Regret

We study a stochastic bandit algorithm motivated by retry-aware objectives that value the best outcome among multiple attempts, such as pass@$k$ and max@$k$. Given a posterior over arm values, ReMax chooses a sampling distribution that maximizes the posterior expected maximum reward over $M$ virtual draws. Although this objective was introduced in reinforcement learning as an exploration mechanism under uncertainty, its regret properties in bandit problems have remained unclear. For Gaussian rewards and the first nontrivial case $M=2$, we characterize the optimal ReMax distribution through an expected-improvement balance condition and prove the first sublinear regret bound for ReMax. Our analysis separates the usual saturation behavior of suboptimal arms from a ReMax-specific underestimation effect, in which the optimal arm may be sampled too rarely after an unfavorable estimate. This explains why ReMax can be more exploitative than Thompson sampling (TS) and why its regret analysis is technically delicate. Experiments support this picture: ReMax often outperforms KL-UCB and Thompson sampling under mild underestimation, while posterior-variance scaling empirically mitigates severe underestimation.

We study reinforcement learning for episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) whose transitions are modelled by a multinomial logistic (MNL) model. Existing algorithms for MNL mixture MDPs yield a regret of $\smash{\tilde{O}(dH^2\sqrt{T})}$ (Li et al., 2024), where $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ the episode length, and $T$ the number of episodes. Inspired by the logistic bandit literature (Abeille et al., 2021; Faury et al., 2022; Boudart et al., 2026), we introduce a problem-dependent constant $\barσ\_T \leq 1/2$, measuring the normalised average variance of the optimal downstream value function along the learner's trajectory. We propose an algorithm achieving a regret of $\smash{\tilde{O}(dH^2\barσ\_T\sqrt{T})}$, which recovers the existing bound in the worst case and improves upon it for structured MDPs. For instance, for KL-constrained robust MDPs, $\barσ\_T = O(H^{-1})$, reducing the horizon dependence by a factor $H$. We further establish a matching $\smash{Ω(dH^2\barσ\_T\sqrt{T})}$ lower bound, proving minimax optimality (up to logarithmic factors) and fully characterising the regret complexity of MNL mixture MDPs for the first time.

Many consumer decisions are repeated choices under uncertainty. Standard models capture these decisions using Bayesian learning and dynamic programming: consumers update beliefs from feedback and use those beliefs to guide future choices. In many markets, however, learning does not restart when consumers enter a new context: prior experience with a brand, product, or provider can shape beliefs in later, related decisions. We study this cross-context knowledge transfer, or meta-learning, in sequential choice. We design a hierarchical laboratory task in which participants repeatedly choose among airlines across routes and observe noisy binary outcomes. Reduced-form evidence shows that participants improve not only within routes, but also across routes: they choose better airlines earlier in later routes and reduce pseudo-regret. To identify the mechanism behind this transfer, we compare human choices to a no-transfer benchmark and a fully integrated Bayesian meta-learning benchmark. In particular, we introduce a class of boundedly rational meta dynamic programming policies, BRMDP(D), that approximate full integration using a limited number of hyper-posterior draws, denoted by D. Trial-by-trial likelihood comparisons show that low-D boundedly rational meta-learning, especially BRMDP(1), fits participant behavior better than both no transfer and fully integrated Bayesian transfer. Consumers, therefore, transfer brand-level regularities across contexts, but through coarse representations of prior uncertainty. The findings imply that models of consumer learning should allow for approximate cross-context transfer, and that managerial counterfactuals based on either no-transfer or fully integrated learning can be misleading.

We study episodic reinforcement learning with fixed reward and transition functions, but with episode-dependent admissible action sets that are observed at the start of each episode. Performance is measured by cumulative regret against the episode-wise optimal value, $\sum_{k=1}^K [V^{*,M^k} - V^{π^k,M^k}]$, where $M^k$ represents the action context in the $k$-th episode. We show that the MVP algorithm naturally extends to this framework and enjoys strong theoretical guarantees. In particular, we establish a minimax regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^3K\log L})$ for adversarial contexts, where $L$ denotes the number of possible contexts. This result implies a regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^3K})$ for stochastic contexts. We further translate the stochastic regret guarantee into a sample complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(SAH^3/ε^2)$ for a fixed context distribution. In addition, we derive a gap-dependent regret bound of $$\widetilde O\left( \inf_{p\in [0,1)} \left( \frac{1}{Δ_{\min}^{p}} + pKΔ_{\min}^{p} \right)\log K \cdot \mathrm{poly}(S,A,H) \right),$$ where $Δ_{\min}^{p}$ is the global $p$-trimmed positive-gap floor over suboptimal $(h,s,a)$ triples. This bound can substantially improve upon the minimax rate when the relevant suboptimality gaps are large.

