distribution. TreeFlash retains the $\mathcal{O}(1)$ decoding time complexity of one-shot drafters by employing a two-stage approximation mechanism. TreeFlash achieves state-of-the-art performance across a variety of tasks and models, improving over marginal tree drafting by $12\%$ higher block efficiency and $9\%$ higher speedup.

Inspired by the function-space theory of neural networks, we formulate and analyze a variation space for nonlinear operators between Hilbert spaces, defined through vector-valued Borel measures of bounded variation. We characterize its unit ball as the closed convex hull of a vector-valued single-neuron dictionary in Bochner spaces. For the ReLU activation, the bounded linear operators in this space are precisely the Schatten-$1$ operators, with equivalent norms. For operators in this space, we establish encoder--decoder approximation bounds in the Bochner $L^q$-norm, where the error decomposes into input and output encoding errors and a finite-width term of order $N^{-1/2}$. Under sub-Gaussian assumptions on the input and noise, we further derive high-probability generalization bounds for empirical least squares over path-norm-constrained encoder--decoder networks; the finite-sample contribution to the squared prediction error is of order $K^{-1/2}$ up to logarithmic factors. The finite-width and finite-sample constants are independent of the encoding dimensions and bases, with the latter also independent of the network width. When the encoding errors decay algebraically, these bounds yield algebraic approximation and learning rates, in contrast to the complexity barriers for Lipschitz and Fréchet differentiable operator classes.

The $2 \rightarrow q$ norm of a matrix $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ is defined as $\lVert X \rVert_{2 \rightarrow q} = \sup_{\lVert v \rVert_2 = 1} \lVert Xv \rVert_q$. We give polynomial-time multiplicative approximation algorithms for this norm when $q > 2$ (i.e. in the hypercontractive setting). This problem either directly captures or is closely related to long-standing open problems in combinatorial optimization and hardness of approximation (e.g. Small Set Expansion), quantum information (e.g. Best Separable State), and algorithmic statistics. Very little is known about what approximation factors we can achieve for this problem in polynomial time, even though such approximations have significant downstream consequences. Barak, Brandão, Harrow, Kelner, Steurer, and Zhou showed that no polynomial-time algorithm can achieve an approximation factor better than $2^{\sqrt{\log n}}$, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (FOCS'12). On the other hand, a simple spectral algorithm gives a $d^{1/4}$-approximation as a baseline. We give, to the best of our knowledge, the first polynomial-time approximation algorithm beating this baseline by polynomial factors. For the important special case of $q = 4$ it achieves a $d^{1/8}$-approximation. All previous algorithms required additional assumptions on $X$, or only surpassed the baseline for small values of $n$. Moreover, we construct sum-of-squares certificates for the $2 \rightarrow q$ norm. This directly implies improved algorithms for robust mean and covariance estimation, robust regression, and clustering, when the data only satisfies a bound on its $q$-th moment.

Learning-augmented algorithms have emerged as a powerful paradigm to surpass traditional worst-case lower bounds by integrating potentially noisy predictions. While this framework has seen success in online scheduling, existing work primarily optimizes job latency while relying on frequent, ``blind'' preemptions. This ignores the fundamental trade-off between algorithmic performance and preemption complexity. We provide the first systematic study of learning-augmented scheduling that curbs preemption while optimizing latency. We establish that the gap between theoretical latency bounds and preemption overhead can be bridged with solid analytical foundations. Our results include $O(1)$-competitive algorithms for single and unrelated parallel machines with only $O(1)$ preemptions per job under accurate predictions, with overhead scaling logarithmically with the prediction error. By providing the first bounded-preemption guarantees for unrelated and malleable machines, we extend the theoretical reach of the learning-augmented framework to more constrained and realistic settings. Finally, our algorithms are validated through experiments.

In the graph label selection problem, one is given an $n$-vertex graph and a budget $k$, and seeks to select $k$ vertices whose labels enable accurate prediction of the labels on the remaining vertices. This problem formalizes distilling a small representative set from the whole graph. We present the first $\tilde{O}(\log^{1.5} n)$-approximation algorithm for graph label selection under the standard budget constraint. Prior work either relies on resource augmentation, allowing substantially more than $k$ labeled vertices, or consists primarily of heuristics without provable guarantees. Finally, we demonstrate that practical heuristic variants of our algorithm scale to significantly larger graphs than previous methods, while essentially retaining their quality.

