Libero Manipulation Benchmark

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have achieved high task success rates on robot manipulation task benchmarks. More recently, there has been an emphasis on evaluating the robustness of VLA models to perturbations. However, this robustness is still predominantly measured through Task Success Rate (TSR). In this work, we propose a benchmark-agnostic evaluation framework to measure the behavioural robustness of models by characterising how successful trajectories are executed under perturbation. We implement this methodology by extending the widely-used LIBERO and LIBERO-Plus benchmarks. Across three state-of-the-art VLA models, four LIBERO task suites and seven perturbation conditions, we evaluate changes in both typical successful behaviour and its variability, including metrics of motion smoothness, efficiency and gripper behaviour. We find that perturbations can alter the behaviour of successful trajectories, a phenomenon which cannot necessarily be inferred from TSR alone. Across LIBERO suites, we identify cases where state-of-the-art VLA models achieve comparable TSR under the same perturbation condition, yet behaviour on successful trajectories diverges substantially. Therefore, to have a more robust assessment of task performance, we argue that suitable measures of robustness should capture not only whether a task is completed, but also how the robot behaves while completing it. When evaluating the robustness of VLA models, TSR may be complemented by behavioural evaluation metrics that characterise the nature and variability of successful task execution by robots.

General-purpose agents can plan, use tools, and revise their behavior from feedback, but it remains unclear whether these capabilities transfer from digital environments to embodied manipulation. To investigate this question, we introduce LIBERO-Agent, an agent-native benchmark for evaluating these agents in robot manipulation tasks. Rather than asking agents to submit task-level Python control programs or operate through high-level robot skills, LIBERO-Agent provides an interactive robotic environment where agents can select which observations to inspect, process them with their own tools, and issue native action commands. LIBERO-Agent integrates 200 tasks into a common interaction framework and provides a 30-task primary suite that separates perception, short-horizon execution, and long-horizon composition. Results reveal a pronounced reliability gap: while agents perform well on perception and easy short-horizon tasks, their performance degrades substantially on hard short-horizon and long-horizon tasks. Richer observations improve short-horizon manipulation, while demonstration benefits depend on the agent and format. Among these agents, GPT-6 Astra achieves the strongest overall performance. Further analysis shows its major advantage lies in mechanism interaction, especially when sustained physical contact is needed, while its remaining failures stem from cross-stage interference and geometric errors.

Robots must often continue a task after a target moves, the viewpoint shifts, or an obstacle appears, even though their earlier observations and committed actions reflect the previous scene. Many simulation robustness benchmarks fix external conditions at reset, leaving this temporal challenge underexamined. We introduce LIBERO-MAX, a benchmark of 8,000 paired cases spanning eight types of changes to geometry, observations, appearance, clutter, and paths. Each pair compares task execution with and without a mid-task event, holding the task, initial state, policy seed, and pre-event action sequence fixed. This controlled comparison distinguishes event-associated regressions from failures already present without the change. Across fourteen current VLA, hybrid, and world-action policies, events reduce success by 11.0-25.7 percentage points. Event profiles reveal shared vulnerabilities to geometry and observation changes, while policy-family rankings interleave. Camera controls show that robustness reflects both competence under the changed conditions and the trajectory from which they are encountered; varying query cadence does not eliminate the gap. Together, the paired protocol and temporal diagnostics establish LIBERO-MAX as a reproducible testbed for diagnosing failures under mid-execution changes and measuring progress toward robot policies that remain effective as the world changes.