Regret is the cost of uncertainty in algorithmic decision-making. Quantifying regret typically requires computationally expensive simulation via Sample Average Approximation (SAA), with complexity $\mathcal{O}(Bn^{2}d^{3})$ in the number of scenarios $B$, variables $n$, and constraints $d$. % This paper proves that expected regret in any stochastic optimization problem admits the exact decomposition % \begin{equation*} \mathrm{Regret}(c) = \mathrm{Cov}(c,,π^{}(c)) + R(c), \end{equation} % where $c$ is the vector of uncertain parameters, $π^{*}(c)$ is the optimal decision, and $R(c)$ is a residual whose magnitude we bound explicitly under Lipschitz, smooth, and strongly convex conditions. % For linear programs and unconstrained quadratic programs, including the classical Markowitz portfolio problem, we prove $R(c)=0$ exactly, so that $\mathrm{Regret}(c) = \mathrm{Cov}(c,π^{*}(c))$ holds without approximation. % When historical cost-decision pairs $\{(c_i, π^*(c_i))\}$ are available, the covariance can be estimated in $\mathcal{O}(nd^{2})$ time, which is orders of magnitude faster than SAA. The estimation is performed by a single pass through the data. % We derive concentration bounds, a central limit theorem, and an asymptotically unbiased residual estimator, and we validate all results on synthetic LP, QP, and integer programming instances and on a rolling-window portfolio experiment using ten years of CRSP equity data.

Many online decision problems over combinatorial actions are addressed via convex relaxations, leading to online convex optimization with piecewise linear objectives and induced polyhedral structure. We show that regret in such problems is governed by \emph{polyhedral instability}: the number of changes of the active region. Under full information feedback and fixed partition assumptions, if $\mathrm{RS}_T$ denotes the number of region switches and $V_{\max}$ the maximum number of vertices per region, we prove $\Regret_T= Θ(\sqrt{(1+\mathrm{RS}_T)\,T\,\log V_{\max}})$ interpolating between experts-like and dimension-dependent OCO rates. For online submodular--concave games under Lovász convexification, this reduces to the permutation-switch count $\mathrm{SC}_T$, yielding the matching rate $\Regret_T= Θ(\sqrt{(1+\mathrm{SC}_T)\,T\,\log n})$. Experiments on synthetic and real combinatorial problems (shortest path, influence maximization) validate the predicted scaling and indicate that low-instability regimes can arise in practice without explicit enumeration of actions.

Online Multiple Testing (OMT), a fundamental pillar of sequential statistical inference, traditionally evaluates the False Discovery Rate (FDR) and statistical power in isolation, obscuring the highly asymmetric costs of false positives and false negatives in modern automated pipelines. To unify this evaluation, we introduce $\textit{Weighted Regret}$. Under this metric, we prove the $\textit{Duality of Regret Conservation}$: purely deterministic procedures ensuring strict FDR control inevitably incur an $Ω(T)$ linear regret penalty, as threshold depletion during signal-sparse cold starts forces massive false negatives. Tailored for exogenous testing streams, we propose Decoupled-OMT (DOMT) as a baseline-agnostic meta-wrapper. By incorporating a history-decoupled, strictly non-negative random perturbation, DOMT rescues purely deterministic baselines from severe threshold depletion. Crucially, it preserves exact asymptotic safety in stationary environments and rigorously bounds finite-sample error inflation during cold-starts. Guaranteeing zero additional false negatives, it yields an order-optimal $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ regret reduction in bursty environments, with a derived ``Cold-Start Tax'' characterizing the exact phase transition of algorithmic superiority. Experiments validate that DOMT consistently curtails empirical weighted regret, achieving an order-optimal sublinear mitigation of threshold depletion to navigate the non-stationary Pareto frontier.

We study infinite-horizon average-reward constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) under the weakly communicating assumption. Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish strong duality for weakly communicating average-reward CMDPs over stationary policies with finite state and action spaces. Despite the absence of a linear programming formulation and the resulting nonconvexity under the weakly communicating setting, we show that strong duality still holds by carefully exploiting the geometric structure of the occupation measure set. Second, building on this result, we propose a primal--dual clipped value iteration algorithm for learning weakly communicating average-reward linear CMDPs. Our algorithm achieves regret and constraint violation bounds of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$, improving upon the best known bounds, where $T$ denotes the number of interactions. Our approach extends clipped value iteration to the constrained setting and adapts it to a finite-horizon approximation, which stabilizes the dual variable and is crucial for achieving improved regret bounds. To analyze this, we develop a novel approach based on strong duality that enables the decomposition of the composite Lagrangian regret into separate bounds on regret and constraint violation.

We address the problem of maximizing Gain from Trade (GFT) in repeated buyer-seller exchanges subject to global budget balance constraints. While this problem is well-understood in purely adversarial and stochastic settings, these environments exhibit a sharp dichotomy: adversarial environments allow for no-regret learning against the best fixed-price mechanism, whereas stochastic environments allow for no-regret learning against the best distribution over prices that is budget balanced in expectation. This gap is significant, as policies balanced in expectation can increase the GFT by a multiplicative factor of two. In this work, we bridge these extremes by studying perturbed markets, where an underlying stochastic distribution is subject to an adversarial corruption $C$. We design an algorithm that adaptively scales with the level of corruption, achieving an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4}) + \mathcal{O}(C\log(T))$ regret bound against the best budget-balanced distribution over prices. Simultaneously, our algorithm maintains the worst-case $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4})$ regret bound relative to a per-round budget-balanced baseline, ensuring optimality even in fully adversarial environments.