Matrix product operator Born machines (MPO-BMs) are tractable tensor-network models for probabilistic modeling, but their efficient approximation capability remains unclear. We characterize this boundary from both negative and positive perspectives. First, we prove that KL approximation is NP-hard for MPO-BMs in the continuous setting, ruling out universal efficient approximation in the worst case. Second, for score-based variational inference, we show that, under a locality and spectral-gap conditions on the loss-induced Hamiltonian, structured targets (e.g., path-graph Markov random fields) admit MPO-BM approximations with polynomial bond dimension and provable KL guarantees. Third, under the same locality structure, we prove that polynomially many score queries suffice to estimate the induced Hamiltonian and obtain such guarantees. Our results provide a theoretical characterization of when MPO-BMs are fundamentally hard to approximate and when they become efficiently learnable.

We present an accelerated relax-and-round algorithm for concave coverage problems, which generalize the classic maximum coverage problem. Building on the relax-and-round framework of Barman et al. [STACS 2021], we propose two significant improvements. First, we replace the linear programming (LP) relaxation step with a projected accelerated gradient method applied to a smooth surrogate objective to achieve a $\widetilde{O}(mn \varepsilon^{-1})$ running time. Second, we use a specialized rounding scheme for the hypersimplex that combines the Carathéodory decomposition algorithm in Karalias et al. [NeurIPS 2025] with randomized swap rounding of Chekuri et al. [FOCS 2010]. We prove tight approximation ratios for new reward functions, including a $0.827$-approximation for the logarithmic reward $\varphi(x) = \log(1 + x)$. Finally, we conduct maximum multi-coverage experiments on synthetic and real-world graphs, demonstrating that our algorithm outperforms approaches that use state-of-the-art LP solvers.

Polytrees are a subclass of Bayesian networks that seek to capture the conditional dependencies between a set of $n$ variables as a directed forest and are motivated by their more efficient inference and improved interpretability. Since the problem of learning the best polytree is NP-hard, we study which restrictions make it more tractable by considering for example in-degree bounds, properties of score functions measuring the quality of a polytree, and approximation algorithms. We devise an algorithm that finds the optimal polytree in time $O((2+ε)^n)$ for arbitrarily small $ε> 0$ and any constant in-degree bound $k$, improving over the fastest previously known algorithm of time complexity $O(3^n)$. We further give polynomial-time algorithms for finding a polytree whose score is within a factor of $k$ from the optimal one for arbitrary scores and a factor of $2$ for additive ones. Many of the results are complemented by (nearly) tight lower bounds for either the time complexity or the approximation factors.

In low-depth implementations of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), the dominant cost is often the number of objective evaluations rather than circuit depth. We introduce a graph-conditioned trust-region method for reducing this query cost. A graph neural network predicts a Gaussian distribution N(mu, Sigma) over QAOA angles. The mean initializes a local optimizer, the covariance defines an ellipsoidal trust region that constrains the search, and the predicted uncertainty determines an instance-dependent evaluation budget. Thus the learned distribution defines a search policy rather than only an initial parameter estimate. Under explicit assumptions on local smoothness, curvature, calibration, and noise, we derive bounds on objective degradation within the trust region, lower bounds on gradient variance, preservation of expected objective ordering under depolarizing noise, and finite-sample coverage guarantees. We evaluate the method for MaxCut at depth p = 2 on Erdos-Renyi, 3-regular, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz graphs with n = 8-16 vertices. Relative to random restarts and the strongest learned point-prediction baseline, the method reduces the mean number of circuit evaluations from 343 and 85 to 45 +/- 7, while maintaining sampled approximation ratios within 3 percentage points of concentration-based heuristics. The method does not improve absolute approximation ratios; its advantage is reduced query cost at comparable solution quality. The predictive uncertainty is calibrated in the experiments, with ECE = 0.052 and Spearman correlation rho = 0.770, and the learned trust regions transfer to graph sizes not used during training. The results identify a low-depth, query-dominated regime in which graph-conditioned trust regions reduce the query cost of QAOA without modifying the ansatz.

