Relation-Conditioned Evidence Encoder

Likelihood-based context compression can account for cross-context redundancy through sequential scoring, but this makes compression outcomes sensitive to context order. We show that different permutations of the same context collection can produce markedly different evidence-retention outcomes under an unchanged compressor. We attribute this sensitivity to information preemption: earlier partially relevant contexts can absorb credit for shared information, suppressing the incremental score of later, stronger evidence carriers and increasing their risk of removal. Controlled pair-swap interventions directly support this mechanism by showing that evidence-first ordering substantially improves supporting-evidence survival. To address this problem, we introduce MORSE, a compression-aware method for evidence-preserving context ordering. MORSE applies a common reverse query-evidence principle to both individual contexts and compressed candidate outputs, using the former to construct an evidence-first anchor and the latter to guide compression-aware permutation selection. Across multi-hop QA benchmarks, compression procedures, budgets, and scoring models, MORSE consistently improves evidence preservation over static reverse ordering and compute-matched random search, with corresponding overall improvements in downstream QA. Our code is available at https://github.com/tbn5pj/MORSE_code.

Automated video interview assessment integrates verbal content, acoustic delivery, and visual behavior, yet numerical predictions alone provide limited inspectable support. We present E-AVI, an evidence-grounded framework that extracts timestamped multimodal evidence and integrates dimension-conditioned evidence attention with source-level embeddings for scoring. A shared evidence pool further supports natural-language feedback and follow-up question answering. On RecruitView and a private hospitality dataset, E-AVI consistently outperforms fine-tuned multimodal baselines in rank correlation. Ablation, evidence-deletion, bootstrap, human-audit, and QA analyses characterize the predictive contribution, grounding, and practical utility of the evidence pathway. Together, these results demonstrate that our proposed E-AVI framework improves predictive performance while providing inspectable support for assessment, feedback, and interactive analysis.

We propose SEAM, a LiDAR-based lifelong mapping framework. Instead of relying on a single anchor spanning the entire session, SEAM generates evidence based on a trajectory optimized with submap-level anchors, and performs dynamic object removal and change detection. Through submap-level reprojection, the generated evidence remains usable even if the trajectory is subsequently modified by a new session, eliminating the need to recompute the entire process from scratch. SEAM suppresses geometrically unreliable inter-session loop edges using a DOP-based confidence measure. Suppressing unreliable loop edges prevents alignment errors. SEAM also uses a directional voxel-wise evidence model. The model accounts for occupancy patterns that vary with ray direction. Direction-aware evidence separates dynamic objects from environmental changes more precisely. Experiments on a real construction-site dataset and a long-term multi-session dataset show that SEAM achieves higher accuracy and faster processing than existing methods.

Restricting what a module can read may improve what a system learns to compute. We test this in a preregistered confirmation with sixty four-cell systems sharing a frozen language-model backbone and communicating through learned continuous packets. Five conditions vary evidence masking, ownership markers, and replacement of foreign evidence with neutral filler (task-irrelevant text of the same token length), across six initialization clusters, each with two data orders, on one fresh task world. With markers available in both regimes, masking improved accuracy on held-out two- and three-operation compositions by median paired differences of 0.846 and 0.859; all twelve pairs cleared the required margins, and the full preregistered behavioral criterion passed. The unmarked replication also passed. No marked global-visibility (G+) system passed the marker-following check, so the effect of usable role information remains unresolved. The filler condition yielded seven full generalizers, but its decomposition criteria were inconclusive. Packet interventions in all eighteen audited masked systems followed the predicted intermediate-value changes on eligible cases; these finite, success-conditioned audits do not establish mediation. The results confirm a large advantage of the tested masking regime, while leaving its finer attribution and generality open. Protocols, results, and checkpoints are public.

Multimodal clinical decision-making requires reliable reasoning over heterogeneous evidence from electronic health records, medical images, and physiological signals. Existing models typically map these inputs directly to diagnoses without explicitly assessing evidence sufficiency, tool-use requirements, or diagnostic uncertainty. This paper presents MedTRACE, a tool-augmented multimodal clinical reasoning agent for evidence-grounded decision-making. MedTRACE uses modality-specific encoders to construct a unified patient-state representation and performs an iterative loop of hypothesis formation, toolaware deliberation, and evidence verification. It dynamically invokes visual grounding, evidence retrieval, and structured parsing tools to locate diagnosis-relevant regions, retrieve clinical knowledge and similar cases, and extract structured findings. The acquired evidence enters an evidence memory, where a consistency verifier confirms or revises the current hypothesis. MedTRACE outputs a diagnosis together with supporting evidence, an auditable reasoning trace, and calibrated confidence. Experiments on multiple multimodal clinical diagnosis benchmarks show that MedTRACE improves diagnostic accuracy by 5.4% and AUROC by 4.7 percentage points over the strongest baseline. It also improves evidenceselection F1 by 8.2 percentage points and visual-grounding IoU by 6.5 percentage points, reduces expected calibration error by 31.6%, and decreases unsupported diagnostic errors by 27.8%. These results demonstrate that active evidence acquisition and verification improve the accuracy, interpretability, and reliability of multimodal clinical decisionmaking.