Guided-diffusion black-box optimization (BO) has shown strong empirical performance on structured design problems such as molecules and crystals, but its regret behavior remains poorly understood. Existing BO regret analyses typically rely on maximum information gain, non-pretrained surrogate models, or exact acquisition maximization -- assumptions that break down in modern diffusion -- BO pipelines, where pretrained diffusion models serve as powerful priors over valid structures and acquisition maximization is replaced by approximate sampling over astronomically large discrete spaces. We develop a first certificate-based expected simple-regret framework for guided-diffusion BO that avoids maximum-information-gain bounds, RKHS assumptions, and exact acquisition maximization. The central quantity in our analysis is mass lift: the increase in probability mass assigned to near-optimal designs relative to the pretrained generator. This view explains how exponential-looking finite-budget convergence and polynomial acceleration can all arise from the same mechanism. We also give practical diagnostics for estimating search exponents from finite candidate pools and a proposal-corrected resampling construction that provides a fully certified sampler instance.

We study the $\textit{single-index bandit}$ problem, where rewards depend on an unknown one-dimensional projection of high-dimensional contexts through an unknown reward function. This model extends linear and generalized linear bandits to a nonparametric setting, and is particularly relevant when the reward function is not known in advance. While optimal regret guarantees are known for monotone reward functions, the general non-monotone case remains poorly understood, with the best known bound being $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4})$ (under standard boundedness and Lipschitz assumptions on the reward function [Kang et al., 2025]). We close this gap by establishing the optimal regret for general single-index bandits. We propose a simple two-phase algorithm, namely, Zoomed Single Index Bandit with Upper Confidence Bound ($\texttt{ZoomSIB-UCB}$), that first estimates the projection direction via a normalized Stein estimator, and then reduces the problem to a one-dimensional bandit using discretization and finally use UCB. This approach achieves a regret of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$, and improves significantly upon prior work without any additional assumptions. We also prove a matching minimax lower bound of $\tildeΩ(T^{2/3})$, showing that the upper bound is essentially tight. Our upper and lower bounds together provide a sharp characterization of the regret in single-index bandits. Moreover, the empirical results further demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our approach.

We extend quantum state tomography with minimal cumulative disturbance, first investigated in [arXiv:2406.18370], to arbitrary finite-dimensional pure states. A learner sequentially receives fresh copies of an unknown pure state, chooses a rank-one projector for each copy using the previous outcomes, and performs the corresponding two-outcome projective measurement. The goal is to learn the state while keeping the chosen projectors close to the unknown state in order to minimize disturbance. The qubit solution relies on the special geometry of the Bloch sphere and does not extend directly to qudits, where pure states form a curved manifold. We show that this obstruction can be overcome by working locally on the pure-state manifold. The algorithm proceeds in epochs. In each epoch, it fixes a current estimate, measures pairs of nearby rank-one projectors obtained by moving in opposite tangent directions, and takes differences of the corresponding outcomes. This gives an exact linear observation of the tangent component of the error. The resulting local linear models are combined with a robust variance-adaptive estimator and a hot-start regularization that transfers precision across epochs. For every unknown pure state in dimension $d$, after $T$ measured copies, our protocol achieves cumulative regret $\mathcal{O}(d^3\log^2 T)$, and at each intermediate time $t\leq T$ its current estimate has online infidelity $\mathcal{O}(d^3\log(T)/t)$. Hence, pure-state tomography with essentially no cumulative disturbance is not a peculiarity of qubits but a geometric phenomenon that persists for qudits.

Susceptibilities are a technique for neural network interpretability that studies the response of posterior expectation values of observables to perturbations of the loss. We generalize this construction to the setting of the regret in deep reinforcement learning and investigate the utility of susceptibilities in a simple gridworld model that nevertheless exhibits non-trivial stagewise development. We argue that susceptibilities reveal internal features of the development of the model in parameter space that one cannot detect purely by studying the development of the learned policy. We validate these results with activation-steering, and discuss the framework's extension to RLHF post-training.

We design the first regret guarantees for robust dynamic pricing that decouple the dependence on the corruption $C$ and the time horizon $T$. In dynamic pricing, a seller with unlimited supply of a good interacts with a stream of buyers over $T$ rounds, with the goal of maximizing revenue. At each round $t$, the seller posts a price $p_t$, and the buyer purchases the good only if their unknown valuation $v^\star$ exceeds this price. The seller observes only the binary feedback $\mathbb{I} \left\{ p_t \leq v^\star \right\}$, indicating whether a sale occurred. In the \emph{robust} pricing setting, a malicious adversary is allowed to corrupt this feedback in at most $C$ rounds. Even if the learner knows the corruption $C$, the best known regret bound is $\mathcal{O}(C\log\log T)$ by Gupta et al. [2025]. This leaves as an open problem to ``decouple'' the dependence on $C$ and $T$. In this work, we resolve this open problem. In particular, we develop a robust variant of binary search that achieves regret $\mathcal{O}(C+\log T)$ when the corruption $C$ is known and $\mathcal{O}(C+\log^2 T)$ when the corruption is unknown.