The k-means problem is perhaps the classical clustering problem and often synonymous with Lloyd's algorithm (1957). It has become clear that Hartigan's algorithm (1975) gives better results in almost all cases, Telgarsky-Vattani note a typical improvement of $5\%$ -- $10\%$. We point out that a very minor variation of Hartigan's method leads to another $2\%$ -- $5\%$ improvement; the improvement tends to become larger when either dimension or $k$ increase.

We study discrete k-clustering problems in general metric spaces that are constrained by a combination of two different fairness conditions within the demographic fairness model. Given a metric space (P,d), where every point in P is equipped with a protected attribute, and a number k, the goal is to partition P into k clusters with a designated center each, such that a center-based objective function is minimized and the attributes are fairly distributed with respect to the following two fairness concepts: 1) group fairness: We aim for clusters with balanced numbers of attributes by specifying lower and upper bounds for the desired attribute proportions. 2) diverse center selection: Clusters have natural representatives, i.e., their centers. We ask for a balanced set of representatives by specifying the desired number of centers to choose from each attribute. Dickerson, Esmaeili, Morgenstern and Zhang (2023) denote the combination of these two constraints as doubly constrained fair clustering. They present algorithms whose guarantees depend on the best known approximation factors for either of these problems. Currently, this implies an 8-approximation with a small additive violation on the group fairness constraint. For k-center, we improve this approximation factor to 4 with a small additive violation. This guarantee also depends on the currently best algorithm for DS-fair k-center given by Jones, Nguyen and Nguyen (2020). For k-median and k-means, we propose the first constant-factor approximation algorithms. Our algorithms transform a solution that satisfies diverse center selection into a doubly constrained fair clustering using an LP-based approach. Furthermore, our results are generalizable to other center-selection constraints, such as matroid k-clustering and knapsack constraints.

We study unlabeled MRMP for unit-disk robots in a polygonal environment. Although the problem is hard in general, polynomial-time solutions exist under appropriate separation assumptions on start and target positions. Banyassady et al.(SoCG'22) guarantee feasibility in simple polygons under start--start and target--target distances of at least $4$, and start--target distances of at least $3$, but without optimality guarantees. Solovey et al.(RSS'15) provide a near-optimal solution in general polygonal domains, under stricter conditions: start/target positions must have pairwise distance at least $4$, and at least $\sqrt{5}\approx2.236$ from obstacles. This raises the question of whether polynomial-time algorithms can be obtained in even more densely packed environments. In this paper we present a generalized algorithm that achieve different tradeoffs on the robots-separation $ρ$ and obstacles-separation $ω$, all significantly improving upon the state of the art. Specifically, we obtain polynomial-time constant-approximation algorithms to minimize the total path length when (i) $ρ=2\frac{2}{3}$ and $ω=1\frac{2}{3}$, or (ii) $ρ\approx3.291$ and $ω\approx1.354$. These solutions are weakly-monotone; we also provide a monotone solution requiring $ω=\approx1.614$ and $ρ=4$. We prove that monotone plans may not exist when $ω<1.614$, and weakly-monotone plans may not exist when $ω<1.354$. We then present tradeoffs between the separation bounds and the approximation factor, specifically achieving an (almost) optimal bound of $ρ=2$ at the cost of a linear approximation factor and requiring $ω=2$. This applies also for the labeled variant of MRMP, in which case we show a tight bound on $ω$. Finally, we show that without any robots-separation assumption, obstacles-separation of at least $1.5$ may be necessary for a solution to exist.

Robotic path planning problems are often NP-hard, and practical solutions typically rely on approximation algorithms with provable performance guarantees for general cases. While designing such algorithms is challenging, formally proving their approximation optimality is even more demanding, which requires domain-specific geometric insights and multi-step mathematical reasoning over complex operational constraints. Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet their ability to assist with research-level optimality proofs in robotic path planning remains under-explored. In this work, we introduce the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs on approximation-ratio proofs of robotic path planning algorithms. The benchmark consists of 34 research-grade proof tasks spanning diverse planning problem types and complexity levels, each requiring structured reasoning over algorithm descriptions, problem constraints, and theoretical guarantees. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source LLMs reveals that even the strongest models struggle to produce fully valid proofs without external domain knowledge. However, providing LLMs with task-specific in-context lemmas substantially improves reasoning quality, a factor that is more effective than generic chain-of-thought prompting or supplying the ground-truth approximation ratio as posterior knowledge. We further provide fine-grained error analysis to characterize common logical failures and hallucinations, and demonstrate how each error type can be mitigated through targeted context augmentation.