Robotic foundation models achieve impressive performance on standard manipulation benchmarks, yet these evaluations typically assume clean, timely, and consistent visual observations throughout execution. We introduce LIBERO-VPro, a benchmark for systematically evaluating the closed-loop visual robustness of robotic foundation models by perturbing the visual evidence available during execution. LIBERO-VPro covers four complementary dimensions, including Visual Evidence Degradation, Camera Staleness, Visual Source Consistency, and Task-Relevant Scene Variation, spanning 12 challenge categories, 96 experimental settings, and 3,296 task-condition cases. We evaluate three vision-language-action models and three world-action models over approximately 196,000 simulated episodes, complemented by 200 real-world rollouts on a Franka Research 3. Our results reveal that strong nominal performance can mask substantial weaknesses in visual grounding and adaptation. Models often remain successful despite severe object-level occlusion, yet degrade sharply when local interaction cues are disrupted or familiar spatial priors are violated. They are also highly sensitive to stale or missing observations and struggle when changed task preconditions require behavioral adaptation. Finally, VLAs and WAMs exhibit distinct robustness profiles, showing that visual robustness is multi-dimensional and architecture-dependent. LIBERO-VPro provides a systematic diagnostic framework for developing robotic foundation models that can more reliably ground and adapt their actions under challenging visual conditions.

Adapting a pretrained Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model to a new robot, environment, or task requires demonstrations that are collected locally and often discarded. Federated learning is a promising approach to exploiting such distributed demonstrations by learning a shared policy. However, whether it can adapt large pretrained VLAs remains an open question, and a lack of reproducible benchmarks for pretrained VLAs and reusable training frameworks makes existing results difficult to compare. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of federated fine-tuning of three modern pretrained VLA policies on the 40 simulated tasks of the LIBERO manipulation benchmark, and on six real-world tasks in two real-robot experiments, with demonstrations collected across two and three sites, respectively. Our study analyzes the key choices in this setting, spanning multiple federated parameter scopes, three aggregation algorithms, and evaluation under distribution shift. Based on the study, we derive a series of lessons, including the dominance of the federated scope over the choice of aggregation algorithm and the difficulty of matching centralized fine-tuning on physical robots, where cross-site heterogeneity is stronger than simulation captures. We also highlight opportunities for federated VLA learning, such as the ability to match centralized fine-tuning on heterogeneous data, to remain at least as robust as centralized fine-tuning under distribution shift, and to personalize, with each client federating part of the policy and keeping the rest local, which helps where the policy's pretraining is weak but leaves no usable global model. We open-source \decentvla{}, the model- and runtime-agnostic testbed behind the study, to facilitate future research and fair comparisons in federated VLA learning.

Vision-language-action (VLA) deployment can reduce inference latency while changing closed-loop task behavior. We evaluate HuggingFaceVLA/smolvla_libero on an RTX 2060 (6 GB) in LIBERO Spatial and Object (MuJoCo 3.3.2, LeRobot 0.6.1, seed 42), comparing PyTorch+AMP with ONNX Runtime CUDA Execution Provider (CUDA EP). The main evaluation uses 100 episodes/suite; a paired rollout uses 300 episodes/suite. PyTorch+AMP reaches 70.0%/88.0% Spatial/Object success at 1181 ms p99. Requested-FP16 and requested-INT8 ONNX reduce tether-inspect p99 to 601 ms and 532 ms, while Spatial success falls to 41.0% and 40.0% and Object remains at 89.0%. A graph audit shows those artifacts are byte-identical FP32 graphs, so the requested-INT8 row is not operator-level INT8 quantization. A static language-width ablation (16/24/32 tokens) yields Spatial success of 41.0%, 75.0%, and 71.0%; widths 24 and 32 recover much of the Spatial drop while Object success and uniform-bench latency stay approximately stable. Width-24 ONNX Spatial success is comparable to the PyTorch+AMP baseline at roughly half the latency (Wilson intervals overlap; two-proportion chi-squared p=0.53). Context width is an important contributor in this stack; it does not account for every PyTorch-vs-ONNX difference. Deployment evaluation should jointly report latency, artifact inspection, interface constraints, and closed-loop success. Code: https://github.com/rafiqul713/smolvla-libero-onnx.