Agnostic online learning is classically solved via a reduction to the realizable setting, utilizing Littlestone's Standard Optimal Algorithm (SOA) as a base learner. However, the SOA is computationally intractable to execute even for a single round. To overcome this barrier, recent work in oracle-efficient online learning replaces the SOA with a realizable base learner that accesses the concept class exclusively through an offline empirical risk minimization (ERM) oracle. While such agnostic learners achieve near-optimal expected regret, they suffer from a doubly-exponential oracle complexity of $O\big(T^{2^{O(d_\mathrm{LD})}}\big)$, where $d_\mathrm{LD}$ is the Littlestone dimension and $T$ is the number of rounds. In this work, we significantly improve this oracle complexity while relying on an even weaker primitive: a weak-consistency oracle, which merely decides whether a given labeled dataset is realizable. At the core of our approach is an adaptive and dynamic agnostic-to-realizable reduction that actively prunes non-realizable label sequences on the fly. By using the VC dimension ($d_\mathrm{VC}$) to bound the number of dynamically maintained active paths, our algorithm reduces the total query complexity down to $O(T^{d_\mathrm{VC}+1})$ while perfectly preserving near-optimal expected regret. Crucially, this dynamic pruning also yields a memory reduction over the standard reduction. Furthermore, we formally quantify the regret--oracle complexity tradeoff, providing upper bounds that smoothly interpolate between restricted query budgets and attainable expected regret. We complement these with lower bounds proving that any learner restricted to $Q = o(\sqrt{T})$ queries must suffer an expected regret of $Ω(T/Q)$.

We present the first theoretical guarantees for differentially private online reinforcement learning (RL) with general function approximation, extending beyond prior work restricted to tabular and linear settings. Our approach combines a batched policy update scheme with the exponential mechanism, together with a novel regret analysis. We show that, even under general function approximation, the regret in the model-free setting under differential privacy matches the state of the art for the linear case, scaling as $\widetilde{O}(K^{3/5})$, where $K$ denotes the number of episodes. As an important by-product, we also establish the first regret bound for online RL with batch update that depends on the standard complexity measure of coverability, complementing existing results based on a newly introduced Eluder-Condition class. In addition, we uncover fundamental gaps in recent results for private RL with linear function approximation, thereby clarifying its landscape.

We study the distribution of regret in stochastic multi-armed bandits and episodic reinforcement learning through a unified framework. We formalize a distributional regret bound as a probabilistic guarantee that holds uniformly over all confidence levels $δ\in (0,1]$, thereby characterizing the regret distribution across the full range of $δ$. We present a simple UCBVI-style algorithm with exploration bonus $\min\{c_{1,k}/N, c_{2,k}/\sqrt{N}\}$, where $N$ denotes the visit count and $(c_{1,k},c_{2,k})$ are user-specified parameters. For arbitrary parameter sequences, we derive general gap-independent and gap-dependent distributional regret bounds, yielding a principled characterization of how the parameters control the trade-off between expected performance, tail risk, and instance-dependent behavior. In particular, our bounds achieve optimal trade-offs between expected and distributional regret in both minimax and instance-dependent regimes. As a special case, for multi-armed bandits with $A$ arms and horizon $T$, we obtain a distributional regret bound of order $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{AT}\log(1/δ))$, confirming the conjecture of Lattimore & Szepesvári (2020, Section 17.1) for the first time.

In sequential search, alternatives are tested until the true class is found. Standard proper scoring rules like log loss are local, ignoring the ranking of competitors and misaligning model evaluation with search utility. We show that sequential search induces a pairwise structure that overcomes this. By analyzing the expected cost of optimal search under varying testing costs, we derive Pandora's Regret: a closed-form, pairwise-additive, and strictly proper scoring rule. Pandora's Regret both elicits true probabilities and penalizes rank-reversing miscalibrations where distractors outrank the true class. Our construction yields a one-parameter Beta family that balances penalties for rank-swapping versus probability magnitude, while retaining a grounded interpretation as expected search cost. We prove that log loss, accuracy, and macro-F1 rely on implicit decision models misaligned with sequential search. Across 597 MedMNIST models, Pandora-based metrics better predict clinical diagnostic costs than standard alternatives, extending decision-theoretic scoring rule construction to the multiclass setting.

Self-normalized martingale inequalities lie at the heart of confidence ellipsoids for online least squares and, more broadly, many bandit and reinforcement-learning results. Yet existing vector and scalar results typically rely on bounded covariates and an explicit regularization matrix, producing bounds that are \emph{not scale-invariant}: although the self-normalized quantity is scale-invariant by definition, its standard upper bounds are not. We characterize when scale-invariant upper bounds on self-normalized martingales are possible. Without further assumptions, we prove that nontrivial scale-invariant bounds exist only in dimension $d=1$; moreover, in $d=1$ we obtain $O(\log T)$ scale-invariant self-normalized bounds without any assumptions on the covariates. In contrast, for $d>1$ we show that no nontrivial scale-invariant bound can hold in full generality. We then connect this dichotomy to \emph{doubly-uniform} regret in online linear regression (i.e., regret bounds that are simultaneously independent of the covariate scale and the comparator norm) and use it to resolve the open question of Gaillard, Gerchinovitz, Huard, and Stoltz, \emph{``Uniform regret bounds over $\mathbb{R}^d$ for the sequential linear regression problem with the square loss''} (ALT 2019): in $d=1$ we give an explicit algorithm with $O(\log T)$ doubly-uniform regret, whereas for $d>1$ sublinear doubly-uniform regret is impossible. Finally, under a natural \emph{smoothness} condition (bounded Radon--Nikodym derivatives of the conditional covariate laws with respect to a fixed base measure), we recover sublinear regret for $d>1$ without bounded covariates and derive a self-normalized concentration inequality free of the usual regularization penalties, yielding arguably a first natural scale-invariant bound for adaptive, non-i.i.d. vector martingales.