Autonomous research agents are increasingly expected to search the literature, analyze experimental evidence, and generate scientific hypotheses. These capabilities require multi-step evidence grounded reasoning that progressively acquires, integrates, and verifies evidence before reaching a conclusion. Existing multimodal benchmarks, however, largely evaluate final-answer accuracy, leaving open whether predictions are actually supported by traceable scientific evidence. We introduce Sci-MMR, a benchmark for multi-step evidence-grounded scientific reasoning built on structured argument graphs linking scientific claims, citation-grounded knowledge, visual evidence, and supporting regions. Sci-MMR comprises 235 multi-hop reasoning tasks spanning four scientific disciplines, with an average of nine figure panels per task. Evaluating eight frontier multimodal models, we find that answer accuracy consistently exceeds complete-evidence recovery rate by more than 20%, revealing a substantial gap that answer-only evaluation is structurally unable to capture. Through controlled interventions, we identify two fundamental bottlenecks. First, evidence acquisition: models struggle to extract complete structured evidence from scientific figures, accounting for 57.2% of failures. While cropping tools yield modest gains (+4.5 points), providing gold evidence improves accuracy by up to 37.0 points, indicating difficulty in assembling complete multi-region evidence. Second, evidence integration: models struggle to translate available evidence into correct conclusions, accounting for 31.8% of failures, while even with gold evidence the strongest model achieves only 69.1% accuracy on the hardest tasks. These findings indicate that current answer-centric benchmarks substantially overestimate the evidence-grounded reasoning capabilities of multimodal research agents

Reviewer comments naturally relate to specific parts of the reviewed paper, yet grounding these comments to the underlying evidence is difficult due to long multimodal documents. Existing benchmarks do not capture this setting and largely focus on explicit, information-seeking queries. We introduce ReGround, a large-scale dataset for reviewer comment grounding that links 10,267 reviewer comments to 16,274 evidence in the original anonymous submission of 3,656 papers. We build on a simple observation: author rebuttals often include explicit references to content of the submission used to address reviewer comments, providing a high-precision annotation source. We cast grounding as a retrieval task and evaluate a wide range of retrieval methods. Results show that retrieval over the entire paper content performs poorly, evidence-type inference is a major bottleneck, and multimodal evidence provides complementary signals that text alone misses. Our dataset exposes grounding reviewer comments as a difficult and practically important problem for scientific document understanding.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as research agents, yet their ability to track shifts in research attention is difficult to evaluate because reviews and research ideas lack uniquely verifiable outcomes. We introduce Research Attention Prediction (RAP), a rolling benchmark covering 278 AI/ML fields and 1,390 episodes. At each cut-off, an LLM agent searches a temporally restricted arXiv corpus and predicts the next six months' paper shares across eight frozen research directions. Search generally helps, but all four diagnostic models perform worse than an exact-count exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) baseline in compositional accuracy. We identify two linked bottlenecks. Under cumulative-history access, State carry-forward outperforms direct Forecast for all four diagnostic models; frozen-evidence replay links a shared component of this reversal to Forecast-oriented policies retrieving a smaller share of recent evidence. Even with exact historical activity, future-specific updating remains limited, with only GPT-5.5 plus reopened Search slightly surpassing EWMA. Fine-tuning on realised outcomes improves Qwen3-4B's forecast Spearman correlation by 0.105 on held-out fields at later origins, with gains also on change-rich episodes.

Partially Relevant Video Retrieval (PRVR) retrieves untrimmed videos when queries describe only short moments. Although recent methods improve local representations, uncertainty modeling, and global context, final ranking often still trusts the strongest local response; a coincidentally similar fragment can therefore produce an unsupported peak. We identify this failure as the query-agnostic concentration bottleneck and propose TRACE, a score-level evidence verification operator for PRVR. Given a query and global video registers, TRACE activates query-relevant registers, routes their support to frame-level evidence, and smoothly marginalizes alternative query-to-register-to-frame paths before localized temporal selection. Unlike representation-level feature fusion, TRACE uses this evidence only as a query-conditioned residual calibration of the original local score. On ActivityNet Captions, Charades-STA, and TVR, TRACE achieves the best SumR on all three benchmarks and improves the DreamPRVR backbone by 1.2, 1.1, and 1.5 points, respectively. Ablation, routing-corruption, hard-negative, and cross-backbone transfer analyses support the interpretation that the gains arise from query-conditioned evidence verification rather than a generic score offset.

Medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly developed as separate mappings from radiographs to diagnostic outputs or from clinical descriptions to generated images, although both arise from the same underlying radiographic state. A world-model formulation instead seeks to learn an internal representation of this state that can support both clinical readout and conditional simulation of radiographic observations. Here we introduce MedDream, a radiographic world model that learns a shared continuous latent state from paired chest radiograph-text observations for diagnostic reasoning and report-conditioned evidence generation. MedDream was pretrained on 2.65 million leakage-controlled chest radiograph-text pairs curated from 4.40 million candidates. Across eight clinical datasets and two independent reader cohorts, MedDream outperformed leading diagnostic and generative comparators. For diagnostic reasoning, MedDream showed strong generalization across disease recognition, label-scarce adaptation, severity assessment, and localization, while MedDream-supported review increased mean resident concordance with independent radiologist consensus from 56.3% to 63.0%. For evidence generation, MedDream produced radiographs that preserved clinically relevant pathology and improved downstream performance on held-out real data, with synthetic augmentation increasing external VinDr-CXR macro-AUROC from 76.4% to 81.4%. More importantly, conditioning generation on prespecified subgroup performance gaps enabled targeted evidence construction, increasing weighted F1 by 3.1 percentage points in Asian patients, whereas matched-volume unguided augmentation decreased it by 2.3 points. These findings establish radiographic world models as a path toward medical AI that learns clinically meaningful internal states for interpreting, simulating, and constructing evidence for clinical use.

Personalized video recommendation predicts user preference at the video level, while temporal video grounding localizes query-relevant moments. However, strong localization does not establish whether the retrieved moment constitutes valid evidence for recommending the video to a particular user. We study counterfactual behavior-grounded evidence retrieval, which separates where personalized evidence occurs from whether such evidence exists and evaluates whether model predictions respond consistently when that evidence is replaced. We introduce CBGER-10K, containing 5,000 controlled factual--counterfactual pairs for 3,026 users, where each pair replaces only the focal behavior-supported segment while preserving the user, temporal position, and hard distractors. We further propose CBGER, a compact framework that decouples segment-level localization from video-level evidence estimation and learns both through structured counterfactual supervision. CBGER achieves $0.4432$ MRR, $0.6977$ Pair Accuracy, and $0.6987$ Intervention Consistency across five adapted personalized-highlight and temporal-grounding baselines. Notably, compared with QD-DETR, its MRR improvement is not statistically significant, while Pair Accuracy improves by $11.03$ points. These results show that accurate temporal localization does not necessarily imply reliable personalized evidence existence, motivating explicit evaluation of Whether alongside Where.

Computational mental health screening using multimodal speech and text has shown great promise. However, existing models often assume all clinical speech protocols carry equivalent evidentiary validity. In reality, heterogeneous protocols, from free interviews to fixed reading tasks, support fundamentally different evidence. Forcing uniform reasoning flattens these boundaries, causing models to hallucinate symptoms from irrelevant text or overclaim support. Even advanced long chain-of-thought LLMs fail to resolve this issue, as free-form reasoning can exacerbate boundary violations. To address this, we reformulate multimodal screening as an evidence-bounded reasoning problem. We introduce the Evidence Package Benchmark, integrating 1,870 packages across six heterogeneous sources with explicit modality masks and evidence permissions. We further propose EviBound, a protocol-aware evidence control framework. Unlike direct LLM prompting, EviBound uses a profile-aware planner to restrict reasoning scope, orchestrates evidence tools via five-way acoustic consensus, and enforces a boundary critic to suppress unsupported claims. Empirical results show EviBound achieves a held-out test Depression AUROC of 0.8658, exceeding the strongest direct omni-modal baseline by +0.0811 AUROC while maintaining zero claim violations. Our work moves beyond unconstrained accuracy toward evidence-consistent, protocol-aware systems for safer clinical NLP research.

Large multimodal models follow instructions about what to generate, but not necessarily about what evidence to rely on. Hence, models may continue to depend on shortcut-associated cues even when instructions suggest otherwise. We introduce GUIDE, a framework for controlling internal evidence usage through language instructions. GUIDE combines grouped parameter-efficient adaptation with instruction-conditioned gating to modulate multimodal evidence pathways during reasoning and generation. We further introduce a pathway-level evaluation framework that characterizes instruction-conditioned evidence modulation through reliance sensitivity, controlled perturbation analysis, pathway modulation, and autoregressive decoding dynamics. Across multimodal reasoning, classification, and generation, GUIDE induces structured and instruction-aligned redistribution of evidence reliance while largely preserving task behavior. Experiments on GQA, TextVQA, MM-IMDb, CREMA-D, RAVDESS, and Flickr30K show that GUIDE improves robustness under targeted evidence perturbations and enables controllable modulation across diverse multimodal settings. This suggests that multimodal instruction following can extend beyond output control toward regulating how different evidence sources contribute to model predictions.