We study how physical-state inputs affect a 0.8B hybrid language model adapted for manipulation with 6.2M trainable parameters. Six conditions are trained on three LIBERO-Spatial tasks and evaluated over three seeds and 540 held-out rollouts. Conditioning recurrent decay gates on geometric increments yields 28.9% success, compared with 36.7% when those increments are shuffled during training and 24.4% without explicit object/goal geometry. Both geometry policies receive correct inputs at evaluation. A token adapter using the same increments scores 27.8%; differences vary across seeds and remain inconclusive. Token-clock conditioning scores 11.1%, including one seed that fails to converge. In separate robustness tests, a state-only relative-coordinate policy retains 7/10 success under frame relabeling, whereas all four tested visual policies fall to at most 3/20 after a 5 cm object displacement. These results show no reliable advantage from training-time geometric alignment under this recipe and illustrate the gap between coordinate invariance and physical-layout generalization. Episode records, seed-level analyses, and figure-generation code accompany the paper.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) or World Action (WAM) models have recently demonstrated remarkable performance in robotic manipulation. On LIBERO, SOTA method have achieved nearly 100% success rates, seemingly suggesting that the models are ready for deployment in real world. However, near perfect performance on existing benchmarks can be misleading: success under ideal conditions does not imply real world robustness. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate task completion from predefined initial states, while real world interactions inevitably involve failures such as failed grasps, collisions, and unintended object movements. A robot must therefore not only execute tasks successfully, but also recognize and recover from failures to continue the task. Yet this capability remains largely unmeasured, revealing a critical gap between benchmark performance and real world reliability. To address this gap, we introduce LIBERO-Recover Benchmark, a large scale benchmark for failure recovery in robotic manipulation. Built upon LIBERO, we collect real execution failures from SOTA embodied models and construct 1,000+ scenarios across four recovery levels: (1) Action Retry, (2) Action Adaptation, (3) Object State Recovery, and (4) Environmental Recovery. We evaluate four core capabilities: spatial understanding, object structure reasoning, interaction understanding, and topological reasoning. As the first large-scale benchmark for embodied failure recovery, LIBERO-Recover shifts evaluation from \emph{Can the robot succeed?''} to \emph{Can the robot recover after failure?''}, promoting robust and generalizable embodied agents. The project will be avaible in \textcolor{blue}{https://liulin815.github.io/LIBERO-Recovery/}.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models with billions of parameters now dominate the LIBERO manipulation benchmark, but the model capacity actually required by the benchmark remains unclear. We introduce MINERVA (MINimal Efficient Robotic Vision-Action policy), a family of deliberately compact visuomotor policies designed to measure this task-specific capacity floor. A 0.54M-parameter policy achieves 95.1% average success over 2,000 rollouts on the four standard LIBERO suites, only 2.4 points below the reported LeRobot $π_{0.5}$ result despite using 7,700$\times$ fewer parameters. Performance saturates near 1M parameters and collapses below 0.25M. Across broad architectural, training, and inference sweeps, only action-chunk length and vision capacity consistently exceed a $\pm$1-point training-seed band. Flow matching provides no detectable advantage over direct L1 regression across three seeds, while regression is up to 3.8$\times$ faster on GPU. A task-ID permutation probe shows that standard LIBERO instruction conditioning primarily selects among memorized tasks: changing only the task-ID mapping reduces success to near chance. The same recipe achieves 94.6% success across 89 LIBERO-90 tasks, while LIBERO-Plus perturbations reduce performance to 46--56%, with near-zero robustness to photometric shifts. The 0.54M policy replans every control step in 5--9 ms per chunk on a laptop CPU, 113$\times$ faster than SmolVLA and 1,400$\times$ faster than $π_{0.5}$, without a GPU. These results establish a first empirical estimate of LIBERO's task-specific capacity floor and motivate capacity-aware design and distillation for deployment-efficient robot policies.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models translate natural-language commands into robot action sequences, but leading systems on the LIBERO-Plus robustness benchmark use three- to seven-billion-parameter backbones whose memory demands can exceed embedded robotic budgets. We present CoTinyVLA, a 0.9B-parameter action model on a Qwen3.5-0.8B backbone that obtains that robustness by structuring supervision instead of enlarging the model. Three components target different axes of the problem: dual-view temporal input of 16 history frames per step with textual camera and time markers; hierarchical chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation from a 35B teacher into an episode-level Plan and a chunk-level Think span over task phase, gripper state and next subaction; and paraphrase augmentation expanding 40 base commands into 800 variants. On LIBERO-Plus, spanning 10,030 perturbed tasks across seven perturbation dimensions, CoTinyVLA reaches 90.8% on Spatial, 87.3% on Object, 86.6% on Goal and 80.7% on Long, leading the strongest 7B baseline on all four suites by 4.7, 2.8, 15.9 and 3.0 points, with every margin interval excluding zero. The gains concentrate on the hardest axes of the benchmark: across the eleven published baselines none exceeds 53.2% on Robot Initial States in any suite, whereas CoTinyVLA reaches 73.6% on Goal against 39.9% for the strongest baseline. Ablations show the three components to be separable by perturbation axis, and at a matched image budget how frames are divided between the two cameras and across time accounts for 8.6 points on its own. Closed-loop inference peaks at 2.25 GiB of allocated GPU memory, and paired interventions show the episode Plan to be load-bearing: replacing it with an empty or contradictory span costs 40 to 45 points of success. Structured supervision thus lets a 0.9B backbone exceed all of them. Code: https://github.com/BrainJellyPie/CoTinyVLA