Decision-Focused Learning (DFL) trains predictors to improve downstream decision quality, but computing regret gradients typically requires differentiating through solvers or relying on surrogate losses, which can be computationally expensive or deviate from the true objective. We show that, under standard regularity with locally stable active constraints, the regret gradient admits a closed-form geometric characterization, equivalent to the prediction error projected onto the tangent space of active constraints, scaled by local curvature. This reveals that regret gradients can be obtained by filtering decision-irrelevant components from the MSE gradient, providing a simpler and more direct alternative to existing approaches. Based on this, we propose PEAR (Projected Error As Regret-gradient), which computes regret gradients via a reduced linear system over active constraints, avoiding differentiation through solver iterations or additional optimization solves. Experiments on LP benchmarks and a real-world QP task show that PEAR achieves the best decision quality among all baselines while being the most computationally efficient, with gains that persist under constraint shifts.

In multi-armed bandits, the most-explored arms are the most informative, while reward maximization typically pulls only the best arm. We study the tradeoff between identifying arm means accurately and accumulating reward, and present an algorithm with regret guarantees that interpolates between the two objectives. We provide both upper and lower bounds and validate empirically.

We study the $K$-armed logistic bandit problem, where at each round, the agent observes $K$ feature vectors associated with $K$ actions. Existing approaches that achieve a rate-optimal $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{dT})$ regret bound rely heavily on context diversity assumptions, such as strict positivity of the minimum eigenvalue of a context covariance matrix. These assumptions, however, impose strong restrictions on the context process, as they rule out the situation where the context vectors are concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. In this paper, we propose SupSplitLog, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first algorithm for logistic bandits that achieves $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{dT})$ regret without any context diversity assumption. The key idea is to split the collected samples into two disjoint subsets when constructing estimators; one is used to compute an initial-point estimator, while the other is used to apply a Newton-type one-step correction procedure. The splitting rule is carefully designed to balance the accuracy requirements of the initial-point estimator and the one-step correction procedure. Moreover, SupSplitLog strictly improves on the existing algorithms in terms of the dependence on dimension $d$ in the regret upper bound. Furthermore, SupSplitLog can be adapted simply to deduce a regret bound that grows with a data-dependent complexity measure, avoiding a direct dependence on $d$, which is favorable when the context vectors are concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. We also provide experimental results that demonstrate numerically the superiority of our algorithm, validating the theoretical results.

We study the problem of adaptive control of the stochastic linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with constraints that must be satisfied at every time step. Prior work on the multidimensional problem has shown $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret and satisfaction of robust constraints, leaving open the question of whether $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret can be attained in the constrained LQR setting. We contribute to this problem by showing $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret and satisfaction of chance constraints. This type of constraints allow us to handle unbounded noise and also enable analytical techniques not directly applicable to robust constraints. Our proposed algorithm for this problem uses an SDP to select an optimistic policy, and then "scales back" this policy until it is verifiably-safe. Our theoretical analysis establishes regret and constraint guarantees via a key lemma that bounds the system covariance in terms of the chosen policy. This covariance-based analysis is in contrast with the cost-to-go based analysis that is typically used in adaptive LQR.

Consider betting against a sequence of data in $[0,1]$, where one is allowed to make any bet that is fair if the data have a conditional mean $m_0 \in (0,1)$. Cover's universal portfolio algorithm delivers a worst-case regret of $O(\ln n)$ compared to the best constant bet in hindsight, and this bound is unimprovable against adversarially generated data. In this work, we present a novel mixture betting strategy that combines insights from Robbins and Cover, and exhibits a different behavior: it eventually produces a regret of $O(\ln \ln n)$ on almost all paths (a measure-one set of paths if each conditional mean equals $m_0$ and intrinsic variance increases to $\infty$), but has an $O(\log n)$ regret on the complement (a measure zero set of paths). Our paper appears to be the first to point out the value in hedging two very different strategies to achieve a best-of-both-worlds adaptivity to stochastic data and protection against adversarial data. We contrast our results to those in Agrawal and Ramdas [2026] for a sub-Gaussian mixture on unbounded data: their worst-case regret has to be unbounded, but a similar hedging delivers both an optimal betting growth-rate and an almost sure $\ln\ln n$ regret on stochastic data. Finally, our strategy witnesses a sharp game-theoretic upper law of the iterated logarithm, analogous to Shafer and Vovk [2005].

Uncertainty quantification is crucial in safety-critical systems, where decisions must be made under uncertainty. In particular, we consider the problem of online uncertainty quantification, where data points arrive sequentially. Online conformal prediction is a principled online uncertainty quantification method that dynamically constructs a prediction set at each time step. While existing methods for online conformal prediction provide long-run coverage guarantees without any distributional assumptions, they typically assume a full feedback setting in which the true label is always observed. In this paper, we propose a novel learning method for online conformal prediction with partial feedback from an adaptive adversary-a more challenging setup where the true label is revealed only when it lies inside the constructed prediction set. Specifically, we formulate online conformal prediction as an adversarial bandit problem by treating each candidate prediction set as an arm. Building on an existing algorithm for adversarial bandits, our method achieves a long-run coverage guarantee by explicitly establishing its connection to the regret of the learner. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) and non-i.i.d. settings, showing that it successfully controls the miscoverage rate while maintaining a reasonable size of the prediction set.