Static importance scores compress visual evidence into a single ranking, but the value of remaining evidence can change after one cue has been observed. We study this possibility in controlled compositional visual search, where color, shape, and texture evidence can be independently exposed and their conditional marginal utility measured across acquisition states. In a held-out confirmation on 800 scenes, frozen OpenCLIP and SigLIP exhibit robust state-dependent rank reversals that concentrate in candidate-overlap regimes designed to induce ordering changes, persist across two evidence-accumulation constructions and ten equivalent query wordings, and collapse to near-chance-scale behavior under query-scene derangement. A subsequent role-balanced follow-up on 1,200 scenes rotates the abstract roles of initially strong, redundancy-inducing, and comparator attributes; the positive-minus-negative reversal contrast remains positive across all 24 role-permutation, backbone, and evidence-mode cells, although residual attribute-identity effects remain. We further distinguish measured replanning opportunity from prospective predictability. Matched-first-action utility analyses show substantial opportunity to rerank remaining evidence, but lightweight predictors using posterior-based or acquired-embedding state representations do not establish a robust incremental advantage of acquired-state information over legal static controls on the role-balanced benchmark. Together, these results show that conditional visual evidence utility is reliably state dependent in this controlled setting, while separating the existence of changing utility from the stronger claim that those changes are prospectively predictable by a learned selector.

Multi-hop retrieval must recover passages that provide sufficient evidence together. An initial passage often resolves an entity or relation implicit in the question, making the missing evidence easier to describe only after retrieval begins. Graph retrieval improves access to related evidence through stored corpus structure, but its retrieval signal is commonly derived from the original question. Complementary evidence must then be reached through stored relations even when an observed passage provides a more direct semantic cue. We introduce EviReform, which separates revising the retrieval request from aggregating evidence in the graph. Retrieved source passages formulate residual queries for the unresolved information need. The original and residual retrieval signals are normalized separately, combined, and propagated between propositions that share entities. On 2WikiMultiHopQA, HotpotQA, and MuSiQue, EviReform exceeds the strongest baseline by up to 5.59 Recall@5 points and 4.50 F1 points. These results show that observed evidence can guide graph retrieval toward the part of a supporting chain left underspecified by the original question. Code is available at https://github.com/XrazyMee/EviReform.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the factuality of large language models with external knowledge, yet conflicting evidence remains a fundamental challenge in dynamic and adversarial environments. Existing approaches often treat conflicts as static inconsistencies and select more reliable knowledge, overlooking that the same conflict may arise from legitimate knowledge evolution, malicious manipulation, or unresolved uncertainty. We formulate conflict origin attribution as a new problem in RAG: identifying which explanation of conflicting evidence is supported by observable context rather than simply which fact should be trusted. We propose EvoTrustRAG, a training-free framework for evolution-aware conflict attribution and evidence handling before answer generation. EvoTrustRAG represents span-grounded retrieved facts as a conflict evidence graph, evaluates grounded evolution and directional intervention hypotheses using temporal relations, support structure, and auxiliary consistency, and projects local decisions onto a globally consistent explanation of each conflict group. The attribution determines whether earlier and later states are preserved as temporal knowledge, an intervention candidate is separated from the primary context, or an unresolved conflict remains visible to the generator. Unlike provenance-based approaches focused on post-hoc analysis, EvoTrustRAG determines during inference whether conflicting evidence follows plausible knowledge evolution, exhibits intervention-like support, or cannot be reliably attributed. Experiments show that EvoTrustRAG achieves 81.4% average accuracy on benchmark-native conflict settings, improves attribution macro-F1 from 72.2% to 79.1% over the strongest baseline, and reduces the error rate under the strongest coordinated attack from 31.2% to 16.0%.

Visual retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) commonly expands the retrieved evidence set to improve answer-page coverage, implicitly assuming that all available evidence should be passed to the generator. We show that this assumption does not hold for diffusion language models (DLMs): retrieving more pages increases answer-page recall, whereas unconditionally passing all retrieved pages to the generator often reduces answer accuracy, primarily because of semantic conflict. A latent-source analysis explains this mismatch through source-coherence loss in parallel denoising, where position-wise proposals can combine incompatible visual sources into unsupported answers. We further find that such interference is already visible in the first-step answer-block distribution, making it possible to assess evidence before decoding. To preserve retrieval coverage while limiting harmful visual exposure, we propose the Entropy-Based Candidate Filter (ECF), a training-free evidence-admission framework. To reduce irrelevant content within individual candidates, ECF constructs multi-granularity evidence units; to identify beneficial additional evidence, it uses blank-controlled block confidence and retrieval rank to determine whether and which candidate should enter the final context. Across three multimodal DLMs and five visual QA benchmarks, ECF improves answer accuracy by 2.62 percentage points on average over the strongest fixed top-$k$ input and, with LLaDA2.0-Uni, by 2.37 percentage points on average over the best competing training-free result for each dataset. These results show that broader retrieval benefits visual DLM-RAG through selective evidence admission rather than unconditional evidence expansion. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/wjkuser/ECF.

Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems can fail before evidence-conditioned reasoning is tested: an agent may retrieve candidate snippets but finalize without inspecting them. We study this failure mode as a procedural property of the agent trajectory, decomposing wrong answers into pre-evidence discipline failures and post-gold-read failures using saved tool-call traces, retrieved evidence, read passages, and final answers. Across 12,000 paired trajectories on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue, the two failure types are largely non-redundant: the both-trigger rate is in [11.2%, 13.1%] across regex and spaCy entity extractors. We then evaluate Read-Gate, a minimal runtime invariant requiring an agent to read after search and before finalization. Forced reading improves LLM-Acc by 14.9-19.9 points on trajectories that would otherwise skip reading and by 3.2-9.4 points on full minimal-reasoning cells. Additional diagnostics show that larger hidden thinking budgets do not necessarily increase evidence inspection. Together, these results indicate that evidence-gathering should be evaluated as a trajectory-level control problem, separately from answer-side reasoning.

Diffusion vision-language models (dVLMs) iteratively denoise masked responses while conditioning each denoising step on visual evidence, making visual conditioning a substantial recurring inference cost. Unlike autoregressive decoding, diffusion generation repeatedly revisits the entire response as uncertainty evolves. Our analysis reveals that visual evidence demand is strongly step-dependent, motivating adaptive allocation across denoising steps. Existing inference acceleration methods operate through decoding-side strategies or visual token compression via pruning and merging, but do not explicitly treat visual evidence as a resource whose demand evolves across the diffusion process. Therefore, we present Denoising-Aware Visual Evidence Trajectory Allocation (DAVET), a training-free framework that allocates visual evidence according to the evolving generation state. Starting from a phase-conditioned evidence trajectory, the proposed allocation policy uses operation demand to set an evidence reserve whose allocation at each denoising step is modulated by trajectory risk. DAVET realizes the resulting budgets through a hierarchy of evidence views constructed from a single visual encoding, separating when and how much evidence is needed from how the evidence views are constructed. Evaluated on two representative dVLMs, LLaDA-V and LaViDa, across multiple visual-understanding benchmarks, DAVET achieves an average speedup of 1.55$\times$ with an average relative performance drop of 1.86%, showing that denoising-aware visual evidence allocation can reduce visual conditioning cost while largely preserving generation quality.

Whole slide image (WSI) classification is an evidence-driven task, where diagnostic cues are often sparse, spatially organized, and class-dependent. Existing MIL and vision-language methods aggregate a large pool of patch features into a single global slide representation. Under few-shot supervision, limited slide-level labels make it difficult to learn a reliable aggregation mechanism that organizes sparse local cues into compact and coherent diagnostic evidence. Moreover, a shared slide representation compresses evidence supporting a candidate class and its alternatives into the same feature, limiting class-specific reasoning and interpretability. To address these issues, we propose EviBall, a class-conditioned evidence retrieval framework for few-shot WSI classification. EviBall organizes local patches into Evidence Balls through semantic-spatial assignment and center refinement, yielding compact and spatially coherent evidence units under weak supervision. It then uses task-specific class queries, including language-guided queries for morphology-oriented tasks and molecular-guided queries for molecular endpoint prediction, to retrieve supporting evidence balls and produce class-conditioned evidence representations for direct class-wise prediction. By introducing structured evidence units and task-relevant semantic guidance, EviBall reduces the reliance on learning an unconstrained global aggregation mechanism from scarce slide-level labels. It therefore reformulates few-shot WSI classification as structured evidence retrieval and competition among candidate classes. Extensive experiments across four morphology-oriented and molecular endpoint WSI tasks demonstrate that EviBall consistently outperforms conventional and vision-language MIL baselines under diverse few-shot settings, while providing spatially localized and class-specific evidence for each prediction.

BoN improves model outputs by sampling several candidates and selecting one with a proxy score, but it assumes that complete candidates can be evaluated reliably. Many vision-language tasks instead provide only partial verification: a finding, span, value, region, or relation may be checkable even when no dependable whole-response verifier exists. Moreover, the same claim may recur across candidates with opposing stances, allowing one observation to support part of the pool and contradict another. We introduce Best-of-Evidence (BoE), an inference-time selection framework that keeps the BoN candidate pool fixed, represents reusable claims with a signed candidate--factor graph, and allocates a limited budget to evidence actions that can change the final choice. BoE formalizes selection under partial verification and provides a practical score-based controller, with the zero-budget case recovering the underlying BoN decision. Theoretically, we show that residual evidence capacity limits any evidence-driven improvement and that shared factor queries can achieve an O(log K) versus Θ(K) query separation in a factor-code model. Common-ledger experiments on four medical VQA settings show that BoE can improve fixed-pool selection and rescue some BoN failures when evidence is reliable, contrastive, and decision-relevant, while also revealing the channel-quality and candidate-generation limits that prevent universal gains.