Fine-tuning a vision-language-action model (VLA-JEPA) on a single GPU should be simple: load a pretrained checkpoint, run training, deploy. There is a hidden danger. Run the same fine-tuning code thirteen times -- same data, same architecture, different random seed -- and twelve runs produce a robot succeeding 91--94% of the time, while one run silently degrades to 65.2%: a 29 pp gap with no error message, no warning, and no way to predict which seed will fail. We call this the seed lottery. We trace the cause to output collapse: the action predictor quietly learns to produce nearly identical outputs regardless of what the robot sees. Existing weight-level methods (L2, EWC) are structurally blind to this collapse -- they penalize weight changes, but collapse occurs in directions weights can move freely without affecting outputs, a gap we formalize via the Jacobian null-space. Across 7 methods x up to 13 seeds x 3 LIBERO benchmarks, three output-level regularizers -- VICReg (n=12 seeds), Dropout (n=4), and a halved learning rate (n=5) -- each eliminate every catastrophic seed (0/21 combined collapses vs. 1/13 Baseline; F(12,11)=28.7, p<0.001), while weight-level methods (L2, EWC) preserve the lottery. The simplest fix is changing one number in your optimizer config.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance on standard manipulation benchmarks, but most evaluations assume that task-relevant objects are fully visible. This assumption often fails in realistic settings, where occlusion makes manipulation partially observable. In this paper, we study \textit{scene-induced occlusion} as a fundamental challenge for VLA models and introduce \textbf{LIBERO-Occ}, an occlusion-oriented extension of LIBERO. Experiments show that state-of-the-art VLAs suffer substantial performance degradation under occlusion. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{Viewpoint Imagination (VIM)}, which generates a complementary view from an occluded primary observation and conditions action prediction on both observed and imagined evidence. VIM improves robustness across task suites, occlusion types, and severity levels without requiring additional cameras at deployment time, suggesting that viewpoint imagination is an promising mechanism for perception completion in partially observable manipulation. Our benchmark and corresponding code are available at: \href{https://github.com/litsh/Libero-Occ}{https://github.com/litsh/Libero-Occ}.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have advanced rapidly across backbones, training recipes, and data scale, yet the action decoder, which converts the backbone's hidden state into a continuous control signal, has barely changed and remains a single-point predictor across the majority of current VLAs. Whether implemented via autoregressive token bins, L1 regression, or flow-matching denoising, the resulting decoder treats the action space as unstructured, leaving the geometric proximity of neighboring actions unexploited during training. To advance this, we introduce ActionMap, a voxel heatmap action head that drops into an existing VLA in place of its native action decoder. For each new action, the head predicts a voxel heatmap over the action space, where each voxel directly stores the probability of the corresponding action. Across LIBERO simulation and real-world Franka manipulation, our heatmap head surpasses two architecturally distinct backbones at matched training steps (e.g., +8.2% over OpenVLA-OFT's L1 regression head on the LIBERO four-suite average), converges at comparable or faster rates on both backbones, and remains markedly more data-efficient at low training data. The cross-backbone consistency indicates that action representation is a real lever for VLA performance, distinct from further backbone or recipe scaling. Project Page: https://showlab.github.io/ActionMap/.