We study the tail behavior of regret in stochastic multi-armed bandits for algorithms that are asymptotically optimal in expectation. While minimizing expected regret is the classical objective, recent work shows that even such algorithms can exhibit heavy regret tails, incurring large regret with non-negligible probability. Existing sharp characterizations of regret tails are largely restricted to parametric settings, such as single-parameter exponential families. In this work, we extend the $\KLinf$-UCB algorithm of to a broad nonparametric class of reward distributions satisfying mild assumptions, and establish its asymptotic optimality in expectation. We then analyze the tail behavior of its regret and derive a novel upper bound on the regret tail probability. As special cases, our results recover regret-tail guarantees for both bounded-support and heavy-tailed (moment-bounded) bandit models. Moreover, for the special case of finitely-supported reward distributions, our upper bound matches the known lower bound exactly. Our results thus provide a unified and tight characterization of regret tails for asymptotically optimal KL-based UCB algorithms, going beyond parametric models.

Modern machine learning systems, such as generative models and recommendation systems, often evolve through a cycle of deployment, user interaction, and periodic model updates. This differs from standard supervised learning frameworks, which focus on loss or regret minimization over a fixed sequence of prediction tasks. Motivated by this setting, we revisit the classical model of learning from equivalence queries, introduced by Angluin (1988). In this model, a learner repeatedly proposes hypotheses and, when a deployed hypothesis is inadequate, receives a counterexample. Under fully adversarial counterexample generation, however, the model can be overly pessimistic. In addition, most prior work assumes a \emph{full-information} setting, where the learner also observes the correct label of the counterexample, an assumption that is not always natural. We address these issues by restricting the environment to a broad class of less adversarial counterexample generators, which we call \emph{symmetric}. Informally, such generators choose counterexamples based only on the symmetric difference between the hypothesis and the target. This class captures natural mechanisms such as random counterexamples (Angluin and Dohrn, 2017; Bhatia, 2021; Chase, Freitag, and Reyzin, 2024), as well as generators that return the simplest counterexample according to a prescribed complexity measure. Within this framework, we study learning from equivalence queries under both full-information and bandit feedback. We obtain tight bounds on the number of learning rounds in both settings and highlight directions for future work. Our analysis combines a game-theoretic view of symmetric adversaries with adaptive weighting methods and minimax arguments.

We analyze the Bayesian regret of the Gaussian process posterior sampling reinforcement learning (GP-PSRL) algorithm. Posterior sampling is a heuristic for decision-making under uncertainty that has been used to develop successful algorithms for a variety of continuous control problems. However, theoretical work on GP-PSRL is limited. All known regret bounds either have a sub-optimal growth rate, require strong smoothness assumptions, or fail to properly account for the fact that the set of possible system states is unbounded. Through a recursive application of the Borell-Tsirelson-Ibragimov-Sudakov inequality, we show that, with high probability, the states actually visited by the algorithm are contained within a ball of near-constant radius. We then use the chaining method to control the regret suffered by GP-PSRL under weak smoothness conditions. Our main result is a Bayesian regret bound of the order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(H\sqrt{γ_TT})$, where $H$ is the horizon, $T$ is the number of time steps and $γ_T$ is the expected information gain. With this result, we resolve the limitations with prior theoretical work on PSRL, and provide the theoretical foundation and tools for analyzing PSRL in complex settings.

In contextual bilateral trade under full feedback, the posted price does not affect which valuations are observed. We show that in this model such action-independent feedback removes the polynomial adaptation penalty familiar from heavy-tailed bandits: fully parameter-free algorithms attain the oracle minimax $T$-exponents up to logarithmic factors, with no knowledge of the moment order $p \in (1,2)$ or its scale $σ_p$, and -- in the nonparametric case -- none of the effective Hölder smoothness $β\in (0,1]$. The statistic that makes model selection possible is a paired squared-loss difference, whose noise-square term cancels exactly, leaving noise damped by the candidate gap. The resulting bilateral-trade regret rates are new. Trader valuations have bounded conditional densities and heavy tails -- finite $p$-th moments for some $p \in (1,2)$, with possibly infinite variance. An epoch-based algorithm with truncated means achieves regret $\widetilde{O}(T^{(2-p)/p})$ in the parametric model and $\widetilde{O}(T^{1-2β(p-1)/(βp + d(p-1))})$ when the market value function is $β$-Hölder, with matching $Ω(\cdot)$ lower bounds -- under a mild nondegeneracy condition -- via Assouad's method and a fixed-support mixture construction -- characterizing the minimax rate in $T$ up to logarithmic factors over the effective smoothness range $β\in (0,1]$, interpolating between the classical nonparametric rate at $p{=}2$ and the trivial linear rate as $p \to 1^+$. The enabling structural step extends the self-bounding property of Bachoc et al. (ICML 2025) from bounded to real-valued valuations: within our conditionally independent, conditionally centered noise model, bounded conditional densities and finite first moments suffice for the expected regret of any price $π$ to satisfy $\mathbb{E}[g(m,V,W) - g(π,V,W)] \le L|m-π|^2$ -- no second moment is needed.