In a spiking neural network, is it enough for each neuron to spike at most once? In recent work, approximation bounds for spiking neural networks have been derived, quantifying how well they can fit target functions. However, these results are only valid for neurons that spike at most once, which is commonly thought to be a strong limitation. Here, we show that the opposite is true for a large class of spiking neuron models, including the commonly used leaky integrate-and-fire model with subtractive reset: for every approximation bound that is valid for a set of multi-spike neural networks, there is an equivalent set of single-spike neural networks with only linearly more (or less) neurons, in the maximum number of spikes, for which the bound holds. The same is true for the reverse direction too, showing that regarding their approximation capabilities in general machine learning tasks, single-spike and multi-spike neural networks are equivalent. Consequently, many approximation results in the literature for single-spike neural networks also hold for the multi-spike case.

We study neural networks with trainable low-degree rational activation functions and show that they are more expressive and parameter-efficient than modern piecewise-linear and smooth activations such as ELU, LeakyReLU, LogSigmoid, PReLU, ReLU, SELU, CELU, Sigmoid, SiLU, Mish, Softplus, Tanh, Softmin, Softmax, and LogSoftmax. For an error target of $\varepsilon>0$, we establish approximation-theoretic separations: Any network built from standard fixed activations can be uniformly approximated on compact domains by a rational-activation network with only $\mathrm{poly}(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ overhead in size, while the converse provably requires $Ω(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ parameters in the worst case. This exponential gap persists at the level of full networks and extends to gated activations and transformer-style nonlinearities. In practice, rational activations integrate seamlessly into standard architectures and training pipelines, allowing rationals to match or outperform fixed activations under identical architectures and optimizers.

Ball Mapper summarizes a finite metric dataset by covering the sample with closed balls centered at selected landmarks and connecting landmarks whose balls share observations. Its construction therefore depends critically on repeated fixed radius range queries, yet the effect of replacing exact queries by approximate search has not been systematically characterized. We formulate Ball Mapper through an abstract range query procedure that separates the mathematical construction from the search backend used to realize it. Under fixed ordering, exact procedures preserve the landmark sequence, cover, graph, and membership-based colorings. For approximate procedures, we derive deterministic bounds on covering radius and landmark separation under additive and multiplicative query errors, prove inclusions for the induced nerve, characterize edge survival through witness redundancy for conservative approximations, and bound perturbations of mean vertex colorings. The accompanying implementation provides independent exact reference backends together with exhaustive and approximate search methods under a common closed ball convention. Experiments on Gaussian, mixture, and noisy curve data across three seeds show that approximation fidelity depends strongly on geometry and that edges supported by multiple witnesses are substantially more robust to missed memberships. At 20,000 observations, the approximate indexes did not outperform exhaustive FAISS Flat search. The results therefore establish a framework for controlled approximation rather than a universal speed advantage, and identify the geometric and combinatorial quantities that govern when approximate range search preserves the Ball Mapper summary.

When solving optimization problems under uncertainty with contextual data, utilizing machine learning to predict the uncertain parameters' values is a popular and effective approach. Decision-focused learning (DFL) aims at learning a predictive model such that decision quality, instead of prediction accuracy, is maximized. Common practice is to predict a single scenario representing the uncertain parameters, implicitly assuming that there exists a deterministic problem approximation (proxy) that allows for optimal decision-making. The opposite has also been considered, where the underlying distribution is estimated with a parameterized distribution. However, little is known about when either choice is valid. This paper investigates for the first time problem properties that justify using a certain decision proxy. Using this, we present alternative decision proxies for DFL, with little or no compromise on the complexity of the learning task. We show the effectiveness of presented approaches in experiments on continuous and discrete problems, as well as problems with uncertainty in the objective function and in the constraints.