Muon is a matrix-aware optimizer that leverages Newton-Schulz (NS) iterations to enforce spectral gradient orthogonalization by driving all singular values of the momentum matrix toward 1. While this uniform spectral whitening enhances exploration and outperforms AdamW in LLM pretraining, we show it could lead to fundamental limitations beyond pretraining in two regimes: (i) cross-modality vision-language-action (VLA) training, where inherently low-rank action-module gradients cause amplification of noisy tail directions, and (ii) reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), where low-SNR gradients and the need to preserve per-head specialization from prior training make whitening unstable. To address these challenges, we propose Pion, a drop-in replacement for Muon that preserves its computational efficiency while replacing uniform spectral whitening with a two-stage Promotion+Suppression mechanism, which we call the high-pass NS iteration. This design induces a sharp spectral high-pass effect, anchoring dominant singular values at 1 while suppressing noisy tail components toward 0, with controllable filter strength. To preserve pretrained per-head heterogeneity, Pion also supports a per-head mode that applies updates independently across attention heads via a simple reshape, at no extra cost. In VLA training on LIBERO and LIBERO-Plus, Pion consistently outperforms both baselines across l_1-regression (VLA-Adapter) and flow-matching (VLANeXt) architectures, e.g., reaching 100% success rate on LIBERO Object after 1,500 training steps with VLA-Adapter, vs. 97.0% for Muon and only 32.2% for AdamW. The advantage of Pion further extends to a real Franka Research 3 robot with a pi_0.5 backbone under the DROID setup on three grasp-and-place tasks. In RLVR post-training on Qwen3-1.7B/4B with GRPO and GMPO, Pion also outperforms AdamW on MATH and GSM8K while Muon collapses to zero.

Research on Vision Language Action (VLA) models has been increasing rapidly in recent years. Although some of them focus on detecting, preventing, and recovering from task failures, they usually don't deal with adapting to robot's physical failures. In real-life scenarios, most robots face physical degradations in various ways such as joint degradation, actuator failure, or weak gripper. We introduce malfunction-aware (health-conditioned) VLA that takes a health vector as an input that gives information about robots' joints' operation angle and torque capability, and adapts its predictions to complete the tasks with the degraded joints. To achieve this, we inject a Health Projector module to the VLA-Adapter architecture and train it on malfunction robot data we collected on the LIBERO environment [1]. We collect 128 teleoperated episodes on Libero-Spatial tasks. Our results show that, with a very lightweight addition, the model can learn to operate successfully with different configurations of degraded joints which the default pretrained VLA-Adapter's Libero-Spatial-Pro model cannot. The code and dataset will be available soon at https://github.com/h-arslan/health-aware-vla