We consider the optimization problem of an expensive-to-evaluate black-box function, in which we can obtain noisy function values in parallel. For this problem, parallel Bayesian optimization (PBO) is a promising approach, which aims to optimize with fewer function evaluations by selecting a diverse input set for parallel evaluation. However, existing PBO methods suffer from poor practical performance or lack theoretical guarantees. In this study, we propose a PBO method, called randomized kriging believer (KB), based on a well-known KB heuristic and inheriting the advantages of the original KB: low computational complexity, a simple implementation, versatility across various BO methods, and applicability to asynchronous parallelization. Furthermore, we show that our randomized KB achieves Bayesian expected regret guarantees. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through experiments, including those on real-data emulators.

This work studies online episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with known transitions and develops best-of-both-worlds algorithms that achieve refined data-dependent regret bounds in the adversarial regime and variance-dependent regret bounds in the stochastic regime. We quantify MDP complexity using a first-order quantity and several new data-dependent measures for the adversarial regime, including a second-order quantity and a path-length measure, as well as variance-based measures for the stochastic regime. To adapt to these measures, we develop algorithms based on global optimization and policy optimization, both built on optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader with log-barrier regularization. For global optimization, our algorithms achieve first-order, second-order, and path-length regret bounds in the adversarial regime, and in the stochastic regime, they achieve a variance-aware gap-independent bound and a variance-aware gap-dependent bound that is polylogarithmic in the number of episodes. For policy optimization, our algorithms achieve the same data- and variance-dependent adaptivity, up to a factor of the episode horizon, by exploiting a new optimistic $Q$-function estimator. Finally, we establish regret lower bounds in terms of data-dependent complexity measures for the adversarial regime and a variance measure for the stochastic regime, implying that the regret upper bounds achieved by the global-optimization approach are nearly optimal.

We prove that Thompson sampling exhibits $\tilde{O}(σd \sqrt{T} + d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)})$ Bayesian regret in the linear-Gaussian bandit with a $\mathcal{N}(μ_0, Σ_0)$ prior distribution on the coefficients, where $d$ is the dimension, $T$ is the time horizon, $r$ is the maximum $\ell_2$ norm of the actions, and $σ^2$ is the noise variance. In contrast to existing regret bounds, this shows that to within logarithmic factors, the prior-dependent burn-in'' term $d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)}$ decouples additively from the minimax (long run) regret $σd \sqrt{T}$. Previous regret bounds exhibit a multiplicative dependence on these terms. We establish these results via a new elliptical potential'' lemma, and also provide a lower bound indicating that the burn-in term is unavoidable.

We study reinforcement learning for controlled diffusion processes with unbounded continuous state spaces, bounded continuous actions, and polynomially growing rewards: settings that arise naturally in finance, economics, and operations research. To overcome the challenges of continuous and high-dimensional domains, we introduce a model-based algorithm that adaptively partitions the joint state-action space. The algorithm maintains estimators of drift, volatility, and rewards within each partition, refining the discretization whenever estimation bias exceeds statistical confidence. This adaptive scheme balances exploration and approximation, enabling efficient learning in unbounded domains. Our analysis establishes regret bounds that depend on the problem horizon, state dimension, reward growth order, and a newly defined notion of zooming dimension tailored to unbounded diffusion processes. The bounds recover existing results for bounded settings as a special case, while extending theoretical guarantees to a broader class of diffusion-type problems. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of our approach through numerical experiments, including applications to high-dimensional problems such as multi-asset mean-variance portfolio selection.

Many prediction tasks can admit multiple models that can perform almost equally well. This phenomenon can undermine interpretability and safety when competing models assign conflicting predictions to individuals. In this work, we study how arbitrariness can arise in probabilistic classification tasks as a result of an effect that we call \emph{observational multiplicity}. We discuss how this effect arises in a broad class of practical applications where we learn a classifier to predict probabilities $p_i \in [0,1]$ but are given a dataset of observations $y_i \in \{0,1\}$. We propose to evaluate the arbitrariness of individual probability predictions through the lens of \emph{regret}. We introduce a measure of regret for probabilistic classification tasks, which measures how the predictions of a model could change as a result of different training labels. We present a general-purpose method to estimate the regret in a probabilistic classification task. We use our measure to show that regret is often higher for certain groups in the dataset and discuss potential applications of regret. We demonstrate how estimating regret can be used to promote safety in real-world applications by abstention and data collection.

Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) is widely used for decision-making under uncertainty, but its adversarial focus on worst-case loss can lead to overly conservative policies. To mitigate this, we study ex-ante Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization (DRRO) with Wasserstein ambiguity sets, designed to balance robustness with upside potential. We develop a theory of Wasserstein DRRO (WDRRO) paralleling Wasserstein DRO. Under smoothness and regularity, WDRRO selects among ERM optima by a first-order gradient-discrepancy rule. If the ERM optimizer is unique, first-order sensitivity vanishes and a second-order expansion governs deviations. For convex quadratics ERM and DRRO coincide for any radius. We then study regimes where these assumptions fail: nondifferentiable max-affine losses, discrete references, and larger radii, where WDRRO can differ from ERM and WDRO. We show that computing WDRRO regret is NP-hard even without bilinear terms. Nevertheless, we develop exact algorithms, a tractable convex relaxation with guarantees, and experiments showing tightness and loss-dependent behavior.

