Self-Improving Agents
Overview
Self-improving agents study how systems can learn from their own actions and outcomes to perform better on later tasks, from coding and web use to robotics and long-horizon games. Common approaches turn successes and failures into reusable memories or executable skills, revise prompts and agent harnesses, or update model parameters through fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. Work increasingly uses repeated trials, held-out tasks, execution-based checks, and external evaluators to test whether improvements transfer rather than merely exploit a score. The central tension is that feedback and self-authored tests can be unreliable, so genuine progress must be balanced against regression, reward hacking, safety risks, and the cost of verification.
Latest papers
171 papers57 papers in the last four weeks, up 171% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
The Self Driving Portfolio: Agentic Architecture for Institutional Asset Management
PsychAgent: An Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning Agent for Self-Evolving Psychological Counselor
PsychAgent) for psychological counseling. First, we establish a Memory-Augmented Planning Engine tailored for longitudinal multi-session interactions, which ensures therapeutic continuity through persistent memory and strategic planning. Second, to support self-evolution, we design a Skill Evolution Engine that extracts new practice-grounded skills from historical counseling trajectories. Finally, we introduce a Reinforced Internalization Engine that integrates the evolved skills into the model via rejection fine-tuning, aiming to improve performance across diverse scenarios. Comparative analysis shows that our approach achieves higher scores than strong general LLMs (e.g., GPT-5.4, Gemini-3) and domain-specific baselines across all reported evaluation dimensions. These results suggest that lifelong learning can improve the consistency and overall quality of multi-session counseling responses.Meta-TTL: Meta-Learning Self-Improvement Policies for Language Agents
Empirical Validation of the Classification-Verification Dichotomy for AI Safety Gates
Experiential Reflective Learning for Self-Improving LLM Agents
Understanding the Challenges in Iterative Generative Optimization with LLMs
Bilevel Autoresearch: Meta-Autoresearching Itself
Polaris: A Gödel Agent Framework for Small Language Models through Experience-Abstracted Policy Repair
Hyperagents
Adaptive Workflow Intelligence: A Cognitive Architecture for Context-Driven Enterprise Automation
Internalizing Agency from Reflective Experience
HCP-DCNet: A Hierarchical Causal Primitive Dynamic Composition Network for Self-Improving Causal Understanding
Reflection-Driven Self-Improving Language Model Agents for Adaptive RAN Slicing
EPOCH: An Agentic Protocol for Multi-Round System Optimization
Experience-Guided Self-Adaptive Cascaded Agents for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis with Reduced Biopsy Referrals
screening clinic' agent, restricted to classification models as tools, selectively filters out benign and normal cases from further diagnostic escalation when malignancy risk and uncertainty are estimated as low. Cases that have higher risks are escalated to the diagnostic clinic' agent, which integrates richer perception and radiological description tools to make a secondary decision on biopsy referral. To improve agent performance, past records of pathology-confirmed outcomes along with image embeddings, model predictions, and historical agent actions are stored in a memory bank as structured decision trajectories. For each new case, BUSD-Agent retrieves similar past cases based on image, model response and confidence similarity to condition the agent's current decision policy. This enables retrieval-conditioned in-context adaptation that dynamically adjusts model trust and escalation thresholds from prior experiences without parameter updates. Evaluation across 10 breast ultrasound datasets shows that the proposed experience-guided workflow reduces diagnostic escalation in BUSD-Agent from 84.95% to 58.72% and overall biopsy referrals from 59.50% to 37.08%, compared to the same architecture without trajectory conditioning, while improving average screening specificity by 68.48% and diagnostic specificity by 6.33%.