Multi-hop retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) acquires evidence sequentially, with each new document potentially revealing missing facts, bridge entities, query defects, or sufficient support for answering. Existing methods provide useful operations such as iterative retrieval, query reformulation, evidence critique, and sufficiency judging, but typically organize them within method-specific pipelines or predefined control topologies. This leaves underexplored how to learn a shared state-conditioned policy that chooses among currently valid evidence operations. We introduce DynaKRAG, which formulates multi-hop evidence acquisition as state-conditioned control over atomic evidence operations. At each step, a validity layer constructs the executable action set, and a learned controller selects the next operation. The resulting transition updates the evidence state and may enable new operations at subsequent steps. With Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, DynaKRAG achieves F1 scores of 0.5998 on HotpotQA, 0.5340 on 2Wiki, and 0.3061 on MuSiQue, outperforming the strongest controlled baseline on all three benchmarks. Replacing the learned controller with a uniform-valid policy reduces F1 by 3.96--5.78 points, while removing sufficiency feedback hurts all three datasets. Controlled retrieval-cap experiments further show that additional retrieval is not uniformly beneficial. Together, these results demonstrate the benefit of coordinating retrieval, diagnosis, and gap-directed acquisition under an evolving evidence state.

Long-context reasoning requires models to locate, revise, and synthesize evidence distributed across lengthy inputs. Existing long-context RL methods usually reward final answers or static evidence extraction, offering little feedback on how intermediate actions change the model's evidence state. We propose Maven, a reinforcement learning framework with an editable evidence memory. Maven defines an answer-conditioned evidence-state value and rewards action-level state transitions: add actions are credited by marginal gain and hindsight contribution, link actions by evidence synergy, and drop actions by improved answer support after removing misleading evidence. These rewards are assigned to the corresponding action spans in GRPO. Across Llama and Qwen models on LongBench v2, LongReason, and RULER, Maven outperforms outcome-only RL and evidence-identification baselines, producing more sufficient evidence sets and lower distractor retention. Our results show that long-context RL benefits from optimizing stateful evidence navigation rather than one-shot evidence extraction.

Scientific discovery increasingly relies on automated systems that generate hypotheses, inspect multimodal evidence, and validate claims at scale. Yet scientific claim verification is not well served by asking a vision-language model for a direct binary judgment: claims often combine numerical results, comparisons, scope qualifiers, and explanatory context, while evidence is encoded in tables and figures with distinct grounding structures. We present SciLens, an evidence-conditioned atomic entailment framework for multimodal scientific claim verification. SciLens decomposes each claim into central empirical atoms and background atoms, grounds the central atoms to modality-specific evidence witnesses, and predicts the final label with an atom-level entailment rule. For tables, atoms are grounded to rows, columns, cells, arithmetic relations, and table scope; for figures, they are grounded through panels, axes, legends, visual encodings, categories, trends, ranks, and qualifier checks. This yields a unified validation procedure in which a claim is supported only if every central empirical atom is entailed by the current evidence. On the SciClaimEval development set, SciLens achieves 79.2% macro-F1 and 63.1% pair accuracy, showing that structured agentic validation improves both evidence sensitivity and interpretability.

Streaming video understanding models must answer queries at any moment during an ongoing stream, using only what they have observed so far and under fixed memory and computation budgets. Existing methods address this by adding memory banks, retrieval modules, or visual token compression to preserve long-range history. However, strong recent-window baselines show that indiscriminate history injection can dilute current-scene perception, suggesting that the key challenge is not whether to use memory, but how to allocate it selectively. We formulate this as budgeted online latent evidence allocation and propose \textbf{SelectStream}, a selective latent-memory framework that keeps the current observation directly visible to a frozen VLM while exposing historical information only through a compact, query-conditioned evidence budget. Three coordinated mechanisms govern when to write, what to preserve, and how to retrieve: surprise-driven adaptive windowing, priority-preserving consolidation, and query-conditioned graph reasoning over a fixed-capacity latent memory graph. Retrieved evidence is calibrated and injected as latent tokens for answer generation, without replaying frames or growing the context with stream length. Experimental results show that SelectStream achieves strong online streaming performance and preserves general video understanding, reaching 82.67% on StreamingBench, 67.03% on OVO-Bench, and 74.4% average accuracy on offline video benchmarks, while outperforming strong recent-window baselines and prior streaming memory methods.

Final-answer accuracy, retrieval recall, and citation overlap do not reveal how much answer advantage a long-context or retrieval-augmented language model actually recovers from supplied evidence. A model may answer from parametric priors, fail to use evidence that is present, or cite relevant text without converting it into the final answer. This paper introduces a four-condition diagnostic protocol for evidence-utilization evaluation under matched examples, models, prompts, and scoring rules. The protocol compares no-evidence, full-context, retrieved-evidence, and oracle-evidence reference conditions, and uses Oracle-Reference Normalized Context Utilization (ONCU) as a denominator-valid estimate of recovered oracle-reference evidence advantage. The empirical study evaluates five local open-weight models from the Qwen, Gemma, Llama, and Mistral families over Controlled-ONCU-safe16K, HotpotQA-ONCU, and 2WikiMultiHopQA-ONCU, comprising 18,000 ONCU-compatible predictions. Results show a task-dependent diagnostic pattern: controlled synthetic settings expose reduced recovery when the same evidence is embedded in long input rather than supplied compactly, while realistic multi-hop reconstructions show that full-context inputs outperform the tested retrieved inputs in denominator-free answer and evidence metrics, with ONCU supporting the same direction on oracle-improving groups. Sensitivity audits with stronger retrieval settings narrow some gaps but do not overturn the scoped interpretation. The main contribution is therefore not a single utilization ratio, but a matched diagnostic protocol that separates no-evidence answerability, oracle-evidence recoverability, full-context recovery, retrieval-conditioned recovery, denominator validity, and companion answer/evidence diagnostics.