Existing robotic foundation models, while powerful, are predicated on an implicit assumption of temporal homogeneity: treating all actions as equally informative during optimization. This "flat" training paradigm, inherited from language modeling, remains indifferent to the underlying physical hierarchy of manipulation. In reality, robot trajectories are fundamentally heterogeneous, where low-velocity segments often dictate task success through precision-demanding interactions, while high-velocity motions serve as error-tolerant transitions. Such a misalignment between uniform loss weighting and physical criticality fundamentally limits the performance of current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models and World-Action Models (WAM) in complex, long-horizon tasks. To rectify this, we introduce AttenA+, an architecture-agnostic framework that prioritizes kinematically critical segments via velocity-driven action attention. By reweighting the training objective based on the inverse velocity field, AttenA+ naturally aligns the model's learning capacity with the physical demands of manipulation. As a plug-and-play enhancement, AttenA+ can be integrated into existing backbones without structural modifications or additional parameters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AttenA+ significantly elevates the ceilings of current state-of-the-art models. Specifically, it improves OpenVLA-OFT to 98.6% (+1.5%) on the Libero benchmark and pushes FastWAM to 92.4% (+0.6%) on RoboTwin 2.0. Real-world validation on a Franka manipulator further showcases its robustness and cross-task generalization. Our work suggests that mining the intrinsic structural priors of action sequences offers a highly efficient, physics-aware complement to standard scaling laws, paving a new path for general-purpose robotic control.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising path to generalist robot control, but their inference latency causes observation staleness when generated actions are executed asynchronously. Several methods have been proposed concurrently to mitigate this problem: inference-time inpainting (IT-RTC), training-time delay simulation (TT-RTC), future-state-aware conditioning (VLASH), and lightweight residual correction (A2C2). Each takes a fundamentally different approach, but they have so far been evaluated independently with different codebases, base policies, and protocols. We present a systematic comparison of these four methods under controlled conditions. We develop two unified codebases that integrate all methods with harmonized library and dataset versions, and we benchmark them on the Kinetix suite with MLPMixer policies and on the LIBERO manipulation benchmark with SmolVLA, sweeping inference delays up to $d=20$ control steps. A2C2's per-step residual correction is the most effective method on Kinetix, holding above 90% solve rate up to $d=8$, and also leads on LIBERO from $d=4$ onwards. IT-RTC is competitive at low delays but degrades sharply under long chunks ($H=30$) and high delays. TT-RTC is the most robust training-based method: stable across d_\max choices, generalizes beyond its training delay distribution, and adds zero inference overhead. VLASH exhibits a clear low-delay vs. high-delay trade-off governed by the fine-tuning delay range [0,d_\max]. Code is available at https://github.com/TheAyos/async-vla-inference

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation by leveraging pre-trained vision-language backbones. However, in downstream robotic settings, they are typically fine-tuned with limited data, leading to overfitting to specific instruction formulations and leaving robustness to paraphrased instructions underexplored. To study this gap, we introduce LIBERO-Para, a controlled benchmark that independently varies action expressions and object references for fine-grained analysis of linguistic generalization. Across seven VLA configurations (0.6B-7.5B), we observe consistent performance degradation of 22-52 pp under paraphrasing. This degradation is primarily driven by object-level lexical variation: even simple synonym substitutions cause large drops, indicating reliance on surface-level matching rather than semantic grounding. Moreover, 80-96% of failures arise from planning-level trajectory divergence rather than execution errors, showing that paraphrasing disrupts task identification. Binary success rate treats all paraphrases equally, obscuring whether models perform consistently across difficulty levels or rely on easier cases. To address this, we propose PRIDE, a metric that quantifies paraphrase difficulty using semantic and syntactic factors. Our benchmark and corresponding code are available at: https://github.com/cau-hai-lab/LIBERO-Para

Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) promise to ground language instructions in robot control, yet in practice often fail to faithfully follow language. When presented with instructions that lack strong scene-specific supervision, VLAs suffer from counterfactual failures: they act based on vision shortcuts induced by dataset biases, repeatedly executing well-learned behaviors and selecting objects frequently seen during training regardless of language intent. To systematically study it, we introduce LIBERO-CF, the first counterfactual benchmark for VLAs that evaluates language following capability by assigning alternative instructions under visually plausible LIBERO layouts. Our evaluation reveals that counterfactual failures are prevalent yet underexplored across state-of-the-art VLAs. We propose Counterfactual Action Guidance (CAG), a simple yet effective dual-branch inference scheme that explicitly regularizes language conditioning in VLAs. CAG combines a standard VLA policy with a language-unconditioned Vision-Action (VA) module, enabling counterfactual comparison during action selection. This design reduces reliance on visual shortcuts, improves robustness on under-observed tasks, and requires neither additional demonstrations nor modifications to existing architectures or pretrained models. Extensive experiments demonstrate its plug-and-play integration across diverse VLAs and consistent improvements. For example, on LIBERO-CF, CAG improves $π_{0.5}$ by 9.7% in language following accuracy and 3.6% in task success on under-observed tasks using a training-free strategy, with further gains of 15.5% and 8.5%, respectively, when paired with a VA model. In real-world evaluations, CAG reduces counterfactual failures of 9.4% and improves task success by 17.2% on average.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models provide strong action priors for robotic manipulation, but their reactive behavior can fail under distribution shift and long-horizon task structure. Recent VLA-guided planning methods improve execution by using pretrained policies to guide tree search, yet node selection still depends heavily on policy priors and visit-count exploration. Consequently, when the policy favors poor actions, the planner lacks a learned value signal to correct this bias. Prior work has shown that VLA representations encode rollout success and failure information, suggesting that they may also support value estimation during planning. We introduce Value-Guided Vision-Language-Action Planning and Search (V-VLAPS), which augments VLA-guided planning with a lightweight value head trained on offline VLA rollouts to predict Monte Carlo returns. These predictions guide Monte Carlo Tree Search in simulation toward higher-value branches. Across five LIBERO suites, V-VLAPS matches value-free planning baseline at the default search budget in aggregate, and analysis shows that many hard failures are root-level timeouts where predicted values are weakly separated. With a larger search budget, V-VLAPS improves over the baseline in all task suites with +6 percentage points on LIBERO-Object and +4 percentage points on LIBERO-10. Our results suggest that VLA representations can support not only failure prediction, but also value-guided planning when search reaches branches where value-based ranking matters.

Monte Carlo tree search is attractive for robotic manipulation because it can improve action selection through simulation without requiring a fully differentiable policy. In uncertain domains, however, sparse terminal rewards and noisy transitions can make shallow search brittle: many candidate branches remain indistinguishable until late rollouts, and small simulation budgets amplify this ambiguity. This paper presents Reward-Centered ReST-MCTS, a decision-making framework that decomposes intermediate feedback into rule, heuristic, optional neural, and value-estimation channels, centers the resulting process signal against matched task contexts, and uses it to bias or repair search while preserving terminal-task evaluation. The primary evidence is intentionally tiered. Local tasks and matched ManiSkill diagnostics isolate reward-center mechanisms and ablations; matched option-level ManiSkill sweeps test robustness under primitive failure, observation noise, and initial-pose shifts while not claiming standard benchmark superiority; and an official same-backbone OpenVLA-OFT/LIBERO bridge tests bounded VLA action repair. The OpenVLA-OFT clean reproduction reaches 10/10 LIBERO-Spatial successes both with and without RCRM-Guard. A single-suite same-backbone action-channel stress artifact over ten paired LIBERO-Spatial action-channel stress episodes records 0/10 unguarded successes and 9/10 guarded successes. Additional observation-noise, language-perturbation, and visual-distractor probes are reported as coverage and negative-result context rather than superiority evidence. The resulting claim is bounded: Reward-Centered ReST-MCTS is an inspectable test-time verifier for same-backbone high-uncertainty manipulation, not a replacement VLA policy or a broad standard-benchmark superiority claim.