Radiology VLMs
VLM: Vision-Language Model
Overview
Radiology vision-language models connect images such as chest X-rays, CT, and MRI with reports and clinical questions to support diagnosis, report writing, image retrieval, and tracking change over time. Common approaches include contrastive image-report pretraining, instruction-tuned multimodal language models, and anatomy-aware grounding; newer systems also use clinical rewards, retrieval, tools, and expert gaze to guide their outputs. Evaluation spans tasks and benchmarks such as MIMIC-CXR, IU X-Ray, and CT-RATE, with growing attention to localization, longitudinal reasoning, uncertainty, and performance across institutions and languages. A central challenge is ensuring that fluent answers reflect image evidence rather than text cues or learned shortcuts, so benchmark scores must be weighed against robustness tests and radiologist assessment.
Latest papers
110 papers13 papers in the last four weeks, up 18% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.
XMedFusion: A Knowledge-Guided Multimodal Perception and Reasoning Framework for Autonomous Medical Systems
CheXanatomy: Anatomy-Aware Vision-Language Modeling for Chest Radiographs
A Vision-language Framework for Comparative Reasoning in Radiology
Does Language Shift Break Medical Vision-Language Models? Indonesian Radiology Visual Question Answering Case Study
GLINT: Sparsely Gated Vision-Language Alignment for Fine-Grained Radiology Representations
CCS: Clinical Consensus Selection for Radiology Report Generation
BioFact-MoE: Biologically Factorized Mixture of Experts for Vision-Language Prognostic Modeling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
DDX-TRACE: A Benchmark for Medical Diagnostic Trajectories in VLMs
MedExpMem: Adapting Experience Memory for Differential Diagnosis
Regulating Anatomy-Aware Rewards via Trajectory-Integral Feedback for Volumetric Computed Tomography Analysis
*Evaluation Hallucinations*'', where models optimize linguistic fluency rather than factual clinical correctness, leading to diagnostically critical errors. To bridge this gap, we introduce the **Clinical Abnormality Benchmarking Substrate (CABS)**, a structured system that decomposes radiology reports into verifiable clinical semantic units. Using CABS, we identify a Mechanistic Divergence'' in standard RL, where surface-similarity rewards drive policy gradients to bypass medical facts. We therefore propose Trajectory-Integral Feedback GRPO (TIF-GRPO), a novel framework integrating control-theoretic principles into policy optimization. By formulating clinical reasoning as a pseudo-temporal trajectory for anomaly discovery, TIF-GRPO regulates anatomy-aware rewards via an integral feedback loop that penalizes persistent omissions as cumulative state errors and suppresses hallucinations as excessive control effort. Experiments on 3D CT benchmarks demonstrate that our approach significantly enhances abnormality detection and clinical faithfulness, establishing a new paradigm for fine-grained regulation in medical VLMs. Our project is available at GitHub.