This paper presents an agentic multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for domain-specific literature reasoning, instantiated on a curated corpus of several thousand papers in intelligent tires, vehicle dynamics, vehicle control, sensing, estimation, and machine learning. Unlike conventional single-pass RAG systems, the proposed architecture uses an autonomous, evidence-gated pipeline that classifies query intent, generates separate text and visual query rewrites, performs hybrid text retrieval with FAISS and BM25 followed by cross-encoder reranking, expands evidence through graph-guided chunk traversal over a Neo4j knowledge graph, and retrieves visual document evidence using ColSmol late-interaction embeddings with MUVERA fixed-dimensional encoding, approximate nearest-neighbor search, and MaxSim reranking. The framework scores evidence sufficiency using a 100-point rubric with hybrid rule-based/LLM review, retries retrieval through drift-guarded reformulation, searches external academic databases through optimize--search--vet loops, merges and deduplicates multimodal evidence, verifies citation integrity, and generates cited answers through Planner, Researcher, Writer, and Critic agents with self-correcting revision. Key contributions include: (i) a scalable multimodal retrieval architecture combining text, graph, and visual evidence over 40,000 document pages; (ii) an interpretable evidence sufficiency and retry mechanism; (iii) a multi-agent generation pipeline with evidence mapping and critic-driven revision; (iv) a domain knowledge graph with LLM-based entity extraction, OpenAlex author validation, and intra-corpus citation resolution; and (v) a route-dependent external search architecture for targeted literature expansion. The result is a practical, evidence-gated, multimodal agentic RAG architecture for technical reasoning over specialized research corpora.

Ensuring factuality and interpretability in RAG remains an open and urgent problem. We introduce Contrastive Evidence Rationale Attention (CERA), the first retrieval framework to employ subjectivity-based hard negative selection and inject an evidential inductive bias into contrastive learning through an auxiliary attention alignment loss. CERA fine-tunes a dense retriever using two training objectives: triplet-based contrastive learning and interpretable attention alignment, which supervises CLS-to-token attention using a part-of-speech-weighted masking distribution over human-annotated factual rationales as evidence signals. Experiments on a large corpus of clinical trial reports demonstrate that the subjectivity-based hard negative selection substantially improves retrieval effectiveness compared to both Contriever and hard negative selection baselines. Furthermore, rationale alignment improves faithfulness while maintaining competitive retrieval performance, supporting the hypothesis that attention can serve as a more faithful explanation of model behavior when guided by human rationales. Moving beyond topical similarity, CERA enables the retriever to identify the specific tokens that constitute supporting evidence, promoting more interpretable evidence selection in RAG systems.

In the field of multimodal fact checking, the accuracy of retrieving evidence from different modalities has a significant impact on the downstream claim verification process. Existing general multimodal retrieval methods are often constructed based on semantics, resulting in the retrieved evidence being similar but not relevant to the claim. This paper proposes a \textbf{D}ynamic \textbf{A}daptive \textbf{C}ontrastive \textbf{L}earning method for evidence \textbf{R}etrieval called DACLR to address these issues. DACLR first uses a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to uniformly convert multimodal evidence and claims into text modalities, and extracts the features of these information at event level. Then, it conducts evidence retrieval through a two-stage retrieval method of recall-rerank. DACLR enhances the model's event perception ability of the retrieval stage by optimizing the contrastive loss and mining hard negative samples. Specifically, DACLR designs three loss functions at two levels (semantic and event) based on the InfoNCE loss.Corresponding to these, three sets of hard negative sample candidates are set up. The model dynamically adjusts the ratio based on the accuracy supervision signal of intra-batch samples, allowing the model to learn the correlation between claims and positive samples at the event level without forgetting the semantic retrieval ability. Extensive comparison and ablation experiments demonstrates the effectiveness of DACLR and its internal optimization methods. Further research also prove the advantages of DACLR in the field of multimodal evidence retrieval.