In this paper, we establish a novel connection between the metric entropy growth and the embeddability of function spaces into reproducing kernel Hilbert/Banach spaces. Metric entropy characterizes the information complexity of function spaces and has implications for their approximability and learnability. Classical results show that embedding a function space into a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) implies a bound on its metric entropy growth. Surprisingly, we prove a \textbf{converse}: a bound on the metric entropy growth of a function space allows its embedding to a $L_p-$type Reproducing Kernel Banach Space (RKBS). This shows that the ${L}_p-$type RKBS provides a broad modeling framework for learnable function classes with controlled metric entropies. Our results shed new light on the power and limitations of kernel methods for learning complex function spaces.

Clustering problems such as $k$-means and $k$-median are staples of unsupervised learning, and many algorithmic techniques have been developed to tackle their numerous aspects. In this paper, we focus on the class of greedy approximation algorithm, that attracted less attention than local-search or primal-dual counterparts. In particular, we study the recursive greedy algorithm developed by Mettu and Plaxton [SIAM J. Comp 2003]. We provide a simplification of the algorithm, allowing for faster implementation, in graph metrics or in Euclidean space, where our algorithm matches or improves the state-of-the-art.

In the classical best approximation pair (BAP) problem, one is given two nonempty, closed, convex and disjoint subsets in a finite- or an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, and the goal is to find a pair of points, each from each subset, which realizes the distance between the subsets. Motivated by our recent algorithm for solving the BAP problem [Censor, Mansour, Reem, J. Approx. Theory (2024)], we discuss the problem in more general normed spaces and with possibly non-convex subsets, and focus our attention on the fundamental issues of uniqueness and existence of the solution to the problem. We present several sufficient geometric conditions for the (at most) uniqueness of a BAP. These conditions are related to the structure and the relative orientation of the boundaries of the subsets and to the norm. We also present many sufficient conditions for the existence of a BAP. In general, the paper re-examines several aspects related to the BAP problem, including the historical one, and shows, probably for the first time, how wide is the scope of the BAP problem in terms of the scientific communities which are involved in it (frequently independently) and in terms of its applications.

Stochastic optimization is a widely used approach for optimization under uncertainty, where uncertain input parameters are modeled by random variables. Exact or approximation algorithms have been obtained for several fundamental problems in this area. However, a significant limitation of this approach is that it requires full knowledge of the underlying probability distributions. Can we still get good (approximation) algorithms if these distributions are unknown, and the algorithm needs to learn them through repeated interactions? In this paper, we resolve this question for a large class of ''monotone'' stochastic problems, by providing a generic online learning algorithm with $\sqrt{T\log(T)}$ regret relative to the best approximation algorithm (under known distributions). Importantly, our online algorithm works in a semi-bandit setting, where in each period, the algorithm only observes samples from the random variables that were actually probed. Moreover, our result extends to settings with censored and binary feedback, where the policy only observes truncated or thresholded versions of the probed variables. Our framework applies to several fundamental problems such as prophet inequality, Pandora's box, stochastic knapsack, single-resource revenue management and sequential posted pricing.

In recent years, there has been a surge in effort to formalize notions of fairness in machine learning. We focus on centroid clustering--one of the fundamental tasks in unsupervised machine learning. We propose a new axiom ``proportionally representative fairness'' (PRF) that is designed for clustering problems where the selection of centroids reflects the distribution of data points and how tightly they are clustered together. Our fairness concept is not satisfied by existing fair clustering algorithms. We design efficient algorithms to achieve PRF both for unconstrained and discrete clustering problems. Our algorithm for the unconstrained setting is also the first known polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the well-studied Proportional Fairness (PF) axiom. Our algorithm for the discrete setting also matches the best known approximation factor for PF.

In this article, we introduce a deep learning based approximation algorithm for SPDEs. Our approach employs neural networks to approximate the solutions of SPDEs along given realizations of the driving noise process. If applied to a set of simulated noise trajectories, it yields empirical distributions of SPDE solutions, from which functionals like the mean and variance can be estimated. We test the performance of the method on stochastic heat equations with additive and multiplicative noise as well as stochastic Black-Scholes equations with multiplicative noise and Zakai equations from nonlinear filtering theory. In all cases, the proposed algorithm yields accurate results with short runtimes in up to 100 space dimensions.