The $K$-Max combinatorial multi-armed bandit problem arises in applications such as recommendation and distributed decision making, where the reward is determined by the maximum outcome among $K$ selected arms. When outcomes are continuous and only the maximum value together with the winner's index is observed, this problem introduces unprecedented difficulties including discretization errors, non-deterministic tie-breaking, and severe estimation biases. To overcome these barriers, we introduce DCK-UCB, an efficient algorithm combining adaptive discretization with bias-corrected confidence bounds. We prove that DCK-UCB achieves a $\widetilde{O}(T^{3/4})$ regret bound, the first sublinear guarantee in this setting. Numerical experiments show strong performance over baseline methods. Furthermore, for the specific case of exponential distributions under full-bandit feedback, we propose the MLE-Exp algorithm that attains a near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound. This work establishes fundamental theoretical guarantees and provides a powerful algorithmic solution for continuous combinatorial bandits.

In the current practices of machine learning, the evaluation of forecasts has become a cornerstone of scientific progress. A multitude of evaluation metrics have been suggested and used to qualify "good" forecasts. What do those metrics share? How are they related? In this work, we use a protocol borrowed from game-theoretic probability to show that a large part of evaluation metrics can be viewed as averaged outcomes of fair gambles. Intuitively, a fair gambler is one which a forecaster would expect to fail. Hence, the gambler's ability to gain disproves the quality of the forecast. Standard evaluation metrics are then variants of choices of such fair gambles. In particular, this choice is structured along two dimensions, one of which separates calibration-type and regret-type metrics. In particular, this framework sheds light on the relationship of calibration and regret showing a theoretical equivalence in their ability to evaluate when being scaled appropriately, but the incomparability of obtained scores.

Thompson sampling (TS) is one of the most popular and earliest algorithms to solve stochastic multi-armed bandit problems. We consider a variant of TS, named $α$-TS, where we use a fractional or $α$-posterior ($α\in(0,1)$) instead of the standard posterior distribution. To compute an $α$-posterior, the likelihood in the definition of the standard posterior is tempered with a factor $α$. For $α$-TS we obtain both instance-dependent $\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{k \neq i^*} Δ_k\left(\frac{\log(T)}{C(α)Δ_k^2} + \frac{1}{2} \right)\right)$ and instance-independent $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{KT\log K})$ frequentist regret bounds under very mild conditions on the prior and reward distributions, where $Δ_k$ is the gap between the true mean rewards of the $k^{th}$ and the best arms, and $C(α)$ is a known constant. Both the sub-Gaussian and exponential family models satisfy our general conditions on the reward distribution. Our conditions on the prior distribution can be easily satisfied by a density that is positive, continuous, and bounded. We also establish another instance-dependent regret upper bound that matches (up to constants) to that of improved UCB [Auer and Ortner, 2010]. Our regret analysis carefully adapts and combines recent theoretical developments in the non-asymptotic concentration analysis and Bernstein-von Mises type results for the $α$-posterior distribution. Moreover, our analysis does not require additional structural properties such as closed-form posteriors or conjugate priors.

In this book, I introduce the concepts of online learning through a modern view based on convex optimization. Here, online learning refers to the framework of regret minimization under worst-case assumptions. I attempted to unify all the literature as instantiations of Online Mirror Descent and Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (and their variants). I paid particular attention to the issue of tuning the parameters of the algorithms, through adaptive and parameter-free online learning algorithms. The bandit setting is also briefly discussed, touching on the problem of adversarial and stochastic multi-armed bandits. Building on fundamental algorithms and concepts, I also cover advanced topics, including black-box reductions, saddle-point optimization, sequential investment, and non-stationary forms of regret analysis. Finally, I conclude with a selection of applications of online learning to domains far from it, such as generalization theory and concentration inequalities. I attempted to maintain an informal, yet mathematically rigorous, tone throughout the book. Moreover, all the included proofs have been carefully chosen to be as simple and as short as possible. This also means that sometimes I have added one or two additional assumptions, just to simplify the proofs.

Motivated by the concept of satisficing in decision-making, we consider the problem of satisficing regret minimization in bandit optimization. In this setting, the learner aims at selecting satisficing arms (arms with mean reward exceeding a certain threshold value) as frequently as possible. The performance is measured by satisficing regret, which is the cumulative deficit of the chosen arm's mean reward compared to the threshold. We propose SELECT, a general algorithmic template for Satisficing REgret Minimization via SampLing and LowEr Confidence bound Testing, that attains constant expected satisficing regret for a wide variety of bandit optimization problems in the realizable case (i.e., a satisficing arm exists). As a complement, SELECT also enjoys the same (standard) regret guarantee as the oracle in the non-realizable case. To further ensure stability of the algorithm, we introduce SELECT-LITE that achieves a light-tailed satisficing regret distribution plus a constant expected satisficing regret in the realizable case and a sub-linear expected (standard) regret in the non-realizable case. Notably, SELECT-LITE can operate on learning oracles with heavy-tailed (standard) regret distribution. More importantly, our results reveal the surprising compatibility between constant expected satisficing regret and light-tailed satisficing regret distribution, which is in sharp contrast to the case of (standard) regret. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to validate the performance of SELECT and SELECT-LITE on both synthetic datasets and a real-world dynamic pricing case study.