Ranking systems used in decision-support settings should not only order candidates but also expose evidence that can be independently checked. We study evidence-certified candidate ranking: given an intent_id, a predefined plan skeleton, a window-local candidate roster, and text-derived candidate trajectories with span provenance, a system must output a Top-K list together with doc_id:span evidence certificates whose cited spans are sufficient to recover the decision. We instantiate this task on MAVEN-ERE and RAMS with fixed upstream extraction, window-local randomized candidate identifiers, skeleton-aligned trajectory supervision, hard negatives, and audit references. We introduce Evidence-Coupled Policy Optimization (ECPO), a listwise policy-optimization objective whose action is the joint object of ranking and evidence certificate. ECPO first learns an interpretable trajectory reward from skeleton alignment, argument consistency, and optional graph features; it then optimizes a constrained policy with three coupled rewards: listwise ranking utility, span-level certificate validity, and an evidence-cycle reward computed by a label-free deterministic verifier that reconstructs candidate support from claim-stripped cited spans. This reframes the goal from maximizing ordinary NDCG alone to maximizing CertNDCG and decision-evidence coupling. The evaluation compares ECPO against zero-shot, SFT, and GRPO policies, RM-only scoring with deterministic evidence attachment, grammar/JSON-constrained decoding, validator retry, best-of-N RM selection, and post-hoc evidence rationalization under closed-roster, predicted-roster, and hybrid-roster settings.

Open-set recognition systems face a neglected failure mode: high-confidence near-known unknowns, which lie outside the known label set but are close enough to known classes that a closed-set classifier accepts them with high confidence. We show that this failure is widespread across scalar-threshold methods, including recent post-hoc detectors, and that stronger encoders can amplify rather than remove the risk. We propose EGUR-A, which changes the decision from is this sample's score high enough?'' to does this predicted known class have sufficient evidence to accept this sample?'' EGUR-A combines class-conditional local acceptance evidence with global residual evidence, and selects their relative weight from known-sample statistics without unknown validation data. Across CUB, FGVC-Aircraft, and ImageNet-hard, EGUR-A substantially reduces high-confidence false known acceptance at matched known-rejection operating points. The result is not a stronger threshold; it is a different question: whether a known class is entitled to accept a sample.

Vision-language models improve perception by feeding increasingly long visual token sequences into language backbones, but the resulting inference cost raises a basic scaling question: as multimodal models grow, how many visual tokens are actually needed, and how should they be allocated under a fixed visual token budget? Existing training-free pruning methods typically answer this with one-shot proxies such as decoder attention, visual similarity, or conditional diversity. We argue that visual token pruning is better viewed as task-conditioned evidence search, especially under aggressive compression and across model scales. We propose F^3A, a training-free router for visual token pruning that operates before the language model consumes image tokens. F^3A builds lightweight question-conditioned cues, matches them to visual-grid tokens through frozen sparse sensing heads, and allocates a fixed vision token budget via coarse evidence localization, local refinement, coverage-preserving competition, and recovery of under-covered regions. It requires no model training, no extra LLM forward pass and preserves the original multimodal prompting and decoding pipeline.

Open-vocabulary scene graph generation (SGG) aims to describe visual scenes with flexible and fine-grained relation phrases beyond a fixed predicate vocabulary. While recent vision-language models greatly expand the semantic coverage of SGG, they also introduce a critical reliability issue: predicted relations may be driven by language priors or object co-occurrence rather than grounded visual evidence. In this paper, we propose an evidence-rounded open-vocabulary SGG framework based on counterfactual relation verification. Instead of directly accepting plausible relation proposals, our method verifies whether each candidate relation is supported by relation-pecific visual, geometric, and contextual evidence. Specifically, we first generate open-vocabulary relation candidates with a vision-language proposer, then decompose predicate phrases into soft evidence bases such as support, contact, containment, depth and state. A relation-conditioned evidence encoder extracts predicate-relevant cues, while a counterfactual verifier tests whether the relation score decreases when necessary vidence is removed and remains stable under irrelevant perturbations. We further introduce contradiction-aware predicate learning and graph-level preference optimization to improve fine-grained discrimination and global graph consistency. Experiments on conventional, open-vocabulary, and panoptic SGG benchmarks show that our method consistently improves standard recall-based metrics, unseen predicate generalization, and counterfactual grounding quality. These results demonstrate that moving from relation generation to relation verification leads to more reliable, interpretable, and evidence-grounded scene graphs.

Neurobiological and neurodegenerative diseases are inherently multifactorial, arising from coupled influences spanning genetic susceptibility, brain alterations, and environmental and behavioral factors. Multimodal modeling has therefore been increasingly adopted for disease diagnosis by integrating complementary evidence across data sources. However, in both large-scale cohorts and real-world clinical workflows, modality coverage is often incomplete, making many multimodal models brittle when one or more modalities are unavailable. Existing approaches to incomplete multimodal diagnosis typically rely on group-wise or static priors, which may fail to capture subject-specific cross-modal dependencies; moreover, many models provide limited interpretability into which evidence sources drive the final decision. To address these limitations, we propose Conditional Evidence Reconstruction and Decomposition (CERD), a framework for interpretable multimodal diagnosis with incomplete modalities. CERD first reconstructs missing modality representations conditioned on each subject's observed inputs, then decomposes diagnostic evidence into shared cross-modal corroboration and modality-specific cues via logit-level attribution. Experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) demonstrate that CERD outperforms competitive baselines under incomplete-modality settings while producing structured and clinically aligned evidence attributions for trustworthy decision support.